請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/3869
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 趙淑妙(Shu-Miaw Chaw) | |
dc.contributor.author | Chih-Yao Hsu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 許智堯 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-13T08:37:47Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-08-02 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-13T08:37:47Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2016-08-02 | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016-07-25 | |
dc.identifier.citation | REFERENCS
Alkatib S, Fleischmann TT, Scharff LB, Bock R. 2012. Evolutionary constraints on the plastid tRNA set decoding methionine and isoleucine. Nucleic Acids Research 40:6713–6724. Allen JF. 2003. Why chloroplasts and mitochondria contain genomes. Comparative and Functional Genomics 4:31–36. Allison LA. 2000. The role of sigma factors in plastid transcription. Biochimie 82:537–548. Allison LA, Simon LD, Maliga P. 1996. Deletion of rpoB reveals a second distinct transcription system in plastids of higher plants. The EMBO Journal 15:2802–2809. Archibald, JM. 2009. The puzzle of plastid evolution. Current Biology: CB. 19:R81–88. Baba K, Schmidt J, Espinosa-Ruiz A, Villarejo A, Shiina T, Gardeström P, Sane AP, Bhalerao RP. (2004). Organellar gene transcription and early seedling development are affected in the rpoT; 2 mutant of Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal 38:38–48. Barkan A. 1988. Proteins encoded by a complex chloroplast transcription unit are each translated from both monocistronic and polycistronic mRNAs. The EMBO Journal 7:2637–2644. Bergthorsson U, Adams KL, Thomason B, Palmer JD. 2003. Widespread horizontal transfer of mitochondrial genes in flowering plants. Nature 424:197–201. Birky CW. 1995. Uniparental inheritance of mitochondrial and chloroplast genes: mechanisms and evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 92:11331–11338. Blazier JC, Guisinger MM, Jansen RK. 2011. Recent loss of plastid-encoded ndh genes within Erodium (Geraniaceae). Plant Molecular Biology 76:263–272. Bligny M, et al. 2000. Regulation of plastid rDNA transcription by interaction of CDF2 with two different RNA polymerases. The EMBO Journal 19:1851–1860. Bourque G, Pevzner PA. 2002. Genome-scale evolution: reconstructing gene orders in the ancestral species. Genome Research 12:26–36. Börner T, Aleynikova AY, Zubo YO, Kusnetsov VV. 2015. Chloroplast RNA polymerases: role in chloroplast biogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1847:761–769. Bryant, DA, Frigaard, NU. 2006. Prokaryotic photosynthesis and phototrophy illuminated. Trends in Microbiology 14:488–496. Buschiazzo E, Ritland C, Bohlmann J, Ritland K. 2012. Slow but not low: genomic comparisons reveal slower evolutionary rate and higher dN/dS in conifers compared to angiosperms. BMC Evolionary Biology 12:8. Cai Z, et al. 2008. Extensive reorganization of the plastid genome of Trifolium subterraneum (Fabaceae) is associated with numerous repeated sequences and novel DNA insertions. Journal of Molecular Evolution 67:696–704. Chaw SM, Parkinson CL, Cheng Y, Vincent TM, Palmer JD. 2000. Seed plant phylogeny inferred from all three plant genomes: monophyly of extant gymnosperms and origin of Gnetales from conifers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97:4086–4091. Chaw SM, Chang CC, Chen HL, Li WH. 2004. Dating the monocot-dicot divergence and the origin of core eudicots using whole chloroplast genomes. Journal of Molecular Evolution 58:1–18. Cheng Y, Nicolson RG, Tripp K, Chaw SM. 2000. Phylogeny of Taxaceae and Cephalotaxaceae genera inferred from chloroplast matK gene and nuclear rDNA ITS region. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 14:353–365. Conway S. 2013. Beyond pine cones: an introduction to gymnosperms. Arnoldia 70/4. Corriveau JL, Coleman AW. 1988. Rapid screening method to detect potential biparental inheritance of plastid DNA and results for over 200 angiosperm species. American Journal of Botany 1443–1458. Cosner ME. 1993. Phylogenetic and molecular evolutionary studies of chloroplast DNA variation in the Campanulaceae. PhD thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus. Cosner ME, Raubeson LA, Jansen RK. 2004. Chloroplast DNA rearrangements in Campanulaceae: phylogenetic utility of highly rearranged genomes. BMC Evolutionary Biology 4:27. Crisp MD, Cook LG. 2011. Cenozoic extinctions account for the low diversity of extant gymnosperms compared with angiosperms. New Phytologist 192:997–1009. Cui L, Leebens-Mack J, Wang LS, Tang J, Rymarquis L, Stern DB. 2006. Adaptive evolution of chloroplast genome structure inferred using a parametric bootstrap approach. BMC Evolutionary Biology 6:13. Darling AC, Mau B, Blattner FR, Perna NT. 2004. Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Research 14:1394–403. Darling AE, Mau B, Perna NT. 2010. progressiveMauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS One 5:e11147. de Laubenfels, David J. 1988. Coniferales. Flora Malesiana, Series I, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic 10:337–453. de Vries J, Stanton A, Archibald JM, Gould SB. 2016. Streptophyte terrestrialization in light of plastid evolution. Trends in Plant Science 21:467–476. Deusch O, Landan G, Roettger M, et al. 2008. Genes of cyanobacterial origin in plant nuclear genomes point to a heterocyst-forming plastid ancestor. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25:748–761. Downie SR, Palmer JD. 1992. Use of chloroplast DNA rearrangements in reconstructing plant phylogeny. In Molecular systematics of plants. Springer US. 14–35. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL, Palmer JD. 1995. Multiple independent losses of two genes and one intron from legume chloroplast genomes. Systematic Botany 272–294. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL, Ballenger JA, Palmer JD. 1996. The distribution and phylogenetic significance of a 50-kb chloroplast DNA inversion in the flowering plant family Leguminosae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 5:429–438. Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32:1792–1797. Finster S, Eggert E, Zoschke R, Weihe A, Schmitz-Linneweber C. 2013. Light-dependent, plastome-wide association of the plastid-encoded RNA polymerase with chloroplast DNA. The Plant Journal 76:849–860. Frazer KA, Pachter L, Poliakov A, Rubin EM, Dubchak I. 2004. VISTA: computational tools for comparative genomics. Nucleic Acids Research 32:W273–279 Gantt JS, Baldauf SL, Calie PJ, Weeden NF, Palmer JD. 1991. Transfer of rpl22 to the nucleus greatly preceded its loss from the chloroplast and involved the gain of an intron. The EMBO Journal 10:3073–3078. Graur D, Li WH. 2000. Fundamentals of Molecular Evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA. Gray MW, Lang BF. 1998. Transcription in chloroplasts and mitochondria: a tale of two polymerases. Trends Microbiol 6:1–3 Guisinger MM, Kuehl JV, Boore JL, Jansen RK. 2008. Genome-wide analyses of Geraniaceae plastid DNA reveal unprecedented patterns of increased nucleotide substitutions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105:18424–18429. Guisinger MM, Kuehl JV, Boore JL, Jansen RK. 2011. Extreme reconfiguration of plastid genomes in the angiosperm family Geraniaceae: rearrangements, repeats, and codon usage. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28:583–600. Guo W, et al. 2014. Predominant and substoichiometric isomers of the plastid genome coexist within Juniperus plants and have shifted multiple times during cupressophyte evolution. Genome Biology and Evolution 6:580–590. Gymnosperms on The Plant List. http://www.theplantlist.org/browse/G/. Retrieved 2016/5/12. Haberle RC, Fourcade HM, Boore JL, Jansen RK. 2008. Extensive rearrangements in the chloroplast genome of Trachelium caeruleum are associated with repeats and tRNA genes. Journal of Molecular Evolution 66:350–361 Hajdukiewicz PT, Allison LA, Maliga P. 1997. The two RNA polymerases encoded by the nuclear and the plastid compartments transcribe distinct groups of genes in tobacco plastids. The EMBO Journal 16:4041–4048. Hanaoka M, Kanamaru K, Takahashi H, Tanaka K. 2003. Molecular genetic analysis of chloroplast gene promoters dependent on SIG2, a nucleus‐encoded sigma factor for the plastid‐encoded RNA polymerase, in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nucleic Acids Research 31:7090–7098. Hansen AK, Escobar LK, Gilbert LE, Jansen RK. 2007. Paternal, maternal, and biparental inheritance of the chloroplast genome in Passiflora (Passifloraceae): implications for phylogenetic studies. American Journal of Botany 94:42–46. Hazkani-Covo E, Zeller RM, Martin W. 2010. Molecular poltergeists: mitochondrial DNA copies (numts) in sequenced nuclear genomes. PLoS Genetics 6:e1000834. Hedtke B, Börner T, Weihe A. 1997. Mitochondrial and chloroplast phage-type RNA polymerases in Arabidopsis. Science 277:809–811. Hedtke B, Börner T, Weihe A. 2000. One RNA polymerase serving two genomes. EMBO Reports 1:435–440. Hirao T, Watanabe A, Kurita M, Kondo T, Takata K. 2008. Complete nucleotide sequence of the Cryptomeria japonica D. Don. chloroplast genome and comparative chloroplast genomics: diversified genomic structure of coniferous species. BMC Plant Biology 8:70. Hsu CY, Wu CS, Chaw SM. 2014. Ancient nuclear plastid DNA in the yew family (Taxaceae). Genome Biology and Evolution 6:2111–2121. Huang CY, Grünheit N, Ahmadinejad N, Timmis JN, Martin W. 2005. Mutational decay and age of chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes transferred recently to angiosperm nuclear chromosomes. Plant Physiology 138:1723–1733. Hu Y, Zhang Q, Rao G. 2008. Occurrence of plastids in the sperm cells of Caprifoliaceae: biparental plastid inheritance in angiosperms is unilaterally derived from maternal inheritance. Plant and Cell Physiology 49:958–968. Hu J, Bogorad L. 1990. Maize chloroplast RNA polymerase: the 180-, 120-, and 38-kilodalton polypeptides are encoded in chloroplast genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 87:1531–1535. Hudson GS, Holton TA, Whitfeld PR, Bottomley W. 1988. Spinach chloroplast rpoBC genes encode three subunits of the chloroplast RNA polymerase. Journal of Molecular Biology 200:639–654. Igloi GL, Kössel H. 1992. The transcriptional apparatus of chloroplasts. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences10:525–558. Ishihama A. 2000. Functional modulation of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. Annual Reviews in Microbiology 54: 499–518. Ishizaki Y, Tsunoyama Y, Hatano K, Ando K, Kato K, Shinmyo A, Kobori M, Takeba G, Nakahira Y, Shiina T. 2005. A nuclear‐encoded sigma factor, Arabidopsis SIG6, recognizes sigma‐70 type chloroplast promoters and regulates early chloroplast development in cotyledons. The Plant Journal 42:133–144. Jansen RK, Cai Z, Raubeson LA, Daniell H, Leebens-Mack J, Müller KF, Lee SB. 2007. Analysis of 81 genes from 64 plastid genomes resolves relationships in angiosperms and identifies genome-scale evolutionary patterns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104:19369–19374. Jansen RK, Ruhlman TA. 2012. Plastid genomes of seed plants. In: Bock R, Knoop V, editors. Genomics of Chloroplasts and Mitochondria. Netherlands : Springer 103–126. Jiang ZK, Wang YD, Zheng SL, Zhang W, Tian N. 2012. Occurrence of Sciadopitys-like fossil wood (Conifer) in the Jurassic of western Liaoning and its evolutionary implications. Chinese Science Bulletin 57:569–572 Kapoor S, Sugiura M. 1999. Identification of two essential sequence elements in the nonconsensus type II PatpB-290 plastid promoter by using plastid transcription extracts from cultured tobacco BY-2 cells. Plant Cell 11:1799–1810. Kapoor S, Suzuki JY, Sugiura M. 1997. Identification and functional significance of a new class of non‐consensus‐type plastid promoters. The Plant Journal 11:327–337. Kanamaru K, Nagashima A, Fujiwara M, Shimada H, Shirano Y, Nakabayashi K, Shibata S, Tanaka K, Takahashi H. 2001. An Arabidopsis sigma factor (SIG2)-dependent expression of plastid-encoded tRNAs in chloroplasts. Plant and Cell Physiology 42:1034–1043. Kleine T, Maier UG, Leister D. 2009. DNA transfer from organelles to the nucleus: the idiosyncratic genetics of endosymbiosis. Annual Review of Plant Biology 60:115–138. Kobayashi Y, Dokiya Y, Sugita M. 2001. Dual targeting of phage-type RNA polymerase to both mitochondria and plastids is due to alternative translation initiation in single transcripts. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 289:1106–1113. Kolosova N, et al. 2004. Isolation of high-quality RNA from gymnosperm and angiosperm trees. Biotechniques 36:821–824. Krzywinski M, et al. 2009. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Research 19:1639–1645. Ku C, et al. 2015. Endosymbiotic origin and differential loss of eukaryotic genes. Nature 524:427–432. Legen J, et al. 2002. Comparative analysis of plastid transcription profiles of entire plastid chromosomes from tobacco attributed to wild‐type and PEP‐deficient transcription machineries. The Plant Journal 31:171–188. Leister D. 2005. Origin, evolution and genetic effects of nuclear insertions of organelle DNA. TRENDS in Genetics 21:655–663. Leslie AB, Beaulieu JM, Rai HS, Crane PR, Donoghue MJ, Mathews S. 2012. Hemisphere-scale differences in conifer evolutionary dynamics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109:16217–16221. Librado P, Rozas J. 2009. DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25: 1451–1452. Li J, et al. 2016. Evolution of short inverted repeat in cupressophytes, transfer of accD to nucleus in Sciadopitys verticillata and phylogenetic position of Sciadopityaceae. Scientific Reports 6:20934. Liere K, Börner T. 2007. Transcription and transcriptional regulation in plastids. In Cell and molecular biology of plastids. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 121–174. Liere K, Maliga P. 2001. Plastid RNA polymerases in higher plants. In Regulation of photosynthesis. Springer Netherlands 29–49. Liere K, Börner T. 2007. Transcription and transcriptional regulation in plastids. In Cell and molecular biology of plastids. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 121–174. Lin CP, Huang JP, Wu CS, Hsu CY, Chaw SM. 2010. Comparative chloroplast genomics reveals the evolution of Pinaceae genera and subfamilies. Genome Biology and Evolution 2:504–517. Lloyd AH, Timmis JN. 2011. The origin and characterization of new nuclear genes originating from a cytoplasmic organellar genome. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28:2019–2028. Magee AM. et al. 2010. Localized hypermutation and associated gene losses in legume chloroplast genomes. Genome Research 20:1700–1710. Mao K. 2012. Distribution of living Cupressaceae reflects the breakup of Pangea. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109:7793–7798. Maréchal A, Brisson N. 2010. Recombination and the maintenance of plant organelle genome stability. New Phytologist 186:299–317. Martin W, Stoebe B, Goremykin V, Hansmann S, Hasegawa M, Kowallik, K.V. 1998. Gene transfer to the nucleus and the evolution of chloroplasts. Nature 393:162–165. Martin W, Rujan T, Richly E, Hansen A, Cornelsen S, Lins T, Leister D, Stoebe B, Hasegawa M, Penny D.. 2002. Evolutionary analysis of Arabidopsis, cyanobacterial, and chloroplast genomes reveals plastid phylogeny and thousands of cyanobacterial genes in the nucleus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99:12246–12251. Meierhoff K, Felder S, Nakamura T, Bechtold N, Schuster G. 2003. HCF152, an Arabidopsis RNA binding pentatricopeptide repeat protein involved in the processing of chloroplast psbB-psbT-psbH-petB-petD RNAs. The Plant Cell 15:1480–1495. Michalovova M, Vyskot B, Kejnovsky E. 2013. Analysis of plastid and mitochondrial DNA insertions in the nucleus (NUPTs and NUMTs) of six plant species: size, relative age and chromosomal localization. Heredity 111:314–320. Milligan BG, Hampton JN, Palmer JD. 1989. Dispersed repeats and structural reorganization in subclover chloroplast DNA. Molecular Biology and Evolution 6:355–368. Mochizuki N, Tanaka R, Tanaka A, Masuda T, Nagatani A. 2008. The steady-state level of Mgprotoporphyrin IX is not a determinant of plastid-to-nucleus signaling in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105:15184–89. Mogensen HL. 1996. The hows and whys of cytoplasmic inheritance in seed plants. American Journal of Botany 83:383–404. Moran NA. 1996. Accelerated evolution and Muller's rachet in endosymbiotic bacteria. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93:2873–2878. Morden CW, Wolfe KH. 1991. Plastid translation and transcription genes in a non-photosynthetic plant: intact, missing and pseudo genes. The EMBO Journal 10:3281. Muller HJ. 1932. Some genetic aspects of sex. The American Naturalist 66:118–138. Muller HJ. 1964. The relation of recombination to mutational advance. Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis 1:2–9. Noutsos C, Kleine T, Armbruster U, DalCorso G, Leister D. 2007. Nuclear insertions of organellar DNA can create novel patches of functional exon sequences. Trends in Genetics 23:597–601. Noutsos C, Richly E, Leister D. 2005. Generation and evolutionary fate of insertions of organelle DNA in the nuclear genomes of flowering plants. Genome Research 15:616–628. Ohba K, Iwakawa M, Okada Y, Murai M. 1971. Paternal transmission of a plastid anomaly in some reciprocal crosses of Sugi, Cryptomeria japonica D. Don. Silvae Genet. 20:101–107. Ohyama K, et al. 1986. Chloroplast gene organization deduced from complete sequence of liverwort Marchantia polymorpha chloroplast DNA. Nature 322:572–574. Ortelt J, Link, G. 2014. Plastid gene transcription: promoters and RNA polymerases. Chloroplast Biotechnology: Methods and Protocols 47–72. Palmer JD, Thompson WF. 1981. Rearrangements in the chloroplast genomes of mung bean and pea. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 78:5533–5537. Palmer JD. 1983. Chloroplast DNA exists in two orientations. Nature 301, 92–93. Palmer JD. 1985. Comparative organization of chloroplast genomes. Annual Review of Genetics 19:325–354. Palmer JD. 1991. Plastid chromosomes: structure and evolution. The Molecular Biology of Plastids 7:5–53. Perry AS, Brennan S, Murphy DJ, Kavanagh TA, Wolfe KH. 2002. Evolutionary re-organisation of a large operon in adzuki bean chloroplast DNA caused by inverted repeat movement. DNA Research 9:157–162. Quesada-Vargas T, Ruiz ON, Daniell H. 2005. Characterization of heterologous multigene operons in transgenic chloroplasts. Transcription, processing, and translation. Plant Physiology 138:1746–1762. Pfannschmidt T, Nilsson A, Tullberg A, Link G, Allen JF. 1999. Direct transcriptional control of the chloroplast genes psbA and psaAB adjusts photosynthesis to light energy distribution in plants. IUBMB Life 48:271–276. Pfannschmidt T, Nilsson A, Allen JF. 1999. Photosynthetic control of chloroplast gene expression. Nature 397:625–628. Privat I, Hakimi MA, Buhot L, Favory JJ. Lerbs-Mache S. 2003. Characterization of Arabidopsisplastid sigma-like transcription factors SIG1, SIG2 and SIG3. Plant Molecular Biology 51:385–399. Rai HS, Reeves PA, Peakall R, Olmstead RG, Graham SW. 2008. Inference of higher-order conifer relationships from a multi-locus plastid data set. Botany 86: 658–669. Raubeson LA, Jansen RK. 1992. A rare chloroplast DNA structure mutation is shared by all conifers. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 20:17–24. Richly E, Leister D. 2004. NUPTs in sequenced eukaryotes and their genomic organization in relation to NUMTs. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21:1972–1980. Rice DW, Alverson AJ, Richardson AO, et al. 2013. Horizontal transfer of entire genomes via mitochondrial fusion in the angiosperm Amborella. Science 342:1468–1473. Rousseau-Gueutin M, Ayliffe MA, Timmis JN. 2011. Conservation of plastid sequences in the plant nuclear genome for millions of years facilitates endosymbiotic evolution. Plant Physiology 157:2181–2193. Sakai A, Saito C, Inada N, Kuroiwa T. 1998. Transcriptional activities of the chloroplast-nuclei and proplastid-nuclei isolated from tobacco exhibit different sensitivities to tagetitoxin: implication of the presence of distinct RNA polymerases. Plant and Cell Physiology 39:928–934. Schattner P, Brooks AN, Lowe TM. 2005. The tRNAscan-SE, snoscan and snoGPS web servers for the detection of tRNAs and snoRNAs. Nucleic Acids Research 33(Web Server issue):W686–689. Seong D, Offner S. 2013. A phylogenetic study of conifers describes their evolutionary relationships and reveals potential explanations for current distribution patterns. J. Emerg. Invest.. http://www. emerginginvestigators. org/2013/10. Sexton TB, Christopher DA, Mullet JE. 1990. Light-induced switch in barley psbD-psbC promoter utilization: a novel mechanism regulating chloroplast gene expression. The EMBO Journal 9:4485. Sheppard AE, Ayliffe MA, Blatch L, et al. 2008. Transfer of plastid DNA to the nucleus is elevated during male gametogenesis in tobacco. Plant Physiology 148:328–336. Sheppard AE, Timmis JN. 2009. Instability of plastid DNA in the nuclear genome. PLoS Genetics 5:e1000323. Shirano Y, Shimada H, Kanamaru K, Fujiwara M, Tanaka K, Takahashi H, Unno K, Sato S, Tabata S, Hayashi H, Miyake C, Yokota A, Shibata D. 2000. Chloroplast development in Arabidopsis thaliana requires the nuclear-encoded transcription factor sigma B. FEBS letters 485:178–182. Stewart CN Jr, Via LE. 1993. A rapid CTAB DNA isolation technique useful for RAPD fingerprinting and other PCR applications. Biotechniques 14:748–750. Stern DB, Goldschmidt-Clermont M, Hanson MR. 2010. Chloroplast RNA metabolism. Annual Review of Plant Biology 61:125–155. Stine M, Sears BB, Keathley DE. 1989. Inheritance of plastids in interspecific hybrids of blue spruce and white spruce. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 78:768–774. Shiina T, Tsunoyama Y, Nakahira Y, Khan MS. 2005. Plastid RNA polymerases, promoters, and transcription regulators in higher plants. International Review of Cytology 244:1–68. Sugiura M. 1992. The chloroplast genome. Plant Molecular Biology 19:149–168. Szmidt AE, Aldén T, Hällgren JE. 1987. Paternal inheritance of chloroplast DNA in Larix. Plant Molecular Biology 9:59–64. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. 2011. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28:2731–2739. Temnykh S, DeClerck G, Lukashova A, Lipovich L, Cartinhour S, McCouch S. 2001. Computational and experimental analysis of microsatellites in rice (Oryza sativa L.): frequency, length variation, transposon associations, and genetic marker potential. Genome Research 11:1441–1452. Testolin R, Cipriani G. 1997. Paternal inheritance of chloroplast DNA and maternal inheritance of mitochondrial DNA in the genus Actinidia. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 94:897–903. Timmis JN, Ayliffe MA, Huang CY, Martin W. 2004. Endosymbiotic gene transfer: organelle genomes forge eukaryotic chromosomes. Nat Rev Genet. 5:123–135. Timmis JN, Scott NS. 1983. Sequence homology between spinach nuclear and chloroplast genomes. Nature 305:65–67. Tsunoyama Y, Ishizaki Y, Morikawa K, Kobori M, Nakahira Y, Takeba G, Toyoshima Y, Shiina, T. 2004. Blue light-induced transcription of plastid-encoded psbD gene is mediated by a nuclear-encoded transcription initiation factor, AtSig5. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101:3304–3309. Tsumura Y, Suyama Y, Yoshimura K. 2000. Chloroplast DNA inversion polymorphism in populations of Abies and Tsuga. Molecular Biology and Evolution 17:1302–1312. Vieira Ldo N, et al. 2014. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Podocarpus lambertii: genome structure, evolutionary aspects, gene content and SSR detection. PLoS One 9:e90618. Wang D, Wu YW, Shih AC, Wu CS, Wang YN, Chaw SM. 2007. Transfer of chloroplast genomic DNA to mitochondrial genome occurred at least 300 MYA. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24:2040–2048. Wang XQ, Ran JH. 2014. Evolution and biogeography of gymnosperms. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 75C:24–40. Weng ML, Blazier JC, Govindu M, Jansen RK. 2013. Reconstruction of the ancestral plastid genome in Geraniaceae reveals a correlation between genome rearrangements, repeats and nucleotide substitution rates. Molecular Biology and Evolution 31:645–659. Wicke S, Schneeweiss GM, dePamphilis CW, Müller KF, Quandt D. 2011. The evolution of the plastid chromosome in land plants: gene content, gene order, gene function. Plant Molecular Biology 76:273–297. Wise RR, Hoober JK. 2006. The structure and function of plastids. Springer Science Business Media. Wolfe KH, Li WH, Sharp PM. 1987. Rates of nucleotide substitution vary greatly among plant mitochondrial, chloroplast, and nuclear DNAs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 84:9054–9058. Wojciechowski MF, Lavin M, Sanderson MJ. 2004. A phylogeny of legumes (Leguminosae) based on analysis of the plastid matK gene resolves many well-supported subclades within the family. American Journal of Botany 91:1846–1862. Wu CS, Chaw SM, Huang YY. 2013. Chloroplast phylogenomics indicates that Ginkgo biloba is sister to cycads. Genome Biology and Evolution 5:243–254. Wu CS, Chaw SM. 2014. Highly rearranged and size-variable chloroplast genomes in conifers II clade (cupressophytes): evolution towards shorter intergenic spacers. Plant Biotechnology Journal 12:344–353. Wu CS, Chaw, SM. 2015. Evolutionary stasis in cycad plastomes and the first case of plastome GC-biased gene conversion. Genome Biology and Evolution 7:2000–2009. Wu CS, Lin CP, Hsu CY, Wang RJ, Chaw SM. 2011. Comparative chloroplast genomes of Pinaceae: insights into the mechanism of diversified genomic organizations. Genome Biology and Evolution 3:309–319. Wu CS, Wang YN, Hsu CY, Lin CP, Chaw SM. 2011. Loss of different inverted repeat copies from the chloroplast genomes of Pinaceae and cupressophytes and influence of heterotachy on the evaluation of gymnosperm phylogeny. Genome Biology and Evolution 3:1284–1295. Wu CS, Wang YN, Liu SM, Chaw SM. 2007. Chloroplast genome (cpDNA) of Cycas taitungensis and 56 cp protein-coding genes of Gnetum parvifolium: insights into cpDNA evolution and phylogeny of extant seed plants. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24:1366–1379. Wyman SK, Jansen RK, Boore JL. 2004. Automatic annotation of organellar genomes with DOGMA. Bioinformatics 20:3252–3255. Yap JY, et al. 2015. Complete chloroplast genome of the wollemi pine (Wollemia nobilis): structure and evolution. PLoS One 10:e0128126. Yi X, Gao L, Wang B, Su YJ, Wang T. 2013. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Cephalotaxus oliveri (Cephalotaxaceae): evolutionary comparison of Cephalotaxus chloroplast DNAs and insights into the loss of inverted repeat copies in gymnosperms. Genome Biology and Evolution 5:688–698. Yoshida T, Furihata HY, Kawabe A. 2014. Patterns of genomic integration of nuclear chloroplast DNA fragments in plant species. DNA Research 21:127–140. Young DA, Allen RL, Harvey AJ, Lonsdale DM. 1998. Characterization of a gene encoding a single-subunit bacteriophage-type RNA polymerase from maize which is alternatively spliced. Molecular and General Genetics MGG 260:30–37. Zhang Q, Liu Y 2003. Examination of the cytoplasmic DNA in male reproductive cells to determine the potential for cytoplasmic inheritance in 295 angiosperm species. Plant and Cell Physiology 44:941–951. Zhang Y, Ma J, Yang B, et al. 2014. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Taxus chinensis var. mairei (Taxaceae): loss of an inverted repeat region and comparative analysis with related species. Gene 540:201–209. Zhelyazkova P, et al. 2012. The primary transcriptome of barley chloroplasts: numerous noncoding RNAs and the dominating role of the plastid-encoded RNA polymerase. The Plant Cell 24:123-136. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/3869 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 針葉樹植物 (conifers)分為松科 (Pinaceae) 與柏門 (Cupressophyta) 兩大群,其中以柏門植物最具多樣性及高經濟價值。現生的柏門植物又分為五個科,共約有400多種。種子植物 (seed plants) 色質體基因組 (plastomes)結構相當保守,但柏門植物的色質體基因組結構卻有高度的變異性。為了更深入的探討色質體基因組重組在演化上的意義與影響,本論文利用比較色質體基因體學的方法研究以下兩個題目。
第一,提出新的方法篩選及研究紅豆杉科植物核質體DNA (nuclear plastid DNA or nupt)。核質體DNA是一群由色質體基因組轉移到核基因組中的DNA片段。核質體DNA的移轉為核基因組提供了豐富的遺傳資源,也提高了核基因組的遺傳多樣性。但目前為止,沒有針葉樹植物核質體DNA的相關研究,因此本研究定序了台灣穗花杉 (Amentotaxus formosana) 及台灣紅豆杉 (Taxus mairei) 的完整色質體基因組,並利用比較基因體學的方法分析穗花杉、紅豆杉及粗榧屬的色質體基因組排列方式,進而推測出紅豆杉科植物祖先色質體基因組的組成與排列方式。由此,我們設計專一性的引子來增幅祖先型及現生紅豆杉科植物色質體基因組的非共線型區域 (non-syntenic region)。利用這方法我們一共篩選出12.6 kb的核質體DNA,這些核質體DNA明顯地累積較多GC變成AT的突變。此外,藉由比較祖先型核質體DNA與現生核質體DNA的rps8基因,我們發現現生核質體DNA的rps8基因轉譯起始碼子包含了一個C變成U的RNA修飾。我們的研究進一步的指出紅豆杉科植物的色質體基因組大約在白堊紀就已經轉移到核基因組中,這些核質體DNA不僅保留了祖先型色質體基因組排列方式與核酸組成,也提供了線索,讓我們可以瞭解與研究針葉樹色質體基因組的演化過程。 第二,利用實驗的方法驗證與探討色質體基因組序列重組對於傘松科植物演化上的意義與影響。種子植物的色質體基因轉錄時大多是以操縱組 (operon) 的模式進行,也就是多個基因同時轉錄 (polycistronic transcription); 種子植物的色質體基因組操縱組相當保守,即使像針葉樹的色質體基因組排列方式經過多次的重組,但它們的操縱組也很少遭到破壞。本研究定序了完整的傘松(Sciadopitys verticillata)色質體基因組。傘松科植物目前僅存一種,基因體比較分析後發現傘松的色質體基因組有三項特點: 色質體基因組排列經過多次的重組、包含了三組連續並退化的tRNA基因 (trnV-GAC, trnQ-UUG及trnP-GGG )、有一個特殊的反向重複序列 (inverted repeat),而這個反向重複序列可形成不同構型 (isomeric) 的色質體基因組。此外,傘松的色質體基因組因重組打斷了多個原本的操縱組,而這些斷裂的操縱組卻重新組合而形成四個重組基因群 (chimeric gene clusters)。我們的數據顯示這些新的重組基因群保留有原本的啟動子(promoter) ,且可以順利地轉錄出其相對應的RNA序列。本研究結果使我們能更深入的了解為何針葉樹植物色質體基因組具有多樣性及高複雜度的特性。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Cupressophytes (Cupressophyta or conifers II) is the largest of the two conifer groups, the other being Pinaceae. Cupressophytes comprise about 400 species in five families. They are the most diversified and economically valuable group in conifers. Our previous studies showed that gene organizations of their plastid genomes (plastomes) are highly variable among the few elucidated plastomes of cupressophytes. To further decipher the evolution of plastomic re-organization, I carried out comparative plastome studies of two cupressophytes families; Taxaceae and Sciadopityaceae.
Here we reported two major findings. First, I proposed a new strategy for identification and evolutionary studies of nuclear plastid DNAs (nupts) in Taxaceae. Plastid-to-nucleus DNA transfer provides a rich genetic resource to the complexity of plant nuclear genome architecture. To date, the evolutionary fates of nupt remain unknown in conifers. We have sequenced the complete plastomes of two yews, Amentotaxus formosana and Taxus mairei. Comparative plastomic analyses revealed possible evolutionary scenarios for plastomic reorganization from ancestral to extant plastomes in the three sampled Taxaceae genera, Amentotaxus, Cephalotaxus, and Taxus. Specific primers were designed to amplify non-syntenic regions between ancestral and extant plastomes, and 12.6 kb of nupts were identified based on phylogenetic analyses. These nupts have significantly accumulated GC-to-AT mutations, suggesting a nuclear mutational environment shaped by spontaneous deamination of 5-methylcytosin. The ancestral initial codon of rps8 is retained in the Taxus nupts, but its corresponding extant codon is mutated and requires C-to-U RNA-editing. These findings suggest that nupts can help recover scenarios of the nucleotide mutation process. We also demonstrated that the Taxaceae nupts we retrieved may have been retained since the Cretaceous period of Mesozoic Era and they carry the information of both ancestral genomic organization and nucleotide composition, which offer clues for understanding the plastome evolution in conifers. Second, we used experimental data to show the evolutionary impact of plastomic rearrangements in Sciadopityaceae. Many genes in the plastid genomes of seed plants are organized in polycistronic transcription units known as operons. These plastid operons are highly conserved, even among conifers whose plastomes are highly rearranged. We sequenced the complete plastome sequence of Sciadopitys verticillata (Japanese umbrella pine), the sole member of Sciadopityaceae. The Sciadopitys plastome is characterized by extensive inversions, pseudogenization of tRNA genes after tandem duplications, and a unique pair of inverted repeats involved in the formation of isomeric plastomes. We showed that plastomic inversions in Sciadopitys have led to the shuffling of remote operons, resulting in the birth of four chimeric gene clusters. Our data also suggested that these chimeric gene clusters have adopted pre-existing promoters for the transcription of genes. This newly deciphered plastome of Sciadopitys advances our current understanding of how the conifer plastomes have evolved toward increased diversity and complexity. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-13T08:37:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-D00b48013-1.pdf: 9337427 bytes, checksum: fd58dd099ffe4e7dd7204c375cb5572c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | TABLE OF CONTENTS
中文摘要 I ABSTRACT III CHAPTER 1. Background and Significance 1 1.1 General Characters of Plastids and Plastomes 1 1.2 Plastomic Organization 2 1.3 Plastomic Rearrangements 3 1.4 Transcription of Plastid Genes 5 1.5 Regulation of Plastid Gene Transcription 6 1.6 Applications of Plastomic sequences for Addressing Plant Evolution 8 1.7 Plastid Inheritance 9 1.8 What are Gymnosperms? 10 1.9 Why Cupressophyta? 11 1.10 Research Purposes 12 CHAPTER 2. Ancient Nuclear Plastid DNA in the Yew Family 14 2.1 Introduction 14 2.2 Materials and Methods 16 2.2.1 DNA Extraction, Sequencing, and Genome Assembly 16 2.2.2 Genome Annotation and Sequence Alignment 16 2.2.3 Exploration of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs), Indels, and Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) Sequences 17 2.2.4 Construction of Ancestral Plastomic Organization 17 2.2.5 PCR Amplification, Cloning, and Sequencing 17 2.2.6 Phylogenetic Tree Analysis 18 2.2.7 Estimation of Mutations in Nuclear Plastid DNAs and Their Plastomic Counterparts 18 2.2.8 Plastome Map and Statistical Analyses 19 2.3 Results 19 2.3.1 Reduction and Compaction of the Plastome of T. mairei 19 2.3.2 Intra-species Variations in the Plastomes of T. mairei 20 2.3.3 Retrieval of Ancestral Plastome Sequences in Taxaceae 21 2.3.4 Characteristics of Potential Nupt Amplicons 22 2.3.5 Evolution of Nupt Sequences in Taxaceae 23 2.3.6 Ages of Nupts in Taxaceae 24 2.4 Discussion 24 2.4.1 Labile Plastomes of Yew Family and Their Impact on Phylogenetic Studies 24 2.4.2 PCR-Based Approach in Investigating Nupts: Pros and Cons 26 2.4.3 Nupts Are Molecular Footprints for Studying Plastomic Evolution 27 CHAPTER 3. Birth of Four Chimeric Plastid Gene Clusters in Sciadopitys verticillata 29 3.1 Introduction 29 3.2 Materials and Methods 30 3.2.1 DNA Extraction 30 3.2.2 Sequencing, Plastome Assembly, and Genome Annotation 31 3.2.3 Estimates of Dispersed Repeats and Plastomic Inversions 31 3.2.4 Detection of Isomeric Plastomes 32 3.2.5 Detection of RNA Transcripts in Chimeric Gene Clusters 32 3.3 Results and Discussion 32 3.3.1 Loss of IRA from S. verticillata Plastome 32 3.3.2 Pseudogenization of Four tRNA Genes after Tandem Duplications 34 3.3.3 Evolution of Plastid trnI-CAU Genes in S. verticillata 34 3.3.4 Presence of Two Isomeric Plastomes in S. verticillata 35 3.3.5 Birth of Four Chimeric Gene Clusters 36 3.3.6 Evolutionary Effects of Novel Chimeric Gene Clusters 38 CHAPTER 4. Conclusions 40 CHAPTER 5. Future Prospectives 42 FIGURES 43 TABLES 62 REFERENCES 69 PUBLICATIONS 84 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 紅豆杉科與傘松科植物色質體基因組分析:洞悉其核質
體DNA 與重組基因群 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Study on the Plastomic Organizations of Taxaceae and Sciadopityaceae:
Insights into Their Nuclear Plastid DNAs and Chimeric Gene Clusters | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 莊樹諄(Trees-Juen Chuang),蔡怡陞(Isheng Jason Tsai),王亞男(Ya-Nan Wang),陳豐奇(Feng-Chi Chen),可文亞(Wen-Ya Ko) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 色質體基因組,基因組重組,演化,核質體DNA,基因群,紅豆杉科,傘松科,針葉樹, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Plastome,Genomic reorganization,Evolution,Nupt,Gene cluster,Taxaceae,Sciadopityaceae,Conifer, | en |
dc.relation.page | 119 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201601257 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-07-25 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生命科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 基因體與系統生物學學位學程 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 基因體與系統生物學學位學程 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-105-1.pdf | 9.12 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。