請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/37114
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 吳賴雲 | |
dc.contributor.author | Hsuang-Hung Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳宣宏 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T15:19:27Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2013-07-30 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2008-07-30 | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2008-07-22 | |
dc.identifier.citation | [1] 甘錫瀅、張敬昌、謝紹松,“細說臺北101高樓”,科學月刊,第三十八卷,第八期,第690-699頁 (2003)。
[2] 蔡益超、陳瑞華、項維邦,“建築物風力規範條文、解說及示範例之研訂”,內政部建築研究所成果報告 (1996)。 [3] Frahm, H. Device for Damping Vibration of Bodies. U. S. Patent No. 989-958 (1911). [4] Den Hartog JP. Mechanical Vibrations. 4th edn, McGraw-Hill, New York (1956). [5] Ioi T, and Ikeda K. “On the dynamic vibration damped absorber of the vibration system.” Bulletin of the Japanese Society of Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 21, pp. 64-71 (1978). [6] Warburton GB., and Ayorinde EO. “Optimum absorber parameters for simple systems.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 8, pp. 197-217 (1980). [7] Ayorinde EO., and Warburton GB. “Minimizing structural vibrations with absorbers.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 8, pp. 219-236 (1980). [8] Warburton GB. “Optimum absorber parameters for various combinations of response and excitation parameters.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 10, pp. 381-401 (1982). [9] Sadek F., Mohraz B., Taylor AW., and Chung RM. “A method of estimating the parameters of mass dampers for seismic applications.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 26, pp. 617-635 (1997). [10] Bakre SV., and Jangid RS. “Optimum parameters of tuned mass damper for damped main system.” Structural Control and Health Monitoring. Vol. 14, pp. 448-470 (2007). [11] Ghosh A., and Basu B. “A closed-form optimal tuning criterion for TMD in damped structures.” Structural Control and Health Monitoring. Vol. 14, pp. 681-692 (2005). [12] Fujino Y., and Abe M. “Design formulas for tuned mass dampers based on a perturbation technique.” Engineering and Sturctural Dynamics. Vol. 22, pp. 833-854 (1993). [13] Tasi HC., and Lin GC. “Optimum tuned-mass dampers for minimizing steady-state response of support-excited and damped systems.” Engineering and Sturctural Dynamics. Vol. 22, pp. 957-973 (1993). [14] Tasi HC., and Lin GC. “Explicit formulae for optimum absorber parameters for force-excited and viscously damped systems.” Journal of Sound and Vibration. Vol. 176, pp. 585-596 (1994). [15] Lee CL., Chen YT., Chung LL., and Wang YP. “Optimal design theories and applications of tuned mass dampers.” Engineering Structures. Vo1. 28, pp. 43-53 (2006). [16] 陳永蒼,“多重調諧質塊阻尼系統之最佳控制理論及應用”,碩士論文,國立交通大學土木工程所 (2001)。 [17] Hoang N., and Warnitchi P. “Design of multiple tuned mass dampers by using a numerical optimizer.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. Vol. 34, pp. 125-144 (2005). [18] Li C., and Zhu B. “Estimating double tuned mass dampers for structures under ground acceleration using a novel optimum criterion.” Journal of Sound and Vibration. Vol. 298, pp. 280-297 (2006). [19] Hadi MN., and Arfiadi Y. “Optimum design of absorber for MDOF structures.” Journal of Structural Engineering. Vol. 124, pp. 1272-1280 (1998). [20] Wu J., and Chen G. “Optimization of multiple tuned mass dampers for seismic response reduction.” Proceedings of the American Control Conference. Vol. 1, pp. 519-523 (2000). [21] Joshi AS., and Jangid RS. “Optimum parameters of multiple tuned mass dampers for base-excited damped systems.” Journal of Sound and Vibration. Vol. 202, pp. 657-667 (1997). [22] Bakre SV., and Jangid RS. “Optimum multiple tuned mass dampers for base-excited damped main system.” International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics. Vol. 4, pp. 527-542 (2004). [23] 張民岦,“淺談調諧質量阻尼器”,中華技術季刊,67期 (2005. 7)。 [24] Terenzi G. “Dynamics of SDOF systems with nonlinear viscous damping.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics. Vol. 125, pp. 956-963 (1999). [25] Gerges RR. “Wind tunnel study of the across-wind response of a slender tower with a nonlinear tuned mass damper.” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. Vol. 91, pp. 1069-1092 (2003). [26] Rudinger F. “Optimal vibration absorber with nonlinear viscous power law damping and white noise excitation.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics. Vol.132, pp. 46-53 (2006). [27] Rudinger F. “Tuned mass damper with nonlinear viscous damping.” Journal of Sound and Vibration. Vol. 300, pp. 932-948 (2007). [28] 吳賴雲,鍾立來,張忠信,黃旭輝,陳家乾,“非線性調諧質塊阻尼器設計參數之最佳化”,中華民國結構工程學會,結構工程期刊,第23卷,第2期 (2008)。 [29] Gaul L., and Nitsche R. “Friction control for vibration suppression.” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. Vol. 14, pp. 139-150 (2000). [30] Inaudi JA., and Kelly JM. “Mass damper using friction-dissipating device.” Journal of Engineering Mechanic.Vol. 121, pp. 142-149 (1995). [31] Ricciardelli F., and Vickery BJ. “Tuned vibration absorbers with dry friction damping.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics.Vol. 28, pp. 707-724 (1999). [32] 田志昌,張黎明,“乾摩擦在調諧質量阻尼係數中的利用”,工程抗震,(1):21-23 (2000)。 [33] Mokha AS., Constantinou MC., Reinhorn AM., and Zayas V. “Experimental study of friction pendulum system isolation system.” Journal of Structural Engineering. ASCE, Vol. 117, No. 4, pp. 1201-1217 (1991). [34] Tsopelas P., Constantinou MC., Kim YS., and Okamoto S. “Experimental study of FPS system in bridge seismic isolation.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. Vol. 25, pp. 65-78 (1996). [35] Mokha AS., Amin N., Constantinou MC., and Zayas V. “Seismic isolation retrofit of large historic building.” Journal of Structural Engineering. ASCE, Vol. 122(3), pp. 298-308 (1996). [36] Zayas V., Low SS., and Mahin SA. “A simple pendulum technique for achieving seismic isolation.” Earthquake Spectra. Vol. 6(2), pp. 317-331 (1990). [37] 李大望,關罡,霍達,“FPS型TMD控震效應分析”,工業建築,第31卷,第2期,21 (2001)。 [38] 熊世樹,潘琴存,黃麗婷,“FPS型TMD振動台試驗模型設計及其減震效率仿真分析”,工程抗震與加固改造,第28卷,第5期 (2006)。 [39] 李黎,夏正春,張行,梁政平,“FPS型MTMD在輸電塔減震中的應用”,華中科技大學學報 (城市科學版),第24卷,第3期 (2007)。 [40] Feng MQ., and Mita A. “Vibration control of tall buildings using mega subconfiguration.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics. Vol. 121, No. 10, pp. 1082-1088 (1995). [41] Lyan-Ywan Lu, Lap-Loi Chung, Lai-Yun Wu, and Ging-Long Lin. “Dynamic analysis of structures with friction devices using discrete-time state-space formulation.” Computers and Structures. Vol. 84, No. 15-16, pp. 1049-1071 (2006). [42] 鍾立來,“結構主動控制講義”,國立台灣大學土木工程研究所 (2007)。 [43] 吳賴雲,鍾立來,陳家乾,黃國倫,“臺北101結構風力振動之控制模擬”,第七屆結構工程研討會 (2005)。 [44] 何明錦,甘錫瀅,謝紹松,“「臺北101大樓」,結構工程規劃設計記錄”,內政部建研所報告 (2003)。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/37114 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本文旨在探討結構加裝單一FPS型TMD之最佳化研究,考慮定摩擦與變摩擦兩種摩擦系統,其中定摩擦系統之摩擦係數為定值,不隨著摩擦面位置不同而改變;變摩擦系統之摩擦係數則為變數,隨著摩擦面位置不同而改變。首先,將動力平衡方程式轉換成一階狀態方程式,以求得離散時間系統之狀態方程式來進行動力分析,在TMD之摩擦力計算方面,以一個方程式囊括兩種滑動行為 (滑動狀態與非滑動狀態) 而求出摩擦力。接著,推導出最佳化理論,於計算流程中採用迭代法並搭配golden section search以求取最佳化參數。再者,針對TMD設計參數,即質量比、頻率比及摩擦參數,進行參數分析 (靈敏度分析),探討設計參數對減振之影響與效果。最後,以臺北101大樓為案例分析對象,模擬臺北101加裝FPS型TMD之減振效果,驗証FPS型TMD之可行性,並與原來的減振元件 (黏滯型TMD) 做一比較。分析結果顯示,FPS型TMD之擺動在小角度的前提下,最佳化理論確實可行,可達到良好的減振效果;而參數分析部分,頻率比對於結構減振相當靈敏,摩擦參數則較不靈敏;並由臺北101大樓的案例分析可知,只要設計得宜,不論是定摩擦系統、或者變摩擦系統之FPS型TMD,均可達減振目的,使其頂樓加速度峰值降至5 gal以下,而其中變摩擦系統之FPS型TMD減振效果最為顯著。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In this report, optimal design of a structure implemented with a friction pendulum system (FPS) typed tuned mass damper (TMD) is proposed. Two kinds of friction system are considered. One of them is fixed friction system whose friction coefficient is fixed and independent of relative displacement; the other one is variable friction system whose friction coefficient is variable and dependent on relative displacement. At first, by employing the first order state-space equation transferred from the motion equation of a structure implemented with a FPS typed TMD, the discrete-time state-space equation by which the time history analysis can be conducted is derived. In computing friction force, an equation which includes two kinds of motion behaviors (stick and slip states) is proposed. Then, the procedure of optimal theory is proposed to obtain the optimal design parameters of FPS typed TMD, and the iteration method and golden section search are used in the process. Moreover, the effect of design parameters to vibration suppression (sensibility analysis) is studied. Finally, as an example the structural response of Taipei 101 implemented with a FPS typed TMD subjected to designed wind force is simulated, and the feasibility is verified and compared with the original design of the nonlinear viscous TMD for Taipei 101. The result shows that optimal theory works but relies on an assumption: small angle of sliding of FPS typed TMD. In the analysis of parameters, it shows that vibration suppression is very sensitive to frequency ratio, but not to friction parameters. In case study, once the TMD is properly designed, no matter fixed or variable FPS typed TMD, the requirement of comfort for Taipei 101 can be satisfied such that the peak acceleration of roof is reduced to less than 5 gal, and the variable FPS typed TMD is most effective one. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T15:19:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R95521212-1.pdf: 1778941 bytes, checksum: 8027c3b512bff9b6f290dffd86fbdd4a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書............................................ I
誌謝.......................................... II 摘要........................................ III 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究動機及目的 1 1.2 文獻回顧 3 1.3 本文內容 6 第二章 摩擦鐘擺型TMD之動力行為 9 2.1 結構動力系統 9 2.2 結構加裝FPS型TMD之動力系統 10 2.3 FPS型TMD之摩擦行為與摩擦力計算 14 第三章 最佳化理論 19 3.1 設計參數與最佳化目標函數 19 3.2 最佳化理論 21 3.3 數值計算程式 26 第四章 最佳化參數分析 33 4.1 臺北101結構系統簡介 33 4.2 單自由度化結構並加裝單一FPS型TMD 33 4.3 可行性驗證 35 4.4 參數分析 36 第五章 案例分析 43 5.1 臺北101的數值模擬 43 5.2 單自由度化結構加裝FPS型TMD之案例分析與比較 44 第六章 結論與展望 49 6.1 結論 49 6.2 展望 51 參考文獻 53 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 摩擦鐘擺型調諧質塊阻尼器之最佳化設計研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Optimal Design of Friction Pendulum System Typed Tuned Mass Damper | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 鍾立來 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳永詳,盧煉元,李姿瑩 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 結構控制,調諧質塊阻尼器,非線性,摩擦鐘擺系統, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | structural control,tuned mass damper (TMD),nonlinear,FPS, | en |
dc.relation.page | 55 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2008-07-24 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-97-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.74 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。