Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/36621Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 蕭朱杏(Chu-Hsing Kate Hsiao) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cheng-Hong Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林政宏 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T08:08:12Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2005-08-03 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2005-08-03 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2005-07-21 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 溫淑惠. 2004. 大型資料相關性研究之多重檢定問題. 國立台灣大學公共衛生學院流行病學研究所生物醫學統計組博士論文.
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 57:289-300. Bradley GW. 1993. Disease Diagnosis and Decision. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Brookes AJ. 1999. The essence of SNPs. Gene 234:177-186. Cardon LR, Bell JI. 2001. Association study designs for complex diseases. Nature Reviews Genetics 2:91-99. Carlson CS, Eberle MA, Kruglyak L, Nickerson DA. 2004. Mapping complex disease loci in whole-genome association studies. Nature 49: 446-52. Collins A, Lonjou C, Morton NE. 1999. Genetic epidemiology of single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96:15173-7. Dale RN. 2004. A simple correction for multiple testing for single-nucleotide polymorphisms in linkage disequilibrium with each other. American Journal of Human Genetics 74:765-9. Dudoit S, Shaffer JP, Boldrick JC. 2003. Multiple hypothesis testing in microarray experiments. Statistical Science 18:71-103. Ewens WJ, Spielman RS. 2001. Locating genes by linkage and association. Theoretical Population Biology 60:135-9. Greenberg RS, Daniels SR, Flanders WD, Eley JW, Boring JR. 2001. Medical Epidemiology. London: Lange-McGraw-Hill. Gu HF. 2001. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and SNP databases. Chin J Med Genet 18:478-80. Hao K, Xu X, Laird N, Wang X, Xu X. 2004. Power estimation of multiple SNP association test of case-control study and application. Genetic Epidemiology 26:22-30. Heggarty S, et al. 2003. A genome wide scan for association with multiple sclerosis in a N. Irish case control population. Journal of Neuroimmunology 143: 93-96. Holland BS, Copenhaver MD. 1988. Improved Bonferroni-type multiple testing procedures. Psychological Bulletins 104:145-9. Holm S. 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6:65-70. Hochberg Y, Tamhane AC. 1987. Multiple comparison procedures. New York: Wiley. Hochberg Y. 1988. A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 75:800-2. Johnson GCL, Todd JA. 2002. Strategies in complex disease mapping. Trends in Genetics 18:s25-s29. Linn S. 2004. A new conceptual apporach to teaching the interpretation of clinical tests. Journal of Statistics Education 12(3). Reich DE, Gabriel SB, Altshuler D. 2003. Quality and completeness of SNP databases. Nature Genetics 33:457-8. Risch NJ, Merikangas K. 1996. The future of genetic studies of complex human diseases. Science 273:1516-7. Riva A, Kohane IS. 2004. A SNP-centric database for the investigation of the human genome. BioMedCentral Bioinformatics 5: 33. Sachidanandam R, et al. 2001. A map of human genome sequence variation containing 1.42 million single nucleotide polymorphisms. Nature 409:928-33. Satagopan JM, Verbel DA, Venkatraman ES, Offit KE, Begg CB. 2002. Two-stage designs for gene-disease association studies. Biometrics 58:163-70. Satagopan JM, Venkatraman ES, Begg CB. 2004. Two-stage designs for gene-disease association studies with sample size constraints. Biometrics 60: 589-97. Shaffer JP. 1995. Modified sequentially rejective mulitple test procedures. Journal of American Statistical Association 81:826-31. Shaffer JP. 1995. Multiple hypothesis testing. Annual Review of Psychology 46:561-84. Shi MM. 2002. Technologies for individual genotyping: detection of genetic polymorphisms in drug targets and disease genes. American Journal of Pharmacogenomics 2:197-205. Simes RJ. 1986. An improved Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 73:751-4. Storey JD. 2002. A direct approach to false discovery rates. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 64:479-98. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/36621 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 多重檢定問題的產生,是由於同時進行多個檢定的推論。主要的考量在於避免犯型一錯誤與型二錯誤,也就是控制偽陽率及提升檢定力。隨著檢定的個數變大,犯型一錯誤的機會也增加。傳統的Bonferroni方法雖然可以有效的控制型一錯誤,但是嚴格的顯著水準卻造成了型二錯誤的增加。在利用SNP作為相關性研究的材料,以尋找可能的基因位置時,提升檢定力是較為重要的考量,以利於找出有可能的基因位置。本論文針對多重檢定的二階段設計進行研究,在給定的條件之下,藉著演算的方式求出檢定力與偽陽率,並且透過模擬研究,來分析影響檢定表現的因素。本論文主要目的在提出二階段設計方式的建議,包括第一階段顯著水準建議設為0.05,以及整合性的樣本數估計方法等。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Multiple testing problem occurs when the simultaneous inference of multiple statistical tests is of interest. Two major concerns when design with multiple testing are type I error and power. In other words, a large power under limited false positive rate is the focus. However, as the number of tests increases, the overall false positive rate increases. Traditional Bonferroni’s method is conservative and controls overall false positve rate well. Consequently, its overall power is usually small. In association studies using SNP’s as genetic markers, it is common that the statistical power becomes more important than the type I error. This thesis focuses on a two stage design for multiple hypothesis testing. I will present the exact calculation of power and false positive rate under given conditions. An efficient algorithm for computation will also be presented. Analysis of possible influential factors will be investigated through simulation studies. Recommendations for the two stage design will be suggested, including choice of the sample size and using 0.05 as the first stage significance level. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T08:08:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-94-R92842020-1.pdf: 1134842 bytes, checksum: c232b3db29f6f89e2bc9736fd1ca253f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 多重檢定問題與相關性研究的背景 1
第一節 遺傳資料相關性研究的背景介紹 1 第二節 相關性研究所引發的多重檢定問題 6 第三節 本論文的研究方向 11 第二章 符號定義 13 第三章 多重檢定的二階段設計 19 第一節 二階段設計的目標與檢定流程 19 第二節 檢定統計量與其漸近分布 23 第三節 檢定力與偽陽率的計算 28 第四節 以數值方法計算檢定力與錯誤率 34 第四章 分析影響檢定力與偽陽率的因素及樣本數的估計 45 第一節 影響檢定力的因素 45 第二節 影響偽陽率的因素 64 第三節 進入第二階段檢定個數與檢定表現 73 第四節 樣本數的估計 86 第五章 模擬研究 95 第一節 模擬方法與流程 95 第二節 二階段法與Bonferroni法之比較 97 第三節 影響二階段法表現的因素 104 第六章 討論與建議 115 第一節 討論 115 第二節 二階段設計的建議 121 第三節 未來展望 124 參考文獻 127 附錄 132 附錄一 P1、P2與PA的計算程式 132 附錄二 模擬用程式 135 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 樣本數估計 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Bonferroni法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 設計方法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 偽陽率 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 偽陰率 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 多重檢定 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 兩階段法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Multiple testing | en |
| dc.subject | Two-stage method | en |
| dc.subject | TPR | en |
| dc.subject | Bonferroni method | en |
| dc.subject | Design | en |
| dc.subject | FPR | en |
| dc.subject | Sample size estimation | en |
| dc.title | 二階段多重檢定之設計 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Design Consideration of a Two-Stage Multiple Testing Procedure | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 93-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 溫淑惠(Shu-Hui Wen),張淑惠(Shu-Hui Chang),戴政(John Jen Tai) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Bonferroni法,多重檢定,兩階段法,偽陰率,偽陽率,設計方法,樣本數估計, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Bonferroni method,Design,FPR,Multiple testing,Sample size estimation,TPR,Two-stage method, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 140 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2005-07-21 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 流行病學研究所 | zh_TW |
| Appears in Collections: | 流行病學與預防醫學研究所 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-94-1.pdf Restricted Access | 1.11 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
