請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/37984完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 唐牧群 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yi-Jo Hsieh | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 謝伊柔 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T15:54:54Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2016-08-12 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2011-08-12 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2011-08-09 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 吳宛青（2010）。評估社會性導覽工具對探索性檢索經驗之愉悅性的影響。未出
版之碩士論文，國立台灣大學圖書資訊學研究所，台北市。 洪承理（2010）。使用者查詢擴展行為研究：以MeSH為詞彙來源的建議詞彙工 具為例。未出版之碩士論文，國立台灣大學圖書資訊學研究所，台北 市。 陳向明（2002）。社會科學質的研究。台北市：五南。 楊明璧 & 鍾明峻（2005）。應用選擇集合模式分析消費者選擇店家之決策過程 ─以電腦大賣場為研究對象。東吳經濟商學學報，49，1-38。 Benyon, D., & Hook, K. (1997). Navigation in information spaces: supporting the individual. Paper presented at the Proceedings of INTERACT’97, New York. Benyon, D. (2001). The new HCI? navigation of information space. Knowledge- Based Systems, 14(8), 425-430. Cooper, W.S. (1978). A Perspective on the Measurement of Retrieval Effectiveness. Drexel Library Quarterly, 14(2), 25-39. Dieberger, A., Dourish, P., Hook, K., Resnick, P., & Wexeblat, A. (2000). Social navigation: techniques for building more usable systems. Interactions, 7(6), 36-45. Dieberger, A. (1997). Supporting social navigation on the world wide web. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 46, 805-825. Dourish, P., & Chalmers, M. (1994). Running out space: models of information navigation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Computer-Human Interaction (HCI’94). Farzan, R., & Brusilovsky, P. (2009). Social navigation support information seeking: if you build it, will they come?. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5535, 66-77. Furner, J. (2002). On recommending. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(9), 747-763. Hassenzahl, M., & Sandweg, N. (2003). Mental Effort to Perceived Usability: Transforming Experiences into Summary Assessments. Paper presented at Proceedings of the CHI 2004 Conference on Human Factors in Computing. 65 Hassenzahl, M., & Tractinsky, N. (2006). User experience－a research agenda. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(2), 91-97. Hassenzahl, M. (2008). User Experience (UX): Towards an experiential perspective on product quality. Retrieved December29, 2010, From http://www.marchassenzahl. de/pdfs/hassenzahl-ihm08.pdf Hill, W.C., Hollan, J.D., Wroblewski, D., & Mccandless, T. (1992). Edit wear and read wear. In Bauersfeld, P., Bennett, J., & Lynch, G. (eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, 3-9. Lin, T.M.Y., Luarn, P., & Huang, Y.K. (2005). Effect of internet reviews on purchase intention: a focus group study. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31(5), 461- 468. Linden, G., Smith, B., & York, J. (2003). Amazon. com recommendations: Item-toitem collaborative filtering. IEEE Internet computing, 7(1), 76-80. Kumar, N., & Benbasat, I. (2006). The influence of recommendations and consumer reviews on evaluations of websites. Information Systems Research, 17(4), 425-439. Marchionini, G. (2006). Exploratory search: from finding to understanding. Communications of the ACM, 49(4), 41–46. Millen, D., Yang , M., Whittaker, S., & Feinberg, J.(2007). Social bookmarking and exploratory search. Paper presented at the Proceeding of the Tenth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW). Narayana, C. L., & Markin, R. J. (1975) Consumer Behavioral and Product Performance: An Alternative Conceptualization. Journal of Marketing, 39(4), 1-6. Neuman, W. L. (2000). Social Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA. Philip, N. (1970). Information and Consumer Behavior, Journal of Political Economy, 78(2), 311-329. Ree, M.J. (2003). Why review books? Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 28(1), 71-72. Resnick, P., & Varian, H. R. (1997). Recommender systems. Communications of the ACM, 40(3), 57. Robertson, S. E., & Hancock-Beaulieu, M. M. (1992). On the evaluation of IR 66 systems. Information Processing and Management: an International Journal, 28(4), 457-466. Salton, G. (1992). The State of Retrieval System Evaluation. Information Processing &Management, 28(4), 441-449. Schafer, J. B., Frankowski, D., Herlocker, J., & Sen, S. (2007). Collaborative filtering recommender systems. In The adaptive web (pp. 291–324). Sinha, R., & Swearingen, K. (2001). Comparing recommendations made by online systems and friends. Spiggle, S. & Sewall, M.A. (1987). A Choice-Sets Model of Retail Selection. Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 97-111. Svenonius, E. (2000). The intellectual foundation of information organization. MIT Press. Sun, H., & Zhang, P. (2006). The role of affect in IS research: A critical survey and a research model. HCI in MIS (I): Foundations. Tang, M. (2009). A study of academic library users' decision-making process: a Lens model approach. Journal of Documentation, 65(6), 938-957. White, R. W., Drucker, S. M., Marchionini, G., & Hearst, M. (2007). Exploratory search and HCI: designing and evaluating interfaces to support exploratory search interaction. White, R. W., Kules, B., & Drucker, S. M. (2006). Supporting Exploratory Search, Introduction, Special Issue, Communications of the ACM. Communications of the ACM, 49(4), 36-39. White, R. W., Marchionini, G., & Muresan, G. (2008). Evaluating exploratory search systems Introduction to special topic issue of information processing and management. Information Processing and Management, 44(2), 433-436. Xie, I. (2008). Interactive Information Retrieval in Digital Environment. Hershy, PA:IGI Pub. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/37984 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究旨在於嘗試探討評估探索式檢索的新指標，並以選擇集合模式之集合計算為基礎，試圖了解受試者於不同導覽工具（一般主題導覽工具�社會性導覽工具）之尋書效能，同時藉由探討受試者之使用者經驗的差異，理解社會性導覽工具是否能夠提供給讀者更多感興趣並符合檢索主題之衍生書籍。為有效達成上述之目的，採取實驗法進行實證研究。
