Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/35931Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 紀蔚然 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu-Jing Wang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 王于菁 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T07:48:23Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2005-08-01 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2005-08-01 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2005-07-26 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 引用書目
一、英文書目 Arrowsmith, William. “Euripides’ Theater of Ideas.” Euripides: A Collection of Critical Essays. Ed. Erich Segal. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1968. 13-33. Brockett, Oscar G. History of the theatre. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1991. Brooker, Peter. Bertolt Brecht: Dialectics, Poetry, Politics. London; New York: Croom Helm, 1998. Collard, C. “Formal Debates in Euripides’ Drama.” Euripides. Ed. Judith Mossman. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003. 64-80. Conacher, D. J. “Rhetoric and Relevance in Euripidean Drama.” in Euripides. Ed. Judith Mossman. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003. 81-101. Demetz, Peter. Brecht: A Collection of Critical Essays. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1962. Euripides. Alcestis. Trans. William Arrowsmith. New York: Oxford University Press, 1974. ---. Andromache. Euripides, 1. Ed. David R. Slavitt and Palmer Bowie. Trans. Donald Junkins. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1998. 147-213. ---. Bakkhai. Trans. Reginald Gibbons. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2001. ---. Daughters of Troy. Euripides, 3. Ed. David R. Slavitt and Palmer Bowie. Trans. Mark Rudman and Katharine Washburn. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1998. 61-136. ---. Electra. Euripides V. Ed. David Grene and Richmond Lattimore. Trans. Emily Townsend Vermeule. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969. 1-66. ---. Hecuba. Euripides, 1. Ed. David R. Slavitt and Palmer Bowie. Trans. Marilyn Nelson. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, c 1998. 71-146. ---. Helen. Trans. James Michie and Colin Leach. New York: Oxford University Press, 1981. ---. Heracles. Euripides II. Ed. David Grene and Richmond Lattimore. Trans. William Arrowsmith. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969. 43-115. ---. Hippolytos. Trans. Robert Bagg. New York: Oxford University Press, 1973. ---. Ion. Euripides III. Ed. David Grene and Richmond Lattimore. Trans. R. F. Willetts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958. 177-255. ---. Iphigeneia at Aulis. Trans. W. S. Merwin and George E. Dimock, JR. New York: Oxford University Press, 1978. ---. Iphigeneia in Tauris. Trans. Richmond Lattimore. New York: Oxford University Press, 1973. ---. Medea. Euripides I. Ed. David Grene and Richmond Lattimore. Trans. R. Warner. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958. 56-108. ---. Orestes. Euripides IV. Ed. David Grene and Richmond Lattimore. Trans. William Arrowsmith. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958. 105-208. ---. Suppliant Women. Trans. Rosanna Warren and Stephen Scully. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995. ---. The Children of Heracles. Trans. Henry Taylor and Robert A. Brooks. New York: Oxford University Press, 1981. ---. The Phoenician Women. Trans. Peter Burian and Brian Swann. New York: Oxford University Press, 1981. Gamel, Mary-Kay. “Performing Euripides.” Approaches to Teaching the Dramas of Euripides. Ed. Robin Mitchell-Boyask. New York: Modern Language Association of America, 2002. 70-84. Goldhill, Simon. Reading Greek Tragedy. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1986. Gregory, Justina. Euripides and the Instruction of The Athenians. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1991. Grote, Dale. “The Poetics in Euripides’s Green Room?” Approaches to Teaching the Dramas of Euripides. Ed. Robin Mitchell-Boyask. New York: Modern Language Association of America, 2002. 121-29. Grube, G. M. A. “Euripides and the Gods.” Euripides: A Collection of Critical Essays. Ed. Erich Segal. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc, 1968. 34-50. Halleran, Michael R. “Euripidean Stagecraft.” Approaches to Teaching the Dramas of Euripides. Ed. Robin Mitchell-Boyask. New York: Modern Language Association of America, 2002. 85-94. Hutcheon, Linda. A Theory of Parody. New York: Methuen, 1985. Knox, Bernard. “Euripides: The Poet as Prophet.” Directions in Euripidean Criticism: A Collection of Essays. Ed. Peter Burian. Durham, N. C.: Duke University Press, 1985. 1-12. Lefkowitz, Mary R. “ ‘Impiety’ and ‘Atheism’ in Euripides’ Drama.” Euripides. Ed. Judith Mossman. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003. 102-21. Lloyd, Michael. The Agon in Euripides. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992. Marshall, C. W. “Alcestis and The Problem of Prosatyric Drama.” The Classical Journal v.95 no3（Feb.�Mar. 2000）, 229-38. McClure, Laura. “At Home and Not at Home: Euripides as a Comic Character.” Approaches to Teaching the Dramas of Euripides. Ed. Robin Mitchell-Boyask. New York: Modern Language Association of America, 2002. 130-39. Meltzer, Gary. S. “The Importance of Debate in Euripides—and of Debating Euripides.” Approaches to Teaching the Dramas of Euripides. Ed. Robin Mitchell-Boyask. New York: Modern Language Association of America, 2002. 103-11. Michelini, Ann N. “Modern Views of Euripides.” Approaches to Teaching the Dramas of Euripides. Ed. Robin Mitchell-Boyask. New York: Modern Language Association of America, 2002. 51-59. Miller, Arthur. “The Nature of Tragedy.” The Theater Essays of Arthur Miller. Ed. Robert A.Martin. Harmondsworth, Eng.; New York: Penguin Books, 8-11. ---. “Tragedy and the Common Man.” The Theater Essays of Arthur Miller. Ed. Robert A. Martin. Harmondsworth, Eng.; New York: Penguin Books, 3-7. Morewood, James. The Plays of Euripides. London: Bristol Classical Press, 2002. Mossman, Judith. “Introduction” Euripides. Ed. Judith Mossman. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003. 1-15. Pucci, Pietro. “Euripides: The Monument and the Sacrifice.” Euripides. Ed. Judith Mossman. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003. 139-69. Reckford, Kenneth J. “Concepts of Demoralization in the Hecuba.” Directions in Euripidean Criticism: A Collection of Essays. Ed. Peter Burian. Durham, N. C.: Duke University Press, 1985. 112-28. Reinhardt, Karl. “The Intellectual Crisis in Euripides.” Euripides. Ed. Judith Mossman. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003. 16-46. Segal, Charles. “The Bacchae as Metatragedy.” Directions in Euripidean Criticism: A Collection of Essays. Ed. Peter Burian. Durham, N. C.: Duke University Press, 1985. 156-74. Segal, Erich. “Introduction.” Euripides: A Collection of Critical Essays. Ed. Erich Segal. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc., 1968. 1-12. Stahl, H. P. “On ‘Extra-Dramatic’ Communication of Characters in Euripides.” Euripides. Ed. Judith Mossman. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003. 122-38. Taplin, Oliver.“Emotion and Meaning in Greek Tragedy.” Greek Tragedy in Action. London: Methuen, 1978. 159-71. Williams, Raymond. Modern Tragedy. Stanford California: Stanford University Press,1966. Smith, Wesley D. “The Ironic Structure in Alcestis” Twentieth Century Interpretations of Euripides’ Alcestis. Ed. Wilson, John R. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall Inc., 1968. 37-56. Winnington-Ingram, R. P. “Euripides: Poietes Sophos.” Euripides. Ed. Judith Mossman. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003. 47-63. 二、中文書目 丁揚中 等譯。《布萊希特論戲劇》。布萊希特（Brecht）原著。北京市：中國戲劇出版 社，1990。 朱光潛。