請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/3684
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 張文貞 | |
dc.contributor.author | Tzu-Ging Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳子珺 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-13T08:35:56Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-08-26 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-13T08:35:56Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2016-08-26 | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016-08-19 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 壹、 中文文獻
ㄧ、書籍 姜皇池(2013)。《國際公法導論》。台北:新學林。 約翰.米爾斯海默( John J. Mearsheimer)(2014新版)。《大國政治的悲劇》(The Tragedy of Great Power Politics),王義桅、唐小松譯。台北:麥田。 倪世雄 (2003)。《當代國際關係理論》。 台北:五南。 二、期刊 鄭端耀(2005)。〈國際關係新古典實主義的理論〉。《問題與研究》,44卷1期。 鄭端耀(2003)。〈國際關係攻勢與守勢現實主義理論爭辯之評析〉。《問題與研究》,42卷2期。 鄭端耀(2000)。〈核不擴散建制的運作與發展〉。《問題與研究》,39卷4期。 袁易(2005)。〈「不擴散核武器條約」之再審視:一個權力政治與身分政治的解析〉。《問題與研究》,44卷4期。 國際法判例研究會(2008),〈利比亞與查德領土爭端案〉,5卷2期。 三、論文 李佩蓉(2013)。《程序環境人權在區域組織的建構與發展:歐盟與東協的比較與反思》,國立台灣大學法律系碩士論文。 陳文葳(2015)。《政府間氣候變遷小組的建構、組織與功能演變:以跨國法制歷程觀點分析》。 貳、英文文獻 一、 書籍 BUZAN, BARRY. et al. (eds.)(1993), NEO-REALISM TO STRUCTURAL REALISM. CORTIGHT, DAVID. (ed.) (1997), THE PRICE OF PEACE. DONNELLY, JACK. (2000), REALISM AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS. HATHAWAY A. OONA & KOH,HAROLD. (eds.) (2005), FOUNDATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND POLITICS. JOYNER. H, DANIEL. (2011), INTERPRETING THE NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION TREATY. KROENIG, MATTHEW. et al. (eds.) (1992), THE CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION, IN CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION. KOPPE, ERIK. (2008), THE USE OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS AND THE PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT DURING INTERNATIONAL ARMED CONFLICT. LOBELL.E, STEVEN. et al. (eds.)(2009), THE STATE, AND FOREIGN POLICY. MORGENTHAU. J, HANS. (1967), POLITICS AMONG NATIONS: THE STRUGGLE FOR POWER AND PEACE. MAERLI. B, MORTEN & LODGAARD SVERRE. (ed). (2007), NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION AND INTERNATIONAL SECURITY. PILAT, JOESPH. (2007), ATOMS FOR PEACE: A FUTURE AFTER FIFTY YEARS? RUBLEE. R, MARIA & THAKUR, RAMESH. (ed.)(2014), NUCLEAR POLITICS VOLUME II. RUBLEE. R, MARIA & THAKUR, RAMESH. (ed.)(2014), NUCLEAR POLITICS VOLUME III. REISS, MITCHELL & LITWAK. S , ROBERT. (ed.)(1994), NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION AFTER COLD WAR. WENDT, ALEXANDER. (1999), SOCIAL THEORY OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICS. 二、 期刊 Davis.S, Zachary (1993), The Realist Nuclear Regime, 2(3), Security Studies 79. Hirsch, Theodore (2004), The IAEA Additional Protocol: What it is and Why it Matters, Fall- Winter The Non Proliferation Review 143. Koh, Harold (1996), Transnational Legal Process, 75, Nebraska Law Review 181. Koh, Harold (1997), Why Do Nations Obey International Law? 106, Yale Law Review 2600. Koh, Harold (2004), Jefferson Memorial Lecture- Transnational Legal Process after September 11th , 22(3) ,Berkeley Journal of International Law 337. Moshurzaden, Homeira (2007), Discursive Foundation of Iran’s Nuclear Policy, 38(4), Security Dialogues 521. Mearsheimer.J, John (1990), Back to the Future: Instability in Europe After Cold War, 15(1)International Security 5. White.O, Tanya (1996), Is There a Theory of Nuclear Proliferation? An Analysis of the Contemporary Debate, 4(1), The Nonproliferation Review 43. Waltz, Kenneth (1981), The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: More Maybe Better, 21(171), Adelphi Papers 1. Waltz, Kennth (1990), Nuclear Myths and Political Realities, 84(3) , American Political Science Review 730. Wendt, Alexander (1992), Anarchy is What States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics, 46(2), International Organization 391. 三、 條約與協議 Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (1968). The Statute of International Atomic Energy Agency (1958). The Structure And Content of Agreements Between The Agency And States Required In Connection With The Treaty On The Non-Proliferation Of Nuclear Weapons (1972). Model Protocol Additional To The Agreement(s) Between State(s) And The International Atomic Energy Agency For The Application Of Safeguards (1997). 四、 聯合國文件 United Nations General Assembly First Committee, Establishment of a Commission to Deal with the Problems Raised by the Discover of Atomic Energy under UNGA, A/RES/1/1 (January 24, 1946). United Nations General Assembly Fourteenth Session, Prevention of the Wider Dissemination of Nuclear Weapons under UNGA, A/RES/1380/14 (November 20, 1959). United Nations General Assembly Fifteenth Session, Prevention of the Wider Dissemination of Nuclear Weapons under UNGA, A/RES/1576/15 ( December 20, 1960). United Nations General Assembly Sixteenth Session, Prevention of the Wider Dissemination of Nuclear Weapons under UNGA, A/RES/1665/16 ( December 4, 1961). Security Council, Situation Concerning Iran Non-Proliferation under UNSC S/RES/1696 (July 1, 2006). Security Council, Situation Concerning Iran Non-Proliferation under UNSC S/RES/1737 (December 27, 2006). Security Council, Non-Proliferation under UNSC S/RES/1747 (March 24, 2007). 五、 網路 Dwight D. Eisenhower, Atoms For Peace, https://www.iaea.org/about/history/atoms-for-peace-speech Hiroshima & Nagasaki, 70 years on, survivors and their families still gravely affected, https://www.icrc.org/en/hiroshima-nagasaki Frank Aiken, https://www.dfa.ie/media/dfa/alldfawebsitemedia/ourrolesandpolicies/disarmament-frank-aiken-speech-1958.pdf IAEA, https://www.iaea.org/about/memberstates Iran Nuclear Deal: Well begun, not nearly done, http://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21590959-encouraging-interim-deal-iran-makes-permanent-check-its-nuclear-ambitions-easier Machiavelli, The Prince. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/1232/1232-h/1232-h.htm#link2HCH0018. 2010 Nuclear Posture Review Report, http://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/features/defenseReviews/NPR/2010_Nuclear_Posture_Review_Report.pdf 2010 Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) Review Conference: Key Issues and Implications, https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/nuke/R41216.pdf The Status of Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty: Signatories and Rectifier, https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/ctbtsig 六、 其他 Gademaker. G, Statement at the 2005 Review Conference of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (May 2, 2005). | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/3684 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 反核子擴散條約自生效至今,已逾四十年。這四十年當中因著條約而生的區域條約、國際組織、政府間組織、非政府組織不勝枚舉,且這些組織和條約皆是為了強化反核子擴散條約的規範範圍,藉以達成防止核武擴散、促成軍備裁撤、推廣核能和平使用的目的。反核子擴散條約共十一條條文,且未有任何違反條約的制裁規定,甚至其防護措施需全然仰仗國際原子能總署的防護協定。然而,條約生效至今曾使部分國家放棄核武加入條約、亦曾透過審查會、國際組織、非政府組織的互動下勸使違約的締約國重回談判桌,縱使條約有其為人詬病之處,仍在反核武擴散的領域裡扮演舉足輕重的地位。國際法理論諸如現實主義與建構主義,皆對反核子擴散條約的談判、生效、實踐有各自大相逕庭的見解與剖析,但兩者皆未能整全的描繪條約中不同行動者間的互動與衝突,以及行動者們如何回應非締約國、違反條約的締約國之動態歷程。因此,透過運用另一個近似於建構主義的跨國規範化歷程的理論特徵,將更能勾勒出跨國行動者的塑像,以及行動者們透藉由互動、規範詮釋,而將規範價值內化在內國決策程序裡。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | It has been over four decades since the enactment of the Treaty on Non-proliferation of the Nuclear Weapons (NPT). During these years, various bilateral, multilateral agreements, regional treaties have been drafted and enacted, for the purpose of strengthening the regulative scope of the NPT. Other than the treaties and agreements mentioned above, international organizations, inter-governmental organizations, and related non-governmental organizations have also played crucial roles in monitoring or promoting the execution of the NPT. International law theories, such as realism and constructivism, have analyzed the factors that triggered States to comply with the treaty respectively based on their distinct viewpoints. However, both realism and constructivism have failed to comprehensively demonstrate the factors and actors that urge States to not only comply, but also obey the NPT. Hence, the application of transnational legal process can lead to a more persuasive interpretation on how transnational actors have pushed States to interact, interpret, and internalize the norms in the NPT. Through depicting the images of the transnational actors, and the dynamic legal process, the blueprint of States’ diplomatic decisions can be thereof manifested. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-13T08:35:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R02a41032-1.pdf: 1492717 bytes, checksum: dbcafb58ab817dcf912769c221ac19ea (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
誌謝 i 摘要 v Abstract vi 1. 緒論 1 1.1. 研究緣起 1 1.2. 問題意識 3 1.3. 研究方法 4 1.4. 研究範圍 8 2. 文獻回顧 10 2.1. 現實主義的理論基礎 10 2.1.1. 古典現實主義 11 2.1.2. 結構現實主義 13 2.2. 建構主義的理論基礎 16 2.3. 跨國規範化歷程(Transnational Legal Process)的理論基礎 18 2.4. 小結 21 3. 反核子擴散條約的規範結構 23 3.1. 歷史脈絡:從談判到生效 23 3.2. 條約決策主體 25 3.3. 條文架構分析 26 3.3.1. 條約參與主體之區別義務 26 3.3.2. 條約目標:核能和平與核武軍備裁撤 27 3.3.3. 管制結構 28 3.3.3.1. 管制目的 28 3.3.3.2. 管制手段 29 3.3.4. 參與及決策模式 30 3.4. 小結 31 4. 反核子擴散條約的規範理論:現實主義、建構主義及跨國規範化歷程 32 4.1. 現實主義與反核子擴散條約 32 4.1.1. 華茲的嚇阻理論 33 4.1.2. 戴維斯的現實主義 35 4.1.3. 現實主義的論述限制 38 4.2. 建構主義與反核子擴散條約 40 4.2.1. 泰能沃德的禁止核武使用與國家認同 43 4.2.2. 建構主義的論述限制 45 4.3. 跨國規範化歷程與反核子擴散條約 46 4.4. 小結 54 5. 反核子擴散條約的跨國規範化歷程分析:以行動者為中心 56 5.1. 不結盟國到新政策聯盟:國家聯盟的合縱連橫 56 5.2. 國際原子能總署:國際政府組織之功能變遷 61 5.3. 核供應者團體與桑格委員會:政府間組織之輔助地位 64 5.4. 和平基地與核裁軍議會政策聯盟:非政府組織之角色 66 5.5. 中東非核區條約之推動:規範機制中的非締約國 68 5.6. 小結 73 6. 結論 75 7. 參考文獻 79 8. 附錄 84 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 反核子擴散條約之規範機制:以跨國規範化歷程為分析途徑 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Norm-Based Mechanism of Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons : An Approach from Transnational Legal Process Theory | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 姜皇池,陳貞如 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 反核子擴散條約,現實主義,建構主義,跨國規範化歷程,跨國行動者, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons,Realism,Constructivism,Transnational Legal Process,Transnational Actors, | en |
dc.relation.page | 90 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201603090 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-08-19 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 法律學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 科際整合法律學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 科際整合法律學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-105-1.pdf | 1.46 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。