請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/33678
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 王泓仁 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-Fan Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃宇凡 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T05:44:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2006-07-18 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2006-07-18 | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2006-07-13 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 王泓仁 (2005), “台灣匯率對我國經濟金融活動之影響”, <<中央銀行季刊>> … , 27(1), 13–46
Aguilar, Javiera and Nydahl, Stefan (2000), “Central bank intervention and exchange rat: The case of sweden”, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institution and Money, 10, 303–322. Almekinders, G. J. and Eijffinger, S. C. W. (1994), “Daily bundesbank and federal reserve intervention: are they a reaction to change in the level and volatility of the dm/$ rate?.”, Empirical Economics, 19. Ballie, R. T. and Humpage, O. F. (1992), “Post-louvre intervention: did target zone stabilize the dollars?”, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Working paper 9203. Ballie, R. T. and Osterberg, W. P. (1997), “Central bank intervention and risk in the forward market.”, Journal of International Economics. Bonser-Neal, Catherine and Tanner, Glenn (1996), “Central bank intervention and the volatility of foreign exchange rates: evidence from the options market”, Jour- nal of International Money and Finance, 15(6), 853–878. Christiano, Lawrence J., Eichenbaum, Martin, and Evans, Charles L. (1998), “Monetary policy shocks: What have we learned and to what end?”, NBER Working Paper. Cushman, Davis O. and Zha, Tao (1997), “Identifying monetary policy in a small open economy under flexible exchange rate”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 39, 433–448. Dominguez, Kathryn M. (1990), “Market responses to coordinated central bank intervention”, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 32, 121– 163. (1998), “Central bank intervention and exchange rate volatility”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 17, 161–190. Dominguez, Kathryn M. and Frenkel, J. (1993), “Does foreign exchange intervention matters? the portfolio effect.”, American Economic Reviews, 83, 1356–1369. Dornbusch, Rudiger (1976), “Expectations and exchange rate dynamics”, Journal of Political Economy, 84(6), 1161–1176. 57 Eichenbaum, Martin and Evans, Charles L. (1995), “Some empirical evidence on the effect of shocks to monetary policy on exchange rates”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(4), 975–1009. Enders, Walter (2004), Applies Econometric Time Series., Wiley, 2 edition. Faust, Jon (1998), “The robustness of identified var conclusions about money”, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Plicy, 49, 207–244. Faust, Jon and Rogers, John H. (1999), “Monetary policy’s role in exchange rate behavior”, Technical report, Board of Governor of Federal Reserve System. Humpage, Owen F. (2003), “Government intervention in the foreign exchange market”, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Working Paper 03-15. Kaminsky, Graciela L. and Lewis, Karen K. (1996), “Does foreign exchange intervention signal future monetary policy?”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 37, 285–312. Kim, Soyoung (2003), “Monetary policy, foreign exchange intervention, and the exchange rate in a unifying framework”, Journal of International Economics, 60, 353–386. Kim, Suk-Joong, Kortian, Tro, and Sheen, Jeffrey (2000), “Central bank intervention and exchange rate volatility - australian evidence”, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institution and Money, 10, 381–405. Leeper, Eric M., Sims, Christopher A., and Zha, Tao (1996), “What does monetary policy do?”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Lin, Jin-Lung and Liu., Tian-Syh (2003), “Modeling Lunar Calendar Holiday Effects in Taiwan”, <<台灣經濟政策與預測>>, 33, 1–37 Obstfeld, Maurice (1990), “The effectiveness of foreign -exchange intervention: recent experiences:1985-1988”, in W. Branson, J. Frenkel, and M. Goldstein (eds.), International Policy Coordination and Exchange Rate Fluctuations, 197–237, University of Chicago Press. Ramey, Valerie (1993), “How important is the credit channel in the transmission of monetary policy?”, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Plicy, 39, 1–45. Sarno, Lucio and Taylor, Mark (2002), The Economics of Exchange Rates, chapter 7, 208–244, Cambridge University Press. Sarno, Lucio and Taylor, Mark P. (2001), “Official intervention in the foreign exchange rate markets: Is it effective and, if so, how does it work?”, Journal of Economic Literature, 39(3), 839–868. Sims, Christopher A. (1980), “Macroeconomics and reality”, Econometrica, 48. Stock, James H. and Watson, Mark W. (2001), “Vector autoregressions”, Journal of Economics Perspectives, 15(4), 101–115. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/33678 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 這篇文章討論與貨幣政策、外匯干預及匯率有關的兩個議題。第一個議題是外匯干預對匯率水準與匯率波動程度的影響,第二個議題是貨幣政策在有外匯干預及沒有外匯干預時的效果。我們使用結構性向量自我回歸(Structural vector-autoregression)模型來探討貨幣政策與外匯干預的關係,且在模型中放進了「央行持有國外資產變動」以測量干預的效果。我們另外採用GARCH模型來估計外匯干預對匯率波動程度的影響,且利用SVAR模型模擬貨幣政策在有外匯干預與沒有外匯干預時的效果。我們發現台灣外匯干預對匯率有顯著的影響:當一個正的外匯干預衝擊出現後,匯率會上升,台幣貶值,而這個效果主要是透過利率管道與Signaling管道來影響匯率。結果也顯示,當出現一個緊縮的貨幣政策衝擊後,匯率會在短期內就下降,但是幾個月之後會回到原始的水準,且這個匯率的反應在沒有外匯干預的時後幅度更大。最後我們發現,外匯干預可以在大部分的時候降低外匯干預,然而在經濟環境有巨大改變的時候,干預就反而會增加匯率的波動程度。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This dissertation explores two issues regarding the relationships between monetary
policy, foreign exchange intervention, and the exchange rate. The first is the effect of foreign exchange intervention on the level and the volatility of the exchange rate. The second issue is the effect of monetary policy with and without foreign exchange intervention. To investigate the relationship between monetary policy and foreign exchange intervention, a Structural vector-autoregression (SVAR) model is used which includes the variable of changes in the central bank’s foreign asset to measure the intervention effect. A GARCH model is also employed to estimate the effect of foreign exchange intervention on the exchange rate volatility. To understand the effect of monetary policy with and without foreign exchange intervention, counterfactual simulations are conducted based on the SVAR model. We find that the effect of foreign exchange intervention on the exchange rate is significant and substantial in Taiwan. The exchange rate rises in response to a positive foreign exchange intervention shock, and we find evidence for both of the interest rate channel and the signaling channel of the intervention effect. Results also show that, in response to contractionary monetary policy, the exchange rate falls sharply on impact and returns to the original level in a few months. Moreover, the response of exchange rate is more substantial without foreign exchange intervention. We also find that foreign exchange intervention can lower the volatility of the exchange rate in most of the time periods. However, in episodes of drastic changes in the economic environment, interventions tend to increase the volatility of the exchange rate. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T05:44:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-95-R93323017-1.pdf: 625734 bytes, checksum: 5c6c702e6f09a6ac3ff823c2b5bda780 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 1 Introduction ...................................... 1
2 Literature Review ................................. 5 2.1 Vector Autoregression ........................... 5 2.2 Monetary Policy and Exchange Rate................ 5 2.3 Foreign Exchange Intervention and Exchange Rate 7 3 Data, Models, and Estimation Methods.............. 11 3.1 The Model....................................... 11 3.1.1 The Structural VAR (SVAR)..................... 12 3.1.2 Estimation.................................... 13 3.1.3 Identification Issues......................... 14 3.1.4 Data.......................................... 14 3.1.5 The Model Specification....................... 17 3.2 Simulating Scenarios of No Intervention......... 19 3.2.1 Policy Reaction Function Method............... 20 3.2.2 Transmission Channel Method................... 21 3.3 Method of Examining the Relationship between Interventions and the Exchange Rate Volatility...... 23 4 Results of Structural VAR......................... 25 4.1 The Effectiveness of Foreign Exchange Intervention 27 4.1.1 The Effects of the Non-sterilized Intervention 27 4.1.2 Effects of the Sterilized Intervention........ 28 4.2 Assessing the Effects of Monetary Policy........ 31 4.2.1 Effects of Monetary Policy with Foreign Exchange Intervention............................... 32 4.2.2 Effects of Monetary Policy without Foreign Exchange Intervention............................... 33 5 Intervention and Volatility of the Exchange Rate 37 5.1 GARCH Specification............................. 39 5.2 The Effect of Foreign Exchange Intervention on Exchange Rate Volatility............................ 41 6 Conclusion........................................ 45 Appendices A The Equivalence of Two Normalization.............. 47 B Matrix presentation of PRFM and TCM............... 49 C Selecting an ARMA................................. 51 D Testing Existence of GARCH residual............... 54 E Quality of GARCH(1,1)............................. 55 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 貨幣政策與外匯干預對匯率的影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Effect of Monetary Policy and Foreign Exchange Intervention on the Exchange Rate | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 94-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 陳南光 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳中書,毛慶生 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 貨幣政策,外匯干預,匯率,向量自我回關模型,GARCH, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Monetary policy,Foreign exchange intervention,Exchange rate,Structural VAR,GARCH, | en |
dc.relation.page | 59 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2006-07-16 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 經濟學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-95-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 611.07 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。