請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/33476完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張重昭 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu-Ting Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林鈺婷 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T04:42:41Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2006-07-20 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2006-07-20 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2006-07-17 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Aggaewal, Pankaj (2004), “The Effects of Brand Relationship Norms on Consumer Attitudes and Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31(June), pp87-101
Aggaewal, Pankaj and Sharmistha Law (2005), “Role of Relationship Norms in Processing Brand Information,” Journal of Consumer Research, 32(Dec), pp453-464 Berkowitz, Leonard (1987), “Mood, Self-Awareness, and Willingness to Help,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(April), pp721-729 Bies, R.J. (1986), “Identifying Principles of Interactional Justice: The Case of Corporate Recruiting,” in Moving Beyond Equity Theory: New Directions on Organizational Justice, R.J. Bies, chair. Symposium presented at the meeting of the Academy of Management, Chicago. Bies, R.J. (1987), “The Predicament of Injustice: The Management of Moral Outrage,” in Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 9, L.L. Cummings and B.M. Staw, eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp289-319 Bies, R.J. and D.L. Shapiro (1987), “International Fairness Judgment: The Influence of Causal Accounts,” Social Justice Research, 1, pp199-218 Bolton E. Lisa, Luk Warlop and Joseph W. Alba (2003), “Consumer Perceptions of Price (Un)Fairness,” Journal of Consumer Research, 29(March), pp474-491 Campbell C. Margaret (1999), “Perceptions of Price Unfairness:Antecedents and Consequences,” Journal of Marketing Research, 36(May), pp187-199 Clark, Margaret S. and Judson Mills (1979), “Interpersonal Attraction in Exchange and Communal Relationships,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(Jan), pp12-24 Clark, Margaret S. (1981), “Noncomparability of Benefits Given and Received: A Cue to the Existence of Friendship,” Social Psychology Quarterly, 44(December), pp375-381 Clark, Margaret S. (1984), “Record Keeping in Two Types of Relationships,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(Mar), pp549-557 Clark, Margaret S., Robert Oullette, Martha C. Powell, and Sandra Milberg (1987), “Recipient’s Mood, Relationship Type and Helping,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(July), pp94-103 Clark, Margaret S., Judson Mills, and David M. Corcoran (1989), “Keeping Track of Needs and Inputs of Friends and Strangers,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15(December), pp533-542 Clark, Margaret S. and Taraban, Carolyn (1991), “reactions to and Willingness to Express Emotion in Communal and Exchange Relationships,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27. pp324-336 Clark, Margaret S. and Judson Mills (1993), “The Difference between Communal and Exchange Relationships: What It Is and Is Not,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(December), pp684-691 Einhorn, Michael A. (1994), “Optimal Nonuniform Pricing With Generalized Consumer Choice,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 42(March), pp105-112 Fang Ing-Haur (2005), “Buyer-Seller Relationship as a Moderator for Service Failure-Customer Satisfaction Relations,” National Taiwan University Master of Business Administration, Academic thesis. Folkes (1984), “Consumer reactions to product failure: an attributional approach,” Journal of Consumer Research, 10(March), pp398-409 Graham, Sandra, Cynthia Hudley, and Estella Williams (1992), “Attributional and Emotional Determinants of Agression among African-American and Latino Young Adolescents,” Developmental Psychology, 28(4), pp731-740 Homburg Christian, Wayne D. Hoyer, and Nicole Koschate (2005), “Customers’ Reactions to Price Increase: Do Customer Satisfaction and Perceived Motive Fairness Matter?” Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.33, No. 1, pp36-49 Huang Jen-Hung and Chia-Yen Lin (2005), “The Explanation Effects on Consumer Perceived Justice, Satisfaction and Loyalty Improvement: An Exploratory Study,” The Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, Vol.7, Num.2, September, pp212-218 Isen, Alice M. and Thomas E. Shalker (1982), “The Effect of Feeling State on Evaluation of Positive, Neutral and Negative Stimuli: When You Accentuate the Positive, Do You Eliminate the Negative?” Social Psychology Quarterly, 45(March), pp58-63 Kahneman, Daniel, Jack L Knetsch and Richard H Thaler (1986), “Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics,” The Journal of Business, 59(Oct), pp285-300 Lassar, Walfried M, Valerie S Folkes, Dhruv Grewal and Carolyn Costley (1998), “Consumer affective reactions to product problems when the timing of warranty expiration varies,” Journal of Business Research, 42(Jul), pp265-270 Li Woan-Hwa (2004), “The Effects of The Reasons of A Price Increase, Product Characters, and Market Situations on Price Perceptions,” National Taiwan University Master of Business Administration, Academic thesis. Sen, Sankar, Zeynep Gurhan-Canli, and Vicki Morwitz (2001), “Withholding Consumption: A Social Dilemma Perspective on Consumer Boycotts,” Journal of Consumer Research, 28(December), pp399-417 Vaidyanathan Rajiv, Praveen Aggarwal (2003), “Who is the Fairest of Them All? An Attributional Approach to Price Fairness Perceptions,” Journal of Business Research, 56(Jun), pp453-463 Weiner B. (1980), “A cognitive (attribution)-emotion-action model of motivated behavior: an analysis of judgments of help-giving,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(Feb), pp186-200 Weiner B. (1992), “Human motivation: metaphors, theories and research,” Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. Wang Shiuan-Yiing (2004), “The Effect of the Reasons of Price Inflation on Consumers’ Perceived Price Fairness and Brand Reputation,” National Taiwan University Master of Business Administration, Academic thesis. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/33476 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究討論當廠商將其商品或服務的價格提高時,它們是否有提供漲價的理由,分別對消費者態度的影響。又如果在廠商有提供漲價的理由的情況下,那麼該理由的廠商可控制程度(高度vs中度vs低度)又將如何影響消費者對此廠商漲價行為的態度表現呢?我們並加入顧客關係類型(共有關係vs交換關係)做為干擾變數,來探討廠商與顧客間的關係,對於消費者對漲價的態度將有何種影響。
研究結果顯示:(一)當消費者面臨廠商將商品或服務價格提高時,如果廠商有主動提供漲價的理由,相對於廠商不提供任何理由解釋其漲價背後的原因,前者會使消費者有較好的態度。(二)若是在廠商有提供漲價理由的情形之下再細分,我們發現不同的漲價理由會影響消費者對於廠商漲價行為的態度;消費者對於廠商具有低度與中度可控制程度的理由,接受的程度高於廠商具有高度可控制程度的理由,同時對前者的態度也較佳。(三)若是考慮廠商與消費者間的關係類型,我們發現不同的顧客關係類型會影響消費者對於廠商漲價行為的態度;與廠商具有共有關係的消費者,當他們面臨廠商漲價時,不論是有無提供理由、提供的理由的廠商可控制程度為何,共有關係的消費者接受度都高於交換關係的消費者,態度也較佳。(四)同時觀察廠商對提供的漲價理由的可控制程度與顧客關係類型,我們發現在廠商高度可控制(可控制理由)與廠商低度可控制的漲價理由(不可控制理由)之下,兩種關係的消費者態度是沒有顯著差異的;但是值得令人注意的是,在中度可控制程度的廠商漲價理由下,共有關係的消費者對於廠商漲價行為的接受度與態度,顯著優於交換關係的消費者。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This research discusses the effects on consumers’ attitudes when firms raise the price of their products or service. Whether firms provide the reasons of their price increase behavior or not will influence consumers’ attitudes. Under the condition that firms do provide the price increase reasons, the firms’ controllability of these price increase reasons (high degree vs. medium degree vs. low degree) will influence consumers’ attitude, too. We also add the customer relationship type (communal vs. exchange relationship) as the moderator. We want to study how the relationship types between firms and customers will influence consumers’ attitudes toward price increase.
The empirical results show that: 1. When firms raise the price of their products or service, consumers will have better attitudes if firms have provided price increase reasons. 2. We find that consumers will have different attitudes toward different price increase reasons. Consumers have better attitudes and higher acceptance when the firms’ controllability degree of these price increase reasons are low and medium. 3. If we consider the relationship type between firms and customers, we find that different types of relationship will make customers’ attitudes different. Customers who have communal relationship with firms will have better attitudes and higher acceptance toward firms’ price increase behavior than those who have exchange relationship with firms. 4. We look at both firms’ controllability of these price increase reasons and the customer relationship types with firms on consumers’ attitude effects. We find that when firms’ have high controllability of price increase reasons, the attitudes of the two kinds of consumers are the same. And when firms’ controllability of price increase reason is low degree, the attitudes of the two kinds of consumers also have no difference. But we notice that under the condition of medium degree controllability price increase reason, communal customers will have better attitudes and higher acceptance toward firms’ price increase behavior than exchange customers do. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T04:42:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-95-R93741036-1.pdf: 3753275 bytes, checksum: 46bee1ee1b7edf37b9caf2531240ae66 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Abstract II
Contents III Figure contents V Table contents VI Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 The motivation of this research 1 1.2 The purpose of this research 2 Chapter 2 Literature Review 4 2.1 The effects on consumers’ attitude of firms’ price increase behavior 4 2.2 Customer relationship types 11 Chapter 3 Research Hypotheses 14 3.1 Research concepts 14 3.2 Hypotheses 14 Chapter 4 Methodology 23 4.1 Pretest design 23 4.2 Main experiment design 30 Chapter 5 Research Result 34 5.1 Basic questionnaire data analyses 34 5.2 Hypotheses test 39 5.3 Research results summary 47 Chapter 6 Discussion 48 6.1 Conclusions 48 6.2 Marketing implications 49 6.3 Research limitations 51 6.4 Future suggestions 53 References 55 Appendix 1: Pretest questionnaire: Communal relationship manipulation 59 Appendix 2: Pretest questionnaire: Exchange relationship manipulation 61 Appendix 3: Pretest questionnaire: Price increase magnitude 63 Appendix 4: Pretest questionnaire: Price increase reason (1) 64 Appendix 5: Pretest questionnaire: Price increase reason (2) 65 Appendix 6: Main experiment questionnaire: Communal relationship vs. High controllable reason 66 Appendix 7: Main experiment questionnaire: Communal relationship vs. Medium controllable reason 69 Appendix 8: Main experiment questionnaire: Communal relationship vs. Low controllable reason 72 Appendix 9: Main experiment questionnaire: Communal relationship vs. No reason is provided 75 Appendix 10: Main experiment questionnaire: Exchange relationship vs. High controllable reason 78 Appendix 11: Main experiment questionnaire: Exchange relationship vs. Medium controllable reason 81 Appendix 12: Main experiment questionnaire: Exchange relationship vs. Low controllable reason 84 Appendix 13: Main experiment questionnaire: Exchange relationship vs. No reason is provided 87 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 關係類型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 漲價理由 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | relationship type | en |
| dc.subject | price increase reasons | en |
| dc.title | 廠商漲價理由與顧客關係類型對消費者對廠商漲價行為態度之影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Effects of the Price Increase Reasons and Customer Relationship Types on Consumers' Attitudes Toward Firms' Price Increase Behavior | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 94-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 方文昌,黃麗霞 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 漲價理由,關係類型, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | price increase reasons,relationship type, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 89 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2006-07-18 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 商學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-95-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 3.67 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
