請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/39044完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 羅鈞令(Jin-Ling Lo) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chung-Yi Chiu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 邱崇懿 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T16:59:02Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2005-02-25 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2005-02-25 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2005-02-21 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
台北市政府托育資訊服務網。托兒查詢。（民93）。http://kids.taipei.gov.tw/search.htm 伊慶春、彭淑華、孫世雄、江玉龍、魏季李、唐啟明、謝秀芬、曾華源、胡慧嫈、馮燕、王麗容、蘇希三、黃富源與余漢儀。（民國86）。家庭與兒童保護。台北：中華福利基金會。 行政院主計處第三局。行業標準分類。（民90）。http://www.dgbasey.gov.tw/census~n/two/FILE/APPENDIX/MENU.htm 沙依人。（民68）。兒童發展與兒童行為。台北：世紀。 周文欽，歐滄和，許擇基，盧欽銘，金樹人與范德鑫（民84）。心理與教育測驗，頁96-97。台北：心理。 邱皓政。（民國91）。量化研究與統計分析：SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。台北：五南。 姚開屏。（民85）。從心理計量的觀點看測量工具的發展。職能治療學會雜誌，14(1)，頁5-20。 姚開屏、余俊生與鄒國蘇。（民86）。CCDI常模的再思。美商亞培股份有限公司台灣分公司支助計畫。頁1-23。 胡崇元、謝明慧、陳三能、陳淑華與蕭文勝。（民86）。 學齡前兒童發展量表與貝萊嬰兒發展量表之相關。 台灣精神醫學，11，頁242-248。 胡崇元與柯慧貞。（民89）。我國CCDI之修改及常模之更新：台南市區常模之建立。行政院衛生署八十八年下半年及八十九年度科技研究發展計畫。頁1-65。 徐澄清、蘇喜、蕭淑貞、林家青、宋維村與張玨。（民國67年）。 CCDI之修訂及初步常模之建立。 中華民國小兒科醫學會雜誌，19(2)，頁142-156。 郭生玉。（民國78）。心理與教育測驗。台北：精華。 郭生玉。（民國80）。心理與教育研究法。台北：精華。 詹棟梁。（民83）。兒童人類學—兒童發展。台北：五南。 劉美淡。（民國84）。社區與兒童發展的關係。社會建設，7，頁36-41。 羅鈞令。（民國92）。兒童日常活動評估工具之發展。行政院衛生署九十二年度科技研究計畫結果報告。 Agresti, A. (1990). Categorical data analysis. New York: JOHN WILEY & SONS. Anastasi, A. (1976). Psychological teating. (4th ed). London: Collier Macmillan Publishers. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1992). Ecological systems theory. London: Kingsley. Clark, F. A., Parham, D., Carlson, M. E., Frank, G., Jackson, J., Pierce, D., Wolfe, R. J., & Zemke, R. (1991). Occupational science: Academic innovation in the service of occupational therapy’s furure. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 300-310. Coster, W. (1998). Occupation-centered assessment of children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 337-344. Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1987). From evolution to behavior. Evolutionary psychology as the missing link. In J. Dupre (Ed.), The latest on the best essaya on evolution and optimality (pp. 277-306). Cambridge, MA: MIT. Cronbach, L.J. & Meehl, P.E. (1995). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302. DeVellis, R.F. (1999). 量表的發展理論與應用 (Scale Development)（吳齊殷譯）。台北：弘智文化。 Diamond, K., & LeFurgy, W. (1992). Relationships between mother’s expections and the performance of their infants with developmental handicaps. Anerican Journal on Mental Retardation, 97, 11-20. Diamond, K. E., & Squires J. (1993). The role of parental report in the screening and assessment of young children. Journal of Early Intervention, 17(2), 107-115. Dunn, W., Brown, C., & McGuigan, A. (1994). The ecology of human performance: A framework for considering the effect of context. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48, 595-607. Greenberg, M.T., Calderon, R., & Kusche, C. (1984). Early intervention using simultaneous communication with deaf infants: the effect on communication development. Child Development, 55(2), 607-616. Gray, J. M. (2001). Discussion of the ICIDH-2 in relation to occupational therapy and occupational science. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 8, 19-30. Hasselkus, B. R. (2002). The meaning of Everyday Occupation. Thorofare: SLACK. Humphry, R. (2002). Young children’s occupations: explicating the dynamics of development process. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56(2), pp.171-179. Jarman, F. C. & Oberklaid F. (1992). The detection of developmental problems in children. Australian Family Physician, 21(8), 1079-1088. Kielhofner, G. (1997). Conceptual foundations of occupational therapy (2nd ed). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis. Law, M., Cooper, B., Strong, S., Stewart, D., Rigby, P., & Letts, L. (1996). The person-environment-occupation model: A transactive approach to occupational performance. Candian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 9-23. Law, M., Polatajko, H., Baptiste, S., & Townsend, E. (1997). Core concepts in occupational therapy. In E. Townsend (Ed.), Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective (pp. 29-56). Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. Law, M., Steinwender, S., & LeClair, L. (1998). Occupation, health and well-being. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(2), 81-91. Mailloux, Z., Knox, S. M., Burke, J. P., & Clark, F. (1985). Pediatric dysfunction. In G. Kielhofner (Ed.), A model of human occupation: Theroy and application (pp. 306-351). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins. Mathiowetz, V. (1993). Role of physical performance component evaluations in occupational therapy functional assessment. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 23, 323-328. Miller, S.A. (1988). Parents’ beliefs about children’s cognitive development. Child development, 59, 259-285. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: NcGraw-Hill. Oberklaid F. (2000). Is developmental assessment worthwhile? Australian Family Physician, 29(8), 731-734. Pierce, D. E. (2003). Occupation by design: building therapeutic power. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis. Polatajko, H. J. (1994). Dreams, dilemmas, and decisions for occupational therapy practice in a new millennium: A Canadian perspective. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48, 590-594. Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (2000). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Primeau, L. A. & Ferguson, J. M. (1999). Occupational frame of reference. In P. Kramer & J. Hinojosa (Eds.), Frames of reference for pediatric occupational therapy (2nd ed.) (pp. 469-516). New York: LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS. Prout, H., Harper, D., Snider, B., & Lindgren, S. (1978). Comparisons between mothers’ and teachers’ evaluations of developmental status. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 3, 57-61. Ramey, C. T., & Ramey, S. L. (1998). Early intervention and early experience. American Psychologist, 53(2), 109-120. Reilly, M. (1962). Occupational therapy can be one of the great ideas of 20th century medicine. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 16, 1-9. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking. New York: Oxford University Press. Saylor, C., Foster, K., & Huntington, L. (1991, November). Predictive and concurrent validity of two measures of development with paremature infants. Paper presented at the International Early Childhood Conference on Children with Special Needs. St. Louis, MO. Squires, J., Nickle, R., & Bricker, D. (1990). Use of parent-completed developmental questionnaires for child-find and screening. Infants and Young Children, 3, 46-57. Stephens, L. & Tauber, S. K. (2001). Early intervention. In J. Case-Smith (Eds.), Occupational therapy for children (pp. 708-729). St Louis: Mosby. Trombly, C. (1993). The issue is-Anticipating the Future: Assesssment of occupational function. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47, 253-257. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001. Wilcock, A. (1993). A theory of the human need for occupation. Occupational Science: Austeralia, 1, 17-23. Yerxa, E. J. (1994). Dreams, dilemmas, and decisions for occupational therapy practice in a new millennium: An American perspective. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48, 586-589. Yerxa, E. J., Clark, F., Frank, G., Jackson, J., Paraham, D., Pierce, D., Stein, C., & Zemke, R. (1989). An introduction to occupational science: A foundation for occupational therapy in the 21st century. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 6(4), 1-17. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/39044 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 嬰幼兒每天參與不同的日常職能活動(daily occupation)，其參與日常職能活動的表現是發展的過程也是結果。嬰幼兒日常職能活動量表(Pediatric Daily Occupation Inventory, PDOI)是以嬰幼兒的日常職能活動為評量內容的發展量表。本研究主要探討PDOI的同時效度，以學齡前兒童行為發展量表(Chinese Child Development Inventory, CCDI)作為效標。
本研究對象是台北市35家私立托嬰中心與托兒所中的6~71個月大的嬰幼兒401名。研究過程為請家長先填寫CCDI，後填寫PDOI，先後間隔7~20天。分析時用史比爾曼等級相關(Spearman rank order correlation coefficient, Rho; rs )來檢驗PDOI總分的原始分數與CCDI的7項發展能力與「一般發展」的原始分數的相關程度；以CCDI的「一般發展」的發展商數分出低分組與高分組，以t檢定來看PDOI的百分位數在此兩組間的平均數是否有差異；並採用兩種分組方式各建立一個預期表(expectancy table)，其一為將PDOI總分之原始分數與CCDI「一般發展」之原始分數，以各自的平均數間隔1個標準差為分組的標準，其二為四分位數，目的是獲得各組PDOI預測CCDI各組的機率；進一步驗證是否兩個預期表的一致值(concordant)大於不一致值(discordant)，且gamma值(γ)達顯著。 研究結果發現PDOI總分的原始分數與CCDI的7個發展能力與「一般發展」的發展商數達到顯著高度相關( rs = .737~ .908, p < .01)，顯示PDOI具有很高的同時效度。依據CCDI的「一般發展」之發展商數分出低分組與高分組時，低分組與高分組嬰幼兒在PDOI的百分位數達顯著差異( t = 7.837, p < .001)，表示PDOI能有效得區分發展程度高與低的嬰幼兒。兩個預期表皆顯示：PDOI總分之原始分數與CCDI「一般發展」之原始分數的平均數間隔1個標準差的分組γ值高達 .975 ( p < .001)與以四分位數的分組γ值也高達 .921 ( p < .001)，PDOI與CCDI之間其依相同分組標準的組別其分佈趨勢顯著一致。 從參與日常職能活動的角度評估嬰幼兒的發展，能直接的評估嬰幼兒在生活中的整體發展與需求，瞭解嬰幼兒自我組織整合不同發展能力的適應情形。PDOI將嬰幼兒的發展直接與日常生活結合，反應了嬰幼兒實際參與日常職能活動的情形，使得嬰幼兒發展的評估更具有生活的意義與價值。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Infants and toddlers participate different daily occupations everyday, and their occupational performance is the process and outcome of development. The content of the Pediatric Daily Occupation Inventory (PDOI) is infants’ and toddlers’ daily occupations. This research studied the concurrent validity of PDOI. The criterion was the Chinese Child Development Inventory (CCDI).
401 subjects were 6 ~ 71 month infants and toddlers from 35 private infant-care centers and nurseries in Taipei. The process was that parents filled in CCDI then PDOI during 1~3 weeks. Relationships between the PDOI total raw score with 7 developmental ability raw scores of CCDI and general developmental raw scores were analyzed by Spearman rank order correlation coefficient ( Rho; rs). Independent two samples t test was used to compare the difference of the PDOI percentile between low and high CCDI general development score groups. There were two ways to establich expectancy tables, grouping PDOI total raw scores and general developmental raw scores by grouping units of means with interval one unit standard deviation and quartiles. Expectancy tables showed probilities that each group of PDOI could predict each group of CCDI, and then verified whether each concordant was bigger than discordant, and tested for gamma value (γ). The result revealed that the concurrent validity of PDOI was very high. The PDOI total raw score with 7 developmental ability raw scores of CCDI and general developmental raw scores were correlated significantly (rs = .737~ .908, p < .01). There was significant difference in the PDOI between low and high general development score groups ( t = 7.837, p < .001). This revealed that PDOI could effectively distinguish low and high developmental level infants and toddlers. The expectancy table of mean with interval of a standard deviation was significantly concordant (γ= .975 , p < .001). The expectancy table of interval of a quartiles was significantly concordant with (γ= .921 , p < .001). To evaluate the development through the participation of daily occupations was directly to evaluate infants’ and toddlers’ whole development and need, as well as understood the adaptive situation of their self-organized abilities. PDOI connected infants’ and toddlers’ development and daily living directly, and expressed the true situation of occupation participation. In PDOI, there were more living meanings and values. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T16:59:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-94-R91429010-1.pdf: 517573 bytes, checksum: 338e7a431c60f38d510e666ca38c104b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
中文摘要 Ⅰ 英文摘要 Ⅲ 內文目錄 Ⅴ 表目錄 Ⅷ 第一章 研究動機與研究目的 1 第二章 文獻回顧 4 第一節 日常職能活動對嬰幼兒發展的重要性 4 一、日常職能活動的意義與價值 4 二、嬰幼兒參與日常職能活動對發展的重要性 5 第二節 嬰幼兒日常職能活動對評估嬰幼兒發展的重要性 7 一、以嬰幼兒參與日常職能活動來評估發展的重要性 7 二、一般常用的標準化發展評估工具的限制 10 第三節 良好測驗的特徵與同時效度 13 一、良好測驗的特徵 13 二、同時效度 15 第三章 研究方法與設計 18 第一節 研究對象 18 第二節 研究工具 18 一、嬰幼兒日常職能活動量表 19 二、學齡前兒童行為發展量表 21 第三節 研究過程 24 第四節 資料分析 26 一、人口學背景與生活環境 27 二、嬰幼兒日常職能活動量表的同時效度 27 第五節 倫理考量 29 第四章 研究結果 30 第一節 人口學背景與生活環境 31 第二節 嬰幼兒日常職能活動量表的同時效度 32 第五章 研究討論 34 第六章 結論與建議 37 第一節 研究結論 37 第二節 研究限制與建議 37 參考文獻 39 表 45 附錄一、嬰幼兒身心發展評量填寫同意書 70 附錄二、嬰幼兒基本資料表 71 附錄三、嬰幼兒日常職能活動量表部分內容 72 附錄四、嬰幼兒日常職能活動量表填寫說明 74 附錄五、學齡前兒童行為發展量表填寫說明 75 附錄六、學齡前兒童行為發展量表部分內容 76 附錄七、提供協助之托嬰中心與托兒所 77 表目錄 表1. 十個行政區的樣本數 45 表2. 十一個年齡組的人數分佈情形 46 表3. 手足人數 47 表4. 家中排行 48 表5. 父親年齡與教育程度 49 表6. 父親職業 50 表7. 母親年齡與教育程度 51 表8. 母親職業 52 表9. 主要照顧者 53 表10. 主要照顧者教育程度 54 表11. 主要照顧者照顧時間 55 表12. 次要照顧者 56 表13. 次要照顧者教育程度 57 表14. 次要照顧者照顧時間 58 表15. 住家樓層 59 表16. 住家坪數 60 表17. 社區型態 61 表18. 可活動的公共空間 62 表19. 11個年齡組於CCDI各方面及一般發展之發展商數的平均數與標準差 63 表20. 11個年齡組於PDOI總分之原始分數的平均數與標準差 64 表21. PDOI總分之原始分數與CCDI各面向及一般發展之原始分數的相關 65 表22. 以PDOI總分之原始分數與CCDI「一般發展」之原始分數的平均數間隔1個標準差為分組的標準之劃記表 66 表23. 以PDOI總分之原始分數與CCDI「一般發展」之原始分數的平均數間隔1個標準差為分組的標準之預期表 67 表24. 以PDOI總分之原始分數與CCDI「一般發展」之原始分數的四分位數為分組的標準之劃記表 68 表25. 以PDOI總分之原始分數與CCDI「一般發展」之原始分數的四分位數為分組的標準之預期表 69 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 嬰幼兒日常職能活動量表之同時效度 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Concurrent Validity of the Pediatric Daily Occupation Inventory | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 93-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 姚開屏(Kai-Ping Yao),毛慧芬(Hui-Fen Mao) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 效度,嬰幼兒日常職能活動量表,日常職能活動參與,嬰幼兒, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | validity,occupation participation,infants and toddlers,Pediatric Daily Occupation Inventory, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 77 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2005-02-21 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 職能治療研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 職能治療學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-94-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 505.44 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。