請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/39539完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 李蘭 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu-Fang Lai | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 賴玉芳 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T17:31:12Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2011-10-03 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2011-10-03 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2011-07-08 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分
成露茜 & 羅曉南主編 (2009)。批判的媒體識讀 (pp. 18-22)。台北：正中書局。 何宜錚、黃鴻程、陳學志、王雅萍、賴惠德 (2010)。國中生幽默風格與自尊及情緒智力之相關研究。中華心理衛生學刊，23(3)，271-304。 何茉如、林世華 (2000)。國中生幽默感對於生活壓力、身心健康之調節作用。教育心理學報，32(1)，123-156。 吳知賢 (2002)。國小兒童收看電視綜藝節目及綜藝節目識讀教學成效之探討。國民教育研究集刊，8，125-179。 李蘭、江宜珍、邱玉蟬、鄭其嘉、吳文琪、楊蕙如 (2008)。國中生的幽默概念及表現類型：焦點團體討論結果。台灣衛誌，27(6)，519-529。 李蘭、洪百薰、楊雪華、童淑琴、晏涵文 (2000)。以成長團體介入提昇高職學生拒藥能力之成效。醫學教育，4(3)，340-352。 李蘭等 (2010)。健康行為與健康教育 (pp. 104-106)。台北: 巨流圖書公司。 陳漢瑛 (2008)。臺灣原住民青少年用藥行為之結構模式：族群認同、人格特質、社會學習、用藥信念等影響因素。教育心理學報，39(3)，335-354。 英文部分 Abel, M. H. (2002). Humor, stress, and coping strategies. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 15(4), 365. Akers, R., & Lee, G. (1996). A longitudinal test of social learning theory: adolescent smoking. Journal of Drug Issues 26, 317-343. Aufderheide, P. (1993). Media literacy: A report of the national leadership conference on media literacy. Aspen, CO: Aspen Institute. Austin, E. W., & Johnson, K. K. (1997). Immediate and Delayed Effects of Media Literacy Training on Third Grader's Decision Making for Alcohol. Health Communication, 9(4), 323-349. Bergsma, L. J., & Carney, M. E. (2008). Effectiveness of health-promoting media literacy education: a systematic review. Health Education. Research, 23(3), 522-542. Berk, R. A., & Nanda, J. (2006). A randomized trial of humor effects on test anxiety and test performance. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 19(4), 425-454. Buckingham, D. (2003) Media education: literacy, learning, and contemporary culture: Cambridge, England:Polity. Buckingham, D. (2005). The Media Literacy of Children and Young. People: A Review of the Research Literature. London,England: Ofcom. Cook, P. F., Green, E. E., & Rogers, K. (1983). Teaching interpersonal skills through behavior modeling. amcap 29, 18-26. Davies, J. (1993). The impact of the mass media upon the health of early adolescents. Journal of Health Education, 24(6), 28-35. Davis, S. M., Going, S. B., Helitzer, D. L., Teufel, N. I., Snyder, P., Gittelsohn, J., et al. (1999). Pathways: a culturally appropriate obesity-prevention program for American Indian schoolchildren.the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 69(4), 796-802. Fry, W. F. (1994). The biology of humor. Humor - International Journal of Humor Research, 7(2), 111-126. Hallam, J. S., & Petosa, R. (2004). The Long-Term Impact of a Four-Session Work-Site Intervention on Selected Social Cognitive Theory Variables Linked to Adult Exercise Adherence. Health Education & Behavior, 31(1), 88-100. Hill, S. C., & Lindsay, G. B. (2003). Using Health Infomercials to Develop Media Literacy Skills. Journal of School Health, 73(6), 239. Irving, L. M., & Berel, S. R. (2001). Comparison of Media-Literacy Programs to Strengthen College Women's Resistance to Media Images. Psychology of Women, 25(2), 103-111. Jane, D. B. (2006). Media Literacy Has Potential to Improve Adolescents’ Health. The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 39(4), 459-460. Janus, S. S. (1975). The great comedians: Personality and other factors. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 35(2), 169-174. Ko, C.-H., Yen, J.-Y., Liu, S.-C., Huang, C.-F., & Yen, C.-F. (2009). The Associations Between Aggressive Behaviors and Internet Addiction and Online Activities in Adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 44(6), 598-605. Kuiper, N. A., & Nicholl, S. (2004). Thoughts of feeling better? Sense of humor and physical health. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 17(1/2), 37-66. Lefcourt, H. M. (2002). Humor. In S. J. L. In C.R. Snyder (Ed.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 619-631). New York: Oxford University Press. Martin, R. A. (2001). Humor, laughter, and physical health: Methodological issues and research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(4), 504-519. Martin, R. A. (2002). Is Laughter the Best Medicine? Humor, Laughter, and Physical Health. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(6), 216-220. Martin, R. A., Kuiper, N. A., Olinger, L. J., & Dance, K. A. (1993). Humor, coping with stress, self-concept, and psychological well-being. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 6, 89-104. Martin, R. A., & Lefcourt, H. M. (1983). Sense of humor as a moderator of the relation between stressors and moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(6), 1313-1324. Martin, R. A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., & Weir, K. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(1), 48-75. McClelland, D. C., & Cheriff, A. D. (1997). The immunoenhancing effects of humor on secretory IgA and resistance to respiratory infections. Psychology & Health, 12(3), 329 - 344. Neziroglu, F., Khemlani-Patel, S., & Veale, D. (2008). Social learning theory and cognitive behavioral models of body dysmorphic disorder. Body Image, 5(1), 28-38. Nezlek, J. B., & Derks, P. (2001). Use of humor as a coping mechanism, psychological adjustment and social interaction. Humor - International Journal of Humor Research, 14(4), 395-413. Norrick, N. R., & Spitz, A. (2008). Humor as a resource for mitigating conflict in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(10), 1661-1686. Pinkleton, B. E., Austin, E. W., Cohen, M., Miller, A., & Fitzgerald, E. (2007). A Statewide Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Media Literacy Training to Prevent Tobacco Use Among Adolescents. Health Communication, 21(1), 23-34. Powell, J. P., & Andresen, L. W. (1985). Humour and teaching in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 10(1), 79 - 90. Potter, W. (2008). Media Literacy 4th edition. New York: Sage Publications. Scharrer, E. (2009). Measuring the Effects of a Media Literacy Program on Conflict and Violence. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 1(1), 12-27. Schinke, S. P., Schwinn, T. M., & Fang, L. (2010). Longitudinal Outcomes of an Alcohol Abuse Prevention Program for Urban Adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 46(5), 451-457. Stanton, B. F., Xiaoming, L., Black, M. M., Ricardo, I., Galbraith, J., Feigelman, S., et al. (1996). Longitudinal stability and predictability of sexual perceptions, intentions, and behaviors among early adolescent African-Americans. Journal of Adolescent Health, 18(1), 10-19. Strasburger, V. C. (2009). Children, adolescents and the media: what we know, what we don’t know and what we need to find out (quickly!). Archives of Disease in Childhood, 94(9), 655-657. Vooijs, M. W., & van der Voort, T. H. A. (1993). Teaching Children to Evaluate Television Violence Critically: the impact of a Dutch schools television project. Journal of Educational Television, 19(3), 139 - 152. Wade, T. D., Davidson, S., & O'Dea, J. A. (2003). A Preliminary Controlled Evaluation of a School-Based Media Literacy Program and Self-Esteem Program for Reducing Eating Disorder Risk Factors. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 33(4), 371-383. Yip, J. A., & Martin, R. A. (2006). Sense of humor, emotional intelligence, and social competence. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(6), 1202-1208. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/39539 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 一、研究目的
透過自行設計的課程以提升國中生之幽默識讀能力，使他們能夠判別幽默訊息的合宜性，並以適當的方式表現幽默。 二、材料與方法 本研究採準實驗研究設計。立意選取實習單位作為研究場域，從八年級的班級中，選取四個班級，這些班級的全體學生為研究樣本。其中，兩班為「實驗組」；另外兩班為「校內對照組」。為避免實驗擴散造成之干擾，從鄰近一所性質及規模相近的國中，再選取兩班八年級學生，當作「校外對照組」。實驗組參與每週一次，每次一節，共五週之幽默識讀課程；校內對照組和校外對照組並未參與相同課程。為探討介入課程的有效性，以自製問卷，在實驗前、實驗剛結束、結束一個月後，分別進行前測、後測及後後測。所有資料完成連結之後，使用SAS9.2版軟體進行統計分析。最後，以複迴歸分析控制個人與環境因素後，驗證介入對提升實驗組之「幽默識讀能力」，同時具有立即效果與延宕效果。 三、結果與建議 本研究發現，「實驗組」在五次課程剛結束，以及結束一個月後，幽默識讀能力明顯高於「校內對照組」與「校外對照組」。也就是說，實驗課程具有良好的介入效果。在課程回饋方面，實驗組學生給予高度評價，表示上課能實際提升其對幽默技巧的理解與應用，也能幫助其增進人際關係。因此，建議將本研究執行之幽默識讀課程推廣到其他國中。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | 1.Aims
The purpose of this study was to enhance adolescents’ humor literacy. Through designed courses, adolescents were able to judge if a humorous information is appropriate or not, and to express humor in appropriate way. 2.Material and method Based on quasi-experimental design, four classes of the eighth graders in the internship unit were chosen as the sample. Two classes were assigned as the experimental group while the other two as the control. In order to avoid interference spreading, another two classes of the eighth graders from a nearby school with similar size and nature were selected as the outside control group. Courses that enhance the humor literacy were intervened in the experiment group, an hour a week for five weeks. To evaluate the immediate and extended effects of experimental intervention, pretest, post test and post-post test were implemented by structured questionnaires. Multiple regression analysis was used to validate the immediate and extened effects of intervention. 3.Results and suggestions After intervention and one month later, the humor literacy of the experimental group is significantly higher than that of the inside and outside controls. That is to say, the self-designed courses are effective for enhancing the students’ humor literacy. Furthermore, students of experimental groups offer a high appraisal in curriculum feedback. They expressed that they had further understanding and higher application of humor skills and built better interpersonal relationships with others. Thus, it was suggested to promote the humor literacy courses to other junior high schools. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T17:31:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R98847010-1.pdf: 3606525 bytes, checksum: 8a70460ae3d0a57f1819429f4bb3c34c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書……………………………………………………………………i
誌謝……………………………………………………………………………………ⅱ 摘要……………………………………………………………………………………ⅲ 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第三節 實習單位簡介 3 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 幽默表現與健康的關係 5 第二節 幽默識讀能力的定義與內涵 7 第三節 社會認知理論的概念及應用 9 第四節 介入活動提升識讀能力的效果 11 第三章 材料與方法 第一節 研究架構 12 第二節 研究設計 14 第三節 研究樣本 15 第四節 研究工具 16 第五節 資料分析 26 第四章 結果 第一節 研究樣本的特質 27 第二節 實驗前研究樣本的幽默識讀能力 30 第三節 實驗前研究樣本幽默識讀能力之相關因素 33 第四節 實驗介入後之效果 34 第五節 實驗組學生對於實驗課程的意見 40 第五章 討論 第一節 幽默識讀課程實驗後的效果 43 第二節 幽默識讀能力之相關因素與應用 45 第三節 研究結果在實習單位的應用 46 第四節 研究限制 47 第六章 結論與建議 第一節 結論 48 第二節 建議 50 參考文獻 中文部分 52 英文部分 52 附錄一、幽默識讀課程教案…………………………………………………………57 附錄二、國中生幽默識讀能力調查問卷……………………………………………82 附錄三、幽默達人系列課程回饋表…………………………………………………88 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 提升國中生幽默識讀能力之實驗研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | An Experimental Study on Enhancing Junior High School Students’Humor Literacy | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 賴美淑 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳雲嬌,江宜珍 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 幽默,青少年,識讀能力, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | humor,adolescent,literacy, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 91 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2011-07-08 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 公共衛生碩士學位學程 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 公共衛生碩士學位學程 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-100-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.52 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。