請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/32169
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 姚宗珍 | |
dc.contributor.author | Chi-Ying Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃繼瑩 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T03:34:53Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2008-08-03 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2006-08-03 | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2006-07-27 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1.Angel P, Karin M. Specific members of the Jun protein family regulate collagenase expression in response to various extracellular stimuli. in Birkedal-Hansen H, Werb Z, Welgus HG, Van Wart HE (eds): Matrix Metalloproteinases and Inhibitors. Gustav Fischer, p156-164, 1992
2.Ali AM, Sharawy MM. Enlargement of the rabbit mandibular condyle after experimental induction of anterior disc displacement: A histomorphometric study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53:544,1995 3.Baylis HA, Megson A, Hall R. Infection with Theileria annulata induces expression of matrix metalloproteinase 9 and transcription factor AP-1 in bovine leucocytes. Mole Biochem Parasitol 69: 211-222,1995 4.Blair HC, Zaidi M, Schlesinger PH. Mechanisms balancing skeletal matrix synthesis and degradation. Biochem J 364:329-341,2002 5.Blanco FJ, Guitian R, Vazquez-Martul E, de Toro FJ, Galdo F. Osteoarthritis chondrocytes die by apoptosis. Arthritis and Rheumatism 41(2):284-289,1998 6.Cascone P, Gennaro P, Spuntarelli G, Iannetti G. Mandibular distraction: Evolution of treatment protocols in hemifacial microsomy. J Craniofac Surg 16(4):563-571, 2005 7.Chang HH, Tseng H, Hsieh Thomas MH, Huang CY, Chen YH, Hsu CY, Cheng WM, Chen MH, Chen SR, Yao Jane CC. The effects of distraction osteogenesis on mandibular growth in growing minipigs: A report on three-dimensional morphologic changes. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:2014-2024,2005 8.Chen MH, Yao CC, Chang HH, Chen YJ. Chondrocyte apoptosis and structural changes of cartilage under biomechanical compression-a preliminary study. Chinese Dental Journal 24(2):107-113,2005 9.Codivilla A. On the means of lengthening in the lower limbs, the muscles, and tissues which are shortened through deformity. Am J Orthop Surg 2:353-369,1905 10.Colnot C, Thompson Z, Miclau T, Werb Z, Helms JA. Altered fracture repair in the absence of MMP9. Development 130(17):4123-4133,2003 11.Cope JA, Yamashita J, Healy S, et al. Force level and strain patterns during bilateral mandibular osteodistraction. J OralMaxillofac Surg 58:171-178,2000 12.Filanti C, Dickson GR, Di Martino D, et al. The expression of metalloproteinase-2, -9, and -14 and of tissue inhibitors-1 and -2 is developmentally modulated during osteogenesis in vitro, the mature osteoblastic phenotype expressing metalloproteinase-14. J Bone Miner Res 15(11): 2154-2168,2000 13.Fisher E, Staffenberg DA, McCarthy JG, et al. Histopathologic and biochemical changes in the muscles affected by distraction osteogenesis of the mandible. Plast Reconst Surg 99:366,1997 14.Fritz MA, Sidman JD. Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery 12:513-518,2004 15.Ganey TM, Blotch DW, Slater-Haase AS, et al. Evaluation of distraction osteogenesis by scanning electron microscopy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 111:265,1994 16.Gateno J, Teichgraeber JF, Aguilar E. Computer planning for distraction osteogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:873-882,2000 17.Gepstein A, Shapiro S, Arbel G, Lahat N, Livne E. Expression of matrix metalloproteinases in articular cartilage of temporomandibular and knee joints of mice during growth, maturation, and aging. Arthritis and Rheumatism 46(12):3240-3250,2002 18.Gepstein A, Arbel G, Blumenfeld I, Peled M, Livne E. Association of metalloproteinases, tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases, and proteoglycans with development, aging, and osteoarthritis processes in mouse temporomandibular joint. Histochem Cell Biol 120:23-32,2003 19.Glowacki J, Shusterman EM, Troulis M, Holmes R, Perrott D, Kaban LB. Distraction osteogenesis of the porcine mandible: Histomorphometric evaluation of bone. Plast Reconstr Surg 113(2):566-573,2004 20.Gosain AK. Distraction osteogenesis of the craniofacial skeleton. Plast Reconstr Surg 107(1):278-280,2001 21.Guerrero CA, Bell WH, Contasti GI, et al. Mandibular widening by intraoral distraction osteogenesis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35:383,1997 22.Guerrero CA, Bell WH, Contasti GI, Rodriguez AM. Intraoral mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Semin Orthod 5:35,1999 23.Harper RP, Bell WH, Hintan RJ. Reactive changes in the temporomandibular joint after mandibular midline osteodistraction. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35:20-25,1997 24.Hembry RM, Dyce J, Driesang I, Hunziker EB, Fosang AJ, Tyler JA, Murphy G. Immunolocalization of matrix metalloproteinases in partial-thickness defects in pig articular cartilage : a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg 83:826-838,2001 25.Herring SW, Decker JD, Liu ZJ, Ma T. Temporomandibular joint in miniature pigs: Anatomy, cell replication, and relation to loading. The Anatomical Record 266(3):152-166,2002 26.Hollier LH, Gosain A, Stelnicki E, et al. Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis. J Craniofac Surg 10:268,1999 27.Hu J, et al. Changes in the inferior alveolar nerve after mandibular lengthening with different rates of distraction. J of Oral Maxillofac Surgery 59(9):1041-1045,2001 28.Hyuga S, Nishikawa Y, Sakata K, Tanaka H, Yamagata S, Sugita K, Saga S, Matsuyama M, Shimizu S. Autocrine factor enhancing the secretion of M(r) 95,000 gelatinase (matrix metalloproteinase 9) in serum free medium conditioned with murine metastatic colon carcinoma cells. Cancer Res 54:3611-3616,1994 29.Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part I. The influence of stability of fixation and soft-tissue preservation. Clin Orthop 238: 249-281,1989 30.Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop 239:263-285,1989 31.Ilizarov GA. Clinical application of the tension stress effect for limb lengthening. Clin Orthop 250:8,1990 32.Kantomaa T, Pirttiniemi P. Changes in proteoglycan and collagen content in the mandibular condylar cartilage of the rabbit caused by an altered relationship between the condyle and glenoid fossa. European J Ortho 20:435-441,1998 33.Karaharju-Suvanto T, Peltonen J, Laitinen O, et al. The effect of gradual distraction on the mandible on the sheep temporomandibular joint. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 25:152,1996 34.Karp NS, McCarthy JG., Schreiber JS, et al. Membranous bone lengthening: A serial histological study. Ann Plast Surg 29:2-7,1992 35.Kevorkian L, Young DA, Darrah C, Donell ST, Shepstone L, Porter S, Brockbank SMV, Edwards DR, Parker AE, Clark IM. Expression profiling of metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in cartilage. Arthritis and Rheumatism 50(1):1314-1341,2004 36.Kewitt GF, Van Sickels JE. Long-term effect of mandibular midline distraction osteogenesis on the status of the temporomandibular joint, teeth, periodontal structures, and neurosensory function. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 7:1419-1425,1999 37.Kim SG, Park JC, Kang DW, Kim BO, Yoon JH, Cho SI, Choe HC, Bae SI. Correlation of immunohistochemical characteristics of the craniomandibular joint with the degree of mandibular lengthening in rabbits. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61:1189-1197,2003 38.Kim SG, Ha JW, Park JC. Histological changes in the temporomandibular joint in rabbits depending on the extent of mandibular lengthening by osteodistraction. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 42:559-65,2004 39.Kiviranta I, Juevelin J, Tammi M, et al. Weight bearing controls glycosaminoglycan concentration and articular cartilage thickness in the knee joints of young beagle dogs. Arthritis Rheum 30:801,1987 40.Kofod T, Cattaneo PM, Dalstra M, Melsen B. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the mandible and temporomandibular joint during vertical ramus elongation by distraction osteogenesis. J Craniofac Surg 16(4):586-593,2005 41.Koolstra JH, van Eijden TMGJ, Weijs WA, et al. A three-dimensional mathematical model of the human masticatory system predicting maximum possible bite forces. J Biomech 21:563-576,1988 42.Korioth TW, Hannam AG. Mandibular forces during simulated tooth clenching. J Orofac Pain 8:178-189,1994 43.Kruse-Lösler B, Meyer U, Flören C, Joos U. Influence of distraction rates on the temporomandibular joint position and cartilage morphology in a rabbit model of mandibular lengthening. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 59:1452-1459,2001 44.Kuboki T, Shinoda M, Orsini MG, Yamashita A. Viscoelastic properties of the pig temporomandibular joint articular soft tissues of the condyle and disc. J Dent Res 76(11): 1760-1769,1997 45.Lee DY, Choi IH, Chung CY, Chung PH, Chi JG, Suh YL.Effect of tibial lengthening on the gastrocnemius muscle: a histopathologic and morphometric study in rabbits. Acta Orthop Scand 64:688-692,1993 46.Livne E. Matrix synthesis in mandibular condylar cartilage of aging mice. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2:187-197,1994 47.Loening AM, James IE, Levenston ME, Badger AM, Frank EH, Kurz B, Nuttall ME, Hung HH, Blake SM, Grodzinsky AJ, Lark MW. Injurious mechanical compression of bovine articular cartilage induces chondrocyte apoptosis. Arch Biochem Biophys 381(2):205-212,2000 48.Makarov MR, Samchukov ML, Cope JB. The effect of gradual traction on peripheral nerves, in Craniofacial Distraction osteogenesis, M.L. Samchukov, J.B. Cope, and A.M. Cherkashin, Editors. Mosby, Taxas. p.89-101,2001 49.McCarthy JG, Schreider J, Karp N, Thorne CH, Grayson BH. Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 89:1-8,1992 50.McCarthy JG, Stelnicki EJ, Grayson BH. Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible: A ten-year experience. Semin Orthod 5: 3,1999 51.McCarthy JG, Stelnicki EJ, Mehrara BJ, Longaker MT. Distraction osteogenesis of the craniofacial Skeleton. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1812-1826,2001 52.McCarthy JG, Katzen T, Hopper R, et al.: The first decade of mandibular distraction: lessons we have learned. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:1704-1713,2002 53.McCormick SU, McCarthy JG, Grayson BH, Staffenberg D. Effect of mandibular distraction on the temporomandibular joint. Part 1, Canine study. J Craniofac Surg 6:358-363,1995 54.McCormick SU, Grayson BH, McCarthy JG, Staffenberg D. Effect of mandibular distraction on the temporomandibular joint. Part 2, Clinical study. J Craniofac Surg 6:364-367,1995 55.McCormick SU. Reconstruction of the mandibular condyle using transport distraction osteogenesis. J Craniofac Surg 8(1):48-52; discussion 53,1997 56.Mehrara BJ, Rowe NM, Steinbrech DS, et al. Rat mandibular distraction osteogenesis: Part II. Molecular analysis of transforming growth factor beta-1 and osteocalcin gene expression. Plast Reconstr Surg 103:536,1999 57.Mofid MM, Manson PN, Robertson BC, Tufaro AP, Elias J J. Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: A review of 3278 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:1103; discussion 1115,2001 58.Molina F, Ortiz-Monasterio F. Mandibular elongation and remodeling by distraction: A farewell to major osteotomies. Plast Reconstr Surg 96:825,1995 59.Nakai H, Niimi A, Ueda M. The influence of compressive loading on growth of cartilage of the mandibular condyle in vitro. Arch Oral Biol 43:505-515,1998 60.Nakamura E, Mizuta H, Sei A, et al. Knee articular cartilage injury in leg lengthening: Histological studies in rabbits. Acta Orthop Scand 64:437,1993 61.Padwa BL, Zaragoza SM, Sonis AL. Proximal segment displacement in mandibular distraction osteogenesis. J craniofac surg 13(2):293-296,2002 62.Puzas JE, Landeau JM, Tallents R, Albright J, Schwarz EM, Landesberg R. Degradative pathways in tissues of the temporomandibular joint. Cells Tissues Organs 169:248-256,2001 63.Roth S, Muller K, Fischer DC, Dannhauer KH. Specific properties of the extracellular chondroitin sulphate proteoglycans. Arch Oral Biol 42:63,1997 64.Sabatini M, Rolland G, Leonce S, Thomas M, Lesur C, Perez V, de Nanteuil G, Bonnet J. Effects of Ceramide on apoptosis, proteoglycan degradation, and matrix metalloproteinase expression in rabbit articular cartilage. Biochemical and Boiphysical Research Communications 267:438-444,2000 65.Samchukov ML, Cope JB, Harper RP, Ross JD. Biomechanical considerations of mandibular lengthening and widening by gradual distraction using a computer model. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 56:51-59,1998 66.Schumacher B, Keller J, Hvid I. Distraction effects on muscle: Leg lengthening studied in rabbits. Acta Orthop Scand 65:647-650,1994 67.Snyder CC, Levine GA, Swanson HM, Browne EZ Jr. Mandibular lengthening by gradual distraction: preliminary report. J Oral Surg 51:506-508,1973 68.Somerville RPT, Oblander SA, Apte SS. Matrix metalloproteinases: old dogs with new tricks. Genome Biology 4(6):216,2003 69.Stelnicki EJ, Stucki-McCormick SU, Rowe N, McCarthy JG. Remodeling of the temporomandibular joint following mandibular distraction osteogenesis in the transverse dimension. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:647-658,2001 70.van Strijen PJ, Breuning KH, Becking AG, Tuinzing DB. Condylar resorption following distraction osteogenesis: A case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 59:1104-1107,2001 71.Thurmüller P, Troulis MJ, Rosenberg A, Kaban LB. Changes in the condyle and disc in response to distraction osteogenesis of the minipig mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60:1327-1333,2002 72.Thurmüller P, Troulis MJ, Rosenberg A, Chuang SK, Kaban LB. Microscopic changes in the condyle and disc in response to distraction osteogenesis of the minipig mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64:249-258,2006 73.Troulis MJ, Glowacki J, Perrott DH, Kaban LB. Effects of latency and rate on bone formation in a porcine mandibular distraction model. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58:507-13,2000 74.Troulis MJ, Padwa B, Kaban LB. Distraction osteogenesis: Past, present, and future. Facial Plast Surg 14:205,1998 75.Vu TH, Shipley JM, Bergers G, et al. MMP-9/gelatinase B is a key regulator of growth plate angiogenesis and apoptosis of hypertrophic chondrocytes. Cell 93(3):411-422,1998 76.Wang X, Mao JJ. Chondrocyte proliferation of the cranial base cartilage upon in vivo mechanical stresses. J Dent Res 81(10):701-705,2002 77.Weil TS, Van Sickels JE, Payne JC. Distraction osteogenesis for correction of transverse mandibular deficiency: a preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55:953,1997 78.Weiss S, Zimmermann G, Baumgart R, Kasten P, Bidlingmaier M, Henle P. Systemic regulation of angiogenesis and matrix degradation in bone regeneration- Distraction osteogenesis compared to rigid fracture healing. Bone 37:781-790,2005 79.曾 慧:生長期迷你豬施行單側下顎骨牽引性骨生成術之骨骼三度空間形態變化。國立臺灣大學臨床牙醫學研究所碩士論文,2003。 80.鄭位明、王佩華、章浩宏、宋永義。小耳種李宋系迷你豬乳齒萌發順序之研究。中國畜牧學會會誌28(3):347-358,1999 81.鄭位明、王佩華、張直、章浩宏、姜延年。小耳種李宋系迷你豬恆齒萌發順序之研究。中國畜牧學會會誌 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/32169 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 牽引性骨生成術(Distraction Osteogenesis)廣泛應用於治療成長期中顱顏部發育異常的病患,使之能夠提早建立正常的生理性功能。然而文獻中關於下顎牽引性骨生成術造成顳顎關節的變化尚無定論,其中又很少將生長因素列入考量。本實驗的目的即為以生長期迷你豬為實驗對象,探討單側下顎牽引性骨生成術對顳顎關節的影響。
實驗共計14隻具有生長潛力的迷你豬(年齡分布為5週至12週大,體重從6公斤到15公斤),分成四組:(1)實驗組A,n=5,實驗側施行單側下顎骨截斷並裝置口內延長器,術後經過7天的延遲期,每天以0.9公釐的速度逐漸延長下顎,共延長14天,延長完成當日進行犧牲。(2)實驗組B,n=2,延長完成後固定4週再進行犧牲,以觀察長期的變化。(3)控制組,n=5,實驗側施行單側下顎骨截斷並裝置口內延長器,但未實施牽引。(4)正常組,n=2,為與實驗組B犧牲時年齡相近的健康迷你豬,作為提供正常組織的對照。研究共分四部分探討顳顎關節的變化:(1)以立體重組影像觀察下顎髁頭形態變化及下顎髁頭與顳窩相對位置改變情形。(2)以HE染色法觀察組織學特徵及比較關節軟骨厚度變化。(3)以免疫組織化學染色法觀察軟骨層中MMP9蛋白分佈的情形。(4)以TUNEL偵測法觀察軟骨層中細胞凋亡的情形。 結果顯示,顳顎關節在牽引作用下會有形態、位置及組織學上的改變,而其作用牽引側比控制側明顯;牽引結束後立即觀察,軟骨下成骨活動及基質代謝速率上升,但是經過4週的固定期,軟骨厚度略為變薄,這些變化也會有逐漸回復的現象,顯示生長期中迷你豬的關節軟骨適應能力;根據下顎髁頭相對位置改變情形以及關節軟骨厚度變化情形,推測牽引過程中,髁頭的外側1/3及中側1/3部分為受力較大部分;另外,牽引在顳顎關節區域產生的力量並未顯著地使細胞凋亡的數目增加。因此,牽引性骨生成術以能夠有效地延長下顎,而其對顳顎關節的影響似乎為暫時性的,惟在形態上的變化以及可能對下顎運動功能的影響仍須更長期的追蹤觀察。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Distraction osteogenesis has been widely used in congenital anomalies to correct craniofacial deficiency. Clinically it is frequently conducted on growing patients for early establishment of normal physiological functions. However, the effects on temporomandibular joints due to mandibular distraction are still controversial, and the influence of growth was not taken into consideration in most of the research. In this study, we investigated the effects on TMJs in growing mini-pigs in which unilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis was performed.
Fourteen (5~12 weeks, 6~15kg weight) Lee-Sung genus of mini-pigs were divided into 4 groups: 1) Experimental group A (n=5), received osteotomy and the distractor device (Leibinger intraoral distractor) was fixed on one side of the mandible. After one-week latency period, the mandible was distracted for 2 weeks with the velocity of 0.9 mm/day. At the end of distraction, the animals were sacrificed immediately. 2) Experimental group B (n=2), the animals received the similar treatment as Experimental group A, except that they were sacrificed after a consolidation period of 4 weeks for the long-term observation. 3) Control group (n=5), received osteotomy but the distractor device was placed without distraction. And 4) Normal group, 2 healthy mini-pigs without any operation were used to provide information of normal structures. Changes of temporomandibular joints in the experimental groups were detected from 4 different approaches. 1) Using three-dimensional reconstruction using MRI image data, to observe morphological changes of mandibular condyle and relative position between temporal fossa and condyle. 2) From the H & E staining of different portion of the condyles, to observe histological characteristics and changes of thickness of condylar cartilage. 3) Via immunohistochemical analysis, to observe the distribution of MMP9 in cartilage. 4) Using TUNEL staining method, to detect apoptosis in chondrocytes in the sections of condylar cartilage. There were detectable changes in morphology, position and histological characteristics of condyle after unilateral mandibular distraction and the extent of changes was more obvious at the distraction side than control side. Increased activities of subchondrol ossification and matrix degradation after distraction were noticed. After a 4-week consolidation, these changes returned to the normal level; however, the thickness of cartilage decreased. These findings revealed the enormous adaptive capacity of condyle in growing animals. Changes in the position of condyle and thickness of cartilage also suggested that the lateral and middle third of condylar head were under higher degree of loading. Additionally, the number of apoptotic chondrocytes did not obviously increase under distraction. In conclusion, distraction osteogenesis is an effective way to lengthen the mandible with minimal and transient changes of TMJ. A more long-term observation is required to follow the morphological change of condyle and its consequences on the mandibular movement and function if it is not a reversible process. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T03:34:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-95-P91422009-1.pdf: 5050071 bytes, checksum: a2d729a1c176df903f394bc119e48bb5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
目錄………………………………………………………………………. I 表目錄……………………………………………………………………. II 圖目錄……………………………………………………………………. IV 中文摘要…………………………………………………………………. VI 英文摘要…………………………………………………………………. VIII 第一章 緒論…..…………………………………………………………. 1 第二章 實驗目的..………………………………………………………. 11 第三章 材料與方法…………………………..…………………………. 12 第四章 結果………………………………………………………..……. 21 第五章 討論………………………………………………………..……. 28 第六章 結論……..………………………………………………………. 37 附表………………………………………………………………………. 39 附圖………………………………………………………………………. 50 參考文獻…………………………………………………………………. 80 表目錄 表一 迷你豬齒齡對照表…………………………………………….. 39 表二 迷你豬實驗分配表…………………………………………….. 39 表三 牽引量與中線偏移測量……………………………………….. 40 表四 組內比較 (分成九區)— 正常組……………………………… 41 表五 組內比較 (分成九區)— 實驗組A…………………………… 41 表六 組內比較 (分成九區)— 實驗組B……………………………. 41 表七 組內比較 (分成九區)— 控制組……………………………… 41 表八 組內比較 (分成前中後三區)— 正常組……………………… 42 表九 組內比較 (分成前中後三區)— 實驗組A…………………… 42 表十 組內比較 (分成前中後三區)— 實驗組B……………………. 42 表十一 組內比較 (分成前中後三區)— 控制組……………………… 42 表十二 組內比較 (分成外中內三區)— 正常組……………………… 43 表十三 組內比較 (分成外中內三區)— 實驗組A…………………… 43 表十四 組內比較 (分成外中內三區)— 實驗組B……………………. 43 表十五 組內比較 (分成外中內三區)— 控制組……………………… 43 表十六 實驗側組間比較 (分成九區)………………………………….. 44 表十七 實驗側組間比較 (分成前中後三區)………………………….. 45 表十八 實驗側組間比較 (分成外中內三區)………………………….. 45 表十九 控制側組間比較 (分成九區)………………………………….. 46 表二十 控制側組間比較 (分成前中後三區)………………………….. 47 表二十一 控制側組間比較 (分成外中內三區)………………………….. 47 表二十二 比值(實驗側/控制側)組間比較 (分成九區)………………….. 48 表二十三 比值(實驗側/控制側)組間比較 (分成前中後三區)………….. 49 表二十四 比值(實驗側/控制側)組間比較 (分成外中內三區)………….. 49 圖目錄 圖一 小耳種李宋系迷你豬生長曲線圖 (週齡—體重)………………... 50 圖二 手術過程…………………………………………………………… 51 圖三 犧牲過程…………………………………………………………… 51 圖四 牽引量之測量……………………………………………………… 51 圖五 核磁共振影像進行三度空間重組………………………………… 52 圖六 髁頭軟骨厚度測量法……………………………………………… 53 圖七 頦下測顱X光片及描繪…………………………………………… 54 圖八 牽引後中線偏移及下顎骨形態變化情形………………………… 54 圖九 立體影像重組—下顎髁頭 正常組……………………………… 55 圖十 髁頭形態變化—正常組與實驗組B (Anterior view)…………….. 56 圖十一 髁頭形態變化—正常組與實驗組B (Posterior view)……………. 56 圖十二 髁頭形態變化—正常組與實驗組B (Posterior-superior view)…... 56 圖十三 髁頭形態變化—正常組與實驗組B (Lateral view)………………. 57 圖十四 髁頭形態變化—正常組與實驗組B (Medial view)………………. 57 圖十五 髁頭與顳窩相對位置變化—正常組與實驗組B (實驗側)………. 58 圖十六 髁頭與顳窩相對位置變化—正常組與實驗組B (控制側)………. 59 圖十七 髁頭與顳窩相對位置變化—正常組與實驗組B (Posterior view).. 60 圖十八 顳顎關節組織學—正常組………………………………………… 61 圖十九 顳顎關節組織學比較—實驗側…………………………………… 62 圖二十 顳顎關節組織學比較—控制側…………………………………… 63 圖二十一 軟骨內成骨活動比較—實驗側…………………………………… 64 圖二十二 軟骨內成骨活動比較—控制側…………………………………… 65 圖二十三 MMP9蛋白免疫組織化學染色— 正常組……………………….. 66 圖二十四 MMP9蛋白免疫組織化學染色— 實驗組A實驗側……….……. 67 圖二十五 MMP9蛋白免疫組織化學染色— 實驗組A控制側………….…. 68 圖二十六 MMP9蛋白免疫組織化學染色— 實驗組B實驗側………….…. 69 圖二十七 MMP9蛋白免疫組織化學染色— 實驗組B控制側…………….. 70 圖二十八 MMP9蛋白免疫組織化學染色— 控制組實驗側……………….. 71 圖二十九 MMP9蛋白免疫組織化學染色— 控制組控制側……………….. 72 圖三十 細胞凋亡偵測— 正常組………………………………………….. 73 圖三十一 細胞凋亡偵測— 實驗組A實驗側……………………………….. 74 圖三十二 細胞凋亡偵測— 實驗組A控制側………………………………. 75 圖三十三 細胞凋亡偵測— 實驗組B實驗側……………………….………. 76 圖三十四 細胞凋亡偵測— 實驗組B控制側……………………………….. 77 圖三十五 細胞凋亡偵測— 控制組實驗側………………………………….. 78 圖三十六 細胞凋亡偵測— 控制組控制側………………………………….. 79 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 生長期迷你豬施行單側下顎骨
牽引性骨生成術之顳顎關節變化 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Changes of TMJ Following Mandibular
Distraction Osteogenesis in Growing Mini-pigs | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 94-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳羿貞,陳韻之,許明倫 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 牽引性骨生成術,迷你豬,顳顎關節,軟骨細胞, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | distraction osteogenesis,mini-pig,temporomandibular joint,chondrocyte, | en |
dc.relation.page | 87 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2006-07-27 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 臨床牙醫學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 臨床牙醫學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-95-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 4.93 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。