請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/34448
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳正興(Cheng-Hsing Chen) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yung-Yen Ko | en |
dc.contributor.author | 柯永彥 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T06:09:06Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2008-06-05 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2006-06-05 | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2006-05-19 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Ahlvin, R. G., Ulery, H. H. (1962) Tabulated values for determining the complete pattern of stresses, strains, and deflections beneath a uniform load on a homogeneous half space. Highway Research Board, Bulletin 342, pp. 1-13.
2. Andrä, H., Schnack, E. (1997) Integration of singular integrals for the Galerkin-type boundary element method in 3D elasticity. Numerische Mathematik 76(2), pp. 143-165 3. Andrä, H. (1998) Integration of singular integrals for the Galerkin-type boundary element method in 3D elasticity. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 157, pp. 239-249. 4. Balakrishna, C., Gray, L. J., Kane, J. H. (1994) Efficient analytical integration of symmetric Galerkin boundary integrals over curved elements: elasticity formulation, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 117, pp. 157-179. 5. Belyschko, T., Lu, Y. Y. (1991) Singular integration in variationally coupled FE-BE method. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 117(4), pp. 820-835. 6. Belyschko, T., Lu, Y. Y. (1994) A variationally coupled FE-BE method for transient problem. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 37(1), pp. 91-104. 7. Bickford, W. B. A First Course in The Finite Element Method, Irwin, Burr Ridge, 1994. 8. Blázquez, A., Mantič, V., París F., Cañas, J. (1996) On the removal of rigid body motions in the solution of elastostatic problems by direct BEM. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 39, pp. 4021-4038. 9. Bonnet, M. Boundary Integral Equation Methods for Solids and Fluids, Wiley, New York, 1995. 10. Bonnet, M. (1995) Regularized direct and indirect symmetric variational BIE formulations for three-dimensional elasticity. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 15(1), pp. 93-102. 11. Bonnet, M., Guiggiani, M. (2003) Direct evaluation of double singular integrals and new free terms in 2D (symmetric) Galerkin BEM. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 192, pp. 2565-2596. 12. Bonnet, M., Maier, G., Polizzotto, C. (1998) Symmetric Galerkin boundary element method. Applied Mechanics Reviews 51, pp. 669-704. 13. Chen, G., Zhou, J. Boundary Element Methods, Academic Press, London, 1992. 14. Chen, J. T., Chen, W. C., Chen, K. H., Chen, I. L. (2003) Revisit of the free terms of the dual boundary integral equations for elasticity. Kuwait Journal of Science and Engineering 30(2), pp. 1-22. 15. Chen, J. T., Chen, W. C., Lin, S. R., Chen, I. L. (2003) Rigid body mode and spurious mode in the dual boundary element formulation for the Laplace problems. Computers and Structures 81(13), pp. 1395-1404. 16. Chen, J. T., Hong, H. K. Chyuan, S. W. (1994) Boundary element analysis and design in seepage flow problems with sheetpiles. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 17, pp. 1-20. 17. Chen, J. T., Kuo, S. R., Lin, J. H. (2002) Analytical study and numerical experiments for degenerate scale problems in the boundary element method for two-dimensional elasticity. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 54(12), pp. 1669-1681. 18. Chen, J. T., Lin, J. H., Kuo, S. R., Chiu, Y. P. (2001) Analytical study and numerical experiments for degenerate scale problems in boundary element method using degenerate kernels and circulants. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 25(9), pp. 819-828. 19. Chen, J. T., Lin, S. R. (2002) On the rank-deficiency problems in boundary integral formulation using Fredholm alternative theorem and singular value decomposition technique. Fifth World Congress on Computational Mechanics, July 7-12, 2002, Vienna, Austria. 20. Chen, J. T., Lin, S. R., Chen, K. H. (2005) Degenerate scale problem when solving Laplace’s equation by BEM and its treatment. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 62(2), pp. 233-261. 21. Cheng A. H.-D., Cheng, D. T. (2005) Heritage and early history of the boundary element method. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 29, pp. 268-302. 22. Constanda, C. (1997) On the Dirichlet problem for the two-dimensional biharmonic equation, Mathematical Methods in the Applied Science, 20(10), pp. 885-890. 23. DeFigueiredo, T. G. B., Brebbia, C.A. (1989) A new hybrid displacement variational formulation of BEM for elastostatics. In: Brebbia, C. A., Connor, J. J. (eds) Advances in boundary elements, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 47-58. 24. Dostal, Z., Malik, J. (1995) Symmetric FE-BE coupling with iteration on the interface. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 38(1), pp. 27-35. 25. Duffy, MG (1982) Quadrature over a pyramid or cube of integrals with a singularity at a vertex. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 19, pp. 1260-1262. 26. Erichsen, S., Sauter S. A. (1998) Efficient automatic quadrature in 3-D Galerkin BEM, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 157, pp. 215-224. 27. Frangi, A. (1998) Regularization of boundary element formulations by the derivative transfer method. In: Sladek, V., Sladek, J. (eds.) Singular Integrals In Boundary Element Methods, Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, pp. 125-164. 28. Frangi, A., Maier, G., Novati, G., Springhetti, R. (2003) Symmetric Galerkin boundary element analysis in three-dimensional linear-elastic fracture mechanics. In: Hall, W. S., Oliveto, G. (eds) Boundary Element Methods For Soil-Structure Interaction, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 315-344. 29. Frangi, A., Novati, G., Springhetti, R., Rovizzi, M. (2002) 3D fracture analysis by the symmetric Galerkin BEM. Computational Mechanics 28: 220-232. 30. Frangi, A., Guiggiani, M. (2000) A direct approach for boundary integral equations with high-order singularities. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 49, pp. 871-898. 31. Freddi, F., Royer-Carfagni, G. (2006) Symmetric Galerkin BEM for bodies with unconstrained contours. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 195, pp. 961-981. 32. Ganguly, S., Layton, J. B., Balakrishna, C. (2000) Symmetric coupling of multizone curved Galerkin boundary elements with finite elements in elasticity. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering. 48, pp. 633-654. 33. Gao, X. W., Davies, T. G. Boundary element programming in mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002. 34. Gaul, L., Kögl, M., Wagner, M. Boundary element methods for engineers and scientists- An introductory course with advanced topics. Springer, Berlin, 2003. 35. Gray, L. J. (1998) Evaluation of singular and hypersingular Galerkin integrals: direct limits and symbolic computation. In: Sladek, V., Sladek, J. (eds.) Singular Integrals In Boundary Element Methods, Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, pp. 45-84. 36. Gray, L. J,. Glaeser, J. M., Kaplan, T. (2004) Direct evaluation of hypersingular Galerkin surface integrals. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 25(5), pp. 1534-1556. 37. Gray, L. J., Kaplan, T. (2001) 3D Galerkin integration without Stokes’ theorem. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements. 25, pp. 289-295. 38. Guiggiani, M., Gigante, A. (1990) A general algorithm for multidimensional Cauchy principal value integrals in the boundary element method. Journal of Applied Mechanics 57, pp. 906-915. 39. Guiggiani, M., Krishnasamy, G., Rudolphi, T. J., Rizzo, F. J. (1992) A general algorithm for the numerical solution of hypersingular boundary integral equations. Journal of Applied Mechanics 59, pp. 604-614. 40. Haas, M., Kuhn, G. (1999) Implementation of an advanced symmetric Galerkin BEM-formulation for 3D-elastostatics. In: Brebbia, C. A., Power, H. (eds) Advances in Boundary Elements, Vol. 6: Proceedings of the twenty-first world conference on the Boundary Element Method BEM 21, WITPress, Southampton, pp. 687-696. 41. Haas, M., Kuhn, G. (2002), A symmetric Galerkin BEM implementation for 3D elastostatic problems with an extension to curved elements. Computational Mechanics 28, pp. 250-259. 42. Haas, M., Kuhn, G. (2003) Mixed-dimensional, symmetric coupling of FEM and BEM. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 27, pp. 575-582 43. Hackbush, W., Sauter, S. A. (1993) On the efficient use of the Galerkin method to solve Fredholm integral equation. Applications of Mathematics 38, pp. 301-322. 44. Hartmann, F. (1980) Computing the C-matrix in non-smooth boundary points. In: Brebbia, C. A. (ed) New Developments in Boundary Element Methods, CML Publications, Southampton, pp. 367-379. 45. He, W. J., Ding, H. J., Hu, H. C. (1996) A necessary and sufficient boundary integral formulation for plane elasticity problems. Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering 12, pp. 413-424. 46. Hong, H. K., Chen, J. T. (1988) Derivations of integral equations of elasticity. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 114(6), pp. 1028-1044. 47. Hsiao, G. C. (1990) The coupling of boundary and finite element methods. Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik 70(6), pp. T493-T503. 48. Kane, J. H., Boundary element analysis in engineering continuum mechanics. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1994. 49. Karamanlidis, D. (1988) On a modified Hellinger-Reissnerr variatiobnal theorem for the analysis of elastoplastic solids. Journal of Applied Mechanics 55, pp. 536-538. 50. Kohno, K., Tsunada, T., Seto, H., Tanaka, M. (1991) Hybrid stress analysis of boundary and finite elements by a super-element method. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 7(4), pp. 279-290. 51. Lamp, U., Schleicher, T., Stephan, E., Wendland, W. (1982) Theoretical and experimental asymptotic convergence of the boundary integral method for a plane mixed boundary value problem. In: Brebbia, C.A. (ed) Boundary Element Methods in Engineering, Springer-Verlag, Berlin , pp. 3-17. 52. Leon, A. (1908) Ü ber die Störungen der Spannungsverteilung, die in elastischen Körpern durch Bohrungen und Bläschen entstehen, Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik. 53. Leung, K. L., Zavareh, P. B., Beskos, D. E. (1995) 2-D elasostatic analysis by a symmetric BEM/FEM scheme. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 15(1), pp. 67-78. 54. Li, H. B., Han, G. M., Mang, H. A., Torizicki, P. (1986) A new method for the coupling of FE and BE discretized subdomains of elastic bodies. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 54, pp. 161-185. 55. Lutz, E., Ye, W. J., Mukherjee, S. (1998) Elimination of rigid modes from discretized boundary integral equations. International Journal of Solids and Structures. 35(33), pp. 4427-4436. 56. Mang, H. A., Torzicky, P., Chen, Z. Y. (1989) On the mechanical inconsistency of symmetrization of unsymmetric coupling matrices for BE/FEM discretizations of solids. Computational Mechanics 4, pp. 301-308. 57. Mattes, N. S., Poulos, H. G. (1969) Settlement of a single compressive pile. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division (ASCE), 95(1), pp. 189-207 58. Mi, Y., Aliabadi, M. H. (1992) Dual boundary element method for three- dimensional fracture mechanics analysis. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 10, pp. 161-171. 59. Muki, R. (1960) Asymmetric problems of the theory of elasticity for a semi-infinite solid and a thick plate. In: Sneddon, I, N., Hill, R. (eds) Progress in Solid Mechanics, Vol. 1, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 401-439. 60. Novati, G., Frangi, A (2002) Symmetric Galerkin BEM in 3D elasticity: computational aspects and applications to fracture mechanics. In: Kompiš, V. (ed) Selected Topics in Boundary Integral Formulations for Solids and Fluids, Springer-Wein, New York, pp. 181-207. 61. Pan. L., Rizzo, F., Martin, P. A. (1998) Some efficient boundary integral strategies for time-harmonic wave problems in an elastic halfspace. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 164, pp. 207-221. 62. Pérez-Gavilán, J. J., Aliabadi, M. H. (2001) Symmetric Galerkin BEM for multi-connected bodies. Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering 17, pp. 761-770. 63. Pérez-Gavilán, J. J., Aliabadi, M. H. (2001) A symmetric Galerkin BEM for multi-connected bodies: a new approach. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 25, pp. 633-638. 64. Poulos, H. G., Davis, E. H. Pile Foundation Analysis and Design, Wiley, New York, 1980. 65. Reinoso, E., Wrobel, L.C., Power, H. (1997) Three-dimensional scattering of seismic waves from topographical structures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 16, pp. 41-61. 66. Rizzo, F. J. (1967) An integral equation approach to boundary value problems of classical elastostatics. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics. 25, pp. 83-95. 67. Sauter, S. A., Schwab, C. (1997) Quadrature for hp-Galerkin BEM in R3. Numerische Mathematik 78, pp. 211-258. 68. Sirtori, S., Maier, G., Novati, G., Miccoli, S. (1992) A Galerkin symmetric boundary-element method in elasticity: formulation and implementation. International Journal For Numerical Methods In Engineering 35, pp. 255-282. 69. Stamos, A. A., Beskos, D.E. (1996) 3D seismic response analysis of long lined tunnels in half-space, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 15, pp. 111-118. 70. Timoshenko, S. P., Goodier, J. N. Theory of Elasticity 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1970. 71. Univ. of Tennessee, Univ. of California Berkeley, NAG Ltd., Courant Institute, Argonne National Lab, and Rice University, LAPACK routine (version 3.0), December 1, 1999. 72. Verchery, G. (1990) Régularisation du système de l’équilibre des structures élastiques discrètes. Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences Série II 311, pp. 585-589. 73. Vodička, R., Mantič, V. (2004) On invertibility of boundary integral equation systems in linear elasticity. Building Research Journal 52(1), pp. 1-17 74. Vodička, R., Mantič, V., París F. (2006) On the removal of the non-uniqueness in the solution of elastostatic problems by symmetric Galerkin BEM. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, in press, published online in Wiley InterScience. 75. Vodička, R., Mantič, V., París F. (2006) Notes on the removal of rigid body motions in the solution of elastostatic problems by SGBEM. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, in press. 76. Wendland, W. L. (1981) On the asymptotic convergence of some boundary element methods. In: Whiteman, J. R. (ed) The Mathematics of Finite Element and Applications IV, MAFELAP 1981, Academic Press London, New York, pp. 281-312. 77. Yildir, Y. B. (1988) Computer-aided magnetic field analysis using the boundary element method. Proceedings of The Icwa-International Coil Winding Association, Cincinnati, Ohio, October 3-6, 1988. 78. Zeng, X. G., Bielak, J. (1995) Stable symmetric finite element-boundary integral coupling methods for fulid-structure interface problems. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 15(1), pp. 79-91. 79. Zienkiewicz, O. C., Kelly, D. W., Bettess, P. (1977) The coupling of the FEM and boundary solution procedures. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 11, pp. 355-375. 80. 黃燦輝,邊界積分法在三維隧道分析之研究,國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所博士論文,1983。 81. 王彝彬,譚建國 (1985) 半平面混合型邊界值問題之邊界元素解法,第八屆電子計算機在結構工程上之應用研討會。 82. 林郁清,壓力波在山谷之散射研究,國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所碩士論文,1986。 83. 俞肇球,壓力波在山峰之散射研究,國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所碩士論文,1986。 84. 陳正宗,破裂力學之邊界積分推導與阿達馬主值之研究,國立臺灣大學應用力學研究所碩士論文,1986。 85. 蕭喻鴻,能量與特徵邊界積分方程式之新理論發展與應用,國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所碩士論文,1990。 86. 李洋傑,層狀土壤與結構物之互制作用分析,國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所博士論文,1992。 87. 陳正宗,洪宏基,邊界元素法(第二版),新世界,台北,1992。 88. 陳正宗,對偶表示模式及其在計算力學之應用,國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所博士論文,1994。 89. 丘宜平,對稱與非對稱邊界元素法理論探討與研究,國立台灣海洋大學河海工程學研究所碩士論文,1999。 90. 林盛益,朱雅雯,陳正宗 (2002) 邊界元素法在拉普拉斯方程反算問題之應用,中華民國第二十六屆全國力學會議。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/34448 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 對稱葛勒金邊界元素法(SGBEM)的最大優點為:能建立具對稱形式之系統矩陣,同時由於加權剩餘法之應用,使得奇異積分之處理較容易,且在數值精確度與收斂行為上,較傳統點配置邊界元素法(CBEM)表現為佳,因此在近年來,被廣泛應用在各領域之邊界元素法分析。本研究將針對均質等向材料之三維靜力問題,利用無限域基本解(Kevin’s fundamental solution),組成對偶邊界積分方程(DBIE),建立一採四邊形線性元素之SGBEM分析模式。對於SGBEM之雙重邊界積分中,所遭遇之奇異積分問題,包含弱奇異、強奇異與超奇異積分,將利用座標轉換與積分域投影技巧,配合基本解核函數之對稱特性與基本性質處理之。經由範例分析驗證可知,本研究所建立之SGBEM模式,應用在具有良好支承條件之三維靜力問題,能得到相當正確的分析結果。
在數值分析方法中,結合有限元素法(FEM)與邊界元素法(BEM)共同使用,能兼採兩者之優點,有利於分析幾何配置與材料性質複雜的問題。當採用SGBEM與FEM連結使用時,經由適當的處理技巧,能夠得到具對稱形式之整體系統矩陣,而不破壞原本有限元素部分之系統對稱性。在本研究所採用之FE~BE連結模式中,將藉由SGBEM推導式中與自由項係數相關之部分,建立FE與BE間節點力與曳引力之轉換關係。 然而,SGBEM應用於分析力邊界值問題時,不論其屬內域或外域問題,所得位移解均會存在有一剛體運動項,而有解非唯一之現象。本研究將討論此現象之內涵與成因,並彙整一些能去除剛體運動影響的方法,藉由範例分析,討論這些方法運用在SGBEM與FE~BE連結時之適用性。結果顯示,對於外力條件之合力與合力矩為零的一般力邊界值問題,這些方法多能有效的去除剛體運動,得到唯一且正確的解;而在應用自由表面截切技巧所從事之半無限域問題分析上,由於其外力條件之合力或合力矩不為零,且因自由表面之截切造成誤差,因此雖然能夠得到唯一解,但各種方法所得之結果,仍然會存在一些不合理的現象。在所檢驗的方法中,以基於Fredholm理論所建立之修正邊界積分方程,所得之結果相對上較佳。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | As compared to the conventional collocation boundary element method (CBEM), the primary advantage of the symmetric Galerkin boundary element method (SGBEM) is the ability to produce a symmetric system matrix. Besides, through the application of the weighted residual method in SGBEM, it becomes easier to regularize the singular integrals and shows better numerical behaviors than the conventional CBEM. In this study, a SGBEM procedure to form linear quadrilateral elements for 3-D elastostatic problems is established. The formulation adopts the form of dual boundary integral equations (DBIEs) based on the Kevin’s fundamental solutions. In order to evaluate the singular double integrals in the SGBEM, including the types of weak, strong or hyper-singularity, techniques of coordinate transformation and mappings of integral domains are utilized in company with the basic properties of kernel functions. Through some numerical examples, the validity of this SGBEM procedure in application to well-supported 3-D elastostatic problems is verified.
The coupling of FEM and BEM is a profitable result that exploits the advantages of each. When SGBEM is combined with FEM through appropriate techniques, a symmetric global system matrix can be obtained without ruining the symmetric virtue of the FE part. The FE~BE coupling strategy adopted in this study is to use the free-term components in the SGBEM, so that the equilibrium conditions between the nodal forces on the FE part and the nodal tractions on the BE part are reserved. Nevertheless, when SGBEM is applied to interior or exterior Neumann problems, the displacement solution cannot be uniquely determined because of the inevitable rigid body motion term involved. In this study, discussions on this phenomenon and methods that had been used to remove the rigid-body-motion terms are investigated for the problems modeled with the SGBEM and the FE~BE coupling formulations. For general equilibrated Neumann problems, the rigid body motions can be effectively removed by using these approaches. However, for half-space problems in which the free surface are modeled by limited number of elements, the solutions obtained are still not satisfactory because of the errors introduced from the truncation of the free surface. Among the methods investigated, the one using the modified boundary integral equations based on the Fredholm theory is relatively preferable. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T06:09:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-95-F90521105-1.pdf: 1921236 bytes, checksum: 7345f5858660cf96c7dc30b1984d79aa (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝 誌 i
摘 要 ii Abstract iii 目 錄 iv 圖表目錄 vii 第一章 前言 1 1.1 研究動機與目的 1 1.2 研究方向與方法 2 第二章 文獻回顧 4 2.1 邊界積分方程與邊界元素法 4 2.2 對稱化邊界元素法 9 2.3 奇異積分之規則化 13 2.4 有限元素與邊界元素之連結使用 15 2.5 邊界元素法遭遇之秩降問題 17 第三章 線彈性材料三維靜力問題之對稱邊界元素法 24 3.1 對偶邊界積分方程:u-BIE與t-BIE 24 3.2 邊界方程之離散化與加權剩餘法之應用 25 3.3 對稱葛勒金邊界元素法(SGBEM) 28 3.4 域內點位移與應力以及邊界應力之計算 30 第四章 SGBEM中之奇異積分處理 36 4.1 SGBEM中遭遇之各種奇異積分情況 36 4.2 奇異積分規則化之座標轉換技巧概述 37 4.3 各種奇異積分情況之處理 38 4.3.1 完全重合情況(coincident case) 38 4.3.2 邊緣相鄰情況(edge-adjacent case) 41 4.3.3 頂點相鄰情況(vertex-adjacent case) 42 4.4 具良好支承條件之彈性靜力問題分析實例 43 4.4.1 立方體受單軸張力 43 4.4.2 Leon問題 44 第五章 SGBEM與FEM之連結使用 54 5.1 SGBEM與FEM之結合 54 5.2 具良好支承條件之彈性靜力問題分析實例 56 5.2.1 矩形體受單軸張力 56 5.2.2 薄版受彎矩作用 57 第六章 SGBEM之解非唯一問題與處理方法 64 6.1 SGBEM於力邊界值問題中之解非唯一現象 64 6.2 外加點支承 66 6.3 奇異值分解-特徵值分解 67 6.4 奇異系統之規則化 69 6.5 修正邊界積分方程 70 6.5.1 修正強奇異邊界積分方程 71 6.5.2 修正超奇異邊界積分方程 75 6.6 綜合討論 77 第七章 SGBEM於力邊界值問題之分析例 80 7.1 內域問題-立方體受單軸張力 80 7.2 外域問題-無限域中球形空穴受內壓 81 7.3 半無限域問題 83 7.3.1 半無限域問題之分析模式 83 7.3.2 半無限域表面受鉛垂向圓形均佈載重 84 第八章 FEM~SGBEM連結模式於力邊界值問題之分析例 110 8.1 內域問題-單軸拉力問題 110 8.1.1 矩形體受單軸張力 110 8.1.2 立方體受單軸張力 112 8.2 半無限域問題 113 8.2.1 半無限域表面受鉛垂向圓形均佈載重 114 8.2.2 半無限域表面圓形剛性版受鉛垂向載重 115 8.2.3 半無限域中單樁受鉛垂向載重 117 第九章 結論與建議 143 9.1 結論 143 9.2 建議 144 參考文獻 145 附錄一 無限域靜力基本解 153 A1.1 無限域基本解各核函數 153 A1.2 無限域基本解各核函數之對稱特性 154 附錄二 積分領域之等義表示式與投影及分割關係 155 A2.1 三角形積分領域等義表示式之一 155 A2.2 三角形積分領域等義表示式之二 155 A2.3 三角形積分領域之投影關係 155 A2.4 四邊形積分領域之分割 156 附錄三 奇異積分之變數轉換操作 158 A3.1 完全重合情況(coincident case) 158 A3.2 邊緣相鄰情況(edge-adjacent case) 159 A3.3 頂點相鄰情況(vertex-adjacent case) 161 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 對稱葛勒金邊界元素法與有限元素∼邊界元素連結模式應用於三維靜力問題之分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Symmetric Galerkin BEM and FE~BE Coupling for 3D Elastostatic Problems | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 94-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 葉超雄(Chau-Shioung Yeh),黃燦輝(Tsan-Hwei Huang),陳正宗(Jeng-Tzong Chen),李洋傑(Yang-Jye Lee),廖文義(Wen-I Liao) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 葛勒金對稱邊界元素法,三維靜力分析,無限域靜力基本解,奇異積分,有限元素?邊界元素連結,解非唯一,半無限域問題, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | symmetric Galerkin BEM,3D elastostatics,singular integrals,FE~BE coupling,non-uniqueness,half-space problems, | en |
dc.relation.page | 162 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2006-05-22 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-95-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.88 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。