請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/37996
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林俊彬 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yuan-Yi Tung | en |
dc.contributor.author | 童元釔 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T15:55:33Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2013-08-13 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2008-08-13 | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2008-06-16 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Park, H.S., T.G. Kwon, and O.W. Kwon, Treatment of open bite with microscrew implant anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2004. 126(5): p. 627-36.
2. Kuroda, S., A. Katayama, and T. Takano-Yamamoto, Severe anterior open-bite case treated using titanium screw anchorage. Angle Orthod, 2004. 74(4): p. 558-67. 3. Erverdi, N., A. Keles, and R. Nanda, The use of skeletal anchorage in open bite treatment: a cephalometric evaluation. Angle Orthod, 2004. 74(3): p. 381-90. 4. Umemori, M., et al., Skeletal anchorage system for open-bite correction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1999. 115(2): p. 166-74. 5. Creekmore, T.D. and M.K. Eklund, The possibility of skeletal anchorage. J Clin Orthod, 1983. 17(4): p. 266-9. 6. Roberts, W.E., et al., Osseous adaptation to continuous loading of rigid endosseous implants. Am J Orthod, 1984. 86(2): p. 95-111. 7. Roberts, W.E., C.L. Nelson, and C.J. Goodacre, Rigid implant anchorage to close a mandibular first molar extraction site. J Clin Orthod, 1994. 28(12): p. 693-704. 8. Block, M.S. and D.R. Hoffman, A new device for absolute anchorage for orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1995. 107(3): p. 251-8. 9. Costa, A., M. Raffainl, and B. Melsen, Miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage: a preliminary report. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, 1998. 13(3): p. 201-9. 10. Poggio, P.M., et al., 'Safe zones': a guide for miniscrew positioning in the maxillary and mandibular arch. Angle Orthod, 2006. 76(2): p. 191-7. 11. Miyawaki, S., et al., Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2003. 124(4): p. 373-8. 12. Cheng, S.J., et al., A prospective study of the risk factors associated with failure of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2004. 19(1): p. 100-6. 13. Liou, E.J., B.C. Pai, and J.C. Lin, Do miniscrews remain stationary under orthodontic forces? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2004. 126(1): p. 42-7. 14. 劉得均,劉佳觀,張志涵, Biomechanical investigation of miniscrews for orthodontic anchorage. 國立成功大學口腔醫學所碩士論文, 2006. 15. Wilmes, B., et al., Parameters affecting primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants. J Orofac Orthop, 2006. 67(3): p. 162-74. 16. Kim, J.W., S.J. Ahn, and Y.I. Chang, Histomorphometric and mechanical analyses of the drill-free screw as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2005. 128(2): p. 190-4. 17. Bahr, W., The effects of pre-tapping on the miniscrew-bone interface in the midface. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 1989. 17(8): p. 337-9. 18. Motoyoshi, M., et al., Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic mini-implant. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2006. 17(1): p. 109-14. 19. Park, H.S., S.H. Jeong, and O.W. Kwon, Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2006. 130(1): p. 18-25. 20. Chen, Y.J., et al., A retrospective analysis of the failure rate of three different orthodontic skeletal anchorage systems. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2007. 18(6): p. 768-75. 21. Kuroda, S., et al., Clinical use of miniscrew implants as orthodontic anchorage: success rates and postoperative discomfort. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2007. 131(1): p. 9-15. 22. Kuroda, S., et al., Root proximity is a major factor for screw failure in orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2007. 131(4 Suppl): p. S68-73. 23. Wu, J., et al., [Stability of the miniscrew implant during healing period]. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi, 2006. 41(4): p. 226-7. 24. Tseng, Y.C., et al., The application of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2006. 35(8): p. 704-7. 25. Chen, C.H., et al., The use of microimplants in orthodontic anchorage. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2006. 64(8): p. 1209-13. 26. Buchter, A., et al., Load-related implant reaction of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2005. 16(4): p. 473-9. 27. Moon, C.H., et al., Factors associated with the success rate of orthodontic miniscrews placed in the upper and lower posterior buccal region. Angle Orthod, 2008. 78(1): p. 101-6. 28. Wang, Y.C. and E.J. Liou, Comparison of the loading behavior of self-drilling and predrilled miniscrews throughout orthodontic loading. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2008. 133(1): p. 38-43. 29. Chao, C.K., et al., Increasing bending strength of tibial locking screws: mechanical tests and finite element analyses. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2007. 22(1): p. 59-66. 30. Lin, J. and S.M. Hou, Bending strength and holding power of a prototype tibial locking screw. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2002(403): p. 232-9. 31. Abshire, B.B., et al., Characteristics of pullout failure in conical and cylindrical pedicle screws after full insertion and back-out. Spine J, 2001. 1(6): p. 408-14. 32. Reitman, C.A., L. Nguyen, and G.R. Fogel, Biomechanical evaluation of relationship of screw pullout strength, insertional torque, and bone mineral density in the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2004. 17(4): p. 306-11. 33. Hitchon, P.W., et al., Factors affecting the pullout strength of self-drilling and self-tapping anterior cervical screws. Spine, 2003. 28(1): p. 9-13. 34. Lin, J., et al., Bending strength and holding power of tibial locking screws. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2001(385): p. 199-206. 35. DeCoster, T.A., et al., Optimizing bone screw pullout force. J Orthop Trauma, 1990. 4(2): p. 169-74. 36. Cleek, T.M., K.J. Reynolds, and T.C. Hearn, Effect of screw torque level on cortical bone pullout strength. J Orthop Trauma, 2007. 21(2): p. 117-23. 37. Halsey, D., et al., External fixator pin design. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1992(278): p. 305-12. 38. Liu, J., K.A. Lai, and Y.L. Chou, Strength of the pin-bone interface of external fixation pins in the iliac crest. A biomechanical study. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1995(310): p. 237-44. 39. Chapman, J.R., et al., Factors affecting the pullout strength of cancellous bone screws. J Biomech Eng, 1996. 118(3): p. 391-8. 40. Glauser, C.R., et al., Mechanical testing of small fracture implants for comparison of insertion and failure torques. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2003. 123(8): p. 388-91. 41. Hsu, C.C., et al., Multiobjective optimization of tibial locking screw design using a genetic algorithm: Evaluation of mechanical performance. J Orthop Res, 2006. 24(5): p. 908-16. 42. Hsu, C.C., et al., Increase of pullout strength of spinal pedicle screws with conical core: biomechanical tests and finite element analyses. J Orthop Res, 2005. 23(4): p. 788-94. 43. Carano, A., et al., Mechanical properties of three different commercially available miniscrews for skeletal anchorage. Prog Orthod, 2005. 6(1): p. 82-97. 44. Kim, J.W., I.S. Cho, S.J Lee, and Y.I. Chang, Mechanical analysis of taper shape and length of orthodontic mini-implant for initial stability. Korean J Orthodon, 2006. 36(1): p. 55-62. 45. Kim, J.W., I.S. Cho, S.J. Lee, T.W. Kim, and Y.I. Chang, Effect of dual pitch mini-implant design and diameter of an orthodontic mini-implant on the insertion and removal torque. Korean J Orthodon, 2006. 36(4): p. 275-283. 46. Song, Y.Y., J.Y. Cha, and C.J. Hwang, Mechanical characteristics of various orthodontic mini-screws in relation to artificial cortical bone thickness. Angle Orthod, 2007. 77(6): p. 979-85. 47. Jolley, T.H. and C.H. Chung, Peak torque values at fracture of orthodontic miniscrews. J Clin Orthod, 2007. 41(6): p. 326-8. 48. Lim, S.A., J.Y. Cha, and C.J. Hwang, Insertion torque of orthodontic miniscrews according to changes in shape, diameter and length. Angle Orthod, 2008. 78(2): p. 234-40. 49. Tada, S., et al., Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2003. 