Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 國際企業學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/40908
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor李吉仁(Ji-Ren Lee)
dc.contributor.authorChia-Wen Hsuen
dc.contributor.author許嘉文zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-14T17:06:13Z-
dc.date.available2013-08-04
dc.date.copyright2008-08-04
dc.date.issued2008
dc.date.submitted2008-07-29
dc.identifier.citationREFERENCES
Amit, R., & Livnat, J. 1988. Diversification and the risk-return trade-off. Academy of Management Journal, 31: 154-166.
Araujo, L., Dubois, A., & Gadde, L-E. 2003. The multiple boundaries of the firm. Journal of Management Studies, 40(5): 1255-
Argyres, N. 1996. Evidence on the role of firm capabilities in vertical integration decisions. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 129-150.
Baird, I. S., & Thomas, H. 1990. What is risk anyway?: Using and measuring risk in strategic management. In R. A. Bettis and H. Thomas (eds), Risk Strategy, and Management, Vol. 5: 21-54. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Balakrishan, S., & Wernerfelt, B. 1986. Technical change, competition and vertical integration. Strategic Management Journal, 7: 347-359.
Baltagi, B. 1995. Econometric analysis of panel data. New York: Wiley.
Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99-120.
Barney, J. B. 1999. How a firm’s capabilities affect boundary decisions. Sloan Management Review, Spring: 137-145.
Barney, J. B., & Arikan, A. M. 2001. The resource-based view: origins and implications. In The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management, Hitt, M. A., Freeman, R. E., & Harrison, J. S. (eds). Blackwell: Oxford, U.K.:124-188.
Bartlett, C., & Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing Across Borders: The Transactional Solution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. 1995. Transnational Management: text, cases, and readings in cross-border management. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: Irwin.
Beaver, G. 2002. Contemporary research on business growth. Strategic Change, 11(2): 55-58.
Bercovitz, J., & Mitchell, W. 2007. When is more better? The impact of business scale and scope on long-term business survival, while controlling for profitability. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 61-79.
Bettis, R. A. 1981. Performance differences in related and unrelated diversified firms. Strategic Management Journal, 2(9): 379-383.
Bettis, R. A. 1982. Risk considerations in modeling corporate strategy. Academy of Management proceedings: 22-25.
Bettis, R. A. 1983. Modern financial theory, corporate strategy and public policy: Three conundrums. Academy of Management Review, 8: 406-415.
Bettis, R., & Hall, W. K., 1982. Diversification strategy accounting determined risk and accounting determined return. Academy of Management Journal, 25: 254-264.
Bettis, R. A., & Mahajan, V. 1985. Risk/Return performance of diversified firms. Management Science, 31(7): 785-799.
Bettis, R. A., Bradley, S. P., & Hamel, G., 1992. Outsourcing and industrial decline. Academy of Management Executive, 6(1): 7-22.
Bowman, E. H. 1980. A risk/return paradox for strategic management. Sloan Management Review, 21(3):17-31.
Bowman, E. H. 1982. Risk seeking by troubled firms. Sloan Management Review, 23(4):33-42.
Bromiley, P. 1990. On the use of finance theory in strategic management. In P. Shrivastava and R. Lamb (eds). Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 6: 71-98. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Bromiley, P., Miller, K. D., & Rau, D. 2001. Risk in strategic management research. In M. A. Hitt, R. E. Freeman, & J. S. Harrison (eds), The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management. Blackwell Publishing.
Brouthers, K. D., & Brouthers, L. E. 2003. Why service and manufacturing entry mode choices differ: The influence of transaction cost factors, risk and trust. Journal of Management Studies, 40: 1179-1204.
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 1998. Competing on the edge, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Brush, T. H. 1996. Predicted change in operational synergy and post-acquisition performance of acquired businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 17(1):1-24.
Celly, K. S., Spekman, R. E., & Kamauff, J. W. 1999. Technology uncertainty, buyer preferences and supplier assurances: An examination of Pacific Rim purchasing arrangements. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(2): 297-316.
Chandler, A. 1962. Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
Chatterjee, S. 1991. Gains in vertical acquisitions and market power: Theory and evidence. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 718-733.
Chatterjee, S., & Wernerfelt, B. 1991. The link between resources and type of diversification: Theory and evidence. Strategic Management Journal, 12:33-48.
Christensen, C. M. 1997. The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Christensen, C. M. & Bower, J. L. 1996. Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 197-218.
Christensen, J. F., & Foss, N. J. 1997. Dynamic corporate coherence and competence-based competition: theoretical foundations and strategic implications. In A. Heene, & R. Sanchez (Eds.), Competence-based Strategic Management. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Coase, R. H. 1937. The nature of the firm. Econometrica, 4: 386-405.
Combs, J. G., & Ketchen, JR. 1999. Explaining interfirm cooperation and performance: Toward a reconciliation of predictions from the resource-based view and organizational economics. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 867-888.
Conner, K. R. 1991. A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: Do we have a new theory of the firm? Journal of Management, 17: 121-154.
Conner, K., & Prahalad, C. K. 1996. A resource-based theory of the firm : Knowledge versus opportunism. Organization Science, 5: 477-501.
Cool, k., & Henderson, J. 1998. Power and firm profitability in supply chains: France manufacturing industry in 1993. Strategic Management Journal, 19:909-926.
Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. 1999. An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24: 522-537.
Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Danneels, E. 2002. The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12):1095-1121.
Danneels, E. 2007. The process of technological competence leveraging. Strategic Management Journal, 28:511-533.
Datta, D. K., Rajagopalan, N., & Rasheed, M. A. 1991. Diversification and performance: Critical review and future directions. Journal of Management Studies, 28: 529-548.
David, R. J., & Han, S-K. 2004. A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 39-58.
Deephouse, D. L., & Wiseman, R. M. 2000. Comparing alternative explanations for accounting risk-return relations. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 42: 463-482.
Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. 1999. Geographic scope, product diversification, and the corporate performance of Japanese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 20(8): 711-727.
Derick, J. & Kraemer, K. L. 1998. Asia’s computer challenge: Threat of opportunity for the United States and the world? New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. 1989. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12): 1504-1513.
Diez-Vial, I. 2007. Explaining vertical integration strategies: Market power, transactional attributes and capabilities. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6): 1017-1040.
Dushnitsky, K. M., & Lenox, M. 2003. Investing in new ventures as a strategy to generate innovations. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Conference of Strategic Management Society, Baltimore, MD.
Dyer, J. H. 1997. Effective interfirm collaboration: How firms minimize transaction costs and maximize transaction value. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 535-556.
Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. 1998. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of inter-organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4): 660-679.
Eisenhardt, K. M. & Martin, J. A. 2000. Dynamic capabilities: What are they?. Strategic Management Journal, 21:1105-1121.
Fichman, M. & Levinthal, D. A. 1991. Honeymoons and the liability of adolescence: A new perspective on duration dependence in social and organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 16(2):442-468.
Fiegenbaum, A. , & Thomas, H. 1988. Attitudes toward risk and the risk-return paradox: Prospect theory explanations. Academy of Management Journal, 31: 85-106.
Foss, N. J. 1993. The theory of the firm: Contractual and competence perspectives. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 3: 127-144.
Foss, N. J. 1996. Introduction: The emerging competence perspective. In Foss, N. J., & Kundsen, C. (Eds), Towards a Competence Theory of The Firm, 1-12, London, UK: Routledge.
Georski, P. A. 2005. Understanding the implications of empirical work on corporate growth rates. Managerial and Decision Economics, 26: 129-138.
Geringer, J. M. & Beamish, P. W., deCosta, R. C. 1989. Diversification strategy and internationalization: implications for MNE performance. Strategic Management Journal, 10:109-119.
Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict, E. M., & Kumar, N. 2006. Make, buy, or ally: A transaction cost theory meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3): 519-543.
Ghoshal, S., & Moran, P. 1996. Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21: 13-47.
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. 2004. The antecedents consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2): 209-226.
Goerzen, A., & Beamish, P. 2005. The effect of alliance network diversity on multinational enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 333-354.
Grant, R. M. 1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue, 17: 109-122.
