Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 會計學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/39252
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor林嬋娟
dc.contributor.authorChun-Ho Chenen
dc.contributor.author陳俊合zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-13T17:24:53Z-
dc.date.available2005-01-31
dc.date.copyright2005-01-31
dc.date.issued2005
dc.date.submitted2005-01-26
dc.identifier.citation一、中文部分
天下雜誌,2002,「股東.員工.CEO的戰爭-美國分贓台灣分紅?」,第202期:46。
馬秀如,2003,「員工分紅配股既是股東的成本,也是公司的費用」,會計研究月刊,第214期,62-70。
商業周刊,2002,「把分紅列入費用,許多公司都沒賺錢」:66-68。
施振榮,2002,「員工分紅入股有其存在意義與價值」,經濟日報,8月1日。
曹興誠,2002,「談台灣IC工業之競爭力」,經濟日報,5月17日。
曹興誠,2003,「為員工分紅入股說幾句話」,工商時報,1月6日。
許崇源、張仲岳、葉疏,2003,「我們認為員工分紅應列為費用」,中華會計教育學會:1-38。
張仲岳,1999,「員工紅利及董監酬勞對股價影響之研究」,一九九九當代會計理論與實務研討會論文集:194-211。
張培真,2003,「員工分紅入股與公司特質之關係及其對公司績效之影響」,國立台灣大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
陳安斌、王信文,2002,「知識經濟之競爭力泉源-獨步全球的台式員工分紅入股制度」,產業論壇,第3卷2期:1-19。
陳隆麒、翁霓,1992,「員工持股計畫與公司經營績效關係之研究」,管理評論 11:81-102。
陳裕仁,2003,「員工紅利與董監酬勞對企業經營績效及股票報酬影響之研究」,國立台北大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
游淑禎,2003,「員工分紅配股與公司經營績效」,國立雲林科技大學管理研究所未出版博士論文。
鍾惠珍,2000,「員工紅利分配法律及會計問題座談會記實」,會計研究月刊,第170期:56-67。
鍾惠珍,2002 a,「員工分紅制度探討」,會計研究月刊,第202期:44-58。
鍾惠珍,2002 b,「員工分紅費用化?爭論不休!」,會計研究月刊,第205期:91-97。
歐進士,1998,「我國企業研究發展與經營績效之實證研究」,中山管理評論,第六卷第二期:357-386。
蔡志瑋,2003,「員工分紅與公司績效及投資人報酬之關聯性研究—以台灣上市資訊電子業為例」,國立政治大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
顏明宏,2003,「員工分紅入股對公司股價與績效的影響」,國立台灣大學財務金融學研究所未出版碩士論文。
二、英文部分
Aboody, D. 1996. Market Valuation of Employee Stock Options. Journal of Accounting and Economics 22(1-3): 357-391.
Amir, E. and B. Lev. 1996. Value-relevance of Nonfinancial Information: The Wireless Communications Industry. Journal of Accounting and Economics 22: 3-30.
Banz, R.W. 1981. The Relationship between Return and Market Value of Common Stock. Journal of Finance Economics(March): 3-18.
Bell, T. B., W. R. Landsman, B. L. Miller and S. Yeh. 2002. The Valuation Implications of Employee Stock-Option Accounting for Computer Software Firms. Accounting Review 77: 971-996.
Chen, C.Y. 2003. Investment Opportunities and the Relationship between Equity Value and Employee Bonus. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 30(September): 941-974
Core, John E., Wayne R. Guay and S.P. Kothari. 2002. The Economic Dilution of Employee Stock Options: Diluted EPS for Valuation and Financial Reporting. Accounting Review (July): 627-652.
Core, John E., Robert W. Holthausen and David F. Larcker. 1999. Corporate Governance, Chief Executive Officer Compensation, and Firm Performance. Journal of Financial Economics 51: 371-406.
Dean, J. and T. Uimonen. 2002. Taiwan Bonuses Trigger Concerns-Huge Stock Awards Prompt Closer Scrutiny of Company Accounting. The Asian Wall Street Journal(July 18).
Deng, Z., B. Lev and F. Narin. 1999. Science and Technology as Predictors of Stock Performance. Financial Analysts Journal(May/June): 20-32.
Elayan, Fayez A., Jammy S.C. Lau, Thomas O. Meyer. 2001. Executive Incentive Compensation Schemes and Their Impact on Corporate Performance:Evidence from New Zealand Since Legal Disclosure Requirements became Effective. Working paper, Masey University.
Fama, E.F. and K. R. French. 1992. The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns. Journal of Finance 47: 427-465.
Gaver, J. and K. Gaver. 1993. Additional Evidence on the Association between the Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing, Dividend, and Compensation Policies. Journal of Accounting and Economics 16: 125-160.
Gaver, J., K. Gaver and J. R. Austin. 1995. Additional Evidence on Bonus Plans and Income Management. Journal of Accounting and Economics 19: 3-28.
Gibbons, R. and K. Murphy. 1990. Relative Performance Evaluation for Chief Executive Compensation. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 43: 30-51.
Gibbons, R. and K. Murphy. 1992. Optimal Incentive Contracts in the Presence of Career Concerns: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Political Economics, Vol. 100, No. 3: 468-505.
Healy, P. M. 1985. The Effect of Bonus Schemes on Accounting Decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7: 85-107.
Holmstorm, B. 1979. Moral Hazard and Observability. Bell Journal of Economics 10: 74-91.
Holmstorm, B. and P. Milgrom. 1991. Multitask Principal-Agent Analysis: Incentives Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design. Journal of Law Economica and Organization 7: 24-52.
Holthausen, R., D. Larcker and R. G. Sloan. Annual Bonus Schemes and the Manipulation of Earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 19: 29-74.
Iqbal, Z. and S. A. Hamid. 2000. Stock Price and Operating Performance of ESOP Firms: A Time-Series Analysis. Quarterly Journal of Business & Economics (Summer): 25-47.
Ittner, C., D. Larcker and M. Rajan. 1997. The Choice of Performance Measures in Annual Bonus Contracts. Accounting Review 72: 231-255.
Jensen, M.C. and W.H. Meckling.1976. Theory of the Firm: Management Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3:305-360.
Kerr, J. and R. A. Bettis. 1987. Boards of Directors, Top Management Compensation, and Shareholder Returns. Academy of Management Journal 30: 645-664.
Klein, K. 1987. Employee Stock Ownership and Employee Attitudes: A Test of Three Models. Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph 72: 319-332.
Lambert, R. 1983. Long Term Contracts and Moral Hazard. The Bell Journal of Economic(Autumn): 441-452.
Lambert, R. and D. Larcker. 1987. An analysis of the Use of Accounting and Market Measures of Performance in Executive Compensation Contracts. Journal of Accounting Research 25: 129-149.
Lambert, R., D. Larcker and K. Weight. 1993. The Structure of Organizational Incentives. Administrative Science Quarterly 38: 438-461.
Lambert, R. 1990. The Use of Accounting and Security Price Measures of Performance in Managerial Compensation Contracts: A Discussion. Journal of Accounting and Economics 43: 101-124.
Lev, B. and T. Sougiannis.1996. The Capitalization, Amortization, and Value-relevance of R&D. Journal of Accounting and Economics 21: 107-138.
Long, R. J. 1978. The Effects of Employee Ownership on Organizational Identification, Employee Job Attitudes, and Organizational Performance. Human Relations 31: 29-48.
Mehran, H. 1995. Executive Compensation Structure, Ownership, and Firm Performance. Journal of Financial Economics 38: 163-184.
Murphy, K.J. 1985. Corporate Performance and Management Remuneration: An Empirical Analysis .Journal of Accounting and Economics 7: 11-42.
Park, S. and M. H. Song. 1995. Employee Stock Ownership Plans, Firm Performance, and Monitoring by Outside Blockholder. Financial Management(Winter): 52-64.
Sloan, R. G. 1993. Accounting Earnings and Top Executive Compensation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 16: 55-100.
Smith, C. W. and R. L. Watts. 1992. The Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing, Dividend, and Compensation Policy. Journal of Financial Economics 32: 263-292.
Sougiannis, T. 1994. The Accounting Based Valuation of Corporate R&D. Accounting Review(January): 44-68.
Watts, R., and J. Zimmerman. 1986. Positive Accounting Theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Wilson, N., J. R. Cable and M. J. Peel. 1990. Quit Rates and the Impact of Participation, Profit-Sharing and Unionization: Empirical Evidence from UK Engineering Firms. British Journal of Industrial Relations 28: 197-213.
Yeo, Gillian H.H., Sheng-Syan Chen, Kim Wai Ho and Cheng-Few Lee. 1999. The Effect of Executive Share Option Plans on Shareholder Wealth and Firm Performance: The Singapore Evidence. Financial Review 34: 1-20.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/39252-
dc.description.abstract員工分紅是國內企業常見的獎酬制度,尤其在高科技產業更是主要的財務激勵制度。國內科技業普遍利用員工分紅制度來激勵員工,乃希望發放大額員工紅利能吸引與留任優秀人才,且可激勵員工士氣,以期能提升公司未來績效。2002年外國投資機構對國內員工分紅制度提出嚴重質疑,因為國內員工紅利並沒有於損益表認列薪酬費用,將造成盈餘虛增與過度發放員工紅利,並損及股東權益。從此之後,員工紅利制度便成為一個熱門議題,本文針對我國員工紅利與後續公司績效之關聯性,提供較為完整之實證分析。
本研究發現員工分紅比率與後續公司績效具有微弱顯著的正關聯性,即產生正向的激勵效果;但調整員工紅利費用化後的後續經營績效,則出現負的關聯性,即員工分紅的稀釋效果大於激勵效果,可能肇因於不佳的公司治理,而產生過度發放員工分紅或過度利潤分享所致。此外,本研究發現,當股票紅利占員工紅利總額比例較高,其後續績效並未較佳。
本研究建議,企業管理當局不應過度發放員工分紅,以免損及股東權益,並可有效提升公司治理。此外,亦可考慮搭配其他有效獎酬制度來激勵員工。本文亦建議,主管機關或會計準則制定機構應盡快修改員工分紅會計處理,將員工紅利依公平價值允以費用化,除可提升財務報表的可靠性與透明度外,並有助於企業訂定合理的員工分紅制度,以增進有效的公司治理。本研究結果可提供政府主管機關、企業管理當局與投資人相關決策參考。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe employee stock bonus plan is a commonly adopted incentive compensation scheme in Taiwan, especially in high-tech companies. The main purposes of granting huge employee bonuses to employees are to attract and retain excellent employees, to motivate them and to improve their working attitude. Furthermore, granting firms expect this incentive scheme will improve their future firm performance.
Under the current accounting practice in Taiwan, the employee bonuses are not recognized as compensation cost, which results in an overstatement of the reported earnings and induces excess distribution of employee bonuses. Since 2002, when foreign investors raised concerns about the adverse impact of this accounting treatment for the employee bonuses, it has become a hot topic in the Taiwanese stock market. The main purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between employee bonuses and subsequent firm performance.
This study finds that the employee bonuses have a weakly significant and positive incentive effect on subsequent firm performance. However, after adjusting subsequent operating performance by considering the expenses of employee bonuses, the results no longer support the hypothesis that higher bonus ratio will create better subsequent firm performance. This means that the dilution effect of the employee bonuses is greater than its incentive effect and that this is caused by an excess distribution of employee bonuses (or excess profit sharing). In addition, the results do not support the hypothesis that the higher the percentage of the stock bonus the better the subsequent firm performance.
The results suggest that managers should not distribute excess employee bonuses in order to improve corporate governance, but may adopt other effective compensation plans to motivate their employees. In addition, this paper suggests that regulatory agencies or accounting standards setting bodies have to amend the current accounting treatment to recognize the expenses of the employee bonuses. This would improve the reliability and transparency of financial reporting, and also help to generate a reasonable employee bonus plan.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T17:24:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-94-D87722002-1.pdf: 503238 bytes, checksum: f7a3ec689bd34076d62f37eb4764d1b1 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2005
en
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論…………………………………………………… 1
第二章 文獻回顧……………………………………………… 7
第一節 最適激勵契約…………………………………………… 7
第二節 績效衡量指標…………………………………………… 9
第三節 激勵薪酬與公司績效………………………………… 10
第三章 研究方法……………………………………………… 13
第一節 研究假說………………………………………………… 13
第二節 實證模型與變數定義…………………………………… 15
第四章 資料來源與敘述性統計……………………………… 20
第一節 資料來源………………………………………………… 20
第二節 樣本選擇………………………………………………… 21
第三節 敘述性統計分析………………………………………… 22
第五章 實證結果與分析……………………………………… 42
第一節 員工紅利與後續資產報酬率…………………………… 42
第二節 員工紅利與後續調整後資產報酬率…………………… 47
第三節 員工紅利與後續每股盈餘成長率……………………… 50
第四節 員工紅利與後續設算每股盈餘成長率………………… 54
第五節 員工紅利與後續股票報酬率…………………………… 58
第六節 敏感性分析……………………………………………… 62
第六章 結論與建議…………………………………………… 75
參考文獻………………………………………………………… 78
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject獎酬制度zh_TW
dc.subject激勵薪酬計畫zh_TW
dc.subject公司績效zh_TW
dc.subject公司治理zh_TW
dc.subject員工紅利zh_TW
dc.subjectEmployee bonusesen
dc.subjectFirm performanceen
dc.subjectIncentive compensation schemeen
dc.subjectCompensation planen
dc.subjectCorporate governanceen
dc.title員工紅利與後續公司績效之關聯性zh_TW
dc.titleThe Association between Employee Bonuses and Subsequent Firm Performanceen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear93-1
dc.description.degree博士
dc.contributor.coadvisor蔡彥卿
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee葉疏,許崇源,李存修,張仲岳
dc.subject.keyword激勵薪酬計畫,公司績效,公司治理,員工紅利,獎酬制度,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordEmployee bonuses,Compensation plan,Incentive compensation scheme,Firm performance,Corporate governance,en
dc.relation.page84
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2005-01-26
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept會計學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:會計學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-94-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
491.44 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved