請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/33515
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 邱祈榮(Chyi-Rong Chiou) | |
dc.contributor.author | Wei-Lun Tsai | en |
dc.contributor.author | 蔡維倫 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T04:44:49Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2007-07-31 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2006-07-31 | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2006-07-17 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 王鑫,1997。地景保育通訊。明文書局
林晏州,1995。行道樹景觀美質之評估。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告。 林務局,2002。國家步道系統建置與發展。行政院農業委員會林務局。 戚永年,1983。森林景觀評估系統之分析。國立臺灣大學森林學研究所碩士論文。 梁玉琦,2004。台灣生態區分區之研究。國立臺灣大學森林環境暨資源學研究所碩士論文。 黃棍琮,1997。溪頭森林步道景觀美質評估之研究。東海大學景觀學研究所碩士論文。 劉儒淵,2001。溪頭地區生物資源的研究概況、干擾及經營策略。生物多樣性論文集。 Baret, S., and D. Strasberg. 2005. The effects of opening trails on exotic plant invasion in protected areas on La Reunion Island (Mascarene Archipelago, Indian Ocean). Revue D Ecologie-La Terre Et La Vie 60:325-332. Bell, S. 2001a. Can a fresh look at the psychology of perception and the philosophy of aesthetics contribute to the better management of forest landscapes? CABI publishing, New York. Bell, S. 2001b. Landscape pattern, perception and visualisation in the visual management of forest. Landscape and Urban Planning 54:201 - 211. Bengston, D.N., D.P. Fan, and D.N. Celarier. 1999. A new approach to monitoring the social environment for natural resource management and policy: The case of US national forest benefits and values. Journal of Environmental Management 56:181-193. Bourassa, S.C. 1988. Toward a theory of landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning 15:241-252. Brown, T.C., and T.C. Daniel. 1984. Modeling Forest Scenic Beauty: Concepts and Application to Ponderosa Pine. USDA Research Paper RM-256. Brown, T.C., and T.C. Daniel. 1987. Context effects in perceived environmental quality assessment : scenic selection and landscape quality ratings. . Journal of environmental psychology 7:233-250. Brown, T.C., and T.C. Daniel. 1990. Scaling of Ratings: Concepts and Methods. USDA Research Paper RM-293:1 - 30. Brown, T.C., T.C. Daniel, H.W. Schroeder, and G.E. Brink. 1990. Analysis of ratings: A guide to RMRATE. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. General Technical Report RM-195. Brunson, M., and B. Shelby. 1992. Assessing recreational and scenic quality. Journal of Forestry 9:37-41. Buhyoff, G.J., J.D. Wellman, and T.C. Daniel. 1982. Predicting Scenic Quality for Moutain Pin Beetls and Western Spruce Budworm Damaged Forest Vistas. Forest Science 28:827 - 838. Buhyoff, J., and A. Leuschner. 1978. Estimating Psychological Disutility from Damaged Forest Stands. Forest Science 24:424 - 432. Buongiorno, J., and J.K. Gilless. 2003. Decision Methods for Forest Resource Management Academic Press. An imprint of Elsevier Science(USA). Chang, K.T. 2006. Introduction to Geographic Information Systems. Third ed. McGraw Hill, New York. Daniel, T.C. 2001. Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning 54:267-281. Daniel, T.C., and R.S. Boster. 1976. Measuring landscape esthetics:The Scenic Beauty Estimation Method. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service.:Research Paper, RM-167. Daniel, T.C., T.C. Brown, D.A. King, M.T. Richard, and W.P. Stewart. 1989. Perceived scenic beauty and contingent valuation of forest campground. Forest Science 35:76-90. ESRI. ArcGIS Desktop Help. ESRI. ARC/INFO Help. Fleischmann, K., P.J. Edwards, D. Ramseier, and J. Kollmann. 2005. Stand structure, species diversity and regeneration of an endemic palm forest on the Seychelles. African Journal of Ecology 43:291-301. Glickman, M.E. 1999. Parameter estimation in large dynamic paired comparison experiments. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C-Applied Statistics 48:377-394. Hayes, M., and J.M. Norman. 1994. Strategy in Fell Running - an Analysis of the Bob Graham Round. Journal of the Operational Research Society 45:1123-1130. Hiller, F.S., and G.J. Lieberman. 2001. Introduction to Operations Research. 7th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York. Kien, C.L., and F. Ugrasbul. 2004. Prediction of daily energy expenditure during a feeding trial using measurements of resting energy expenditure, fat-free mass, or Harris-Benedict equations. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 80:876-880. Lincoln, M. 2003. The Scenery Management System. . Lothian, A. 1999. Landscape and the philosophy of aesthetics: is landscape quality inherent in the landscape or in the eye of the beholder? Landscape and Urban Planning 44:177-198. Minetti, A.E. 1995. Optimum Gradient of Mountain Paths. Journal of Applied Physiology 79:1698-1703. Minetti, A.E., C. Moia, G.S. Roi, D. Susta, and G. Ferretti. 2002. Energy cost of walking and running at extreme uphill and downhill slopes. Journal of Applied Physiology 93:1039-1046. Norman, J.M. 2004. Running uphill: energy needs and Naismith's Rule. Journal of the Operational Research Society 55:308-311. Ohtaki, Y., M. Susumago, A. Suzuki, K. Sagawa, R. Nagatomi, and H. Inooka. 2005. Automatic classification of ambulatory movements and evaluation of energy consumptions utilizing accelerometers and a barometer. Microsystem Technologies-Micro-and Nanosystems-Information Storage and Processing Systems 11:1034-1040. Rees, W.G. 2004. Least-cost paths in mountainous terrain. Computers & Geosciences 30:203-209. Silvennionen, H., J. Alho, O. Kolehmainen, and T. Pukkala. 2001. Prediction models of landscape preferences at the forest stand level. Landscape and Urban Planning 56:11-20. Thorn, A.J., T.C. Daniel, and B. Orland. 1997. Data Visualisation for New Zealand Forestry. The second annual conference of GeoComputation. USDA Forest Service. 1995. Landscape aesthetics: A handbook for Scenery Management. Vining, J., T.C. Daniel, and H.W. Schroeder. 1984. Predicting scenic values in forested residential landscapes. Journal of Leisure Research 16:124-135. Weinstoerffer, J., and P. Girardin. 2000. Assessment of the contribution of land use pattern and intensity to landscape quality : use of a landscape indicator. . Ecological Modeling. 130:95-109. Wing, M.G., and R. Johnson. 2001. Quantifying Forest Visibility with Spatial Data. Environmental Management 27:411 - 420. Xiang, W.N. 1996. A GIS based method for trail alignment planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 35:11-23. Zube, E.H., J.L. Sell, and J.G. Taylor. 1982. Landscape percepation: Research, application and theory. Landscape Planning 9:1-33. 網路資料: 臺大實驗林管理處. http://www.exfo.ntu.edu.tw/index.htm. Wikipedia, Naismith's rule. http://enikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/33515 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 森林資源是休閒遊憩活動的一項重要資源,尤以現今以永續生態經營為目標,森林資源於遊憩上所扮演的角色日趨重要;路線的規劃在旅遊行程中是核心的部分,旅遊路線的規劃並非容易的事情,因其必需考慮許多面向,如時間、體力等,這些必需被考慮的面向是一種條件的限制;必需充分的掌握遊憩地區的資訊,才能夠妥善規劃。旅遊路線的規劃屬於線型資料分析的範疇,藉由地理資訊系統內的動態路段分析,可獲取道路上各項資訊的分佈;本研究使用溪頭森林遊樂地區的基本資料,如數值高程模型,整合地理資訊系統的分析技術與各項旅遊因子的計算方式,推算時間成本、體能消耗、美質感受與風景豐富度四項影響旅遊行程的因子在各路段分佈的情形。於本研究中發現,山區行走的時間成本受坡率的影響遠大於路線的長度,體能的消耗上,同樣的坡率值中上坡所消耗的體能遠比下坡大,此兩個因子與坡率息息相關。
藉由各路段的資訊配合動態規劃的概念,使用地理資訊系統路網分析的功能,可依照不同的旅遊目的尋求最佳化的旅遊路徑;本研究假設同樣的出發點與目的地,選擇四種不同的目的,即時間花費最短、美質感受最高、風景歧異度最大以及體能消耗最大試驗;研究的結果發現,若以最短時間為目的所分析出的最佳路徑,則無法得到最高的美質分數與最大的風景歧異度,且所規劃出的路線也並非一般所認知的直線距離或易於行走的路面。由研究的過程得知,充份的掌握地區的資訊才能夠有效規劃出最佳的路徑;且地理資訊系統對於旅遊路線的分析是非常實用的工具,其不僅將資訊良好整合亦可用以計算分析求得結果;因此藉由地理資訊系統的應用與計算不同因子的方法整合可有效獲得資訊,並且充份掌握與應用。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Recreational activities play an important role in forest resource, especially in pursuing the objective of sustainable ecosystem management. The main part in travel is the route planning which is difficult to organize. A well-planned travel route has to be concerned with the whole aspects, for instance, the time and the consumption of physical strength. Those aspects need sufficient information to plan the route. Linear data analysis is applied to plan travel routes, and further dynamic segmentation in GIS (Geographic Information System) can extract many kinds of information along the route. In this research, a DEM (Digital Elevation Model) of Chi-Tou Forest Recreational Area is used, and the equations of traveling constraints are integrated with the functions in GIS. The results demonstrated that the traveling constraints on time and physical strength are affected more by slope than the distance of the route.
The optimum travel route for different traveling purposes can be obtained using network analysis in GIS. In this research, the travel route from the same starting point and terminal stops were chosen to assess the traveling purposes by evaluating the shortest time, the highest aesthetic weighted score, the maximum diversity of scenery, and the maximum energy consumption of physical strength. The results show that the optimum route can only satisfy one purpose. On the other hand, the optimum route for the shortest time can not be the optimum route for the other purposes. During the research process, sufficient information of the recreational site helps better plan the travel route. Furthermore, GIS is a useful tool for analyzing travel routes. It can not only integrate the information well but also present the results well. Therefore, GIS can be needed for analyzing linear data efficiently. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T04:44:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-95-R93625003-1.pdf: 7683224 bytes, checksum: 789623303c547b8d1a7b4176a6fd6cba (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要.....................................................I
Abstract................................................II 目錄...................................................III 圖目錄...................................................V 表目錄.................................................VII 方程式目錄..............................................IX 目錄 壹、前言..................................................1 一、研究動機..............................................1 二、研究目的..............................................3 貳、文獻回顧..............................................5 一、森林美學評估..........................................5 (一)森林景觀評估的目的..................................5 (二)森林景觀評估方法之理論..............................9 (三)森林景觀評估的方法.................................13 二、道路與森林景觀的關聯.................................19 (一)道路分析的相關理論.................................19 (二)道路在旅遊路線上的意義.............................25 (三)旅行條件的計算.....................................29 參、材料與方法...........................................37 一、研究材料.............................................37 (一)研究區域概況.......................................37 (二)各土地覆蓋型照片...................................38 (三)分析應用圖層.......................................39 (四)分析因子的整理與製作...............................41 (五)車道與步道的資訊分佈...............................43 (六)分析應用軟體.......................................43 二、研究流程.............................................45 三、研究方法.............................................47 (一)美質分數圖的繪製...................................47 (二)旅行條件的計算.....................................49 (三)步道路徑最佳化選擇.................................52 肆、結果與討論...........................................53 一、美質分數圖的繪製.....................................53 (一)各土地覆蓋型照片的拍攝.............................53 (二)美質分數的調查.....................................55 二、分析圖層的整理與製作.................................65 (一)坡度圖層...........................................65 (二)土地覆蓋型圖層.....................................69 (三)分析因子圖層.......................................71 (四)車道與步道圖層.....................................73 三、車道與步道的資訊分佈.................................75 (一)坡度因子分佈 .......................................75 (二)土地覆蓋型因子分佈.................................79 (三)各路段之美質加權分數...............................81 四、旅行條件的計算.......................................85 五、步道路徑最佳化選擇...................................89 (一)以最短時間為目的...................................89 (二)以最高美質感受為目的...............................91 (三)以最大風景豐富度為目的.............................93 伍、結論與建議..........................................103 一、時間成本............................................103 二、體能消耗............................................103 三、美質感受............................................104 四、風景豐富度..........................................104 五、步道路徑之最佳化選擇................................105 六、建議................................................106 陸、參考文獻............................................107 附錄1 配對比較法調查問卷................................113 附錄2 各路段資訊總表....................................119 附錄3 各路段詳細資訊....................................125 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 溪頭地區步道美質、時間與熱量消耗之路網分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Network Analysis on the Aesthetics, Time, and Calorie Consumption for Travel Trails in Chi-Tou Forest Recreational Area. | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 94-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張康聰(Kang-Tsung Chang),張俊彥(Chun-Yen Chang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 森林美質,熱量消耗,路網分析,地理資訊系統, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Forest Aesthetics,Calorie Consumption,Network Analysis,GIS, | en |
dc.relation.page | 180 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2006-07-18 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 森林環境暨資源學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 森林環境暨資源學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-95-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 7.5 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。