請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/31956
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 曹承礎 | |
dc.contributor.author | Tsai-Chuan Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃采娟 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T03:25:50Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2008-07-31 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2006-07-31 | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2006-07-28 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 參 考 文 獻
一、中文部份 【1】 朱浤源編(1999)。撰寫博碩士論文實戰手冊。正中書局。 【2】 朱道凱譯(1999)。平衡計分卡:資訊時代的策略管理工具(Robert S. Kaplan , David P. Norton, The Balanced Scorecard),台北。 【3】 吳安妮(1993)。平衡計分卡之精髓、範疇及整合(上)。會計研究月刊,211期,46。 【4】 吳琮璠(1997)。資訊管理個案研究方法。資訊管理學報,第四卷第一期,1-22。 【5】 吳琮璠、謝清佳(2000)。資訊管理-理論與實務(第四版)。台北:智勝。 【6】 李明軒、高登第譯(2001)。Michael E. Porter著。競爭論(上)(下)。天下文化。 【7】 周齊武、Kamal Haddad、吳安妮、李惠娟(2001)。平衡計分卡於服務部門之應用-以資訊部門為例(一)。會計研究月刊,第192期,100-102。 【8】 林季慶(2004)。平衡計分卡於半導體產業策略管理之設計-以某積體電路(IC)設計公司為例。國立中正大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 【9】 林東清(1995)。資訊部門角色地位與績效之相關性研究。台大管理論叢,第六卷,第二期,83-108。 【10】 林東清(1996)。我國資訊部門的角色扮演之分析。資訊經理人-會務通訊,第三十八期。 【11】 邱清治(1985)。我國企業資訊部門績效評估之研究。國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 【12】 高美英譯(1999)。研究文獻之回顧與整合。Harris M. Cooper原著。台北市:弘智。 【13】 張瓊、于祺明、劉文君著(1994)。科學理論模型的建構。淑馨出版。 【14】 許士軍(2000)。走向創新時代的組織績效評估。天下文化哈佛商業評論-績效評估導讀,3-9。 【15】 郭榮昌(1998)。ERP專刊。電子時報,第82期。 【16】 陳怡潔譯(1998)。人類行為與社會環境。(Robert L. Berger、James T. McBreen、Marilyn J. Rifkin著。揚智文化。 【17】 陳貞夙(2001)。以資訊時代組織轉型觀點建構企業資訊基礎建設的理論模型。國立台灣大學資訊管理研究所博士論文。 【18】 章誠孝(2004)。知識管理中知識基本性質之研究-以一般系統理論為方法。私立中原大學企業管理學系碩士論文。 【19】 鄒育菁(2000)。應用Porter之策略理論於平衡計分卡的規劃與設計—以A客運公司國道台北-新竹線為例。國立交通大學運輸工程與管理學系研究所碩士論文。 【20】 褚秀敏(1998)。關鍵成功因素與績效評估制度關連性之研究-以郵局為例。國立台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 【21】 蔡渭水、林震岩、陳宗賢(1990)。資訊主管角色與資訊部門績效關係之研究。中原學報,19:156-167。 【22】 薛崴立(2003)。企業內人員對資訊部門評價之探討-以個案銀行為例。國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。 【23】 顏忠誠(2002)。銀行業e化關鍵成功因素之研究。國立高雄第一科技大學金融營運所碩士論文。 【24】 羅正普(2002)。以策略觀點建構資訊時代事業模式理論模型之研究。國立台灣大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。 【25】 羅盛宏(2005)。採用平衡計分卡觀點建構資訊部門績效評估準則-資訊系統自行開發與委外服務之比較研究。私立中原大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。 二、英文部份 [1] Applegate, L.M., McFarlan, F.W. & McKenney, J.L.(1996).Corporate Information Systems Management. Text and Cases. 4th ed., Irwin.. [2] Astley, W.G., Van de Van, A.H.(1983).Central Perspectives and Debates in Organization Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 28. [3] Bakos J.Y., Treacy M.E.(1986).Information Technology and Corporate Strategy-A Research Perspective, MIS Quarterly, June. [4] Besanko, D., D. Dranove, and M. Shanley.(2000).Economics of Strategy. 2nd ed. John Wiley&Sons, Inc. [5] Bharadwaj, A.S.(2000).A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation. MIS Quarterly, vol. 24, no. 1, Mar., pp.169-196. [6] Bonoma, T.V.(1985).Case Research in Marketing : Opportunities, Problems, and a Process. Journal of Marketing Research. Vol. 22. May, pp. 887-898. [7] Bushman, R.M., Indjejikian, R.J., Smith, A.(1996).CEO compensation: The role of individual performance evaluation. journal of accounting and economics 21(April): 161-193. [8] Cash J.I., F.W. McKenney, J.R. McFarlan & M.R. (1988). Vitale, Corporate information Systems Managements: Text and Case, Homewood, Irwin, IL [9] Chang, O.T. & Chow, C.W.(1999).The balanced scorecard: a potential tool for supporting change and continuous improvement in accounting education. Issues in Accounting Education.14(3): 395-412. [10] Crowston, K. & Malone, T.W.(1994). Information Technology and Work Organization. in Information Technology and the Corporation of the 1990s, Allen, T.J. & Scott Morton, M.S.,, Eds., Oxford University Press. [11] Cummings, T.G. & Worley, C.G.(1997). Organization Development and Change 6th ed., International Thomson Publishing. [12] Dabbs, J.K.(1982). Making Things Visible, in Varieties of Qualitative Research, John Van Maanan, J. M. Dabbs, Jr., and Robert R. Faulker, eds. 1982, Beverly Hills, CA : Sage Publications pp.31-64. [13] Daniels, JL & Daniels, NC (1996). Building global competence. In Jerry N. Luftman (Ed.), Competing in the. information age: Strategic alignment in practice (pp. 97-133). NY: Oxford University Press. [14] Earl, M.J.(1993). Experiences in Strategic Information Systems Planning. MIS Quarterly (17:1), pp. 1-24. [15] Eccles, R.G., & Pyburn, P.J.(1992). Creating a comprehensive system to measure performance. Management Accounting (October): 41-44. [16] Evans, Hugh, Ashworth G., Chellew, M., Davidson A. & Towers D.(1996). Exploiting Activity-Based Information : Easy as ABC. Management Accounting, London. [17] Foss, N.J.(1997). Resource and Strategy: A Brief Overview of Themes and Contributions. in Resources, Firms, and Strategies: A Reader in the resource-Based Perspective. Oxford University Press. [18] Foss, N.J.(1997).Resource and Strategy: Problems, Open Issues, and Ways Ahead. in Resources, Firms, and Strategies: A Reader in the resource-Based Perspective. Oxford University Press. [19] Gold, C.(1992).Total quality management in information services – IS measures: a balancing act. Research Note Ernst & Young Center for Information Technology and Strategy, Boston. [20] Grant, R. M.(1995). Contemporary Strategy Analysis, Blackwell Publishers Inc., Oxford, UK. [21] Grant, R.M.(1991). The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), Spr. 1991, pp.114-135. [22] Hagood, W. & Friedman ,L.(2002, Winter). The Balanced Scorecard to Measure the Performance of Your HR Information System. Public Personnel Management, vol.31, No. 4. [23] Hatch, M.J.(1997). Organization Theory, Oxford University Press. [24] Henderson, J.C. & Venkatraman, N.(1993). Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations, IBM Systems Journal, 32(1), 4-16. [25] Henderson, J.C., Venkatraman, N. & Oldach, Scott. Alignment Business and IT strategies. Competing in the information age : Strategy alignment in practice, in Jerry N. Luftman(ed), New York, Oxford U.Press, 1996, pp21-42. [26] Jahankhani H., Ekeigwe JI.(2005).Adaptation of the balanced scorecard model to the IT functions. Information Technology and Applications. ICITA Third International Conference on Publication Date: 4-7 July Volume: 2, On page(s): 784- 787 vol.2. [27] Kaplan, R.S. & D.P. Norton (1993).Putting the balanced scorecard to work. Harvard Business Review, 71(5), 134–142. [28] Kaplan, R.S. & D.P. Norton (1996). Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action, Boston: Harvard Business School Press. [29] Kaplan, R.S. & D.P. Norton (1996a). Linking the Balance Scorecard to Strategy. California Management Review, (39) 1, pp. 53-79. [30] Kaplan, R.S. & D.P. Norton (1996b). Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review 74, 1996, 75–85. [31] Kaplan, R.S. & D.P. Norton(1992). The Balanced Scorecard: Measures That Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, (70) 1, pp. 71-79. [32] Leavitt, H. J., & Whisler, T.(1958). Management in the 1980’s”, Harvard Business Review, Nov.-Dec. [33] Leavitt, H.J.(1965). Applied Organization Change in Industry”, in Handbook of Organization, March., J.G. Eds., Rand McNally. [34] Lederer, Albert, L. & Mendelow, A.L. (1986). Issues in Information Systems Planning, Information and Management. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 10, No. 5, pp.245-254. [35] Lee, C.(1985). Increasing performance appraisal effectiveness matching task types, appraisal process, and rater training. Academy of Management Review 10(2): 322-331. [36] Lewis, D.(2003). it Turnarounds.Computerworld,vol.37, Iss.39,P.44. [37] Lipe, M.G.(2000). The balanced scorecard: judgmental effects of common and unique performance measures. The Accounting Review, 75, 283-298. [38] Luftman, J.N.(1996). Applying the Strategic Alignment Model, in Competing in the Information Age Strategic Alignment in Practice, Luftman, J.N. Eds., Oxford University Press [39] Markus, M.L. & Robey, D.(1988). Information Technology and Organizational Change: Causal Structure in Theory and Research', Management Science, Vol. 34, No. 5,May. [40] Martinsons, M., R. Davison, & Tse, D.(1999.February). The Balanced Scorecard: A Foundation for the Strategic Management of Information systems. Decision Support Systems, 25(1), 71-88. [41] McFarlan, F.W.(May-June 1984) Information Technology Changes the Way You Compete. Harvard Business Review. [42] McFarlan, F.W., McKenney, J.L. & Pyburn, F.(1983). The Information Archipelago-Plotting a Course. Harvard Business Review, 16: 145-156. [43] McLaughlin, M. Howe R, & Cash, J(1983).Changing competitive ground rules-the impact of computers and communication in the 1980s. Unpublished working paper. [44] Mockler, R.J. & Dologite, D.G.(1991). Knowledge-based systems to support strategic planning decisionmaking. System Sciences, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference. vol.3, 173-180. [45] Niven, Paul.R.(2002). Balanced Scorecard Step by Step:Maximizing Performance and Maintaining Results. New York:John Wiley & Sons. [46] Nolan, R.L.(1979). Managing the crises in data processing, Harvard Business Review, Vol.57, 2, March-April 1979, pp115-126. [47] Porter, M.(1980). Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York, NY: The Free Press, A division of Macmillan, Inc., c1980. [48] Porter, M.(1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and sustaining Superior Performance, Free Press, New York. [49] Porter, M.(2001). Strategy and the Internet. Harvard Business Review. March, p.63-78. [50] Porter, M.E.. & Millar, V.E. (July-Aug. 1985). How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Bus. Rev. 63, 4, 149-160. [51] Rockart, J.F. & Short, J.E.(1991). The Network Organization and the Management of Interdependence in The Corporation of the 1990s: Information Technology and Organizational Transformation, Scott Morton, M. S. Eds., Oxford University Press. [52] Schein, E.H.(1992). Organizational Culture and Leadership, 2nd ed., Jossey-Bass. [53] Schein, E.H.(1994). Innovation Culture and Organizations”, in Information Technology and the Corporation of the 1990s, Allen, T.J. & Scott Morton, M.S., Eds., Oxford University Press. [54] Schein, E.H.(1994). The Role of the CEO in the Management of Change: The Case of Information Technology “, in Information Technology and the Corporation of the 1990s, Allen, T.J. & Scott Morton, M.S., Eds., Oxford University Press. [55] Scott Morton, M.S.(1991). The Corporation of the 1990s: Information Technology and Organizational Transformation, Oxford University Press. [56] Scott, W.R.(1998). Organizations: Rational, National, and Open Systems, Prentice-Hall. [57] Sprague R.H. & Mcnurlin B.C.(1993), Information System Management in Practice, 3rd ed., Prentice-Hall. [58] Teo, H.H., Tan, B.C.Y. & Wei, K.K.(1997). Organizational Transformation Using Electronic Data Exchange: The Case of TradeNet in Singapore. Journal of MIS, Vol. 13, No. 4, Spring. [59] Van Grembergen, W. & D. Timmerman(1998). Monitoring the it process through the balanced score card”, Proceedings of the 9th Information Resources Management (IRMA) International Conference, Boston, May 1998, pp. 105-116. [60] Van Grembergen, W. & R. Van Bruggen. (1997). Measuring and improving corporate information technology through the balanced scorecard technique”, Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on the Evaluation of Information technology, Deflt, October, pp. 163-171. [61] Van Grembergen, W. & Saull, Ronald. (2001). Aligning Business and Information Technology through the Balanced Scorecard at a Major Canadian Financial Group: its Status Measured with an it BSC Maturity Model. Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), January, Maui, Hawaii. [62] Van Grembergen, W.