Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/38517
Full metadata record
???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 周楚洋(Chu-Yang Chou) | |
dc.contributor.author | Jyun-Yao Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林軍耀 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T16:35:58Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2013-08-22 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2011-08-22 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-08-20 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. 林冠宏。2008。以海水養殖池厭氧污泥處理含鹽廢水。碩士論文。台北:國立臺灣大學生農學院生物產業機電工程學系研究所
2. 農業統計年報。2010。行政院農業委員會。 3. 陳麗加。1995。利用金柑醃漬鹽液生產單細胞蛋白質。碩士論文。台北:國立台灣大學園藝學研究所。 4. 雲林縣大埤數位機會中心。2008。http://dapi.yldoc.nfu.edu.tw/culture/show_culturn_3.php?now_page=&id=1 5. Avron, M., and A. Ben-Amotz. 1992. Dtmaliellu: Physiology, Biochemistry, and Biotechnology. Boca Raton. FL: CRC Press 6. APHA. 1992. Standard method for the examination of water and wastewater. 18th Edition. Washington. 7. Apte, S.K. and J. Thomas. 1997. Possible amelioration of coastal soil salinity using halotolerant nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria. Plant and Soil. 189:205–211. 8. Aspé, E., M.C. Marti and M. Roeckel. 1997. Anaerobic treatment of fishery wastewater using a marine sediment inoculums. Water Res. 31 (9):2147–2160. 9. Artiga, P., G. García-Toriello, R. Méndez, and J. M. Garrido. 2008. Use of a hybrid membrane bioreactor for the treatment of saline wastewater from a fish canning factory. Desalination. 221: 518–525. 10. Asker, D., and Y. Ohta. 1999. Production of canthaxanthin by extremely halophilic bacteria. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 88:617–621. 11. Bertrand, J.C., M. Almallah, M. Acquaviva, and G. Mille. 1990. Biodegradation of hydrocarbons by an extremely halophilic archaebacterium. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 11:260-263. 12. Boardman, G. D., J. L. Tisinger and D. L. Gallagher. 1995. Treatment of clam processing wastewaters by means of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket technology, Water Res. 29 (6):1483–1490. 13. Choi, M. H., and Y. H. Park. 1999. Growth of Pichia guilliermondii A9, an osmotolerant yeast, in waste brine generated from kimchi production. Bioresource Technology. 70:231-236. 14. Chou, C. Y. 1989. Computer Control of Anaerobic Reactor Untilizing a Nonlinear Self-Turning Regulator. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Florida. 15. Dincer, A. R., and F. Kargi. 2001. Performance of rotating biological disc system treating saline wastewater. Process Biochemistry. 36 (89): 901–906. 16. Donmez, G., and N. Kocherber. 2005. Bioaccumulation of hexavalent chromium by enriched microbial cultures obtained from molasses and NaCl containing media. Process Biochemistry. 40:2493-2498. 17. Edward, C. 1990. Microbiology of extreme environments. New York: McGraw-Hill. 18. Gebauer, R. 2004. Mesophilic anaerobic treatment of sludge from saline fish farm effluents with biogas production. Bioresour. Technol. 93 (2):155–167. 19. Guerrero, L., F. Omil, R. Méndez and J.M. Lema. 1997. Treatment of saline wastewaters from fish meal factories in an anaerobic filter under extreme ammonia concentrations, Bioresour. Technol. 61 (1):69–78. 20. Habets, L. H. A., A. J. H. H. Engelaar and N. Groeneveld. 1997. Anaerobic treatment of inuline effluent in an internal circulation reactor, Water Sci. Technol. 35 (10):189–197. 21. Ike, A., T. Murakawa, H. Kawaguchi, K. Hirata, and K. Miyamoto. 1999. Photoproduction of Hydrogen from Raw Starch Using a Halophilic Bacterial Community. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 88(1): 72-77. 22. Jacek. N., and Y. D. Hang. 2003. The rapid degradation of sauerkraut brine by free and immobilized yeast cells. Electronic journal of polish Agricultural Universities. 6(2): 13. 23. Kapdan, I.K., and B. Erten. 2007. Anaerobic treatment of saline wastewater by Halanaerobium lacusrosei. Process Biochemistry. 42:449–453. 24. Kargi F., and A.R. Dincer. 2006. Enhancement of biological treatment performance of saline wastewater by halophilic bacteria. Bioproc. Eng. 15: 51-58. 25. Kargi, F. and Uygur, A. 1996. Biological treatment of saline wastewater in anaerated percolator unit utilizing Halophilic Bacteria. Environ. Technol. 17: 325-330. 26. Kincannon, D. F., and A. F. Gaudy. 1968. Response of biological waste treatment systems to changes in salt concentrations. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 10: 483–496. 27. Kamekura, M. 1998. Diversity of extremely halophilic bacteria. Extremophiles. 2:289–295. 28. Kubo, M., J. Hiroe, M. Murakam, H. Fukami, and T. Tachiki. 2001. Treatment of hypersaline-containing wastewater with Salt-Tolerant Microorganisms. Journal Of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 91(2): 222-224. 29. Kugelman, I. J., and P. L. McCarty. 1965. Cation toxicity and stimulation in anaerobic waste treatment. Journal of Water Pollution. 37 (1): 97–116. 30. Lefebvre, O., N. Vasudevan. M. Torrijos. K. Thanasekaran. and R. Moletta. 2005. Halophilic biological treatment of tannery soak liquor in a sequencing batch reactor. Water Research. 39:1471-1480. 31. Lefebvre, O., and R. Moletta. 2006. Treatment of organic pollution in industrial saline wastewater: A literature review. Water Research. 40: 3671-3682. 32. Lefebvre,O., N. Vasudevan, M. Torrijos, K. Thanasekaran and R. Moletta. 2006. Anaerobic digestion of tannery soak liquor with an aerobic post-treatment. Water Res. 40 (7):1492–1500. 33. Margesin, R., and F. Schinner. 2001. Potential of halotolerant and halophilic microorganisms for biotechnology. Extremophiles. 5:73–83. 34. Mosquera-Corral, A., M. Sanchez, J. L. Campos, R. Mendez and J. M. Lema. 2001. Simultaneous methanogenesis and denitrification of pretreated effluents from a fish canning industry. Water Res. 35 (2):411–418. 35. Nieto, J. J. 1991. The response of halophilic bacteria to heavy metals. In General and Applied Aspects of Halophilic Microorganisms. 173-179. New York: PlenumPress. 36. Nott, B. R. 1981. Electrodialysis for recoverying acid and caustic from ion-exchange regneration wastes. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 20(l): 170-177. 37. Omil, F., R. Mendez, and J. M. Lema. 1995. Anaerobic treatment of saline wastewaters under high sulphide and ammonia content. Bioresource Technology. 54(3): 269–278. 38. Oren, A. 2002. Diversity of halophilic microorganisms: environments, phylogeny, physiology, and application. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology. 28:56–63. 39. Röling, W. F. M., and H. W. Verseveld. 1996. Characterization of Tetragenococcus halophila populations in Indonesian soy mash(kecap) fermentation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 62:1203–1207. 40. Rovirosa, N., E. Sanchez, M. Cruz, M. C. Veiga and R. Borja. 2004. Coliform concentration reduction and related performance evaluation of a down-flow anaerobic fixed bed reactor treating low-strength saline wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 94 (2):119–127. 41. Rudd, R. T. 1978. Guidelines for the disposal of dangerous and toxic wastes so as to minimise or prevent environmental and water pollution. South African National Scientific Programmes Report No. 24. Pretoria. Republic of South Africa. 42. Siman'kova, V.M., and G. A. Zavarzin. 1992. Anaerobic decomposition of cellulose in Lake Sivash and hypersaline lagoons of ArabatSpit. Microbiology. 61(2): 193–197. 43. Sivaprakasam, S., S. Mahadevan, S. Sekar, and S. Rajakumar. 2008. Biological treatment of tannery wastewater by using salt-tolerant bacterial strains. Microbial Cell Factories. 7:15. 44. Trevors, J.T., K. M. Oddie, and B. H. Belliveau. 1985. Metal resistance in bacteria. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 32: 39-54. 45. Uygur, A., and F. Kargi. 2004. Salt inhibition on biological nutrient removal from saline wastewater in a sequencing batch reactor. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 34:313-318. 46. Vitolo, S., L. Petarca and B. Bresci. 1999. Treatment of olive oil industry wastes, Bioresour. Technol. 67 (2): 129–137. 47. Ventosa, A., and J. J. Nieto. 1995. Biotechnological applications and potentialities of halophilic microorganisms. World journal of microbiology. 11:85–94. 48. Vyrides, I., and D.C. Stuckey. 2009. Saline sewage treatment using a submerged anaerobic membrane reactor (SAMBR):Effects of activated carbon addition and biogas-sparging time. Water research. 43:933–942. 49. Woolard, C. R., and R. L. Irvine. 1994. Biological treatment of hypersaline wastewater by a biofilm of halophilic bacteria. Water Environment Research. 66:230–235. 50. Zhuang, X., Z. Han, Z. Bai, G. Zhuang, and H. Shim. 2010. Progress in decontamination by halophilic microorganisms in saline wastewater and soil. Environmental Pollution. 158: 1119-1126. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/38517 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 酸菜廢水中含有高濃度的鹽分以及有機質,若直接排放會造成嚴重的環境汚染,為解決此問題,本研究以馴化過的海水養蝦池厭氧汙泥處理此高鹽分的酸菜廢水。開始時先以人工廢水馴養厭氧汙泥,以逐步提高鹽度的方式,使菌種對高鹽度產生適應性。接著分別使用5%、7%與10%鹽度的人工廢水與稀釋至鹽度為6%與9%的酸菜廢水進行測試,測試時分別以HRT5天及10天進行操作。
當反應槽進流10%鹽度的人工廢水,在HRT為10天,有機負荷率(organic loading rate, OLR)為4 g COD/L/day的操作條件下,經24天的培養,發現pH從7.25下降至5.04,COD去除率從95.3%下降至64.6%,顯示過高的鹽度下假如不調整反應槽的pH,甲烷菌會受到抑制。 而稀釋酸菜廢水的試驗中,HRT依序操作在10天和5天,OLR分別為0.64 g COD/L/day與1.24 g COD/L/day。當鹽度為6%,HRT為10天時,可達到72%的COD去除率,氣體產率(gas production rate, GPR)與甲烷產率(methane production rate, MPR)分別為0.15 L/L/day與0.09 L CH4/L/day;HRT為5天時,相同的6%鹽度酸菜廢水則可達到75%的COD去除率,並且GPR與MPR分別為0.38 L/L/day與0.21 L CH4/L/day。顯示在6%的鹽度下,增加OLR對GPR與MPR有提升的效果,GPR與MPR在HRT 5天時分別為HRT 10天的3.17倍與2.73倍。 當進流酸菜廢水之鹽度提高至9%,HRT為10天時,OLR增加至0.85 g COD/L/day,GPR與MPR也上升至0.28 L/L/day與0.19 L CH4/L/day,平均COD去除率為78%,甲烷含量為72%,顯示在HRT為10天之條件下,鹽度即使達到9%,對甲烷菌抑制並不明顯。但是當HRT為5天時, pH會呈現持續下降,最後降至5.18,而COD去除率也降至18%。產氣同時也受到影響,GPR降至0.26 L/L/day,MPR降至0.10 L CH4/L/day,甲烷含量則為40%。因此在處理較高鹽度的廢水時,厭氧反應槽須操作在較大的HRT即較低的有機負荷。綜合言之,本研究成功地以馴養過的厭氧汙泥處理酸菜廢水並產生可燃燒的甲烷,對於處理酸菜廢水提供了新的解決方式,。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Pickled mustard wastewater must be treated prior to discharge or it will severely pollute the environment because of its high salinity and organic contents. To solve this problem, this study proposed using the acclimated anaerobic sludge from the seawater shrimp pond to treat this saline wastewater.
In the beginning, the anaerobic sludge was acclimated using the synthetic wastewater and through gradually step-increasing salt contents, these anaerobic bacteria were able to adapt to the saline environment. After acclimation, different tests of using 5, 7 and 10% of synthetic saline wastewater, and 6 and 9% of dilute pickled mustard wastewater were conducted. Both types of wastewater were operated at HRTs of 5 days and 10 days. When fed with 10% salt of synthetic wastewater, and operated at 10 days HRT and 4 g COD/L/day of organic loading rate, the performance results showed that pH dropped from 7.25 to 5.04 and COD removal efficiency was decreasing from 95.3% to 64.6% after 24 days. It indicated that the growth of anaerobic bacteria would be inhibited if the pH was not adjusted suitably for the high salt content wastewater. For tests of feeding dilute pickled mustard wastewater, the HRT were sequentially operated at 10 and 5 days with the OLR of 0.64 and 1.24 g COD/L/day, respectively. In test of 6% salt wastewater and 10 days HRT, 72% of the COD removal efficiency, and 0.15 L/L/day of GPR (gas production rate) and 0.09 L CH4/L/day of MPR (methane production rate) were achieved. With the same 6% salt wastewater, in test of 5 days HRT, a better performance results of 75% of the COD removal efficiency, and 0.38 L/L/day of GPR (gas production rate) and 0.21 L CH4/L/day of MPR (methane production rate) were achieved. It clearly indicated that, at 6% salt content, increasing OLR will improve the gas production GPR and MPR effectively. Comparing the results of HRT 5 days and 10 days, GPR and MPR were lifted up to 3.17 and 2.73 times, respectively. When feeding 9% salt content of dilute pickled mustard wastewater, in test of 10 days HRT, the OLR was increasing to 0.85 g COD/L/day. Both GPR and MPR were increasing to 0.28 L/L/day and 0.19 L CH4/L/day, respectively, and 78% of the average COD removal efficiency and 72% of methane content were achieved. It showed that no indication of inhibiting the anaerobic bacteria under the condition of 10 days HRT and 9% of salt content. However, in test of 5 days HRT with the same 9% salt content, the pH kept on decreasing to 5.18 and the COD removal efficiency was decreasing to only 18%. The gas production was affected either, both GPR and MPR were decreasing to 0.26 L/L/day and 0.10 L CH4/L/day, respectively, and the methane content was decreasing to 40%. Therefore, in treatment of the high salt content wastewater, the anaerobic reactor should be operated at a longer HRT, i.e., a lower OLR. In summary, this study provides a new method by using the acclimated anaerobic sludge treated the pickled mustard wastewater and produced the combustible methane gas successfully. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T16:35:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R98631011-1.pdf: 3074807 bytes, checksum: 39aae48de7a2be6672279051deb7d0ba (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
摘要 ii Abstract iii 目錄 v 圖目錄 vii 表目錄 viii 第一章 前言與研究目的 1 第二章 文獻探討 4 2-1 芥菜醃製過程 4 2-1-1 好氧處理 4 2-1-2 厭氧處理 5 2-1-3 其他處理方式 7 2-2 嗜鹽性微生物(Halophiles) 7 2-2-1 嗜鹽性微生物的應用 7 2-2-2 利用嗜鹽性微生物處理含鹽廢水 11 第三章 材料與方法 14 3-1 實驗設備與材料 14 3-2 實驗流程 15 3-3 實驗設計 16 3-3-1 馴化階段 16 3-3-2 含鹽廢水測試 16 3-3-3 酸菜廢水測試 17 3-4 分析方法 17 第四章 結果與討論 20 4-1 原料成分分析 20 4-2 人工廢水測試與馴化 20 4-3 含鹽廢水測試 21 4-4 酸菜廢水測試 23 4-4-1 HRT10 天試驗 23 4-4-2 HRT5 天試驗 26 4-5 質量平衡(mass balance) 29 4-6 相關文獻比較 30 第五章 結論與建議 33 參考文獻 35 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 以厭氧耐鹽菌處理酸菜廢水 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Treatment of Pickled Mustard Wastewater by Using the Halotolerant Anaerobes | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李允中(Yeun-Chung Lee),陳力騏(Richie L. C. chen),程梅萍(Mei-Ping Cheng) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 酸菜廢水,厭氧,耐鹽菌,甲烷, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Pickled mustard wastewater,Anaerobic,Halotolerant bacteria,Methane, | en |
dc.relation.page | 39 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-08-20 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物產業機電工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
Appears in Collections: | 生物機電工程學系 |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf Restricted Access | 3 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.