請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/38957完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 任立中 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chang-Yu Tsai | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 蔡昌宇 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T16:54:24Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2005-08-22 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2005-08-22 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2005-06-14 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文參考文獻
吳青松(1993),「台灣資訊電子業關鍵成功因素之探討」,中華民國管理科學學報,第十卷第一期,頁:65-71。 吳明穎(1999),「我國高科技產業經營績效之研究 – 以上市電子業為例」,國立成功大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。 王心瑩(1999),「企業經營績效與產業景氣循環之關聯 – 以臺灣半導體產業為例」,國立政治大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。 何雍慶(1983),「企業成長階段與管理制度演變之研究」,國立政治大學企業管理研究所未出版博士論文。 林富松(1990),「研究發展策略與生產力之關係 – 台灣資訊電子業之實証研究」,國立政治大學企業管理研究所未出版博士論文。 林耀南(1995),「我國高科技廠商『環境–競爭策略–績效』關聯模式之研究 – 以新竹科學工業園區廠商為例」,國立交通大學管理科學研究所未出版碩士論文。 林義屏(2001),「市場導向、組織學習、組織創新與組織績效間關係之研究 – 以科學園區資訊電子產業為例」,國立中山大學企業管理研究所未出版博士論文。 林婷鈴(2003),「廠商研發創新與行銷專屬之最適資源配置與演進」,國立台灣大學國際企業學研究所未出版博士論文。 范光榮(1994),「影響我國積體電路產業競爭優勢的因素」,國立交通大學科技管理研究所未出版碩士論文。 陳美如(1991),「科學園區高科技公司管理之優適原則」,國立交通大學管理科學研究所未出版碩士論文。 劉中淵(1992),「科學工業園區積體電路廠商策略群組與績效研究」,國立交通大學管理科學研究所未出版碩士論文。 劉儒俊(2002),「行銷資源最適配置模式 – Fuzzy AHP之應用」,國立中正大學企業管理研究所未出版博士論文。 鐘志明(1999),「新產品開發過程之資源配置與績效之關係 – 以國內製造業為例」,國立政治大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。 嚴旭良(1998),「台灣高科技產業經營績效評估與其資源配置特性之關係研究」,國立成功大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。 謝昀樺(1998),「廠商核心能力累積與未來資源投入之相關性研究 – 以台灣資訊電子業為例」,國立東華大學國際企業研究所未出版碩士論文。 高強、黃旭男、Toshiyuki Sueyoshi(2003),管理績效評估:資料包絡分析法,臺北市:華泰文化。 英文參考文獻 Aaker, D. A. (1989), “Managing assets and skills: The key to a sustainable competitive advantage,” California Management Review, Winter, pp.91-106. Aaker, D. A. (1998), Strategic Market Management, New York: John Wiley & Sons. Alchian, A. A.(1950),”Uncertainty, evolution and economic theory,” Journal of Political Economy, 58 (3), pp.211-221. Aldrich, H. (1979), Organizations and Environments, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Amit, R. and P. Schoemaker(1993),”Strategic assets and organizational rent,” Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), pp.33-46. Anderson, C. and C. P. Zeithaml (1984), “Stage of product life cycle, Business Strategy, and business performance,” Academy of Management Journal, 27, pp.5-24. Avlonitis, G. J. and S. P. Gounaris(1997),”Marketing orientation and company performance:industrial and consumer goods companies,” Industrial Marketing Management, 26, pp.385-402. Bain, J. S.(1959), Industrial Organization, New York:Wiley. Baily, M. N. (1972), “Research and development costs and returns: the U.S. pharmaceutical industry,” Journal of Political Economy, 80 (January), pp.70-85. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. (1984), “Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis”, Management Science, 30:9, 1078-1092. Barney, J.(1986),”Strategic factor markets:Expectations, Luck and Business Strategy,” Management Science, 32 (October), pp.1231-1241. Barney, J.(1991),”Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage,” Journal of Management, 17 (1), pp.99-120. Barwise, P., P. R. Marsh, and R. Wensley(1989),”Must finance and strategy clash?,” Harvard Business Review, (September), pp.85-90. Bharadwaj, S. G., P. R. Varadarajan, and J. Fahy(1993),”Sustainable competitive advantage in service industries:A conceptual model and research propositions,” Journal of Marketing, 57 (Oct), pp.83-99. Boulding, W., A. Kalra, R.Staelin, and V. A. Zeithaml(1993),”A dynamic process model of service quality:From expectations to behavioral intentions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 30 (February), pp.7-27. Boussofiane, A., Dyson, R. G. and Thanassoulis, E. (1991), “Applied Data Envelopment Analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 52, pp.1-15. Branch, B. (1974), “Research and Development activity and profitability: A distributed lag analysis,” Journal of Political Economy, 82 (September), pp.999-1011. Bunch, D. S. and R. Smiley (1992), “Who Deter Entry?: Evidence of the Use of Strategic Entry Deterrence,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 3 (Aug), pp.509-521. Chatterjee, S. and B. Wernerfelt(1991),”The Link Between Resources and Type of Diversification:Theory and Evidence,” Strategic Management Journal, 12, pp.33-48. Caves, R. E. (1980), “Industrial organization, corporate strategy and structure,” Journal of Economic Literature, 58, pp.64-92. Cave, D. W., Christensen, L. R. and Diewert, W. E. (1982a), “The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output, and Productivity,” Econometrica, Vol. 50, pp.1393-1414. Cave, D. W., Christensen, L. R. and Diewert, W. E. (1982b), “Multilateral Comparisons of Output, Input, and Productivity Using Superlative Index Numbers,” The Economic Journal, Vol. 92, pp.73-86. Cavusgil, S. T. and S. Zou (1994), “Marketing strategy-performance relationship: an investigation of the empirical link in export market ventures,” Journal of Marketing, 58(January), pp.1-21. Chandler, A. D. (1962), Strategy and Structure, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Chakravarthy, B. S. (1986), “Measuring Strategic Performance,” Strategic Management Jounal, 7, pp.437-458. Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W. (1984), “The Non-Archimedean CCR Ratio for Efficiency Analysis: A Rejoinder to Boyd and Fare,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 15, pp.333-334. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., and Rhodes, E. (1978), “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 2, pp.429-444. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., and Rhodes, E. (1978), “Short Communication: Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 3, pp.339. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Lewin, A. Y., Morey, R. C. and Rousseau, J. (1985), “Sensitivity and Stability Analysis in DEA,” Annuals of Operations Research, Vol. 2, pp.139-156. Christensen, H. K. and C. A. Montgomery (1981), “Corporate economic performance: Diversification Strategy versus Market Structure,” Strategic Management Journal, 2, pp.327-343. Churchill, N. C. and L. Virginial(1983),”The five stages of small business growth,” Harvard Business Review, (May-June), pp.30-50. Cohen, W. M. and D. A. Levinthal (1990), “Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, pp.128-152. Comanor, W. S. and T. A. Wilson (1967), “Advertising, market structure and performance,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 49 (November), pp.423-440. Conner, K. R.(1991),”An historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics:Do we have a new theory of the firm,” Journal of Management, 17, pp.121-154. Coyne, K. P.(1986),”Sustainable Competitive Advantage:What It Is and What It Isn’t,” Business Horizons, 29, pp.54-61. Day, G. S.(1994),”The capabilities of market-drive organization,” Journal of Marketing, 58 (October), pp.37-52. Day, G. S. and D. J. Reibstein(1997), Wharton on Dynamic Competitive Strategy, The Wharton School with Robert Gunther. Dickson, P. R. (1992), “Toward a General Theory of Competitive Rationality,” Journal of Marketing, 56(January), pp.69-83. Dickson, P. R.(1996),”The static and dynamic mechanics of competition:A comment on Hunt and Morgan’s comparative advantage theory,” Journal of Marketing, 60 (October), pp.102-106. Dickson, P., P. Farris, and W. Verbeke(2001),”Dynamic strategic thinking,” Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.29, pp.216-238. Dierickx, I. and K. Cool(1989),”Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage,” Management Science, 35 (12), pp.1504-1511. Drucker, P. F. (1954), The Practice of Management, New York: Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. Dvir, D., E. Segev, and A. Shenhar(1993),”Technology’s varying impact on the success of strategic business units within the Miles and Snow typology,” Strategic Management Journal, 14, pp.155-162. Eisenhardt, K. M.(1989),”Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments,” Academy of Management Journal, 32 (3), pp.543-576. Eisenhardt, K. and J. A. Martin(2000),”Dynamic capabilities:What are they?” Strategic Management Journal, Vol.21, pp.1105-1121. Eisenhardt, K. and D. N. Sull(2001),”Strategy as simple rules,” Harvard Business Review, (January), pp.32-42. Erickson, G. and R. Jacobson (1992), “Gaining Comparative Advantage Through Discretionary Expenditures: The Returns to R&D and Advertising,” Management Science, 38 (September), pp.1264-1279. Erickson, T. J., J. F. Magee, and K. N. Saad(1990),”Managing technology as a business strategy,” Sloan Management Review, (Spring), pp.73-78. Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., Lindgren, B. and Roos, P. (1992), “Productivity Changes in Swedish Pharmacies 1980-1989: A Non-Parametric Malmquist Approach,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 3, pp.85-101. Fare, R., S. Grosskopf, and C.A.K. Lovell (1994), Production Frontiers, Cambridge University Press. Farrell, M. J. (1957), “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, Vol. 120, Part 3, pp.253-281. Frederick, E. and J. Webster(1994), Market-Driven Management:Using the New Marketing Concept to Create a Customer-Oriented Company, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Fujimoto, T. (1998), “Reinterpreting the resource-capability view of the firm: a case of the development-production systems of the Japanese auto-markets,” In The Dynamic Firm, p.17. Granovetter, M.(1985),”Economic action and social structure:The problem of embeddedness,” American Journal of Sociology, 91 (3), pp.481-510. Grant, R. M. (1991), “The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation,” California Management Review, 33(Spring), pp.114-35. Grant, R. M.(1996),”Prospering in dynamically competitive environments:Organizational capability as knowledge integration,” Organization Science, 7 (4), pp.375-387. Greenley, G. E.(1995),”Market orientation and company performance:Empirical evidence from UK companies,” British Journal of Management, 6, pp.1-13. Greiner, L. E.(1972),”Evolution and revolution as organization grow,” Harvard Business Review, (July-August), pp.37-46. Gupta, A. K. and V. Covindarajan (1984), “Business unit strategy, managerial characteristics, and business unit effectiveness at strategy implementation,” Academy of Management Journal, 27, pp.25-41. Hall, R. (1992), “The strategic analysis of intangible resources,” Strategic Management Journal, 13, pp.135-144. Hall, R. (1993), “A framework linking intangible resources and capabilities to sustainable competitive advantage,” Strategic Management Journal, 14, pp.607-618. Hamel, G. and C. K. Prahalad(1991),”Corporate imagination and expeditionary marketing,” Harvard Business Review, (July-Aug.), pp.81-92. Hamel, G.(1994),”The concept of core competence,” In Hamel, G. and Heene, A. eds, Competence-Based Competition, New York:Wiley, pp.315-320. Harrison, J. and Hall, Ernest Jr and Nagundkar, Rajandra(1993),” Resource allocation as an outcropping of strategic consistency:Performance implications,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 36, No. 5 (Oct.), pp.1026-1051. Hayek, F. A.(1978), New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas. London:Routledge and Kegan Paul, Ch.12. Hayes, R. and S. Wheelwright(1979),”The Dynamics of Process-Product Life Cycle,” Harvard Business Review, (March-April), pp.127. Helfat, C. E and R. S. Raubitschek(2000),”Product sequencing:co-evolution of knowledge, capabilities and products,” Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp.961-979. Henderson, R. and I. Cockburn(1994),”Measuring competence?Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research,” Strategic Management Journal, 15 (Winter:Special Issue), pp.63-84. Herremans, I. M. and J. K. Ryans(1995),”The case for better measurement and reporting of marketing performance,” Business Horizons, 38, pp.51-60. Hibbert, E. P.(1989), The Management of International Trade Promotion, London (England);New York:Routledge. Hofer, C. W. (1975), “Toward a Contingency theory of business strategy,” Academy of Management Journal, 18, pp.784-810. Hofer, C. W. and D. Schendel (1978), Strategy Formulation: Analytical Concepts, St. Paul, MN: West Publishing. Hult, G., M. Tomas and D. J. Ketchen Jr.(2001),”Does market orientation matter?A test of the relationship between positional advantage and performance,” Strategic Management Journal, 22 (9), pp.899-906. Hunt, S. D. and R. M. Morgan(1995),”The comparative advantage theory of competition,” Journal of Marketing, 59 (April), pp.1-15. Hunt, S. D. and R. M. Morgan(1996),”The resource-based advantage theory of competition:Dynamics , Path dependent, and Evolutionary dimensions,” Journal of Marketing, 60 (October), pp.107-114. Hurley, R. F. and G. Tomas M. Hult(1998),”Innovation, market orientation, and organization learning:An integration and empirical examination,” Journal of Marketing, 62 (July), pp.42-54. Itami, H. and T. W. Roehl (1987), Mobilizing Invisible Assets, Cambridge, MA: Havard university Press. Jaworski, B. and A. Kohli(1993),”Market orientation:antecedents and consequences,” Journal of Marketing, 57 (July), pp.53-70. Judge, W. Q. and A. Miller(1991),”Antecedents and outcomes of decision speed in different environments,” Academy of Management Journal, 34 (2), pp.449-464. Kazanjian, R. K.(1983), The Organizational Evolution of High Technology Ventures:the Impact of Sage of Growth on the Nature of Structure and Planning Processes, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pennsyivania. Kessides, I. N. (1990), “The persistence of profits in U.S. Manufacturing Industries,” in Dennis Mueller (ed.), The Dynamics of Company Profits, Cambridge University Press. Kohli, A. K. and B. J. Jaworski(1990),”Market Orientation:The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications,” Journal of Marketing, 54 (April), pp.1-18. Kopalle, P. K. and D. R. Lehmann(1995),”The effects of advertised and observed quality on expectations about new product quality,” Journal of Marketing Research, 32, pp.280-290. Kotler, P. (1989), Marketing Management, 6th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Levitt, T. (1960), “Marketing myopia,” Havard Business Review, (July-August), pp.24-47. Lewin, A. Y. and J. W. Minton(1986), “Determining Organizational Effectiveness: Another Look, and an Agenda for Research,” Management Science, Vol. 32, No. 5, pp.514-538. Lippitt, G. L. and W. H. Schmidt(1967),”Crisis in a developing organization,” Harvard Business Review, (November-December), pp.102-112. Little, J. D. C.(1979),”Decision support systems for marketing managers,” Journal of Marketing, 43 (Summer), pp.9-26. Mahoney, J. T. and J. R. Pandian(1992),”The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management,” Strategic Management Journal, 13 (5), pp.363-380. Maidique, M. A. and P. Patch(1978),”Corporate strategy and technological strategy,” In Tushman, M. L. and W. L. Moore (eds.), Readings in the Management of Innovation. Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, pp.273-285. Maitland, I.(1997), How to Plan Exhibitions, London;Herndon, Va.:Cassell. Mason, E.(1949),”The current state of the monopoly problem in the U.S.,” Harvard Law Review, 62, pp.1265-1285. Miller, K. D. and P. Bromiley (1990), “Strategic risk and corporate performance: An analysis of alternative risk measures,” Academy of Management Journal, 33: 756-79. Miller, D. and J. Shamsie(1996),”The resource-based view of the firm in two environments:The Hollywood film studios from 1936 to 1965,” Academiy of Management Journal, 39 (3), pp.519-543. Mintzberg, H.(1973), The Nature of Managerial Work, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:Prentice-Hall. Mosakowski, E.(1993),”A Resource-Based Perspective on the Dynamic Strategy Performance Relationship:An Empirical Examination of the Focus and Differentiation Strategies in Entrepreneurial Firms,” Journal of Management, 19 (4), pp.819-839. Mueller, D. C. (1992), “The persistence of profits in the United States,” in Dennis Mueller (ed.), The Dynamics of Company Profits, Cambridge University Press. Narver, J. C. and S. F. Slater(1990),”The effect of market orientation on business profitability,” Journal of Marketing, 54 (October), pp.20-35. Noble, C. H., R. K. Sinha, and A. Kumar(2002),”Market orientation and alternative strategic orientations:A longitudinal assessment of performance implications,” Journal of Marketing, 66 (Oct.), pp.25-39. Penrose, E. T.(1959), The theory of the growth of the firm, London:John Wiley. Peles, Y. (1971), “Rates of amortization of advertising expenses,” Journal of Political Economy, 79 (September), pp.25-36. Peteraf, M. A.(1993),”The cornerstones of competitive advantage:A resource-based View,” Strategic Management Journal, 14, pp.179-191. Pfeffer, J. and G. R. Salancik (1978), The External Control of Organization, New York: Harper & Row. Porter, M. E.(1980), Competitive Strategy, New York: Free Press. Porter, M. E.(1996), On Competition, Harvard Business School Press. Prahalad, C. K. and G. Hamel(1990),”The core competence of the corporation,” Harvard Business Review, (March-April), pp.79-91. Rappaport, A. (1983), “Corporate performance standards and shareholder value,” Journal of Business Strategy, 4 (Spring), pp.28-38. Reed, R. and R. J. DeFillippi (1990), “Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage,” Academy of Management Review, 15, pp.88-102. Robinson, J.(1933),The Economics of Imperfect Competition, London:Macmillan. Roger, E.(1995), Diffusion of innovation, 4th edition, the Free Press, New York. Ruekert, R. W.(1992),”Developing a market orientation:An organizational strategy perspective,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 9, pp.225-245. Rumelt, R. P. (1984), “Towards a strategic theory of the firm,” In R. B. Lamb (ed.), Competitive Strategic Management, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp.556-570. Rumelt, R., D. Schendel, and D. Teece(1994),”Fundamental issues in Strategy,” Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA. Sanchez, R., A. Heene, and H. Thomas(1996),”Introduction:towards the theory and practice of competence-based competition,” In R. Sanchez, A. Heene, and H. Thomas, editors, Dynamics of competence-based competition:theory and practice in the new strategic management, Oxford, UK, London:Elsevier Science Ltd. Scherer, F. M. and D. Ross (1990), Industrial Market Structure and Economics Performance, 3rd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. Schmalensee, R. (1972), The Economics of Advertising, Amsterdam: North Holland. Scherer, F. M.(1980), Industrial Market Structure and Economic performance, Houghton Miflin Company, Boston, MA. Seiford, L. M. (1996), “Data Envelopment Analysis: the Evolution of the State of the Art (1978-1995),” Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 7, pp.99-137. Simonin, B. L. (1999), “Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances,” Strategic Management Journal, 20, pp.595-623. Snow, C. C. and L. G. Hrebiniak(1980),”Strategy, distinctive competence, and organizational performance,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, pp.317-336. Srivastava, R. K., T. A. Shervani, and L. Fahey (1998), “Market-based assets and shareholder value: a framework for analysis,” Journal of Marketing, 62 (January), pp.2-18. Sueyoshi, T. and Aoki, S. (2001), “A Use of a Nonparametric Statistic for DEA Frontier Shift: The Kruskal and Wallis Rank Test,” OMEGA: International Journal of Management Science, Vol. 29, pp.1-18. Sueyoshi, T. and Goto, M. S. (2001), “Slack-adjusted DEA for Time Series Analysis: Performance Measurement of Japanese Electric Power Generation Industry in 1984-1993,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 133, pp.232-259. Teece, D. J.(1982),”Towards and economic theory of the multiproduct firm,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, pp.39-63. Teece, D. J.(1984),”Economic analysis and strategic management,” California Management Review, 26 (3), pp.87-110. Teece, D., G. Pisano, and A. Shuen(1997),”Dynamic capabilities and strategic management,” Strategic Management Journal, 18 (7), pp.509-533. Thain, D. H.(1969),”Stages of corporate development,” Business Quarterly, Vol. 34, pp.33-47. Verdin, P. J. and P. J. Williamson(1992),”Core Competence, Competitive Advantage and Industry Structure,” Working paper, INSEAD, France, Presented at The Strategic Management Society, International Workshop in Belgium. Wansink, B. and M. L. Ray(1996),”Advertising strategies to increase usage frequency,” Journal of Marketing, 60 (January), pp.31-46. Wernerfelt, B.(1984),”A resource-based view of the firm,” Strategic Management Journal, 5, pp.171-180. Wright, A. A. and R. J. Lutz(1994),”Cognitive response to new product advertising and trial:Attentional and interpretational framing effects,” Journal of Consumer Research, 21, pp.45-62. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/38957 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 現今市場環境隨著資訊科技的迅速發展,產品生命週期也不斷地加速縮短中,廠商如何在面對著快速變動的產業環境下,不斷檢視、培養與調整自身的動態能力以追求持久性的競爭優勢,成為決定廠商能否長久維持營運獲利的主要關鍵。此種動態能力的調整過程,不僅需要面對來自於目標市場消費者對產品屬性及利益的認知變化,更要面對來自外在市場特性的改變以及本身營運成長的演進下,所衍生出對於不同資源與能力類別之要求的挑戰,因此對於廠商資源能力的研究焦點,不僅只著重於資源與能力類別的區分,而更應該強調這些資源及能力是如何有效產生顧客價值、進而影響到廠商的經營績效。
本研究透過對行銷及策略相關文獻的探討,建立出廠商「研發創新」及「行銷專屬」兩大資源投入活動所形成之阻絕機制的差異,進而導出一個成功企業的經營,所必須具備的核心活動在於,透過產品或服務以有效傳遞出顧客價值,藉此獲得競爭上的優勢,並最終反應在較佳的營運績效表現上。其中,研發創新能力,有助於企業為顧客創造價值,進而獲得競爭優勢。而行銷專屬能力,則是企業透過行銷活動的推展,在目標消費者心中建立起心理上的獨佔地位,以鞏固研發創新能力所投入的成果,能夠有效專屬並反應在企業的營運績效表現上。 本研究藉由資料包絡分析法以針對台灣資訊電子業廠商進行實證,探討廠商彼此間對於上述兩類資源投入活動的差異,是否將對其經營效率表現,產生不同程度的影響效果,同時此種影響效果是否又與廠商所身處之外在環境的市場特性差異有所關連。此外,透過對觀察期間內個別廠商於效率指標成長情形的比較分析,以尋求面對不同市場特性之廠商在「研發創新」與「行銷專屬」兩資源投入活動的配置行為,是否將會影響其效率指標的成長表現,進而建立起不同市場特性下之廠商其最適資源配置的移動軌跡。最後,則根據廠商所位處之企業生命週期階段的差異,探討隨著成長階段的演進,其「研發創新」與「行銷專屬」兩資源配置比例的變動趨勢,歸結本研究的主要結論有: 一、廠商所處之最終市場接近性的不同,將決定「研發創新」與「行銷專屬」兩投資活動對廠商經營績效的影響效果。 二、位處於不同類型之市場接近性的廠商,隨著其資源規模的擴張,而有不同的資源配置移動軌跡,同時投資策略重心若能配合所處市場環境的特質、以及投資策略可以有效保持前後的連慣性,將能為廠商帶來高生產力成長表現。 三、位處於不同類型之市場接近性的廠商,隨著企業成長階段的演進,呈現出一致性的資源配置移動軌跡,然而隨著市場接近性程度越高,將反應在廠商對行銷專屬活動的資源投入水準越高、以及彼此間的資源配置行為差異性越大。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The ability to continuously review, adjust and cultivate the dynamic capability in order to maintain sustainable competitive advantage becomes a major factor deciding whether or not a corporation can possess long-term profits. This process of dynamic accommodation not only faces the challenge of varying preferences from target customers but also the challenge of requirements for different resources and capabilities that companies must maintain owing to the transformations of exterior market structure and interior corporate maturity. Therefore, the research can’t merely focus on the classification of different types of resources and capabilities, but puts more emphasis on the relationship between resource allocating behavior and firm’s performance of business efficiency.
By integrating the concepts about business competence from Marketing and Strategy theories, we identify two significant resource allocation activities and their own barrier effects upon other rival companies in the market. One is the resource invested in the activities of creating product value such as R&D expenses and it focuses on enhancing value creation and gaining competitive advantage. The other is the resource invested for the purpose of supporting the marketing appropriation activities like advertising or promotion expenses and it focuses on appropriating the product value and building an effective barrier to other competitors. This research adopts the method of Data Envelopment Analysis to measure the performance of business efficiency and tries to make a connection between the performance and resource allocating behavior. The factors decide good or bad performance of companies including different kinds of resource allocating strategies, which are further affected by characters of market environment and stages of business life cycle. The main results of this research are as follows, 1.Accessibility to the market determines the impact of R&D innovation and marketing appropriation activities on the performance of business efficiency. 2.Firms with different kinds of market accessibility reveal divergent patterns of resource allocation trajectories, and the key factors influencing the performance of business efficiency include the correct focus of resource allocation and the consistence of long-term resource allocating strategy. 3.Firms in different stages of business life cycle will equally put more emphasis on marketing activities as their life cycles evolve. However, as the accessibility of the market becomes higher, firms in the same stage of business life cycle tend to allocate more resources in marketing activities and show greater divergence in their resource allocating behaviors. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T16:54:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-94-R92724014-1.pdf: 1210258 bytes, checksum: 172d1306d2a52e97bd9af6594435896b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
謝詞----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I 中文摘要------------------------------------------------------------------------------- III 英文摘要------------------------------------------------------------------------------- V 目錄----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- VII 表次----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IX 圖次----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- X 第一章:緒論--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 第一節 研究背景與重心--------------------------------------------------------- 1 第二節 研究目的--------------------------------------------------------------- 5 第三節 研究對象--------------------------------------------------------------- 6 第四節 研究架構--------------------------------------------------------------- 7 第二章:文獻探討----------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 第一節 行銷理論之市場競爭動態觀點-------------------------------------- 10 第二節 策略理論之產業結構與廠商資源觀點-------------------------------- 20 第三節 「研發創新」與「行銷專屬」資源能力------------------------------ 30 第四節 競爭優勢之動態循環模式-------------------------------------------- 38 第五節 企業生命週期與資源配置關係-------------------------------------- 44 第六節 廠商經營效率的定義與衡量----------------------------------------- 46 第七節 相關實證研究----------------------------------------------------------- 50 第三章:研究模型----------------------------------------------------------------------- 57 第一節 資料包絡分析法簡介-------------------------------------------------- 57 第二節 資料包絡分析模式探討----------------------------------------------- 60 第三節 資料包絡分析法的優點與限制-------------------------------------- 73 第四章:實證分析----------------------------------------------------------------------- 76 第一節 投入與產出變數的定義----------------------------------------------- 76 第二節 研究變數之基本資料分析-------------------------------------------- 80 第三節 廠商經營效率與資源配置分析-------------------------------------- 83 第四節 廠商資源擴張與最適資源配置分析---------------------------------- 93 第五節 企業生命週期與資源配置分析-------------------------------------- 104 第五章:結論與建議-------------------------------------------------------------------- 111 第一節 研究結論與策略意涵-------------------------------------------------- 111 第二節 研究限制--------------------------------------------------------------- 114 第三節 對後續研究者的建議-------------------------------------------------- 116 中文參考文獻--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 118 英文參考文獻--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 120 附錄A 廠商最終消費市場接近性分類----------------------------------------------- 132 附錄B 廠商於觀察期間內之效率值------------------------------------------------- 133 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 資源配置 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 動態能力 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 資料包絡分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 經營效率 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Data Envelopment Analysis | en |
| dc.subject | business efficiency | en |
| dc.subject | resource allocation | en |
| dc.subject | dynamic capability | en |
| dc.title | 資源配置策略對廠商經營效率影響之分析-資料包絡分析法的應用 | zh_TW |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 93-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 周建亨,林婷鈴 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 經營效率,資源配置,動態能力,資料包絡分析, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | business efficiency,resource allocation,dynamic capability,Data Envelopment Analysis, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 142 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2005-06-14 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 國際企業學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-94-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.18 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
