請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/38971完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 蘇永成 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chia-Hui Shen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 沈佳慧 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T16:55:06Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2015-01-01 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2005-07-04 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2005-06-10 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. Admati, A. and P. Pfleiderer, 1988, “A Theory of Intraday Patterns: Volume and Price Variability,” Review of Financial Studies, 1, 3-40.
2. Barclay, M. and J. Warner, 1993, “Stealth Trading and Volatility,” Journal of Financial Economics, 34, 281-305. 3. Barclay, M. J., T. Hendershott and D. T. Mccormick, 2003, “Competition Among Trading Venues: Information and Trading on Electronic Communications Networks,” Journal of Finance 58, 2637-2666. 4. Bernard, B. S., 2002, “An Empirical Study of the Mixture of Time and Movements in Prices,” Department of Finance and Statistics, Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration. 5. Bessembinder, H. and M. Kaufman, 1997, “A Cross-exchange Comparison of Execution Costs and Information Flow for NYSE-listed Stocks,” Journal of Financial Economics 46, 293-320. 6. Bollerslev, T., 1986, “Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity,” Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307-327. 7. Booth, G. G., J. C. Lin, T. Martikainen, and Y. Tse, 2002, “Trading and Pricing in Upstairs and Downstairs Stock Markets,” Review of Financial Studies, 15, 1111-1135. 8. Campbell, J. Y., S. J. Grossman, and J. Wang, 1993, “Trading Volume and Serial Correlation in Stock Returns,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 905-939. 9. Chakravarty, S., 2001, “Stealth-trading: Which Traders’ Trades Move Stock Prices?” Journal of Financial Economics, 61, 289-307 10. Chordia, T. and A. Subrahmanyam, 1998, “Order Imbalance and Individual Stock Returns,” the eScholarship Repository, University of California. 11 Chordia, T., R. Roll, and A. Subrahmanyam, 2004, “Order Imbalance, Liquidity, and Market Returns,” Journal of Financial Economics, 72, 486-518. 12. Chordia, T., R. Roll, and A. Subrahmanyam, 2002, “Order Imbalance, Liquidity, and Market Returns,” Journal of Financial Economics, 65, 111-130. 13. Ciner C., 2003, “Return-Volume Dynamics of Individual Stocks: Evidence from an Emerging Market,” College of Business Administration of Northeastern University. 14. Copeland, T. E., 1976, “A model of Asset Trading under the Assumption of Sequential Information Arrival,” Journal of Finance, 31, 1149-1168. 15. Easley, D., Kiefer, N. and O’Hara, M., 1997b, “One Day in the Life of a Very Common Stock,” Review of Financial Studies 10, 805-835. 16. Easley,D., Kiefer, N. and O’Hara, M., 1997a, “The Information Content of the Trading Process,” Journal of Empirical Finance 4, 159-186. 17. Epps, T. and M. Epps, 1976, “The Stochastic Dependence of Security Price Changes and Transaction Volumes: Implications for the Mixture-of-distributions Hypothesis,” Econometrica, 44, 305-321. 18. F. A. Wang, 1998, “Strategic Trading, Asymmetric Information and Heterogeneous Prior Beliefs,” Journal of Financial Markets, 1,321-352. 19. Foster, D. F. and S. Viswanathan, 1994, “Strategic Trading with Asymmetric Informed Traders and Long-Lived Information,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 29, 499-518. 20. Foster, D. F. and S. Viswanathan, 1996, “Strategic Trading When Agents Forecast the Forecasts of Others,” Journal of Finance, 51, 1437-1478. 21. Gallant, R., P. Rossi, and G. Tauchen, 1992, “Stock Prices and Volume,” Review of Financial Studies, 5, 199-242. 22. He, H., and J. Wang, 1995, “Differential Information and Dynamic Behavior of Trading Volume,” Review of Financial Studies, 8, 919-972. 23. Heflin, F., and K. W. Shaw, 2000 “Trade Size and the Adverse Selection Component of the Spread: Which Trades Are 'Big'?” 24. Hong, H., and J. Wang, 2000, “Trading and Returns under Periodic Market Closures,” Journal of Finance, 55, 297-354. 25. Jennings, R. H., L. T. Starks, and J. C. Fellingham, 1981, “ An Equilibrium Model of Asset Trading with Sequential Information Arrival,” Journal of Finance, 36, 143-161. 26. Jones, C., G. Kaul, and M. Lipson, 1994, “Transactions, Volume and Volatility,” Review of Financial Studies, 7, 631-652. 27. Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky, 1979, “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk,” Econometrica, 47, 263-291. 28. Karpoff, J., 1987, “The Relation between Price Changes and Trading Volume: A Survey,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 22, 109-126. 29. Kyle, A., 1985, “Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading,” Econometrica, 53, 1315-1335. 30. Lamoureux, C., and W. Lastrapes, 1990, “Heteroskedasticity in Stock Return Data: Volume versus GARCH Effects,” Journal of Finance, 45, 221-229. 31. Lee, Y. T., Y.J. Liu, R. Roll and A. Subrahmanyam, 2003, “Order Imbalances and Market Efficiency: Evidence from the Taiwan Stock Exchange,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 20 01 32. Lin, C. M., 2003, “Information Asymmetry and Return-Volume Relation: A Time Varying Model based upon Order Imbalance and Individual Stock,” Graduate Institute of Finance of National Taiwan University. 33 Lin, J.C., 2004, “Price-Volume Relation: A Time Varying Model with Censored and Camouflage Effects,” Graduate Institute of Finance of National Taiwan University. 34. Lin, J. C., G. C. Sanger, and G. G. Booth, 1995, “Trade Size and Components of the Bid-Ask Spread,” Review of Financial Studies, 8, 1153-1183. 35. Llorente, G., R. Michaely, G. Saar, and J. Wang, 2002, “Dynamic Volume-Return Relation of Individual Stocks,” Review of Financial Studies, 15, 1005-1047. 36. Lo, A. and J. Wang, 2000, “Trading Volume: Definitions, Data Analysis, and Implications of Portfolio Theory,” Review of Financial Studies, 13, 257-300. 37. Lo, A. W. and A. C. MacKinlay, 1990, “An Econometric Analysis of Nonsynchronous Trading,” Journal of Econometrics, 45, 181-211. 38. Lo, A. W., and A. C. MacKinlay, 1988, “Stock Market Prices do not Follow Random Walks: Evidence from a Simple Specification Test,” Review of Financial Studies, 1, 41-66. 39. Wang, J., 1993, “A Model of Intertemporal Asset Prices Under Asymmetric Information,” Review of Economic Studies, 60, 249-282. 40. Wang, J., 1994, “A Model of Competitive Stock Trading Volume,” Journal of Political Economy, 102, 127-168. 41. Yu, Y. H., 2002, “Information Asymmetry and Price-Volume Relations,” Graduate Institute of Business Administration of National Taiwan University. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/38971 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 股票市場中沒有資訊的交易人總是希望能尋找出一個可以反映資訊擁有者所握有的資訊的指標。若能成功找出這個指標，即使並非身為資訊擁有者，也能根據觀察資訊擁有者交易行為中的資訊意涵，據以發展出能使其獲利的交易策略。根據以往的研究，買賣單不對稱極可能是反映隱含私有資訊的一個重要指標。 本文的主旨即在探討NASDAQ 漲幅最大的各股其日內報酬率與買賣單不對稱之間是否真的存在顯著的正向關係。
在進行實證之前，我們先以GARCH (1,1)的模型去測試該模型是否能配適於我們所樣本中的時間序列資料。以了解本文中實證資料的屬性。經過測試後我們發現，對於超過七成的樣本GARCH (1,1)模型可成功描述其隨時間變動的特性。 而本文的主要實證結果為，在所使用的樣本---NASDAQ最大漲幅投機型個股日內資料中, 當期的買賣單不對稱的確與該期的股票報酬率有顯著的正向關係存在。然而前期的買賣單不對稱與當期報酬率間關係卻不顯著。 最後，由於公司資本規模一向被用作衡量該個股資訊不對稱程度的代理變數之一。本論文最後，我們將探討公司的資本規模與買賣單不對稱之間，是否有小型股效果存在，以作為日後選股的參考依據。然而，我們的實證結果僅發現，取過對數的資本市值與買賣單不對稱的係數之間確有負向關係存在，但是此負向關係並不顯著，因此無法就此結果對於小型股效果是否存在加以評論。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In this article, our main purpose is to explore the relationship between order imbalances and stock returns. Considering the liquidity and the efficiency of the market we research, we selected our samples from NASDAQ daily top gainers. We are curious about what factor makes these attractive top gainers win such remarkable positive returns in such a short time period. According to former studies, we decide that order imbalance of the individual stocks might be a proxy that reveals the insiders’ private information and thus it might be a critical factor in influencing stock returns.
Before testing whether there are some special relationships exist between stock returns and order imbalances, we have to make judgments on the properties of our data. First we apply GARCH (1,1) model to see whether it can fit our time series data. In our research, we found that for over 70% of our sample stocks, the GARCH (1,1) model can successfully captured their time-variant proprieties. We also found that either by using the FORTRAN program or by using regression models, contemporaneous order imbalances both have a significant influence on the contemporaneous stock returns. However, the influence weakened when lagged order imbalances are employed. As for the test of small firm effect, we see a negative relationship between a firm’s logged market capitalization and its current order imbalance coefficients. However, the relationship is not significant. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T16:55:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-94-R92723008-1.pdf: 500793 bytes, checksum: 8043cc91cbfa0899542f18e2d5146717 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Chapter 1 Introduction 3
1.1 Motives and Purposes 3 1.2 Frame Work of the Thesis 6 Chapter 2 Literature Review 7 2.1 Traders’ Behaviors under Information Asymmetry 7 2.2 Price-Volume Relations 11 Chapter 3. Data 17 3.1 Data Sources 17 3.2 Descriptive Statistics 20 Chapter 4 Methodology 22 4.1 GARCH(1,1)model 22 4.2 Contemporaneous order imbalance model 24 4.3 Lagged order imbalance model 25 4.4 Small firm effect test 26 Chapter 5 Empirical Results 29 5.1 GARCH (1,1) test 29 5.2 Contemporaneous order imbalance tests 29 5.3 Lagged order imbalance tests 30 5.4 Small firm effect test 30 Chapter 6 Conclusions 32 6.1 Summary of our findings in this article 32 6.2 Suggestions for further researches 34 Figures and Tables 36 References - 66 - | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 買賣單不對稱 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 資訊不對稱 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 價量關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Information asymmetry | en |
| dc.subject | Order Imbalance | en |
| dc.title | NASDAQ最大漲幅投機型個股之日內
報酬率-買賣單不對稱關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Intraday Return – Order Imbalance Relation in NASDAQ Speculative Top Gainers | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 93-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳明賢,王耀輝 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 資訊不對稱,價量關係,買賣單不對稱, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Information asymmetry,Order Imbalance, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 68 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2005-06-10 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 財務金融學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 財務金融學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-94-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 489.06 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。