Greene, W. H. 2003. Econometric Analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Gulati, R., Khanna, T., & Nohria, N. 1994. Unilateral commitments and the importance of process in alliances. Sloan Management Review, Spring:61-69.
Hamel, G. 1991. Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 83-103.
Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. 1993. Strategy as stretch and leverage. Harvard Business Review, 71(2): 75-84.
He, Z-L., & Wong, P-K. 2004. Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypotheses. Organization Science, 15(4): 481-494.
Helfat, C. E. 1997. Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: The case of R&D. Strategic Management Journal, 18(5): 339-360.
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. 2003. The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10): 997-1010.
Helfat, C. E. 2007. Dynamic capabilities: foundations. In C. E. Helfat, S. Finkelstein, W. Mitchell, M. A. Peteraf, H. Singh, D. J. Teece, and S. G. Winter (eds), Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations, Blackwell Publishing.
Henderson, R., & Cockburn, I. 1994. Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal, Winter special Issue 15: 63-84.
Hisey, K. B., & Caves, R. E. 1985. Diversification strategy and choice of country: diversifying acquisitions abroad by U.S. multinationals,1978-1980. Journal of International Business Studies. 16: 51-64.
Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E. & Ireland, R. D. 1994. A mid-range theory of the interactive effects of international and product diversification on innovation and performance. Journal of Management, 20:297-326.
Hitt, M.A., Hoskisson, R.E., & Kim, H. 1997. International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 767-798.
Hitt, M. A., Keats, B. W., & DeMarie, S. M. 1999. Navigating in the new competitive landscape: Building strategic flexibility and competitive advantages in 21st century. Academy of Management Executive, 12(4): 22-42.
Hoetker, G. 2005. How much you know versus how well I know you: Selecting a supplier for a technically innovative component. Strategic Management Journal, 26(1): 75-96.
Hoopes, D. G., Madsen, T. L., & Walker, G. 2003. Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue: Why is there a resource-based view? Toward a theory of competitive heterogeneity. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 889-902.
Hsiao, C. 1986. Analysis of Panel Data. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K.
Jacobides, M. G. 2005. Industry change through vertical dis-integration: How and why markets emerge. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3): 465-490.
Jacobides, M. G. & Hitt, L. M. 2005. Losing sight of the forest for the trees? productive capabilities and gains from trade as derivers of vertical scope. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 1209-1227.
Jacobides, M. G. & Winter, S. G. 2005. The co-evolution of capabilities and transaction costs: explaining the institutional structure of production. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 395-413.
Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. The Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305-360.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, D. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47: 262-291.
Karim, S. Z., & Mitchell, W. 2000. Path-dependent and path-breaking change: Reconfiguring business resources following acquisitions in the U.S. medical sector, 1978-1995. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11): 1061-1081.
Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. 1997. Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 75(4): 41-51.
Kim, W. C., P. Hwang & Burgers, W. P. 1993. Multinationals’ Diversification and the risk-return trade-off. Strategic Management Journal, 14:275-286.
Kmenta, J. 1986. Elements of econometric., New York: MacMillan.
Knudsen, C. 1996. The competence perspective: A historical view, In Foss, N. J. and Knudsen, C. (Eds), Towards a Competence Theory of the Firm, 13-37, New York, NY: Routledge.
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology, Organization Science, 3: 383-397.
Kor, Y. Y., & Mahoney, J. T. 2005. How dynamics, management, and governance of resource deployments influence firm-level performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 489-496.
Kraemer, K. L., & Dedrick, J. 1998. Globalization and increasing returns: Implications for the U.S. computer industry. Information Systems Research, 9(4): 303-322.
Langlois, R. 1992. Transaction cost economics in real time. Industrial and Corporate Change, 1: 99-127.
Langlois, R. & Robertson, P. 1995. Firm, Markets and Economic Change: A Dynamic Theory of Business Institutions. New York: Routledge.
Lant, T. K. 1992. aspiration level adaptation: An empirical exploration. Management Science, 38: 623-644.
Leiblein, M. J. & Miller, D. J. 2003. An empirical examination of transaction and firm-level influences on the vertical boundaries of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 839-859.
Leiblein, M. J., Reuer, J. J., & Dalsace, F. 2002. Do make or buy decisions matter? The influence of organizational governance on technological performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 817-833.
Lemelin, A. 1982. relatedness in the patterns of inter-industry diversification. Review of Economics and Statistics. November: 27-36.
Leonard-Barton, D. 1992. Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, Summer special issue, 13: 111-126.
Levinthal, D. A. & Fichman, M. 1988. Dynamics of interorganizational attachments: Auditor-client relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33:345-369.
Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. 1993. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 95-112.
Levitt, B., & March, J. G. 1988. Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14: 319-340.
Li, S. X., & Greenwood, R. 2004. The effect of within-industry diversification on firm performance: Synergy creation, multi-market contact and market structuration. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 1131-1153.
Lintner, J. 1965. The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investment in stock portfolios and capital budgets. Review and Economics and statistics, 47: 13-37.
Lockett, A. 2005. Edith Penrose’s legacy to the resource-based view. Managerial and Decision Economics, 26: 83-98.
Luo, Y. 2002. Capability exploitation and building in a foreign market: Implications for multinational enterprises. Organization Science, 13(1): 48-63.
Madhok, A. 1996. The organization of economic activity: Transaction costs, firm capabilities and the nature of governance. Organization Science, 7: 577-590.
Madhok, A. 2000. Inter-firm collaboration: Contractual and capabilities-based
perspectives. In Foss Nicolai and Mahnke Volker (eds) Competenc, Governance and Entrepreneurship-Advances in Economic Strategy Research. London, UK: Oxford University Press.
Madhok, A. 2002. Reassessing the fundamentals and beyond: Ronald Coase, the transaction cost and resource-based theories of the firm and the institutional structure of production. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 535-550.
Madhok, A., & Tallman, S. B. 1998. Resources, transactions and rents: Managing value through interfirm collaborative relationships. Organization Science, 9: 326-339.
Mahoney, J. T. 1992. The choice of organizational form: Vertical financial ownership versus other modes of vertical integration. Strategic Management Journal, 13(8): 559-584.
Mahoney, J. T., & Pandian, J. R. 1992. The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 13(5): 363-380.
Macher, J. T., & Boerner, C. S. 2006. Experience and scale and scope economies: Trade-offs and performance in development. Strategic Management Journal, 27: 845-865.
March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1): 71-78.
March, J. G., & Shapira, Z. 1987. Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Science, 33: 1404-1418.
Markides, C. C., & Williamson, P. J. 1996. Corporate diversification and organizational structure: a resource-based view. Academy of Management journal, 39(2):340-367.
Miller, K. D., & Chen, W-R. 2003. Risk and firm’s costs. Strategic Organization, 1(4): 355-382.
Miller, K. D., & Reuer, J. J. 1996. Measuring organizational downside risk. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 671-691.
Milliken, F. J. 1987. Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State, effect, and response uncertainty. Academy of Management Review, 12: 133-143.
Montgomery, C. A., & Hariharan, S. 1991. Diversified entry by established firms. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 15: 71-89.
Mundlak, Y. 1978. On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econometrica, 46(1): 69-85.
Nelson, R., & Winter, S. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic exchange. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nevens, T. M., Summe, G. L., & Uttal, B. 1990. Commercializing technology: What the best companies do. Harvard Business Review, 68(3): 154-163.
Newbert, S. L. 2007. Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: An assessment and suggestions for future research. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 121-146.
Nickel, M. N., & Rodriguez, M. C. 2002. A review of research on the negative accounting relationship between risk and return: Bowman’s paradox. Omega, 30: 1-18.
Panzar, J. C., & Willig, R. D. 1981. Economies of scope. American Economic Review, 71(2): 268-272.
Penrose, E.T. 1959/1995. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (3rd edn). Oxford University Press: Oxford
Peteraf, M. A. 1993. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view, Strategic Management Journal, 14(3): 179-191.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. 1978. The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. New York:Harper & Row, Publishers.
Pitelis, C. 2005. Edith Penrose, organizational economics and business strategy: An assessment and extension. Managerial and Decision Economics, 26: 67-82.
Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. 1990. The Core Competence of the Corporation, Harvard Business Review, 68(3): 79-91.
Poppo, L. & Zenger, T. 1998. Testing alternative theories of the firm: transaction cost, knowledge-based and measurement explanations for mark-or-buy decisions in information services. Strategic Management Journal, 19(9): 853-878.
Porter, M. E. 1980. Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.
Porter, M. 1985. Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press: New York.
Porter, M. 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Free Press: New York.
Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. 2001. Is resource-based ‘view’a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review, 26(1): 22-40.
Qian, G. 2002. Multinationality, product diversification, and profitability of emerging U.S. small-and medium-sized enterprises, Journal of Business Venturing, 17: 611-633.
Quinn, J. B., & Hilmer, F. G. 1994. Strategic outsourcing. Sloan Management Review, 35:43-55.
Reuer, J. J., & Leiblein, M. J. 2000. Downside risk implications of multinationality and international joint ventures, Academy of Management Journal, 43(2): 203-214.
Richardson, G. B. 1972. The organization of industry. Economic Journal, 82: 883-896.
Rindfleisch, A., & heide, J. B. 1997. Transaction cost analysis: Past, present, and future applications. Journal of Marketing, 61(4): 30-54.
Rugman, A. M. 1979. International Diversification and the Multinational Enterprise. Lexington, MA: Heath.
Rumelt, R. P. 1974. Strategy, structure, and economic performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rumelt, R. P. 1984. Toward a strategic theory of the firm, in R. B. Lamb (Eds), Competitive strategic management, New Jersey, NJ: Upper Saddle River.
Russo, M.V., & Fouts, P. A. 1997. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3): 534-559.
Sanchez, R. 2003. Integrating transaction costs theory and real options theory. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24: 267-282.
Sanchez, R., & Heene, A. 1997. Strategic learning and knowledge management. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Sanchez, R., Heene, A., & Thomas, H. 1996. Introduction: Towards the theory and practice of competence-based competition. In R. Sanchez, A. Heene, & T. H. (Eds.), Dynamics of competence-based competition: Theory and practice in the new strategic management: 1-35. Oxford, UK: Elservier Science Ltd.
Santos, F. M. 2003. Constructing niches and shaping boundaries: Entrepreneurial action in nascent fields. Unpublished dissertation, Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Santos, F. M. & Eisenhardt, K. M. 2005. Organizational boundaries and theory of organization. Orgaization Science, 16(5): 491-508.
Schilling, M. A., & Steensma, H. K. 2002. Disentangling the theories of firm boundaries: A path model and empirical test. Organization Science, 13(4): 387-401.
Schmalensee, R. 1985. Do markets differ much? American Economic Review, 75: 341-351.
Sharpe, W. F. 1964. Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. Journal of Finance, 19: 425-442.
Siddharthan, N., & Lall, S. 1982. Recent growth of largest U. S. multinationals. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 44: 1-13.
Stern, I., & Henderson, A. D. 2004. Within-business diversification in technology-intensive industries. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 487-505.
Stewart, J. F., R. F. Harris, & Carleton, W. T. 1984. The role of market structure in merger behavior. Journal of Industrial Economics. 32: 293-312.
Sturgeon, T., & Lee, J-R. 2005. Industry co-evolution: A comparison of Taiwan and North America’s electronics contract manufacturing in Norht America and Taiwan. In S. Berger and R. K. Lester (eds), Global Taiwan: Building Competitive Strengths in a New International Economy, New York, NY: M.E., Sharpe, Inc.
Tallman, S., & Li, J. 1996. Effects of international diversity and product diversity on performance of multinational firms. Academy of Management journal, 39(1):179-196.
Tanriverdi, H., & Lee, C-H. 2008. Within-industry diversification and firm performance in the presence of network externalities: Evidence from the software industry. Academy of Management journal, 51(2):381-397.
Teece, D. J. 1982. Towards an economic theory of the multi-product firm. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, 39-63.
Teece, D. J. 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: Implication for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15: 285-305.
Teece, D. J. 1988. Capturing value from technological innovation: Integration, strategic partnering, and licensing decisions, Interfaces, 18(3): 46-61.
Teece, D. J. 1992. Competition, cooperation, and innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 18: 1-25.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7): 509-533.
Teece, D. J., Rumelt, R., Dosi, G. Winter, S. 1994. Understanding corporate coherence: theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 23: 1-30.
Tripsas, M. 1997. Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue 18: 119-142.
Veliyath, R., & Ferris, S. P. 1997. Agency influences on risk reduction and operating performance: An empirical investigation among strategic groups. Journal of Business Research, 39: 219-230.
Walker, G., & Weber, D. 1984. A transaction cost approach to make or buy decisions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 373-391.
Wang, H. C., & Barney, J. B. 2006. Employee incentives to make firm-specific investments: Implications for resource-based theories of corporate diversification. Academy of Management Review, 31(2): 466-476.
Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2): 171-180.
Wernerfelt, B. 1984. 1997. On the nature and scope of the firm: An adjustment-cost theory. Journal of Business, 70(4): 509-533.
Williamson, OE. 1975. Market and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications. Free Press: New York.
Williamson, OE. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Free Press: New York.
Williamson, OE. 1991. Strategizing, economizing, and economic organization. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue, 12: 75-94.
Williamson, OE. 1999. Strategy research: governance and competence perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 20(12): 1087-1108.
Xavier, S. 2005. Are you at the top of your game? Checklist for effective leaders. Journal of Business Strategy, 26(3): 35-42.
Yoffie, D. 1997. Competing in the age of digital convergence. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Zaheer, S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness, Academy of Management Journal, 38(2): 341-363.
Zaheer, S., & Mosakowski, E. 1997. The dynamics of the liability of foreignness: A global study of survival in financial services. Strategic Management Journal, 18(6): 439-465.
Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. 2002. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3): 339-351.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/40908-
dc.description.abstract本論文主要是以能耐基礎理論的觀點,探討廠商投入資源在能耐提昇與事業佈局活動的不同作法,對於企業成長的影響,並檢驗能耐提昇與事業佈局對於事業經營風險與績效的影響,從而建立以能耐為基礎的企業成長策略。研究架構上,本研究以產品能耐發展做為能耐提昇之主要衡量基礎,事業佈局則區分為垂直範疇延伸、與水平範疇延伸兩個方向,並以企業之投入資本報酬率、及其低於產業平均報酬水準之程度作為績效與風險的衡量指標,實證樣本則是以國內上市上櫃的312家電子資訊硬體製造廠商為範疇,收集其於1998-2006年間的營運資料以進行實證分析。
研究結果顯示,在能耐提昇方面,廠商投入資源在產品能耐提昇上,對企業的經營績效有負向的影響,但卻呈現邊際遞增之非線性關係,但產品能耐提昇對於企業的經營風險有正向的影響,但卻呈現邊際遞減之非線性關係;在事業佈局的構念上,廠商的垂直範疇延伸及水平範疇延伸增加,對經營績效會產生正向且邊際遞減的影響,對經營風險則會產生負向且邊際遞增的影響。本研究也發現,廠商的營運策略同時涉入產品能耐提昇與垂直範疇延伸上,能顯著的降低事業風險之外,同時能提昇廠商的營運績效。
至於事業佈局對於能耐提昇與經營績效與事業風險之干擾關係,結果顯示,廠商的營運策略以高度產品能耐提昇、高度垂直範疇延伸會產生高營運績效、低事業風險的關係。此結果顯示,廠商投入資源於能耐提昇時,應同時將能耐延伸與垂直與水平事業範疇,才能提高廠商營運績效,亦同時降低事業風險。
根據本研究結果,我們建議廠商在規劃成長策略時,應以能耐為規劃中心,配合外部機會的分析,思考如何透過策略性能耐提昇、以及能耐延伸,建構具有較佳獲利、同時較低風險的成長路徑,以確保企業的永續經營與競爭力。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractBased on the competence-based view, the present thesis postulates that a firm’s activities that are dedicated to either upgrading or leveraging strategic competence will exert differential impacts on the firm’s risk level and economic return. Such an inquiry would lead us to establish a competence-based growth theory of the firm. To empirically implement this research inquiry, we identify two types of competence-based activities: competence upgrading and business configuration. In addition, we define two directions in which these competencies could be leveraged; they are vertical and horizontal scopes of business activities. We took a firm’s returns on invested capital as its economic profit measure, and the downside risk measure as its business risk measure. Our empirical investigation is based on the operating and financial data of 312 listed electronics and computer companies across 1998-2006.
Overall speaking, our results show a high degree of consistency between theoretical predictions and empirical evidence. Product competence upgrading maintains a U-shaped relationship with firm’s economic return, while it has an inverted U-shaped relationship with the level of business risk. As far as business configuration is concerned, we found that both vertical scope expansion and horizontal scope expansion will have an inverted U-shaped relationship with firm’s economic return and U-shaped relationship with business risk. Taking both competence upgrading and business configuration into consideration, our empirical results show that upgrading product competence while leveraging those competence across a wider scope of value chain, a firm’s business risk will be substantially reduced while enhance an insignificant portion of economic return.
To further examine the moderating effects of business configuration on the relationship between competence upgrading and firm performance, we conduct further comparative analyses. We found that high competence upgrading combined with high leveraging in vertical scope will reveal a high-return-low-risk outcome. The combination of competence upgrading and competence leveraging therefore could facilitate a firm’s achievement of low risk with high economic return.
According to research findings, we suggest that firms should manage competence activities with external opportunities to constitute corporate growth strategies. Our results shall motivate a firm to construct a growth path based on competence upgrading and leveraging for higher return and lower risk to sustain competitive advantages.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-14T17:06:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-97-D92724010-1.pdf: 546740 bytes, checksum: ea825e890c4765429093a391b72c6a21 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2008
en
dc.description.tableofcontentsTABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION..............................................1
1.1 Research Motivation...................................1
1.2 Research Question.....................................8
1.3 Research Approach....................................11
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW........................................14
2.1 Existing Theory on Firm Boundaries...................14
2.2 Resource-Based View and Boundary Decision............17
2.3 Competence-Based View and Boundary Decision..........23
2.4 Risk in Strategic Management.........................25
2.5 Business Configuration and Risk-Return Relationship..31
CHAPTER 3
THEORETICAL DEVELOPMENT AND HYPOTHESES...................40
3.1 Competence Upgrading and Firm Performance............41
3.2 Business Configuration and Firm Performance..........44
3.3 Moderating Effects of Business Configuration.........49
CHAPTER 4
METHODS..................................................54
4.1 Empirical Context....................................54
4.2 Sample and Data Sources..............................55
4.3 Variables and Measurements...........................56
4.4 Model Specification..................................61
CHAPTER 5
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION...................................64
5.1 Regression Results...................................64
5.2 Discussion...........................................78
5.3 Limitations..........................................81
CHAPTER 6
CONCLUSIONS..............................................83
6.1 Contribution.........................................84
6.2 Future Research......................................88
REFERENCES...............................................91
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject事業佈局zh_TW
dc.subject能耐提昇zh_TW
dc.subject經營風險zh_TW
dc.subject經營績效zh_TW
dc.subjectBusiness Configurationen
dc.subjectEconomic Returnen
dc.subjectDownside Risken
dc.subjectCompetence Upgradingen
dc.title能耐提昇、事業佈局與風險及報酬之關係zh_TW
dc.titleCompetence Upgrading, Business Configuration, and Risk-Return Relationshipen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear96-2
dc.description.degree博士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee邱奕嘉(Yi-Chia Chiu),陳振祥(Jen-Shyang Chen),陳俊忠(Chun-Chung Chen),劉恆逸(Heng-Yih Liu)
dc.subject.keyword能耐提昇,事業佈局,經營風險,經營績效,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordCompetence Upgrading,Business Configuration,Downside Risk,Economic Return,en
dc.relation.page107
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2008-07-29
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept國際企業學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:國際企業學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-97-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
533.93 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved