Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 資訊管理學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/37894
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor翁崇雄
dc.contributor.authorShih-Feng Hungen
dc.contributor.author洪世峰zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-13T15:49:43Z-
dc.date.available2009-07-03
dc.date.copyright2008-07-03
dc.date.issued2008
dc.date.submitted2008-06-27
dc.identifier.citation中文部分
吳凱琳譯,(2002),創新的兩難,商周出版。Christensen M.C. (1997). The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business School Press.
馬培治,(2007),「IBM:ITIL不是IT服務管理的唯一聖經」,CNET.com,8月9日。
網站部分
http://www.itil.org/en/index.php (accessed on 2007/11)
http://www.itsmf.org/ itSMF. (accessed on 2007/11)
http://www.itsma.org.tw/ itSMF Taiwan. (accessed on 2008/11)
http://www.itsm.info/home.htm (accessed on 2007/11)
http://www.nextslm.org/itil/tc/ Malcolm Fry, BMC Software. (accessed on 2007/11)
http://www.ogc.gov.uk/index.asp OGC. (accessed on 2007/11)
http://disc-nt.cba.uh.edu/chin/PLSINTRO.HTM Chin, W.W. (1997). Overview of the PLS Method (accessed on 2008)
http://www.isoiec20000certification.com/index.asp ISO/IEC 20000 Certification web site. (accessed on 2008/5)
http://www.ulstek.com.tw/itil/page01.htm 精誠資訊,導入ITIL的好處為何? (accessed on 2008/5)
英文部分
Cater-Steel, A., & W.G., Tan. (2005). Implementation of ITIL in Australia: Progress and success factors. 2005 IT Governance International Conference.
Argote, L. (1999). Organizational learning: Creating, retaining, and transferring knowledge. Kluwer Academic: Boston, MA.
Banker, R.D., I.R. Bardhan, H. Chang, & S. Lin. (2006). Plant information systems, manufacturing capabilities, and plant performance. MIS Quarterly, 30: 315-337.
Barclay, D., R. Thompson, & C. Higgins, (1995) The Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach to Causal Modeling: Personal Computer Adoption and Use an Illustration, Technology Studies, 2: 285-309.
Barton, N. (2004). This year's model: Performance improvement complements IT best practices frameworks. CIO Magazine.
Bharadwaj A.S., V. Sambamurthy, & R.W. Zmud. (1999). IT capabilities: theoretical perspectives and empirical operationalization. Paper presented at International Conference on Information Systems.
Bharadwaj, A.S. (2000). A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 24: 169–196.
Bharadwaj, A.S., V. Sambamurthy, & R.W. Zmud. (2002). Firmwide IT capability: An empirical examination of the construct and its links to performance. Working paper, Department of Decision and Information Analysis, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Bogner, W.C., & P.S. Barr. (2000). Making sense in hypercompetitive environments: A cognitive explanation for the persistence of high velocity competition. Organization Science.
Brenner, M. (2006). Classifying ITIL processes: A taxonomy under tool support aspects. IEEE.
Chin, W. W. (1996). The measurement and meaning of IT usage: Reconciling recent discrepancies between self reported and computer recorded usage, Administrative Sciences Association of Canada - 24th Conference, IS Division Proceedings.
Chin, W. W. (1998a). The Partial Least Square Approach to Structural Equation Modeling. New Jersey. Modern Method fot Business Research. Publisher.
Chin, W. W. (1998b). Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling, MIS Quarterly, 22.
Cohen, M.A. & D. Levinthal. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128-152.
Collis, D.J. (1994). Research note: How valuable are organizational capabilities? Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 15: 143–152.
Eisenhardt, K.M. & J.A. Martin. (2000). Dynamic Capabilities: What are they?. Strategic Management Journal. Vol. 21, 1105-1121
Feeny, D. F., & L. P. Willcocks. (1998). Core IS capabilities for exploiting information technology. Sloan Management Review, 39: 9–21.
Fornell, C., & D. Larcker, (1981) Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Onobservable Variables and Measurement Eerror, Journal of Marketing Research, 18: 39-50.
Forrester Research. Andrew Bartels, Ellen Daley & Heidi Lo (2008). Global IT 2008 Market Outlook.
Fowler, S., A. King, S.J. Marsh & B. Victor. (2000). Beyond products: New strategic imperatives for developing competencies in dynamic environments. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 17: 357-377.
Garud, R. & P.R. Nayyar. (1994). Transformative capacity: Continual structuring by inter-temporal technology transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 365-386.
Hair, J. F., R. L. Tatham, R. E. Anderson and W. C. Black. (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed.), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Helfat, C.E. & M.A. Peteraf. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal. Vol. 24, 997-1010
Henderson, J.C. & H. Clark. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly.
Henderson, R. & I. Cockburn. (1994). Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal.
HP (2007). The ITIL Winning Strategy. Reproduced under license from OGC.
IBM & GMA(Grocery Manufacturers Association). (2006). 2006 GMA Information Technology Investment and Effectiveness Study.
itSMF. (2007). An Introductory Overview of ITIL V3. version 1.0
Karimi, J., T.M. Somers, & A. Bhattacherjee. (2007). The role of information systems resources in ERP capability building and business process outcomes. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24: 221-260.
Kashanchi, R. & J. Toland. (2006). Can ITIL contribute to IT/business alignment? An initial investigation. Wirtschaftsinformatik.
Keil, M., C.Y. Tan, K.K. Wei, & T. Saarinen. (2000) Cross-Cultural Study on Escalation of Commitment Behavior in Software Projects. MIS Quarterly, 24: 299-325.
Kohli, A.K. & B.J. Jaworski. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54: 1-18.
Kohli, A., B. Jaworski & A. Kumar. (1993). MARKOR: A measure of market orientation. Journal of Marketing Research, 30: 467-477.
Laudon, K.C. & J.P. Laudon. (2006). Management Information Systems – Managing The Digital Firm 10th. New Jersey. Pearson Education.
Martínez-Torres. (2006). A procedure to design a structural and measurement model of Intellectual Capital: An exploratory study. Information & Management, 43: 617-626.
Mata, F.J., W.L. Fuerst, & J.B. Barney. (1995). Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly, 19: 487–505.
Mintzberg, H. (1994). The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. Prentice Hall.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5: 14-37.
Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Pavlou, P.A., & O.A. El Sawy. (2005). Understanding the 'Black Box' of dynamic capabilities. Under a 3rd round of review in Management Science.
Pavlou, P.A., & O.A. El Sawy. (2006). From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of New Product Development. Information Systems Research, 17: 198-227
Pink Elephant. (2005). ITIL®, IT Governance & The Managed Service Provider (MSP).
Potgieter, B.C., J.H. Botha, & C. Lew. (2005). Evidence that use of the ITIL framework is effective. Paper presented at 18th Annual Conference of the National Advisory Committee on Computing Qualifications.
Ray, G., W. A. Muhanna, & J. B. Barney. (2005). Information technology and the performance of the customer service process: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly, 29: 625–642.
Ross, J., C. Beath, & M. Vitale. (1996). Develop long-term competitiveness through IT assets. Sloan Management Review, 38: 31–45.
Sallé, M. (2004). IT Service Management and IT Governance: review, comparative analysis and their impact on utility computing. Hewlett-Pakard Company.
Sherrie, Y. X., Izak B. (2006) The effects of personalization and familiarity on trust and adoption of recommendation agents. MIS Quarterly, 30: 941-960.
Taylor, S., D. Canon, & D. Wheeldon. (2007). Service Operation. TSO, London.
Taylor, S., G. Case, & G. Spalding. (2007). Continual Service Improvement. London. TSO.
Taylor, S., M. Iqbal, & M. Nieve. (2007). Service Strategy. London. TSO.
Taylor, S., S. Lacy, & I. Macfarlane. (2007). Service Transition. London. TSO.
Taylor, S., V. Lloyd, & C. Rudd. (2007). Service Design. London. TSO.
Teece, D.J., G. Pisano & A. Shuen. (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 509-533.
Tippins, M.J., & R.S. Sohi. (2003). IT competency and firm performance: Is organizational learning a missing link? Strategic Management Journal, 24: 745–761.
Turban, E., D. King, J. McKay, P. Marshall, J. Lee, D. Viehland. (2008). Electronic Commerce 2008 – A Managerial Perspective. New Jersey. Pearson Education.
Weick, K.E. & K.H. Roberts. (1993) Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 357-381.
Winter, S.G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal. Vol 24, 991-995.
Zahra, S.A. & G. George. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27: 185-203.
Zander, U. & B. Kogut (1995). Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities. Organization Science, 6: 76–92.
Zollo, M. & S.G. Winter. (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13: 339–351.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/37894-
dc.description.abstractITIL(Information Technology Infrastructure Library)在近幾年持續受到業界重視,並在2005年正式成為ISO 20000國際標準,其被視為IT投資的互補性資產,企業透過ITIL建立標準IT管理流程,串連與整合內外部紛雜的IT資源,促進這些IT資源被妥善的利用,微軟、IBM、HP、HSBC、P&G等著名企業都將ITIL視為必要的IT基礎建設,依賴資訊科技的企業對ITIL的重視可見一斑;然而在快速變遷的環境下,組織應該具有能取得市場與客戶需求的能力,並吸收、利用這些需求資訊將其轉化成實際可執行的日常作業,且逐漸建立與本身經驗相符的運作慣例來實踐這些需求,經由這些過程不斷地重組本身的資源與能力來面對動態環境以創造競爭優勢;因此以ITIL version 3五大核心為架構,探討各核心如何善用IT來實現上述過程就成為重要的議題。

本研究的目的是要瞭解ITIL在動態環境下如何協助組織重組本身的資源與能力來達到競爭優勢,以動態能力的觀點來剖析ITIL五大核心的價值,綜合各學者的論述嘗試將ITIL定義為發揮IT投資效益的「善用IT能力」,並試圖建立ITIL與動態能力之間的關係,且發展衡量ITIL核心的量表,本研究以Partial Least Square方法針對蒐集到的資料進行分析,發現ITIL核心分別對市場導向、吸收能力、協同能力與集體意識等四種組織能力存在正向的關係,企業若能瞭解此關係,就能透過ITIL補足本身在特定能力上的不足,建立面對環境動態的競爭優勢。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractITIL (Information Technology Infrastructure Library) has been announced as the ISO 20000 by International Organization for Standardization. ITIL is regarded as a complementary asset for IT investment. Through ITIL, enterprises will builde IT management processes to link and integrate internal and external IT resources. And these processes will enhance the enterprises to leverage IT resources. Many famous enterprises have viewed ITIL as essential IT infrastructure and advanced ITIL for a period of time, such as Microsoft, IBM, HP, HSBC and P&G etc. It shows that more and more IT-depedence enterprises put emphasis on ITIL. However, under the rapid-changing environment, enterprises should develope the capability to catch the demand of market and customers. And trying to absorb, utilize and transform the information into practical operations. Then, enterprises will build operational routines suitable to their own experience and history progressively. Through these processes, enterprises reconfigure resources and competences to face the dynamic environment and create competitive advantages. Therefore, the discussion of how ITIL version 3 implements the above-mentioned processes becomes an important issue.

The purpose of this research is to understand how ITIL assists enterprises to reconfigure their resources and competences under the dynamic environment from the dynamic capability view. From many literatures’ viewpoints, the research defines ITIL as the ”IT Leveraging Competence” and attempts to establish the model between ITIL and dynamic capability and also develops the measurement questionnaires of ITIL to help analyze accuracy of the model. Using Partial Least Square with data collected from itSMF, it shows that there exist positive relationships between ITIL cores and dynamic capability. When enterprises understand these relationships, they will achieve the capability to face the rapid-changing environment by focusing on what they are short of and complement the lack accordingly.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T15:49:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-97-R95725002-1.pdf: 1047505 bytes, checksum: eb070cf7e4a3b0154ffd0686c1773549 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2008
en
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章、 緒論 (1)
第一節、 研究背景與動機 (1)
第二節、 研究目的 (3)
第二章、文獻探討 (4)
第一節、 ITIL (4)
2.1.1、IT服務管理(IT Service Management, ITSM)與ITIL (4)
2.1.2、ITIL v3五大核心 (6)
第二節、 動態能力 (15)
2.2.1、動態能力的定義 (15)
2.2.2、動態能力的衡量構面 (24)
2.2.3、動態能力的提升 (26)
第三章、研究方法 (30)
第一節、 研究架構 (30)
第三節、 構面之定義與衡量 (36)
3.3.1、ITIL五大核心構面 (36)
3.3.2、動態能力構面 (40)
第四節、 研究對象與資料蒐集 (43)
第五節、 資料分析方式 (43)
第四章、資料分析與研究結果 (45)
第一節、 原始問卷信效度分析 (45)
第二節、 受訪者基本資料分析 (46)
4.2.1、公司變數 (46)
4.2.2、受訪者變數 (47)
第三節、 資料分析與結果 (49)
4.3.1、衡量模型 (Measurement Model) (49)
4.3.2、結構模型 (Structure Model) (59)
第五章、結論與建議 (63)
第一節、研究結論 (63)
第二節、研究貢獻 (65)
第三節、研究限制 (66)
第四節、後續研究之建議 (66)
參考文獻 (68)
附錄 (73)
表目錄
表2.1、傳統IT管理與ITSM的差異 (5)
表2.2、動態能力的定義 (19)
表2.3、動態能力原始問項 (25)
表2.4、促進動態能力提升之方式 (29)
表3.1、動態能力與ITIL之關係表 (34)
表3.2、研究假設 (35)
表3.3、服務策略構面之衡量問項 (37)
表3.4、服務設計構面之衡量問項 (37)
表3.5、服務移轉構面之衡量問項 (38)
表3.6、服務作業構面之衡量問項 (39)
表3.7、服務持續改善構面之衡量問項 (39)
表3.8、市場導向構面之衡量問項 (40)
表3.9、吸收能力構面之衡量問項 (41)
表3.10、協同能力構面之衡量構面 (42)
表3.11、集體意識構面之衡量問項 (42)
表3.3、組能力構面之衡量問項 (43)
表4.2、問卷受訪者基本資料:公司變數 (47)
表4.3、問卷受訪者基本資料:受訪者變數 (48)
表4.4、第一次因素分析結果(EFA) (50)
表4.5、刪除SO_6後之第二次因素分析結果(EFA) (52)
表4.6、問卷精簡後之編碼與問項 (55)
表4.7、CFA結果整理與問項顯著性檢定 (57)
表4.8、問卷精簡後各構面之信度指標 (58)
表4.9、效度分析表 (59)
表4.1、本研究模型之假設檢定整理 (60)
圖目錄
圖1.1、企業執行者對IT投資裹足不前的理由 (2)
圖2.1、ITIL V3核心架構 (6)
圖2.2、策略規劃與控制流程 (7)
圖2.3、服務設計過程 (8)
圖2.4、CONTINUAL SERVICE IMPROVEMENT MODEL (CSI MODEL) (14)
圖2.5、動態能力本質 (16)
圖2.6、區隔動態能力與一般功能性能力 (18)
圖2.7、能力生命週期 (18)
圖2.8、描繪動態能力「黑盒子」之架構 (21)
圖2.9、描述動態能力「黑盒子」的形成性二階模型 (21)
圖2.10、動態能力影響競爭優勢的模型 (24)
圖2.11、學習、動態能力與作業慣例 (26)
圖2.12、IT能力創造競爭優勢的完整模型 (29)
圖3.1、ITIL建構動態能力之模式 (31)
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subjectISO 20000zh_TW
dc.subject動態能力zh_TW
dc.subjectITILzh_TW
dc.subject善用IT能力zh_TW
dc.subjectITILen
dc.subjectIT Leveraging Competenceen
dc.subjectDynamic Capabilityen
dc.subjectISO 20000en
dc.title利用ITIL建構企業動態能力之研究zh_TW
dc.titleThe Research of Buliding Enterprise Dynamic Capability through ITILen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear96-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee李國光,陳鴻基
dc.subject.keywordITIL,ISO 20000,動態能力,善用IT能力,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordITIL,ISO 20000,Dynamic Capability,IT Leveraging Competence,en
dc.relation.page76
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2008-06-27
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept資訊管理學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:資訊管理學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-97-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
1.02 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved