請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/39272完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 丁志音(Chih-Yin Lew-Ting) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shu-Chen Kuo | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 郭淑珍 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T17:25:11Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2005-01-28 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2005-01-28 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2005-01-25 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分
丁志音、江東亮:以健康行為型態分類台灣地區之成年人口群—群聚分析之應用。中華衛誌 1996;15(3):175-187。 丁志音:田野方法與參與觀察在衛生教育上的運用與價值。譚文海(主編):衛生教育。台灣省公共衛生研究所,1992;70-94。 王仕圖、吳慧敏:深度訪談與案例演練。齊力、林本炫(主編):質性研究方法與資料分析。嘉義:華南大學教育社會學研究所,2003;95-113。 王淑貞:體力勞動工作與嚼食檳榔行為之研究:以嘉義縣市與雲林縣地區為例。嘉義:國立中正大學國際經濟研究所碩士論文,2001。 王蜀桂:台灣檳榔四季青。台北:常民文化,1996。 王燕惠:台灣地區原住民嚼食檳榔、吸菸、喝酒使用盛行率及其健康危害意識調查。高雄:高雄醫學大學口腔衛生科學研究所碩士論文,2002。 王麗雲(譯):意識型態與課程。台北:桂冠圖書股份有限公司,2002。(Apple MW. Ideology and Curriculum. 1990) 交通部統計處:台灣地區計程車營運狀況調查報告。台北:交通部統計處,2002。 朱妙慧:台灣地區成年男性物質使用行為的社會層級差異變遷。台北:台灣大學衛生政策與管理研究所碩士論文,2003。 行政院農業委員會:農業統計年報。台北:行政院農委會,2002。 行政院衛生署:中華民國公共衛生概況。台北:行政院衛生署,1996。 行政院衛生署:衛生白皮書。台北:行政院衛生署,1993。 吳成文:吳序。賴美淑(主編)、韓良俊(召集人):論壇健康促進與疾病預防委員會文獻回顧研析計畫:「檳榔嚼塊與口腔癌」。台北:國家衛生研究院,2000。 吳德敏、白璐、宋丕錕、蔡宗仁、徐黎玲、李旻貞、孫建安:抽菸、引酒與嚼檳榔習慣個人聚集之初探:以健康檢查族群為例。中華衛誌 1999;18(6):453-459。 李恬儀:檳榔商品化的形成與消費文化轉變之研究。台北:國立台灣大學森林研究所碩士論文,2004。 李蘭、林慧宜、晏涵文:預防國中生嚼檳榔之教育效果。醫學教育 1998; 2(1):49-64。 李蘭、晏涵文、劉潔心、關學婉、季瑋珠、林瑞雄:嚼檳榔預防教育先驅研究(Ⅰ)—國中生嚼檳榔現況及影響因素之初探。中華衛誌 1992a;11(4):285-294。 李蘭、劉潔心、晏涵文、陳麗鳳:嚼檳榔預防教育先驅研究(Ⅱ)—國中生嚼檳榔預防教學實驗。中華衛誌 1992b;11(4):295-303。 尚筱菁:彰化縣居民檳榔菸酒盛行率及相關影響因素研究。高雄:高雄醫學大學口腔衛生科學研究所碩士論文,2002。 林易超、柯政全、謝天渝:檳榔及其添加物致突變性之研究。台灣口腔醫誌 2000;16:273-295。 林信男:藥物濫用演義。林信男(主編),藥物濫用與防治。台北:橘井文化,1997;1-8。 林奕鼎:檳榔文化作為一個鬥爭的場域。台中:東海大學社會學研究所碩士論文,2003。 林琴惠:花蓮縣(市)居民檳榔、菸、酒盛行率及其健康危害意識調查。高雄:高雄醫學大學口腔衛生科學研究所碩士論文,2002。 林德福:區域不平等發展之研究:論屏東地區檳榔之資本累積性質與機制,台北:國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文,1992。 邱清華、洪錦墩、邱丕霞:台灣地區吸菸與嚼食檳榔的盛行率調查。中華牙誌 1997;16(1):28-36。 洪信嘉、陳建仁:口腔及咽癌之流行病學。韓良俊(主編):檳榔的健康危害。台北:健康世界雜誌社,2000;17-38。 胡幼慧:編者序。胡幼慧(主編):質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北:巨流圖書公司,1996a;1-4。 胡幼慧:多元方法:三角交叉檢視法。胡幼慧(主編):質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北:巨流圖書公司,1996b;271-285。 胡維恆、林秀霞、林式穀:勞工精神作用物質使用現況調查研究(Ⅱ):運輸葉勞工物質使用預防對策探討。台北:行政院勞工委員會勞工安全衛生研究所委託研究報告,1999。 孫清山、黃毅志:社會資源、文化資本與地位取得。東海學報 1994; 35: 127-50。 孫清山、黃毅志:補習教育、文化資本與教育取得。台灣社會學刊 1996; 19: 95-139。 孫智綺(譯):布赫迪厄社會學的第一課。台北:麥田,2002。(Bonnewitz P. 1997) 徐碧惠:台北市檳榔嚼食率、吸菸率及對檳榔危害健康意識及態度之調查。高雄:高雄醫學大學口腔衛生科學研究所碩士論文,2002。 高宣揚:布爾迪厄。台北:生智文化事業有限公司,2002。 張蕊仙:苗栗縣泰安鄉成年人嚼食檳榔、抽菸、喝酒與其肝功能相關性探討。高雄:高雄醫學大學口腔衛生科學研究所碩士論文,2002。 畢恆達:社會研究的研究者與倫理。嚴祥鸞(主編)危險與秘密:研究倫理。台北:三民書局,1998;31-91。 莊舜惠:台北地區檳榔攤空間特性之研究。台北:國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文,1999。 許功明(柯惠譯):排灣族古樓村的祭儀與文化。台北:稻鄉出版社,1998。 郭來春:台南縣居民檳榔、菸、酒盛行率及其對健康危害意識之調查。高雄:高雄醫學大學口腔衛生科學研究所碩士論文,2002。 郭彥彬:嚼檳榔與口腔癌癌基因、抑癌基因的突變和表現。賴美淑(主編)、韓良俊(召集人):論壇健康促進與疾病預防委員會文獻回顧研析計畫:「檳榔嚼塊與口腔癌」。台北:國家衛生研究院,2000。 陳信銘、韓良俊:檳榔問題的迷思與事實。韓良俊(主編):檳榔的健康危害。台北:健康世界雜誌社,2000;172-189。 陳美汀:南投縣居民嚼食檳榔、吸菸、飲酒盛行率及其健康危害意識調查。高雄:高雄醫學大學口腔衛生科學研究所碩士論文,2002。 陳富莉、李蘭:台灣地區成年人之吸菸與嚼檳榔行為的組合及其相關因子之探討。中華衛誌 1999;18(5):341-348。 黃淑珠:屏東縣居民使用檳榔、菸、酒盛行率及其對健康危害意識之調查。高雄:高雄醫學大學口腔衛生科學研究所碩士論文,2002。 楊奕馨:檳榔嚼塊與口腔癌流行病學研究。賴美淑(主編)、韓良俊(召集人):論壇健康促進與疾病預防委員會文獻回顧研析計畫:「檳榔嚼塊與口腔癌」。台北:國家衛生研究院,2000。 楊奕馨、陳鴻榮、曾筑瑄、謝天渝:台灣地區各縣市檳榔嚼食率調查報告。台灣口腔醫學衛生科學雜誌 2002;18:1-16。 楊雪華:高中生的同儕關係與吸菸行為:社會網絡觀點。台北:台灣大學衛生政策與管理研究所博士論文,2003。 楊瑪利:檳榔文化—文明與原始的矛盾。天下雜誌 1992; 128:26-36。 葉啟政:進出「結構——行動」的困境。台北:三民書局,2000。 葛梅貞、李蘭、蕭朱杏:傳播管道與健康行為之關係研究:以嚼食檳榔為例。中華衛誌 1999:18(5):349-362。 劉仲冬:民族誌研究法及實例。胡幼慧(主編):質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北:巨流圖書公司,1996;173-193。 劉美媛、周碧瑟:台灣地區在校青少年嚼檳榔的流行病學研究。中華衛誌 2000;19(1):42-49。 潘美玲:台灣的檳榔消費文化。張維安、朱燕華(編著):經濟與社會:兩岸三地社會文化分析。台北:生智文化事業有限公司,2001;221-231。 蔡素惠:高雄市十八歲以上成人檳榔、菸、酒盛行率及對健康危害之調查。高雄:高雄醫學大學口腔衛生科學研究所碩士論文,2002。 蔡慶同:當運匠聽到地下電台——論地下電台與社會運動之關係。台北:國立台灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文,1996。 蔡鵬飛:台灣地區嚼食檳榔風俗近況與牙醫界的對策。韓良俊(主編):檳榔的健康危害。台北:健康世界雜誌社,2000;46-52。 鄭景暉:檳榔嚼塊的化學致癌性質暨其防制:現況與未來。賴美淑(主編)、韓良俊(召集人):論壇健康促進與疾病預防委員會文獻回顧研析計畫:「檳榔嚼塊與口腔癌」。台北:國家衛生研究院,2000。 賴美淑:賴序。賴美淑(主編)、韓良俊(召集人):論壇健康促進與疾病預防委員會文獻回顧研析計畫:「檳榔嚼塊與口腔癌」。台北:國家衛生研究院,2000;Ⅳ。 韓良俊:自序。韓良俊(主編):檳榔的健康危害。台北:健康世界雜誌社,2000a;8-12。 韓良俊:前言:我為什麼催生「檳榔學」。韓良俊(主編):檳榔的健康危害。台北:健康世界雜誌社,2000b;13-16。 韓良俊(主編):口腔檳榔癌,第七版。台北:行政院衛生署指導,中華民國防癌協會印製,2000。 嚴祥鸞:參與觀察法。胡幼慧(主編):質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北:巨流圖書公司,1996;195-223。 英文部分 Abel T. Measuring health lifestyles in a comparative analysis: theoretical issues and empirical finding. Social Science and Medicine 1991; 32: 899-908. Agar M. Toward a qualitative epidemiology. Qualitative Health Research 2003; 13(7): 974-86. Airhihenbuwa CO. Health and Culture: Beyond the Western Paradigm. London: Sage Publication, 1995. Atkinson P, Coffey A, Delamont S, Lofland J, Lofland L. Editorial Introduction. In: Atkinson P, Coffey A, Delamont S, Lofland J, Lofland L eds. Handbook of Ethnography. London: Sage, 2001; 1-7. Basu S. AI DS, empire, and public health behaviorism. International Journal of Health Services 2004; 34(1):156-167. Baum F. Researching public health: Behind the qualitative-quantitative methodological debate. Social Science and Medicine 1995; 40(4):459-468. Bauman Z. Thinking Sociologically London: Blackwell, 1990. Baer HA, Singer M, Susser I. Illicit Drugs: self-medicating, the hidden injuries of oppression. In Baer HA, Singer M, Susser I eds. Medical Anthropology and the World System: A Critical Perspective. London: Bergin & Garvey, 1997; 125-58. Blaxter M. Health & Lifestyles. London: Routledge, 1990. Blaxter, M. Class, Time and Biography. In Williams SJ, Gabe J, Calnan M eds. Health, Medicine and Society: Key Theories, Future Agendas. London: Routledge, 2000; 27-50. Bocock R. Consumption. London: Routledge, 1993. Bourdieu P. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1984. Bourdieu P. Social Space and Symbolic Power. In Other World: Essays Toward a Reflexive Sociology. Translated by Matthew Adamson. California: Stanford University Press, 1990; 123-139. Bourdieu P, Wacquant Loic JD. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: Blackwell, 1992. Bourgois P, Bruneau J. Needle exchange, HIV infection, and the politics of science: confronting Canada’s cocaine injection epidemic with participant observation. Medical Anthropology 2000; 18:325-350. Brown P. Popular epidemiology and toxic waste contamination. Journal of Health and Behaviour 1992; 33: 267-281. Calhoun C. Critical Social Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995. Calnan M, Rutter DR. Preventive health practices and their relationship with socio-demographic characteristics. Health Education Research 1986; 1(4):247-253. Calnan M, Ruyer D. Do health beliefs predict health behaviour? Social Science and Medicine 1986; 22:673-678. Calnan M. Control over health and patterns of health-related behaviour. Social Science and Medicine 1989; 29(20):131-136. Calnan M. The Health Belief Model and participation in programmes for the early detection of breast cancer: a comparative analysis. Social Science and Medicine 1984; 19:823-830. Chang KM. Betel nut chewing and mouth cancer in Taiwan. First report: Survey of disposition of mouth cancer in Taiwan. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association 1964; 63(9):437-448. Chang KM. Betel nut chewing and mouth cancer in Taiwan. Second report: Observation of the oral mucosa in the betel nut chewer. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association 1966; 65(2):79-86. Chen JW, Shaw JH. A study on betel quid chewing behavior among Kaohsiung residents aged 15 years and above. Journal Oral Pathology & Medicine 1996; 25:140-143. Chen KT, Chen CJ, Anne F-C, Narayan KMV. Tobacco, betel quid, alcohol, and illicit drug use among 13- to 35-year olds in I-Lan, rural Taiwan: Prevalence and risk factors. American Journal of Public Health 2001; 91:1130-1134. Cockerham WC, Abel T, Luschen G. Max Weber, formal rationality, and health lifestyle. The Sociological Quarterly 1993; 34: 413-435. Cockerham WC, Rutten A, Abel T. Conceptualizing contemporary health lifestyles: moving beyond Weber. The Sociological Quarterly 1997; 38(2):321-342. Cockerham WC. The sociology of health behavior and health lifestyles. In: Bird C, Conrad, P, Fremont AM eds. Handbook of Medical Sociology. 5th ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 2000; 159-172. Conrad P. Worksite health promotion: the social context. Social Science and Medicine 1988a; 26: 485-489. Conrad P. Health and fitness at work: a participant’s perception. Social Science and Medicine 1988b; 26: 545-550. Conrad P. Qualitative research on chronic illness: a commentary on method and conceptual development. Social Science and Medicine 1990; 30:1257-1263. Courtwright DT. Forces of Habit: Drugs and the Making of the Modern World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001. Crawford R. A cultural account of health: control release and the social body. In: Mckinley J. ed Issues in the Political Economy of Health Care. New York: Tavistock, 1984; 60-103. Davies CA. Reflexive Ethnography: A Gide to Researching Selves and Others. London:Routledge, 1999. Davison C, Davey Smith G, Frankel S. Lay epidemiology and the prevention paradox: the implications of coronary candidacy for health education. Sociology of Health & Illness 1991;13: 1-20. Daykin N, Naidoo J. Feminist critiques of health promotion. In: Bunton R, Nettleton S, Burrows R eds. The Sociology of Health Promotion: Critical Analysis of Consumption, Lifestyle and Risk. London: Routledge, 1995; 59-69. Daykin N. Yong women and smoking: Towards a sociological account. Health Promotion International 1993; 8(2):95-102. Douglas M, Isherwood B. The World of Goods: Toward An Anthropology of Consumption. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1979. Duncan C, Jones K, Moon G. Health-related behaviour in context: a multilevel modeling approach. Social Science and Medicine 1996; 42:817-830. Eakin J, Robertson A, Poland B, Coburn D, Edwards R. Toward a critical social science perspective on health promotion research. Health Promotion International 1996; 11(2): 157-165. Emmons KM. Health behaviors in a social context. In: Berkman L, Kawachi I eds. Social Epidemiology. Oxford University Press, 2000;242-266. Fetterman DV. Ethnography: Step by Step. London: Sage, 1989. Forbes A, Wainwright SP. On the methodological, theoretical and philosophical context of health inequalities research: a critque. Social Science and Medicine 2001; 53:801-816. Frohlich KL, Corin E, Potvin, L. A theoretical proposal for the relationship between context and disease. Sociology of Health & Illness 2001; 23: 776-797. Frohlich KL, Potvin L, Chabot P, Corin E. A theoretical and empirical analysis of context: neighbourhoods, smoking and youth. Social Science and Medicine 2002; 54:1401-1417. Gabe J, Thorogood N. Prescribed drug use and the management of everyday life: the experience of black and white working-class women, Sociological Review 1986: 738-762. Giddens A. The Constitution of Society: Outline of A Theory of Structuration. London: Polity Publication, 1984. Graham H. Gender and class as dimensions of smoking behaviour in Britain: insights from a survey of mothers. Social Science and Medicine 1994; 38:691-698. House JS. Understanding social factors and inequalities in health: 20th century progress and 21st century prospects. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 2001; 43(June):125-142. Hugh-Jones S. coca, beer, cigars and yage: meals and anti-meals in an Amerindian community. In: Goodman J, Lovejoy PE, Sherratt A eds. Consuming Habits: Drug in History and Anthropology. London: Routledge, 1995;47-66. Hunt G, Barker JC. Social-cultural anthropology and alcohol and drug research: towards a unified theory. Social Science and Medicine 2001; 53:165-188. Hunt S, Macleod M. Health and behaviour change. Community Medicine 1988; 9:68-76. Jorgensen DL. Participant Observation. London: Sage, 1989. Kaufert PA, O’Neil J. Analysis of dialogue on risks in childbirth: clinicians, epidemiologists, and Inuit women. In: Lindenbaum S, Lock M eds. Knowledge, Power, and Practice: The Anthropology of Medicine and Everyday Life. Berkeley and Los Angeles, California:University of California Press, 1993; 32-54. Ko YC, Chiang TA, Chang SJ, Hsieh SF. Prevalence of betel quid chewing habit in Taiwan and related sociodemographic factors. Journal Oral Pathology & Medicine 1992; 21:261-264. Ko YC, Huang YL, Lee CH, Chen MJ, Lin LM, Tsai CC. Betal quid chewing, cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption related to oral cancer in Taiwan. Journal Oral Pathology & Medicine 1995; 24:450-453. Laurier E, McKie L, Goodwin N. Daily and lifecourse context of smoking. Sociology of Health & Illness 2000; 22(3): 289-309. Lawlor DA, Frankel S, Shaw M, Ebrahim S, Davey Smith G.. Smoking and ill health: dose lay epidemiology explain the failure of smoking cessation programs among deprived population? American Journal of Public Health 2003; 93:266-270. Lee RG, Garvin T. Moving from information transfer to information exchange in health and health care. Social Science and Medicine 2003;56: 449-464. Lindbladh E, Lyttkens CH. Hanson BS. Ostergren, P-O. Equity is out of fashion? an essay on autonomy and health policy in the individualized society. Social Science and Medicine 1998; 46(8): 1017-1025. Lindbladh E, Lyttkens CH. Habit versus choice: the process of decision-making in health-related behaviour. Social Science and Medicine 2002; 55:451-465. Lindenbaum S, Lock M. Preface. In: Lindenbaum S, Lock M eds. Knowledge, Power, and Practice: The Anthropology of Medicine and Everyday Life. Berkeley and Los Angeles, California:University of California Press, 1993;Ⅸ—ⅩⅤ. Lupton D. The Imperative of Health: Public Health and the Regulated Body. London: Sage Publication, 1995. Macintyre S, Ellaway A, Cummins S. Place effects of health: how can we conceptualise, operationalise and measure them? Social Science and Medicine 2002;55:125-139. McKeganey N, Barnard M. AIDS Drugs and Sexual Risk: Lives in the Balance. Open University, 1992. Mercado-Martinez FJ, Ramos-Herrera IM. Diabeted: The layperson’s theories of causality. Qualitative Health Research 2002; 12: 792-806. Milburn, K.The importance of lay theorizing for health promotion research and practice. Health Promotion International 1996; 11(1): 41-46. Mirowsky J, Ross CE, Reynolds, J. Links between social status and health status. In: Bird C, Conrad, P, Fremont AM eds. Handbook of Medical Sociology. 5th ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 2000; 47-67. Murphy E, Dingwall R. The ethics of ethnography. In: Atkinson P, Coffey A, Delamont S, Lofland J, Lofland L eds. Handbook of Ethnography. London: Sage, 2001; 339-351. Nettleton S, Bunton R. Sociological critiques of health promotion. In: Bunton R, Nettleton S, Burrows R eds. The Sociology of Health Promotion: Critical Analysis of Consumption, Lifestyle and Risk. London: Routledge, 1995;41-58. Pavis S, Cunningham-Burley S, Amos A. Health related behavioural change in context: young people in Transition. Social Science and Medicine 1998; 47:1407-1418. Petersen A, Lupton D. The New Public Health: Health and Self in the Age of Risk. London: Sage, 1996. Price N, Hawkins K. Researching sexual and reproductive behavior: a peer ethnographic approach. Social Science and Medicine 2002; 55:1325-1336. Popay J, Williams G. Public health research and lay knowledge. Social Science and Medicine 1996; 42: 759-768. Ritzer G.. Contemporary Sociological theory and Its Classical Roots: The Basics. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2003. Ross CE, Wu CL. The links between education and health. American Sociological Review 1995; 60(5):719-745. Rubin HJ, Rubin IS. Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. London: Sage, 1995. Sherratt A. Introduction: peculiar substances. In: Goodman J, Lovejoy PE, Sherratt A eds. Consuming Habits: Drug in History and Anthropology. London: Routledge, 1995;1-10. Shim KJ. Understanding the routinised inclusion of race, socioeconomic status and sex in epidemiology: the utility of concepts from technoscience studies. Sociology of Health & Illness 2002; 24(2):129-150. Singer M. Drug-use patterns: an ever-whirling wheel of change. Medical Anthropology 2000; 18:299-303. Slater D. Consumer Culture and Modernity. London: Routledge, 1997. Smith P. Cultural Theory: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001; 82-85. Smith V. Ethnographies of work and the work of ethnographers. In: Atkinson P, Coffey A, Delamont S, Lofland J, Lofland L eds. Handbook of Ethnography. London: Sage, 2001; 220-233. Sorensen G, Barbeau E, Hunt MK, Emmons K. Reducing social disparities in tobacco use: a social-contextual model for reducing tobacco use among blue-collar workers. American Journal of Public Health 2004;94:230-239. Strunin L. Assessing alcohol consumption: developments from qualitative research methods. Social Science and Medicine 2001; 53:215-226. Tannahill A. Epidemiology and health promotion. In: Bunton R, Macdonald G eds. Health Promotion: Disciplines and Diversity. London: Routledge, 1992; 86-107. Taylor S. Researching the social: an introduction to ethnographic research. In Taylor S. ed Ethnographic research: A Reader. London:Sage, 2002; 1-12. Thomas J. Doing Critical Ethnography. London:Sage, 1993. Weare, K. The contribution of education to health promotion. In: Bunton R, Macdonald G eds. Health Promotion: Disciplines, Diversity and Development. London: Routledge, 2002; 102-125. Williams G, Popay J. Lay knowledge and the privilege of experience. In: Gabe J, Kelleher D, Williams G eds. Challenging Medicine. London: Routledge, 1994; 118-39. Williams SJ. Theorising class, health and lifestyles: can Bourdieu help us? Sociology of Health & Illness 1995; 17(5):577-604. Wing S. Whose Epidemiology, whose health? International Journal of Health Services. 1998; 28(2):241-252. Xu KT. Compensating behaviors , regret, and heterogeneity in the dynamics of smoking behavior. Social Science and Medicine 2002; 54: 133-146. Yang MS, Su IH, Wen JK, Ko YC. Prevalence and related risk factors of betel quid chewing by adolescent students in southern Taiwan. Journal Oral Pathology & Medicine 1996; 25: 69-71. Yang YH, Lee HY, Tung S, Shieh TY. Epidemiological survey of oral submucous fibrosis and Leukoplakia in aborigines of Taiwan. Journal Oral Pathology & Medicine 2001; 30:213-219. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/39272 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 嚼食檳榔與口腔癌的關係,近年來已成為公共衛生領域內重要的議題。由於台灣有關檳榔的研究中,針對使用者或是圈內人觀點的研究較少,也缺乏探討檳榔與嚼食者日常生活脈絡的關係,為了更真實貼近一般嚼食檳榔的勞動者,本研究以嚼檳榔計程車司機為研究對象,透過深入訪談、非正式訪問、以及較長時間的參與觀察,強調社會結構與個人健康行為互動的關係,來探討他們的嚼檳榔行為。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Recently, the relationship of areca quid chewing and oral cancer has become an important issue in public health. Previous studies in Taiwan, however, had hardly ever explored areca quid chewers’ risk perspectives, and how the chewing behavior was embedded in the social context of their everyday lives. This research collected data from areca quid chewing taxi drivers and focused on areca quid chewers’ daily lives. With in-depth interview, observation and informal interview, this study examines the relationship between social structure and agents in which areca quid chewing habits were embedded.
Accompanied by an ex-taxi driver, I visited taxi drivers’ rest areas and waiting lines in Taipei. There were four major parts in the study. In Part one, I described the relationship between social position, job “choice” and areca quid chewing of 44 areca quid chewing taxi drivers who were in-depth interviewed. In Part two, I explored these areca quid chewers’ daily work context in which the consumption of areca quid was embedded. I learned from the participants that the consumption of areca quid was a “border” that differentiates between the work and non—work context, and it was also a vehicle for social interaction and a symbol of group identity. In Part three, I examined areca quid chewing taxi drivers’ perspectives of areca quid related health risk information. These taxi drivers integrated areca quid risk information with their personal health knowledge and daily experiences, reinterpreted areca quid risk information, and took action. In part four, I explored the relationship of their health promoting behaviors and risk behaviors. Taxi drivers were likely to use more than one substance to cope with their stressful lifestyle, and usually did not focus on a single behavioral effect on their overall health. Instead, they tended to assess their health and the risks they encountered from a holistic perspective. In sum, this study concentrates on social structure that constrains individual health-related behavior from the chewers’ point of view. This research aims to provide public health professionals with a new perspective to investigate health-related behavior. I suggest that areca quid chewing cannot be treated simply as an isolated “behavior”. Rather, it operates within the world of structured contexts determined by individual chewers’ social position. The finding provides a sociological perspective in public health research, and holds implications for health promotion polices and theories. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T17:25:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-94-D86821003-1.pdf: 893277 bytes, checksum: c9ef2f8d96e0bb52f7b2c2d5c66ad25f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒 論
第一節 研究背景…………………………………………………………… 1 第二節 研究目的…………………………………………………………… 3 第三節 研究重要性………………………………………………………… 4 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 嚼食檳榔議題的發展……………………………………………… 6 第二節 公共衛生領域的檳榔研究取向與限制…………………………… 10 第三節 日常生活脈絡對健康行為的影響………………………………… 13 第四節 常民對健康行為的觀點…………………………………………… 16 第五節 消費與生活方式的社會意涵……………………………………… 19 第三章 研究方法 第一節 方法論的議題……………………………………………………… 23 第二節 資料來源與資料收集的方式……………………………………… 27 第三節 資料分析…………………………………………………………… 33 第四章 訪談對象的簡介 第一節 受訪對象之社會人口特質………………………………………… 34 第二節 為什麼進入計程車行業…………………………………………… 37 第三節 生命歷程與嚼檳榔………………………………………………… 47 第五章 日常生活不同脈絡下的檳榔使用 第一節 檳榔對計程車司機日常生活的作用……………………………… 59 第二節 工作形象與嚼檳榔形象…………………………………………… 68 第六章 「誰」的檳榔知識 第一節 常民的檳榔知識:檳榔對身體的「正面」影響………………… 75 第二節 常民如何看待「檳榔危害」訊息………………………………… 80 第七章 健康行為 VS. 不健康行為 第一節 物質使用行為的群聚……………………………………………… 93 第二節 計程車司機如何促進健康…………………………………………105 第八章 討論 第一節 社會結構與嚼檳榔行為的關係……………………………………116 第二節 使用檳榔的脈絡意義與區隔………………………………………119 第三節 常民的健康知識……………………………………………………122 第四節 什麼是健康生活方式………………………………………………127 第五節 研究的特點與限制…………………………………………………129 第九章 結論與建議 第一節 結論…………………………………………………………………131 第二節 建議…………………………………………………………………133 參考文獻 中文部分………………………………………………………………………136 英文部分………………………………………………………………………139 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 常民知識 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 習癖 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 嚼檳榔 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 計程車司機 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 社會脈絡 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | taxi driver | en |
| dc.subject | lay knowledge | en |
| dc.subject | social context | en |
| dc.subject | habitus | en |
| dc.subject | areca quid chewing | en |
| dc.title | 嚼食檳榔的脈絡分析:一個對台北地區計程車司機的田野研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Contextual Analysis of Areca Quid Chewing: A Field Study of Taxi Drivers in Taipei | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 93-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 張玨 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 江俊斌,陳秀熙,陳美霞 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 習癖,嚼檳榔,計程車司機,社會脈絡,常民知識, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | areca quid chewing,taxi driver,habitus,social context,lay knowledge, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 145 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2005-01-25 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 衛生政策與管理研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 健康政策與管理研究所 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-94-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 872.34 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
