Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 商學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/36486
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor簡怡雯
dc.contributor.authorShu-Wei Linen
dc.contributor.author林淑微zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-13T08:02:38Z-
dc.date.available2005-07-28
dc.date.copyright2005-07-28
dc.date.issued2005
dc.date.submitted2005-07-22
dc.identifier.citationChapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (1994). The limits of anchoring. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7, 223-242.
Herr, P. M. (1983). On the consequence of Priming: Assimilation and Contrast Effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 323-340.
Herr, P. M. (1989). Priming Price: Prior Knowledge and Context Effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 67-75.
Hovland, C.I., & Weiss, W. (1995). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 635-650.
Lewan, P. C., & Stotland, E. (1961). The effects of prior information on susceptibility to an emotional appeal. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 450-453.
Lorge, I. (1936). Prestige, suggestion, and attitudes. Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 386-402.
Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (1999). Hypothesis-consistent testing and semantic priming in the anchoring paradigm: A selective accessibility model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 136-164.
Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (2000). Numerical judgments under uncertainty: The role of knowledge in anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 495-518.
Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). New York: Academic Press.
Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T. & Schumann D. (1986). Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 135-146.
Quattrone, G. A., Lawerence, C. P., Finkel, S. E., & Andrus, D. C. (1984). Explorations in anchoring: The effects of prior range, anchor extremity, and suggestive hints. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Schwarz, N. (1994). Judgment in social context: Biases, shortcomings, and the logic of conversation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol.26,pp. 125-162). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Stapel, D. A., Koomen, W., & Velthuijsen, A. S. (1998). Assimilation or Contrast?: Comparison Relevance, Distinctness, and the Impact of Accessible Information on Consumer Judgments. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7, 1-24.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1130.
Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1997). The Fexible correction model: The role of naive theories of bias in bias correction. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 141-208). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wegener, D. T., & Bedell, B., Petty, R. E., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1997, May). Perceptions of anchor plausibility as a mediator of knowledge effects on anchoring. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.
Wegener, D. T., & Bedell, B., Petty, R. E., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (2001). Implications of Attitude Change Theories for Numerical Anchoring: Anchor Plausibility and the Limits of Anchor Effectiveness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 62-69.
Wegener, D. T., & Fabrigar, L. R. (2000) Analysis and design for non-experimental data: Addressing casual and noncasual hypotheses. In H.T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 412-450) New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Wilson, T. D., Houston, C. E., Etling, K. M., & Brekke, N. (1996). A new look at anchoring effects: Basic anchoring and its antecedents. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology: General, 125, 387-402.
Wood, W. (1982). Retrieval of attitude-relevant information from memory: Effects on susceptibility to persuasion and on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 798-910.
Wyer, R. S. (1973). Category ratings as “subjective expected values”: Implications for attitude formation and change. Psychological Review, 80, 446-467.
Yi,Youjae (1990). The effects of contextual priming in print advertisements. Journal of Consumer Research., 17, 215-222.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/36486-
dc.description.abstractNumerical anchoring has been found to depend on the extremity of the anchor, the anchor perceived plausible or implausible, the judge’s knowledge toward target judgment, and expertise of the source of the anchor. Two experiments were conducted to study these striking parallels. In experiment one, the relations of anchor extremity and the judge’s knowledge were investigated. Three levels of anchor extremity were adopted —moderate, extreme, and very extreme anchors. We hypothesized that for high knowledge judges, anchoring effects increased when moderate anchors were used and decreased when extreme anchor or very extreme anchors were used; for low knowledge judges, anchoring effects increased when moderate anchors or extreme anchor were used and decreased when very extreme anchors were used. In experiment two, the relation of anchor extremity and expertise of the source of the anchor were investigated. Two levels of anchor extremity were adopted —moderate and extreme anchors. We hypothesized that for high source expertise of the anchor, extreme anchors would lead to larger anchoring effects than moderate anchors; for low source expertise of the anchor, extreme anchors would lead to smaller anchoring effects than moderate anchors. Though the results partly confirmed our prediction, the findings are consistent with our inference. Implications of numerical anchoring are discussed.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T08:02:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-94-R92741056-1.pdf: 922123 bytes, checksum: ff9a4807f6940b81d8f7ebc84cf069ab (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2005
en
dc.description.tableofcontentsAbstract I
Table of Contents II
Table of Attached Figure III
Table of Attached Table IV
Chapter I Study Purpose 1
Chapter II Literature Review 2
2-1 Anchoring 2
2-2 Underlying mechanism of anchoring 4
2-3 Anchor extremity and anchoring 5
2-4 Prior knowledge and Anchoring 7
2-5 Source credibility and Anchoring 10
Chapter III Proposed Theory and Hypotheses 12
3-1 Proposed Theory 12
3-2 Hypotheses 15
3-3 Uniqueness of current study 16
Chapter IV Experiment and Result 17
4-1 Experiment 1 17
4-1-1 Pretest 17
4-1-2 Main Experiment 18
4-2 Experiment 1 Results 21
4-2-1 Knowledge measure 21
4-2-2 Dependent measures 21
4-3 Experiment 2 28
4-3-1 Pretest 28
4-3-2 Main Experiment 29
4-4 Experiment 2 Results 31
4-4-1 Manipulation check 31
4-4-2 Dependent measures 31
Chapter V Discussion 38
5-1 Conclusion 38
5-2 Limitation 39
5-3 Implication 39
5-4 Future research direction 41
REFERENCES 42
Appendix 1: Pretest Questionnaire 44
Appendix 2: Main Experiment Questionnaire 48
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject代言人zh_TW
dc.subject知識zh_TW
dc.subject矛的極端度範圍zh_TW
dc.subject定錨效果zh_TW
dc.subjectsource credibilityen
dc.subjectanchoring effecten
dc.subjectanchor plausibilityen
dc.subjectknowledgeen
dc.titleNumerical Anchoring Effects:
The influences of Anchor Plausibility, Product Knowledge and Source Credibility on Products Perceptions
en
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear93-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee練乃華,蕭中強
dc.subject.keyword定錨效果,知識,代言人,矛的極端度範圍,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordanchoring effect,anchor plausibility,knowledge,source credibility,en
dc.relation.page54
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2005-07-22
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept商學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:商學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-94-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
900.51 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved