請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/37216完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 姚開屏(Kai-Ping Yao) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu-Yu Hsiao | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 蕭宇佑 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T15:21:38Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2008-07-23 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2008-07-23 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2008-07-23 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | References
Abbey, A., & Andrews, F. M. (1985). Modeling the psychological determinants of life quality. Social Indicators Research, 16(1), 1-34. Aitken, R. C. (1969). Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales. Proceedings Of The Royal Society Of Medicine, 62(10), 989-993. Armstrong, R. L. (1987). The midpoint on a five-point Likert-type scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 64(2), 359-362. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman. Bentler, P. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246. Bernstein, G. A., & Garfinkel, B. D. (1992). The Visual Analogue Scale for Anxiety--Revised: Psychometric properties. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 6(3), 223-239. Beveridge, A. A. (1976). Quality of American life - perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions - Campbell,A, Converse,PE and Rodgers,WL. Political Science Quarterly, 91(3), 529-531. Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1986). Statistical-methods for assessing agreement between 2 methods of clinical measurement. Lancet, 1(8476), 307-310. Bond, A. J., Shine, P., & Bruce, M. (1995). Validation of visual analogue scales in anxiety. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 5(1), 1-9. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230-258. Brunier, G., & Graydon, J. (1996). A comparison of two methods of measuring fatigue in patients on chronic haemodialysis: Visual analogue vs Likert scale. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 33(3), 338-348. Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthen, B. (1989). Testing for the Equivalence of Factor Covariance and Mean Structures: The Issue of Partial Measurement Invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 456-466. Campbell, D. T. (1960). Recommendations for APA test standards regarding construct, trait, or discriminant validity. American Psychologist, 15(8), 546-553. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validity by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81-105. Carlsson, A. M. (1984). 'Assessment of chronic pain: I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale': Commentary reply. Pain, 19(1), 99. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233-255. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd. ed.). 69 Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Cole, M. S., Bedeian, A. G., & Feild, H. S. (2006). The Measurement Equivalence of Web-Based and Paper-and-Pencil Measures of Transformational Leadership: A Multinational Test. Organizational Research Methods, 9(3), 339-368. Corten, I. W., Saris, W. E., Coenders, G., van der Veld, W., Aalberts, C. E., & Kornelis, C. (2002). Fit of Different Models for Multitrait-Multimethod Experiments. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 213-232. Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to Validity. In Introduction to classical and modern test theory New York Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. Cronbach, L. J., Nageswari, R., & Gleser, G. C. (1963). Theory of generalizability: A liberation of reliability theory. The British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 16, 137-163. de Boer, A., van Lanschot, J., Stalmeier, P., van Sandick, J., Hulscher, J., de Haes, J., et al. (2004). Is a single-item visual analogue scale as valid, reliable and responsive as multi-item scales in measuring quality of life? Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care & Rehabilitation, 13(2), 311-320. Devlin, N. J., Hansen, P., & Selai, C. (2004). Understanding health state valuations: A qualitative analysis of respon dents' comments. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care & Rehabilitation, 13(7), 1265-1277. Di Benedetto, M., Lindner, H., Hare, D. L., & Kent, S. (2005). A Cardiac Depression Visual Analogue Scale for the brief and rapid assessment of depression following acute coronary syndromes. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 59(4), 223-229. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75. Ebel, R. L. (1951). Estimation of the reliability of ratings. Psychometrika, 16(4), 407-424. Feldt, L. S., Woodruff, D. J., & Salih, F. A. (1987). statistical-inference for coefficient-alpha. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11(1), 93-103. Ferrans, C. E., & Powers, M. J. (1985). The employment potential of hemodialysis patients. Nursing Research, 34(5), 273-277. Fisher, R. A. (1925). Statistical methods for research workers. (11th ed. rev.): Oliver and Boyd: Edinburgh. Flamer, S. (1983). Assement of the multitrait-multimethod matrix validity of Likert scales via confirmatory factor-analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18(3), 275-308. 70 Forsythe, G. B., McGaghie, W. C., & Friedman, C. P. (1986). Construct-validity of medical clinical competence measures- A multitrait-multimethod matrix study using confirmatory factor-analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 23(2), 315-336. Freyd, M. (1923). The graphic rating scale. Journal of Eduacational Psychology, 14, 83-102. Gregory, R. J. (2000). Test Construction. In Psychological testing: History, principles, and applications (3rd ed.). Boston ; London: Allyn & Bacon, Inc. Grunberg, S., Groshen, S., Steingass, S., Zaretsky, S., & et al. (1996). Comparison of conditional quality of life terminology and visual analogue scale measurements. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care & Rehabilitation, 5(1), 65-72. Gudex, C., Dolan, P., Kind, P., & Williams, A. (1996). Health state valuations from the general public using the Visual Analogue Scale. Quality of Life Research, 5(6), 521-531. Harper, A., & Power, M. (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28(3), 551-558. Hayes, M. H. S., & Patterson, D. G. (1921). Experimantal Development of the Graphic Rating Method. Psychological Bulletin, 18, 98-99. Hensley, W. E., & Roberts, M. K. (1976). Dimensions of Rosenburg's self-esteem scale. Psychological Reports, 38(2), 583-584. Herrman, H., Metelko, Z., Szabo, S., Rajkumar, S., Kumar, S., Vanheck, G., et al. (1993). Study protocol for the World-Health-Organization project to develop a quality-of-life assessment instrument (WHOQOL). Quality of Life Research, 2(2), 153-159. Hollen, P. J., Gralla, R. J., Kris, M. G., McCoy, S., Donaldson, G. W., & Moinpour, C. M. (2005). A comparison of visual analogue and numerical rating scale formats for the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS): Does format affect patient ratings of symptoms and quality of life? Quality of Life Research, 14(3), 837-847. Horn, J. L., & McArdle, J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18(3-4), 117-144. Hoyle, R. H. (1995). The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 1-15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Hu, L.-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance 71 structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. Huang, F. C., Gillespie, R. B., & Kuo, A. D. (2006). Human adaptation to interaction forces in visuo-motor coordination. IEEE Transactions On Neural Systems And Rehabilitation Engineering: A Publication Of The IEEE Engineering In Medicine And Biology Society, 14(3), 390-397. Hulley, S. B., Cummings, S. R., Browner, W. S., Grady, D., Hearst, N., & Newman, T. B. (2001). Designing clinical research: An epidemiologic approach: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. Jones, D., Westall, C., Averbeck, K., & Abdolell, M. (2003). Visual acuity assessment: a comparison of two tests for measuring children's vision. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 23(6), 541-546. Kalichman, S. C., Cain, D., Fuhrel, A., Eaton, L., Di Fonzo, K., & Ertl, T. (2005). Assessing medication adherence self-efficacy among low-literacy patients: Development of a pictographic visual analogue scale. Health Education Research, 20(1), 24-35. Kenny, D. A. (1976). Emprirical application of confirmatory factor-analysis to multitrait-multimethod matrix. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12(3), 247-252. Kenny, D. A., Albright, L., Malloy, T. E., & Kashy, D. A. (1994). Consensus in interpersonal perception-acquaintance and the BIG-5. Psychological Bulletin, 116(2), 245-258. Kenny, D. A., & Kashy, D. A. (1992). Analysis of the multitrait-multimethod matrix by confirmatory factor-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 165-172. Kertzman, S., Aladjem, Z., Milo, R., Ben-Nahum, Z., Birger, M., Grinspan, H., et al. (2004). The utility of the Visual Analogue Scale for the assessment of depressive mood in cognitively impaired patients. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 19(8), 789-796. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). Measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174. Lee, J. W., Brown, E. S., Perantie, D. C., & Bobadilla, L. (2002). A comparison of single-item Visual Analog Scales with a multiitem Likert-type scale for assessment of cocaine craving in persons with bipolar disorder. Addictive Disorders & Their Treatment, 1(4), 140-142. Lee, J. W., Jones, P. S., Mineyama, Y., & Zhang, X. E. (2002). Cultural differences in responses to a Likert scale. Research in Nursing & Health, 25(4), 295-306. Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22, 55. 72 Lin, L. I. (1989). A concordance correlation-coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics, 45(1), 255-268. Lohr, K. N. (2002). Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria. Quality of Life Research, 11(3), 193. Luo, Z., & Ito, M. (1998). Diffusion-based learning theory for organizing visuo-motor coordination. Biological Cybernetics, 79(4), 279-289. Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of Multivariate Skewness and Kurtosis with Applications. Biometrika, 57(3), 519-530. Marsh, H. W., Byrne, B. M., & Craven, R. (1992). Overcoming problems in confirmatory factor-analyses of MTMM data - the correlated uniqueness model and factorial invariance. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27(4), 489-507. Matell, M. S., & Jacoby, J. (1971). Is there an optimal number of alternatives for Likert scale items? I. Reliability and validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31(3), 657-674. Matell, M. S., & Jacoby, J. (1972). Is there an optimal number of alternatives for Likert-scale items? Effects of testing time and scale properties. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56(6), 506-509. Maurer, T. J., & Pierce, H. R. (1998). A comparison of Likert scale and traditional measures of self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 324-329. McCormack, H. M., Horne, D. J., & Sheather, S. (1988). Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: A critical review. [Journal Peer Reviewed Journal]. Psychological Medicine, 18(4), 1007-1019. McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64-82. McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1996). Forming Inferences About Some Intraclass Correlation Coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 30-46. Meade, A. W., & Lautenschlager, G. J. (2004). A Monte-Carlo study of confirmatory factor analytic tests of measurement equivalence/invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(1), 60-72. Morrison, D. P. (1983). The Crichton Visual Analogue Scale for the assessment of behaviour in the elderly. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 68(6), 408-413. Muthen, B., & Kaplan, D. (1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor-analysis of non-normal Likert variables. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 38(Nov), 171-189. Pagano, R. R. (2001). Understanding statistics in the behavioral sciences (6th ed.). 73 Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning. Parkin, D., & Devlin, N. (2006). Is there a case for using visual analogue scale valuations in costutility analysis? Health Economics, 15(7), 653-664. Raaijmakers, Q. A., van Hoof, A., Hart, H. t., Verbogt, T. F., & Vollebergh, W. A. (2000). Adolescents' midpoint responses on Likert-type scale items: Neutral or missing values? International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12(2), 208-216. Raat, H., Bonsel, G. J., Hoogeveen, W., & Essink-Bot, M.-L. (2004). Feasibility and Reliability of a Mailed Questionnaire to Obtain Visual Analogue Scale Valuations for Health States Defined by the Health Utilities Index Mark 3. Medical Care, 42(1), 13-18. Rothman, A. J. (2000). Encyclopedia of psychology (Vol. 5). Washington, D.C;Oxford;New York American Psychological Association;Oxford University Press. Schipper, H., & Levitt, M. (1985). Measuring quality of life - risk and benefits. Cancer Treatment Reports, 69(10), 1115-&. Shields, B. J., Cohen, D. M., Harbeck-Weber, C., Powers, J. D., & Smith, G. A. (2003). Pediatric Pain Measurement Using a Visual Analogue Scale: A Comparison of Two Teaching Methods. Clinical Pediatrics, 42(3), 227-234. Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations - uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420-428. Singer, A. J., & Thode, H. C. (1998). Determination of the minimal clinically significant difference on a patient visual analog satisfaction scale. Academic Emergency Medicine, 5(10), 1007-1011. Skevington, S. M., Lotfy, M., & O'Connell, K. A. (2004). The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial - A report from the WHOQOL group. Quality of Life Research, 13(2), 299-310. Spector, P. E. (1976). Choosing response categories for summated rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(3), 374-375. Spector, P. E. (1980). Ratings of equal and unequal response choice intervals. Journal of Social Psychology, 112(1), 115. Stiggelbout, A. M., Eijkemans, M. J. C., Kiebert, G. M., Kievit, J., Leer, J. W. H., & DeHaes, H. (1996). The 'utility' of the visual analog scale in medical decision making and technology assessment - Is it an alternative to the time trade-off? International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 12(2), 291-298. Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (2003). Health Measurement-A Practical Guide to 74 Their Development and Use(3rd). New York: Oxford University Press. The-WHOQOL-Taiwan-Group. (2001). The user's manual of the development of the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version. (1st rev ed.). Taipei. Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4-69. Vincent, A. H. (2002). Measurement issues in determining interrater agreement. Vincent, Andrea Harrell: U Oklahoma, US. Vinsnes, A. G., & Hunskaar, S. (1991). Distress associated with urinary incontinence, as measured by a visual analogue scale. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 5(1), 57-61. Weng, L. J., & Cheng, C. P. (2000). Effects of response order on Likert-type scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(6), 908-924. Wilkie, D. J., Lovejoy, N., Dodd, M., & Tesler, M. D. (1990). Cancer pain intensity measurement: Concurrent validity of three tools: Finger dynamometer, pain intensity number scale, visual analogue scale. Hospice Journal, 6(1), 1-13. Yao, G. (2000). Critiques on Six Generic Health-Related Quality of Life Scales and Suggestions on the Future Studies. Psychological Testing, 47(2), 111-138. Yao, G., Chung, C. W., Yu, C. F., & Wang, J. D. (2002). Development and Verification of Reliability and Validity of the WHOHR-QOL-BREF Taiwan Version. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, 101, 342-351. Yao, G., Wu, C. H., & Yang, C. T. (2008). Examining the content validity of the WHOQOL-BREF from respondents' perspective by quantitative methods. Social Indicator Research, 85, 483-498. Zealley, A. K., & Aitken, R. C. (1969). Measurement of mood. Proceedings Of The Royal Society Of Medicine, 62(10), 993-996. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/37216 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 李克式量尺 (Likert-Type Scale) 和 視覺化類比量尺 (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS) 是量測生活品質 (Quality of Life, QOL) 最常用的兩種量尺。從過去學者對此兩種量尺的探討發現，這兩種量尺不論在設計上或是計分方式上都有很大的差異，而在具有這樣特性差異的前題下，此兩種量尺於量測生活品質上是否具有相同的心理計量特質就是個值得關注的議題。因此，本研究的目的是探討李克式量尺與視覺化類比量尺於生活品質量測上的比較。同時從三個方面進行探討：信度、效度與測量恆等性。
研究結果顯示，雖然視覺化類比量尺的信度表現較佳，但此兩種量尺的信度值都與過去研究所得的數值相仿，表示此兩種量尺在量測生活品質上都有適切的信度表現。同意度指標也顯示兩類量尺在生活品質量測上具有適切的一致性。然而，測量恆等性的分析顯示此兩種量尺所定義出的因素架構並不相同；更進一步的分析也顯示視覺化類比量尺較能有效的反映出生活品質的因素架構，具有較佳的建構效度。由於本研究中樣本多為健康與高教育的樣本，因此本文建議針對健康與高教育的樣本，可使用視覺化類比量尺做為生活品質的量測工具；然而對於其他特殊的群體 (例如：老人)，此兩種量尺的比較尚仰賴後續的研究與探討。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Likert-Type Scale and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) are two common psychometrical methodologies for measuring Quality of Life (QOL). However, these two scales are different from their constructions and rating methods. Besides, whether these different attributes will result in different psychometric properties for Likert-Type Scale and VAS on measuring QOL has not yet been examined. Thus in this present study, the author has compared Likert-Type Scale and VAS for measuring QOL in three aspects: (1) the degree of agreement between these two scales, (2) the evaluation of the Measurement Equivalence/Invariance (ME/I) over these two scales for the assessment of QOL, and (3) the investigation of construct validity of theoretical framework of QOL across these two scales. 496 adult subjects were used in the current study (58.9% female, n= 292; 40.2% male, n=200; mean age=24.64 yrs). Each subject was asked to fill in the WHOQOL-BREF in two different visions, one was measured by Likert-type scale and the other was by VAS. Reliability analyses were applied by using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and split-half coefficient. Besides, agreement analyses were applied by using Pearson’s r, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), Lin’s Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC), and Bland-Altman Plot. Finally, a MTMM matrix and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were used to examine the validity and ME/I across Likert-type Scale and VAS. The result indicated that both Liker-Type Scale and VAS are easy for subjects to answer, and possessed adequate reliability, although reliability for VAS measures are consistently higher than for Likert-Type measures. The agreements between these two scales were high, indicating adequate reproducibility of test scores across the scales. In ME/I analyses, the result showed that VAS measures and Likert-Type measures did not reflect the same structure; furthermore, the VAS defined a better construct of QOL. In a word, VAS seemed to have better psychometric properties for measuring QOL over Likert-Type Scale. But according to the characteristics of subjects in the current study, the result will be applied to healthy and well-educated subjects, and the generalization on special populations (i.e., elderly and patients) is remained to be further explored. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T15:21:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R95227109-1.pdf: 943375 bytes, checksum: cffb7e14c29a7ac211f6a21f76ffb719 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Chapter One. Introduction 1
1-1 The Development of Likert-Type Scale and VAS 3 1-2 The Comparison of Likert-Type Scale and VAS 8 1-3 From Reliability to Agreement 12 1-4 Ways for Scale Agreement Analyses 15 1-5 Validity 22 1-6 Testing Measurement Equivalence/Invariance over different scales 29 Chapter Two. Method 32 2-1 Participants and Procedure 32 2-2 Instrument—WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan 34 2-3 Coding and Rating 35 2-4 Data Analysis—Reliability and Agreement 37 2-5 Data Analysis— Construct Validity 40 Chapter Three. Result 45 3-1 Reliability and Agreement 45 3-2 Construct Validity 53 Chapter Four. Discussion and Conclusion 60 4-1 General Discussion 60 4-2 Limitation and Future Studies 66 Reference 68 Appendix 76 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 李克式量尺與視覺化類比量尺在生活品質量測上的比較：信度、效度與測量恆等性 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Comparison of Likert-Type Scale and Visual Analogue Scale for the assessment of Quality of Life:
Reliability, Validity and Measurement Invariance | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 翁儷禎(Li-Jen Weng),蔡蓉青(Rung-Ching Tsai) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 李克式量尺,視覺化類比量尺,同意度,測量恆等性,生活品質, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Likert-Type Scale,Visual Analogue Scale (VAS),quality of life,measurement equivalence/invariance (ME/I),agreement, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 87 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2008-07-23 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-97-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 921.26 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。