請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/31950完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 蔡益坤(Yih-Kuen Tsay) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chia-Tzu Hsieh | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 謝佳慈 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T03:25:37Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2006-07-29 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2006-07-29 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2006-07-27 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Vikas Agarwal, Koustuv Dasgupta, Neeran Karnik, Arun Kum, Ashish Kundu,
Sumit Mittal, and Biplav Srivastava. A Service Creation Environment Based on End to End Composition of Web Services. 2005. [2] Franz Baader, Diego Calvanese, McGuinness Deborah, Daniele Nardi, and Peter F. Patel-Schneider. The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press, 2003. [3] Tom Bellwood, Luc Clement, David Ehnebuske, Andrew Hately, Maryann Hondo, Yin L. Husband, Karsten Januszewski, Sam Lee, Barbara McKee, Joel Munter, and Claus V. Riegen. UDDI Version 3.0 Published Specification. Technical report, www.uddi.org, 2002. [4] Don Box, David Ehnebuske, Gopal Kakivaya, Andrew Layman, Noah Mendelsohn, Henrik F. Nielsen, Satish Thatte, and Dave Winer. Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) 1.1. Technical report, www.w3c.org, 2000. [5] Christoph Bussler, Dieter Fensel, and Alexander Maedche. A Conceptual Architecture for Semantic Wen Enabled Web Services. Technical report, http:// swws.semanticweb.org, 2002. [6] Michael Champion, Chris Ferris, Eric Newcomer, and David Orchard. Web Services Architecture. Technical report, www.w3c.org, 2002. [7] Po-Chun Chen. The Trip Planner: Exploring an Ontology-Based Web Service Composition and Brokering Framework. Master’s thesis, National Taiwan University, June 2004. [8] Roberto Chinnici, Martin Gudgin, Jean J. Moreau, and Sanjiva Weerawarana. Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 1.2. Technical report, www.w3c.org, 2002. [9] The DAML Services Coalition. DAML-S: Semantic Markup for Web Services. Technical report, www.daml.org, 2002. [10] The OWL Services Coalition. OWL-S: Semantic Markup forWeb Services. Technical report, www.w3.org, 2004. [11] Francisco Curbera, Yaron Goland, Johannes Klein, Frank Leymann, Dieter Roller, and Sanjiva Weerawarana. Business Process Execution Language for Web Services, Version 1.0. Technical report, www.ibm.com, 2002. [12] Jos de Bruijn, Holger Lausen, Reto Krummenacher, Axel Polleres, Livia Predoiu, Michael Kifer, and Dieter Fensel. Web Service Modeling Language (WSML). Technical report, www.wsmo.org, 2005. [13] Mike Dean. Semantic Web Rules: Covering The Use Cases. In Proceedings of RuleML2004, volume LNCS 3323, pages 1–5. Springer-Verlag, 2004. [14] A. Dogac, Y. Kabak, G. Laleci, S. Sinir, A. Yildiz, S. Kirbas, and Y. Gurcan. Semantically Enriched Web Services for the Travel Industry. ACM Sigmod Record, 33(3), 2004. [15] A. Dogac, Y. Kabak, G. Laleci, S. Sinir, A. Yildiz, and A. Tumer. SATINE Project : Exploiting Web Services in the Travel Industry. 2004. [16] D. Fensel and C. Bussler. The Web Service Modeling Framwork (WSMF). Technical report, The European Union Semantic Web enabled Web Services Project (SWWS), 2005. [17] Thomas R. Gruber. A Translation Approach To Portable Ontology Specifications. Technical report, Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Computer Science Department, Stanford University, 1993. [18] Michael Gruninger and Christopher. The Process Specification Language PSL Theory and Apllications. American Association for Artificial Intelligence, pages 63–74, 2003. [19] I. Horrocks and U. Sattler. The Effect of Adding Complex Role Inclusion Axioms in Description Logics. In Proceedings Eighteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2003), pages 343–348. Morgan Kauffman, August 2003. ISBN 0927056637. [20] Ian Horrocks, Peter F. Patel-Schneider, and Frank Van Harmelen. From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: The Making of aWeb Ontology Language. Journal of Web Semantics, 1(1):7–26, 2003. [21] Ian Horrocks, Peter F. Patel-Schneider, Harold Boley, Said Tabet, Benjamin Grosof, and Mike Dean. SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML. Technical report, www.daml.org, 2004. [22] Chen-Feng Huang. A Semantic-Based Framework for Web Services Composition, 2005. [23] Arun Kumar, Biplav Srivastava, and Sumit Mittal. Information Modeling for End to End Composition of Semantic Web Services. In ISWC 2005, pages 476–490. Springer-Verlag, 2005. [24] Hector J. Levesque, Raymond Reiter, Yves Lesperance, Fangzhen Lin, and Richard B. Scherl. GOLOG: A logic programming language for dynamic domains. The Journal of Logic Programming, 31(1-3):59–83, 1997. [25] Wei-Lun Lu. Approximate Matching of Service Descriptions Using Ontologies and Rules, 2006. [26] David L. Martin, Massimo Paolucci, Sheila A. McIlraith, Mark H. Burstein, Drew V. McDermott, Deborah L. McGuinness, Bijan Parsia, Terry R. Payne, Marta Sabou, Monika Solanki, Naveen Srinivasan, and Katia P. Sycara. Bringing Semantics to Web Services: The OWL-S Approach. In SWSWPC, pages 26–42, 2004. [27] Sheila McIlraith and Tran Cao Son. Adapting Golog for Composition of Semantic Web Services. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR2002), 2002. [28] Peter Mika, Daniel Oberle, Aldo Gangemi, and Marta Sabou. Foundations for Service Ontologies: Aligning OWL-S to DOLCE. In WWW ’04: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 563–572, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM Press. [29] Srini Narayanan and Sheila A. McIlraith. Simulation, Verification and Automated Composition of Web Services. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW), 2002. [30] C. Pahl and M. Casey. Ontology Support for Web Servcie Processes. In ESES/FSE’03 September, pages 1–5. ACM, 2003. [31] Massimo Paolucci, Takahiro Kawamura, Terry R. Payne, and Katia Sycara. Semantic Matching of Web Services Capabilities. In Proceedings of the First International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), volume 2342 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 333–347. Springer-Verlag, 2002. [32] Massimo Paolucci, Onn Shehory, Katia P. Sycara, Dirk Kalp, and Anandeep Pannu. A Planning Component for RETSINA Agents. In ATAL ’99: 6th International Workshop on Intelligent Agents VI, Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL),, pages 147–161, London, UK, 2000. Springer-Verlag. [33] Peter F. Patel-Schneider and Dieter Fensel. Layering the Semantic Web: Problems and Directions. In Proceedings of the First International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), 2002. [34] Peter F. Patel-Schneider, Patrick Hayes, and Ian Horrocks. OWL Web Ontology Language Semantics and Abstract Syntax. Technical report, www.w3c.org, 2004. [35] Terry R. Payne, Rahul Singh, and Katia Sycara. Calendar Agents on the Semantic Web. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 17(3):84–86, 2002. [36] Joachim Peer. Bringing Togrther Semantic Web and Web Services. In Proceedings of the First International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), pages 279–291. Springverlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002, 2002. [37] Chris Preist, Javier Esplugas-Cuadrado, Steven A. Battle, Stephan Grimm, and Stuart K.Williams. Automated Business-to-Business Integration of A Logistics Supply Chain Using Semantic Web Services Technology. In ISWC 2005, pages 987–1001. Springer-Verlag, 2005. [38] Dumitru Roman, Uwe Keller, Holger Lausen, Jos de Bruijn, Rube’n Lara, Michael Stollberg, Axel Polleres, Cristina Feier, Christoph Bussler, and Dieter Fensel. Web Service Modeling Ontology (WSMO). Applied Ontology 1(2005), 2005. [39] Mithun Sheshagiri, Marie desJardins, and Tim Finin. A Planner for Composing Services Described in DAML-S. In Proceedings of the AAMAS Workshop on Web Services and Agent-based Engineering,, June 2003. [40] Mithun Sheshagiri, Marie desJardins, and Finin Timothy. A Planner for Composing Services Described in DAML-S. In Proceedings of the AAMAS’03 Workshop on Web Services and Agent-based Engineering, 2003. [41] Naveen Srinivasa, Massimo Paolucci, and Katia Sycara. Adding OWL-S to UDDI, implementation and throughput. 2004. [42] Katia Sycara, Massimo Paolucci, Anupriya Ankoleker, and Naveen Sirnivasan. Automated Discovery, Interaction and Composition of Semantic Web services. In Journal of Web Semantics, volume 1. [43] Paolo Traverso and Macro Pistore. Automated Composition of Semantic Web Services into Executable Processes. 2004. [44] Yih-Kuen Tsay, Po-Chun Chen, Chih-Hsiung Liu, and Jyun-Yang Syu. Ontology- Based Automation of Web Services Composition and Brokering. Unpublished Manuscript, 2004. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/31950 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 網路服務技術提供了一個分散式系統發展的架構,網路服務可以加以組裝形成一個完整的整合性服務,以滿足特定使用者的需求。然而如何自動的組裝網路服務形成一個客製化的服務組合將會是一項極具挑戰的任務。針對這項挑戰,我們提出了一個網路服務組合的方法,這個方法主要是運用語意網的知識本體和相關的自動推理技術來達成網路服務的搜尋、組合、和執行。
根據這個方法,我們應用在旅遊服務的組合,開發了一個旅行者的雛型系統,它是建構於Protégé知識庫系統上的應用程式,而其中知識庫中的知識本體主要由OWL本體論語言加以定義,而知識庫中的規則是由SWRL規則語言所加以描述。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | As the number and variety of Web Services continue to grow, we will soon be able
to compose several Web Services as a more sophisticated service that meets a particular user’s needs. However, how to achieve this automatically poses great challenges. The difficulty of automatic Web Services composition can mainly be attributed to the lack of semantic interoperability in current Web Services technologies. Consequently, there have been many ongoing efforts in applying Semantic Web technologies to Web Services. In this thesis, we attempt to investigate and improve a semantic-based approach to providing customized services by dynamically assembling existentWeb Services. We focus on the problem of combing Web Services that may be invoked independently without a particular order; this is to be contrasted with the usual kind of service composition where the data/control flow from one service to another is essential. In the semantic approach to service combination, the description of a Web service is envisioned to consist of two parts: one is the service interface described by WSDL, which contains the necessary information for invoking the service and the other is the service profile expressed using Web Ontology Language (OWL) based on Description Logics, which contains sematic information that characterizes the service, such as information of the service provider. From the service provider’s perspective, the service profile can be seen as the service advertisements. The service requestor describes his needs by postulating a service profile, referred to as the service requirement, which after decomposition (if necessary) is to be matched against available service advertisements. With service requirements and service advertisements described according to the same set of ontologies, the suitable services can be matched and combined automatically. One main improvement to the aforementioned semantic approach is an innovative method to complete service requirements. Through examining concept definition f the requirement, we will know the incomplete information and trigger events to ask the customer to complete the requirement. Besides, we adopt the Jess rule engine and the Racer DL reasoner to perform constraint checking to ensure the consistency of the knowledge base. In the ontology modeling aspect, although OWL includes a rich set of class constructs, it is very weak in what can be said about properties. We use SWRL (Semantic Web Rule Language) to complement the expressive power, particularly the role composition construct. To validate our approach, we design and implement a prototype service combination system for the tourism domain, called the Traveller, as a plugin application in the wellused Prot´eg´e system. The system aims to help a customer or a travel agent to discover, ii combine, and invoke the desired Web services for a trip. The customer can give the system his incomplete or even ambiguous trip requests. The system will check the request’s consistency, and help the customer complete his requirements. It then returns exactly or approximately matched services according to the customer’s requirements. Finally, the customer can make a decision to actually invoke the matched Web Services. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T03:25:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-95-R93725046-1.pdf: 1522539 bytes, checksum: 4cb8814bdce5c5b725930e47c1697fe1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 Motivation and Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.3 Thesis Outline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2 Related Work 5 2.1 OWL-S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.1.1 OWL-S Ontology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.1.2 OWL-S Related Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.2 The SATINE Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2.3 Web Service Modeling Ontology (WSMO) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.4 Web Service Modeling Framework (WSMF) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 2.5 Web Services Composition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 3 Preliminaries 16 3.1 Description Logics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 3.2 OWL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 3.3 Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 4 Service Combination 22 4.1 Service Combination Architecture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 4.1.1 Web Services Combination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 4.1.2 Service Profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 4.1.3 A Service Combination Architecture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 4.2 Ontology Modeling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 4.2.1 Tbox Modeling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 4.2.2 Applying Rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 4.3 Service Combination Mechanism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 4.4 Requirement Completion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 4.5 Constraints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 4.6 Service Composer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 4.6.1 Design of the Service Composer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 4.6.2 Architecture of the Service Composer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 5 The Traveller 45 5.1 System Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 5.2 Service Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 5.3 Implementation of the Prototype System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 5.4 Constraint Checking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 5.4.1 Time Constraints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 5.4.2 Budget Constraints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 5.4.3 Number Constraints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 5.5 Ontology design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 5.5.1 The Tourism domain ontologies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 5.5.2 The Accommodation Ontology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 5.5.3 The Advertisement Ontology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 5.5.4 The Requirement Ontology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 5.5.5 SWRL rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 6 Conclusion 72 6.1 Contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 6.2 Future Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 網路服務 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 描述邏輯 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 知識本體 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 知識本體語言 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 規則 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 語意網 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 服務組合 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Description Logic | en |
| dc.subject | Web Services | en |
| dc.subject | SWRL | en |
| dc.subject | Rules | en |
| dc.subject | OWL | en |
| dc.subject | Ontology | en |
| dc.subject | Service Composition | en |
| dc.subject | Semantic Web | en |
| dc.title | 旅行者─一個運用語意網技術的服務組合系統 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Traveller: A Service Combination System Based on Semantic Web Technology | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 94-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 莊裕澤,王柏堯 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 描述邏輯,知識本體,知識本體語言,規則,語意網,服務組合,網路服務, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Description Logic,Ontology,OWL,Rules,Semantic Web,Service Composition,SWRL,Web Services, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 81 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2006-07-29 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 資訊管理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 資訊管理學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-95-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.49 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
