Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/3895Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 姚開屏(Kai-Ping Yao) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Po-Yu Hsieh | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 謝博瑜 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-13T08:38:10Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2016-08-24 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-13T08:38:10Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2016-08-24 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2016-07-15 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文文獻
石泱. (2009). 不同居住型態老人社會支持與生活適應影響因素之研究. 東吳社會工作學報,(21), 27-53. 「人口年齡分配」(民104年)。內政部戶政司。取自http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/year/list.htm 「老人狀況調查：65歲以上的老年人理想居住安排類型」(民91、94、98、102年)。內政部統計處。取自http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/survey.aspx 「我國老人安養及長期照顧概況」(民國93~101年)。內政部統計處。取自http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/week/list.htm 吳淑瓊, & 莊坤洋. (2001). 在地老化: 台灣二十一世紀長期照護的政策方向.台灣衛誌, 20(3), 192-201. 李月萍, & 黃惠子. (2014). 老年生活品質概念與測量應用. 台灣老年醫學暨老年學雜誌, 9(3), 57-67. 林怡君, 余豎文, & 張宏哲. (2004). 新店地區機構和非機構老人憂鬱情形及相關因素之調查. 台灣家庭醫學雜誌, 14(2), 81-93. 林茂榮, 姚開屏, 黃景祥, & 王榮德. (1999). 台灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷量尺語詞的選擇. 台灣公共衛生雜誌, 18(4), 262-270. 姚開屏 (2002)。健康生活品質概念與測量原理之簡介。台灣醫學會，6(2)，183-192。 姚開屏 (2005)。台灣簡明版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷之發展及使用手冊第二版。 姚開屏、林茂榮、王榮德 (2000)。同質團體與異質團體在選擇量表量尺語詞上的比較研究。中華心理學刊，42(2)，141-153。 施麗紅 (2010)。老人入住長期照顧機構行為初探以自我決定理論析之。社區發展季刊，132，353-372。 高淑貴,、周欣宜 (2008)。推動在地老化策略之研究—以[建立社區照顧關懷據點計畫] 為例。生物產業傳播暨發展學系期刊論文，53，35-48。 張桂霖、張金鶚 (2010)。老人居住安排與居住偏好之轉換: 家庭價值與交換理論觀點的探討。Journal of Population Studies，40，41-90。 張隆順 (1985)。老人心理學。桂冠圖書公司。台北市。 郭乃文、劉秀枝、王珮芳、廖光淦、甄瑞興、林恭平、陳祖裕、徐道昌 (1988)。 [簡短式智能評估] 之中文施測與常模建立。 中華民國復健醫學會雜誌，(16)， 52-59。 陳肇男 (1993)。台灣地區鰥寡老人之居住安排。中國社會學刊，17，163-179。 楊靜利 (1999)。老年居住安排: 子女數量與同居傾向因素之探討。人口學刊， 20，167-183。 劉弘煌 (2002)。老人家庭照顧期待之代間落差。 實踐學報，33，287-303。 薛承泰 (2008)。臺灣家庭變遷與老人居住型態: 現況與未來。社區發展季刊，121，47-56。 謝美娥 (2004)。失能老人的資源, 居住安排, 居住決定的掌控力與生活品質: 一個量化的初探。社會政策與社會工作學刊，8 (1)，1-49。 簡啟文、王榮德、姚開屏、李勤岸、謝清麟 (2005)。閩南語版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷中量尺語詞之選擇。臺灣醫學， 9(5)， 584-594。 英文文獻 Alexander, J., & Willems, E. (1981). Quality of life: some measurement requirements. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 62(6), 261-265. Baldwin, N., Harris, J., & Kelly, D. (1993). Institutionalisation: why blame the institution? Ageing and Society, 13(01), 69-81. Bentler, P. M. (1992). On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychological bulletin, 112(3), 400. Bollen, K. A. (2014). Structural equations with latent variables: John Wiley & Sons. Borglin, G., Edberg, A.-K., & Hallberg, I. R. (2005). The experience of quality of life among older people. Journal of Aging Studies, 19(2), 201-220. Borsboom, D. (2006). When does measurement invariance matter? Medical care, 44(11), S176-S181. Bowling, A. (1995). Measuring disease: a review of disease-specific quality of life measurement scales: Open University Press. Bowling, A., Banister, D., Sutton, S., Evans, O., & Windsor, J. (2002). A multidimensional model of the quality of life in older age. Aging and mental health, 6(4), 355-371. Bowling, A., & Windsor, J. (2001). Towards the good life: A population survey of dimensions of quality of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2(1), 55-82. Browne, J., O'Boyle, C., McGee, H., Joyce, C., McDonald, N., O'Malley, K., & Hiltbrunner, B. (1994). Individual quality of life in the healthy elderly. Quality of life research, 3(4), 235-244. Browne, M. W., Cudeck, R., Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage focus editions, 154, 136-136. Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological bulletin, 105(3), 456. Chan, A. C.-M. (1996). Clinical validation of the geriatric depression scale (GDS) Chinese version. Journal of aging and health, 8(2), 238-253. Chattopadhyay, A., & Marsh, R. (1999). Changes in living arrangement and familial support for the elderly in Taiwan: 1963-1991. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 523-537. Chen, F. (2007). Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464-504. Chen, X., & Silverstein, M. (2000). Intergenerational social support and the psychological well-being of older parents in China. Research on aging, 22(1), 43-65. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233-255. Chien, C.-W., Wang, J.-D., Yao, G., Sheu, C.-F., & Hsieh, C.-L. (2007). Development and validation of a WHOQOL-BREF Taiwanese audio player-assisted interview version for the elderly who use a spoken dialect. Quality of life research, 16(8), 1375-1381. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological bulletin, 112(1), 155. Crum, R. M., Anthony, J. C., Bassett, S. S., & Folstein, M. F. (1993). Population-based norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination by age and educational level. Jama, 269(18), 2386-2391. Demura, S., & Sato, S. (2003). Relationships between depression, lifestyle and quality of life in the community dwelling elderly: a comparison between gender and age groups. Journal of physiological anthropology and applied human science, 22(3), 159-166. Fang, J., Power, M., Lin, Y., Zhang, J., Hao, Y., & Chatterji, S. (2012). Development of short versions for the WHOQOL-OLD module. Gerontologist, 52(1), 66-78. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnr085 Farquhar, M. (1995a). Elderly people's definitions of quality of life. Social science & medicine, 41(10), 1439-1446. Farquhar, M. (1995b). Definitions of quality of life: a taxonomy. Journal of advanced nursing, 22(3), 502-508. Feldt, L. S., Woodruff, D. J., & Salih, F. A. (1987). Statistical inference for coefficient alpha. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11(1), 93-103. Gabriel, Z., & Bowling, A. N. N. (2004). Quality of life from the perspectives of older people. Ageing and Society, 24(05), 675-691. Garner, J. D., & Mercer, S. O. (1982). Meeting the needs of the elderly: home health care or institutionalization? Health & social work, 7(3), 183-191. Gerritsen, D. L., Steverink, N., Ooms, M. E., & Ribbe, M. W. (2004). Finding a useful conceptual basis for enhancing the quality of life of nursing home residents. Quality of life research, 13(3), 611-624. Groger, L. (1995). A nursing home can be a home. Journal of Aging Studies, 9(2), 137-153. Guilford, J. (1956). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. New York: McGraw-Hill. Gurland, B. (1992). The impact of depression on quality of life of the elderly. Clinics in geriatric medicine, 8(2), 377-386. Hattie, J., & Cooksey, R. W. (1984). Procedures for assessing the validities of tests using the' known-groups' method. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8(3), 295-305. Himes, C. L., Hogan, D. P., & Eggebeen, D. J. (1996). Living arrangements of minority elders. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 51(1), S42-S48. Högman, A.-K. (2001). Elderly migrants in a northern Swedish town in the nineteenth century; ELDERLY MIGRANTS IN NINETEENTH-CENTURY SWEDEN; ANN-KRISTIN HöGMAN. Continuity and change, 16(3), 423. Horn, J. L., & McArdle, J. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental aging research, 18(3), 117-144. Horn, J. L., McArdle, J. J., & Mason, R. (1983). When is invariance not invarient: A practical scientist's look at the ethereal concept of factor invariance. Southern Psychologist. Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. Hwang, H.-F., Liang, W.-M., Chiu, Y.-N., & Lin, M.-R. (2003). Suitability of the WHOQOL-BREF for community-dwelling older people in Taiwan. Age and ageing, 32(6), 593-600. Jacobzone, S., Cambois, E., Chaplain, E., & Robine, J. M. (1999). The health of older persons in OECD countries. Kutner, N. G., Ory, M. G., Baker, D. I., Schechtman, K. B., Hornbrook, M. C., & Mulrow, C. D. (1992). Measuring the quality of life of the elderly in health promotion intervention clinical trials. Public Health Reports, 107(5), 530. Lawton, M. P. (1991). A multidimensional view of quality of life in frail elders. The concept and measurement of quality of life in the frail elderly, 4-27. Leung, K., Tay, M., Cheng, S., & Lin, F. (1997). Hong Kong Chinese version World Health Organization quality of life measure-abbreviated version. WHOQOL-BREF (HK). Lowenthal, M. F., & Haven, C. (1968). Interaction and adaptation: Intimacy as a critical variable. American Sociological Review, 20-30. Lucas-Carrasco, R., Laidlaw, K., & Power, M. J. (2011). Suitability of the WHOQOL-BREF and WHOQOL-OLD for Spanish older adults. Aging & mental health, 15(5), 595-604. Maddox, G. L. (1963). Activity and morale: A longitudinal study of selected elderly subjects. Social forces, 42(2), 195-204. Markides, K. S., & Martin, H. W. (1979). A causal model of life satisfaction among the elderly. Journal of Gerontology, 34(1), 86-93. McKeon, R. (1947). Aristotle's Conception of the Development and the Nature of Scientific Method. Journal of the History of Ideas, 8(1), 3-44. Meade, A. W., & Bauer, D. J. (2007). Power and precision in confirmatory factor analytic tests of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(4), 611-635. Meade, A. W., Johnson, E. C., & Braddy, P. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 568-592. Mollenkopf, H., & Walker, A. (2007). Quality of life in old age: Springer. Murphy, K., Cooney, A., Shea, E. O., & Casey, D. (2009). Determinants of quality of life for older people living with a disability in the community. Journal of advanced nursing, 65(3), 606-615. Mutchler, J. E., & Burr, J. A. (1991). Racial differences in health and health care service utilization in later life: the effect of socioeconomic status. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 342-356. Newsom, J. T., & Schulz, R. (1996). Social support as a mediator in the relation between functional status and quality of life in older adults. Psychology and aging, 11(1), 34. Pastalan, L. A. (1990). Aging in place: The role of housing and social supports (Vol. 6): Psychology Press. Pezzin, L. E., Pollak, R. A., & Schone, B. S. (2007). Efficiency in family bargaining: Living arrangements and caregiving decisions of adult children and disabled elderly parents. CESifo Economic Studies, 53(1), 69-96. Power, M. (2003). Development of a common instrument for quality of life. EUROHIS: Developing common instruments for health surveys, 57, 145. Power, M., Quinn, K., & Schmidt, S. (2005). Development of the WHOQOL-Old Module. Quality of life research, 14(10), 2197-2214. Puts, M., Shekary, N., Widdershoven, G., Heldens, J., Lips, P., & Deeg, D. (2007). What does quality of life mean to older frail and non-frail community-dwelling adults in the Netherlands? Quality of life research, 16(2), 263-277. Rejeski, W. J., & Mihalko, S. L. (2001). Physical activity and quality of life in older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 56(suppl 2), 23-35. Rocha, N. S., Power, M. J., Bushnell, D. M., & Fleck, M. P. (2012). The EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index: comparative psychometric properties to its parent WHOQOL-BREF. VALUE IN HEALTH, 15(3), 449-457. Sarvimäki, A., & Stenbock‐Hult, B. (2000). Quality of life in old age described as a sense of well‐being, meaning and value. Journal of advanced nursing, 32(4), 1025-1033. Sheldon, E. B., & Moore, W. E. (1968). Indicators of Social Change: Concepts and Measurements: Concepts and Measurements: Russell Sage Foundation. Srapyan, Z., Armenian, H. K., & Petrosyan, V. (2006). Health-related quality of life and depression among older people in Yerevan, Armenia: a comparative survey of retirement home and household residents aged 65 years old and over. Age and ageing, 35(2), 190-193. Sudnongbua, S., LaGrow, S., & Boddy, J. (2010). Feelings of abandonment and quality of life among older persons in rural northeast Thailand. J Cross Cult Gerontol, 25. Szabo, S. (1996). The World Health Organization quality of life (WHOQOL) assessment instrument. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials, 2, 355-362. The WHOQOL group. (1994). Development of the WHOQOL: Rationale and current status. International Journal of Mental Health, 23(3), 24-56. The WHOQOL group. (1995). The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization. Social science & medicine, 41(10), 1403-1409. The WHOQOL group. (1998a). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28(03), 551. The WHOQOL group. (1998b). The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Social science & medicine, 46(12), 1569-1585. Tombaugh, T. N., & McIntyre, N. J. (1992). The mini‐mental state examination: a comprehensive review. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 40(9), 922-935. Van Marwijk, H., Wallace, P., de Bock, G. H., Hermans, J., Kaptein, A. A., & Mulder, J. D. (1995). Evaluation of the feasibility, reliability and diagnostic value of shortened versions of the geriatric depression scale. British journal of general practice, 45(393), 195-199. Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational research methods, 3(1), 4-70. Walker, A., & Mollenkopf, H. (2007). International and Multi-Disciplinary Perspectives on Quality of Life in Old Age: Conceptual Issues. In H. Mollenkopf & A. Walker (Eds.), Quality of Life in Old Age: International and Multi-Disciplinary Perspectives (pp. 3-13). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. WHO. (1996). WHOQOL-BREF: introduction, administration, scoring and generic version of the assessment: field trial version, December 1996. Wilmoth, J. M. (1998). Living arrangement transitions among America's older adults. The Gerontologist, 38(4), 434-444. Yao, G., & Chien, C. C. (2013). Validation of the WHOQOL-OLD in Taiwan. VALUE IN HEALTH, 16(7), A598. Yao, G., Chung, C.-W., Yu, C.-F., & Wang, J.-D. (2002). Development and verification of validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, 101(5), 342-351. Ye, R. F., Zhang, M. L., & Deng, W. P. (2008). Correlative analysis between received support, anticipated support and quality of life in retired elderly patients. Chin J of Behav Med Sci, 17. Yesavage, J. A., & Sheikh, J. I. (1986). 9/Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) recent evidence and development of a shorter violence. Clinical gerontologist, 5(1-2), 165-173. Zhan, L. (1992). Quality of life: conceptual and measurement issues. Journal of advanced nursing, 17(7), 795-800. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/3895 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 近年來台灣老年人口的不斷的攀升，據經建會估計，2018年老年人口將超過總人口的14%，正式步入高齡社會。越來越多人開始關注老年人的生活，老年生活品質測量也因此變得更為重要。世界衛生組織所發展的生活品質問卷(WHOQOL)，除了測量常見的生活品質範疇(WHOQOL-100、WHOQOL-BREF)外，亦針對老年族群編製了外加模組(WHOQOL-OLD)，希望能完整捕捉老年生活品質的面貌。在台灣，世界衛生組織問卷使用非常廣泛，但是有關該問卷應用於老年人的心理計量研究卻不為多見，因此本研究希望能針對WHOQOL問卷於台灣老年人的應用狀況進行探討，以提供未來老年相關研究有效的生活品質測量工具。研究一欲驗證不同的WHOQOL問卷版本於台灣老年人的信度與效度。發現台灣簡明版WHOQOL-BREF於台灣老年人使用上效度略差，但是其短版EUROHIS-8則有良好的信效度表現；WHOQOL-OLD與其短版中的第三版則具有良好的心理計量特性。研究二，依據不同的居住情境，將社區、機構老年人分群，確立問卷於兩群人的心理計量特性並進行WHOQOL問卷的生活品質分數比較。結果指出在台灣簡明版WHOQOL-BREF的社會範疇、WHOQOL-OLD的感官能力、社會參與、死亡觀、親密感層面分數上，兩群人差異達顯著。研究三，企圖建立應用於台灣老年人，心理計量特性表現更好的WHOQOL短版，然而目前尚未發現信度與效度表現皆優於過去的版本，故仍建議使用國外現有的短版。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In recent years, Taiwan's aged population are consistently getting growth. According to the reports of CEPD that the aged population will exceed 14% of the total population in 2018, the Taiwan will become the aged society. As a result, studies on the issue of elders’ life are increasingly received attention, especially for developing appropriate measurements of elders' quality of life (QOL). The World Health Organization had developed a questionnaire to measure QOL, called WHOQOL. Attempting to capture the entire QOL of elders, the WHOQOL contains not only common domains of QOL but also an add-on module (WHOQOL-OLD) for elders. Although the WHOQOL is widely used in Taiwan, its applicability for the elders in Taiwan is rarely investigated. The objectives of this study are to examine the psychometric properties of the WHOQOL and to provide a useful instrument which can appropriately measure QOL for elders in Taiwan.
In study1, the reliability and validity in different versions of WHOQOL were examined. The results showed that the reliability and validity of the short version, EUROHIS, have a good performance relative to the WHOQOL-BREF (Taiwan’s version). The psychometric properties of the WHOQOL-OLD and its short version (V3) were also acceptable, with high reliability and validity. Study 2 compared the scores of the WHOQOL between community-dwelling and nursing home resident. Social domain of the WHOQOL-BREF (Taiwan version) as well as the majority of the facets of the WHOQOL-OLD including sensory ability, death and dying, social participation, intimacy facets achieved statistically significant differences. In study 3, this study attempted to establish more suitable short version for Taiwan’s elders, yet the psychometric properties of this new version performed worse than the previous version. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-13T08:38:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R02227122-1.pdf: 3332406 bytes, checksum: ee11a65eefb80f7b076ffc6660cd8e09 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 前言與文獻回顧 1
第一節 生活品質概念的發展 1 第二節 生活品質的測量：WHOQOL問卷 4 第三節 WHOQOL實際應用上的問題 14 第四節 台灣老年人的生活品質測量 16 第五節 研究目的 21 第二章 研究一 23 第一節 研究目的 23 第二節 研究方法 23 第三節 研究結果 31 第四節 小結與討論 39 第三章 研究二 43 第一節 研究目的 43 第二節 研究方法 43 第三節 研究結果 47 第四節 小結與討論 62 第四章 研究三 67 第一節 研究目的 67 第二節 研究方法 67 第三節 研究結果 70 第四節 小結與討論 85 第五章 討論 87 第一節 總結 87 第二節 研究限制 89 第三節 未來研究方向 90 參考文獻 93 附錄 103 附錄一 研究問卷 103 附錄二 題項相關矩陣 111 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 世界衛生組織生活品質問卷應用於台灣老年人之心理計量研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Psychometric Study on the WHOQOL Questionnaires in Elders of Taiwan | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 劉立凡(Li-Fan Liu),謝清麟(Ching-Lin Hsieh) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 老年人,生活品質,WHOQOL,心理計量,社區,機構, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | elder,quality of life,WHOQOL,psychometric,community-dwelling,nursing home, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 112 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201600918 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2016-07-15 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| Appears in Collections: | 心理學系 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-105-1.pdf | 3.25 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.