Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 商學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/33476
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor張重昭
dc.contributor.authorYu-Ting Linen
dc.contributor.author林鈺婷zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-13T04:42:41Z-
dc.date.available2006-07-20
dc.date.copyright2006-07-20
dc.date.issued2006
dc.date.submitted2006-07-17
dc.identifier.citationAggaewal, Pankaj (2004), “The Effects of Brand Relationship Norms on Consumer Attitudes and Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31(June), pp87-101
Aggaewal, Pankaj and Sharmistha Law (2005), “Role of Relationship Norms in Processing Brand Information,” Journal of Consumer Research, 32(Dec), pp453-464
Berkowitz, Leonard (1987), “Mood, Self-Awareness, and Willingness to Help,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(April), pp721-729
Bies, R.J. (1986), “Identifying Principles of Interactional Justice: The Case of Corporate Recruiting,” in Moving Beyond Equity Theory: New Directions on Organizational Justice, R.J. Bies, chair. Symposium presented at the meeting of the Academy of Management, Chicago.
Bies, R.J. (1987), “The Predicament of Injustice: The Management of Moral Outrage,” in Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 9, L.L. Cummings and B.M. Staw, eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp289-319
Bies, R.J. and D.L. Shapiro (1987), “International Fairness Judgment: The Influence of Causal Accounts,” Social Justice Research, 1, pp199-218
Bolton E. Lisa, Luk Warlop and Joseph W. Alba (2003), “Consumer Perceptions of Price (Un)Fairness,” Journal of Consumer Research, 29(March), pp474-491
Campbell C. Margaret (1999), “Perceptions of Price Unfairness:Antecedents and Consequences,” Journal of Marketing Research, 36(May), pp187-199
Clark, Margaret S. and Judson Mills (1979), “Interpersonal Attraction in Exchange and Communal Relationships,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(Jan), pp12-24
Clark, Margaret S. (1981), “Noncomparability of Benefits Given and Received: A Cue to the Existence of Friendship,” Social Psychology Quarterly, 44(December), pp375-381
Clark, Margaret S. (1984), “Record Keeping in Two Types of Relationships,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(Mar), pp549-557
Clark, Margaret S., Robert Oullette, Martha C. Powell, and Sandra Milberg (1987), “Recipient’s Mood, Relationship Type and Helping,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(July), pp94-103
Clark, Margaret S., Judson Mills, and David M. Corcoran (1989), “Keeping Track of Needs and Inputs of Friends and Strangers,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15(December), pp533-542
Clark, Margaret S. and Taraban, Carolyn (1991), “reactions to and Willingness to Express Emotion in Communal and Exchange Relationships,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27. pp324-336
Clark, Margaret S. and Judson Mills (1993), “The Difference between Communal and Exchange Relationships: What It Is and Is Not,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(December), pp684-691
Einhorn, Michael A. (1994), “Optimal Nonuniform Pricing With Generalized Consumer Choice,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 42(March), pp105-112
Fang Ing-Haur (2005), “Buyer-Seller Relationship as a Moderator for Service Failure-Customer Satisfaction Relations,” National Taiwan University Master of Business Administration, Academic thesis.
Folkes (1984), “Consumer reactions to product failure: an attributional approach,” Journal of Consumer Research, 10(March), pp398-409
Graham, Sandra, Cynthia Hudley, and Estella Williams (1992), “Attributional and Emotional Determinants of Agression among African-American and Latino Young Adolescents,” Developmental Psychology, 28(4), pp731-740
Homburg Christian, Wayne D. Hoyer, and Nicole Koschate (2005), “Customers’ Reactions to Price Increase: Do Customer Satisfaction and Perceived Motive Fairness Matter?” Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.33, No. 1, pp36-49
Huang Jen-Hung and Chia-Yen Lin (2005), “The Explanation Effects on Consumer Perceived Justice, Satisfaction and Loyalty Improvement: An Exploratory Study,” The Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, Vol.7, Num.2, September, pp212-218
Isen, Alice M. and Thomas E. Shalker (1982), “The Effect of Feeling State on Evaluation of Positive, Neutral and Negative Stimuli: When You Accentuate the Positive, Do You Eliminate the Negative?” Social Psychology Quarterly, 45(March), pp58-63
Kahneman, Daniel, Jack L Knetsch and Richard H Thaler (1986), “Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics,” The Journal of Business, 59(Oct), pp285-300
Lassar, Walfried M, Valerie S Folkes, Dhruv Grewal and Carolyn Costley (1998), “Consumer affective reactions to product problems when the timing of warranty expiration varies,” Journal of Business Research, 42(Jul), pp265-270
Li Woan-Hwa (2004), “The Effects of The Reasons of A Price Increase, Product Characters, and Market Situations on Price Perceptions,” National Taiwan University Master of Business Administration, Academic thesis.
Sen, Sankar, Zeynep Gurhan-Canli, and Vicki Morwitz (2001), “Withholding Consumption: A Social Dilemma Perspective on Consumer Boycotts,” Journal of Consumer Research, 28(December), pp399-417
Vaidyanathan Rajiv, Praveen Aggarwal (2003), “Who is the Fairest of Them All? An Attributional Approach to Price Fairness Perceptions,” Journal of Business Research, 56(Jun), pp453-463
Weiner B. (1980), “A cognitive (attribution)-emotion-action model of motivated behavior: an analysis of judgments of help-giving,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(Feb), pp186-200
Weiner B. (1992), “Human motivation: metaphors, theories and research,” Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Wang Shiuan-Yiing (2004), “The Effect of the Reasons of Price Inflation on Consumers’ Perceived Price Fairness and Brand Reputation,” National Taiwan University Master of Business Administration, Academic thesis.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/33476-
dc.description.abstract本研究討論當廠商將其商品或服務的價格提高時,它們是否有提供漲價的理由,分別對消費者態度的影響。又如果在廠商有提供漲價的理由的情況下,那麼該理由的廠商可控制程度(高度vs中度vs低度)又將如何影響消費者對此廠商漲價行為的態度表現呢?我們並加入顧客關係類型(共有關係vs交換關係)做為干擾變數,來探討廠商與顧客間的關係,對於消費者對漲價的態度將有何種影響。
研究結果顯示:(一)當消費者面臨廠商將商品或服務價格提高時,如果廠商有主動提供漲價的理由,相對於廠商不提供任何理由解釋其漲價背後的原因,前者會使消費者有較好的態度。(二)若是在廠商有提供漲價理由的情形之下再細分,我們發現不同的漲價理由會影響消費者對於廠商漲價行為的態度;消費者對於廠商具有低度與中度可控制程度的理由,接受的程度高於廠商具有高度可控制程度的理由,同時對前者的態度也較佳。(三)若是考慮廠商與消費者間的關係類型,我們發現不同的顧客關係類型會影響消費者對於廠商漲價行為的態度;與廠商具有共有關係的消費者,當他們面臨廠商漲價時,不論是有無提供理由、提供的理由的廠商可控制程度為何,共有關係的消費者接受度都高於交換關係的消費者,態度也較佳。(四)同時觀察廠商對提供的漲價理由的可控制程度與顧客關係類型,我們發現在廠商高度可控制(可控制理由)與廠商低度可控制的漲價理由(不可控制理由)之下,兩種關係的消費者態度是沒有顯著差異的;但是值得令人注意的是,在中度可控制程度的廠商漲價理由下,共有關係的消費者對於廠商漲價行為的接受度與態度,顯著優於交換關係的消費者。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis research discusses the effects on consumers’ attitudes when firms raise the price of their products or service. Whether firms provide the reasons of their price increase behavior or not will influence consumers’ attitudes. Under the condition that firms do provide the price increase reasons, the firms’ controllability of these price increase reasons (high degree vs. medium degree vs. low degree) will influence consumers’ attitude, too. We also add the customer relationship type (communal vs. exchange relationship) as the moderator. We want to study how the relationship types between firms and customers will influence consumers’ attitudes toward price increase.
The empirical results show that: 1. When firms raise the price of their products or service, consumers will have better attitudes if firms have provided price increase reasons. 2. We find that consumers will have different attitudes toward different price increase reasons. Consumers have better attitudes and higher acceptance when the firms’ controllability degree of these price increase reasons are low and medium. 3. If we consider the relationship type between firms and customers, we find that different types of relationship will make customers’ attitudes different. Customers who have communal relationship with firms will have better attitudes and higher acceptance toward firms’ price increase behavior than those who have exchange relationship with firms. 4. We look at both firms’ controllability of these price increase reasons and the customer relationship types with firms on consumers’ attitude effects. We find that when firms’ have high controllability of price increase reasons, the attitudes of the two kinds
of consumers are the same. And when firms’ controllability of price increase reason is low degree, the attitudes of the two kinds of consumers also have no difference. But we notice that under the condition of medium degree controllability price increase reason, communal customers will have better attitudes and higher acceptance toward firms’ price increase behavior than exchange customers do.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T04:42:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-95-R93741036-1.pdf: 3753275 bytes, checksum: 46bee1ee1b7edf37b9caf2531240ae66 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2006
en
dc.description.tableofcontentsAbstract II
Contents III
Figure contents V
Table contents VI

Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 The motivation of this research 1
1.2 The purpose of this research 2
Chapter 2 Literature Review 4
2.1 The effects on consumers’ attitude of firms’ price increase behavior 4
2.2 Customer relationship types 11
Chapter 3 Research Hypotheses 14
3.1 Research concepts 14
3.2 Hypotheses 14
Chapter 4 Methodology 23
4.1 Pretest design 23
4.2 Main experiment design 30
Chapter 5 Research Result 34
5.1 Basic questionnaire data analyses 34
5.2 Hypotheses test 39
5.3 Research results summary 47
Chapter 6 Discussion 48
6.1 Conclusions 48
6.2 Marketing implications 49
6.3 Research limitations 51
6.4 Future suggestions 53
References 55
Appendix 1: Pretest questionnaire: Communal relationship manipulation 59
Appendix 2: Pretest questionnaire: Exchange relationship manipulation 61
Appendix 3: Pretest questionnaire: Price increase magnitude 63
Appendix 4: Pretest questionnaire: Price increase reason (1) 64
Appendix 5: Pretest questionnaire: Price increase reason (2) 65
Appendix 6: Main experiment questionnaire:
Communal relationship vs. High controllable reason 66
Appendix 7: Main experiment questionnaire:
Communal relationship vs. Medium controllable reason 69
Appendix 8: Main experiment questionnaire:
Communal relationship vs. Low controllable reason 72
Appendix 9: Main experiment questionnaire:
Communal relationship vs. No reason is provided 75
Appendix 10: Main experiment questionnaire:
Exchange relationship vs. High controllable reason 78
Appendix 11: Main experiment questionnaire:
Exchange relationship vs. Medium controllable reason 81
Appendix 12: Main experiment questionnaire:
Exchange relationship vs. Low controllable reason 84
Appendix 13: Main experiment questionnaire:
Exchange relationship vs. No reason is provided 87
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject關係類型zh_TW
dc.subject漲價理由zh_TW
dc.subjectrelationship typeen
dc.subjectprice increase reasonsen
dc.title廠商漲價理由與顧客關係類型對消費者對廠商漲價行為態度之影響zh_TW
dc.titleThe Effects of the Price Increase Reasons and Customer Relationship Types on Consumers' Attitudes Toward Firms' Price Increase Behavioren
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear94-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee方文昌,黃麗霞
dc.subject.keyword漲價理由,關係類型,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordprice increase reasons,relationship type,en
dc.relation.page89
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2006-07-18
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept商學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:商學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-95-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
3.67 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved