Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 財務金融學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/37668
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor陳業寧
dc.contributor.authorYu-Hung Chenen
dc.contributor.author陳聿宏zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-13T15:37:45Z-
dc.date.available2008-07-16
dc.date.copyright2008-07-16
dc.date.issued2008
dc.date.submitted2008-07-09
dc.identifier.citation林毅夫、蔡昉、李周 (2000),《中國國有企業改革》,聯經。
陳生絡 (2004),《中國國有企業的產權變革與黨的領導》,韋伯文化。
劉小玄 (2005),《轉軌過程中的民營化》,社會科學文獻出版所。
Atanasov, V. (2005), “How Much Value can Blockholders Tunnel? Evidence from the Bulgarian Mass Privatization Auctions,” Journal of Financial Economics, 76(1), 191-234.
Black, B., R. Kraakman and A. Tarassova (2000), “Russian Privatization and Corporate Governance: What Went Wrong,” Stanford Law Review, 44(147/148), 29-117.
Boubakri, N. and J. C. Cosset (1998), “The Financial and Operating Performance of Newly Privatized Firms: Evidence from Developing Countries,” Journal of Finance, 53(3), 1081-1110.
Boycko, M., A. Shleifer and R. W. Vishny (1996), “A Theory of Privatisation,” The Economic Journal, 106(435), 309-319.
Caves, D. W. and L. R. Christensen (1980), “The Relative Efficiency of Public and Private Firms in a Competitive Environment: The Case of Canadian Railroads,” The Journal of Political Economy, 88(5), 958-976.
Cornelli, F. and D. D. Li (1997), “Large Shareholders, Private Benefits of Control, and Optimal Schemes of Privatization,” The RAND Journal of Economics, 28(4), 585-604.
Cuervo, A. and B. Villalonga (2000), “Explaining the Variance in the Performance Effects of Privatization,” The Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 581-590.
Denis, D. K. and J. J. McConnel (2003), “International Corporate Governance,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(l), 1-36.
Dewenter, K. and P. H. Malatesta (2001), “State-Owned and Privately-Owned Firms: An Empirical Analysis of Profitability, Leverage, and Labor Intensity,” American Economic Review, 91(1), 320-334.
Easterwood, J. C., R. F. Singer, A. Seth and D. F. Lang (1994), “Controlling the Conflict of Interest in Management Buyouts,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76(3), 512-522.
Fluck, Z., K. John and S. A. Ravid (2007), “Privatization as an Agency Problem: Auctions versus Private Negotiations,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 31(9), 2730-2750.
Haskel, J. and A. Sanchis (1995), “Privatisation and X-Inefficiency: A Bargaining Approach,” The Journal of Industrial Economics, 43(3), 301-321.
Hite, G. and M. Vetsuypens (1989), “Management Buyouts of Divisions and Shareholder Wealth,” Journal of Finance, 44(4), 953-970.
Kaplan, S. (1989), “The Effects of Management Buyouts on Operating Performance and Value,” Journal of Financial Economics, 24(2), 217-254.
La Porta, R. and F. Lopez-de-Silanes (1999), “Benefits of Privatization: Evidence from Mexico,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(4), 1193-1242.
Lopez-de-Silanes, F. (1997), “Determinants of Privatization Prices,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 965-1025.
Lowenstein, L. (1985), “Management Buyouts,” Columbia Law Review, 85, 730-784.
Majumdar, S. K. (1998), “Assessing Comparative Efficiency of the State-Owned Mixed and Private Sectors in Indian Industry,” Public Choice, 96(1/2), 1-24.
Megginson, W. L. and J. M. Netter (2001), “From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization,” Journal of Economic Literature, 39(2), 321-389.
Shleifer, A. (1998), “State versus Private Ownership,” The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(4), 133-150.
Shleifer, A. and R. W. Vishny (1997), “A Survey of Corporate Governance,” The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737-783.
Singh, H. (1990), “Management Buyouts: Distinguishing Characteristics and Operating Changes Prior to Public Offering,” Strategic Management Journal, 11(4), 111-129.
Smith, A. J. (1990), “Corporate Ownership Structure and Performance: The Case of Management Buyouts,” Journal of Financial Economics, 27(1), 143-164.
Thompson, S. and M. Wright (1995), “Corporate Governance: The Role of Restructuring Transactions,” The Economic Journal, 105(430), 690-730.
Tirole, J. (2001), “Corporate Governance,” Econometrica, 69(1), 1-35.
Vickers, J. and G. Yarrow (1991), “Economic Perspectives on Privatization,” The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(2), 111-132.
Wright, M., N. Wilson, K. Robbie and C. Ennew (1996), “An Analysis of Management Buy-Out Failure,” Managerial and Decision Economics, 17(1), 57-70.
Wright, M., R. E. Hoskisson, L. W. Busenitz and J. Dial (2000), “Entrepreneurial Growth through Privatization: The Upside of Management Buyouts,” The Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 591-901.
Wright, M., S. Thompson and K. Robbie (1992), “Venture Capital and Management-Led Leveraged Buy-Out: A European Perspective,” Journal of Business Venturing, 7(1), 47-71.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/37668-
dc.description.abstract本文建構一理論模型探討有關國營企業的民營化問題。本文發現:當政府沒有辦法藉由監督或是營運的機制阻止經理人在民營化前的掏空行為,則將企業以管理層收購的方式民營化會比以拍賣的方式得到更高的賣價。當政府可以藉由營運的機制阻止經理人的掏空行為,則採用拍賣和管理層收購的方式將無差異。但是當政府訂定管理層收購的價格不具效率時,則採用拍賣可能會比管理層收購的方式得到較高的賣價。
在民營化的討論中,國營企業的經營效率總是比民營企業低。將國營企業民營化確實可以改善經營的效率,但是民營化的過程會遇到經理人掏空企業的代理問題。如果掏空行為的代理問題過於嚴重,民營企業所帶來的經營效率將會被掏空行為所帶來的無謂損失抵銷掉,因此國營企業是否需要民營化必須考慮政府處理民營化的過程是否同樣不具效率。本文認為,只有當經營效率與民營化效率都被確實考量後,執行民營化才能真正發揮民營企業所能帶來的正面功能。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis thesis studies the topics related to the state-owned enterprises and the privatization of the state-owned enterprises. It discovers first that, when the government cannot prevent the manager from hollowing out the assets of the enterprises before the privatization by the mechanism of surveillance or operation, the way of privatization by management buy-out compared to auction will obtain a higher selling price. Second, when the government may prevent the manager from hollowing out the assets of the enterprise by the mechanism of operation, the way of privatization by management buy-out and auction will be indifferent. Finally, when the government is inefficient of deciding the price of the management buy-out, the way of privatization by auction compared to management buy-out will obtain a higher selling price.
In the discussion of privatization, the operation of the state-owned enterprises is thought of much more inefficient than the private-owned ones. The privatization of the state-owned enterprises may effectively improve the operating efficiency, but the process of privatization may run into the agency problem of the manager hollowing out the assets of the enterprises. If the problem of the hollowing out the assets is too serious, it will eliminate the operating efficiency of the private-owned enterprises. Therefore to decide whether the state-owned enterprises need to be privatized, it must be considered if the process of privatization in government is efficient. This thesis finds, only after the operating efficiency and the privatization efficiency are all taken into account, the privatization can show the advantage which the private-owned enterprises can bring.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T15:37:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-97-R94723049-1.pdf: 380589 bytes, checksum: 09487df0e672a18e1b9be0ec269ef6e3 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2008
en
dc.description.tableofcontents謝辭 i
中文摘要 ii
英文摘要 iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 v
第一章、前言 1
第二章、基本模型 5
第一節、民營企業經營模式 5
第二節、國營企業經營模式 7
第三節、民營化過程 8
第三章、模型分析 11
第一節、民營企業經營模式的均衡 11
第二節、國營企業經營模式的均衡 13
第三節、經理人只需決定是否掏空企業 17
第四節、經理人決定是否掏空企業後尚需決定努力程度 23
第四章、模型的延伸 31
第一節、政府具有調整薪資的權力 31
第二節、政府在管理層收購下的定價不具效率 33
第三節、政府是否應該將企業民營化 34
第五章、結論 38
參考文獻 40
附錄 43
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title國營企業民營化方式之探討-拍賣或管理層收購?zh_TW
dc.titlePrivatization of State-Owned Enterprises-Auction versus Management Buy-Out?en
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear96-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee陳明賢,陳明園
dc.subject.keyword民營化,國營企業,管理層收購,拍賣,代理問題,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordPrivatization,State-Owned Enterprises,Management Buy-Out,Auction,Agency Problem,en
dc.relation.page58
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2008-07-10
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept財務金融學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:財務金融學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-97-1.pdf
  目前未授權公開取用
371.67 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved