Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 公共衛生學院
  3. 流行病學與預防醫學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/38223
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor黃景祥
dc.contributor.authorMei-Chu Huangen
dc.contributor.author黃美菊zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-13T16:28:15Z-
dc.date.available2008-08-16
dc.date.copyright2005-07-20
dc.date.issued2005
dc.date.submitted2005-07-14
dc.identifier.citationAgresti, A. (1981), 'Measures of Nominal-Ordinal Association,' Journal of American Statistical Association, 76, 524-529.
Agresti, A. (1984), Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data, New York: Wiley.
Agresti, A. (2002), Categorical Data Analysis (Second ed.), New York: Wiley.
Albert, A., and Anderson, J. A. (1984), 'On the Existence of Maximum Likelihood Estimates in Logistic Regression Models,' Biometrika, 71, 1-10.
Begg, C. B., and R. Gray. (1984), 'Calculation of Polytomous Logistic Regression Parameters Using Individualized Regressions,' Biometrika, 71, 11-18.
Bowling., A. (1995), Measuring Disease: A Review of Quality of Life Measurement Scale, Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Campbell A, C. P., Rodgers W. (1976), The Quality of American Life, New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
Dobson, A. J. (1990), An Introduction to Generalized Linear Models, London: Chapman & Hall.
Fang, C.-T., Hsiung, P-C., Yu, C-F., Chen, M-Y., & Wang, J-D. (2002), 'Validation of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (Whoqol) Instrument in Patients with Hiv Infection,' Quality of Life Research, in press.
Ferrans, C., & Powers, M. (1992), 'Psychometric Assessment of the Quality of Life Index,' Research in Nursing and Health, 15, 29-38.
Ferrans, C., & Powers, M. (1985), 'Quality of Life Index: Development and Psychometric Properties,' Advances in Nursing Science, 8, 15-24.
Ferrans, C. E. (1990), 'Development of a Quality of Life Index for Patients with Cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum,' Oncology Nursing Forum, 17(3), 15-19.
Hamilton, L. C. (1991), Regression with Graphics, Duxbury Press.
Hass, B. K. (1999), 'Clarification and Integration of Similar Quality of Life Concepts,' Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 31(3), 215-220.
Hosmer, D. W., and Stanley Lemeshow (2000), Applied Logistic Regression, Wiley.
Hung, Y. (2002), Sampling Design of the National Health Interview Survey, NHIS Brief Communication No. 2.
Lawton, M. P. (1983), 'The Varieties of Well-Being,' Experimental Ageing Research, 9, 65-72.
Mandy C. Webb, J. R. W., and Jenny Chong. (2004), 'An Analysis of Quasi-Complete Binary Data with Logistic Models: Applications to Alcohol Abuse Data,' Journal of Data Science, 2, 273-285.
McCullagh, P., and Nelder, J. A. (1989), Generalized Linear Models (Second ed.), London: Chapman & Hall.
McDowell, I. a. C. N. (1996), Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires, New York: Oxford University Press.
Meeberg, G. (1993), 'Quality of Life: A Concept Analysis,' Journal of Advanced Nursing, 18, 32-38.
Noerholm, V., Groenvold, M., Watt, T., Bjorner, J. B., Rasmussen, N.-A. & Bech, P. (2004), 'Quality of Life in the Danish General Population: Normative Data and Validity of WHOQOL-BREF Using Rasch and Item Response Theory Models,' Quality of Life Research, 13, 531-540.
Norholm V., B. P. (2001), 'The Who Quality of Life (Whoqol) Questionnaire: Danish Validation Study.,' Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 55, 229-235.
Pregibon D. (1981), 'Logistic Regression Diagnostics,' The Annals of Statistics, 9, 705-724.
Santner, T. J., and Duffy, D. E. (1986), 'A Note on A. Albert's and J. A. Anderson's Conditions for the Existence of Maximum Likelihood Estimates in Logistic Regression Models,' Biometrika, 73, 755-758.
Simonoff, J. S. (1998), 'Logistic Regression, Categorical Predictors, and Goodness-of-Fit: It Depends on Who You Ask,' The American Statistician, 52, 10-14.
Skevington, S. M., Lotfy, M., & O'Connell, K. A. (2004), 'The World Health Organization's Whoqol-Bref Quality of Life Assessment: Psychometric Properties and Results of the International Field Trial. A Report from the Whoqol Group.,' Quality of Life Research, 13, 299-310.
Strokes, M. E., Davis, C. S., and Koch, G. G. (2001), Categorical Data Analysis Using the SAS System (Second ed.), Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
Szabo, S. (1996), The World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) Assessment Instrument. In Spilker B (Ed.), Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials, Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven.
Thompson, L. A. (2005), S-Plus (and R) Manual to Accompany Agresti's Categorical Data Analysis (Second ed.),
Wang, W.-C., Hsieh C.-L., and Tsai, Y.-J. (in press), 'Validation and Normative Data of the WHOQOL-BREF in Taiwan Using Multidimensional Rasch Analysis.'
WHO (1993), WHOQOL Study Protocol, Geneva: World Health Organization.
Yao, G., Chung, C-W., Yu, C-F., & Wang, J-D. (2002), 'Development and Verification of Validity Andreliability of the Whoqol-Bref Taiwan Version,' Journal of the Formosan Medicine Association, 101, 342-351.
Zhan, L. (1992), 'Quality of Life: Conceptual and Measurement Issues,' Journal of Advanced Nursing, 17, 795-800.
石曜堂、張新儀、樂冠華、林明珠、蘇文川 (2002),國民健康訪問調查簡介,國民健康訪問調查簡訊,第一冊。
林春香、劉雪娥、王正儀 (1996),大腸直腸癌病患生活品質及其相關因素探討,護理研究,1(4),369-379
林淑慧 (2002),國民健康訪問調查實地訪查資料搜集與完成狀況,國民健康訪問調查簡訊,第四冊。
林榮第、姚開屏、游芝亭、王榮德(1997):健康相關生活品質之效用測量方法的效度與信度的評估,中華公共衛生雜誌,16,404-416。
洪永泰 (2002),國民健康訪問調查抽樣設計,國民健康訪問調查簡訊,第二冊。
姚開屏 (1999),台灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷之發展及使用手冊,第一版,台灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷發展小組。
姚開屏 (2002),健康相關生活品質概念與測量原理之簡介,臺灣醫學,6(2),183-192。
姚開屏 (2002),健康相關生活品質概念與測量原理之簡介,臺灣醫學,6(2),193-200。
張鳳琴、張晞雁、劉夏園、吳聖良 (2002),國民健康訪問調查問卷設計介紹,國民健康訪問調查簡訊,第三冊。
戴政, 江淑瓊 (2000),生物醫學統計概論,翰蘆圖書出版公司。
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/38223-
dc.description.abstract隨著時代變化,社會、經濟發展及知識水準的提升,人們對於生活不再以物質層面為追求目標,轉而越來越重視生活品質的營造,因此測度生活品質及尋找其影響因子,著手改善生活品質,已然成為近年來之研究興趣。本研究目的為利用國家衛生研究院與國民健康局於2001所合作的國家健康訪問調查資料,找出影響一般民眾生活品質之重要因素,作為未來衛生政策決策者及醫療工作者制定醫療相關政策及治療策略發展方向的參考。
  以往生活品質相關研究之分析方法著重於描述性分析、t檢定、皮爾森相關係數、單因子變異數分析及迴歸分析等方法,此研究套用基底類別羅吉斯迴歸模型分析生活品質問卷分數,但礙於目前尚未發展其配適指標及迴歸診斷技巧,改利用基底類別羅吉斯模型之概念,先以二元羅吉斯迴歸模型個別分析,進行共線性、相關性檢定、模型比較及迴歸診斷,取得最佳模型之解釋變數集後再作為基底類別羅吉斯迴歸模型之自變數,重新分析。
  研究結果發現,生活品質之相關因子多為民眾健康狀況或健康行為相關變項,顯示生活品質與民眾身體健康狀況密切相關,其中又以民眾活動是否有困難相關最為顯著。而教育程度、婚姻狀況、信仰為基督教、天主教、居住於宜花東地區、過去一年之住院次數、過去一個月看中醫次數、運動次數、體重是否有明顯變化及目前是否增加體重等變項,相對於基底組之勝負比比率顯著地高或低,可將以上變數視為生活品質之重大相關因子。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIn recent year, quality of life (QOL) has been heavily used in the evaluation of health care. This study used WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version for assessing the QOL. The main purpose of this study was to identify factors affecting the QOL in the Taiwan general population. Data were obtained from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) in Taiwan which used a multi-staged stratified systematic sampling scheme in 2001. Each of the four domains of the questionnaire scores were to be fit with baseline-category logistic models, but the goodness-of-fit test and the technique for diagnostic have not been developed yet. We proposed to fit the questionnaire scale by two binary logistic models separately. After model diagnostics and comparison, we fit the questionnaire scale by baseline-category logistic model with the independent variables of the final selected models.
The findings revealed that (1) the QOL was mostly affected by the physical state of individuals. The worse the physical state, the worse the QOL. This situation was most significant for the individuals with life activity difficult; (2) People aged 60-65 years had better QOL in the psychological and environmental domains; (3) Married people had the better QOL, especially for the social domain; (4) People lived in the eastern Taiwan had better QOL in overall domains, and People lived in the mountain region also had better QOL in the social domain; (5) In the past month, the people had gone see a doctor of traditional Chinese medicine between 4-5 times had worse QOL and (6) People have been gaining weight had worse QOL in the overall domains.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T16:28:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-94-R92842023-1.pdf: 1320378 bytes, checksum: 7b92d59965fb3fb850219c9b1f664f88 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2005
en
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 - 1 -
第二章 生活品質之簡介 - 5 -
2.1 生活品質之概念起源 - 5 -
2.2 生活品質名詞之概念釐清 - 5 -
2.3 多方學者對於生活品質之定義 - 6 -
2.4 多方學者對於生活品質之評定標準 - 8 -
2.5 世界衛生組織之生活品質定義 - 9 -
2.6 生活品質之測量工具 - 10 -
2.7 世界衛生組織生活品質問卷之發展沿革 - 11 -
2.8 台灣簡明版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷之引進 - 12 -
第三章 資料簡介 - 13 -
3.1 資料背景 - 13 -
3.2 抽樣設計 - 13 -
3.3 資料收集 - 15 -
第四章 探索性分析 - 18 -
4.1 資料限制 - 18 -
4.2 反應變數定義 - 19 -
4.3 分析困難 - 21 -
4.4 變項彙整 - 22 -
4.4.1 類別變項 - 23 -
4.4.2 連續變項 - 24 -
4.5 變項初步探究 - 25 -
4.5.1 描述性分析 - 25 -
4.5.2 生活品質與解釋變數關係之初探 - 32 -
第五章 研究方法 - 37 -
5.1 分析設計 - 37 -
5.2.1 逼近基底類別羅吉斯迴歸模型之概念 - 38 -
5.2.2 採用的統計模型 - 39 -
5.2.3 逼近基底類別羅吉斯迴歸模型結果 - 40 -
5.2.4 未採用累積羅吉斯迴歸模型之原因 - 41 -
5.2.5 模型比較、診斷指標 - 44 -
5.3 分析結果 - 45 -
5.3.1 共線性診斷 - 46 -
5.3.2 相關性分析 - 46 -
5.3.3 模型比較 - 47 -


第六章 分析結果 - 51 -
6.1 對於生活品質具鑑別力之因子 - 51 -
6.1.1 生理範疇 - 51 -
6.1.2 心理範疇 - 53 -
6.1.3 社會範疇 - 54 -
6.1.4 環境範疇 - 56 -
6.2 變項相異類別間對於生活品質之影響 - 57 -
6.2.1 人口特性 - 58 -
6.2.2 個人健康狀況 - 63 -
6.2.3 醫療服務利用情形 - 64 -
6.2.4 個人健康行為 - 66 -
6.2.5 工作與經濟狀況 - 70 -
第七章 結論與建議 - 73 -
參考文獻 - 79 -
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject國家健康訪問調查zh_TW
dc.subject羅吉斯迴歸模型zh_TW
dc.subject生活品質zh_TW
dc.subjectNHISen
dc.subjectQOLen
dc.subjectQuality of Lifen
dc.subjectLogistic regressionen
dc.title影響臺灣民眾健康生活品質的因素探討zh_TW
dc.titleExamination of factors affecting the Quality of Life in the Taiwanese general populationen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear93-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.coadvisor張淑惠
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee陳君厚,蔡蓉青
dc.subject.keyword生活品質,國家健康訪問調查,羅吉斯迴歸模型,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordQuality of Lif,QOL,NHIS,Logistic regression,en
dc.relation.page117
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2005-07-14
dc.contributor.author-college公共衛生學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept流行病學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:流行病學與預防醫學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-94-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
1.29 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved