請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/34574
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 鄭伯壎 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yi-Chen Lee | en |
dc.contributor.author | 李宜蓁 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T06:16:01Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2007-02-08 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2006-02-08 | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2006-02-02 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分
吳子輝(1973)。「內外控取向與自由選擇對閱讀成績的影響」(未發表之碩士論文)。國立政治大學教育研究所。 李瑞玲(1993)。「以生物-心理-社會模式探討生氣歷程對血壓心理生理機制之影響」(未發表之博士論文)。國立臺灣大學心理學研究所。 李佳燕(2001)。「直屬主管情緒表現與部屬工作態度:部屬情感與情緒感染性的不同效果」(未發表之碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學心理學研究所。 邱皓政(2002)。「量化研究與統計分析:SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析」。臺北:五南。 邱皓政(2003)。「結構方程模式LISREL的理論、技術與應用」。臺北:雙葉書廊。 吳宗佑、徐瑋伶、鄭伯壎(2002)。怒不可遏或忍氣吞聲:華人企業主管威權領導與部屬憤怒反應。「本土心理學研究」,18,3-49。 吳宗佑(2003a)。「工作中的情緒勞動:概念發展、相關變項分析、心理歷程議題探討」(未發表之博士論文)。國立臺灣大學心理研究所。 吳宗佑(2003b)。見鄭伯壎、姜定宇、鄭弘岳(主編):「組織行為研究在臺灣:三十年回顧與展望」,第五章。臺北:桂冠。 金耀基(1988)。「面」、「恥」與中國人行為之分析。見楊國樞(主編):「中國人的心理」,頁319-345。臺北:桂冠。 洪福建(1992)。「大學生與異性交往中的自我差距與情緒經驗」(未發表之碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學心理學研究所。 徐枝葦(2002)。「人際壓力源對組織承諾之影響:二元中介機制模式之探討」。(未發表之碩士論文)國立臺灣大學心理學研究所。 許靜怡(1995)。「自尊、內外控、控制歷程與生氣表達之關係」(未發表之碩士論文)。政治大學心理學研究所。 高夫曼(Goleman, D., 1998/1998)。「工作EQ」(李瑞玲譯)。台北:時報文化。 郭建志、曹常成(2004)。內外控信念、主管支持與不安全行為:台灣營造業之研究。「中華心理學刋」,46,293-305。 馮觀富(2005)。「情緒心理學」。臺北:心理。 黃光國(1988)。人情與面子:中國人的權力遊戲。見楊國樞(主編):「中國人的心理」,頁289-318。臺北:桂冠。 黃光國(2005)。華人社會中的臉面觀。見楊國樞、黃光國、楊中芳(主編):「華人本土心理學」,頁365-405。臺北:遠流。 黃麗倩(1999)。「生氣表現的影響因素」(未發表之碩士論文)。中原大學心理學研究所。 雷庚玲(1997)。「雙親對子女的言語傷害:父母說負向言語之分類架構及本土盛行率」。國科會專題研究計畫成果報告。 楊宜憓(1999)。「臺灣大學生的情緒經驗與社會關係」(未發表之碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學心理學研究所。 楊國樞、葉明華(2005)。家族主義與泛家族主義。見楊國樞、黃光國、楊中芳(主編):「華人本土心理學」,頁249-292。臺北:遠流。 楊國樞(2005)。華人社會取向的理論分析。見楊國樞、黃光國、楊中芳(主編):「華人本土心理學」,頁173-213。臺北:遠流。 鄭伯壎(1993)。「家長權威與領導行為關係之探討」。國科會專題研究計畫成果報告。 鄭伯壎(1995)。「不同家長威權價值與領導作風的關係」。國科會專題研究計畫成果報告。 鄭伯壎、周麗芳、樊景立(2000)。家長式領導量表:三元模式的建構與測量。「本土心理學研究期刊」,14,3-64。 樊景立、鄭伯壎(2000)。華人組織的家長式領導:一項文化觀點的分析。「本土心理學研究」,13,127-227。 鄭伯壎(2004)。華人文化與組織領導:由現象描述到理論驗證。「本土心理學研究」,22,195-251。 鄭伯壎(2005)。「華人領導-理論與實際」。臺北:桂冠。 蕭仁釗(2000)。「負向生活事件回應歷程中性格與族群因素之影響」(未發表之博士論文)。國立臺灣大學心理學研究所。 英文部分 Anderson, C. J. (2003). The psychology of doing nothing: Forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 139. Ashforth, B. E., & Humphrey, R. H. (1995). Emotion in the workplace: A reappraisal. Human Relations, 48, 97-125. Ashforth, B. E. (1997). Petty tyranny in organization: A preliminary examination of antecedents and consequences. Canadian Jouranal of Administrative Sciences, 14, 126-140. Ashkanasy, N. M., & Daus, C. S. (2002). Emotion in the workplace: The new challenge for managers. Academy of Management Excecutive, 16, 76-86. Ashkanasy, N. M., Härtel, C. E., & Daus, C. S. (2002). Diversity and emotion: The new frontiers in organizational behavior research. Journal of Management, 28, 307-338. Ashkanasy, N. M. (2002). Studies of cognition and emotion in organizations: Attribution, affective events, emotional intelligence and perception of emotion. Australian Journal of Management, 27, 11-20. Bagozzi, R. P., Verbeke, W., & Gavino, J. C. Jr. (2003). Culture moderates the self-regulation of shame and its effects on performance: The case of salespersons in the Netherlands and the Philippines. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 219-233. Baron, R. A. (1993). Affect and Organizational Behavior: When and Why Feeling Good (or Bad) Matter. In Murnighan, J. K.(Ed.), Social Psychology in Organization(pp. 63-88). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons. Baron, R. A., & Neuman, J. H. (1998). Workplace aggrassion - The iceberg beneath the tip of workplace violence: Evidence on its forms, frequency, and targets. Public Administrtion Quarterly, 21, 446-464. Barron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Pshycology, 51, 1173-1182. Bedford, O., & Huang, K. K. (2003). Guilt and shame in Chinese culture: A cross-cultural framwork from the perspective of morality and identity. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 33, 127-144. Berkowitz, L. (1989). Frustration-Aggression Hypothesis: Examination and Reformulation. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 59-73. Berkowitz, L. (1990). On the formation and regulation of anger and aggression: A cognitive-neoassociationistic analysis. American Psychologist, 45, 494-503. Böddeker, I., & Stemmler, G. (2000). Who responds how and when to anger? The assessment of actual anger response styles and their relation to personality. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 737-762. Butterfield, K.D., Trevino, L. K., & Ball, G. A. (1996). Punishment from manager’s perspective: A grounded investigation and inductive model. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1479-1510. Burkitt, I. (1997). Social relationships and emotions. Sociology: the Journal of the British Sociological Association, 31, 37-45. Chao, R. K. (1994). Beyond parental control and authoritarian parenting style: Understanding Chinese parenting through the cultural nortion of training. Child Deelopment, 65, 1111-1119. Clark, M. S. (1992). Emotion. New Delhi, London : Newbury Park. Cortina, L. M., Magley, V. J., Williams, J. H., & Langhout, R.D. (2001). Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 64-80. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 668-678. Dasborough, M. T., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2002). Emotion and attribution of intentionality in leader-menber relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 615-634. Dickerson, S. S., Gruenewald, T. L., & Kemeny, M. E. (2004). When the socila self is threatened: Shame, psysiology, and health. Jouranl of Personality, 72, 1191-1216. Einarsen, S. (1999). The nature and causes of bullying at work. International Journal of Manpower, 20, 16-31. Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 6, 169-200. Farh, J. L., Dobbins, G. H., & Cheng, B. S. (1991). Culture relativity in action: A comparison of self-ratings made by Chinese and U.S. workers. Personnel Psychology, 44, 129-147. Fisher, C. D., & Ashkansay, N. M. (2000). The emerging role of emotions in work life: an introduction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 123-129. Fitness, J. (2000). Anger in the workplace: An emotional script approach to anger episodes between workers and their superiors, co-workers and subordinates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 147-162. Folkman, S. (1984). Personal control and stress and coping processes: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 839-852. Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 150-170. George J. M., & Jones, G.. R. (1997). Experiencing work: Values, attitude, and moods. Human Relations,50, 393-415. George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good-doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizatinal spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 310-329. Gilbet, P., & Miles, J. N. V. (2000). Sensitivity to social put-down: It’s relationship to perceptions of social rank, shame, social anxiety, depression, anger and self-other blame. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 757-774. Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Managemnet Review, 17, 183-211. Gross, J. J. (1999). Emotion regualtion: Past, present, future. Cognition and Emotion, 13, 551-573. Knuth, R. (2004). The negative uses of power. Principle Leadership, 5, 44-49. Larsen, R. J., & Ketelaar, T. (1989). Extraversion, neuroticism and susceptibility to positive and negative mood induction procedures. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 1221-1228. Larsen, R. J., & Ketelaar, T. (1991). Personality and Susceptibility to positive and negative emotion states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 132-140. Lazarus, R. S. (1993). From psychological stress to the emotions: A history of changing outlooks. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 1-21. Leck, J. D. (2003). Violence in the Canadian workplace. Journal of American Academy of Business, 7, 308-315. Leith, K. P., & Baumeister, R. F. (1996). Why do bad moods increase self-defeating behavior? Emotion, risk taking, and self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1250-1267. Lerner, J. S., & Keltner D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 146-159. Lewis, K. M. (2000). When leader display emotion: gow followers respond to negative emotional expression of male and female leader. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 221-234. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion,and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253. Mobley, W. H. (1977). Intermediate loinkages ub the relationship betewwn job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 237-240. Negy, S. M. (2002). Using a single-item approach to measure facet job satisfaction. Jouranl of Occupational and Organizational Psycholoby, 75, 77-86. Neuman, J. H., & Baron, R. A. (1998). Workplace violence and workplace aggression: Evidence concerning specific forms, potential causes, and preferred targets. Journal of Management, 24, 391-419. Parkes, K. R. (1990). Coping, Negativity, and the work environment: Additive and interactive predictors of mental health. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 399-409. Parkinson, B., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1992). Appraisal as a cause of emotion, In Clark M. S. (Ed.), Emotion( pp. 122-149). New Delhi, London : Newbury Park. Perrewe, P. L., & Zellars, K. L. (1999). An examination of attributions and emotions in the transactional approach to the organizational stress process. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 739-752. Phillip, R. S., Wu, S., & Judith, C. S.(1992). Cross-Cultural Similarities and Differences in Emotion and Its Representation.In Clark, M. S. (Ed), Emotion (pp. 175-212). New Delhi, London: Newbury Park. Pirola-Merlo, A., Härtel, C., Mann, L., & Hirst, G.. (2002). How leaders influence the impact of affective events on team climate and performance in R&D teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 561-581. Powell, G. N. (1998). The abusive organiztion. Academy of Management Executive, 12, 95-96. Rafaeli, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1989). The Expression of Emotion in Organizational Life. Research in Organizational Behavior, 11, 1-42. Retzinger, S. M. (1995). Identifyung shame and anger in discourse. American Behavioral Scientist, 38, 1104-1113. Roseman, I. J., Spindel, M. S., & Jose, P. E. (1990). Appraisals of emotion-eliciting events: Testing a theory of discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 59, 899-915. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus ezternal control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80, 609. Rusting, C. L., & Larsen, R. J. (1997). Extraversion, neuroticism and susceptibility to positive and negative affect: A test of two theoretical models. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 607-612. Scarpello, V., & Campbell, J. P. (1983). Job satisfaction: Are all the parts there? Personnel Psychology, 36, 577-600. Seo, M. G., Barrett, L. F., & Bartunek, J. M. (2004). The role of affective experience in work motivation. Academy of Management Review, 29, 423-439. Smith, C. A., & Ellsorth C. (1987). Patterns of appraisal and emotion related to taking an exam. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 475-488. Smith, C. A., Haynes, K. N., Lazarus, R. S., & Pope, L. K. (1993). In search of the 'hot' cognitions: Attributions, appraisals, and their relation to emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 916. Spector, P. E. (1982). Behabior in Organizations as a function of employee’s locus of control. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 482-497. Spector, P. E., & O’Connell, B. J. (1994). The contribution of personality trait, negative affectivity, locus of control and Type A to the subsequent reports of job stressors and job strains. Jouranl of Occupational and Orgnizational Psychology, 67, 1-11. Stöber, J. (2003). Self-Pity: Exploring the links to Personality, Control Beliefs, and Anger. Journal of Personality, 71, 183-220. Sutton, R.I., & Rafaeli, A. (1988). Untangling the relationship between displayed emotion and organizational sales: The case of convenience stores. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 461-487. Tangney, J. P, Wagner, P., Fletcher, C., & Gramzow, R. (1992). Shame in to anger? The relation of shame and guilt to anger and self-reported aggression. Journal of Personaloty and Social Psychology, 62, 669-675. Tangney, J. P., Wagner, P. E., Hill-Barlow, D., Marschall, D. E., & Gramzow, R. (1996). Relation of shame and guilt to constructive versus destructive responses to anger across the lifespan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 797-809. Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178-190. Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., & Shaw, J. D. (2001). Personality moderators of the relationship between abusive supervision and subordinates' resistance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 974-983. Tobin, R. M., Graziano W. G., Vanman E. J., & Tassinary L. G.. (2000). Personality, emotional experience, and efforts to control emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 656. Valle,M. (2005). A preliminary model of abusive behavior in organization. Southern Business Review, 30, 27-35. Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Hudy, M. J. (1997). Overall job satisfication: How good are sigle-item measure? Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 247-252. Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1984). Negative affectivity: The dispositon to experience aversive emotional states. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 465-490. Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Tower a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 218-235. Weiss, H.M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective Event Theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 1-74. Weiss, H. M., Nicholas, J. P., & Daus, C. S. (1999). An examonation of the joint effects of affective experience and job beliefs on job satisfaction and variations in affective experience over time. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78, 1-24. Yukl, G.. (2002). Leadership in organization. New Jersey:Prentice Hall. Zellars, K. L., Tepper, B. J., & Duffy, M. K. (2002). Abusive supervision and subordinates' organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 1068-1076. Zohar, D., Tzischinski, O., & Epstein R. (2003). Effect of energy availability on immediate and delayed emotion reactions to work events. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 1082-1093. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/34574 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 西方領導研究在這幾年開始注意組織中的黑暗面(dark side),關心工作場域中對部屬的不適當對待,華人組織中最具特色的威權領導和來自西方概念的苛責行為(稱之貶抑行為)就是屬於上述一類的領導行為,對部屬效能之影響甚巨,本研究想探討其影響效果。此研究進一步將威權領導區分為強調專權作風之專權行為,及強調對任務、程序控制之教誨行為,再與貶抑行為的效果相互對照,根據情感事件理論(Affective Events Theory),認為負向情感(憤怒、害怕、羞愧)在領導行為和部屬效能間扮演重要的中介角色,而領導行為對部屬情感的影響又深受個人特質的影響,於是本研究進一步探討部屬內外控的調節效果。本研究以問卷作為資料收集的工具,對20家組織成員進行施測,一共發出290份問卷。研究結果發現此三類領導行為(貶抑行為、專權行為與教誨行為)的確具有不同的意涵,對部屬情感和部屬效能有不同程度的影響,同時驗證西方貶抑行為的外衍效度;在情感的中介效果方面,發現憤怒情感是主要的中介情感,該研究對情感的關注,補足威權領導研究中較缺乏探討的情感議題;最後,部屬的內外控在教誨行為與部屬情感間具有調節效果。本研究最末亦進一步探討本研究在理論上的貢獻與限制,以及所得結果在管理實務上的應用。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Recently researchers started to notice the “dark side” of organizational life and concern about the mistreatments from supervisors in workplace. Authoritarian leadership(in Chinese organizations)and a Western concept, abusive leadership, both belong to the idea mentioned above and have dramatic impacts on work efficiency of subordinates. This study further divided Authoritarian leadership into two parts: autocratic style and didactic behavior; Abusive Leadership is similar to a Chinese concept, debasing behavior. According to Affect Event Theory(AET), we thought that subordinates’ negative affectivities (such as anger, fear, and shame) play a key role between leadership and subordinates’ outcomes(perceptual upper-evaluation, self-evaluation, satisfaction with supervisor, and turnover). Furthermore, the belief of locus of control would affect our affective reaction to leader’s behaviors. By the survey data from 290 employees in 20 private enterprises, we found that the three leadership styles(autocratic style, didactic behavior, and debasing behavior)have different content of effects on subordinates’ affective reactions and outcomes, and debasing behavior has even larger influence. Anger is the main mediating source. External control has its moderating effect between didactic behavior and subordinates’ negative affectivities. Lastly, we discussed the limits and contributions of the study, and practical implications from the study. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T06:16:01Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-95-R92227028-1.pdf: 813509 bytes, checksum: dd889f5ad71b4e2818500b04a48ba4d7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論..............................................1
第二章 文獻探討..........................................5 第一節 領導行為的黑暗面............................. 5 第二節 情感..............................................11 第三節 領導行為與部屬負向情感........................20 第四節 部屬負向情感與其效能..........................24 第五節 部屬負向情感的中介角色........................26 第六節 內外控的調節效果..............................27 第三章 研究方法..........................................30 第一節 研究樣本......................................30 第二節 研究工具......................................32 第三節 研究程序......................................42 第四節 資料分析......................................43 第四章 研究結果..........................................47 第一節 各變項之相關..................................47 第二節 主管領導行為、部屬情感、部屬效能的區段迴歸分析51 第三節 內外控的調節效果分析..........................60 第四節 「領導行為-部屬情感-部屬效能」之結構方程模型分 析..........................................63 第五章 討論與建議.......................................64 第一節 結果討論.....................................64 第二節 研究限制.....................................67 第三節 未來研究方向.................................68 第四節 管理實務意涵.................................69 參考文獻................................................71 附錄一 研究問卷.........................................79 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 不同威權領導的負面效果:檢視部屬負面情感的中介角色 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Negative effects of different authoritarian leadership styles:The mediating role of subordinates' negative affectivities | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 94-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳淑惠,蔡維奇,郭建志,吳宗祐 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 威權領導,專權行為,教誨行為,貶抑行為,部屬負向情感,憤怒,害怕,羞愧,內外控, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | authoritarian leadership,autocratic style,didactic behavior,debasing behavior,subordinate negative affectivity,anger,fear,shame,locus of control, | en |
dc.relation.page | 87 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2006-02-03 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 心理學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-95-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 794.44 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。