請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/3717完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 蘇以文(I-Wen Su) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hsin-Yen Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳馨妍 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-13T08:36:10Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2016-08-26 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-13T08:36:10Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2016-08-26 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2016-08-17 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Arnheim, R. (2001). Art and visual perception. Stockholms Universitet, Institutionen för Konstvetenskap.
Arnheim, R. (1983). The power of the center: A study of composition in the visual arts. Berkeley: University of California Press. Arnheim, R. (1969). Visual thinking. Berkeley: University of California Press. Aumont, J. (1997). The Image. Translated by Claire Pajackowska. London: British Film Institute. Brandt, P. A. (2006). Form and meaning in art. The artful mind: Cognitive science and the riddle of human creativity, 171-188. Chaudhuri, S. (2010). The Metaphysics of Text. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chen, Hsin-yen and Lily I-wen Su. 2014. Painting as a Grammatical Metaphor: A Cognitive Linguistic Approach to the Study of Miró. Poster presented at the The 1st Conference of the International Association for Cognitive Semiotics (IACS). Lund University. 2014/9/25-27. Chilvers, I. (2004). The Oxford dictionary of art. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Corbella, L.D. (1993). Understanding Miró: Miró Analysis of Language From the Barcelona Series: 1939-44. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona Publications. Translated by Fen-lan Hsu in 1997. Taipei: Artist. Donald, M. (2006). Art and cognitive evolution. The artful mind: Cognitive science and the riddle of human creativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Erben, W. (1988). Joan Miró, 1893-1983: The Man and His Work. Cologne: Taschen. Forceville, C.J. (2006). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven and F.J. Ruiz (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives, 372-402. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Frank, E. (1983). Jackson Pollock. New York: Abbeville Press. Freeman, M. H. (2009). Minding: feeling, form, and meaning in the creation of poetic iconicity. Cognitive Poetics: Goals, Gains, and Gaps, ed. by Geert Brône and Jeroen Vandaele, 169-196. Gardner, J. S. (2011). Aesthetics of spatial composition: Facing, position, and context, and the theory of representational fit. Berkeley: University of California. Geeraerts, D. (2006). Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings (Vol. 34). Walter de Gruyter. Halliday, M.A.K. (2002). Linguistic studies of text and discourse, ed. by Jonathan Webster, London: Continuum. Halliday, M.A.K. (1994a). An Introduction to Functional Grammar 2nd ed. London: Edward Arnold. Halliday, M. A. K. (1990). The Construction of Knowledge and Value in Grammar of Scientific Discourse, with Reference to Charles Darwin's The Origin of Species. Routledge. Hiraga, M. K. (2005). Metaphor and Iconicity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Hiraga, M. K. (1994). Diagrams and metaphors: Iconic aspects in language. Journal of Pragmatics, 22(1), 5-21. Jakobson, R. (1960). Linguistics and Poetics. Style in Language, ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 350-377. Johnson, M. (2007). The meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Karim, A. R., & Kojima, H. (2010). The what and why of perceptual asymmetries in the visual domain. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 6, 103-115. Kennedy, J. M. (1982). Metaphor in pictures. Perception, 11(5), 589-605. Kress, G. R., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge. Kress, G. R., & Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Psychology Press. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Langacker, R. W. (2002). Concept, image, and symbol. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites (Vol. 1). Stanford: Stanford university press. Lewison, J. (1999). Interpreting Pollock. London: Tate Gallery. Luhmann, N. (2000). Art as a social system. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Malet, R. M. (1984). Joan Miró. New York: Rizzoli. Nänny, M., & Fischer, O. (Eds.). (1999). Form miming meaning (Vol. 1). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. O’Halloran, K. L. (2011). Multimodal discourse analysis. Companion to discourse, 120-137. O'toole, M. (1994). The language of displayed art. Fairleigh Dickinson University Press. Peirce, C. S. (1955). The Theory of Signs. Philosophical Writings of Peirce. New York: Dover. Ruhrberg, K., Schneckenburger, M., Fricke, C., & Honnef, K. (2000). Art of the 20th Century, ed. by I. F. Walther. Taschen. Sandler, I. (1977). The triumph of American painting: A history of abstract expressionism. Harper and Row. Schapiro, M. (1969). On some problems in the semiotics of visual art: Field and vehicle in image-signs. Semiotica, 1(3), 223-242. Shanes, E. (1990). The Life and Masterworks of Salvador Dalí. London: Studio Editions. Stockwell, P. (2005). Cognitive poetics: An introduction. London: Routledge. Turner, M. (2006). The artful mind: Cognitive science and the riddle of human creativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Turner, M. & Fauconnier, G. (1995). Conceptual integration and formal expression. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10, 183-204. Vandaele, J., & Brône, G. (2009). Cognitive poetics. A critical introduction. Applications of Cognitive Linguistics 10, 1. Van Dijk, T. A. (1977). Semantic macro-structures and knowledge frames in discourse comprehension. Cognitive processes in comprehension, 3-32. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/3717 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究透過認知語言學的理論與多模態的分析方法，探索非再現性西洋現代繪畫的文本結構，檢測其中是否存在規律的文法象似性。許多學者將象似性視為極具代表性的文本特徵，為自然語言的重要結構規律之一，存在於多種文類中，包括詩文（Hiraga, 2005）與科學寫作（Halliday, 1990）。美中不足的是，如此重要的文法特徵目前很少在語言以外的模態中討論。為回應理論空缺，我們將多模態的文本納入象似性的認知探討。同時，為補足當前的認知研究甚少系統性分析表述意圖與創作形式皆高度自主、不受限作畫傳統或視覺參照物的現代繪畫，而多聚焦於應用取向、圖文比例較為平均的多模態文類探討，本研究取樣最具代表性的90張非再現性西洋現代繪畫，分為具象、半具象與抽象三組樣本，一一檢驗其象似性結構規律。
我們的模型融合並擴充了Hiraga (2005)與Kress and van Leeuwen (1996)的理論，適於分析繪畫的文本結構，並能涵蓋畫作與畫題的多模態混和(Blending)效應。我們的結果顯示，結構性的象似性 (Diagrammatic Iconicity)貫穿三種風格的繪畫樣本，是所有樣本都共享的文本特徵。我們也發現前人尚未觀察到的現象：在資訊結構的象似度上，非再現性的現代西洋繪畫文本和表達性的語言文本、應用類的多模態文本擁有迥異的規律原則。 本研究的貢獻有二。其一，我們以跨領域方法示範了象似性在視覺化文本中的分析，並證實非再現性西洋現代繪畫殊異於其他較常被討論的視覺化文類。其二，我們找到了繪畫樣本中共享的結構性表徵。以此而論，非再現性西洋現代繪畫文本確實具備高度符合認知規律的文本結構。透過本研究，我們將原本侷限於語言模態的討論與檢測，延伸至高度視覺化的多模態文本中。即使是風格各異、形式自由的前衛藝術類視覺文本，也擁有認知導向的文本性規律。非再現性西洋現代繪畫確實能被視作一種文本性穩定的多模態文類，以象似性為基礎，符合Halliday (1990)所定義的文本真實性。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study investigates the “textuality” of modern Western paintings from a Cognitive Linguistic viewpoint. We focused on the examination of nonrepresentational Modern Western paintings, ranging from the figurative to the abstract, and studied how these paintings are arranged structurally. Specifically, we would like to see whether iconicity, an essential principle of linguistic grammar, could be found in the selected paintings.
To find out, we combined the methodologies by Hiraga (2005) and Kress and van Leeuwen (1996), and proposed a model multimodal in nature. Our results show that principles of Diagrammatic Iconicity, which structurally shape the textual flows of the paintings, are the cognitive principles guiding our selected painting samples. Moreover, it is found that the textuality of nonrepresentational modern Western paintings, which is highly poetically expressive, can be uniquely distinguished from the visual texts previously studied, which are mostly applied and commercial-in-nature. This transdisciplinary thesis therefore highlights how cognitive principles interact with the compositions of multimodal texts. Most importantly, nonrepresentational modern paintings could be cognitively viewed as an entrenched text, “grammatically” arranged by various layers of Iconicity, fulfilling a ‘reality of text’ (Halliday, 1990). | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-13T08:36:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R01142006-1.pdf: 9768665 bytes, checksum: 1d16da952de6888d6f73bef2266b7ad2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝 ii
摘要 iii ABSTRACT v TABLE OF CONTENTS vii LIST OF FIGURES ix LIST OF TABLES xi CHAPTER 1 TEXTUALITY AND PICTORIALITY 1 1.1 Background of study 2 1.2 Purpose of study 5 1.3 Organization of study 6 CHAPTER 2 THEORETICAL BACKGROUND 7 2.1 Iconicity and grammar 7 2.2 Iconicity and Grammatical Metaphors 9 2.3 Iconicity and textual flow 13 2.4 Modern Western paintings as autonomous pictorials 17 CHAPTER 3 A COGNITIVE MULTIMODAL METHODLOGY 19 3.1 Adopted models 19 3.2 Data 21 3.3 Analysis procedure 25 3.3.1 Preliminary: Figures and titles 25 3.3.2 Examination 1: Iconicity in Grammatical Metaphors 31 3.3.3 Examination 2: Iconicity in Information Flow 39 CHAPTER 4 GRAMMATICAL ICONICITY IN PAINTINGS 41 4.1 Grammatical iconicity in figurative paintings 42 4.2 Grammatical iconicity in semi-figurative paintings 45 4.3 Grammatical iconicity in abstract paintings 48 4.4 Summary of results 51 CHAPTER 5 TEXTUAL FLOW IN PAINTINGS 54 5.1 Textual flow in Figurative paintings 54 5.2 Textual flow in Semi-figurative paintings 57 5.3 Textual flow in Abstract paintings 58 5.4 Summary of results 60 CHAPTER 6 TEXTUALITY IN NONREPRESENTATIONAL MODERN WESTERN PAINTINGS 62 6.1 Modern paintings and multimodality 63 6.2 Textual patterns and iconicity in nonrepresentational modern paintings 65 6.3 Modern paintings as entrenched texts 75 6.4 Concluding remarks 78 REFERENCES 80 APPENDIX 1 83 APPENDIX 2 86 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 認知語言學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 文法隱喻 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 肖似性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 多模態 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 現代西洋繪畫 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 非再現性藝術 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Multimodality | en |
| dc.subject | Iconicity | en |
| dc.subject | Grammatical Metaphor | en |
| dc.subject | Cognitive Linguistics | en |
| dc.subject | Modern Western Paintings | en |
| dc.subject | Nonrepresentational Art | en |
| dc.title | 現代繪畫中文本性之認知多模態探討 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | “Textuality” in Nonrepresentational Modern Western Paintings: A Cognitive Multimodal Exploration | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張正仁(Cheng- Jen Chang),呂佳蓉(Chia-Rung Lu) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 多模態,肖似性,文法隱喻,認知語言學,現代西洋繪畫,非再現性藝術, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Multimodality,Iconicity,Grammatical Metaphor,Cognitive Linguistics,Modern Western Paintings,Nonrepresentational Art, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 100 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201602575 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2016-08-18 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 語言學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 語言學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-105-1.pdf | 9.54 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。