請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/38705完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 李吉仁(Ji-Ren Lee) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tzu-Yin Yeh | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 葉姿吟 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T16:42:48Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2005-07-04 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2005-07-04 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2005-07-01 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
1. 林紹凱,民90,實質選擇權評價模式於生化製藥業之應用,國立台灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文。 2. 劉力仁,民92,生技製藥業評價適用性之研究-以台灣上市(櫃)公司為例,私立中原大學企業管理系碩士論文。 3. 羅億如,民94,生技醫藥產業,國立台灣大學國際企業學研究所教學個案。 4. 經濟部技術處,2004生物技術產業年鑑,財團法人生物技術開發中心出版,2004年。 5. 經濟部技術處,2003生物技術產業年鑑,財團法人生物技術開發中心出版,2003年。 6. 藥學雜誌,台灣的生物科技與製藥產業之面面觀,第十四卷第二期,1998年6月。 7. 經濟部工業局,2004生技產業白皮書,2005年。 8. 生技藥品及其學名藥之發展趨勢,財團法人生物技術開發中心出版,2003年。 9. Amram, M. & Kulatilaka, N.1999. Real Options: Managing Strategic Investment in an Uncertain World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press. 10. Black, E. & Scholes, M. 1973. The pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 81: 637-654. 11. Benaroch, M. & Kauffman, R.J. 1999. A case for Using Real Options Pricing Analysis to Evaluate Information Technology Project Investments. Information Systems Research, Vol.10, No.1, pp.70-86. 12. Benaroch, M. & Kauffman, R.J. 2000. Justifying Electronic Banking Network Expansion Using Real Options Analysis. MIS Quarterly, Vol.24, No.2, pp.197-225. 13. Borissiouk, O. & Peli, J. 2002. Real Option Approach to R&D Project Valuation: Case Study at Serono. Working paper, International S.A. University of Lausanne. 14. Carr, P. 1988. The Valuation of Sequential Exchange Opportunities. Journal of Finance, Vol. 43, Dec., pp.1235-1256. 15. Copeland, T. & Antikarov, V. 2001. Real Options: A Practitioner’s Guide. New York, NY: TEXERELLC. 16. Dixit, A., and Pindyck, R.S. 1995. The Options Approach to Capital Investment. Harvard Business Review, Vol.73, May-June, pp.105-115. 17. Ernst & Young,「Global Biotechnology Report 2004」 18. Ernst & Young,「Global Biotechnology Report 2003」 19. Hayes, R. and Abernathy, W. 1980. Managing Our Way to Economic Decline. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 58(4), pp.66-77. 20. Hayes, R. and Garvin, D. 1982. Managing as if Tomorrow Mattered. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 60(3), pp.71-79. 21. Kellogg, D. and Charnes, J.M. 2000. Using Real-Options Valuation Methods for a Biotechnology Firm. Working paper, The University of Kansas School of Business Lawrence, Feb. 22. Kester, W.C. 1984. Today’s Options for Tomorrow’s Growth. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 62(2), Spring, pp.153-160. 23. Longstaff, F.A. and Schwarz, E.S. 2001. Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach. The Review of Financial Studies, Vol.14, NO.1, pp.113-147. 24. Luehrman, T.A. 1998. Investment Opportunities as Real Options: Getting Started on the Numbers. Harvard Business Review, July-August, pp.51-67. 25. Margrabe, W. 1978. The Value of an Option to Exchange One Asset for Another. Journal of Finance, Vol. 33, pp.177-186. 26. McGrath, R.G. 1997. A Real Options Logic for Initiating Technology Positioning Investments. Academy of Management Review, Vol.22, No.4, pp.974-996. 27. Mitchelle, G.R. and Hamilton, W.F. 1988. Managing R&D as a Strategic Option. Research & Technology Management, May-June, pp.15-22. 28. Myers, S.C. 1977. Determinants of Corporate Borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.5, pp.147-175. 29. Nichols, N.A. 1994. Scientific Management at Merck: An Interview with CFO Judy Lewent. Harvard Business Review, Vol.72, Jan.-Feb., pp88-89. 30. Panayi, S. & Trigeorgis, L. 1998. Multi-stage Real Options: The cases of Information Technology Infrastructure and International Bank Expansion. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Vol.38, pp.675-692. 31. Perlitz, M. 1999. Real options valuation: The new frontier in R&D project evaluation? R&D Management, Vol.29, July, pp.255-269. 32. Pindyck, R.S. 1993. Investment of uncertain cost. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.34, pp.53-76. 33. Razgaitis, R. 1999. Early-Stage Technologies Valuation and Pricing. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 34. Schwarz, E.S. and Moon, M. 2000. Evaluating Research and Development Investments, in innovation, Infrastructure and Strategic Options. Oxford University Press, pp.85-106. 35. Schwarz, E.S. and Zozaya, C. 2001. Valuing Investments in information Technology as Real Options. Anderson School at UCLA. 36. Schwarz, E.S.2001. Patents and R&D as Real Options. Working paper, Anderson School at UCLA, Nov.. 37. Sharp, D.J. 1991. Uncovering the Hidden Value in High Risk Investments. Sloan Management Review, Summer, pp.69-74. 38. Trigeorgis, L. and Mason. S.P. 1987. Valuing Managerial Flexibility. Midland Corporate Finance Journal, No.1, pp.14-21. 39. Trigeorgis, L.1996. Real Options: Managerial Flexibility and Strategy in Resource Allocation. Cambridge. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/38705 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 對生技製藥產業而言,鑑價扮演相當重要的角色。許多經濟活動,包括:募資、增資、授權、拍賣,都需以技術鑑價為基礎及判斷依據。然而,由於生技製藥產業研發成本高、存在許多不確定性因素,新藥研發到上市必須投入相當的研發成本,也由於研發過程時間長,充滿高度不確定性,加上新藥開發到正式上市獲利,往往需要10-15年的時間,於這段期間決策者往往會依據該計畫的成功率、可行性、未來市場狀況,不斷調整其決策,選擇放棄或提前執行該計畫,因此,採用一般傳統評價法將無法呈現此決策彈性價值。
有鑑於此,本論文以實質選擇權法(real options approach)概念出發,並以美式選擇權作為評價模式,利用最小平方蒙地卡羅模擬法(least square Monte Carlo simulation)計算一新藥開發計畫的合理價值,除了考量財務面相關參數,本文亦考慮技術、市場環境、潛在競爭者的進入、專利權保護期限等因素,使評價模型更貼近產業實際情況,同時以實質選擇權法與一般傳統淨現值法評價此計畫價值,結果證明以實質選擇權評價生技製藥產業較一般傳統淨現值法適切。 最後,藉由參數的敏感度分析找出影響實質選擇權價值的重要變數,由敏感度分析的結果來看,期初期望投資完成成本K、期初預估現金流量C、現金流量不確定性ψ、對手進入市場的機率λ、對手進入市場現金流量乘數ω、現金流量趨勢項α以及專利權保護期限T,都是相對關鍵的參數,與生技製藥產業產業特性不謀而合,證明評價過程除了財務面變數外,產業的競合、策略互動必須納入模型考量使得評價結果更切合實際。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In the biotech pharmaceutical industry, evaluation plays a vital role in various stages of a product life cycle, from initial fund raising, seasoned equity offering, authorization, to the auctioning of patents, which must be based on appropriate evaluation tools. However, as drug discovery normally incurs high R&D costs and involves high uncertainty from various sources, the invested company shall have a certain degree of decision flexibility to adjust their strategies, even abandon the project during investing period. Therefore, an adequate evaluation approach shall reflect this kind of decision nature and flexibility. Unfortunately, the traditional net present value approach cannot satisfy such an evaluation need.
The purpose of the present research is to apply the real options approach to the case of biopharmaceutical evaluation. We adopt American option method to evaluate a new drug development project and use the Least Squares Monte Carlo Simulation to price the options. In addition to financial parameters, we also consider some industry-level parameters, including technological uncertainty, industry dynamics, potential new entrants, patent term, which significantly influences the project value. Our result shows that by incorporating these factors our model shows a higher degree of robustness than the net present value method. According to the results of sensitivity analyses, we further find that parameters of initial expected cost (K), initial expected cash flow (C),uncertainty in the cash flow (φ), the probability of new entrants (λ), the effect of cash flow of new entrants (ω), the draft (α)(economic growth rate), patent term (T) are critical to the valuation. These key parameters are highly relevant to the valuation in biopharmaceutical industry. In short, our research indicates that in addition to financial parameters effective evaluation models shall take strategic interaction and industry uncertainty into their considerations. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T16:42:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-94-R92724009-1.pdf: 649703 bytes, checksum: 9bc2ca6bf3a230c3d8f00bf3ac3a10db (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要...........................................................Ⅰ
英文摘要...........................................................Ⅱ 目錄...............................................................Ⅲ 表目錄............................................................ Ⅵ 圖目錄.............................................................Ⅴ 第一章 緒論........................................................1 第一節 研究動機................................................1 第二節 研究問題與目的..........................................2 第三節 論文章節架構............................................3 第二章 生技產業概述與現況分析......................................5 第一節 全球生技產業結構........................................5 第二節 我國生技產業現況與結構分析.............................11 第三節 生技製藥產業之產業特性.................................18 第三章 文獻探討...................................................24 第一節 實質選擇權.............................................24 第二節 無形資產評價理論與查核要點.............................30 第四章 研究方法...................................................34 第一節 模型介紹...............................................34 第二節 研究過程...............................................35 第五章 研究結果...................................................41 第一節 模擬參數的設定.........................................41 第二節 模擬結果與敏感度分析...................................45 第六章 結論與建議.................................................58 第一節 研究結果與限制.........................................58 第二節 未來研究建議...........................................60 參考文獻...........................................................62 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 實質選擇權 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 最小平方蒙地卡羅模擬法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 生技製藥產業 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Least Squares Monte Carlo Simulation (LSM) | en |
| dc.subject | biotech pharmaceutical industry | en |
| dc.subject | Real Options | en |
| dc.title | 生技製藥產業鑑價模式之研究:實質選擇權之應用 | zh_TW |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 93-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 湯明哲(Ming-Je Tang),陳明賢(Ming-Shen Chen) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 實質選擇權,生技製藥產業,最小平方蒙地卡羅模擬法, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Real Options,biotech pharmaceutical industry,Least Squares Monte Carlo Simulation (LSM), | en |
| dc.relation.page | 64 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2005-07-01 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 國際企業學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-94-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 634.48 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