(2000). The balanced scorecard and it governance. Information Systems Control Journal (previously IS Audit & Control Journal), Volume 2, 2000, pp.40-43. [63] Van Maanen, J.(1970). Reclaiming Qualitative Methods for Organizational Research : A Preface. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.24, December, pp.520-526. [64] Venkatraman, N.(1991), IT-induced business reconfiguration. In The corporation of the 1990’s: Information technology and organizational transformation, U.K.: OxfordPress. pp.122-158. [65] Ward, J., Peppard, J.(2002).Strategic Planning for Information Systems, 3rd Edition. [66] Ward, J.; Griffiths, P. & Whitmore, P.(1990).Strategic Planning for Information Systems, Chichester: Wiley. [67] Willcocks, L.(1995). Information management. The evaluation of information systems investments, Chapman & Hall, London. [68] Williams, S.T.(2001). Technology Planning for The Community Bank, Community Banker, 10(2), pp .24-27. 三、參考網頁 {1} http://www.netmba.com/strategy/value-chain/ {2} http://www.anu.edu.au/people/Roger.Clarke/SOS/StratISTh.html {3} 數位時代論壇 http://www.bnext.com.tw/special_mag/2000_12_15/2000_12_15.html {4} 中原大學ERP中心 http://www.erp.org.tw/info/infocontent.asp?no=1918 {5} http://www.ism-journal.com/ITToday/ {6} 王忠宗,採購與供應鏈管理 http://www.china-mgt.com.tw/talk-10.htm {7} 電子商務與供應鏈管理之最佳化 http://www.nii.org.tw/cnt/info/Report/20020401_11.htm | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/31956 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 現今資訊科技發展迅速,對組織的影響也日益明顯,而資訊部門是引進資訊科技至組織中的重要部門,隨著資訊科技角色的變遷,資訊部門也逐漸為組織所重視,其功能亦從支援、輔助的角色,搖身一變為組織中不可或缺的策略性角色,然因各組織對資訊科技的重視程度不一,以致現今資訊部門在組織中或為支援性部門,或是服務性部門,或是系統開發者,抑或策略性角色等,其功能角色可謂莫衷一是。而現今對於資訊部門的功能定位又無過多著墨,鮮少有文獻提及,以致資訊部門時常「妾身未明」,難以釐清自身在組織中的功能與地位。
是以,本研究即以「建構資訊部門功能定位理論模式」為題,並以整合性的觀點,從策略與組織營運的角度考量,將資源論、價值論以及平衡計分卡中與資訊科技相關的研究,作一統整性的資訊部門功能定位架構,以釐清資訊部門可擁有的功能性,從而建構出資訊部門功能定位理論模型,並據此開展出功能定位雷達圖,以作為資訊部門檢視自身定位的工具。 從本研究資訊部門功能定位理論模型中,可知資訊部門可具備資訊科技基礎建設、資訊科技人力資源、資訊科技驅動能力、企業資源規劃、顧客關係管理、供應鏈管理、全球運籌管理及價值貢獻等八大功能。然成功的理論模型需經過檢驗方能具備解釋力,故特別以Earl經實證研究的資訊科技在企業中應用的五種理想類型為分析實例,據以檢測本理論模型的正確性與應用性,經研究發現,本理論模型明顯具有分析性、區隔性與檢測性,可清楚釐清資訊部門的功能定位,並提供未來的發展方向,堪稱目前分析資訊部門功能較為全面的理論模型。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T03:25:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-95-R93725017-1.pdf: 2423813 bytes, checksum: bd4857be71a3c86e2dd8c2676f1d04b9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
第一章 緒論 7 第一節 研究動機 7 第二節 研究目的 8 第三節 論文架構 10 第二章 文獻探討 11 第一節 資訊部門角色的變遷 11 第二節 資訊科技對於組織理論的衝擊 15 第三節 資訊科技的策略定位 18 2.3.1 策略調準模型 20 2.3.2 策略分析法 25 第四節 資訊部門的平衡計分卡應用 35 2.4.1 平衡計分卡 35 2.4.2 資訊部門平衡計分卡 40 第五節 小結 48 第三章 研究設計 49 第一節 研究方法 50 3.1.1 研究文獻分析法 50 3.1.2 理論模型建構法 51 第二節 研究架構 52 第三節 研究流程 53 第四章 資訊部門功能定位理論模型的建立 55 第一節 資源論-資訊科技能力架構 57 第二節 價值論-資訊科技價值鏈架構 61 第三節 資訊部門的平衡計分卡架構 71 第四節 資訊部門功能定位整合性架構 73 4.4.1 整合性架構的理論模型 74 4.4.2 功能定位雷達圖 79 第五章 「資訊部門功能定位理論模型」分析實例 85 第一節 實例背景 85 第二節 實例分析 87 第三節 小結 97 第六章 結論 99 第一節 研究結論 99 第二節 研究限制 103 第三節 未來研究方向 103 參 考 文 獻 105 附錄一 資訊部門功能檢測表 113 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 以整合性觀點建構資訊部門功能定位理論模型之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Qualitative Model for the Functional Role of Enterprise IT Department | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 94-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 吳玲玲 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蔡益坤 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 資訊部門,功能角色,理論模型,資訊科技,策略,平衡計分卡, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | IT Department,Functional Role,Theoretical Model,Information Technology (IT),Strategy,Balanced Scorecard, | en |
dc.relation.page | 115 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2006-07-29 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 資訊管理學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 資訊管理學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-95-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.37 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。