Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 農業化學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/31676
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor吳三和
dc.contributor.authorChen-Fang Wuen
dc.contributor.author吳承芳zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-13T03:17:19Z-
dc.date.available2006-08-01
dc.date.copyright2006-08-01
dc.date.issued2006
dc.date.submitted2006-07-28
dc.identifier.citation吳三和。1999。校園杜鵑花根系土壤理化性質調查報告。臺大校訊。國立臺灣大學。
吳三和。2002。臺中縣石岡鄉公所廚餘製作堆肥專案工作計畫期末報告。臺中縣石岡鄉公所。
吳三和、劉力學。2001。廚餘製作堆肥和其在有機農業上之應用。德國宏博基金會學術研討會。
何念祖、孟賜福。1987。植物營養學原理。上海科學出版社。上海,中國。
李窓明、李聯興、倪萬丁。1993。草苺新品種「桃園二號」育種研究。桃園區農業改良場研究彙報第13號。
李窓明、李聯興。1999。草苺桃園三號之育成。桃園區農業改良場研究彙報第39號。
張廣淼。2004。草苺健康管理。果菜健康管理研討會專集。財團法人全方位農業振興基金會。
鍾仁賜。草苺之土壤水分與營養管理。果菜健康管理研討會專集。財團法人全方位農業振興基金會。
藤原俊六郎、安西徹郎、加藤哲郎。1996。土壌診断の方法と活用,第100頁,社団法人 農山漁村文化協会。東京,日本。
Arimura, G., Ozawa, R., Shimoda, T., Nishioka, T., Boland, W., and Takabayashi, J. 2000. Herbivory-induced volatiles elicit defence genes in lima bean leaves. Nature, pp. 512-515.
Bray, R. H., and L. T. Kurtz. 1945. Determination of total, organic, and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Sci., 59: 39-45.
Bremner, J. M., and C. S. Mulvaney. 1982. Salicylic acid-thiosulfate modification on Kjeldahl method to include nitrate and nitrite. pp. 621-622. In “Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties” 2nd (ed.), A. L. Page (ed.). Academic Press, New York, USA.
Fitzptraick, G. E., E. R. Duke, and K. A. Klock-Moore. 1998. Use Compost Products for Ornamental Crop production: Research and Grower Experience. HortScience, 33 (6): 941-944.
Jones, J. B. Jr. 1998. Plant Nutrition Manual. CRC Press, New York, USA. Kabata-Pendias, A., and H. Pendias. 1984. Traces Elements in Soils and Plants. pp. 75-238. CRC Press, Inc., Raton, Florida, USA.
MacRae, R. J., and Mehuys, G. R. 1985. Effect of Organic Matter on Soil Physical Properties. In Advances in Soil Science; Stewart, B. A., Ed.; Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 73-79.
McLean, E. O. 1982. Soil pH and lime requirement. In “Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties” 2nd (ed.), A. L. Page (ed.). pp. 199-224. Academic Press, New York, USA.
Marschner, H. 1995. Mineral Nutrition in Higer Plants. Academic Press, New York, USA.
Maynard, A. A. 1995. Cumulative Effect of Annual Additions of MSW Compost on Yield of Field-Grown Tomatoes. Compost Sci. Utilization, 3 (2): 47-54.
Mehlich, A. 1985. Mehlich 3 soil test extractant: A modification of Mehlich 2 extractant. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 15: 1409-1416.
Murphy, J., and J. P. Riley. 1962. A modified single soluteion for determineation of phosphate in natural waters. Anal. Chem. Acta., 27: 31-36.
Nelson, D. W., and L. E. Sommers. 1982. Total Carbon; Organic Carbon, and Organic matter. In “Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties” 2nd (ed.), A. L. Page (ed.). pp. 539-579. Academic Press, New York, USA.
Parr, J. F., and G. B. Willson. 1980. Recycling Organic Wastes to Improve Soil Productivity. HortScience, 15: 162-166.
Rhoades, J. D. 1982. Soluble salts. In “Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties” 2nd (ed.), A. L. Page (ed.). pp. 167-179. Academic Press, New York, USA.
Roe, N. E. 1998. Compost Utilization for Vegetable and Fruit Crops. HortScience, 33 (6): 934-937.
Saied, A. S., A. J. Keutgen, and G. Noga. 2005. The Influence of NaCl Salinity on Growth and Fruit Quality of Strawberry cvs. ‘Elsanta’ and ‘Korona’. Scientia Horticulturae, 103: 289-300
Wang, S. Y., and S. S. Lin. 2002. Compost as Soil Supplement Enhanced Plant Growth and Fruit Quality of Strawberry. J. of Plant Nutrition, 25 (10): 2243-2259.
.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/31676-
dc.description.abstract本試驗使用草苺 (Fragaria ananassa Duch) 為材料,比較折衷農法與有機農法對其果實品質、養分吸收及栽培土壤的影響。折衷農法即基肥施用雞糞,追肥施用臺肥43號複合肥料;有機農法有二處理,一為施用廚餘堆肥,二為施用豌豆苗殘體堆肥。
消費者評鑑結果顯示廚餘堆肥處理 (Comp1) 所得果實最受好評,雞糞化肥處理 (CF) 者居次,豌豆苗殘體堆肥 (Comp2) 處理者殿後。果品分析之果實糖度 (雞糞化肥處理為10.4 °Brix,廚餘堆肥處理為10.1 °Brix,豌豆苗殘體堆肥處理為10.1 °Brix) 和可滴定酸測值 (雞糞化肥處理為0.62%,廚餘堆肥處理為0.6%,豌豆苗殘體堆肥處理為0.69%) 與消費者評鑑中受試者感受的甜酸有十分相近的結果。
由葉片與果實元素分析結果發現,第一次採樣三處理間葉片氮濃度差異不大,但果實氮濃度以CF處理者最高,達18.9 mg g-1,Comp1及Comp2處理者則約為13.1, 13.6 mg g-1。磷濃度方面,CF處理的葉片及果實磷濃度為三處理中最高,而消費者評鑑出氣味最芳香的果實亦為CF處理者。
健康葉片與受蟲害葉片元素分析結果顯示,受紅蜘蛛蟲害葉片之磷濃度為1.85 mg g-1,顯著低於健康葉片 (2.83-3.18 mg g-1)。此外,在折衷農法栽培之果實及葉片元素分析結果中發現其錳及鋅濃度分別為廚餘堆肥及豌豆苗殘體堆肥處理者之5倍及2倍。
土壤的pH值及比導電度皆因施用有機肥料而提高。有機碳含量也因有機肥的施用而大幅提高,其中施用廚餘堆肥者之有機碳含量在2003年1月21日採樣時達到1.13%,為三處理中最高者。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractTo elucidate the effect between the intermediate farming method and the organic farming method, Strawberry (Fragaria ananassa Duch) was used as material to analyze and compare the difference in three aspects: the fruit quality, nutrient concentrations of plants, and selected soil chemical properties.
The treatments are poultry litter plus chemical fertilizer (CF), table scraps compost (Comp1), and pea sprout waste compost (Comp2). A previous poll from consumers indicates that the fruits from the Comp1 treatment have the best quality and the highest evaluation. The value of the total sugar contents (CF is 10.4 °Brix, Comp1 is 10.1 °Brix, and Comp2 is 10.1 °Brix) and the total acidity (CF is 0.62%, Comp1 is 0.6%, and Comp2 is 0.69%) makes a good correlation with the consumers’ appreciation.
From the results of the leaf and the fruit nutrients analysis, the nitrogen concentration in the leaf has no difference between three treatments, but in the fruit, it is higher in the CF treatment than the other two. The investigation of the phosphorous concentration also shows that in the CF treatment, both the leaf and the fruit contain the most phosphorous in all treatments. The fruits from the CF treatment also get the best score in aroma from the consumer test. In addition, the manganese concentration in the leaf and the fruit from the intermediate farming is five times than the other two treatments. And the zinc concentration in the leaf from the intermediate farming is the double of the other two treatments.
On the other hand, the assay for the nutrients of the healthy leaf or the damaged leaf shows that the phosphorous concentration in the leaf suffering from spider mites is 1.85 mg g-1, and it is much lower than the concentration in the healthy leaf.
Finally, the pH and the conductivity of the soil increased because of using the organic fertilizer. Organic carbon content of the soil also increased just like the pH and the conductivity, and the organic carbon content from Comp1 treatment is 1.13% (sampling time is 2003/01/21), and it is the highest of all treatments.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T03:17:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-95-R91623413-1.pdf: 411030 bytes, checksum: a0c02b96c47a65dbea0a5f07f516d62d (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2006
en
dc.description.tableofcontents謝誌…………………………………………………………………………………I
摘要………………………………………………………………………………...II
Abstract..…………………………………………………………………………..IV
目錄………………………………………………………………………….…….VI
圖目錄…………………………………………………………………………...VIII
表目錄……………………………………………………………………………...X
附錄目錄……………………………………………………………………….….XI
I 前言……………………………………………………………………………….1
II 材料與方法……………………………………………………………………...4
II 1 材料…………………………………..……………………………………..4
II 2 方法……………………………………..…………………………………..5
III 結果與討論………………………………...………………………………….12
III 1 三種施肥處理對果實品質的影響………………………...……………..12
III 1-1 消費者評鑑結果…………………………………………...………...12
III 1-2 三種施肥處理對果實鮮重的影響………………………...………...12
III 1-3 三種施肥處理對果實糖度、可滴定酸的影響…………….……….13
III 2 三種施肥處理對果實及葉片中養分濃度的影響………………...……..15
III 2-1 三種施肥處理對果實及葉片中總氮濃度的影響……………...…...15
III 2-2 三種施肥處理對果實及葉片中磷濃度的影響………………...…...18
III 2-3 三種施肥處理對果實及葉片中鉀、鈣、鎂濃度的影響……….….20
III 2-4 三種施肥處理對果實及葉片中鐵、錳、銅、鋅濃度的影響……..26
III 2-5 紅蜘蛛蟲害………………………………………...……….………..27
III 3 三種施肥處理對土壤性質的影響…………………...………….……….28
III 3-1 三種施肥處理對土壤pH的影響…………...………………………28
III 3-2 三種施肥處理對土壤比導電度的影響……………...…….………..29
III 3-3 三種施肥處理對土壤有機碳含量和總氮量的影響……….……….30
III 3-4 三種施肥處理對土壤碳氮比的影響………………………....……..32
III 3-5 三種施肥處理對土壤Bray-1磷含量的影響………………...……..34
III 3-6 三種施肥處理對土壤Mehlich III可萃取性鉀、鈣、鎂的影響….35
III 3-7 三種施肥處理對土壤Mehlich III可萃取性鐵、錳、銅、鋅的影響…38
IV 結論……………………………………………………………………………41
V 參考文獻……………………………………………………………………….43
VI 附錄……………………………………………………………………………46
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject有機農法zh_TW
dc.subject折衷農法zh_TW
dc.subject草苺zh_TW
dc.subjectstrawberryen
dc.subjectorganic farmingen
dc.subjectintermediate farmingen
dc.title折衷農法與有機農法對草苺生長之影響zh_TW
dc.titleEffects of Intermediate Farming and Organic Farming on the Growth of Strawberryen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear94-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee廖乾華,羅秋雄
dc.subject.keyword有機農法,折衷農法,草苺,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordorganic farming,intermediate farming,strawberry,en
dc.relation.page50
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2006-07-30
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept農業化學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:農業化學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-95-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
401.4 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved