請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/33240完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳達仁(Dar-Zen Chen Ph.D.) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Siou-Zih Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林秀姿 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T04:30:43Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2016-08-22 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2011-08-22 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2011-07-27 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Acedo, F. J., C. Barroso, et al. (2006). 'The resource based theory: dissemination and main trends.' Strategic Management Journal 27(7): 621-636.
Agami, N. M. E., A. M. A. Omran, et al. (2008). 'An enhanced approach for trend impact analysis.' Technological Forecasting and Social Change 75(9): 1439-1450. Aksnes, D. W. (2003). 'Characteristics of highly cited papers.' Research Evaluation 12(3): 159-170. Aksnes, D., & Sivertsen, G. (2004). The effect of highly cited papers on national citation indicators. Scientometrics, 59(2), 213-224. Bank, J. and B. Cole (2008). Calculating the Jaccard Similarity Coefficient with Map Reduce for Entity Pairs in Wikipedia, Citeseer. Bhattacharya, S. and P. K. Basu (1998). 'Mapping a research area at the micro level using co-word analysis.' Scientometrics 43(3): 359-372. Boyack, K. W. and R. Klavans. (2010). 'Co citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately?' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Boyack, K. W., J. Y. Tsao, et al. (2009). 'A recursive process for mapping and clustering technology literatures: case study in solid-state lighting.' International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation 8(1): 51-87. Cantwell, J. and C. Noonan (2002). Technology sourcing by foreign-owned MNEs in Germany!VAn analysis using patent citations. EIBA conference, Athens. Chen, C. (2004). 'Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain visualization.' Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the United States of America 101(Suppl 1): 5303. Chen, C. (2006). 'CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57(3): 359-377. Chen, C., T. Cribbin, et al. (2002). 'Visualizing and tracking the growth of competing paradigms: Two case studies.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53(8): 678-689. Collier, R. and Mutugu, J. (2009). 'Who Owns the Clean Tech Revolution?' University of California, Berkeley. Dalkey, N. (1969). 'An experimental study of group opinion:: The Delphi method.' Futures 1(5): 408-426. Du Plessis, E. and S. P. Human (2007). 'The art of the Delphi technique: highlighting its scientific merit.' Health SA Gesondheid 12(4): 13-24. Fai, F. and N. Von Tunzelmann (2001). 'Industry-specific competencies and converging technological systems: evidence from patents.' Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 12(2): 141-170. Falkowski, T. and J. Bartelheimer (2005). 'Applying social network analysis methods to explore community dynamics.' Applications of Social Network Analysis: 189!V212. Fomin, V., M. Kuhn Pedersen, et al. (2008). 'Open Standards and Government Policy: Results of a Delphi Survey.' Communications of the Association for Information Systems 22(5): 459-484. Garfield, E. (1985). History of Citation Indexes for chemistry: A brief review. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 25(3), 170-174. Garfield, E. (1994). Research Fronts. (p.3-7) Garfield, E. and A. Welljams-Dorof (1992). 'Citation data: their use as quantitative indicators for science and technology evaluation and policy-making.' Science and Public Policy 19: 321-321. Girvan, M. and M. E. J. Newman (2002). 'Community structure in social and biological networks.' Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99(12): 7821. Glanzel, W. and H. J. Czerwon (1996). 'A new methodological approach to bibliographic coupling and its application to the national, regional and institutional level.' Scientometrics 37(2): 195-221. Ibekwe SanJuan, F. (2009). 'Information Science in the web era: A term based approach to domain mapping.' Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 46(1): 1-23. Jankovic, M. P., M. Kaufmann, et al. (2008). 'Active research fields in anesthesia: a document co-citation analysis of the anesthetic literature.' Anesthesia & Analgesia 106(5): 1524. Jarneving, B. (2005). A comparison of two bibliometric methods for mapping of the research front. Scientometrics, 65(2), 245-263. Jarneving, B. (2007). 'Bibliographic coupling and its application to research-front and other core documents.' Journal of Informetrics 1(4): 287-307. Jarneving, B. (2007). 