本研究之發現歸納如下： （一）當受試者以社會性導覽工具進行尋書任務之時，過程中所經歷的使用者經驗優於一般性導覽工具。社會性導覽工具能夠帶給受試者有趣的瀏覽經驗、能夠幫助受試者認識更多感興趣但之前從未認識的書籍、幫助他們更容易判斷書籍的品質，並且讓他們更方便取得所需的書籍。 （二）在透過集合計算理解不同導覽工具之尋書效能的客觀層次上，受試者使用社會性導覽工具的尋書效能優於一般性導覽工具，社會性導覽工具能幫助受試者搜尋到更多能夠列入考慮的書籍，同時也幫助使用者找到更多符合情境任務的書籍。然而，在主觀認知的層次上，受試者使用社會性覽工具和一般性導覽工具之尋書效能在是否符合任務情境的需求以及新奇性上並無差異。但比起一般性導覽工具，社會性導覽工具能夠幫助受試者增加對於所選書籍之其他衍生書籍的認識，同時也有助於受試者在未來進行相關尋書任務時，更容易找到與所選書籍有關之其他衍生書籍。 （三）書籍類型（小說�非小說）與不同導覽工具之間在使用經驗與主觀尋書效能上並沒有交互作用的產生；在客觀尋書效能上，僅有「考慮集合�感知集合」此一項目上不同導覽工具與小說類型會產生交互作用，「選擇集合�感知集合」則同樣沒有交互作用產生。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T15:54:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R97126002-1.pdf: 2962467 bytes, checksum: a649a5116f3823b095d438829434857c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論...................................................................................................................1
第一節 研究動機.................................................................................................................... 1 第二節 研究問題與目的...................................................................................................... 3 第三節 研究範圍與限制...................................................................................................... 4 第四節 名詞解釋.................................................................................................................... 6 第二章 文獻分析..........................................................................................................9 第一節 社會性導覽工具與應用....................................................................................... 9 第二節 資訊取用的演進及其評估方法.......................................................................16 第三章 研究實施與設計.........................................................................................23 第一節 研究工具..................................................................................................................23 第二節 研究方法與設計....................................................................................................26 第三節 研究對象..................................................................................................................28 第四節 實驗流程..................................................................................................................28 第五節 資料收集與分析....................................................................................................30 第六節 研究流程..................................................................................................................34 第四章 研究結果與討論.........................................................................................35 第一節 使用者背景資料分析..........................................................................................35 第二節 不同導覽工具對使用經驗之影響..................................................................37 第三節 不同導覽工具對尋書效能之影響..................................................................40 第四節 書籍類型與不同導覽工具之交互作用........................................................46 第五節 評估問卷題項間之一致性.................................................................................49 第六節 小結............................................................................................................................53 第五章 研究結論與建議.........................................................................................55 第一節 研究結論..................................................................................................................55 第二節 研究建議..................................................................................................................57 附錄一：實驗前背景問卷......................................................................................59 附錄二：使用者經驗問卷......................................................................................61 附錄三：整體尋書結果問卷.................................................................................62 附錄四：個別書籍問卷..........................................................................................63 參考文獻.......................................................................................................................64 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 社會性導覽工具之評估研究－以推薦系統與使用者評論為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | On Evaluation Study of Search Effectiveness and User
Experience with Social Navigation Tools on Amazon.com | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林頌堅,柯皓仁 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 推薦系統,社會性導覽工具,探索式檢索,系統評估, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Recommendation System,Social Navigational Tools,Exploratory Search,System Evaluation, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 66 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2011-08-10 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 圖書資訊學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 圖書資訊學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-100-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.89 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。