請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/34920
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 駱尚廉 | |
dc.contributor.author | Chia-Ling Chang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 張嘉玲 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T06:36:51Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-01-06 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2006-01-06 | |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2005-11-07 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Abdel-Kader, M. G., Dugdale, D., and Taylor, P. (1998). Investment Decisions in advanced manufacturing technology─ A fuzzy set theory approach. Ashgate publishing company, USA.
Ashraf, M., Loftis, J. C., and Hubbard, K. G. (1997). Application of geostatistics to evaluate partial weather station networks. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Vol. 84, 255-271. Bardossy, A., Bogardi, I., and Duckstein, L. (1990). Fuzzy regression in hydrology. Water Resources Research, Vol. 26(7), 1497-1508. Bartier, P. M. and Keller, C. P. (1996). Multivariate interpolation to incorporate thematic surface data using inverse distance weighting (IDW). Computers & Geosciences, Vol. 22(7), 795-799. Bedient, P. B. and Huber, W. C. (2002). Hydrology and floodplain analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA. Bellman, R. and Zadeh, L. (1970). Decision-Making in a Fuzzy Environment. Management Science, Vol. 17(4), 141-164. Brown, W., and Schueler, T. (1997). National Pollutant Removal Performance Database for Stormwater Best Management Practices. Center for Watershed Protection, Ellicott City, MD, USA. Chaubey, I., Haan, C. T., Grunwald, S., and Salisbury, J. M. (1999). Uncertainty in the model parameters due to spatial variability of rainfall. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 220, 48-61. Cheng, C. H. (1998). A new approach for ranking fuzzy numbers by distance method. Fuzzy sets and systems, Vol. 95, 307-317. Cheng, C. T., Ou, C. P., and Chau, K. W. (2002). Combining a fuzzy optimal model with a genetic algorithm to solve multi-objective rainfall-runoff model calibration. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 268, 72-86. Craig, E. H. and Karen, A. K. (1995). To normalize or not to normalize? Fat is the question. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Vol. 14(5), 801-807. Dijk, A. I. J. M. V., Bruijnzeel, L. A., and Rosewell, C. J. (2002). Rainfall intensity-kinetic energy relationships: a critical literature appraisal. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 261, 1-23. Dirks, K. N., Hay, J. E, Stow, C. D, and Harris, D. (1998). High-resolution studies of rainfall on Norfolk island, Part Ⅱ: Interpolation of rainfall data. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 208, 187-193. Donald, L. P. and Danny, G. M. (1996). Spatial uncertainty analysis: propagation of interpolation errors in spatially distributed models. Ecological Modelling, Vol. 91, 213-229. Donigian, A. S. and Huber, W. C. (1991). Modeling of nonpoint source water quality in urban and non-urban areas. Environmental Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S.EPA, Athens, GA, USA. Faures, J. M., Goodrich, D. C., Woolhiser, D. A., and Sorooshian, S. (1995). Impact of small-scale spatial variability on runoff modeling. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 173, 309-326. Goldberg, D. E. (1989). Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, USA. Goovaerts, P. (2000). Geostatistical approaches for incorporating elevation into the spatial interpolation of rainfall. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 228, 113-129. Grunwald, S. and Frede, H. G. (1999). Using the modified agricultural non-point source pollution model in German watersheds. Catena, Vol. 37, 319-328. Grunwald, S. and Norton, L. D. (2000). Calibration and validation of a non-point source pollution model. Agricultural Water Management, Vol. 45, 17-39. Holland, J. H. (1975). Adaption in natural and artifical systems. University of Michigan Pres, Ann Arbor. Hromadka, T. V. (1996). A rainfall-runoff probabilistic simulation program: 1. Synthetic data generation. Environmental system, Vol. 11(4), 235-242. Hromadka, T. V. (1996). A rainfall-runoff probabilistic simulation program: 2. Synthetic data analysis. Environmental software, Vol. 11(4), 243-249. Hromadka, T. V. and Whitley, R. J. (1989). Stochastic integral equations in rainfall-runoff modeling. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Hulme, M., Conway, D., Jones, P. D., Jiang, T., Barrow, E. M., and Turney, C. (1995). Construction of a 1961-1990 European climatology for climate change modeling and impact application. International Journal of Climatology, Vol. 15, 1333-1363. Kaighn, R. J. (1993). Improvement to Virginia Storm (VAST) Hydrologic Watershed Model including Detention Pond Pollution Routing. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. Klir, G. and Floger, T. A. (1988). Fuzzy sets, Uncertainty, and Information. Prentice-Hall, Inc., NJ, USA. Klir, G. J. and Yuan, B. (1995). Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic-therory and applications. Prentice─Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA. Lagacherie, P., Cazemier, D. R., Vangaans, P. F. M., and Burrough, P. A. (1997). Fuzzy k-means clustering of fields in an elementary catchment and extrapolation to a larger area. Geoderma, Vol. 77, 197-216. Leon, L. F., Lam, D. C., Farquhar, G. J., and Soulis, E. D. (2000). Integration of nonpoint source pollution model with a decision support system. Environmental Modelling & Software, Vol. 15, 249-255. Lung, W. S. (2001). Water Quality Modeling For Wasteload Allocations and TMDLs. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., USA. Mohanned, S. A., Abdallah, I. H. M., Ashraf, A., and Nabil, S. A. (2000). Evaluating sediment yield at King Talal Reservior from landslides along Irbid-Amman Highway. Engineering Geology, Vol. 56, 361-372. Nalder, I. A. and Wein, R. W. (1998). Spatial interpolation of climatic normals: test of a new method in the Canadian boreal forest. Agricultural And Forest Meteorology, Vol. 92, 211-225. Pegram, G. C. and Bath, A. J. (1995). Role of non-point sources in the development of a water quality management plan for the Mgeni River Catchment. Water Science Technology, Vol. 32, 5-6. Perret, J. S. and Prasher, S. O. (1998). Applications of fuzzy-logic in the design of vegetated waterways under uncertainty. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, Vol. 34(6), 1355-1367. Price, D. T., Mckenny, D. W., Nalder, I. A., Hutchinson, M. F., and Kesteven, J. L. (2000). A comparison of two statistical methods for spatial interpolation of Canadian monthly mean climate data. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Vol. 101, 81-94. Schueler, T. (1987). Controlling Urban Runoff: A Practical Manual for Planning and Designing Urban Best Management Practices. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, Washington, D.C., USA. Tabios, G. O. and Salas, J. D. (1985). A comparative analysis of techniques for spatial interpolation of precipitation. Water Resources Research, Vol. 21, 365-380. Tisdale, T. S., Kaighn, R. J., and Yu, S. L. (1996). The Virginia storm (VAST) model for stormwater management ─ User’s Guide version 6.0. University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. Tung, C. P., Hsu, S. Y., Liu, C. M, and Li, J. S. (2003). Application of the genetic algorithm for optimizing operation rules of the LiYuTan reservoir in Taiwan. Journal of the American water resources association, Vol. 39, 649-657. Vicente, L. L. (1996). On the effect of uncertainty in spatial distribution of rainfall on catchment modeling. Catena, Vol. 28, 107-119. Wang, Q. J. (1991). The genetic algorithm and its application to calibrating conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Water Resources Research, Vol. 27(9), 2467-2471. Wanielista, M., Kersten, R. and Eaglin, R. (1997). Hydrology-water quantity and quality control. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 91-96. Ware, C., Knight, W., and Wells, D. (1991). Memory intensive algorithms for multibeam bathymetric data. Computers & Geosciences, Vol. 17(7), 985-993. Wu, S. M., Huang, G. H., and Guo, H. C. (1997). An interactive inexact-fuzzy approach for multiobjective planning of water-resource systems. Water Science and Technology, Vol. 36(5), 235-242. Yu, P. S. and Yang, T. C. (2000). Fuzzy multi-objective function for rainfall-runoff model calibration. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 238, 1-14. Yu, S. L., Stanford, R. L., and Zhai, Y. Y. (2003). Virginia stormwater model for windows ─ User’s Manual version 1.0. University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. Yu, S. L., Zhen, J. X., and Zhai, S. Y. (2003). Development of a stormwater best management practice placement strategy for the Virginia department of transportation.Virginia transportation research council, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. Zadeh, L. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, Vol. 8, 338-353. Zhu, A. X. and Mackay, D. S. (2001). Effects of spatial detail of soil information on watershed modeling. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 248, 54-77. 王如意、易任 (1990),應用水文學,國立編譯館。 余嘯雷、駱尚廉、郭振泰等 (1993),「台灣地區水庫集水區非點源污染控制技術及策略之研究」,行政院國家科學委員會委辦,國立台灣大學環境工程學研究所執行。 林逸群 (2001),「降雨空間變異性對非點源污染推估之影響」,國立交通大學環境工程研究所碩士論文。 林雍富 (2002),「應用BASINS模式於非點源污染傳輸之模擬─以霧社水庫為例」,國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所碩士論文。 胡景堯 (1996),「模糊理論在水庫優化判別上的應用」,國立台灣大學環境工程學研究所碩士論文。 胡嘉齡 (1999),「非點源污染補助方案之效益分析」,國立交通大學環境工程研究所碩士論文。 馬曉峰 (2000),「基因演算法在工程設施配置問題之應用」,私立朝陽大學營建工程系研究所碩士論文。 張敦程 (2002),「模糊聚類演算法應用於高雄海域污染範圍之判定」,國立中山大學海洋環境及工程學系研究所碩士論文。 曹家瑞 (2000),「物流業配送系統之車輛指派與路徑規劃」,國立台北科技大學生物系統工程與管理研究所碩士論文。 郭明杰 (1995),「非點源污染模式水文模擬之探討」,國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所碩士論文。 郭振泰、余嘯雷等 (1994),「水庫湖泊非點性污染研究(一)」,經濟部水資源統一規劃委員會委辦,國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所執行。 郭振泰、余嘯雷等 (1995),「水庫湖泊非點性污染研究(二)」,經濟部水資源統一規劃委員會委辦,國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所執行。 陳明義 (2002),「應用模糊多目標規劃在焚化灰渣資源化管理之研究」,國立台灣大學環境工程學研究所碩士論文。 曾玉津 (2001),「掩埋場模糊多準則決策選址法之研究」,國立台灣大學環境工程學研究所碩士論文。 楊為宗 (2002),「高屏溪洪水演算水文特性之研究,國立屏東科技大學土木工程系研究所碩士論文。 溫清光、余嘯雷、黃家勤、顏有利等 (1995),「非點源污染調查及最佳管理之功能作業(一)」,行政院環境保護署委辦,成功大學環境工程學研究所執行。 溫清光、范正成、鄭克聲等 (2000),流域集水區非點源最佳管理措施之研究,行政院環境保護署委辦,成功大學環境工程、國立台灣大學農業工程、臺北科技大學土木工程系執行。 廖雯慈 (1999),「應用基因演算法求解優先順序旅行推銷員問題」,私立元智大學工業工程研究所碩士論文。 劉紀宏 (2000),「水庫入流污染物負荷量推估方法之研究」,國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所碩士論文。 潘志豪 (1997),「水庫集水區非點污染源控制最佳管理作業之研究」,國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所碩士論文。 蔡政賢 (1993),「多目標非點源污染總量管制策略分析--以寶山水庫的總磷管制為案」,國立交通大學環境工程研究所碩士論文。 謝斌暉 (1999),「暴雨期間河川水質模式設計流量之研究」,國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所碩士論文。 魏敏裕 (1992),「集水區非點源污染之水質模擬─運用AGNPS與GIS」,國立台灣大學農業工程研究所碩士論文。 蘇木春、張孝德 (1999),機器學習:類神經網路、模糊系統以及基因演算法則,全華科技圖書股份有限公司。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/34920 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 在模擬非點源污染的過程中,降雨是相當重要的資訊,採用一個降雨代表值來描述整個集水區之降雨情況,往往會造成流量及非點源污染推估極大的誤差,故近年來已有學者針對此問題進行探討,考慮降雨空間變異性對水質及水量推估的影響。但多數研究在各雨量站降雨資料之權重分配上較不具有彈性,在降雨分區劃分的過程中,描述集水區內各分區之降雨特性時仍稍顯粗糙,且對於各雨量站權重的表現並無一套有系統且合理之給定方式,故勢必造成模擬推估結果與實際情況間之誤差。為減少此誤差且讓流量及非點源污染量推估與實際情況更相符,本研究由傳統反距離指數法的概念出發,發展一套模糊化修正式反距離指數法,應用模糊理論(Fuzzy theory)中隸屬度的概念,分析降雨在集水區中之空間變異性。並採用WinVAST模式進行流量及非點源污染量之模擬與推估,將整個集水區依據地形再劃分為數個子流域,以各子流域區塊為各別輸入的單位,透過更詳盡地輸入資料,且運用模糊化的屬性特性,解決傳統降雨資料分析之限制,以期更完整地描述各子流域區塊之實際降雨特性,進而提高流量及非點源污染量推估之準確性。具有空間變異性之分析結果,即可應用在集水區分區管制優先順序之決策上,以及發展非點源污染最佳管制作業之經濟有效配置。
由結果可知,模糊化修正式反距離指數法,透過調整模糊化隸屬函數來表現周圍雨量站相對之權重,確實可以提高降雨推估的彈性及準確度;特別是在地形較為崎嶇的案例區,此方法具有其相對之優勢。值得注意的是,在模糊化修正式反距離法優化最佳水平距離指數”m”,及優化最佳垂直高程差距離指數”n”,在多數情況下,m值均大於n值;此結果說明,周圍各雨量站相對重要性遞減之速率,受到水平間距因子的影響甚於垂直高程差因子。在流量及非點源污染模擬應用的部分,降雨在空間的變異性與高程為正向關係或降雨地區化集中之暴雨,採用模糊化修正式反距離指數法,均能有效地降低降雨推估誤差,及提高流量及非點源污染模擬結果之準確性,尤其是與高程具有絕對相關之設計暴雨,此方法之改善更為明顯。而隨機空間變異之降雨,採用模糊化修正式反距離指數法,對於降雨推估及流量模擬之準確性,提升效果較不明顯。在自然環境下,降雨通常會與空間高程具有密切的正相關,因某些因素造成地區性集中之暴雨亦較為常見,隨機空間變異之暴雨較不合理,因此,可以證實,模糊化修正式反距離指數法在降雨具有空間變異的情況下,具有極佳之彈性,且推估結果可信度相當高。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | A watershed management program is usually based on the results of watershed modeling. Accurate modeling results are decided by the appropriate parameters and input data. Rainfall is the most important input for watershed modeling. Precipitation characteristics, such as rainfall intensity and duration, usually exhibit significant spatial variation, even within small watersheds. Therefore, properly describing the spatial variation of rainfall is essential for predicting the water movement in a watershed. Varied circumstances require a variety of suitable methods for interpolating and estimating precipitation. In this study, a modified method, combining the inverse distance method and fuzzy theory, was applied to precipitation interpolation. Meanwhile, genetic algorithm (GA) was used to determine the parameters of fuzzy membership functions, which represent the relationship between the location without rainfall records and its surrounding rainfall gauges. The objective in the optimization process was to minimize the estimated error of precipitation.
The results show that the estimated error is usually reduced by this method. Particularly, when there are large and irregular elevation differences between the interpolated area and its vicinal rainfall gauging stations, it is important to consider the effect of elevation differences, in addition to the effect of horizontal distances. Reliable modeling results can substantially lower the cost for the watershed management strategy. The modeling results with spatial differences characteristics can also be used for deciding the sequence of precedence management in a watershed, and developing the optimal allocation of Best management practices (BMPs). | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T06:36:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-94-F89541201-1.pdf: 3393779 bytes, checksum: f42c8bb1297dd566460312239ed23c80 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 前言………………………………………………………….1-1
1-1 研究緣起…………………………………………………………1-1 1-2 研究目的…………………………………………………………1-2 第二章 文獻回顧……………………………………………………2-1 2-1 集水區非點源污染……………………………………...……2-1 2-1-1 非點源污染現況…………………………………………..…2-1 2-1-2 非點源污染量之推估……………………………………..…2-2 2-2 降雨空間變異性分析………………………………………….2-14 2-2-1 降雨空間變異影響非點源污染量之相關研究……………2-14 2-2-2 降雨空間變異之分析方法…………………………………2-15 2-3 模糊理論……………………………………………………….2-17 2-4 基因演算法…………………………………………………….2-25 2-5 合成數據……………………………………………………...2-29 第三章 研究方法…………………………………………………3-1 3-1 研究流程及架構………………………………………………3-1 3-2 案例分析方法…………………………………………………3-3 3-2-1 實際案例分析…………………………….…...…………3-3 3-2-2 虛擬案例分析………………………………………………3-5 3-3 降雨空間變異性分析方法之建構……………………………3-6 3-4 非點源污染模式之應用………………………………………3-18 3-4-1 流量模擬……………………………….….………………3-19 3-4-2 水質模擬……………………………….….………………3-22 3-4-3 最佳管制作業分析…………………………….……….…3-25 3-5 最佳管制作業之經濟配置問題………………………………3-28 第四章 降雨特性對集水區水量及水質模擬之影響………………4-1 4-1 WinVAST模式參數之敏感度分析………………………………4-1 4-2 降雨空間變異性對於流量及非點源污染模擬之影響…………4-6 4-3 降雨空間變異性對於最佳管制作業配置之影響………….…4-17 第五章 降雨空間變異性分析方法………………………………5-1 5-1 變階反距離指數法之優化分析………………………………5-1 5-2 探討影響變階反距離法之因子………………………………5-8 5-2-1 降雨資料對於推估誤差的影響…………………….……5-10 5-2-2 雨量站分佈對於推估誤差的影響…………………………5-16 5-2-3 最佳距離指數之影響因子分析……………………………5-18 5-3 模糊化修正式反距離指數法……………….………………5-23 5-3-1 模糊化修正式反距離指數法在降雨補遺之改善.………5-23 5-3-2 隸屬函數參數分析…………………………………….…5-27 第六章 流量及非點源污染模擬……………………...……..……6-1 6-1 流量模擬結果分析.….…………………………..……….…6-1 6-2 非點源污染模擬結果分析………………………………….…6-8 6-3 最佳管制作業經濟配置之結果分析……………………...…6-17 第七章 結論與建議………………………………………………..7-1 7-1 結論…………………………………………………………….7-1 7-2 建議…………………………………………………………….7-5 參考文獻……………………………………….….…………….…R-1 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 以模糊理論分析降雨空間變異性推估流量及非點源污染量 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Applying fuzzy theory to analyze spatial rainfall variability for estimating runoff and non-point source pollution | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 94-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李公哲,馬鴻文,郭振泰,高正忠,游保杉 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 降雨,空間變異,模糊理論,非點源污染, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | fuzzy theory,non-point source pollution (NPSP),rainfall,spatial variability, | en |
dc.relation.page | 172 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2005-11-07 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 環境工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 環境工程學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-94-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.31 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。