18(3): p. 357-68. 50. Petrie, C.S. and J.L. Williams, Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2005. 16(4): p. 486-94. 51. Chun, H.J., et al., Evaluation of design parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis. J Oral Rehabil, 2002. 29(6): p. 565-74. 52. Motoyoshi, M., et al., Biomechanical effect of abutment on stability of orthodontic mini-implant. A finite element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2005. 16(4): p. 480-5. 53. Veziroglu, F., et al., Stability of zygomatic plate-screw orthodontic anchorage system. Angle Orthod, 2008. 78(5): p. 902-7. 54. Chen, Y.J., et al., Removal torque of miniscrews used for orthodontic anchorage--a preliminary report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2006. 21(2): p. 283-9. 55. Yao, C.C., et al., Intrusion of the overerupted upper left first and second molars by mini-implants with partial-fixed orthodontic appliances: a case report. Angle Orthod, 2004. 74(4): p. 550-7. 56. Yao, C.C., et al., Maxillary molar intrusion with fixed appliances and mini-implant anchorage studied in three dimensions. Angle Orthod, 2005. 75(5): p. 754-60. 57. Chen, Y.J., C.C. Yao, and H.F. Chang, Nonsurgical correction of skeletal deep overbite and class II division 2 malocclusion in an adult patient. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2004. 126(3): p. 371-8. 58. Inceoglu, S., L. Ferrara, and R.F. McLain, Pedicle screw fixation strength: pullout versus insertional torque. Spine J, 2004. 4(5): p. 513-8. 59. Okuyama, K., et al., Can insertional torque predict screw loosening and related failures? An in vivo study of pedicle screw fixation augmenting posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine, 2000. 25(7): p. 858-64. 60. Hansson, S. and M. Werke, The implant thread as a retention element in cortical bone: the effect of thread size and thread profile: a finite element study. J Biomech, 2003. 36(9): p. 1247-58. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/37996 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 近年來,隨著骨性錨定應用於齒顎矯正的需求性提高,各種不同設計的迷你骨釘陸續被研發且廣泛應用於臨床治療,許多研究已證實矯正用迷你骨釘的臨床效益,但目前臨床上仍存在待解決之問題包括: 骨釘周圍軟組織發炎、使用中鬆脫或植入骨釘斷裂的情形,再者,有關矯正骨釘本身機械性質測試的基礎研究相對較少,故本實驗的目的在探討迷你骨釘的螺紋深度、中心錐度及錐形圈數等幾何設計,對於植入扭力、植體穩定性及骨釘和周圍骨頭應力集中的影響,並與有限元素分析進行驗證,其結果將作為日後迷你骨釘設計的準則。
本實驗包括兩部份,第一部份乃評估兩家市售之迷你骨釘(Mondeal, German; Osstem, Korea)的機械性質表現; 第二個部份將利用四種自製的迷你骨釘,以分析植體的幾何參數(螺紋深度(mm)/中心錐度(°)/錐形圈數(c))對於機械特性的影響,四種骨釘分別為 s1(0.4/7/4)、s2(0.4/0/0)、s3(0.4/7/2)、s4(0.32/7/2)。實驗流程如下: (1) 以有限元素方式利用彎矩與抗拉測試分析,評估在不同螺紋參數改變下,迷你骨釘本身的應力分佈與位移量。(2) 以有限元素分析的設計所製作出四種骨釘,及兩種市售迷你骨釘,分別進行植入扭力及抗拉出能力的測試,並以0.48 g/cc的人造假骨作為植入體。(3) 選取s1骨釘進行彎矩測試,以應變規量測人造假骨表面應變的變化,驗證有限元素分析結果,間接得知骨釘及骨頭周圍應力集中狀況。實驗結果如下: 植入扭力值比較為Osstem(26.19 ± 1.36 Ncm) > Mondeal(17.86 ± 1.24 Ncm),s1(28.79 ± 2.59 Ncm) > s3(24.20 ± 1.11 Ncm),s3(24.20 ± 1.11 Ncm) > s2(21.78 ± 1.83 Ncm) 及s3(24.20 ± 1.11 Ncm) > s4(21.39 ± 0.49 Ncm); 最大抗拉力量的比較為Osstem(138.15 ± 9.87N) > Mondeal(95.09 ± 17.19N),s1(113.9 ± 8.37N) > s3(81.44 ± 6.77N),s2(96.63 ± 6.7N) > s3(81.44 ± 6.77N) 及s4(102.9 ± 12.8N) > s3(81.44 ± 6.77N)。 本研究結論如下: 1. Osstem比Mondeal具較高的植入扭力及抗拉出能力。 2. 適度增加螺紋深度、錐度與錐形圈數將提高植入扭力及抗拉出能力。 3. 過大的螺紋深度、錐度或錐形圈數反而會減低抗拉能力。 4. 有限元素分析可作為迷你骨釘受力時應力集中分析之研究工具。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Recently, the use of skeletal anchorage is increasingly popular in modern clinical orthodontics. Many different designs of miniscrews were developed and widely applied in clinics, and their advantages have been proved by many studies. However, there were still some problems to be solved during clinical use of orthodontic miniscrews, including surrounding soft tissue inflammation, loosening in use, or breakage during implantation. Moreover, the mechanical properties of orthodontic miniscrews have few been studied. Therefore, the purpose of the study is to investigate the effects of geometrical parameters, including thread depth, taper of core, and circles of taper of miniscrews on its insertional torque, pullout strength, and stress distribution. These mechanical properties were assessed using standardized laboratory set-up and finite element analysis (FEA). The results will be applied to the development of new miniscrew systems in the future.
The study includes two parts. Part I was to evaluate the mechanical behavior of two commercial available miniscrews (Mondeal, German; Osstem, Korea). Part II was to analyze how the following geometric properties would affect the mechanical performance with four custom-made miniscrews. They have different designs in thread depth(mm)/taper of core(°)/circles of taper(c): s1(0.4/7/4)、s2(0.4/0/0)、s3(0.4/7/2)、s4(0.32/7/2). The procedures were as follows: (1) To evaluate how the different geometrical parameters will affect the stress distribution and displacement of miniscrews during bending and pullout test simulated by FEA. (2) Mechanical tests for insertion and pullout, and the samples were four custom-made miniscrews developed according to the designs of FEA and two other commercial miniscrews. The bone were used with Sawbones (0.48g/cc). (3) Choosing s1 for mechanical bending test and measuring the strain on the surface of the Sawbones surrounding the miniscrews with strain gauge. This result will be compared with the result of the FEA and get the stress distribution around the miniscrews indirectly. The results of this study were listed as follows, the comparison of the insertional torque: Osstem(26.19 ± 1.36 Ncm) > Mondeal(17.86 ± 1.24 Ncm), s1(28.79 ± 2.59 Ncm) > s3(24.20 ± 1.11 Ncm), s3(24.20 ± 1.11 Ncm) > s2(21.78 ± 1.83 Ncm), and s3(24.20 ± 1.11 Ncm) > s4(21.39 ± 0.49 Ncm); the comparison of the maximum pullout force: Osstem(138.15 ± 9.87N) > Mondeal(95.09 ± 17.19N), s1(113.9 ± 8.37N) > s3(81.44 ± 6.77N), s2(96.63 ± 6.7N) > s3(81.44 ± 6.77N), and s4(102.9 ± 12.8N) > s3(81.44 ± 6.77N). The conclusion were: 1. Both the insertional torque and the resistance to pull-out test of the Osstem miniscrew were higher than those of Mondeal. 2. An appropriate increase in thread depth, taper of the core, and thread number at the taper part of miniscrew resulted in larger insertion torque, increased resistance to pullout, which implied better retention. 3. Exaggerated increase of thread depth, taper of the core or the circles of taper will decrease the resistance to pullout. 4. FEA is a good tool for studying the stress and strain distribution of miniscrews subjected to loading. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T15:55:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-P94422003-1.pdf: 1228955 bytes, checksum: 1c3118ae795d3b49be077ce877ea5645 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄………………………………………………………………………. I
表目錄……………………………………………………………………. II 圖目錄……………………………………………………………………. III 中文摘要…………………………………………………………………. V 英文摘要…………………………………………………………………. VII 第一章 緒論…..…………………………………………………………. 1 第二章 研究目的..………………………………………………………. 11 第三章 材料與方法…………………………..…………………………. 12 第四章 結果………………………………………………………..……. 18 第五章 討論………………………………………………………..……. 25 第六章 結論……..………………………………………………………. 36 附表………………………………………………………………………. 38 附圖………………………………………………………………………. 46 參考文獻…………………………………………………………………. 66 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 矯正用迷你骨釘系統之機械測試及有限元素分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Mechanical and Finite Element Analysis of Mini-screw Systems for Orthodontic Anchorage | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 陳羿貞,陳文斌 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 單秋成,賴向華 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 矯正用迷你骨釘,迷你骨釘穩定性,植入扭力,有限元素分析, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | orthodontic mini-screws,the stability of mini-screws,insertional torque,finite element analysis, | en |
dc.relation.page | 71 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2008-06-16 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 臨床牙醫學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 臨床牙醫學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-97-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.2 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。