請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/37237完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林裕彬 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yen-Tan Wang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 王彥覃 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T15:22:10Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2011-07-24 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2008-07-24 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2008-07-21 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文部分
1. 中華發展綜合研究院(2006)，新店市志，新店市文史館。Available: http://library.sindian.gov.tw/tw/record/page.asp?record_id=14 2. 史瓊雯(2003)，應用景觀生態計量方法探討集水區河川沿岸土地利用變遷－以德基水庫集水區為例，中國文化大學地學研究所地理組碩士論文。 3. 石豐銘(2007)，應用HEC-1水文模式探討福山一號集水區之降雨－逕流關係，國立臺灣大學森林環境暨資源學系碩士論文。 4. 何錦杭(2006)，一個以CA為基礎之永續城鄉土地劃設支援模式，國立成功大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文。 5. 吳振發(2006)，土地利用變遷及景觀生態評估方法之建立，國立台北大學都市計劃研究所博士論文。 6. 吳振發與林裕彬(2006)，汐止市土地利用時空間變遷模式，都市與計劃，33(3)：231-259。 7. 李光敦、洪夢秋、林怡廷與張進鑫(2006)，集水區降雨逕流歷程之連續性模擬，農業工程學報，第52卷第2期。 8. 汪禮國(1997)，細胞自動體模式(Cellular Automata)與都市空間演化，國立中興大學法商學院都市計劃研究所碩士論文。 9. 肖篤寧(1999)，論現代景觀科學的形成與發展，地理科學，19(4)：1-5。 10. 周天穎、簡甫任、雷祖強(2003)，都市地區土地利用變遷量化分析之研究，台灣土地研究，第6期，第1卷，第105-130頁。 11. 林士弘(2002)，結合宮格自動機與地理資訊系統在台北盆地土地使用變遷模擬之研究，國立臺灣大學土木工程學研究所碩士論文。 12. 林俐玲、杜怡德、何宜娟(2002)，應用農業非點源污染模式(AGNPS)評估坡地開發泥砂產量，水土保持學報，34(3)：165-176。 13. 林裕彬、吳振發、鄧東波(2004)，汐止市土地利用時空間變遷模式，都市與計劃，31(3)：239-268。 14. 孫志鴻(2002)，國土規劃與土地區位之研究-總計畫：以台北都會區為例(I)，國科會專案研究計劃成果報告（NSC90-2621-Z-002-020），台灣大學地理環境資源學系。 15. 孫志鴻(2003)，國土規劃與土地區位之研究-總計畫：以台北都會區為例(II)，國科會專案研究計劃成果報告（NSC91-2621-Z-002-017），台灣大學地理環境資源學系。 16. 孫志鴻(2004)，國土規劃與土地利用模擬之研究-總計畫暨子計畫一：以台北都會區為例(III)，國科會專案研究計劃成果報告（NSC92-2621-Z-002-007），台灣大學地理環境資源學系。 17. 張永葵(2006)，應用GIS與細胞自動機(CA)模擬都市空間之擴張-以宜蘭平原為例，中國文化大學地學研究所地理組碩士論文。 18. 梁治平與周興(2007)，貴港市土地利用動態變化分析及用地預測，資源開發與市場，23卷9期(2007/09)：795-798。 19. 逢甲大學地理資訊系統中心(1998)，區域土地使用計畫管理系統，內政部營建署委託研究。 20. 陳文福與廖信誠(1996)，都市邊緣地區土地利用變遷之逕流特性研究－以景美溪集水區為例，中華水土保持學報，27(4)：311-324。 21. 陳志閣(2004)都市土地利用模擬模型之建構與土地使用分區影響之分析，國立台北大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文。 22. 陳建豪(2007)，曾文水庫大埔水文站流量之研究，國立成功大學水利及海洋工程研究所碩士論文。 23. 陳超群(2006)，個體施為決策之土地利用變遷研究－雲林沿海魚塭養殖之個案，國立臺灣大學地理環境資源研究所碩士論文。 24. 童慶斌、林裕彬、徐貴新、洪念民、魏敏裕(2004)，環境影響評估推估模式與環境基準之建立，行政院環保署委託計畫，EPA-93-U1E1-02-101。 25. 童慶斌、楊奕岑(2004)，氣候變遷對台灣河川生態之衝擊，全球變遷通訊雜誌第四十四期，pp. 18-23。 26. 黃書禮與蔡靜如(2000)，臺北盆地土地利用變遷趨勢之研究，都市與計劃，第27期，第1卷，第1-23頁。 27. 經濟部水利署水文水資源資料管理供應系統，Available： http://gweb.wra.gov.tw/wrweb/。 28. 詹瑋(2002)，文山地區發展研究之歷史(1761~1945)，國立政治大學歷史系研究部博士論文。 29. 詹瑋等人編纂(2006)，文山區志，台北市文山區公所編製。Available: http://www.ws.taipei.gov.tw/site/41f5d1af/46cbd42b/47231f73/files/index.htm 30. 鄔建國(2003)，景觀生態學－格局、過程、尺度與等級，五南圖書出版股份有限公司，初版一刷。 31. 臺北大眾捷運股份有限公司網站。Available: http://www.trtc.com.tw/c/index.asp 32. 臺北縣市各戶政事務所網站之人口統計，臺北市文山區一、二、臺北市南港區戶政事務所網站；臺北縣深坑鄉、石碇鄉、新店市、坪林鄉、汐止市、平溪鄉戶政事務所網站。 33. 臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所(2002)，「修訂台北縣綜合發展計畫」地區發展計畫，內政部營建署委託研究案。Available: http://gisapsrv01.cpami.gov.tw/cpis/cprpts/Taipei_county_1/INDEX.HTM 34. 劉正川與李彥樺(2006)，不同時期之開發度對集水區逕流模擬之研究，中華水土保持學報，37(2)：125-142. 35. 歐信宏(2001)，HEC-HMS降雨-逕流模式應用之研究，國立成功大學水利及海洋工程研究所碩士論文。 36. 鄭皆達、林維侃、蘇瑞榮(1994)，應用GIS及HEC-1水文模式探討台灣中部上游集水區降雨逕流之關係，中華水土保持學報，第二十五卷，第三期：第143-150頁。 37. 鄭祈全、吳治達、王素芬(2005)，應用Markov和Logit模式監測地景變遷之研究。台灣林業科學，20(1)：29-36。 38. 鄧東波(2001)，從景觀生態學觀點探討都市綠地－以台北市信義計畫區為例，中國文化大學地學研究所碩士論文。 39. 黎明工程顧問公司(2005)，景美溪河川環境營造計畫規劃，經濟部水利署第十河川局出版研究報告。 40. 盧光輝與黃榆茗(2004)，新店寶橋集水區土地利用變遷對地表逕流之影響，華岡農科學報第十四期，民國九十三年出版，中國文化大學農學院印行。 41. 賴進貴、王偉力、紀明德(2000)，從空間演化觀點探討土地利用變遷，地理學與永續發展研討會論文集，台北：中國地理學會，1：67-79。 42. 謝啟賢、蔡博文、張康聰(2007)，養殖土地利用變遷預測模式之建立，地理學報，第四十七期：1-18。 43. 簡文謙(2003)，以GIS及非規則空間CA為基礎的都市土地使用模擬方法，逢甲大學建築及都市計畫研究所碩士論文。 44. 顏怡璇(2003)，運用細胞自動化理論模擬森林地景變遷之研究，東海大學景觀系碩士論文。 二、英文部分 45. Agarwal, C., Green, J. M., Grove, J. M., Evans, T. P., Schweik, C. M., 2002. A review and assessment of land-use change models: dynamics of space, time, and human choice. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-297. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station. 61 pp. 46. Batty, M. and Howes, D. Remote sensing and urban analysis. In Predicting temporal patterns in urban development from remote imagery; Donnay, J.P., Barnsley, M. J., Longley, P. A., Eds.; Taylor and Francis: London and New York, 2001; pp. 185-204. 47. Beighley, R. E., John M. M., and Thomas D., 2003. Impacts of California’s Climatic Regimes and Coastal Land Use Change on Streamflow Characteristics. Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA), 39(6): 1419-1433. 48. Candau, J., 2002. Temporal calibration sensitivity of the SLEUTH urban growth model. Master thesis, Department of Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA. 49. Candau, J., Rasmussen, S. and Clarke K.C., 2000. A coupled cellular automaton model for land use/land cover dynamics. 4th International Conference on Integrating GIS and Environmental Modeling(GIS/EM4): Problems, Prospects and Research Needs. Banff, Alberta, Canada, September2 - 8, 2000. 50. Castella , Jean-C., Kam, S. P., Quang, D. D., Verburg, P.H., Hoanh, C. T., 2007. Combining top-down and bottom-up modelling approaches of land use/ cover change to support public policies: Application to sustainable management of natural resources in northern Vietnam. Land Use Policy 24, 531-545. 51. Castella Jean-C. and Verburg, P. H., 2007. Combination of process-oriented and pattern-oriented models of land-use change in a mountain area of Vietnam. Ecological Modelling, 202, 410-420. 52. Chow, V. T., Maidment, D. R., and Mays, L. W., 1988. Applied hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. 53. Clarke, K. C. and Gaydos, L., 1998. Loose-coupling a cellular automaton model and GIS: long-term urban growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore. International Journal for Geographical Information Science, 12: 699-714. 54. Clarke, K. C., 1997. Land use modeling with Deltatrons. The Land Use Modeling Conference, Sioux Falls, South Dakota. June 5-6th. 55. Clarke, K. C., Hoppen, S., and Gaydos, L. (1997). A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 1997, 24: 247-261. 56. Clarke, K. C., Hoppen, S., Gaydos, L., 1996. Methods and techniques for rigorous calibration of a cellular automaton model of urban growth. Proceedings of the Third International Conference/Workshop on Integrating Geographic Information Systems and Environmental Modeling. Santa Fe, NM, January 21-25. 57. Clarke, Keith C., Hoppen, Stacy, Gaydos, Leonard J., 1998. Methods and techniques for rigorous calibration of a cellular automaton model of urban growth. Available: http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/conf/SANTA_FE_CD-ROM/sf_papers/clarke_keith/clarkeetal.html. 58. DiBari, J. N., 2007. Evaluation of five landscape-level metrics for measuring the effects of urbanization on landscape structure: the case of Tucson, Arizona, USA. Landscape and Urban Planning, 79: 308–313. 59. Dietzel, C. and Clarke, K.C., 2004. Replication of spatio-temporal land use patterns at three levels of aggregation by an urban cellular automata. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3305: 523-532. 60. Dietzel, C. and Clarke, K.C., 2006. The effect of disaggregating land use categories in cellular automata during model calibration and forecasting. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 30: 78–101. 61. Dietzel, C. and Clarke, K.C., 2007. Toward optimal calibration of the SLEUTH land use change model. Transactions in GIS, 11(1): 29-45. 62. Dramstard, W. E., J.D. Olson and R.T.T. Forman. 1996. Landscape Principles in Landscape Architecture and Land-use Planning. Island Press. 63. Fang, S., Gertner, G. Z., Sun, Z., Anderson, A. A., 2005. The impact of interactions in spatial simulation of the dynamics of urban sprawl. Landscape and Urban Planning, 73(4): 294-306. 64. Foley, J. A., DeFries, R., Asner, G. P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S. R., Chapin, F. S., Coe, M. T., Daily, G. C., Gibbs, H. K., Helkowski, J. H., Holloway, T., Howard, E. A., Kucharik, C. J., Monfreda, C., Patz, J. A., Prentice, I. C., Ramankutty, N., Snyder, P. K. , 2005. “Global Consequences of Land Use”, Science, 309: 570–574. 65. Forman, R.T.T. and Godron, M., 1986, Landscape Ecology. New York：John Wiley & Sons. 66. Forman, R.T.T., 1995, Land Mosaics: The ecology of landscapes and regions, Cambridge University Press. 67. Geoghegan, J., Pritchard Jr., L., Ogneva-Himmelberger, Y., Roy, Chowdhury, R., Sanderson, S., Turner II, B.L., 1998. Socializing the pixel and pixelizing the social in land-use/cover change. In: People and Pixels: Linking Remote Sensing and Social Science. Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, National Research Council, Washington, DC, pp. 51–69. 68. GLP, 2005. Science Plan and Implementation Strategy. IGBP Report No. 53/IHDP Report No. 19. IGBP Secretariat, Stockholm. 64pp. 69. Goldstein, N. C., Candau, J. T., and Clarke, K. C., 2004. Approaches to simulating the “March of Bricks and Mortar”. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 28: 125-147. 70. Gustafson, E.J., 1998. Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: What is the state of the art? Ecosystems, 1: 143-156. 71. Herold, M., Couclelis, H. and Clarke K.C., 2005. The role of spatial metrics in the analysis and modelling of urban land use change. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 29: 369-399. 72. Herold, M., Goldstein, N. C., Clarke, K.C., 2003. The spatiotemporal form of urban growth: measurement, analysis and modeling. Remote Sensing of Environment, 86(3): 286-302. 73. IGBP Report No. 35 / HDP Report No. 7., 1995. Land-Use and Land-Cover Change Science/Research Plan (http://www.geo.ucl.ac.be/LUCC/scienceplan /lucc.html). 74. Jantz, C. A. and Goetz, S. J., 2005. Analysis of scale dependencies in an urban land use change model. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 19: 217-241. 75. Jensen, J. R.; Cowen, D. C. Remote sensing of urban/suburban infrastructure and socio-economic attributes. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 1999, 65(5): 611-622. 76. Ji, W., Ma, J., Twibell, R. W., Underhill, K., 2006. Characterizing urban sprawl using multi-stage remote sensing images and landscape metrics. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 30(6): 861–879. 77. Lambin, E. F., Baulies, X., Bockstael, N., Fischer, G., Krug T., Leemans, R., Moran, E. F., Rindfuss, R. R, Sato, Y., Skole, D., Turner II B. L., and Vogel, C. (1999). Land-Use and Land-Cover Change (LUCC)–Implementation Strategy. A core project of the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme and the International Human Dimensions Programme Global Environmental Change (=IGBP Report; 48/IHDP Report; 10).–IGBP Secretariat: Stockholm &IHDP Secretariat: Bonn. 78. Legesse, D., Vallet-Coulomb, C., Gasse, F., 2003. Hydrological response of a catchment to climate and land use changes in Tropical Africa: case study South Central Ethiopia. Journal of Hydrology, 275(1-2): 67-85. 79. LUCC- Land-Use and Land-Cover Change. Available: http://www.geo.ucl.ac.be/LUCC/lucc.html. 80. Luck, M. and Wu, J., 2002. A gradient analysis of the landscape pattern of urbanization in the Phoenix metropolitan area of USA. Landscape Ecology, 17: 327-339. 81. McColl C. and Aggett G., 2007. Land-use forecasting and hydrologic model integration for improved land-use decision support. Journal of Environmental Management, 84(4): 494-512. 82. Mcgarigal, K. and Marks, B. J., 1995. FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tec. Rep. PNW-351. 83. Mertens, B. and Lambin, E. F., 1997. Spatial modelling of deforestation in southern Cameroon. Applied Geography, 17: 143–162. 84. Naveh, Z. and Lieberman, A. S., 1993. Landscape Ecology: Theory and Application. New York: Springer-Verlag Press. 85. NEH-4 (1964, reprinted in 1985) National Engineering Handbook, Section 4—Hydrology. US Dept. of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, US Govt Printing Office, Washington, DC. 86. Olivera F., 2001. Extracting Hydrologic Information from Spatial Data for HMS Modeling. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 6(6): 524-530. 87. Parker, D. C., Manson, S. M., Janssen, M., Hoffmann, M. J. and Deadman, P. J., 2003. Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land use and land cover change: a review. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93(2): 316-340. 88. Schaldach, R. and Priess, J. A., 2008. Integrated Models of the Land System: A Review of Modelling Approaches on the Regional to Global Scale. Living Rev. Landscape Res., 2, (2008), 1. Available: http://www.livingreviews.org/lrlr-2008-1. 89. Sietchiping, R., 2004. A Geographic Information Systems and Cellular Automata-Based Model of Informal Settlement Growth. PhD thesis, SAGES-School of Anthropology, Geography and Environmental Studies, The University of Melbourne. 90. Silva, E. A. and Clarke, K. C., 2002. Calibration of the SLEUTH urban growth model for Lisbon and Porto, Portugal. Computer, Environment and Urban Systems, 26(6): 525-552. 91. Solecki, D. W. and Oliveri, C., 2004. Downscaling climate change scenarios in an urban land use change model. Environmental Management, 72: 105-115. 92. Syphard, A.D., Clarke, K.C. and Franklin, J., 2005. Using a cellular automaton model to forecast the effects of urban growth on habitat pattern in southern California. Ecological Complexity, 2: 185-203. 93. Turner M. G., and Gardner, R. H., 1991. Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology, Springer, New York. 94. Turner, B. L. Ⅱ. and Meyer, W. B., 1994. Global Land-Use and Land-Cover Change: An Overview.–in: Meyer, W. B. and Turner, II B. L. (Eds): Changes in Land Use and Land Cover: A Global Perspective.–University of Cambridge: Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, pp. 3-10. 95. Turner, B. L. Ⅱ., Moss, R. H. and Skole, eds. D. L., 1993. Relating Land Use and Global Land-Cover change: A Proposal for an IGBP-HDP Core Project. IGBP report No.24 and the HDP report No.5. Stochkolm: Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. 96. Turner, B. L. Ⅱ., Skole, D., Sanderson, D., Fishcher, G., Fresco, G. and Leemans, R., 1995. Land Use and Global Land-Cover change: A Proposal for an IGBP-HDP Core Project. IGBP report No.35 and the HDP report No.7. Stochkolm:Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. 97. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC)., 2000. HEC-HMS technical reference manual. 98. Veldkamp, A. and Fresco, L. O., 1996. CLUE: a conceptual model to study the conversion of land use and its effects, Ecological Modelling, 85: 253-270. 99. Verburg, P. H. and Chen, Y.Q., 2000. Multiscale Characterization of Land-Use Patterns in China, Ecosystems, 3: 369-385. 100. Verburg, P. H. van Eck, J. R. R., de Nijs, T. C. M. and Schot, M. J. D. P., 2004. Determinants of land-use change patterns in the Netherlands, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31: 125-150. 101. Verburg, P. H., 2000. Exploring the spatial and temporal dynamics of land use - with special reference to China, PhD-thesis, Wageningen University. 102. Verburg, P. H., Soepboer, W., Veldkamp, A., Limpiada, R., Espaldon, V. and Sharifah Mastura, S.A., 2002. Modelling the Spatial Dynamics of Regional Land Use: the CLUE-S Model, Environmental Management, 30(3): 391-405. 103. Verburg, P. H., Veldkamp, T. A. and Bouma, J., 1999. Land use change under conditions of high population pressure: the case of Java, Global Environmental Change, 9(4): 303-312. 104. Verburg, P. H.; Veldkamp, A., 2004. Projecting land use transitions at forest fringes in the Philippines at two spatial scales. Landscape Ecology, 19(1): 77-98. 105. Weng, Y. C., 2007. Spatiotemporal changes of landscape pattern in response to urbanization. Landscape and Urban Planning, 81: 341–353. 106. Xian, G. and Crane M., 2005. Assessments of urban growth in the Tampa Bay watershed using remote sensing data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 97: 203-215. 107. Yang, X., Lo, C. P., 2003. Modelling urban growth and landscape changes in the Atlanta metropolitan area. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 17: 463-488. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/37237 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 土地利用變遷及其對環境衝擊之研究中，模擬模式為量化方法之重要工具。經由模式之建立可瞭解變遷機制與趨勢，以及土地利用變遷對於水文系統之影響，提供集水區永續經營管理之依據。而土地利用變遷模式依照其模擬機制，可分為自上而下(top-down)與自下而上(bottom-up)的方法，但兩種模式極少被同時使用。而土地利用變遷對水文量之影響常可由分佈性水文模式加以模擬及量化。本研究嘗試結合兩種模擬機制之土地利用變遷模式，模擬土地利用變遷之空間分佈，並以降雨-逕流模式模擬與評估土地利用變遷之衝擊。
本研究以鄰近台北都會區之寶橋集水區為例，並以1990、1993、1998與2000年SPOT衛星影像，首先應用自下而上之模式－SLEUTH，模擬2001-2025年之土地利用面積及空間分佈，以空間統計模式－CLUE-S及SLEUTH模擬之面積，模擬相同期距之研究區土地利用格局及空間分佈。並以降雨-逕流模式HEC-HMS及2000年之暴雨事件模擬與評估土地利用變遷對暴雨逕流量之影響，且比較相同事件下2025年及2000年之逕流量差異，同時以景觀生態指數分析土地格局空間分佈變遷之趨勢，以評估不同機制土地利用模式之適用性。 研究結果顯示SLEUTH模式可模擬未來土地利用之需求趨勢，CLUE-S模式較能模擬符合研究區域土地利用格局之歷史趨勢，土地利用模擬結果顯示，土地利用格局於2015年趨於穩定，土地利用雜異化程度於2010年後逐漸變小，由逕流模擬結果指出，2025年寶橋集水區的建地增加、不透水表面增加，造成洪峰流量與總逕流體積增加、洪峰時刻提早。比較第二類與第三類臨前水分條件之水文事件，發現第三類臨前水分條件之事件所模擬水文量的變化較第二類更為敏感。本研究成功地結合兩種土地利用模式及降雨-逕流模式，並應用於寶橋集水區之土地利用變遷及對暴雨逕流之影響評估，此整合之方法可提供集水區之土地利用管理及規劃之參考。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Models are important tools for quantifying approaches in the research of land-use and environmental impacts. Humans can realize the mechanisms and trends of land-use changes and their effects on hydrological system for the watershed planning and management. Land-use models based on their simulating mechanisms can be divided into top-down and bottom-up approaches, but these two kinds of models are seldom applied together. Distributed hydrological models can simulate and quantify land-use changes and its effects on hydrology. This study attempts to combine two land-use models of different simulating mechanisms, and simulates the spatial distribution of land-use changes. This study also simulates and evaluates land-use changes and their effects on hydrology by HEC-HMS model.
This study used four historical SPOT images for 1990, 1993, 1998 and 2000 for the Paochiao watershed next to Taipei metropolis. The SLEUTH model is a bottom-up model that simulated land-use area and spatial distribution from 2001-2025. CLUE-S model is a spatial statistical model that simulated the same period in the study area. The rainfall-runoff model HEC-HMS and storm events in 2000 simulated and evaluated land-use changes and their influences on rainfall-runoff and compared to the difference of runoff for the same event in 2000 and 2025. Calculating and analyzing the landscape metrics of land-use spatial changes and trends can evaluate the suitability of different mechanism land-use models. The results revealed that SLEUTH model can simulate the trend of land-use demand, and the CLUE-S model can simulate the land-use patterns that fit to the historical trend. The consequences of land-use changes showed that the fragmentation of the landscape patterns tend to be stable after 2015 and spatial heterogeneity of land-use changes gradually become small. The land-use simulated results revealed that the built-up area and impervious surface increase. The hydrological components are affected by urban sprawl; specifically, the peak discharge, total runoff volume increased, and the time to peak early arrived. Comparing to the antecedent moisture condition II and III, the antecedent moisture condition III is more sensitive than the type II in reflecting the magnitude of the hydrology. This study integrates two land-use models and a rainfall-runoff model. Moreover, it applies to land-use change and its effects on rainfall-runoff in the Paochiao watershed. Therefore, this integrated approach can provide to the watershed management and planning as a reference in the future. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T15:22:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R95622035-1.pdf: 2081281 bytes, checksum: 145e7685b8d9ac4bf018b54ebd4b2988 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝 誌 I
摘 要 II Abstract III 目 錄 IV 圖目錄 VI 表目錄 VIII 第一章 緒 論 1 第一節 研究緣起 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第三節 研究流程 4 第二章 文獻回顧 6 第一節 土地利用變遷與模式 6 第二節 集水區降雨-逕流模式 19 第三節 景觀生態學指數 21 第三章 研究方法與材料 23 第一節 研究區域 23 第二節 研究材料 30 第三節 土地利用變遷模式 33 第四節 景觀生態學理論 45 第五節 降雨-逕流模式 50 第四章 結果與討論 63 第一節 土地利用變遷模擬結果 63 第二節 降雨-逕流模式水文量模擬結果 73 第三節 討論 84 第五章 結論與建議 98 第一節 結論 98 第二節 後續研究建議 100 參考文獻 101 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 集水區土地利用管理 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 土地利用變遷模式 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | SLEUTH模式 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | CLUE-S模式 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 景觀生態指數 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 降雨-逕流模式 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | CLUE-S model | en |
| dc.subject | watershed land-use management | en |
| dc.subject | rainfall-runoff model | en |
| dc.subject | landscape metrics | en |
| dc.subject | land-use modeling | en |
| dc.subject | SLEUTH model | en |
| dc.title | 應用自上而下與自下而上土地利用及降雨-逕流模式模擬土地利用變遷與水文量－以寶橋集水區為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Applications of top-down and bottom-up land use and rainfall-runoff models to simulate land use changes and hydrology- a case study of Paochiao watershed | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張康聰,張尊國,童慶斌 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 土地利用變遷模式,SLEUTH模式,CLUE-S模式,景觀生態指數,降雨-逕流模式,集水區土地利用管理, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | land-use modeling,SLEUTH model,CLUE-S model,landscape metrics,rainfall-runoff model,watershed land-use management, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 109 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2008-07-23 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物環境系統工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 生物環境系統工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-97-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.03 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。