'Complete graphs and bibliographic coupling: A test of the applicability of bibliographic coupling for the identification of cognitive cores on the field level.' Journal of Informetrics 1(4): 338-356. Kajikawa, Y., S. Fujimoto, et al. (2009). Detection of emerging research fronts in solar cell research. In 12th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI2009), in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (14-17, July, 2009). Kajikawa, Y., Yoshikawa, J., Takeda, Y., & Matsushima, K. (2008). Tracking emerging technologies in energy research: Toward a roadmap for sustainable energy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(6), 771-782. Kandylas, V., S. P. Upham, et al. (2008). 'Finding cohesive clusters for analyzing knowledge communities.' Knowledge and Information Systems 17(3): 335-354. Karki, M. (1997). Patent citation analysis: A policy analysis tool. World Patent Information, 19(4), 269-272. Kessler, M. (1963). 'Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers.' American documentation 14(1): 10-25. King, C. (2007). 'Despite slide in world share, US impact still looks strong.' Chemistry 20(125,799): 7.33. Klavans, R. and K. W. Boyack (2011). 'Using global mapping to create more accurate document level maps of research fields.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Lai, K., & Wu, S. (2005). Using the patent co-citation approach to establish a new patent classification system. Information Processing and Management, 41(2), 313-330. Laudel, G. (2003). 'Studying the brain drain: Can bibliometric methods help?' Scientometrics 57(2): 215-237. Lehmann, S., Lautrup, B., & Jackson, A. (2003). Citation networks in high energy physics. Physical Review E, 68(2), 26113. Leydesdorff, L. (1997). 'Why words and co-words cannot map the development of the sciences.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science 48(5): 418-427. Leydesdorff, L. (2007). 'Visualization of the citation impact environments of scientific journals: An online mapping exercise.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58(1): 25-38. Leydesdorff, L. and I. Hellsten (2006). 'Measuring the meaning of words in contexts: An automated analysis of controversies about'Monarch butterflies,'Frankenfoods,'and'stem cells'.' Scientometrics 67(2): 231-258. Liyanage, S. (1995). 'Breeding innovation clusters through collaborative research networks.' Technovation 15(9): 553-567. Mane, K. and K. Borner (2004). 'Mapping topics and topic bursts in PNAS.' Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101(Suppl 1): 5287. McGill, M. J. and G. Salton (1983). Introduction to modern information retrieval, McGraw-Hill. Meyer, M., U. Schaffer, et al. (2007). Transfer and Exchange of Knowledge in Accounting Research: a Citation and Co-citation Analysis of Accounting Journals from 1990 to 2004. Miguel, S., F. Moya-Anegon, et al. (2008). 'A new approach to institutional domain analysis: Multilevel research fronts structure.' Scientometrics 74(3): 331-344. Morris, S., C. DeYong, et al. (2002). 'DIVA: a visualization system for exploring document databases for technology forecasting.' Computers and industrial engineering 43(4): 841. Morris, S., Yen, G., Wu, Z., & Asnake, B. (2003). Time line visualization of research fronts. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 413-422 Moya-Anegon, F., V. Herrero-Solana, et al. (2006). 'A connectionist and multivariate approach to science maps: the SOM, clustering and MDS applied to library and information science research.' Journal of Information Science 32(1): 63. Narin, F. (1994). 'Patent bibliometrics.' Scientometrics 30(1): 147-155. Narin, F. and K. Hamilton (1996). 'Bibliometric performance measures.' Scientometrics 36(3): 293-310. Noyons, E. (2001). 'Bibliometric mapping of science in a policy context.' Scientometrics 50(1): 83-98. Persson, O. (1994). 'The intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS 19861990.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45(1): 31-38. Persson, O. (2010). Identifying research themes with weighted direct citation links. Journal of Informetrics (4)3: 415-422. Powell, C. (2003). 'The Delphi technique: myths and realities.' Journal of Advanced Nursing 41(4): 376-382. Propp, T., & Rip, A. (2006). Assessment tools for the management of new and emerging science and technology: state-of-the-art and research gaps: Ta NanoNed Working Paper No1, Centre for Studies of Science Technology and Society, University of Twente, the Netherlands. Ramos-Rodriguez, A. R. and J. Ruiz-Navarro (2004). 'Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: a bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980-2000.' Strategic Management Journal 25(10): 981-1004. Rosell, C. and A. Agrawal (2006). 'University patenting: Estimating the diminishing breadth of knowledge diffusion and consumption.' NBER Working paper. Rosin, P. L. (2001). 'Unimodal thresholding.' Pattern Recognition 34(11): 2083-2096. Saka, A. and M. Igami (2007). Mapping modern science using co-citation analysis. Schmidt, M., J. Glaser, et al. (2006). A methodological study for measuring the diversity of science. Schneider, J. W. and P. Borlund (2004). 'Introduction to bibliometrics for construction and maintenance of thesauri: Methodical considerations.' Journal of Documentation 60(5): 524-549. Shen, Y., G. Lin, et al. (2010). 'Combined DEMATEL techniques with novel MCDM for the organic light emitting diode technology selection.' Expert Systems with Applications. Shen, Y., S. Chang, et al. (2010). 'A hybrid selection model for emerging technology.' Technological Forecasting and Social Change 77(1): 151-166. Shibata, N., Y. Kajikawa, et al. (2008). 'Detecting emerging research fronts based on topological measures in citation networks of scientific publications.' Technovation 28(11): 758-775. Shibata, N., Y. Kajikawa, et al. (2008). Opportunity discovery by assessing the gap between science and technology case study of secondary batteries, IEEE. Shibata, N., Y. Kajikawa, et al. (2009). 'Comparative study on methods of detecting research fronts using different types of citation.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60(3): 571-580. Shibata, N., Y. Kajikawa, et al. (2010). 'Extracting the commercialization gap between science and technology--Case study of a solar cell.' Technological Forecasting and Social Change 77(7): 1147-1155. Shibata, N., Y. Kajikawa, et al. (2011). 'Measuring relatedness between communities in a citation network.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269. Small, H. (1993). 'Macro-level changes in the structure of co-citation clusters: 1983-1989.' Scientometrics 26(1): 5-20. Small, H. (1997). “Update on science mapping: Creating large document spaces.” Scientometrics 38(2): 275-293. Small, H. (2003). 'Paradigms, citations, and maps of science: A personal history.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54(5): 394-399. Small, H. (2006). 'Tracking and predicting growth areas in science.' Scientometrics 68(3): 595-610. Small, H. and B. Griffith (1974). 'The structure of scientific literatures I: Identifying and graphing specialties.' Social Studies of Science 4(1): 17. Small, H. and P. Upham (2009). 'Citation structure of an emerging research area on the verge of application.' Scientometrics 79(2): 365-375. Small, H. G. (1977). 'A co-citation model of a scientific specialty: A longitudinal study of collagen research.' Social studies of science 7(2): 139-166. Smith, L. (1981). 'Citation analysis.' Library trends 30(1): 83-106. Su, H. N. and P. C. Lee (2010). 'Mapping knowledge structure by keyword co-occurrence: a first look at journal papers in Technology Foresight.' Scientometrics 85(1): 65-79. Sun, T. and S. A. Morris (2008). 'Timeline and Crossmap Visualization of Patents.' Proceedings of WIS. Takeda, Y. and Y. Kajikawa (2009). 'Optics: a bibliometric approach to detect emerging research domains and intellectual bases.' Scientometrics 78(3): 543-558. Takeda, Y. and Y. Kajikawa (2010). 'Tracking modularity in citation networks.' Scientometrics 83(3): 783-792. Takeda, Y., S. Mae, et al. (2009). 'Nanobiotechnology as an emerging research domain from nanotechnology: A bibliometric approach.' Scientometrics 80(1): 23-38. Upham, S. and H. Small (2010). 'Emerging research fronts in science and technology: patterns of new knowledge development.' Scientometrics 83(1): 15-38. Upham, S., L. Rosenkopf, et al. (2010). 'Positioning knowledge: schools of thought and new knowledge creation.' Scientometrics 83(2): 555-581. Vlachy, J. (1982). 'Citation analysis in particle physics.' Czechoslovak Journal of Physics 32(10): 1187-1194. Vlachy, J. (1986). 'World publication output, research fronts and highly cited papers in the specialty of mesons and light nuclei.' Czechoslovak Journal of Physics 36(8): 989-994. Waaijer, C. J. F., C. A. van Bochove, et al. (2011). 'On the map: Nature and Science editorials.' Scientometrics 86(1): 99-112. Wallin, J. (2005). Bibliometric methods: pitfalls and possibilities. Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology, 97(5), 261-275. Wu, H. C., H. Y. Chen, et al. (2010). 'Unveiling the core technology structure for companies through patent information.' Technological Forecasting and Social Change 77(7): 1167-1178. Wu, H., H. Chen, et al. (2010). 'Unveiling the core technology structure for companies through patent information.' Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Yoon, B. U., C. B. Yoon, et al. (2002). 'On the development and application of a self!Vorganizing feature map!Vbased patent map.' R&D Management 32(4): 291-300. Zhu, X., Wu, Q., Zheng, Y., & Ma, X. (2004). Highly cited research papers and the evaluation of a research university: A case study: Peking University 1974–2003. Scientometrics, 60(2), 237-347. Zitt, M., A. Lelu, et al. (2010). 'Hybrid citation word representations in science mapping: Portolan charts of research fields?' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/33240 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究探討技術軌跡(Technology Trajectory)發展之時間落差(Temporal Gap)，以全球與美國智慧電網領域(Smart Grid)之專利為例。分析對象為2001/01/01至2010/12/31智慧電網領域之專利，並藉由萃取高被引專利、建立書目耦合對(Bibliographic Coupling, B.C.)引文網絡、滑動視窗和Girvan-Newman群集分析等技術分別產出全球與美國的科技軌跡圖。研究結果顯示，全球和美國科技軌跡的關係可依其前沿發展之時間落差定義為全球與美國兩個前沿在同一主題上之平均公告日落差，並區分為三類：並行發展、美國領先和全球領先。第一類“並行發展”定義為在科技發展時間落差上，全球與美國之科技前沿(Technology Front)無任何落差，含有「自動價差交易」、「電力線通訊系統」與「隨建即連RSI網路」等主題；第二類“美國領先”定義為在科技發展時間落差上，美國領先全球，尤以「在多伺服器下的動態用電與負荷管理」這個主題時間落差最大，美國(2006年4月)領先全球(2006年8月)四個月；而第三類“全球領先”則定義為在科技發展時間落差上，全球領先美國，尤以「電子交易資訊」這個主題時間落差最大，全球(2005年1月)領先美國(2004年4月)九個月。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study aims to compare the gap of technology fronts between the United States (U.S.) and the global nations in the smart grid field. Highly cited patents were collected from 2001/01/01 to 2010/12/31 and then were analyzed through bibliographic coupling (B.C.) method, sliding citation window, and Girvan-Newman clustering for being converted into a global technology trajectory map as well as a U.S. one. Results show that the temporal relationship between a global and a U.S trajectory can be classified into three types based on the average issue date of a technology front: parallel development, U.S. frontrunner and global frontrunner. “Parallel development” defines as the technology development is the same both in the U.S. and the global nations which covers the “Automatic Spread Trading”, “Power Line Communication System”, “Ad hoc RSI Network” and etc.. “U.S. frontrunner” defines as the technology development of the U.S. is faster than the other global nations including the topic of “Dynamic Power and Workload Management for Multi-server” where the U.S. (April, 2006) emerged earlier for four months than the global (August, 2006). “Global frontrunner” defines as the technology development of the global nations is faster than the U.S. containing the topic of “Electronic Auction Information” in which the global (April, 2004) emerged earlier for nine months than the U.S. (January, 2005). | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T04:30:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R97546039-1.pdf: 3127054 bytes, checksum: 2399d2c41512c26793b9009fa8ae6b52 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
中文摘要 ii Abstract iii List of Figures vi List of Tables viii Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background of Research 1 1.2 Motivation and Objective of Research 4 Chapter 2 Literature Review 5 2.1 Front Formation 5 2.2 Trajectory Formation 8 2.3 Front Studies 10 2.4 Trajectory Studies 14 Chapter 3 Methodology 16 3.1 Selection of High-impact Patents 16 3.2 Sliding Window 17 3.3 Selection of the B.C. Pairs 18 3.4 Front Detection 22 3.5 Selection of Dominant Fronts 23 3.6 Presentation of Front Continuity 24 3.7 Feature Extraction of Fronts 25 3.8 Comparison of Trajectories 26 3.9 Comparison of Fronts between Trajectories. 27 Chapter 4 Front and Trajectory Formation 29 4.1 Case Profile 29 4.2 Selection of High-impact Patents 30 4.3 Sliding Window 31 4.4 Selection of the B.C. Pairs 32 4.5 Front Detection 33 4.6 Selection of Dominant Fronts 34 Chapter 5 Trajectory Comparison Analysis between Global and the U.S. 37 5.1 Overview of Trajectories 37 5.2 Jaccard Similarity Index of Global and the U.S Trajectories. 39 5.3 Three Types of Relationship between Global and the U.S. Trajectories 40 5.4 Overview of Fronts 42 5.5 Jaccard Similarity Index of Global and the U.S. Fronts 45 5.6 Front Gap between Global and the U.S. 47 Chapter 6 Conclusion and Future Work 55 6.1 Conclusion 55 6.2 Future Work 57 References 58 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 技術軌跡發展之時間落差探討：以全球與美國智慧電網領域之專利為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Identifying Time Gap by Positioning Global and the U.S. Technology Trajectories in the Smart Grid Technology | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 黃慕萱 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林正平 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 專利分析,書目耦合,技術前沿,技術軌跡,時間落差,智慧電網, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Patent analysis,bibliographic coupling,technology front,technology trajectory,temporal gap,smart grid, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 64 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2011-07-27 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 工業工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 工業工程學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-100-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.05 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。