請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/40796完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 湯明哲 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chin-Jung Luan | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 欒錦榮 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-14T17:00:41Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2010-08-04 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2008-08-04 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2008-07-30 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. Amit, R. and Schoemaker, P. J. (1993), “Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent”, Strategic Management Journal, 14: 33-46.
2. Bain, J. S. (1956), Barriers to New Competition, Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA. 3. Bain, J. S. (1959), Industrial Organization, Wiley: New York. 4. Barney, J. B. (1986), “Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy”, Management Science, 32: 1231-1241. 5. Barney, J. B. (1991), “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management, 17: 99-120. 6. Barney, J. B. and Zajac, E. (1994), “Competitive Organizational Behavior: toward An Organizationally-based Theory of Competitive Advantage”, Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 15: 5-9. 7. Block, Z. and MacMillan, I. C. (1993), Corporate Venturing: Creating New Business within the Firm. Harvard Business School Press: Cambridge, MA. 8. Bowman, E. H. (1982), “Risk Seeking by Troubled Firms”, Sloan Management Review, 23 (4): 33-42. 9. Busija, E. C., O’Neill, H. M. and Zeithaml, C. P. (1997), “Diversification Strategy, Entry Mode, and Performance: Evidence of Choice and Constraints”, Strategic Management Journal, 18 (4): 321-327. 10. Campa, J. M. (1993), “Entry by Foreign Firms in the United States under Exchange-rate Uncertainty”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 75 (4): 614-622. 11. Cantwell, J. (1991), “A Survey of Theories of International Production”, in N. Petelis and R. Sugden (ed.), The Nature of the Transnational Firm: 16-63. 12. Chang, C. J., Yen, S-H. and Duh, R-R. (2002), “An Empirical Examination of Competing Theories to Explain the Framing Effect in Accounting-related Decisions”, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 14: 35-64. 13. Chang, S. J. and Rosenweig, P. M. (2001), “The Choice of Entry Mode in Sequential Foreign Direct Investment”, Strategic Management Journal, 22: 747-776. 14. Christensen, C. M. (1997), The Innovator’s Dilemma. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA. 15. Christensen, J. F. and Foss, J. J. (1997), “Dynamic Corporate Coherence and Competence-based Competition: Theoretical Foundations and Strategic Implications”, in A. Heene and R. Sanchez, (eds.), Competence-based Strategic Management, pp. 287-312, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 16. Debruyne, M. and Reibstein, D. J. (2005), “Competitor See, Competitor Do: Incumbent Entry in New Market Niches”, Marketing Science, 24 (1): 55-66. 17. Dierickx, I. and Cool, K. (1989), “Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage”, Management Science, 35: 1504-1514. 18. Douglas, T. J. and Ryman, J. A. (2003), “Understanding Competitive Advantage in the General Hospital Industry: Evaluating Strategic Competencies”, Strategic Management Journal, 24: 333-347. 19. Dowell, G. and Swaminathan, A. (2006), “Entry Timing, Exploration, and Firm Survival in the Early U. S. Bicycle Industry”, Strategic Management Journal, 27 (12): 1159-1182. 20. Dunne, T., Roberts, M. J. and Samuelson, L., (1988), “Patters of Firm Entry and Exit in U.S. Manufacturing Industries”, The Rand Journal of Economics, 14: 495-515. 21. Dunning, J. (2001), “The Eclectic (OLI) Paradigm of International Production: Past, Present and Future”, International Journal of the Economics of Business, 8 (2): 173-190. 22. Dyer, J. H. and Singh, H. (1998), “The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage”, Academy of Management Review, 23: 660-679. 23. Eisenhardt, K. and Martin, J. (2000), “Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They”, Strategic Management Journal, 21 (special issue): 1105-1121. 24. Eisenmann, T. R. (2006), “Internet Companies’ Growth Strategies: Determinants of Investment Intensity and Long-term Performance”, Strategic Management Journal, 27: 1183-1204. 25. Folta, T. B. and O’Brien, J. P. (2004), “Entry in the Presence of Dueling Options”, Strategic Management Journal, 25: 121-138. 26. Foss, J. J. and Christensen, J. F. (2001), “A Market-Process Approach to Corporate Coherence”, Managerial and Decision Economics, 22: 213-226. 27. Fuentelsaz, L. , Gomez, J. and Polo. Y. (2002), “Followers’ Entry Timing: Evidence from The Spanish Banking Sector after Deregulation”, Strategic Management Journal, 23: 245-264. 28. Gimeno, J. (1999), “Reciprocal Threats in Multimarket Rivalry: Staking out ‘Spheres of Influence’ in the U.S. Airline Industry”, Strategic Management Journal, 20: 101-128. 29. Greve, H. R. (1996), “Patterns of Competitions: The Diffusion of a Market position in Radio Broadcasting”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (1): 29-61. 30. Gulati, R. (1999), “Network Location and Learning: The Influence of Network Resources and Firm Capabilities on Alliance Formation”, Strategic Management Journal, 20: 397-420. 31. Hambrick, D. D., Geletkanycz, M. A. and Fredrickson, J. W. (1993), “Top Executive Commitment to the status quo: Some Tests of Its Determinants”, Strategic Management Journal, 14: 401-418. 32. Harrison, J .S., Hitt, M. A.., and Ireland, R. D. (1991), “Synergies and Post-acquisition Performance Difference versus Similarities in Resource Allocations”, Journal of Management, 17: 173-192. 33. Henderson, R. and Cockburn, I. (1994), “Measuring Competence? Exploring firms effects in Pharmaceutical Research”, Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 15: 63-84. 34. Hitt, M. A., Tihanyi, L., Miller, T., and Connelly, B. (2006), “International Diversification: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators”, Journal of Management, 32 (6): 831-867. 35. Hymer, S. (1976), The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 36. Jemison, D. B. and Sitkin, S. B. (1986), “Corporate Acquisitions: A Process Perspective”, Academy of Management Review, 11: 145-164. 37. Jensen, M. C. and Murphy, K. J. (1990), “Performance Pay and Top Management Incentives”, Journal of Political Economy, 98: 225-264. 38. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979), “Prospect Theory of Decisions under Risk”, Econometrica, 47 (2): 263-291. 39. Karakaya, F. (2002), “Barriers to Entry in Industrial Markets”, The Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 17 (5): 379-388. 40. King, A. A. and Tucci, C. L. (2002), “Incumbent Entry into New Market Niches: The Role of Experience and Managerial Choice in the Creation of Dynamic Capabilities”, Management Science, 48 (2): 171-186. 41. Klepper, S. and Simons, K. L. (2000), “Dominance by Birthright: Entry of Prior Radio Producers and Competitive Ramifications in the US Television Receiver Industry”, Strategic Management Journal, 21: 997-1016. 42. Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1992), “Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology”, Organization Science, 7: 502-528. 43. Lambkin, M. (1988), “Order of Entry and Performance in New Markets”, Strategic Management Journal, 9: 127-140. 44. Lee, C-W., Lee, K-M. and Pennings, J. M. (2001), “Internal Capabilities, External Networks, and Performance: A Study on Technology-based Ventures”, Strategic Management Journal, 22: 615-640. 45. Lieberman, M. B. and Montgomery, D. B. (1988), “First-mover Advantages”, Strategic Management Journal, 9: 41-58. 46. March, J. G. and Sharpira, Z. (1987), “Managerial Perspectives on Risk and Risk Taking”, Management Science, 33: 1404-1418. 47. Miller, D. (2004), “Firms’ Technological Resources and the Performance Effects of Diversification: A Longitudinal Study”, Strategic Management Journal, 25: 1097-1109. 48. Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. The Belknap Press: Cambridge, MA. 49. Peng, M. W. (2006), Global Strategy. Cincinnati: Thomson South-Western. 50. Penrose, E. T. (1959), The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Wiley & Sons, New York. 51. Peteraf, M. A. (1993), “The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-based View”, Strategic Management Journal, 14: 179-191. 52. Pierce, W. D., Cameron, J., Banko, K. M. and So, S. (2003), “Positive Effects of Rewards and Performance Standards on Intrinsic Motivation”, The Psychological Record, 53 (4): 561-578. 53. Porter, M. E. (1980), Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. Free Press: New York. 54. Powell, T. C. (1996), “How Much Does Industry Matter? An Alternative Empirical Test”, Strategic Management Journal, 17: 323-334. 55. Prahalad, C. and Hamel, G. (1990), “The Core Competence of the Corporation”, Harvard Business Review, 68: 79-91. 56. Puranam, P. (2000), “Grafting Innovation through Acquisition”, mimeo, University of Pennsylvania. 57. Robinson, K. C. and McDougall, P. P. (2001), “Entry Barriers and New Venture Performance: A Comparison of Universal and Contingent Approaches”, Strategic Management Journal, 22: 659-685. 58. Rumelt, R. P. (1974), Strategy, Structure, and Economic Performance. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA. 59. Rumelt, R. P. (1991), “How Much Does Industry Matter?”, Strategic Management Journal, 12: 167-185. 60. Schmalensee, R. (1985), “Do Markets Differ Much?”, American Economic Review, 75: 342-351. 61. Schoenecker, T. S. and Cooper, A. C. (1998), “The Role of Firm Resources and Organizational Attributes in Determining Entry Timing: A Cross-Industry Study”, Strategic Management Journal, 19 (12): 1127-1143. 62. Sharma, A. and Kesner, I. F. (1996), “Diversifying Entry: Some ex ante Explanations for Postentry Survival and Growth”, Academy of Management Journal, 39 (3): 635-677. 63. Shaver, J. M. (1999), “Accounting for Endogeneity when Assessing Strategy Performance: Does Entry Mode Choice Affect FDI Survival?”, Management Science, 44: 571-585. 64. Silverman, B. S. (1999), “Technological Resources and the Direction of Corporate Diversification: Toward an Integration of the Resource-based View and Transaction Cost Economics”, Management Science, 45: 1109-1124. 65. Singh, J. V., (1986), “Performnace, Slack, and Risk Taking in Organizational Decision Making”, Academy of Management Journal, 29: 562-585. 66. Smith, C. G. and Cooper, A. A. (1988), “Established Companies Diversifying into Young Industries: A Comparison of Firms with Different Levels of Performance”, Strategic Management Journal, 9 (2): 111-121. 67. Tang, M-J. and Yu, C-M. J. (1990), “Foreign Market Entry: Production-related Strategies”, Management Science, 36: 476-489. 68. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997), “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management”, Strategic Management Journal, 18: 509-533. 69. Thornhill, S. and Amit, R. (1999), “A Dynamic Perspective of Internal Fit in Corporate Venturing”, Academy of Management Proceedings, ENT: A1-A6. 70. Wally, S. and Fong, C-M. (2000), “Effects of Firm Performance, Organizational Slack, and Debt on Entry Timing: A Study of Ten Emerging Product Markets in USA”, Industry and Innovation, 7 (2): 169-183. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/40796 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 多角化進入新事業在策略管理領域已成為極高研究注意的主題, 但相對而言, 大多數的多角化進入策略研究均未針對新興產業的潛在廠商進入行為加以著墨。新興產業具有高度成長潛力的特性, 同時也伴隨著高度市場及技術的不確定性。尤其在過去廿至卅年, 數位化革命已成為科技產業的重要議題, 包括個人電腦及手持式電子設備的發展。而這迅速的科技發展更轉換了許多商業模式, 以及形成許多新的產業。廠商在面對新興產業時, 便面臨了是否進入與何時進入的重大決策, 而潛在進入者除了考慮廠商本身的條件之外, 也同時會面臨進入新興市場是否能快速地延伸或發展新市場必要的能耐的挑戰。
本研究即旨在解釋廠商面臨新興產業時進入行為之差異, 包括廠商進入新興產業可能性的高低, 以及影響進入時機的組織屬性, 而納入本研究之組織屬性, 包括組織在進入前產業經營的能耐、廠商的財務資源, 以及其財務績效。本研究運用這三個組織屬性, 以及橫跨13個產業的141家廠商, 加以探討其對廠商進入新興產業之行為的影響。實證結果顯示 (1) 高研究發展密度的廠商有較高的進入新興產業的可能性; (2) 財務績效表現不佳的廠商亦有較高的進入新興產業的可能性; (3) 研究發展密度高的廠商會較早進入新興產業; (4) 長期投資密度高的廠商會較早進入新興產業; 以及(5) 財務績效表現不佳的廠商亦會較早進入新興產業。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Entry has attracted considerable attention in the field of strategic management, but rarely little attention has been paid to study the entry to emerging industries. The digital revolution has pervaded current headlines as the advent of personal computer and cellular phone and their rapid technological advancements have transformed commercial practices and reshaped new industries in the past two decades. These emerging industries feature dynamic nature of formidable demand and technology development, and thus established firms face the decision of whether to and when to enter emerging product markets as well as the challenge of quickly leveraging and developing the capability necessary to enter the new markets.
This dissertation seeks to explain why firms vary in the likelihoods at which they enter an emerging industry and in the timing when they decide an entry into new product markets. Sampling 141 firms across 13 industries, we intend to study the organizational attributes of the firms entering these emerging industries and their entry strategies. Three emerging industries were chosen, including handset, PDA and digital still camera, in this research. Empirical results show that higher R&D intensity and poor performance of a firm will encourage managers to enter new product markets. In addition, a firm’s higher R&D intensity, higher long-term investment intensity and poor financial performance will lead managers to enter emerging industries earlier as well. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-14T17:00:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-D90724009-1.pdf: 438727 bytes, checksum: 94cb502462f9a33d12d73054bf82b7ed (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 2
ABSTRACT 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 9 1.1 Research Motivation 9 1.2 Research Questions 10 1.3 Research Design 12 Chapter 2 Literature Review 15 2.1 Diversifying Entry 16 2.2 Entry Likelihood 23 2.2.1 Background 23 2.2.2 Literature Review 25 2.3 Entry Timing 30 2.3.1 Background 30 2.3.2 Literature Review 31 2.4 The Case of DSC Industry 36 Chapter 3 Hypotheses 37 3.1 Hypotheses on Entry Likelihoods 38 3.2 Hypotheses on Entry Timing Choice 42 Chapter 4 Data and Methodology 47 4.1 Data 47 4.2 Methodology 48 4.2.1 Dependent Variables 48 4.2.2 Independent Variables 49 4.2.3 Model 1- Entry Likelihood 50 4.2.4 Model 2- Entry Timing Choice 51 Chapter 5 Results 53 Chapter 6 Discussion and Case Analysis 55 6.1 Discussion 55 6.2 Case Analysis 59 Chapter 7 Conclusion 63 Reference 73 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 能耐延伸 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 進入策略 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 新興產業 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 進入可能性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 進入時機 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Entry Strategy | en |
| dc.subject | Competence Leverage | en |
| dc.subject | Entry Timing | en |
| dc.subject | Entry Likelihoods | en |
| dc.subject | Emerging Industry | en |
| dc.title | 多角化進入新興產業策略之研究: 進入可能性與進入時機 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Diversifying Entry into Emerging Industries: Entry Likelihoods and Timing of Entry | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 于卓民,李吉仁,黃恆獎,王仕茹 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 進入策略,新興產業,進入可能性,進入時機,能耐延伸, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Entry Strategy,Emerging Industry,Entry Likelihoods,Entry Timing,Competence Leverage, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 77 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2008-07-30 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 國際企業學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-97-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 428.44 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。