請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/33407
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 吳俊傑(Chun-Chieh Wu) | |
dc.contributor.author | Shin-Gan Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳新淦 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T04:38:52Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-08-01 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2011-08-01 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-07-26 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 陳占慧,2005:策略性颱風觀測―共軛模式之颱風駛流敏感向量。國立臺灣大學大氣科學研究所,碩士論文,79頁。
曾忠一,2006:大氣科學中的反問題(上)(下)。國立編譯館 主編˙出版,1288頁。 Aberson, S. D., 2002: Two years of operational hurricane synoptic surveillance. Wea. Forecasting, 17, 1101–1110. _____, 2003: Targeted observations to improve operational tropical cyclone track forecast guidance. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 1613–1628. _____, 2008: Large forecast degradations due to synoptic surveillance during the 2004 and 2005 hurricane seasons. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 3138–3150. _____, and J. L. Franklin, 1999: Impact on hurricane track and intensity forecasts of GPS dropwindsonde observations from the first-season flights of the NOAA Gulfstream-IV jet aircraft. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 80, 421–427. _____, S. J. Majumdar, C. A. Reynolds, and B. J. Etherton, 2011: An observing system experiment for tropical cyclone targeting techniques using the Global Forecast System. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 895–907. Ancell, B., and G. J. Hakim, 2007: Comparing adjoint- and ensemble-sensitivity analysis with applications to observation targeting. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 4117–4134. Barkmeijer, J., R. Buizza, and T. N. Palmer, 1999: 3D-Var Hessian singular vectors and their potential use in ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 2333–2351. _____, _____, _____, K. Puri, and J. F. Mahfouf, 2001: Tropical singular vectors computed with linearized diabatic physics. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 127, 685–708. Bishop, C. H., and Z. Toth, 1999: Ensemble transformation and adaptive observations. J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 1748–1765. _____, B. J. Etherton, and S. J. Majumdar, 2001: Adaptive sampling with the ensemble transform Kalman filter. Part I: Theoretical aspects. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 420–436. Bougeault, P., and Coauthors, 2010: The THORPEX Interactive Grand Global Ensemble. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 91, 1059–1072. Buizza, R., and A. Montani, 1999: Targeted observations using singular vectors. J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 2965–2985. _____, C. Cardinali, G. Kelly, and J.-N. Thépaut, 2007: The value of observations. II: The value of observations located in singular-vector-based target areas. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 133, 1817–1832. Burpee, R. W., J. L. Franklin, S. J. Lord, R. E. Tuleya, and S. D. Aberson, 1996: The impact of Omega dropwindsondes on operational hurricane track forecast models. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 77, 925–933. Camargo, S. J., A. W. Robertson, S. J. Gaffney, P. Smyth, and M. Ghil, 2007: Cluster analysis of typhoon tracks. Part II: Large-scale circulation and ENSO. J. Climate, 20, 3654–3676. Cardinali, C., R. Buizza, G. Kelly, M. Shapiro, and J.-N. Thépaut, 2007: The value of observations. III: Influence of weather regimes on targeting. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 133, 1833–1842. Chan, J. C.-L., and W. M. Gray, 1982: Tropical cyclone movement and surrounding flow relationship. Mon. Wea. Rev., 110, 1354–1376. Charney, J. G., 1955: The use of primitive equations of motion in numerical prediction. Tellus, 7, 22–26. Chen, J.-H., M. S. Peng, C. A. Reynolds, and C.-C. Wu, 2009: Interpretation of tropical cyclone forecast sensitivity from the singular vector perspective. J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 3383–3400. Chen, S.-G., S. J. Majumdar, and C.-C. Wu, 2010: Properties of the ensemble transform Kalman filter adaptive sampling strategy for tropical cyclones. 29th Conf. on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology, Tucson, AZ, Amer. Meteor. Soc., Session 8A.1. _____, C.-C. Wu, J.-H. Chen, and K.-H. Chou, 2011: Validation and interpretation of adjoint-derived sensitivity steering vector as targeted observation guidance. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 1608–1625. Chou, K.-H., and C.-C. Wu, 2008: Development of the typhoon initialization in a mesoscale model – Combination of the bogused vortex with the dropwindsonde data in DOTSTAR. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 865–879. _____, _____, P.-H. Lin, and S. Majumdar, 2010: Validation of QuikSCAT wind vectors by dropwindsonde data from Dropwindsonde Observations for Typhoon Surveillance Near the Taiwan Region (DOTSTAR). J. Geophys. Res., 115, D02109, doi:10.1029/2009JD012131. _____, _____, P.-H. Lin, S. D. Aberson, M. Weissmann, F. Harnisch, and T. Nakazawa, 2011: The impact of dropwindsonde observations on typhoon track forecasts in DOTSTAR and T-PARC. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 1728–1743. Chu, K., Q. Xiao, Z. Tan, and J. Gu, 2011: A forecast sensitivity study on the intensity change of Typhoon Sinlaku (2008). J. Geophys. Res. (Under review) Elsberry, R. L., 1986: Some issues related to the theory of tropical cyclone motion. Tech. Rep. NPS 63-86-005, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, 23 pp. _____, and P. A. Harr, 2008: Tropical cyclone structure (TCS08) field experiment science basis, observational platforms, and strategy. Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci., 44, 209–231. Errico, R. M., 1997: What is an adjoint model? Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 78, 2577–2591. Fovell, R. G., K. L. Corbosiero, and H.-C. Kuo, 2009: Cloud microphysics impact on hurricane track as revealed in idealized experiments. J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 1764–1778. Gaspari, G., and S. E. Cohn, 1999: Construction of correlation functions in two and three dimensions. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 723–757. Grell, G. A., J. Dudhia, and D. R. Stauffer, 1994: A description of the fifth-generation Penn State-NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-398+STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, 122pp. Greybush, S. J., E. Kalnay, T. Miyoshi, K. Ide, and B. R. Hunt, 2011: Balance and ensemble Kalman filter localization techniques. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 511–522. Harnisch, F., and M. Weissmann, 2010: Sensitivity of typhoon forecasts to different subsets of targeted dropsonde observations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 2664–2680. Hodyss, D., and S. J. Majumdar, 2007: The contamination of ‘data impact’ in global models by rapidly growing mesoscale instabilities. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 133, 1865–1875. Hoover, B. T., 2009: Comments on “Interaction of Typhoon Shanshan (2006) with the midlatitude trough from both adjoint-derived sensitivity steering vector and potential vorticity perspectives”. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 4420–4424. _____, and M. C. Morgan, 2010: Validation of a tropical cyclone steering response function with a barotropic adjoint model. J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 1806–1816. Houtekamer, P. L., H. L. Mitchell, and X. Deng, 2009: Model error representation in an operational ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 2126–2143. Huang, Y.-H., M. T. Montgomery, and C.-C. Wu, 2011: Concentric eyewall formation in Typhoon Sinlaku (2008) - Part II: axisymmetric dynamical processes. J. Atmos. Sci. (accepted with minor revision) Hunt, B. R., E. J. Kostelich, and I. Szunyogh, 2007: Efficient data assimilation for spatiotemporal chaos: A local ensemble transform Kalman filter. Physica D, 230, 112–126. Joly, A., and Coauthors, 1997: The Fronts and Atlantic Storm-Track Experiment (FASTEX): Scientific objectives and experimental design. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 78, 1917–1940. _____, and Coauthors, 1999: Overview of the field phase of the Fronts and Atlantic Storm-Track Experiment (FASTEX) project. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 3131–3163. Jung, B.-J., H. M. Kim, F. Zhang, and C.-C. Wu, 2011: Effect of targeted dropsonde observations and best track data on track forecasts of Typhoon Sinlaku (2008) using the Ensemble Kalman Filter. (Submitted to Mon. Wea. Rev.) Kelly, G., J.-N. Thépaut, R. Buizza, and C. Cardinali, 2007: The value of observations. I: Data denial experiments for the Atlantic and the Pacific. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 133, 1803–1815. Kim, H. M., and B.-J. Jung, 2009a: Singular vector structure and evolution of a recurving tropical cyclone. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 505–524. _____, and _____, 2009b: Influence of moist physics and norms on singular vectors for a tropical cyclone. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 525–543. Kim, S. H., H. J. Kwon, and R. L. Elsberry, 2009: Beta gyres in global analysis fields. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 26, 984–994. Kurihara, Y., M. A. Bender, and R. J. Ross, 1993: An initialization scheme of hurricane models by vortex specification. Mon. Wea. Rev., 121, 2030–2045. _____, _____, R. E. Tuleya, and R. J. Ross, 1995: Improvements in the GFDL hurricane prediction system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 123, 2791–2801. Lander, M. A., 1996: Specific tropical cyclone track types and unusual tropical cyclone motions associated with a reverse-oriented monsoon trough in the western North Pacific. Wea. Forecasting, 11, 170–186. Langland, R. H., 2005: Issues in targeted observing. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 3409–3425. _____, and Coauthors, 1999: The North Pacific Experiment (NORPEX-98): Targeted observations for improved North American weather forecasts. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 80, 1363–1384. _____, and N. L. Baker, 2004: Estimation of observation impact using the NRL atmospheric variational data assimilation adjoint system. Tellus, 56A, 189–201. Leutbecher, M., 2005: On ensemble prediction using singular vectors started from forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 3038–3046. Lin, I-I, and Coauthors, 2011: Ocean's impact on the intensity of three recent typhoons (Fanapi, Malakas, and Megi) – Results from the ITOP field experiment. Impact of Typhoons in the Pacific (ITOP) Meeting, Sante Fe, USA, May 16-20, 2011. Lord, S. J., 1996: The impact on synoptic-scale forecasts over the United States of dropwindsonde observations taken in the northeast Pacific. Preprints, 11th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, Norfolk, VA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 70–71. Majumdar, S. J., C. H. Bishop, B. J. Etherton, and Z. Toth, 2002: Adaptive sampling with the ensemble transform Kalman filter. Part II: Field program implementation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 1356–1369. _____, S. D. Aberson, C. H. Bishop, R. Buizza, M. S. Peng and C. A. Reynolds, 2006: A comparison of adaptive observing guidance for Atlantic tropical cyclones. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 2354–2372. _____, K. J. Sellwood, D. Hodyss, Z. Toth, and Y. Song, 2010: Characteristics of target areas selected by the Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter for medium-range forecasts of high-impact winter weather. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 2803–2824. _____, and P. M. Finocchio, 2010: On the ability of global ensemble prediction systems to predict tropical cyclone track probabilities. Wea. Forecasting, 25, 659–680. _____, and Coauthors, 2011a: Targeted observations for improving numerical weather predicrion: An overview. (To be submitted to Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.) _____, S.-G. Chen, and C.-C. Wu, 2011b: Characteristics of ensemble transform Kalman filter adaptive sampling guidance for tropical cyclones. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 503–520. Mansfield, D., D. Richardson, and B. Truscott, 2005: An overview of the Atlantic THORPEX Regional Campaign, A-TReC. Proc. of the THORPEX Science Symposium, 6–10 December 2004, Montreal, Canada. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. McLay, J. G., C. H. Bishop, and C. A. Reynolds, 2007: The ensemble-transform scheme adapted for the generation of stochastic perturbations. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 133, 1257–1266. McTaggart-Cowan, R., J. R. Gyakum, and M. K. Yau, 2003: The influence of the downstream state on extratropical transition: Hurricane Earl (1998) case study. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 1910–1929. Molteni, F., R. Buizza, T. N. Palmer, and T. Petroliagis, 1996: The new ECMWF ensemble prediction system: Methodology and validation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 122, 73–119. Palmer, T. N., R. Gelaro, J. Barkmeijer, and R. Buizza, 1998: Singular vectors, metrics, and adaptive observations. J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 633–653. Park, Y.-Y., R. Buizza, and M. Leutbecher, 2008: TIGGE: Preliminary results on comparing and combining ensembles. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 134, 2029–2050. Peng, M. S., and C. A. Reynolds, 2006: Sensitivity of tropical cyclone forecasts as revealed by singular vectors. J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 2508–2528. _____, R. N. Maue, C. A. Reynolds, and R. L. Langland, 2007: Hurricanes Ivan, Jeanne, Karl (2004) and mid-latitude trough interactions. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 97, 221–237. Petersen, G.. N., S. J. Majumdar, and A. J. Thorpe, 2007: The properties of sensitive area predictions based on the ensemble transform Kalman filter (ETKF). Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 133, 697–710. Resiner, J., R. J. Rasmussen, and R. T. Bruintjes, 1998: Explicit forecasting of supercooled liquid water in winter storms using the MM5 mesoscale model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 124B, 1071–1107. Reynolds, C. A., M. S. Peng, S. J. Majumdar, S. D. Aberson, C. H. Bishop, and R. Buizza, 2007: Interpretation of adaptive observing guidance for Atlantic tropical cyclones. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 4006–4029. _____, J. Teixeira, and J. G.. McLay, 2008: Impact of stochastic convection on the ensemble transform. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 4517–4526. _____, M. S. Peng, and J.-H. Chen, 2009: Recurving tropical cyclones: Singular vector sensitivity and downstream impact. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 1320–1337. Riehl, H., W. H. Haggard, and R. W. Sanborn, 1956: On the prediction of 24-hour hurricane motion. J. Meteor., 13, 415–420. Ritchie, E. A., and R. L. Elsberry, 2003: Simulations of the extratropical transition of tropical cyclones: Contributions by the midlatitude upper-level trough to reintensification. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 2112–2128. Sellwood, K. J., S. J. Majumdar, B. E. Mapes, I. Szunyogh, 2008: Predicting the influence of observations on medium-range forecasts of atmospheric flow. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 134, 2011–2027. Simmons, A. J., and B. J. Hoskins, 1979: The downstream and upstream development of unstable baroclinic waves. J. Atmos. Sci., 36, 1239–1254. Szunyogh, I., E. J. Kostelich, G. Gyarmati, E. Kalnay, B. R. Hunt, E. Ott, E. Satterfield, and J. A. Yorke, 2008: A local ensemble transform Kalman filter data assimilation system for the NCEP global model. Tellus, 60A, 113–130. Torn, R. D., and G. J. Hakim, 2008: Ensemble-based sensitivity analysis. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 663–677. Toth, Z., and Coauthors, 2002: Adaptive observations at NCEP: Past, present, and future. Preprints, Symposium on Observations, Data Assimilation and Probabilistic Prediction, Orlando, FL, 13–17 January 2002, 185–190. Tuleya, R. E., and S. J. Lord, 1997: The impact of dropwindsonde data on GFDL hurricane model forecasts using global analyses. Wea. Forecasting, 12, 307–323. Wei, M., Z. Toth, R. Wobus, and Y. Zhu, 2008: Initial perturbations based on the ensemble transform (ET) technique in the NCEP global operational forecast system. Tellus, 60A, 62–79. Weissmann, M., R. Busen, A. Dӧrnbrack, S. Rahm, and O. Reitebuch, 2005: Targeted observations with an airborne wind lidar. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 22, 1706–1719. _____, F. Harnisch, C.-C. Wu, P.-H. Lin, Y. Ohta, K. Yamashita, Y.-K. Kim, E.-H. Jeon, T. Nakazawa, and S. D. Aberson, 2011a: The influence of dropsondes on typhoon track and mid-latitude forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 908–920. _____, R. H. Langland, C. Cardinali, P. M. Pauley, and S. Rahm, 2011b: Influence of airborne Doppler wind lidar profiles near Typhoon Sinlaku on ECMWF and NOGAPS forecasts. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc. (accepted) Whitaker, J. S., T. M. Hamill, X. Wei, Y. Song, and Z. Toth, 2008: Ensemble data assimilation with the NCEP global forecast system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 463–482. Wu, C.-C., 2006: Targeted observation and data assimilation for tropical cyclone track prediction. Proc. Sixth Int. Workshop on Tropical Cyclones, San Jose, Costa Rica, WMO/CAS/WWW, 409–423. _____, and K. A. Emanuel, 1995a: Potential vorticity diagnostics of hurricane movement. Part I: A case study of Hurricane Bob (1991). Mon. Wea. Rev., 123, 69–92. _____, and K. A. Emanuel, 1995b: Potential vorticity diagnostics of hurricane movement. Part II: Tropical Storm Ana (1991) and Hurricane Andrew (1992). Mon. Wea. Rev., 123, 93–109. _____, and Y.-H. Kuo, 1999: Typhoons affecting Taiwan: Current understanding and future challenges. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 80, 67–80. _____, T.-S. Huang, W.-P. Huang, and K.-H. Chou, 2003: A new look at the binary interaction: Potential vorticity diagnosis of the unusual southward movement of Typhoon Bopha (2000) and its interaction with Typhoon Saomai (2000). Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 1289–1300. _____, _____, and K.-H. Chou, 2004: Potential vorticity diagnosis of the key factors affecting the motion of Typhoon Sinlaku (2002). Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 2084–2093. _____, P.-H. Lin, S. D. Aberson, T.-C. Yeh, W.-P. Huang, J.-S. Hong, G..-C. Lu, K.-C. Hsu, I-I Lin, K.-H. Chou, P.-L. Lin, and C.-H. Liu, 2005: Dropwindsonde Observations for Typhoon Surveillance near the Taiwan Region (DOTSTAR): An Overview. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 86, 787–790. _____, J.-H. Chen, P.-H. Lin, and K.-H. Chou, 2007a: Targeted observations of tropical cyclone movement based on the adjoint-derived sensitivity steering vector. J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 2611–2626. _____, K.-H. Chou, P.-H. Lin, S. D. Aberson, M. S. Peng, and T. Nakazawa, 2007b: The impact of dropwindsonde data on typhoon track forecasts in DOTSTAR. Wea. Forecasting, 22, 1157–1176. _____, S.-G. Chen, J.-H. Chen, K.-H. Chou, and P.-H. Lin, 2009a: Interaction of Typhoon Shanshan (2006) with the mid-latitude trough from both adjoint-derived sensitivity steering vector and potential vorticity perspectives. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 852–862. _____, _____, _____, _____, and _____, 2009b: Reply. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 4425–4432. _____, J.-H. Chen, S. J. Majumdar, M. S. Peng, C. A. Reynolds, S. D. Aberson, R. Buizza, M. Yamaguchi, S.-G. Chen, T. Nakazawa, and K.-H. Chou, 2009c: Inter-comparison of targeted observation guidance for tropical cyclones in the North western Pacific. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 2471–2492. _____, K. K. W. Cheung and Y.-Y. Lo, 2009d: Numerical study of the rainfall event due to interaction of Typhoon Babs (1998) and the northeasterly monsoon. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 2049–2064. _____, G.-Y. Lien, J.-H. Chen, and F. Zhang, 2010: Assimilation of tropical cyclone track and structure based on the Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF). J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 3806–3822. _____, and S. J. Majumdar, 2010: Targeted observations for tropical cyclone track forecasting. Proc. Seventh Int. Workshop on Tropical Cyclones, La Réunion, France, WMO, Nov. 15–20, Special focus session 1a. _____, 2011: Integrating atmospheric observations of ITOP in a high-resolution mesoscale model based on EnKF data assimilation. Impact of Typhoons in the Pacific (ITOP) Meeting, Sante Fe, USA, May 16-20, 2011. _____, C.-C. Yang, S.-G. Chen, P.-H. Lin, and S. D. Aberson, 2011a: Potential vorticity diagnosis of the factors affecting the track of Typhoon Sinlaku (2008) and the impact from dropwindsonde data during T-PARC. (Submitted to Mon. Wea. Rev.) _____, Y.-H. Huang, and G.-Y. Lien, 2011b: Concentric eyewall formation in Typhoon Sinlaku (2008) - Part I: assimilation of T-PARC data based on the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF). Mon. Wea. Rev. (accepted with minor revision) Wu, L., and B. Wang, 2001: Effects of convective heating on movement and vertical coupling of tropical cyclones: A numerical study. J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 3639–3649. Yamaguchi, M., T. Iriguchi, T. Nakazawa, and C.-C. Wu, 2009: An observing system experiment for Typhoon Conson (2004) using a singular vector method and DOTSTAR data. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 2801–2816. _____, and S. J. Majumdar, 2010: Using TIGGE data to diagnose initial perturbations and their growth for tropical cyclone ensemble forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 3634–3655. _____, D. S. Nolan, M. Iskandarani, S. J. Majumdar, M. S. Peng, and C. A. Reynolds, 2011: Singular vectors for tropical cyclone-like vortices in a nondivergent barotropic framework. J. Atmos. Sci. (in press) Yang, C.-C., C.-C. Wu, K.-H. Chou, and C.-Y. Lee, 2008: Binary interaction between Typhoons Fengshen (2002) and Fungwong (2002) based on the potential vorticity diagnosis. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 4593–4611. Yang, S.-C., M. Corazza, A. Carrassi, E. Kalnay, and T. Miyoshi, 2009: Comparison of local ensemble transform Kalman filter, 3DVAR, and 4DVAR in a quasigeostrophic model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 693–709. Zou, X., F. Vandenberghe, M. Pondeca, and Y.-H Kuo, 1997: Introduction to adjoint techniques and the MM5 adjoint modeling system. NCAR Technical Note, NCAR/TN-435+STR, 110pp. [Available from NCAR, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307–3000]. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/33407 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 颱風策略性(標靶)觀測為尋找影響颱風預報的敏感區域,以便制定最佳(飛行)觀測位置,以改進颱風預報,亦應用於闡釋颱風移動與綜觀環境間的動力分析與連結。本論文的研究為探討「颱風駛流敏感共軛向量(adjoint-derived sensitivity steering vector, ADSSV)」與「系集變換卡爾曼濾波器(ensemble transform Kalman filter, ETKF)」兩種策略性觀測方法的敏感性特徵與物理意義。
研究第一部分以2006年珊珊颱風北轉運動為個案,主要ADSSV敏感區域位於颱風東邊的副熱帶高壓邊緣以及上游的中緯度槽線,位渦診斷分析亦支持ADSSV表現的敏感特徵。為了進一步對ADSSV梯度敏感性進行探討與驗證,針對初始時間2006年9月15日0000 UTC的ADSSV敏感與不敏感區域,以初始渦度加以擾動方式設計一些實驗,評估初始擾動對模式的影響,包括路徑模擬、深層平均駛流變化與擾動垂直結構發展。路徑模擬結果顯示位於兩個敏感區域之擾動造成的18–48小時平均路徑偏移(相較於無擾動的控制實驗)比低敏感區域的變化來得大。經由Lanczos濾波方法得到大尺度平均環境場後,整體而言,敏感區域的擾動實驗相較於控制實驗之850–250 hPa深層平均風差異的訊號隨著綜觀系統演變逐漸傳送至驗證區域。此外,初始擾動經非線性積分造成在驗證區域的深層平均風差異與ADSSV線性計算的深層平均駛流變化呈現良好的一致性,而此一致性隨積分時間增加而降低。低敏感區域之擾動造成的深層平均風變化不論方向或量值皆與ADSSV的計算較不一致,原因可能與初始擾動與北邊槽線產生的非線性交互作用有關。有關槽線(副熱帶高壓)針對中高(中低)對流層的擾動實驗造成動能差異的垂直發展與演變以及進一步評估位於較高ADSSV敏感性區域的影響,亦在論文中有詳細探討。 第二部分研究建立於由National Centers for Environmental Prediction(NCEP)、European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts(ECMWF)、Canadian Meteorological Centre(CMC)模式以及結合三者(COMBINED)的系集預報輸出所計算ETKF敏感性,較過去文獻特別的是此研究提出移除每個系集成員之颱風分量的一個新計算方式,並以觀測位置遠近調整觀測誤差的方法試圖降低誤差協方差矩陣中長距離的假性相關(long-distance spurious correlation)。本研究以2008年辛樂克颱風為個案,探討ETKF敏感性在熱帶氣旋環境下呈現的特徵。結果顯示濾除颱風分量後的ETKF敏感性相較於保留原有系集的計算更能有效突顯出環境流場的敏感特徵,並減少因系集颱風路徑預報分歧造成接近颱風自身的敏感性。比較ETKF敏感性與其對應的系集變異發現兩者之間具有相異的分布特徵;不同模式系集間的ETKF敏感性亦呈現獨特不同的結構,主要為ECMWF模式主宰,原因與奇異向量方法建構初始擾動的特性與發展有關。此外,利用COMBINED系集探討加入位於不同層觀測變數的敏感性、颱風生命期不同階段、隨最佳化時間演變、以及預報時間長短的敏感性之議題中ETKF敏感性表現的特性,以瞭解ETKF敏感性如何掌握影響颱風運動或環境預報誤差之大尺度動力特徵。同時檢視ETKF策略性觀測理論預測訊息變異的能力,整體來說可以表現出NCEP模式三維資料同化方法造成模式訊息的近似分布,並提供投落送觀測導致訊息變異的可能傳播及變化。 本論文研究結果提供ADSSV與ETKF策略性觀測理論更多物理詮釋,以及與大尺度綜觀環境特徵作連結,進一步瞭解此兩種理論的實用性與表現,在作業預報或科學研究基礎上,此策略性觀測的研究除提供特殊飛機觀測之有用參考外,亦為改善颱風預報問題的重要一環。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The main concept of the targeted observation is to make extra observations in most sensitive regions, which are expected to reduce uncertainties in the initial condition and thus decrease errors in numerical forecasts. Targeted observing methods not only can be used to design optimal flight routes for the typhoon surveillance, but would also be applied to study the dynamical sensitivity between tropical cyclones (TCs) and the synoptic-scale environmental features. This research consists of two parts in which two targeted observing theories, adjoint-derived sensitivity steering vector (ADSSV) and ensemble transform Kalman filter (ETKF), are examined.
In the first part, the initial vorticity fields associated with the ADSSV signals are systematically perturbed to examine the impact on model simulations and validate the ADSSV gradient sensitivity based on the case of Typhoon Shanshan (2006). Two distinct ADSSV features associated with the midlatitude trough and the subtropical high that affect the recurving motion of Shanshan are identified and also well supported by the potential vorticity diagnostics. The result from track simulations indicates that the perturbations associated with the trough and the subtropical high lead to more track deflection (18–48-h mean) than the perturbations in the region with low ADSSV sensitivity. For experiments perturbed in high ADSSV sensitivity region, the main feature of the 850–250-hPa deep-layer-mean (DLM) wind difference relative to the control run propagates along with the synoptic system into the final verification area. In addition, the change in the area-average DLM wind over the verification areas is generally consistent with the steering change derived from the ADSSV. The resemblance between the ADSSV and the DLM wind change appears decreased with the integration time. The effect of perturbations specifically introduced within the sensitive layers and the evaluation from the region with higher sensitivity are explored. The second part is to examine the characteristics of ETKF targets under the environment of TCs, including the comparison between the ensemble variance and the corresponding ETKF guidance, the sensitivity to hypothetical targeted variables at different levels and to the varying targeted times and forecast lead-times, as well as the evolution of ETKF guidance through the TC life cycle. In particular, a new way to calculate the ETKF signal variance reduction by removing the TC components in each ensemble member is proposed to effectively highlight the sensitivity to environmental features. Moreover, a method of scaling the observation errors according to the distance between the test probes and the ensemble mean TC center is adopted to reduce the likely spurious long-distance correlation in the error covariance matrix. The properties of ETKF guidance are explored based on the ensembles from National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP)、European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF)、Canadian Meteorological Centre (CMC) and all three combined ensembles for Typhoon Sinlaku (2008) with scientific interests. ETKF guidance with the TC removal is found to correspond to the neighboring environment instead of the storm itself. The comparison between the variance and ETKF guidance shows the marked difference from each other. ETKF guidance using the combined ensembles is dominated by ECMWF ensembles, as a consequence of singular vector for constructing initial ensemble perturbations. The ability of the ETKF to predict signal variance is evaluated by comparing with the NCEP Global Forecast System (GFS) signals. Overall, the ETKF-predicted signal variance appears to capture the pattern of NCEP GFS signal as a first-order approximation. As recommended in “The Seventh International Workshop on Tropical Cyclones” (IWTC-VII), the advanced science behind better understanding targeted observations is highly critical to improve the TC predictability. This study provides useful physical insights into the targeted observations and important steps in addressing this issue. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T04:38:52Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-F94229021-1.pdf: 39641749 bytes, checksum: 1a65960858844747334c93fcf85ec4fa (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
誌 謝 iii 中文摘要 v Abstract vii 目錄 ix 圖目錄 xiii 表目錄 xix 第1章 前言 1 1.1 研究背景與文獻回顧 1 1.1.1 颱風環境監測與策略性觀測 1 1.1.2 策略性觀測理論應用之研究回顧 4 1.2 研究動機與目的 7 第2章 研究結果(I)–ADSSV敏感區域之探討及驗證 9 2.1 研究方法 9 2.1.1 理論介紹:颱風駛流敏感共軛向量(adjoint-derived sensitivity steering vector, ADSSV) 9 2.1.2 擾動初始場之方法 10 2.1.3 實驗設計與模式設定 11 2.2 珊珊(Shanshan)颱風(2006)個案之綜觀分析 13 2.3 ADSSV敏感區域特徵及初始擾動場 14 2.4 初始擾動對模式模擬的影響 16 2.4.1 路徑模擬 16 2.4.2 深層平均駛流與ADSSV的比較 18 2.4.3 敏感層擾動之動能垂直結構 23 2.4.4 敏感區域影響的評估 24 2.5 小結與討論 25 第3章 研究結果(II)–ETKF敏感區域之特徵及分析 29 3.1 研究方法 29 3.1.1 理論介紹:系集變換卡爾曼濾波器(ensemble transform Kalman filter, ETKF) 29 3.1.2 系集模式與資料庫 32 3.1.3 濾除系集成員之颱風分量 33 3.2 辛樂克(Sinlaku)颱風(2008)個案之綜觀分析 35 3.3 系集變異分布、與ETKF的比較 36 3.3.1 系集變異分布 36 3.3.2 ETKF敏感區及濾除颱風分量之結果 38 3.3.3 系集變異與ETKF敏感性之比較 41 3.4 ETKF敏感區表現之特性 42 3.4.1 同化各層觀測量之敏感性 43 3.4.2 生命期不同階段之敏感性 44 3.4.3 隨最佳化時間的演變 45 3.4.4 對預報時間長短之敏感性 46 3.5 模式訊息(signals)與ETKF訊息變異之比較 47 3.6 小結與討論 49 第4章 總結 53 4.1 結語 53 4.2 未來展望 55 附錄 變換矩陣及特徵值分解 59 參考文獻 63 圖 73 表 120 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 颱風策略性觀測理論之特徵分析與驗證—駛流敏感共軛向量及系集變換卡爾曼濾波器 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Characteristics and Validation of the Targeted Observations for Tropical Cyclones — ADSSV and ETKF | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林博雄(Po-Hsiung Lin),林依依(I-I Lin),曾于恆(Yu-Heng Tseng),黃清勇(Ching-Yuang Huang),楊舒芝(Shu-Chih Yang),游政谷(Cheng-Ku Yu) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 策略性觀測,共軛技術,系集變換卡爾曼濾波器,資料同化,敏感性分析, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | targeted (adaptive) observation,adjoint technique,ensemble transform Kalman filter,data assimilation,sensitivity analysis, | en |
dc.relation.page | 122 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-07-27 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 大氣科學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 大氣科學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 38.71 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。