請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/32297
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 馬鴻文(Hwong-Wen Ma) | |
dc.contributor.author | Ching-Wen Lu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 呂靜雯 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T03:41:22Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2006-07-31 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2006-07-31 | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2006-07-26 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Barker, A. and Wood, C., 2001. Environmental Assessment in the European Union: Perspectives, Past, Present and Strategic. European Planning Studies, Vol.9, No.2, pp.243-245.
2. Noble, B. F., 2003, A state-of-practice survey of policy, plan, and program assessment in Canadian provinces, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol.24, pp.351-361. 3. Brown, A. L. and Thérivel, R., 2000. Principles to Guide the Development of Strategic Environmental Assessment Methodology. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, Vol.18 (3), pp. 183-190 4. Chaker, A., El-Fadl, K., Chamas, L., Hatjian, B., 2006. A review of strategic environmental assessment in 12 selected countries, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol.26 (2), pp. 15-56. 5. Demidova, O. and Cherp, A., 2004. Risk assessment for improved treatment of health considerations in EIA, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol.25, pp.411-429. 6. DHV Environment and Infrastructcture BV, 1994. Existing Strategic Environmental Assessment Methodology, For European Commission DGXI, Brussels. 7. Finnveden, G. and Moberg, A., 2005. Environmental systems analysis tools – an overview, Journal of Cleaner Production Vol.13, pp1165-1173. 8. Finnveden, G., Nilsson M., Johansson, J., Persson, A., Moberg, A., Carlsson, T., 2003. Strategic environmental assessment methodologies-applications within the energy sector, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol.23, pp.91-133. 9. Hofstetter, P., 1998. Perspectives in Life Cycle Impact Assessment- A Structured Approach to Combine Models of the Technosphere, Ecosphere and Valuesphere, Kluwer Academic Publishers, USA. 10. Partidário, M.R., 2003. Strategic Environmental Assessment: Current practices, future demands and capacity-building needs. Course Notes. IAIA’03 Marrakech, Morocco. 11. Pottig, J. and Hauschild, M., 2006. A decade of method development to increase the environmental realism of LCIA, Int. J. LCA, Vol.11, No.1, pp.11-13. 12. Sadler, B. and Verheem, R., 1996. Strategic Environmental assessment status, challenges and future directions, Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment of the Netherlands, The Hague. 13. von Seht, H., 1999. Requirements of a comprehensive strategic environmental assessment system, Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol.45, pp.1-14. 14. Sheate, W., Richardson, J., Aschemann, R., Palerm, J., Stephen, U., 2001. SEA and Integration of the Environmrnt into Strategic Decision Marking, Final Report to the European Commission, London. 15. Thérivel, R. and Partidário, M.R., 1996. Introduction, In: The Practice of Strategic Environmental Assessment, Edited by Thérivel, R., Partidário, M.R., Earthscan Publications, London. 16. Tukker, A., 1999,Life cycle assessment as a tool in environment as a tool in environmental impact assessment, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, pp.435-456. 17. Vanderhaegen, M. and Muro, E., 2004. Contribution of a European spatial data infrastructure to the effectiveness of EIA and SEA studies, Environmental Impact assessment Review, Vol.25, pp.123-142. 18. Wood, C. and Djeddour, M., 1992. Srategic Environmental Assessment: EA of policies and programmes, Impact Assessment Bulletin, Vol.10, No.1, pp.3-22. 19. NAS-NRC, 1983. Risk assessment in the federal government: managing the process, NAS-NRC Committee on the Institutional Means for Assessment of Risks to Public Health, National Academy Press, Washington, DC 20. Guinee, J. B. Heijungs, Udo de Haes, H. A., and Huppes, G., 1993. Quantitative life cycle assessment of products 2. Classification, valuation and improvement analysis, Journal of Cleaner Production, 1(2), 81-91. 21. Hertwich, E. G., T. E. McKone and W. S. Pease., 2000. A Systematic Uncertainty Analysis of an Evaluative Fate Exposure Model, Risk Analysis, 20 (4), 437-452. 22. Chao,C.W., Ma, H.W., Hung, M.L., Lu,C.W., 2006. Integrating dispersion model and population factors to develop a novel toxicity impact assessment method of LCIA, submitted to The 7th International Conference on EcoBalance. 1. 於幼華,2005,我國政策環評制度之檢討與展望,政府政策環境影響評估研習會,行政院環保署主辦。 2. 陳家豪、馬鴻文、郭乃文,2004,生命週期衝擊評估之本土化-與風險評估之結合(III),國科會補助專題研究計畫。 3. 陳聯平,2004,十年回顧 : 台灣地區垃圾焚化爐營建實錄,環保署。 4. 劉宗勇,2005,現行政策環評作業辦法與作業規範解析,政府政策環境影響評估研習會,行政院環保署主辦。 5. 環保署,2004,我國廢棄物處理之檢討與評估報告。 6. 中國國家標準,1997,環境管理 - 生命週期評估 -原則與架構,經濟部中央標準局印行。 7. 中國國家標準,2001,環境管理 - 生命週期評估 - 生命週期衝擊評估,經濟部中央標準局印行。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/32297 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 我國政府政策環境影響評估制度雖為完整法令體系,然而國內現行評估制度流程與方法、作業內容與實質評估工具,不甚清晰,相關機關執行難度高,無法對政策的內涵作出具體評析。具體量化的評估方法與技術為國內政策環評迫切需要發展之重大課題。
針對政策環評衝擊分析階段,將科學化的量化評估工具應用於政策環評當中,提供客觀具體的環境衝擊資訊。本研究以「一般廢棄物跨區焚化處理」政策環評為案例。依據政策環評程序,於政策環評衝擊分析階段,針對量化評估工具進行研究。 首先採用傳統生命週期評估作為工具,評估「一般廢棄物跨區焚化處理」各政策環境衝擊。並且對於生命週期評估方法應用於政策環評的缺失進行改善。探討風險評估概念結合於生命週期評估,應用至生命週期衝擊評估的人體毒性衝擊類別,解決傳統場址一致性生命週期評估中未考量排放源因地區差異性而產生不同人體毒性衝擊潛勢的缺失。 最後將說明如何將生命週期衝擊評估特徵化結果,按照政策環評評估項目與內容分類,填入生命週期評估特徵化結果於政策環評之矩陣表當中。達到科學方法量化環境衝擊、評估直接與間接的環境衝擊的目的。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In Taiwan the development of strategic environmental assessment (SEA) is on initial stage. There are a few finished cases for SEA, and most of them use qualitative analysis to estimate environmental impact. A qualitative method results in a subjective decision, so it is necessary to establish a quantitative tool in the procedure of SEA in Taiwan.
A framework for SEA tested in a case study on a regional waste management includes the test of developing quantitative method such as traditional life cycle assessment (LCA) for impact assessment in SEA and site-dependent human toxic potential (sd-HTP) for human health in life cycle impact assessment (LCIA). Because of the lack of site-dependent information in traditional LCA method, adding sd-HTP will increase the accuracy of the model. The results of LCA indicate that the electric recycle in the incinerating process reduces environmental impact, and sd-HTP with local geography and exposure parameters affects numerous differences from traditional LCIA in human health category. In the end, integrating the LCA results into matrix is a proper way at present to establish a quantitative tool in the procedure of SEA. However the results of LCA can not cover all relevant types of environmental impacts. Therefore it would be useful to complement a traditional LCA with a structured qualitative approach in order to take into account all of the matrix items. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T03:41:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-95-R93541208-1.pdf: 861975 bytes, checksum: 575315f27d5476849160c92a09bb5155 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 前言
1-1 研究緣起………………………………………………………1 1-2 研究目的與架構………………………………………………2 第二章 文獻回顧 2-1 政府政策環境影響評估 2-1-1 發展與定義…………………………………………………4 2-1-2 功能與限制…………………………………………………5 2-1-3 政策環評與個案型環境影響評估之異同…………………6 2-1-4 架構…………………………………………………………7 2-2 政策環評之評估方法 2-2-1 政策環評之評估方法介紹…………………………………11 2-2-2 我國政策環評評估方法……………………………………13 2-3 生命週期評估於政策環評之應用 2-3-1 生命週期評估簡介…………………………………………17 2-3-2 生命週期評估的空間特性…………………………………19 2-3-3 生命週期評估應用於政策環評……………………………20 2-4 風險評估於政策環評之應用 2-4-1 風險評估之簡介……………………………………………22 2-4-2 風險評估應用於環境影響評估……………………………22 2-5 小結……………………………………………………………24 第三章 研究方法 3-1 案例說明 3-1-1 政策背景……………………………………………………27 3-1-2 政策說明……………………………………………………29 3-1-3 情境推估……………………………………………………30 3-1-4 方案規劃……………………………………………………31 3-2 生命週期評估 3-2-1 目的與範疇界定……………………………………………40 3-2-2 盤查分析……………………………………………………41 3-2-3 生命週期衝擊評估…………………………………………44 3-3 場址相關性人體毒性潛勢 3-3-1 人體毒性潛勢………………………………………………49 3-3-2 場址相關性人體毒性潛勢…………………………………50 3-3-3 場址相關性人體毒性潛勢方法建構………………………51 3-3 生命週期評估結果應用於政策環評…………………………57 第四章 結果與討論 4-1 生命週期評估 4-1-1 盤查結果……………………………………………………58 4-1-2 衝擊評估結果………………………………………………70 4-2 場址相關性人體毒性潛勢……………………………………76 4-3 比較與討論 4-3-1 各方案排序比較……………………………………………77 4-3-2 各階段環境衝擊貢獻度比較………………………………78 4-3-3 不同人體毒性潛勢評估方法比較…………………………81 4-4 生命週期評估結果應用於政策環評…………………………85 第五章 結論與建議 5-1 結論……………………………………………………………88 5-2 建議……………………………………………………………89 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 生命週期評估結合風險評估應用於政策環評以一般廢棄物跨區焚化處理為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Integrating Life Cycle Assessment and Risk Assessment with Strategic Environmental Assessment for Regional Waste Management | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 94-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 於幼華(Yue-Hwa Yu),林素貞(Sue-Jane Lin) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 政策環評,生命週期評估,風險評估,場址相關性人體毒性潛勢,人體毒性潛勢, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Strategic Environmental Assessment,Life Cycle Assessment,Risk Assessment,site-dependent Human Toxic Potential,Human Toxic Potential, | en |
dc.relation.page | 102 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2006-07-26 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 環境工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 環境工程學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-95-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 841.77 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。