請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/40509完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 曹承礎(Seng-Cho Chou) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Fu-Mei Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳富媺 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-14T16:49:42Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2013-08-17 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2011-08-17 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2011-08-12 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 英文文獻:
Alavi, M. and Leidner, D. (February, 1999) “Knowledge Management Systems: Issues, Challenges, and Benefits”, Communications of the AIS Vol. 1, Article 7 Arthur Andersen and The American Productivity and Quality Center (Winter 1996) The Knowledge Management Assessment Tool: External Benchmarking Version Beckman T. (1997) “A Methodology for Knowledge Management”, Proceeding of the IASTED International Conference on AI and Soft Computing Blackler, F. (1995) “Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation”, Organization Studies Vol. 16, No. 6, pp.1020-1046. Collins, H. M. (Spring 1993) “The Structure of Knowledge”, Social Research Vol. 93, No. 1, pp.95-116. Davenport, T. H. and Prusak, L.(1998) “Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know”, Harvard Business School Press Ehms & Langen (2002) “Holistic Development of Knowledge Management with KMMM” Siemens AG / Corporate Technology Knowledge Management & Business Transformation” Gabor Klimko (2001) “Knowledge management and Maturity Models: Building Commmon Understanding” Second European Conference on Knowledge Management, pp. 269-278 John Robert Anderson (1985) “The adaptive character of thought” KPMG (2000) “Knowledge management research report” Marquardt M. (1996) “Building the Learning Organization”, McGraw Hill Michael Earl (2001) “Knowledge Management Strategies: Toward a Taxonomy”, Journal of Management Information Systems Vol.18, No.1, pp.215-233. Michael H. Zack (1999) “Developing a Knowledge Strategy” CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW VOL. 41, NO. 3 pp.125-145. Morten T. Hansen, NItin Nohria, and Thomas Tierney (1999) “What is your strategy for managing knowledge”, Harvard Business Review Vol.77, No.2. Nonaka, I. (Nov/Dec, 1991) “The Knowledge-Creating Company”, Harvard Business Review Vol. 69, No. 6, pp.96-104. Nonaka, I. (February, 1994) “A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation”, Organization Science Vol. 5, No. 1, pp.14-37. Peyman Akhavan , Mostafa Jafari, Mohammad Fathian (2005)“Exploring Failure-Factors Of Implementing Knowledge Management Systems In Organizations” Journal of Knowledge Management Practice Polanyi, M.(1967) “The Tacit Dimension”, Anchor Thomas H. Davenport, David W. De Long, and Michael C. Beers (1998) “Successful Knowledge Management Projects”, Sloan Management Review Vol.39, No.2, pp.43-57. Tuomi, I. (Winter 1999/2000) “Data Is More than Knowledge: Implications of the Reversed Knowledge Hierarchy for Knowledge Management and Organizational Memory”, Journal of Management Information Systems Vol. 16, No. 3, pp.103-117. V. P. Kochikar (2000) “The Knowledge Management Maturity Model: A stage Framework for Leveraging Knowledge” 洪英訓 (2009)“Knowledge Management Adoption, Capability, and Assessment For SMEs” 中文文獻: 林東清 著(July 25, 2003) 知識管理 智勝出版社 謝宜倩 (2004) “以知識管理流程觀點建構知識管理成熟度模型之研究” 國立台灣大學資訊管理學系碩士學位論文 劉信志 (2000) “知識管理參考模式之研究” 國立台北科技大學商業自動化與管理研究所碩士學位論文 吳壽進 (2001) “企業導入知識管理系統之評估模式研究-評估因素及評估程序之觀點” 中原大學企業管理學系碩士學位論文 張紹勳 著(2000) 研究方法 滄海書局 網路資料: 科技產業資訊室-品質機能展開http://cdnet.stpi.org.tw/techroom/analysis/pat_A106.htm | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/40509 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究目的在於探討企業的知識管理需求與其知識管理成熟度之關聯性。本研究採用質性研究之個案研究法,深入探討目前已導入知識管理的企業現況,瞭解企業對知識管理的目標、需求、知識管理流程,以及知識管理成熟度,提供本研究建立一套更有效率,以分析出企業的知識管理需求與知識管理成熟度之關聯性的架構。本研究以產業多樣化的方式,訪談個案對象涉及政府機關、服務業、工程業、醫療業、銀行業、電視購物業等,讓本研究之研究方法都可在各個產業、各種類型的組織都可以應用。
研究結果發現,每間企業對知識管理的定義、需求都有所不同,連帶影響對知識管理的需求也會有所不同,在以企業需求為前提下,去探討知識管理需求構面所重視的權重也會有所不同,顯示出在探討知識管理等議題,不能以普遍化的方式去套用在每間企業情境上。在知識管理成熟度上,目前大部分的企業都尚未達到最高階層,但也顯示出知識管理的能力不應以追求最高為目標,而是以追求最適合為目標,也代表企業在發展知識管理計畫,還是應以企業的需求為主要考量。知識管理成熟模型可以用來分析企業目前在知識管理上的發展程度,以及還有哪些是可以繼續加強和改善的參考指標,但也許不會是唯一正確的參考。在探討知識管理需求與成熟度的關聯度部份,絕大部份的企業的知識管理成熟模型上的實務能力並非完全與知識管理需求是有高關聯度的,透過品質機能展開,明顯看出實務能力和需求之間的關聯度,提供企業可以針對與需求有高關聯度的能力去提升,彌補其他較低關聯度的能力,以滿足所有知識管理需求。本研究結論部分提供了實務面的研究貢獻,使用品質機能展開方法,可做為企業管理者在評估知識管理需求與成熟度的關聯度的有效的方法。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This research’s object is to discover the association between enterprises’ knowledge management needs and maturity. This research adopts the qualitative research – case study to deeply discuss enterprise’s situation for those imported knowledge management, to understand the goal, need, process and the maturity of knowledge management for enterprises, and eventually to construct a more efficient framework for analyzing the relationship between knowledge management need and maturity. This research has concerned about industry diversity, including government agency, service, engineering industry, medical industry, banking, and TV shopping industry, to make the research method be able to apply to every kind of industry, and every type of organization.
The research result shows that every enterprise’s definition and need for knowledge management are totally different, therefore the need for knowledge management varies among enterprises. On the premise of enterprise’s need, the weights of different aspects for discussing knowledge management needs are also different. This shows that there’s no general method to apply to every enterprises’ situation when we make discussion on the issue of knowledge management. About the knowledge management maturity, the levels of knowledge management maturity for most cases haven’t reached the highest level yet. It shows that we are not seeking for the highest level of knowledge management capability but for the fittest one. And it also shows that when the enterprise has knowledge management plan, we should take the enterprise’s need as major concern. The knowledge management maturity model can be used to analyze the enterprise’s knowledge management development level, and to find out if there’s anything should be improved or refined. But it might not be the only index. After analyzing the association between knowledge management need and maturity, capability in practice can’t have high association with needs for most cases. Based on Quality Function Deployment, we can see the association between practice capabilities and needs clearly. It provides enterprise to improve some capabilities that have high association with needs, to make up the others, and to fit all knowledge management needs. This research provides practical research comment and uses Quality Function Deployment to be the efficient way to measure the association between knowledge management needs and maturity | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-14T16:49:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R98725017-1.pdf: 1225992 bytes, checksum: 2141c15bdeaf0ae2860c70e04f5a7b83 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝 I
論文大綱 II THESIS ABSTRACT III 目錄 V 圖次 VI 表次 VII 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究動機與目的 1 1.2 研究流程 2 第二章 文獻回顧 4 2.1 品質機能展開 4 2.2 知識與知識管理 6 2.2.1 知識定義 6 2.2.2. 知識的分類 6 2.2.3. 知識管理定義 8 2.2.4. 知識管理流程 9 2.3. 成熟度模型與知識管理成熟模型 11 2.3.1. 成熟度模型 11 2.3.2. 知識管理成熟度模型 11 第三章 研究方法 22 3.1 研究架構 22 3.1.1 知識管理需求 22 3.1.2 知識管理成熟度 24 3.1.3 品質機能展開 27 3.2 研究設計 29 3.2.1 研究方法-個案研究法 29 3.2.2 訪談研究流程 30 3.2.3 訪談對象 31 第四章 個案分析與研究結果 32 4.1 個案分析 32 4.2 研究結果 77 第五章 研究討論與結論 82 5.1 研究討論 82 5.2 研究結論與實務貢獻 84 5.3 研究限制與未來研究方向 85 參考文獻 87 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 品質機能展開 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 知識管理 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 個案研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 知識管理成熟模型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Knowledge Management | en |
| dc.subject | Quality Function Deployment | en |
| dc.subject | Knowledge Management Maturity Model | en |
| dc.subject | Case Study | en |
| dc.title | 建構企業知識管理需求與成熟度關聯分析之架構 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Constructing a Framework for the Association between Enterprises’ Knowledge Management Needs and Maturity | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 許瑋元,陳鴻基 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 知識管理,個案研究,知識管理成熟模型,品質機能展開, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Knowledge Management,Case Study,Knowledge Management Maturity Model,Quality Function Deployment, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 89 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2011-08-12 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 資訊管理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 資訊管理學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-100-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.2 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