《悲劇心理學：各種悲劇快感理論的批判研究》。台北市：蒲公英出版社，1984。 周國平 譯。《悲劇的誕生》。尼采（Nietzsche）原著。台北市：久大印行，1990。 林國源。《古希臘劇場美學》。台北市：書林出版有限公司，2000。 林國源 譯。《蛙》。亞里斯多芬尼斯（Aristophanes）原著。《世界名劇精選【古典篇】》。 台北市：志文出版社，1999。217-90。 胡耀恆 譯。《詩學》。亞里斯多德（Aristotle）原著。台北市：中外文學第十六卷•第四 期，1987。4-37。 高天安 譯。《論喜劇》。麥金特（W. Moelwyn Merchant）原著。台北市：黎明出版社， 1973。 劉康。《對話的喧聲：巴赫汀文化理論述評》。台北：麥田出版社，1995。 劉景輝 譯。《古代希臘史與羅馬共和史》。張柏斯（Mortimer Chambers）原著。台北 市：台灣學生出版社，1989。 錢中文 主編。《巴赫金全集 第六卷：拉伯雷的創作與中世紀和文藝復興時期的民間文 化》。巴赫汀（Bakhtin）原著。石庄市：河北教育出版社，1998。 錢競、劉雁濱 譯。《後設小說：自我意識小說的理論與實踐》。渥厄（Patricia Waugh） 原著。台北縣：駱駝出版社，1995。 參考書目 一、英文書目 Bloom, Harold. Euripides : Comprehensive Research and Study Guide. Philadelphia : Chelsea House Publishers, 2003. Collard, C. Euripides. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981. Conacher, D. J. Euripidean Drama : Myth, Theme and Structure. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1967. Diggle, James. Euripidea : Collected Essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press ; New York: Oxford University Press, 1994. Euben, J. Peter. Greek Tragedy and Political Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986. Gregory, Justina. Euripides and the Instruction of the Athenians. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1991. Kastely, James L. Rethinking the Rhetorical Tradition : From Plato to Postmodernism. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1997. Kovacs, David. Euripidea Altera. Leiden ; New York: E.J. Brill, 1996. Murray, Gilbert. Euripides and his age. London: Oxford University Press, 1965. Padilla, Mark W. Rites of Passage in Ancient Greece : Literature, Religion, Society. Lewisburg, Pa.: Bucknell University Press ; London : Associated University Presses, 1999. Segal, Charles. Euripides and the Poetics of Sorrow : Art, Gender, and Commemoration in Alcestis, Hippolytus, and Hecuba. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1993. Sophocles. The Oedipus Plays of Sophocles. Trans. and Ed. Paul Roche. New York: Penguin, 1991. Wohl, Victoria. Intimate Commerce : Exchange, Gender, and Subjectivity in Greek Tragedy. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1998. 二、中文書目 宋碧雲 譯。愛迪絲•赫米爾敦（Edith Hamilton）原著。台北市：志文出版社，1998。 胡耀恆、胡宗文 譯注。《伊底帕斯王》。索發克里斯（Sophocles）原著。台北市：桂冠 出版社，2002。 胡耀恆 譯。《戴神的女信徒們》。尤里比底斯（Euripides）原著。臺北市：行政院國家 科學委員會，2001。 黃毓秀、曾珍珍 譯。《希臘悲劇：阿卡曼儂、伊底帕斯王、米蒂亞》。台北市：書林出 版社，1984。 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/35931 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 尤里比底斯的悲劇常常會獲得荒謬、諷刺、疏離等評價，本論文就以這些評價為中間點，深入分析形成它們疏離特質的成因。這些疏離效果能夠將觀眾的神入情緒適時地打斷，並且喚醒觀眾的自覺意識，讓他們向戲劇裡的事件提出質疑，同時也向戲劇本身提出質疑。論文中再繼而以這些疏離特質為基礎，進一步探討尤里比底斯悲劇的對話性。對話這個概念是擷取自巴赫汀的理論，也就是交流、開放、未完成，至於和對話對象的關係則是你中有我、我中有你的狀態，而尤里比底斯的悲劇便是經由戲擬和後設等手法向正典希臘悲劇展開對話。探討完尤里比底斯悲劇和正典希臘悲劇的對話性之後，接著討論的是它們和時代的對話性。巴赫汀曾經說明對話發生的時機就是社會危機深重、矛盾與衝突激化的時刻，而這個現象也正是尤里比底斯時代的特徵，同時也是他的悲劇要對話的對象之一，從尤里比底斯悲劇中的悲劇英雄以及悲劇快感的消失來看，它們的消失其實是呼應時代的需求和情境。他的悲劇可以說呈現出了一種共享和集體的經驗，是感應結構下自然產生的悲劇型態。因此，其悲劇所標誌的不只是傳統悲劇的沒落，更是新悲劇的誕生。至於從另一面向來觀察，布萊希特對於戲劇所抱持的強烈社會使命感，也和尤里比底斯的悲劇有某種程度的結合。因此在本論文的最後，即以疏離效果所能喚醒的社會現實感和觀眾的自覺意識，引伸出尤里比底斯悲劇和現代的對話關係。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T07:48:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-94-R90129011-1.pdf: 2010803 bytes, checksum: 6aea753da0a3caa8c15fb4605f17c6fd (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
第一章 緒論------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. 第一節 研究動機------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. 第二節 文獻回顧------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. 第三節 研究範圍與研究方法---------------------------------------------------------------- 4. 第二章 展開對話的先行要素——尤里比底斯悲劇中的疏離特質------------------------- 8. 第一節 結構的突兀---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8. 一、 結局的未完成------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8. （一） 機器神 （二） 歡喜結局 二、 爭辯的落空---------------------------------------------------------------------------12. 三、 關係的懸宕---------------------------------------------------------------------------14. 四、 時間線序上的斷層面——等待的靜止狀態------------------------------------15. 第二節 劇情發展的荒謬--------------------------------------------------------------------------17. 一、 角色的不連續-----------------------------------------------------------------------------17. 二、 兩極的對峙--------------------------------------------------------------------------------18. （一） 表象與真實 （二） 生與死 三、 舞台上的荒謬效果-----------------------------------------------------------------------22. 第三節 喜劇元素融合下的詼諧效果----------------------------------------------------------23. 小結------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------27. 第三章 尤里比底斯悲劇與正典希臘悲劇的對話性------------------------------------------29. 第一節 尤里比底斯悲劇與正典希臘悲劇的差異性------------------------------------30. 一、 與希臘悲劇傳統定義的比較------------------------------------------------------31. 二、 新生的悲劇元素--------------------------------------------------------------------------35. （一） 情節和取材的新發展 （二） 人物的新選擇 （三） 不再巍峨的場景 （四） 語言的新用 （五） 神的新意義 （六） 歌隊與使者的式微 第二節 有意識的對話空間------------------------------------------------------------------48. 第三節 後設戲劇的意涵——以《酒神女信徒》為例---------------------------------53. 小結------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------59. 第四章 尤里比底斯悲劇與時代的對話性------------------------------------------------------60. 第一節 時代環境的肌理---------------------------------------------------------------------61. 一、 外交與政治上的崩解---------------------------------------------------------------61. 二、 文化上的變動時期------------------------------------------------------------------62. 第二節 有意識的對話空間------------------------------------------------------------------63. 第三節 新悲劇的誕生------------------------------------------------------------------------75. 一、 悲劇英雄與悲劇快感的消失------------------------------------------------------75. （一） 傳統的悲劇英雄與悲劇快感 （二） 悲劇英雄與悲劇快感的消失 二、 感應結構下的新悲劇---------------------------------------------------------------84. 小結------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------89. 第五章 結論------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------90. 第一節 論文總結------------------------------------------------------------------------------90. 第二節 本論文的侷限與發展---------------------------------------------------------------95. 一、 本論文的侷限------------------------------------------------------------------------95. 二、 尤里比底斯悲劇的新發展---------------------------------------------------------95. 引用書目------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------99. 參考書目-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------104. | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 感應結構 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 尤里比底斯 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 疏離 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 對話性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 希臘悲劇 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 戲擬 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 後設戲劇 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 狂歡節理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | structure of feeling | en |
| dc.subject | Euripides | en |
| dc.subject | alienation | en |
| dc.subject | dialogism | en |
| dc.subject | Greek Tragedy | en |
| dc.subject | parody | en |
| dc.subject | carnival | en |
| dc.title | 尤里比底斯悲劇的對話性 | zh_TW |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 93-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 姜翠芬,劉雪珍 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 尤里比底斯,疏離,對話性,希臘悲劇,戲擬,後設戲劇,狂歡節理論,感應結構, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Euripides,alienation,dialogism,Greek Tragedy,parody,carnival,structure of feeling, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 105 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2005-07-26 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 戲劇學研究所 | zh_TW |
| Appears in Collections: | 戲劇學系 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-94-1.pdf Restricted Access | 1.96 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.