請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/31859完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張上鎮 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ke-Kung Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳克恭 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T03:22:27Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2011-07-31 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2006-07-31 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2006-07-28 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | CNS 3000 (2001) 木材加壓注入腐處理方法。經濟部標準檢驗局。
CNS 6717 (2000) 木材防腐劑之性能基準及其試驗法。經濟部標準檢驗局。 王松永 (1998) 木材之天然耐朽性及其防止處理。林產工業17(1)：219-234。 王松永、丁昭義 (1982) 林產學。台北，台灣商務書局。第493-500頁。 池玉杰 (2003) 木材腐朽與木材腐朽菌。北京，科學出版社。第45-52頁。 卲力平、沈瑞祥、張素軒 (1984) 真菌分類學。北京，中國林業出版社。 林亞立 (2001) 木材保存在古蹟上的應用。http://www.forest.gov.tw. 林業試驗所 (2006) http://www.tfri.gov.tw. 吳志鴻 (1996) 鉻磷鹽類對麻竹竹青保綠效果之效果。國立台灣大學碩士論文。第8-12頁。 周慧明、金重為、尤紀雪編著 (1991) 木材防腐。北京，中國林業出版社。第23-69頁。 張上鎮 (2006) 防治木材生物劣化的施工與處理方法。第3-5頁。國立台灣大學森林環境暨資源學系，木材保存課程講義。 陳重仁譯 (2006) 永續經營白皮書。台北，積木文化。第214-217頁。 American Wood-Preserers’Association (2006) AWPA P-5, Wood Preservatives. AWPA Book of Standards. Granbury, Texas.U.S.A American Wood-Preserers’Association (2006) AWPA E7-01, Standard Method of Evaluaing Wood Preservatives by Field Test with Stakes. AWPA Book of Standards. Granbury, Texas.U.S.A. American Wood-Preserers’Association (2006) AWPA E14-01, Standard Method of Evaluaing Wood Preservatives in a Soil Bed. AWPA Book of Standards. Granbury, Texas.U.S.A. American Wood-Preserers’Association (2006) AWPA U1-05, Use Category System: User specification for treated wood. AWPA Book of Standards. Granbury, Texas.U.S.A ASTM (2005) D2017-05, Standard Test Method of Accelerated Laboratory Test of Natural Decay Resistance of Woods. ASTM book of Standards. U.S.A. Carruthers, P. (2001) International approval and use of copper azole based wood preservatives. 中華民國木質構造協會。新世紀木材防腐新趨勢研討會論文集。第28-35頁。 Clausen, C. and A. F. Green (2003) Oxalic acid overproduction by copper-tolerant brown-rot basidiomycets on southern yellow pine treated with copper-base preservatives. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 51:139-144. COST, Website:http://www.cost.esf.org. De Greet, R. C. and B.Woodward (1999) Using copper-tolerant fungi to biodegrade wood treated with copper-based preservatives. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 44: 17-27. EPA, United States Environmental Protection Agency (2006) Website: http:// yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress. European Standard (1992) EN 335?1, Hazard classes of wood and wood-based products against biological attack - Part 1: Classification of hazard classes. Evans, P. (2003) Emerging technologies in wood preservatives. For. Prod. J. 53(1): 14-20. Gisi, U., H. Binder, and E. Rimbach (1985) Synergistic interactions of fungicides with different modes of action. Trans. Br. Mycol Soc. 85:299-306. Greaves, H., C. W. Chin, and J. B. Watkins (1985) Improved PEC preservatives with added biocides. IRG/WP 13322. Greaves, H.(1972) Structural distribution of chemical components in preservative-treated wood by energy dispersion X-ray analysis. Material and Organismen 7(4):277-286. Griffin, D. H. (1994) Chapter 14 Fungicides. p.420. In Fungal Physiology, 2nd ed. Wiley-Liss, NY, USA. 458pp. Hale, M. D. C. and R. A. Eaton (1986) Soft rot cavity formation in five preservative-treated hardwood species. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 86: 585-589. Haygreen, J. G. and J. L. Bowyer (1996) Wood and water. pp.155-175. In Haygreen, J. G. and J. L. Bowyer, eds. Foresty Products and Wood Science. Iowa State University Press, USA. 484pp. Ishid H., T. Ito, and H. Mastusaki (2004) Why did Japan replace CCA by alternaives? I.R.G./ WP 04-50215. Johnson, B. R. and D. I. Gutzmer (1978) Ammoniacal copper borate: a new treatment for wood preservation. For. Prod. J. 28 (2): 33-36. Jones, P. C. T. and J. E. Mollison (1948) A technique for the quantitative estimation of soil microorganisms. J. Gen. Microbiol. 2: 54. Katz, S. A. and H. Salem (2005) Chemistry and toxicolgy of building timbers pressure-treated with chromated copper arsenate: a review. J. Appl. Toxicol. 25: 1-7. Murphy, R. J. (1994) Opportunities for innovation: a research Viewpoint. pp.162-165. In Wood Preservative in the ’90s and Beyond. Forest Products Society, Madison. 256pp. Nicholas, D. D. and K. J. Archer (1994) Soil beds for wood preservatives. pp.110-115. In Wood Preservative in the ’90s and Beyond. Forest Products Society, Madison. 256pp. Nicholas, D. D. and T. P. Schultz (1994) Biocides that have potential as wood preservatives. pp.169-173. In Wood Preservative in the ’90s and Beyond. Forest Products Society, Madison. 256pp. Painter, B. (2006) Accoya- A New Wood Specise. Abstracts of Wood Protection 2006”. Mar. 21-23, 2006, New Orleans, Louisina, USA. Pizzi, A. (1990) Chromium interactions in CCA/CCB wood preservatives. Part 2. Interactions with wood carbohydrates. Holzforschung 44: 373-380. Rayner, A. D. M. and L. Boddy (1988) pp.237-238, p.268, pp.449-451. In Fungal Decomposition of Wood：its biology and ecology. John Willey & Sons. 587pp. Schultz, T. P. and D. D. Nicholas (1994) Utilizing synergism to develop new wood preservatives. Conference paper of Wood Preservatives in the ‘90s and Beyond. Sept. 26-28, 1994 Savannah, Georgia. Ung, Y. T. and P. A. Cooper (2004) Effective of species, retention and conditioning temperature on copper stabilization and leaching for ACQ-D. A.I.G/ WP 04-30342. Vesentinei, D., D. J. Dickinson, and R. J. Murphy (2003) Effetcs of cyproconazole and copper sulphate on the length of the hyphal growth unit (HGU) of the white rot fungus Coriolus versicolor. Paper prepared for the A.I.G 34th annual meeting. 18-23 May 2003. Brisbane, Australia. Walker, L. E. (1994) Alkylammonium compounds as wood preservatives. pp. 220-229. In Wood Preservative in the ’90s and Beyond. Forest Products Society, Madison. 256pp. Wilcox, W. W. (1993) Future protection of wood in structures. pp.131-134. In Wood Preservative in the ’90s and Beyond, eds. Forest Products Society, Madison. 256pp. Zabel, R. A. and J. J. Morrell (1992) Natural decay resistance. pp. 400-411. In Zabel and J. J. Morrell, eds. Wood Microbiology: Decay and its Preservation. Academic Press, San Diego. 476pp. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/31859 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 人類利用木材為建築材料，已有很長久的歷史，然而木材在高溫、潮濕的環境下很容易產生各種生物性的危害，因此，為確保木材製品的功能性與延長使用年限，防腐處理有其必要性並且具有經濟價值。近年來，由於環保意識、法規等的改變，木材防腐藥劑研發，逐漸轉變為以少量金屬化合物混合合成殺菌劑（Biocide）的趨勢，以降低金屬化合物的使用劑量及對環境低衝擊性。本研究首先評估銅化合物及合成殺菌劑唑化合物（Azloes）與烷基銨化合物（Alkyl ammonium compounds）防腐劑對於木材真菌抑菌之效能，後續試驗則探討藥劑間加乘效應（Synergistic effect）。由篩選試驗選定硫酸銅、Tebuconazole與DDAC 進行固態平版試驗，得到藥劑對6株菌株的最低抑制濃度（MIC）、半數抑制濃度（IC50）數值，瞭解藥劑的抑菌能力與趨勢。硫酸銅水溶液因溶解性高，故對試驗菌株的抑菌效果佳；合成殺菌劑則以Cyproconazole與Tebuconazole的MIC值低，抑菌效果為最佳；DDAC的MIC濃度高，故抑菌效果不佳。 此外，本研究利用兩種藥劑混合進行抑菌試驗，期能產生加乘效應達到更好的抑菌效果、降低使用劑量或環境保護等效應。試驗結果顯示，高濃度硫酸銅與低濃度Tebuconazole混合配方，對G. trabeum與P. placenta 2株褐腐菌、T. versicolor白腐菌及T. harzianum黴菌的抑菌效果產生明顯加乘效應；而高濃度硫酸銅與低濃度DDAC混合配方則對P. placenta褐腐菌及T. harzianum黴菌的抑菌效果產生加乘效應。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Wood has been used for millennium as an important construction materail and known to be easily deteriorated by insects and fungi when used in the wet and/or high humility conditions. Treatments with proper preservatives generally increase the durability and service life of wood products. Because of changes in the environmental protection policies and public health concerns, tendency to research and develpoment of wood preservatives have dramatically changed in the last decade. Preservatives used today is toward the combination of biocides with metal compounds to reduce the dosage required and lessen the impact to the environment. In this study, three copper compounds (copper sulfate, copper carbonate, and copper oxide) and five biocides (DDAC and azoles such as azaconazole, cyproconazole, propiconazole, and tebuconazole) were tested against six wood-rotting fungi to understand their antifungal performance based on the values of MIC, IC50 and A.I.. The results indicated that copper sulfate, due to its relative high water solubility, had the most effective activity against fungi tested among the copper compounds. Among the biocides, cyproconazole and tebuconazole appeared to be the most effective reagents against fungi tested due to their lowest MIC values. Comparatively, the MIC values of DDCA were the highest. Experimental results from the combinations of copper sulfate with biocides showed that the mixture of higher concentration of copper sulfate with low concentration of tebuconazole exhibited synergistic inhibitiory effects against G. trabeum, P. placenta and T. versicolor, and that the mixture of relatively higher concentration of copper sulfate with low concentration of DDAC also had synergistic effects against P. placenta and T. harzianum mold fungi. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T03:22:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-95-P89625001-1.pdf: 381991 bytes, checksum: cc4d958dd2f8945c2fc966515e37bf90 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 頁次
目錄 .....................................................I 表目次 .................................................III 圖目次 ...................................................V 摘要 ....................................................VI Abstract ..............................................VIII 一、前言...................................................1 二、文獻回顧 .............................................3 （一）木材真菌 .......................................................3 1.木材真菌的種類 .........................................3 2.木材真菌與環境的關係 ...................................7 3.木材真菌的識別 ........................................10 （二）木材防腐劑發展與未來 ..............................14 （三）木材防腐劑成分組成 ................................18 1.金屬性木材防腐劑 ......................................18 2.非金屬性木材防腐劑 ....................................20 3.有機化合物木材防腐劑 ..................................20 （四）防腐劑成分對木材真菌抑菌機制 ......................23 （五）防腐劑對木材真菌抑制試驗 ..........................25 1.生長抑菌試驗 ......................................................25 2.防腐藥劑加乘效應 ......................................25 三、材料與方法 ......................................................28 （一）試驗材料 ..........................................28 1.試驗菌種 ..............................................28 2.試驗培養基 ............................................29 3.試驗藥劑 ......................................................29 （二）試驗方法 ..........................................31 1.篩選試驗 ..............................................31 2.單一藥劑對菌株抑菌試驗 ................................32 3.藥劑抑菌趨勢 ..........................................32 4.混合藥劑對菌株抑菌試驗 ................................33 四、結果與討論 ..........................................34 （一）藥劑篩選試驗 ......................................................34 1.銅化合物篩選結果 ......................................34 2.唑類化合物與烷基銨化合物篩選結果 ......................35 （二）抑菌試驗 ..........................................38 1.抑菌指數與濃度 ........................................38 2.藥劑抑菌趨勢 ..........................................40 （三）藥劑混合配方 ......................................48 1.硫酸銅與Tebuconazole混合配方 ..........................48 2.硫酸銅與DDAC混合配方 ..................................51 五、結論 ................................................53 六、參考文獻 ............................................55 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 木材防腐藥劑成分對木材真菌之抑制效能 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Inhibitory effects of wood preservative ingredients on the growth of wood fungi | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 94-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳金村,李鴻麟,王升陽,張惠婷 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 木材防腐,木材真菌,硫酸銅,合成殺菌劑,唑化合物,DDAC,加乘效應,抑菌指數, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Wood preservation,wood-rotting fungi,copper sulfate,biocides,azoles,DDAC,synergistic effect,anti-fungal index, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 59 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2006-07-30 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 森林環境暨資源學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 森林環境暨資源學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-95-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 373.04 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。