Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 國際企業學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/37374
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor林修葳
dc.contributor.authorLi-Chi Yehen
dc.contributor.author葉立錡zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-13T15:25:59Z-
dc.date.available2008-07-24
dc.date.copyright2008-07-24
dc.date.issued2008
dc.date.submitted2008-07-17
dc.identifier.citation1. Akgiray, V., 1989, “Conditional Heteroscedasticity in Time Series of Stock Returns: Evidence and Forecasts,” Journal of Business, 62(1), 55-80.
2. Apergis, N. and S. Eleptheriou, 2001, “Stock Returns and Volatility: Evidence from the Athens Stock Market Index,” Journal of Economics and Finance, 25(1), 50-61.
3. Baillie, R. T. and R. P. DeGennaro, 1990, “Stock Returns and Volatility,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 25(2), 203-214.
4. Barber, B. M., Y. T. Lee and Y. J. Liu, 2005, “Who Loses from Trade? Evidence from Taiwan,” University of California at Davis, Unpublished Working Paper.
5. Barclay, M. J. and J. B. Warner, 1993, “Stealth Trading and Volatility: Which Trades Move Prices?,” Journal of Financial Economics, 34(3), 281-305.
6. Bessembinder, H. and P. J. Seguin, 1993, “Price Volatility, Trading Volume, and Market Depth: Evidence from Futures Markets,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 28(1), 21-39.
7. Bollerslev, T., 1986, “Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity,” Journal of Econometrics, 31(2), 307–327.
8. Bollerslev, T., 1987, “A Conditionally Heteroskedastic Time Series Model for Speculative Prices and Rates of Return,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(3), 542-547.
9. Bollerslev, T., R. Y. Chou and K. F. Kroner, 1992, “ARCH Modeling in Finance-A Review of the Theory and Empirical Evidence,” Journal of Econometrics, 52(1-2), 5-59.
10. Brown, P., D. Walsh and A. Yuen, 1997, “The Interaction between Order Imbalance and Stock Price,” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 5(5), 539-557.
11. Chakravarty, S., 2001, “Stealth-Trading: Which Traders’ Trades Move Stock Prices?,” Journal of Financial Economics, 61(2), 289-307.
12. Chan, K. and W. M. Fong, 2000, “Trade Size, Order Imbalance, and the Volatility–Volume Relation,” Journal of Financial Economics, 57(2), 247-273.
13. Cheng, T. Y., C. H. Lin and S. S. Juang, 2007, “Who is the Winner? Trading Behavior and Performance for Major Types of Traders-Evidence from Taiwan's Futures Market,” Asia Pacific Management Review, 12(1), 13-21.
14. Chopra, N., J. Lakonishok and J. R. Ritter, 1992, “Measuring Abnormal Performance: Do Stocks Overreact?,” Journal of Financial Economics, 31(2), 235-268.
15. Chordia, T. and A. Subrahmanyam, 2004, “Order Imbalance and Individual Stock Returns: Theory and Evidence,” Journal of Financial Economics, 72(3), 485-518.
16. Chordia, T., R. Roll and A. Subrahmanyam, 2002, “Order Imbalance, Liquidity, and Market Returns,” Journal of Financial Economics, 65(1), 111-130.
17. Ciner, C. 2002, “The Stock Price-Volume Linkage on the Toronto Stock Exchange: Before and After Automation,” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 19(4), 335-349.
18. Copeland, T. E., 1976, “A Model of Asset Trading under the Assumption of Sequential Information Arrival,” Journal of Finance, 31(4), 1149-1168.
19. DeBondt, W. F. M. and R. H. Thaler, 1985, “Does the Stock Market Overreact?,” Journal of Finance, 40(3), 793-805.
20. DeBondt, W. F. M. and R. H. Thaler, 1987, “Further Evidence on Investor Overreaction and Stock Market Seasonality,” Journal of Finance, 42(3), 557-580.
21. Engle, R. F., 1982, “Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation,” Econometrica, 50(4), 987-1007.
22. Epps, T. W. and M. L. Epps, 1976, “The Stochastic Dependence of Security Price Changes and Transaction Volumes: Implications for the Mixture-of-Distributions Hypothesis,” Econometrica, 44(2), 305-321.
23. Foster, F. D. and S. Viswanathan, 1994, “Strategic Trading with Asymmetrically Informed Traders and Long-Lived Information,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 29(4), 499-518.
24. French, K., 1980, “Stock Returns and the Weekend Effect,” Journal of Financial Economics, 8(1), 55-69.
25. Gallant, A. R., P. E. Rossi and G. Tauchen, 1992, “Stock Prices and Volume,” Review of Financial Studies, 5(2), 199-242.
26. Garcia P., R. M. Leuthold and H. Zapata, 1986, “Lead–Lag Relationships between Trading Volume and Price Variability: New Evidence,” Journal of Futures Markets, 6(1), 1–10.
27. Gibbons, M. R. and P. Hess, 1981, “Day of the Week Effects and Asset Returns,” Journal of Business, 54(4), 579-596.
28. Glosten, L. R., R. Jagannathan and D. E. Runkle, 1993, “On the Relation between the Expected Value and the Volatility of the Nominal Excess Return on Stocks,” Journal of Finance, 48(5), 1779-1801.
29. Grammatikos T. and A. Saunders, 1986, “Futures Price Variability: A Test of Maturity and Volume Effects,” Journal of Business, 59(2), 319-330.
30. Granger, C. W. J., 1969, “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods,” Econometrica, 37(3), 424-438.
31. Grinblatt M., S. Titman and R. Wermers, 1995, “Momentum Investment Strategies, Portfolio Performance, and Herding: A Study of Mutual Fund Behavior,” American Economic Review, 85(5), 1088-1105.
32. Gulen H. and S. Mayhew, 2000, “Stock Index Futures Trading and Volatility in International Equity Markets,” Journal of Futures Markets, 20(7), 661 – 685.
33. Harris, L., 1987, “Transaction Data Tests of the Mixture of Distributions Hypothesis,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 22(2), 127-141.
34. Hiemstra, C. and J. D. Jones, 1994, “Testing for Linear and Nonlinear Granger Causality in the Stock Price-Volume Relation,” Journal of Finance, 49(5), 1639-1664.
35. Jain, P. C. and G. Joh, 1988, “The Dependence between Hourly Prices and Trading Volume,“ Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 23(3), 269-283.
36. Jennings, R. H., L. T. Starks and J.C. Fellingham, 1981, “An Equilibrium Model of Asset Trading with Sequential Information Arrival,” Journal of Finance, 36(1), 143-161.
37. Karpoff, J. M., 1987, “The Relation Between Price Changes and Trading Volume: A Survey,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 22(1), 109-126.
38. Kyle, A. S., 1985, “Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading,” Econometrica, 53(6), 1315-1335.
39. Lamoureux, C. G. and W. D. Lastrapes, 1990, “Heteroskedasticity in Stock Return Data: Volume versus GARCH Effects,” Journal of Finance, 45(1), 221-229.
40. Lee, B. S. and O. M. Rui, 2002, “The Dynamic Relationship between Stock Returns and Trading Volume: Domestic and Cross-country Evidence,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 26(1), 51-78.
41. Lee, C. F. and O. M. Rui, 2000, “Does Trading Volume Contain Information to Predict Stock Returns? Evidence from China's Stock Markets,” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 14(4), 341-360.
42. Lehman, B., 1990, “Fads, Martingales, and Market Efficiency,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105(1), 1-28.
43. McInish, T. H. and R. A. Wood, 1991, “Hourly Returns, Volume, Trade Size and Number of Trades,” Journal of Financial Research, 14(4), 303-315.
44. Morgan, I. G., 1976, “Stock Prices and Heteroskedasticity,” Journal of Business, 49(4), 496-508.
45. Najand M. and K. Yung, 1991, “A GARCH Examination of the Relationship between Volume and Price Variability in Futures Markets,” Journal of Futures Markets, 11(5), 613–621.
46. Nam, K., C. S. Pyun, and S. L. Avard, 2001, “Asymmetric Reverting Behavior of Short-Horizon Stock Returns: An Evidence of Stock Market Overreaction,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 25, 807-824.
47. Rahman S., C. Lee and K. P. Ang, 2002, “Intraday Return Volatility Process: Evidence from NASDAQ Stocks,” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 19(2), 155-180.
48. Saatcioglu, K. and L. T. Starks, 1998, “The Stock Price–Volume Relationship in Emerging Stock Markets: the Case of Latin America,” International Journal of Forecasting, 14(2), 215-225.
49. Schwert, G. W., P. J. Seguin, 1990, “Heteroskedasticity in Stock Returns,” Journal of Finance, 45(4), pp. 1129-1155.
50. Smirlock, M. and L. Starks, 1988, “An Empirical Analysis of the Stock Price-Volume Relationship,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 12(1), 31-41.
51. Tauchen, G. and M. Pitts, 1983, “The Price Variability-Volume Relationship on Speculative Markets,” Econometrica, 51(2), 485-505.
52. Wermers R., 1999, “Mutual Fund Herding and the Impact on Stock Prices,” Journal of Finance, 54(2), 581-622.
53. Westerfield, R., 1977, “The Distribution of Common Stock Price Changes: An Application of Transactions Time and Subordinated Stochastic Models,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 12(5), 743-765.
54. Xu C. K., 2000, “The Microstructure of the Chinese Stock Market,” China Economic Review, 11(1), 79-97.
55. Zarowin, P., 1990, “Size, Seasonality and Stock Market Overreaction,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 25(1), 113-125.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/37374-
dc.description.abstract本研究主要探討預期與未預期機構投資人買賣單不平衡對於股價報酬變動的影響,以進一步研究市場對機構投資人買賣單不平衡是否存在過度反應現象,以及機構投資人的買賣超衝擊對股價報酬影響。本研究以實證方式證明機構投資人在交易偽裝行為下,日買賣超具有序列相關的現象,而非過去學術界所認定買賣超之期望值為零之假設。本研究進一步利用此交易行為,將機構投資人買賣超分作預期以及未預期之部分,發現市場對於機構投資人買賣超具有過度反應的現象,且機構投資人未預期買賣超對於報酬變動的解釋能力相當強。
本研究也以實證方式,證明在台灣股票市場中,機構投資人被認定具有資訊優勢且其他投資人經常參考其交易行為下,機構投資人之買賣單不平衡與股票報酬的相關性比傳統的價量關係密切。本研究也發現當期機構投資人買賣超與股票報酬及報酬變異之間呈現正相關,且在控制財報公布日、股利宣告日及債券發行宣告日等重要基本分析資訊時點後,機構投資人能夠事先分析資訊並且進行交易,進而影響股票報酬。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis article examines the influence of expected and unexpected order imbalance on stock price changes to investigate the market reaction toward institutional investors’ order imbalance and the impact of net purchase surprise in Taiwan’s stock market. We posit and show that the net purchases of institutional investors are serially correlated due to camouflage behavior and the conditional expected value of net purchase is not zero as conventionally considered in empirical papers. Utilizing this characteristic, we separate the net purchases into expected and unexpected components and document that market participants tend to overreact to institutional investors’ trades and the order imbalance surprises explain most of the variability of price changes.
We also verify that, consistent with the notion that the institutional investors may be better informed from their deliberate analysis and the market tends to react to their trades, the correlation between order imbalance and returns is likely to be stronger than price-volume relationship in Taiwan’s stock market. Furthermore, we examine the impact of order imbalance on returns and find that the contemporary order imbalances are positively associated with price changes and return volatility. Moreover, after controlling the dates of the release of material fundamental information, our empirical results show that the institutional investors well incorporate new information and lead the market price changes.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T15:25:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-97-R95724059-1.pdf: 544387 bytes, checksum: 1673623b4101a103a843f95085251d32 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2008
en
dc.description.tableofcontentsContents
Chapter 1 Motive and Purpose 1
1.1 Introduction 1
1.2 Research Motive 2
1.3 Research Purposes 4
Chapter 2 Literature Review 7
2.1 Price-volume Relationship 7
2.2 Information Asymmetry 9
2.3 Order Imbalance 10
2.4 Overreaction 10
2.5 Linkage of Past Studies in this Research 11
Chapter 3 Methodology 14
3.1 Data 14
3.2 Descriptive Statistics of the Data 15
3.3 Research Process 16
Chapter 4 Lead-lag Relationship 18
4.1 Empirical Models 18
4.2 Empirical Results for Lead-lag Relationship 21
Chapter 5 Relationship between Return and Order Imbalance 27
5.1 Correlation between Order Imbalance and Returns 27
5.2 Interaction between Order Imbalance and Volatility-volume Relationship 34
5.3 Information Incorporation of Institutional Investors 38
Chapter 6 Overreaction of Market Participants 45
6.1 Regression Models 45
6.2 Empirical Results 49
6.3 Follow-up Analysis 60
Chapter 7 Conclusion 69
Appendix 72
Appendix I: Composition of Sample Firms 72
Appendix II: Statistics for Stock Return Distribution 75
Appendix III: Institutional Investors’ Net Purchase Statistics 78
Appendix IV: Part of Article Three of Taiwan Stock Exchange Corporation Procedures for Verification and Disclosure of Material Information of Listed Companies 81
Reference 82
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject機構投資人zh_TW
dc.subject買賣單不平衡zh_TW
dc.subject資訊不對稱zh_TW
dc.subject偽裝行為zh_TW
dc.subject過度反應zh_TW
dc.subjectOrder Imbalanceen
dc.subjectInformation Asymmetryen
dc.subjectInstitutional Investorsen
dc.subjectOverreactionen
dc.subjectCamouflage Behavioren
dc.title機構投資人預期與未預期買賣超衝擊
—新資訊反應及過度反應修正
zh_TW
dc.titleThe Impact of Expected and Unexpected Net Purchase of Institutional Investors—Reaction to Innovation and Correction for Overreactionen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear96-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee楊聲勇,李志偉
dc.subject.keyword買賣單不平衡,機構投資人,資訊不對稱,偽裝行為,過度反應,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordOrder Imbalance,Institutional Investors,Information Asymmetry,Camouflage Behavior,Overreaction,en
dc.relation.page86
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2008-07-18
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept國際企業學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:國際企業學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-97-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
531.63 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved