請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/39467
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 鄭守夏 | |
dc.contributor.author | Hsiu-Fang Yu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 余秀芳 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T17:29:14Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2004-08-03 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2004-08-03 | |
dc.date.issued | 2003 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2004-07-26 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文部份
1.王少谷、廖訓禎、胡百敏、馬雲鵬、張玉龍、葉時烊、金霍歌、王佐才、彭錦池:急診 轉診制度執行現況之探討---以某區域醫院及某地區醫院之經驗為例。中華民國急診醫學會 醫誌,2002;4(2):82-90。 2.王欽程:轉診制度--不可能任務嗎?高雄醫師會誌,2000;30:51-53。 3.王俐人:一級教學醫院勞保住診病人醫療利用情況及其影響因素之研究。國立陽明大學 公共衛生研究所碩士論文,1988。 4.王香蘋:影響我國分級轉診制度發展因素的探討。弘光學報,2002;11:45-51。 5.行政院衛生署,統計資料查詢系統網址:http://www.doh.gov.tw/statistic/index.htm 。 6.林照姬、王泰隆:臺北市忠孝醫院轉診個案相關因素探討。醫院,1996;29(5):21-32 。 7.林興裕:論病例計酬支付制度對醫療服務使用之影響—以公保白內障手術為例。台灣大 學公共衛生研究所碩士論文,1996。 8.吳中興、呂碧鴻、謝維銓:醫學中心家庭醫師轉診行為暨結果之研究--以臺大醫院為例 。中華民國家庭醫學雜誌,1991;1(4):201-209。 9.吳俊儀:台灣地區重複醫療資源使用相關因素分析。長庚大學管理學研究所碩士論文 ,2000。 10.許文燦、蔡佩玲、許勝雄、余幸司、劉宏文、Lee, Isaiah:An analysis of referral initiative, severity, and the return of older population in a tertiary teaching hospital。醫學研究,1999;19(4):210-218。 11.高榮志、吳至行、張智仁:轉診行為之研究—以某醫學中心家庭醫學部二個月之初診病 患為例。中華家庭醫學雜誌,1996;6(1):41-51。 12.洪維河:病人住院日數與住院費用的關係—以DRG155為例。國立臺灣大學公共衛生學研 究所碩士論文,1991。 13.邱震山:住院病人資源利用率分析:以DRG323、DRG324為例。國立陽明大學醫務管理研 究所碩士論文,1996。 14.莊逸洲,從全民福祉談全民健保之改制。全民健保三週年回顧與展望研討會,1998。 15.莊逸洲:前瞻性支付制度下醫院管理模式之建立與實證。中國醫藥學院醫務管理研究所 碩士論文,1995。 16.陳詩茵:轉診住院病患醫療資源耗用之初探。國立台灣大學醫療機構管理研究所碩士論 文,1997。 17.陳楚杰:醫院組織與管理。宏翰文化事業公司,1992。 18.張苙雲:「逛醫師」的邏輯:求醫歷程的分析。臺灣社會學刊,1998;21:59-87。 19.楊志良,全民健保體制改革之省思,台灣地區實施全民健保二週年紀念特刊,1997 ,P186-189。 20.簡聰建:某省立醫院之住院日與住院費用分析-為發展臺灣版DRGs之啟示。國立臺灣大 學公共衛生學研究所碩士論文,1991。 21.劉岱瑋:住院日數與費用分佈決定因素及醫療利用分析--以經尿道前列腺切除術(TUR- P)為例。國立臺灣大學公共衛生學研究所碩士論文,1996。 22.盧瑞芬、謝啟瑞:醫療經濟學。學富事業文化有限公司,2000。 23.錢慶文、黃三桂:論病例計酬制度對住院日數及醫療費用之影響--以痔瘡切除手術為例 。公共衛生,2000;26(4):303-317。 24.謝瀛華、林英欽、林章賢、洪清霖:基層醫療與轉診相關因子之探討。公共衛生1995 ;21(4):213-219。 英文部份 1.Anderson R and Anderson OW. A decade of health services. Chicago University of Chicago Press. 1976. 2.Ansell DA, Schiff RL. “Patient dumping status, implications, and policy recommendations.” Journal of the American Medical Association, 1987; 257(11): 1500-1502. 3.Berliner HS. “Patient dumping--no one wins and we all lose.” American Journal of Public Health, 1988; 78(10): 1279-1280. 4.Bernard AM, Hayward RA, Rosevear J, Chun H, McMahon LF. “Comparing the hospitalizations of transfer and non-transfer patients in an academic medical center.” Academic Medicine, 1996; 71(3): 262-266. 5.Buczko W. “Inpatient transfer episodes among aged Medicare beneficiaries.” Health Care Financing Review, 1993; 15(2): 71-87. 6.Campbell E, Ahern M. “Have Pro-competition changes altered hospital provision of indigent care” Health Economics, 1993; 2(3): 281-289. 7.Carey K. “A Multilevel modeling approach to analysis of patient costs under manager care” Health Economics, 2000; 9: 435-446. 8.Dranove D, “Rate-setting by DRG and hospital specialization.” Rand Journal of Economics, 1987; 18(3): 417-427. 9.Enfield L, Sklar D. ”Patient dumping in the hospital emergency department: Renewed interest in an old problem.” American Journal of Law and Medicine, 1988; 13(4): 561-695. 10.Falcone D, Warren DG. “The shadow price of pluralism: the use of tax expenditures to subsidize hospital care in the United States.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy & Law. 1988; 13(4): 735-752. 11.Feldman R. “The ability of manager care to control health care costs: how much is enough?” Journal Health Care Financial, 2000; 2: 15-25. 12.Friedman E. “The 'dumping' dilemma: the poor are always with some of us.” Hospitals, 1982; 56(17): 51-56. 13.Friedman E. “Problems plaguing public hospitals: uninsured patient transfers, tight funds, mismanagement and misperception.” Journal of American Medical Association, 1987; 257(14): 1850-1857. 14.Gray B, Field M. “Controlling costs and changing patient care? The role of utilization management .” Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 15.Gruber J. “The effect of competitive pressure on charity: hospital responses to price shopping in California.” Journal of Health Economics, 1994; 13(2): 183-212. 16.Hurley J, Linz D, Swint E. “Assessing the effects of the Medicare Prospective Payment System on the demand for VA inpatient services: an examination of transfers and discharges of problem patients.” Health Services Research, 1990; 25(1 Pt 2): 239-255. 17.Kellermann AL, Hackman BB. “Emergency department patient 'dumping': an analysis of interhospital transfers to the Regional Medical Center at Memphis, Tennessee.” American Journal of Public Health, 1988; 78(10): 1287-1292. 18.Himmelstein DU, Woolhandler S, Harnly M, Bader MB, Silber R, Backer HD, Jones AA. “Patient transfers: medical practice as social triage.” American Journal of Public Health, 1984; 74(5):494-497. 19.Kerr H, Byrd J, Stuart R, Whitcomb J. “Interhospital transfers, the COBRA law(1985), and the use of a public assistance health plan.” Southern Medical Journal, 1993; 86(11): 1210-1214. 20.Lew I. “Days of the week and other variables affecting hospital admission, discharge and length of stay for patients on the Pittsburgh area.” Inquiry, 1986; 3(1): 3-39. 21.Lin HC, Yang CH, Tung YC, Chang WY. “Comparing costs and hospital ownership for thyroidectomy patients.” New Taipei Journal of Medicine, 2002; 4(2): 99-107. 22.Lin HC, Chen CC, Kuo NW, Chang YP. “A review of the literature on patient dumping” New Taipei Journal of Medicine, 2002; 4(3): 145-150. 23.Litwin MS, Kahn KL, Reccius N. ”Why does sicker patients cost more? A charge-based analysts patients undergoing prostatectomy. ” Journal of Urology, 1993; 149(1): 84-88. 24.Long MJ, Fleming ST, Chesney JD. ”The impact of diagnosis related group profitability on the skimming and dumping of psychiatric diagnosis related groups.” The International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 1993; 39(2): 108-120. 25.Marchette L, Holloman F. “Length of stay significant variables.” Journal of nursing administration, 1986; 16(3): 12-19. 26.Marmor T, Schlesinger M, Smithey R. “A new look at nonprofits: health care policy in the competitive age.” Yale Journal of Regulation, 1986; 3(2): 313- 350. 27.McCorkle LP. “Utilization of facilities of a university hospital: length of inpatient stay in various hospital departments.” Health Service Rsearch, 1996; 1: 91-114. 28.Melnick GA, Zwanziger J, Bamezai A, Pattison R. “The effects of market structure and bargaining position on hospital prices.” Journal of Health Economics, 1992; 11(3): 217-233. 29.Menke T. ”Impacts of PPS on Medicare Part B expenditures and utilization for hospital episodes of care.” Inquiry, 1990; 27(2): 114-126. 30.Morrisey MA.” Competition in hospital and health insurance markets:a review and research agenda” Health Service Research, 2001; 37: 457-482. 31.Newhouse JP. “Do unprofitable patients face access problems? ” Health Care Financing Review, 1989; 11(2): 33-42. 32.Relman AS. ”Texas eliminates dumping. A start toward equity in hospital care. ” New England Journal of Medicine, 1986; 314(9): 578-579. 33.Rhodes RS, Karsniak CL, Jones PK. “Factors affecting length of stay for femoropopliteal bypass. ” New England Journal of Medicine, 1986; 314(3): 153- 157. 34.Robinson JC, Luft HS. “The impact of hospital market structure on patient volume, average length of stay , and the cost of care.” Journal of Health Economics, 1985; 4(4): 333-356. 35.Rogers JL, Feinglass J, Martin GJ, Hughes RL, Handler I, Stoms GB. ”Longer hospitalization at Veterans administration hospitals than private hospitals.” Medical Care, 1989; 27(10): 928-936. 36.Schiff RL, Ansell DA, Schlosser JE, Idris AH, Morrison A, Whitman S. “ Transfers to a public hospital. A prospective study of 467 patients.” New England Journal of Medicine, 1986; 314(9): 552-557. 37.Schlesinger M, Bentkover J, Blumenthal D, Musacchio R, Willer J. “The privatization of health care and physicians' perceptions of access to hospital services.” Milbank Quarterly, 1987; 65(1): 25-58. 38.Schlesinger M, Dorwart R, Hoover C, Epstein S. ”The determinants of dumping : a national study of economically motivated transfer involving mental health care.” Health Services Research, 1997; 32(5): 561-590. 39.Shortell SM. ”Factor associated with the use of health service, edited by S. J. Williams. ” Introduction to health Services, 1984. 40.Sloan FA, Morrisey MA, Valvona J. “Case shifting and the Medicare Prospective Payment System.” American Journal of Public Health, 1988; 78(5): 553-556. 41.Smeby B. et al. “Admission rate and length for nonspecific enteritis in Pediatric Department in Sweden” Health Service Research, 1972; 2: 537-550. 42.Stenobrook R. “Hospital ‘dumping’ of poor : lawmakers seek a cure.” LA. Times, 1986. 43.Suchman E. “Stages of illness and medical care ” Journal of Health and Human Behavior, 1965; 6: 114-128. 44.Thorpe K, Brecher C. “Improving access to care for the uninsured poor in large cities: do public hospitals make a difference? ” Journal of Health Politics, Policy & Law, 1987; 12(2): 313-324. 45.Weissman JS. ”Commentary:economic transfers, the change face of a familiar problem” Health Service Research, 1997; 32: 591-598. 46.Wrenn K. “No insurance, no admission.” New England Journal of Medicine, 1985; 313(7): 373-374. 47.Wyatt SM, Moy E, Levin RJ, Lawton KB, Witter DM, Valente E, Lala R, Griner PF. “Patients transferred to academic medical centers and other hospitals: characteristics, resource use, and outcomes.” Academic Medicine, 1997; 72( 10): 921-930. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/39467 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 健保自從開辦後,在近幾年來一直面臨沉重的財務負擔,在各項因應對策及相關研究中,
對於醫療資源是否有濫用及浪費的情形,特別令人重視。另一方面,回顧美國1980年代後 ,實施一系列的醫療政策改革,使得原本成長快速的醫療費用得以有效控制,但在成功改 革同時,「病人推移」的問題也日益受到重視。而在台灣的醫療體系中,是否有醫療資源 重複使用,和所謂的「病人推移」現象,為本篇研究所欲探討的重點。 本研究參考TQIP所訂定之指標,以「非計畫性重複住院者為研究對象」,探討本篇三個研 究目的: 1.描述台灣地區非計畫性重複住院之現況,及其相關特性分佈 2.分析非計畫性重複住院的醫療資源使用之狀況,並評估醫療資源重複使用現象 3.探討台灣地區是否有「病人推移」的現象 本研究結果如下: 1. 2000年非計畫性重複住院者,約佔全國住院人數的3.6%。病患年齡越高及疾病次診斷數 越多者,越容易重複住院。重複住院者之轉歸代碼,改門診治療加治療出院所佔比例均高 達75%以上,而因轉診而重複住診者只佔11%。隨著醫院層級越高,其所看診之病人屬於重 複就診者之比例亦越高,且重複住院者有往高層級就醫之趨勢。重複住院者其第一次就診 ,以在私立醫院所佔比例最多,其次是法人醫院;而重複住院者有往法人醫院、公立醫院 就醫的趨勢。地區資源高、中、低地區的重複住院比例是相差不大的。重複住院者中各種 不同之就醫類型,並無集中在某些特定疾病上之現象,腦動脈阻塞、糖尿病、肺炎為重複 住院者中各種不同之就醫類型之三大常見疾病。愈低層級醫院(地區醫院)主要為提供後續 照護性(after care)之醫療服務。 2.「重複住診於相同醫院者」的確比「重複住診於不同醫院者」,有較少醫療資源重複使 用之情形。而經由轉診而重複住診者,並不會減少醫療資源的重複使用。另外,從本研究 中稍微可以看出有刮脂效應(cream skimming)之情況發生,尤其是在放射線診察服務項目 上。 3.本研究沒有發現權屬別不同,其「轉出」的比例有不同存在,而醫學中心層級之公立醫 院,的確具有較高之「轉入」比例。在控制其他變項之後,發現被推移病人其病患年齡、 疾病次診斷數、急性病床住院天數,及各項醫療費用的確比較高。本研究因為無法直接得 知病人之轉出、轉入原因,因此,醫院是否為shifting或dumping的證據有限。 在本研究中,以重複「就診於不同醫院者」做為分析病人推移之研究對象,及利用「轉出 」、「轉入」之研究設計來判斷是否有病人推移之現象,雖不能直接證明其就是病人推移 之行為,不過仍可證明本研究所定義的「非計畫性重複住院」之住診於不同醫院者,的確 會造成醫療資源重複使用。而不管「重複就診於不同醫院」的現象是否為病人推移行為產 生的,從醫療供給面思考民眾的求醫行為,亦是需要注意的重點。 在國內有醫院層級之分的醫療體系下,造成轉診制度容許低層級醫院可將病人轉診至較高 層級之醫院,廣義的來說,也就是等於默許低層級醫院將病人推移至高層級醫院。但在此 政策目標之下,由於轉診制度設計的不夠健全,造成醫療體系之分級醫療功能不彰,所以 若是當病患被轉診或被推移至高層級醫院就診時,並不能真正的減少醫療資源的重複使用 。因此,造成轉診病患、或者是說政策所容許的病人推移現象,反而造成更嚴重的醫療資 源重複使用之現象。因此,在國內不只病人推移現象,而影響病人醫療可近性之問題值得 注意,其對於醫療資源重複使用之影響更是不可忽視。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Since Taiwan National Health Insurance program was established, it has had
heavy financial burdens. The related studies pointed the most important cause to result in financial burdens is that medical resources are wasted and abused. After 1980’s, America implemented a serious of health policies, and successfully controlled medical expenditures that were increasing quickly at that time. During these reforms, the problem of “patient dumping” was noticed by people. In the study, we want to explore whether it has the phenomenon in repeating to use medical resources and patient dumping in Taiwan Health system. This study refers to 'unscheduled readmission' which is one of the indicators made by TQIP. Based on it, there are three purposes of the study. 1. Describing the phenomenon of unscheduled readmission and its related features. 2. Analyzing the phenomenon of repeating to use medical resources which was resulted from unscheduled readmissions. 3. Discussing whether it has the phenomenon of patient dumping in Taiwan. Major findings of this study are as follows: 1. In 2000 years, unscheduled readmissions are 3.6 percent of national admissions. The diseases of unscheduled readmissions aren’t concentrated on certain some, but cerebral vascular accident, diabetes mellitus, pneumonia are the most common diseases. 2. Unscheduled readmissions in different hospitals really less repeat to use medical resources than unscheduled readmissions in the same hospital, and unscheduled readmission patients who are referred do not decreasely repeat to use medical resources. On the other hand, this study slightly finds the “ cream skimming” phenomenon, especially in radioactive processes. 3. After controlling other variables, this study finds that unscheduled readmissions patients who are dumped almost have higher age, more other diagnoses, more length of stay, and more medical expenditures. The data, however, cannot access the reasons that patients are dumped, so writer cannot directly suggest that hospitals have patient dumping behaviors. Despite unscheduled readmissions in difference hospitals phenomenon results from patient dumping, it is important from supply side to think the seeking behavior of people. In Taiwan it attaches great importance that patient dumping phenomenon not only has the influences on accessibility but also makes repeated medical resources using. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T17:29:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-92-R90845110-1.pdf: 605035 bytes, checksum: 807085e2cdd1d0afc667fc1dd0f0ffb1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2003 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝 I
摘 要 II Abstract IV 目 錄 V 表目錄 VII 圖目錄 VIII 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究緣起 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第三節 預期研究成果及重要性 5 第四節 名詞解釋及定義 6 第二章 文獻探討 11 第一節 醫療資源利用的測量及相關影響因素 11 第二節 轉診制度之探討 16 第三節 病人傾棄(Patient dumping)的理論及定義 20 第四節 病人傾棄(Patient dumping)國內外相關研究 27 第三章 研究設計與方法 35 第一節 研究材料 35 第二節 研究方法 38 第三節 研究變項與操作型定義 48 第四節 資料分析方法 49 第四章 研究結果 50 第一節 台灣地區非計畫性重複住院之現況 50 第二節 醫療資源重複使用之分析結果 69 第三節 病人推移(case shifting)現象之分析 84 第五章 綜合討論 90 第一節 研究限制 90 第二節 重複住院之分析 92 第三節 醫療資源重複使用之分析 98 第四節 病人推移之分析 104 第五節 總結 108 第六章 結論與建議 109 第一節 結論 109 第二節 建議 112 參考文獻 115 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 台灣地區病人重複住院之分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Analysis of Readmission in Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 91-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 林恆慶,楊長興, | |
dc.subject.keyword | 病人傾棄,重複住院,病人推移,醫療資源, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | case shifting,patient dumping,medical resources,Readmission, | en |
dc.relation.page | 122 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2004-07-26 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 衛生政策與管理研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 健康政策與管理研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-92-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 590.85 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。