請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/32244完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 雷庚玲 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chi-Shan Wu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 吳季珊 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T03:38:37Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2006-08-01 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2006-08-01 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2006-07-25 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 行政院衛生署統計資料（2003）。行政院衛生署統計網（http://www.doh.gov.tw）。
邱一峰（1996）。「國中生憂鬱傾向及其相關因素之研究；性別、年級、家庭狀況、鬱卒、憂鬱與尋求幫助、自殺傾向之關係」（未發表之碩士論文）。台北：[國立政治大學教育研究所]。 柯慧貞、廖聆岑、林美芳（2003）。「南區大專校院學生憂鬱與自殺之現況與其成因分析」。南區大專院校學務長諮詢會議─憂鬱與自殺研討會之口頭報告論文。 財團法人董氏基金會（2005）。財團法人董氏基金會網站（http://www.jtf.org.tw/psyche/melancholia/research.asp）。 曾慧芸、雷庚玲（2005）。「學業失敗情境中負向言語對兒童自我效能及關係品質之影響來源：施話角色抑或話語內容？」。未發表之論文手稿。 Baker, S. L., & Kirsch, I. (1991). Cognitive mediators of pain perception and tolerance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 504-510. Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1995). Personal narratives about guilt: Role in action control and interpersonal relationships. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 17, 173-198. Cheng, Y.-P., Lay, K.-L., & Tseng, H.-Y. (2005). Is “industry” an essence of morality among Chinese adolescents? Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Chien, C., & Cheng, T. (1985). Depression in Taiwan: Epidemiological survey utilizing CES-D. Psychiatria et Neurologia Japonica, 87, 335-338. Cole, D. A. (1989). Psychopathology of adolescent suicide：Hopelessness, coping beliefs and depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 98, 248-255. Derogatis, L. R. (1977). The SCL-90R manual I: Scoring, administration and procedure for the SCL-90R. Clinical Psychometric Research. Baltimore. Derogatis, L. R. (1983). SCL-90-R: Administration, scoring, and procedures manual. Clinical Psychometric Research. Baltimore. Diner, C. I., & Dweck, C. S. (1978). An analysis of learned helplessness: Continuous change in performance, strategy, and achievement cognition following failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 451-461. Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press. Dweck, C. S. (2002). The development of ability concepts. In A. Wigfiled & J. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation. A volume in the educational psychology series (pp. 57-88). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995a). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267-285. Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995b). Implicit theories: Elaboration and extension of the model. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 322-333. Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273. Dweck, C. S., & Sorich, L. A. (1999). Mastery-oriented thinking. In C. R. Snyder (Ed.), Coping: The psychology of what works (pp. 232-251). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Ferrari, J. R. (1991). Compulsive procrastination: Some self-reported characteristics. Psychological Reports, 68, 455-458. Flett, G. L., Blankstein, K. R., & Martin, T. R. (1995). Procrastination, negative self-evaluation, and stress in depression and anxiety: A review and preliminary model. In Ferrari, J. R., Johnson, J. L., McCown, W. G. (Eds.), Procrastination and task avoidance: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 137-167). New York : Plenum Press. Garber, A., & Flynn, C. (2001).Predictors of depressive cognitions in young adolescents. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 25, 353-376. Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2001). Cross-cultural response to failure: Considering outcome attributions with different goals. In F. Salili, Chiu, C. & Hong, Y. (Eds.), Student motivation: The culture and context of learning (pp. 203-219). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers. Hareli, S., & Weiner, B. (2002). Social emotions and personality inferences: A scaffold for a new direction in the study of achievement motivation. Educational Psychologist, 37, 183-193. Hong, Y., Chiu, C., Dweck, C. S., Lin, D. M., & Wan, W. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 588-599. Kamins, M. L., & Dweck, C. S. (1999). Person versus process praise and criticism: Implications for contingent self-worth and coping. Developmental Psychology, 35, 835-847. Kaplan, A., Middleton, M. J., Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2002). Achievement goals and goal structures. In C. Midgley (Ed.), Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning (pp. 21-53). Mahwah, NJ: LEA Press. Kenny, D. A. (1975). A quasi-experimental approach to assessing treatment effects in the nonequivalent control group design. Psychological Bulletin. 82, 345-362. Kenny, D. A. (1979). Correlation and causality. New York: Wiley & Sons. Koestner, R., Zuckerman, M., & Koestner, J. (1987). Praise, involvement, and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 383-390. Lay, K.-L., & Tsai, Y.-M. (2005). Moral, pragmatic, and entity concepts of academic effort among Chinese adolescents: A developmental perspective. In Keng-Ling Lay (Chair), Reconsidering the effects of entity and incremental feedbacks in academic situations: Findings from a Chinese population. Symposium conducted at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Atlanta, GA, USA. Lay, K.-L., & Tseng, H.-Y. (2003). The effect of verbal disciplines in the contest of school failure: Relationship-specific or content-specific? Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Tampa, Florida, USA. Lee, P.-C., Wu C.-S., & Lay, K.-L. (2005). Praising ability is not worse but even better than praising effort: Two replications of Mueller & Dweck (1998) on Chinese Children. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Li, J. (2002). Learning models in different cultures. In J. Bempechat & J. G. Elliot (Eds.), Learning in culture and context: Approaching the complexities of achievement motivation in student learning (pp. 45-63). San Francisco, CA: Wiley Periodicals. Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. E. (1990). Control or defense? Depression and the sense of control over good and bad outcomes. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 31, 71-86. Mueller, M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 33-52. Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328-346. Nicholls, J. G. (1990). What is ability and why are we mindful of it? A developmental perspective. In R. Sternberg & J. Kolligian (Eds.), Competence considered (pp. 11-40). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Njus, D. M., & Brockway, J. H.(1999). Perceptions of competence and locus of control for positive and negative outcomes: Predicting depression and adjustment to college. Personality and Individual Differences. 26 , 531-548. Rodin, J. (1986). Health, control, and aging. In M. M. Baltes & R. P. Baltes (Eds.), The psychology of control and aging. Hillsdale, NJ: Erbaum. Schunk, D. H. (1983). Ability versus effort attributional feedback: Differential effects on self-efficacy and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 848-856. Schunk, D. H. (1984). Sequential attributional feedback and children’s achievement behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1159-1169. Stevenson, H. W. (1985). Cognitive performance and academic achievement of Japanese, Chinese, and American children. Child Development. 56, 718-734. Stevenson, H. W., Lee, S., Chen, C., Stigler, J., Hsu, C. C., & Kitamura, S. (1990). Contexts of achievement: A study of American, Chinese, and Japanese. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 55, 1-2. Tsai, Y.-M., & Lay, K.-L. (2005). Do Chinese adolescents fit into an ability-driven Western framework of achievement motivation? A developmental perspective. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Tseng, H.-Y., & Lay, K.-L. (2005). Are Incremental theorists always more adaptive? the effect of effort feedback on self-liking among Chinese adolescents. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Tweed, R. G., & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Learning considered within a cultural context: Confucian and Socratic approaches. American Psychologist, 57, 89-99. Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2001). Academic self-handicapping: What we know, what more there is to learn. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 115-138. Urdan, T., Ryan, A. M., Anderson, E. M., & Gheen, M. H. (2002). Goals, goal structures, and avoidance behaviors. In C. Midgley (Ed.), Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning (pp. 55-83). Mahwah, NJ: LEA Press. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/32244 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 近年以台灣學生為樣本的研究發現，華人學生的學習動機模式明顯和西方理論不同。Lay與Tsai（2005）更進一步提出「努力本質觀」的概念，以預測華人青少年的學習行為與歸因。本研究的五個實驗即為探討努力本質觀對華人青少年不適應的學習行為及憂鬱情緒之預測力。實驗一以149名台大學生為樣本，發現在排除了西方學習動機理論中之內隱理論、成就目標等變項後，努力本質觀仍能顯著預測台大學生之自我設限及拖延閒混等不適應的學習行為。實驗二以105名台大學生為樣本，加入憂鬱測量工具CES-D為依變項，發現在排除西方成就動機變項後，努力本質觀仍能顯著預測受試者之拖延閒混以及憂鬱傾向。實驗三為了避免樣本偏差，因此以台大學生94名及一所台北近郊私立大學學生140名為樣本，以階層廻歸分析先控制智力內隱理論後，發現努力本質觀對憂鬱分數的正向預測力仍達顯著。為確立努力本質與憂鬱之序列關係，實驗四以跨期中考前後兩階段之前瞻性研究探討113名台大學生之考前努力本質分數對考後憂鬱分數之預測力。結果發現努力本質觀與憂鬱分數相關之方向性較有可能來自於努力本質觀對憂鬱的影響。另外，共變數分析的結果發現高努力本質觀與低努力本質觀者在失敗前後憂鬱分數的改變趨向有顯著差異。實驗五以國中生127名、明星學校高中生155人、一般高中生142名為樣本，再次進行跨兩階段之前瞻性研究。只有明星高中組二因子共變數分析之交互作用顯著，與實驗四之結果相符。由以上一系列研究結果可見，持高努力本質觀之華人大學生不但較容易產生不適應的學習行為，也較會產生憂鬱情緒。而且，在遭受學業挫折後，努力本質觀有引發憂鬱的傾向。由於本研究僅發現大學生及明星高中的學生有此傾向，努力本質觀是否為針對功課好的華人學生之憂鬱危險因子，是未來研究值得探討的問題。
關鍵詞：成就目標、學習動機、智力本質觀、努力本質觀、自我設限、憂鬱。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The entity view of effort is referred to the concept that the utmost effort of each individual can make is unchangeable. The individual differences of entity view of effort are most likely to manifest in achievement motivation toward challenging events. Lay and Tsai (2005) indicated that, after controlling for the entity view of intelligence (Dweck & Leggett, 1988) and achievement goal orientation, entity view of effort still posts a unique contribution to post-failure attribution, self-handicapping and procrastination behaviors of middle school students in Taiwan. The goal of the present research is to demonstrate that the entity view of effort is a maladaptive belief that is related not only to maladjusted learning behaviors but also to depressive emotions among Chinese adolescents. In addition, cross-lagged panel design is applied to test if the entity view of effort is an antecedent variable of depression.
A total of 348 students from the National Taiwan University and 140 students from a private university near Taipei participated in Study 1, 2, and 3. Hierarchical regression analyses repetitively revealed a unique contribution of the entity view of effort to self-handicapping and procrastination behaviors as well as depression after controlling for the contribution of the entity view of intelligence in college students. Study 4 applied a two-stage prospective design. A total of 113 college students completed the entity view of effort questionnaire and the depression subscale of SCL90-R both before and after a midterm examination. The Pearson-Filon statistic in the cross-lagged panel design indicated that the entity view of effort is a marginally significant predictor of depressive emotion upon facing a challenging event. To partial out a confounding variable that those having succeeded and failed in the midterm examination may consequently have different level of depressive mood, a 2 (high vs. low entity view of effort) x 2 (pretest vs. posttest) ANCOVA with school performance as the covariate was performed specifically to all the subjects who had failed on the midterm examination. The interaction effect was found significant. The level of depression increased after the challenging event for students with high effort-entity view but decreased for those with low effort-entity view. Study 5 replicated the procedure of Study 4 just that subjects were middle school students. The three groups of subjects in Study 5 included the 8th Grade group (n=127), the 11th Grade A group (n=155), and the 11th Grade B group (n=142). Students in the 11th Grade A group are academically more advanced than those in the B group according to a nation-wide high school entrance examination. No significant predicting power of the effort-entity view to depression was found in either the 8th Grade group or the 11th Grade B group. However, similar to the results of Study 4, the same pattern of significant interaction effect of ANCOVA was found in the 11th Grade A group. Combining the results of Study 4 and 5, it seems that depressive mood after failure is predictable from the degree of effort-entity view only for students with high academic performance. In other words, this finding may imply that the entity view of effort is a risk factor to high performers upon confronting challenging events. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T03:38:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-95-R91227011-1.pdf: 694324 bytes, checksum: 8abccb58d0daf3ddc0d780ec002228e6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 緒論………………………………………………………………… 1
前言………………………………………………………………… 1 西方成就動機模式中的行為組型與歸因………………………… 2 智力內隱理論……………………………………………………… 4 「努力」回饋對西方學童與華人學童的效果…………………… 5 華人的努力概念…………………………………………………… 8 努力本質觀………………………………………………………… 9 本研究之目的……………………………………………………… 12 實驗一……………………………………………………………… 14 實驗一方法………………………………………………………… 14 實驗一結果與討論………………………………………………… 17 實驗二……………………………………………………………… 21 實驗二方法………………………………………………………… 21 實驗二結果與討論………………………………………………… 22 實驗三……………………………………………………………… 30 實驗三方法………………………………………………………… 30 實驗三結果與討論………………………………………………… 32 實驗四……………………………………………………………… 35 實驗四方法………………………………………………………… 35 實驗四結果與討論………………………………………………… 38 實驗五……………………………………………………………… 44 實驗五方法………………………………………………………… 45 實驗五結果與討論………………………………………………… 48 綜合討論…………………………………………………………… 56 研究限制與未來發展……………………………………………… 61 參考文獻…………………………………………………………… 64 附錄………………………………………………………………… 69 附錄一 邀請學校協助研究邀請函（國中版）………… 69 附錄二 致實驗班級導師說明函（國中版）…………… 71 附錄三 實驗一問卷之題目……………………………… 72 附錄四 實驗二問卷……………………………………… 74 附錄五 實驗四前測問卷………………………………… 81 附錄六 實驗五前測問卷………………………………… 85 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 學習動機 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 成就目標 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 智力本質觀 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 努力本質觀 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 自我設限 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 憂鬱 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | learning motivation | en |
| dc.subject | depression | en |
| dc.subject | self-handicapping | en |
| dc.subject | entity view of effort | en |
| dc.subject | entity view of ability | en |
| dc.title | 努力本質觀對華人青少年憂鬱情緒之預測力 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The “entity view of effort“ as a predictor to depression among Chinese adolescents | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 94-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蔣治邦,陳淑惠 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 成就目標,學習動機,智力本質觀,努力本質觀,自我設限,憂鬱, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | learning motivation,entity view of ability,entity view of effort,self-handicapping,depression, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 88 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2006-07-27 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-95-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 678.05 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。