Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 園藝暨景觀學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/32817
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor林晏州(Yann-Jou Lin)
dc.contributor.authorWong-Lin Wangen
dc.contributor.author王皖麟zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-13T04:16:18Z-
dc.date.available2007-07-31
dc.date.copyright2006-07-31
dc.date.issued2005
dc.date.submitted2006-07-25
dc.identifier.citation1. 太魯閣國家公園管理處,(2002),太魯閣國家公園計畫第二次通盤檢討,花蓮:內政部營建署太魯閣國家公園管理處。
2. 林晏州,(1984),區域性戶外遊憩資源規劃方法之研究-兼論台灣地區遊憩資源開發策略,都市計畫,11,1-18。
3. 林晏州,(1988),社會心理遊憩容許量之研究,東海學報,29(2),819-846。
4. 林晏州,(2000),社會遊憩容許量評估方法之比較,戶外遊憩研究,13(1),1-20。
5. 邱皓政,(2003),量化研究與統計分析,台北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
6. 陳沛悌、林晏州,(1997),秀姑巒溪泛舟活動社會心理容許量之探討,戶外遊憩研究,10(3),19-36。
7. 太魯閣國家公園網站,(2006),http://www.taroko.gov.tw/。
8. Beard, J. G. & Raghed, M. G. (1980). Measuring leisure satisfaction. Journal of Leisure Research, 12(1), 20-33.
9. Graefe, A. R., Vaske, J. J. & Kuss, F. R. (1984). Social carrying capacity: an integration and synthesis of twenty years of research. Leisure Sciences, 6, 395-432.
10. Hall, T. & Shelby, B. (1996). Who cares about encounters? Difference between those with and without norms. Leisure Sciences, 18, 7-22.
11. Hendee, J. C. (1974). A multiple-satisfaction approach to game management. Wildlife Society Bulletin. 2(3), 104-113.
12. Hendee, J. C. & Stankey, G. H., Lucas, R. C. (1978). Wilderness management. USDA Forest Service Miscellaneous Publication No. 1365, 381pp.
13. Heywood, J. L., Manning, R. E., & Vaske, J. J. (2002). Normative research in outdoor recreation: progress and prospects for continued development and applications. Leisure Sciences, 24, 251-253.
14. Lawson, S. R. & Manning, R. E. (2001). Solitude versus access: a study of tradeoffs in outdoor recreation using indifference curve analysis. Leisure Sciences, 23, 179-191.
15. Lawson, S. R. & Manning, R. E. (2002). Tradeoffs among social, resource, and management attributes of the Denali wilderness experience: a contextual approach to normative research. Leisure Sciences, 24, 297-312.
16. Lime, D. W. & Stankey, G. H. (1971). Carrying capacity: maintaining outdoor recreation quality. Forest Recreation Symposium Proceedings. (pp. 174-184). Northeast Forest Experiment Station, Upper Darby, Pennsylvania.
17. Manfredo, M. J. & Driver, B. L., Brown, P. J. (1983). A test of concepts inherent in experience based setting management for outdoor recreation areas. Journal of Leisure Research, 15(3), 263-283.
18. Manning, R. E. (2003). What to do about crowding and solitude in parks and wilderness? a reply to Stewart and Cole. Journal of Leisure Research, 35(1), 107-118.
19. Manning, R. E., Lime, D. W., Freimund, W. A. & Pitt, D. G. (1996). Crowding norms at frontcountry sites: a visual approach to setting standards of quality. Leisure Sciences, 18, 39-59.
20. Manning, R. E., Newman, P., Valliere, W. A., Wang, B. & Lawson, S. R. (2001). Respondent self-assessment of research on crowding norms in outdoor recreation. Journal of Leisure Research, 33(3), 251-271.
21. Manning, R. E., Valliere, W. A. & Jacobi, C. (1999). Crowding norms: alternative measurement approaches. Leisure Sciences, 21, 97-115.
22. Manning, R., Wang, B., Valliere, W., Lawson, S. & Newman, P. (2002). Research to estimate and manage carrying capacity of a tourist attraction: a study of Alcatraz Island. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 10(5), 388-404.
23. Needham, M. D. & Rollins, R. B. (2005). Interest group standards for recreation and tourism impacts at ski areas in the summer. Tourism Management, 26(1), 1-13.
24. Needham, M. D., Rollins, R. B. & Wood, C. J. B. (2004). Site-specific encounters, norms and crowding of summer vistors at Alpine ski area. Journal of Tourism research, 6, 421-437.
25. Papageorgiou, K. & Brotherton , I. (1999). A management planning framework based on ecological, perceptual and economic carrying capacity: The case study of Vikos-Aoos National Park, Greece. Journal of Environmental Management, 56, 271–284.
26. Prato, T. (2001). Modeling carrying capacity for national parks. Ecological Economics, 39, 321-331.
27. Schreyer, R. & Roggenbuck, J. W. (1978). The influence of experience expectations on crowding perceptions and social psychological carrying capacities. Leisure Sciences, 1(3), 373-394.
28. Shelby, B. & Heberlein, T. A. (1986). Carrying capacity in recreation settings. Corvallis, Oregon: Oregon State University Press, 164pp.
29. Shelby, B. & Vaske, J. J. (1991). Using normative data to develop evaluative standards for resource management: a comment on three recent papers. Journal of Leisure Research, 23, 173-187.
30. Stankey, G. H. & McCool, S. F. (1984). Carrying capacity in recreation settings: evolution, appraisal, and application. Leisure Sciences, 6, 453-473.
31. Stewart, W. P., Cole, D. N. (2001). Number of encounters and experience quality in Grand Canyon backcountry: consistently negative and weak relationships. Journal of Leisure Research, 33(1), 106-120.
32. Vaske, J. J. & Donnelly, M. P. (2002). Generalizing the encounter-norm-crowding relationship. Leisure Sciences, 24, 255-269.
33. Wagar, J. A. (1974). Recreational carrying capacity reconsidered. Journal of Forestry, 72(5), 274-278.
34. Whisman, S. A. & Hollenhorst, S. J. (1998). A path model of Whitewater boating satifaction on the Cheat river of west Virgnia. Environmental Management, 22(1), 109-117.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/32817-
dc.description.abstract合歡山地區為國內少數能夠提供遊客賞雪機會之旅遊據點,每當雪季往往擁入大量人潮,對遊客遊憩體驗品質造成衝擊。本研究之主要目的為探討合歡山雪季遊憩使用量對遊客擁擠感受之影響情形,以評估合歡山雪季期間之社會心理容許量。研究中將擁擠感分為進入區內時之交通擁擠感受、使用停車設施時之擁擠感受、對當下遇見人數之擁擠感受及使用公共廁所時之擁擠感受四個方面進行探討,分別建立全區遊憩使用量與遊客擁擠感受之函數關係,並與經營管理者進行訪談以決定評估標準,最後提出合歡山地區經營管理之參考使用量。研究結果顯示,雪季期間每半小時約可開放263輛車進出合歡山地區,而區內總車輛應維持在350輛車左右,建議經營管理單位可採用車輛管制方式控制合歡山地區之遊憩使用量。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe Hehuan Mountains area is one of the few snow-scenic spots in Taiwan, and it provides the opportunity for visitors to experience the snow scene. However, it would impact on visitors’ experience quality when visitors crowd this area. The main purpose of this study was to examine the effects of the recreational use level on the perceived crowding of visitors, and evaluate the social psychological carrying capacity during the snow season in Hehuan Mountains area. First, this study divided the perceived crowding into five categories, including the traffic, parking facilities, the amount of visitors nearby, and using public toilets. Second, this study set up the mathematic relationship between the recreational use level in the whole area and the perceived crowding of visitors. Third, this study interviewed the administrators to determine the standards of quality. Finally, this study suggested the reference capacity for Hehuan Mountains area. The result of this study shows that the flow of vehicles should be limited to 263 cars in every half an hour during the snow season, while the total vehicles in the area should be restrained under about 350 cars. We suggest the managers use traffic control to restrict the recreational use in Hehuan Mountains area.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T04:16:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-94-R92628314-1.pdf: 810081 bytes, checksum: 997ed0860fb58ef72d49c2dae636c562 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2005
en
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究緣起與目的 1
第二節 研究內容與步驟 2
第二章 文獻回顧 5
第一節 遊憩容許量 5
一、遊憩容許量之概念與定義 5
二、遊憩容許量之分類 8
三、遊憩容許量的評估架構 10
四、社會心理容許量探討之議題 12
第二節 遊憩體驗品質 17
一、遊憩體驗品質的定義 17
二、遊憩體驗品質的測量方法 17
第三節 常模理論 21
一、常模之定義及應用 21
二、社會常模之相關研究 23
第三章 研究方法 27
第一節 研究架構 27
第二節 研究地點分析 29
一、合歡山地區整體環境分析 29
二、合歡山地區遊憩區現況分析 30
第三節 合歡山雪季相關資訊 34
第四節 研究變項與操作定義 36
一、遊憩使用量 36
二、遊客擁擠感受 38
三、經營管理者可接受之衝擊程度 41
四、遊客個人特性與遊憩特性 42
第五節 資料處理與分析方法 43
第四章 研究結果與討論 45
第一節 問卷回收情形 45
第二節 受訪者個人特性分析 46
第三節 受訪者遊憩特性分析 48
第四節 遊憩使用量分析 51
一、各據點車輛進出及區內總車輛數之變化情形 51
二、區內總人數之變化情形 58
第五節 遊憩使用量與擁擠感受之關係 61
一、進出車輛總數與進入區內時之交通擁擠感受之關係 66
二、區內總車輛數與遊客使用停車設施擁擠感受之關係 68
三、區內總人數與遊客對當下遇見人數擁擠感受之關係 69
四、區內總人數與使用公共廁所擁擠感受之關係 71
第六節 合歡山地區雪季社會心理容許量之評估 73
第五章 結論與建議 79
第一節 結論 79
第二節 建議 82
一、合歡山地區經營管理之建議 82
二、後續研究建議 84
參考文獻 86
附錄一 合歡山雪季遊客調查問卷 90
附錄二 經營管理者訪談調查表 92
附錄三 各調查日時段內車輛進出計數調查結果 93
附錄四 區內總車輛數量統計結果 103
附錄五 經營管理者訪談調查摘要 106
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject太魯閣國家公園zh_TW
dc.subject遊憩容許量zh_TW
dc.subject遊憩使用量zh_TW
dc.subject擁擠感受zh_TW
dc.subjectrecreational carrying capacityen
dc.subjectrecreational use levelen
dc.subjectTaroko National Parken
dc.subjectperceived crowdingen
dc.title太魯閣國家公園合歡山地區雪季遊憩容許量之評估zh_TW
dc.titleThe Evaluation of Recreational Carrying Capacity during the Snow Season in Hehuan Mountains Area of Taroko National Parken
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear94-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee黃文卿(Wen-Chin Huang),歐聖榮(Sheng-Jung Ou),張俊彥(Chun-Yen Chang),顏家芝(Jia-Jy Yen)
dc.subject.keyword遊憩容許量,遊憩使用量,擁擠感受,太魯閣國家公園,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordrecreational carrying capacity,recreational use level,perceived crowding,Taroko National Park,en
dc.relation.page110
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2006-07-25
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept園藝學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:園藝暨景觀學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-94-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
791.09 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved