請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/31423
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 張顯達 | |
dc.contributor.author | Chi-hsin Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳紀昕 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T03:12:51Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2007-09-12 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2006-09-12 | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2006-09-06 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Baker, C. 2001. Foundation of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Bates, E., and MacWhinney, B. 1987. Competition, variation, and language learning. In B. MacWinney (Ed.), Mechanism of Language Acquisition. London: Lawrence Erlbaum. Beveridge, M. & Marsh, L. 1991. The influence of linguistic context on young children’s understanding of homophonic words. Journal of Child Language, 18, 459-467. Blank, A. 2003. Polysemy in the lexicon and in discourse. In B. Nerlich et al., (Eds), Polysemy: Flexible Patterns of Meaning in Mind and Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Boelte, J. and Coenen, E. 2002. Is phonological information mapped onto semantic information in a one-to-one manner? Brain and Language, 81, 384-397. Bowerman, M. 1982. Reorganizational processes in lexical and syntactic development. Language Acquisition: The State of the Art. London: Lawrence Erlbaum. Bowerman, M. 1987. Commentary: Mechanisms of language acquisition. In B. MacWinney (Ed.), Mechanism of Language Acquisition: The 20th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Buchanan, L., Westbury, C., and Burgess, C. 2001. Characterizing semantic space: Neighborhood effects in word recognition. Psycholinguistic Bulletin & Review, 8 (3), 531-544. Carroll, J. M. and Snowling, M. J. 2001. The effects of global similarity between stimuli on children’s judgment of rime and alliteration. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 327-342. Casenhiser, D. M. 2005. Children’s resistance to homonymy: an experimental study of pseudohomonyms. Journal of Child Language, 32, 319-343. Chen, C. 2006. The Effect of Phonological Form on Bilingual Children’s Object Classification. Poster presented at the Latsis Colloquium of the University of Geneva: Early Language Development and Disorders, Geneva, Switzerland. Clahsen, H., Aveledo, F., and Roca, I. 2002. The development of regular and irregular verb inflection in Spanish child language. Journal of Child Language, 29, 591-622. Clark, E. 1987. The principle of contrast: a constraint on acquisition. In B. MacWinney (Ed.), Mechanism of Language Acquisition: The 20th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Clark, E. 1988. On the logic of contrast. Journal of Child Language, 15, 317-335. Clark, E., Gelman, S. A., and Lane n. M. 1985. Compound nouns and category structure in young children. Child Development, 56, 84-94. Diesendruck, G. & Markson, L. 2001. Children’s avoidance of lexical overlap: a pragmatic account. Developmental Psychology, 37, 630-641. Doherty, M. 2004. Children’s difficulty in learning homonyms. Journal of Child Language, 31, 203-214. Gagne, C. L. and Spalding, T. L. 2004. Effect of relation availability on the interpretation and access of familiar noun-noun compounds. Brain and Language, 90, 478-486. Gaskell, M. G.. and Marslen-Wilson, W.D. 1999. Ambiguity, competition, and blending in spoken word recognition. Cognitive Science, 23 (4), 439-462. Huang, S. 1997. Chinese as a headless language in compounding morphology. In J. L. Packard, (Ed.), New Approaches to Chinese Word Formation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Hung, F. & Peters, A. 1997. The role of prosody in the acquisition of grammatical morphemes: evidence from two Chinese languages. Journal of Child Language, 24, 627-650. Ianco-Worrall, A. D. 1972. Bilingualism and cognitive development. Child Development, 43, 1390-1400. Jarvis, L. H., Merriman, W. E., Barnett, M., Hanba, J., and Van Haitsma, K. S. 2004. Input that contracts young children’s strategy for mapping novel words affects their phonological and semantic interpretation of other novel words. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing research, 47, 392-406. Johnson, E. K., Jusczyk, P.W., Cutler, A., and Norris, D. 2003. Lexical viability constraints on speech segmentation by infants. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 65-97. Karmiloff-Smith, A. 1979. A Functional Approach to Child Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Klepousniotou, E. 2002. The processing of lexical ambiguity: Homonymy and polysemy in the mental lexicon. Brain and Language, 81, 205-223. Krott, A., and Nicoladis, E. 2005. Large constituent families help children parse compounds. Journal of Child Language, 32, 139-158. Li, C. N. and Thompson, S. A. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Libben, G., Gibson, M., Yoon, Y. B., & Sandra, D. 2003. Compound feature: the role of transparency and morphological headedness. Brain and Language, 84, 50-64. MacWhinney, B. 2004. A multiple process solution to the logical problem of language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 31, 883-914. Maratsos, M. 1982. The child’s construction of grammatical categories. Language Acquisition: The State of the Art. London: Lawrence Erlbaum. Markman, E., & Wachtel, G.. 1988. Children’s use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 121-157. Mazzocco, M. 1997. Children’s interpretations of homonyms: a developmental study. Journal of Child Language, 24, 441-467. Mazzocco, M., Myers, G., Thompson, L., and Desai, S. 2003. Possible explanations for children’s literal interpretations of homonyms. Journal of Child Language, 30, 879-904. Nicoladis, E. 2002. The cues that children use in acquiring adjectival phrases and compound nouns: evidence from bilingual children. Brain and Language, 81, 635-648. Nicoladis, E. 2003. What compound nouns mean to preschool children. Brain and Language, 84, 38-49. Nicoladis, E., and Yin, H. 2002. The role of frequency in acquisition of English and Chinese compounds by bilingual children. In B. Skarabela, S. Fish, and A. H.-J. Do (Eds.), BUCLD 26 Proceedings. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. Nicoladis, E., and Murphy, V. A. 2004. Level-ordering does not constrain children’s ungrammatical compounds. Brain and Language, 90, 487-494. Packard, J. L. 1999. Lexical access in Chinese speech comprehension and production. Brain and Language, 68, 89-94. Peters, A. & Zaidel, E. 1980. The acquisition of homonymy. Cognition, 8, 187-207. Peters, A. 1985. Language segmentation: Operating principles for the perception and analysis of language. In D. Slobin (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition. Vol. 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pinker, S. 1984. Language Learnability and Language Development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Pinker, S. 1998. Words and rules. Lingua, 106, 219-242. Plunkett, K. 1993. Lexical segmentation and vocabulary growth in early language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 20, 43-60. Redington, M. and Chater, N. 1998. Connectionist and statistical approaches to language acquisition: A distributional perspective. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13 (2/3), 129-191. Rosch, E., and Mervis, C. B. 1975. Family resemblance: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573-605. Slobin, D. 1985. Crosslinguistic evidence for the language making capacity. In D. Slobin (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition. Vol. 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Tomasello, M. 2000a. First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 61-82. Tomasello, M. 2000b. Do young children have adult syntactic competence? Cognition, 74, 209-253. Tomasello, M. 2001. Perceiving Intentions an Learning Words in the Second Year of Life. In M. Tomasello & E. Bates (Eds.), Language Development: The Essential Readings. Oxford: Blackwell. Yates, M., Locker, L. JR., and Simpson, G. B. 2003. Semantic and phonological influences on the processing of words and pseudohomophones. Memory and Cognition, 31 (6), 856-866. Zhou, X. and Marslen-Wilson, W. 1995. Morphological structure in the Chinese mental lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10 (6), 545-600. Zhou, X. and Marslen-Wilson, W. 2000. Lexical representation of compound words: Cross-linguistic evidence. Psychologia, 43, 47-66. Zwitserlood, P. 2004. Sublexical and morphological information in speech processing. Brain and Language, 90, 368-377. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/31423 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 中文有兩大特性,第一,物體名稱通常為雙音節複合詞 (disyllabic compounds) ,第二,同音詞比例很高。屬於同一個類別 (category) 的物體,通常其名稱的第二個音節相同,因此,中文的同音詞素 (homophone) 在這種情況下對兒童物體分類可能具有正面的影響,即同音會促進兒童抽取出物體相似的特性或是功能上的相似性。中文另一項特點為同音詞是一個常見現象,不同種類的物體可能在名稱上會包含相同或相似的聲音,這個特性使兒童在學習時可能會把不同種類的東西誤認為同一類。從這兩個特性來看,中文的同音詞在詞彙學習上有優點也有缺點。本研究以兩個實驗來探討同音詞素對於兒童的詞彙分類究竟會不會產生影響。九十六位學齡前的幼童參與本研究,平均年齡分別為四歲及六歲。受試者必須判斷詞組內的詞是否屬於同一類。在第一個實驗中,物體名稱及類別名稱皆為真詞,受試者可以根據之前的經驗或是實驗時提供的圖片作為判斷依據。而在第二個實驗中,類別名稱皆為新詞 (novel words),受試者必須根據實驗者所提供的故事內容來判斷哪些物體屬於同一類。實驗材料可分為三種,第一種是類別不同語音也不同的詞組 (non-member with different form),第二種是類別不同語音相同 (non-member with same form),第三種是類別相同但語音不同的詞組 (member with different form)。結果發現,語音對於幼童詞彙分類有很大的影響。學齡前幼童(尤其是四歲組的幼童)確實傾向將名稱發音相似的物體當成同一類。另一方面,當兒童在學習新的類別,而此類別內部成員很少且名稱分歧時,孩童即減少使用語音作為分類的依據。此外,隨著年齡及經驗的增加,兒童會逐漸使用語義而非語音來做為詞彙分類的準則。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In Mandarin, names of objects are usually disyllabic compounds. Items belonging to a category often share a final syllable that is the same as the name of the category, which often serves as the head of a compound. Since words ending with the same syllable are likely to belong to the same category, one strategy that can be used in lexical organization is judgment by the phonological forms of words. Nevertheless, another feature of Mandarin is the frequency of homophones. Words belonging to different categories often end with identical syllables. Therefore, children may mistake items of different categories as belonging to the same one. Given that there are both advantages and disadvantages in employing homophones in categorization, the present study is designed to examine whether homophonic heads of compounds influence children’s lexical organization when they are required to group items according to their meanings or perceptual features.
Ninety-six Mandarin-speaking four- and six-year-old preschoolers participated in this study. With pictures provided, the participants were asked to judge whether certain pairs of objects belonged to the same category. There are three types of stimuli in this study, the NMDF (non-member with different final syllable), NMSF (non-member with same syllable), and MBDF (member with different syllable) types. In all three types of materials, the first item in a pair is a member of a category and shares the final syllable with the name of that category. However, the items presented as the second of the pairs in each of the three types are different. In the NMDF type of stimuli, the second item is a non-member of the category and its final syllable is different from that of the first item. The second item of a pair in the NMSF type of material is a non-member sharing the same final syllable with the first item. As to the MBDF type, the second item belongs to the same category as the first one but contains a different final syllable. The results showed that in addition to semantic knowledge, phonological form played an important role in children’s categorization. Homophonic morphemes were strong cues that lured children, especially the younger ones, to take items ending with the same syllable as belonging to the same category, even though visual cues (pictures) were provided. With increase of age and experience, children may find this phonology-driven strategy not always useful. They would gradually apply another more reliable strategy, the semantic one, in their judgment of category members. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T03:12:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-95-R92142011-1.pdf: 744759 bytes, checksum: 55efda2ebacec86255b33f19fa95c47f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgements ………………………………………………………………… i
English Abstract …………………………………………………………………… ii Chinese Abstract …………………………………………………………………… iii Table of Contents …………………………………………………………………… iv List of Tables ………………………………………………………………………... vi List of Figures …………………………………………………………...……….. vii Chapter 1 Introduction ………………………………………………….... 1 1.1 Background ……………………………………………………………….. 1 1.1.1 Characteristics of Chinese Words …………………………………… 1 1.1.2 Homophones in Acquisition …………………………………………. 2 1.1.3 Compounds in Mandarin ……………………………………………. 3 1.1.4 Acquisition of Morphology ………………………………………… 8 1.1.5 Competition Model and Chinese Compounds ……………………… 9 1.2 Goal of the Study ………………………………………….………...… 10 1.3 Organization ……………………………………………………………11 Chapter 2 Literature Review ………………………………………...….. 12 2.1 Form and Function Mapping …………………………………………….. 12 2.2 Formation of Morphological Paradigms ……………………………….. 14 2.3 Mental Representation of Compounds ………………………………… 16 2.4 Compounds in Acquisition ………………………………………….….. 19 2.5 Phonological Effects on Categorization …………………………….….. 20 Chapter 3 Experiment 1 – Real Category …………………………….. 23 3.1 Design and Materials ……………………………………………………. 23 3.1.1 Design of the Study ………………………………………………… 23 3.1.2 Materials ……………………………………………………………. 26 3.2 Participants and Procedure ….………………………………………… 30 3.2.1 Participants …………………………………………………………. 30 3.2.2 Experimental Procedure ……………………………………………. 30 3.2.3 Scoring of Truth Value Judgment Task …………………………….. 32 3.3 Results …………………………………………………………………… 32 3.3.1 Results of Truth Value Judgment Task – By-Item Analyses ……….. 33 3.3.2 Results of Truth Value Judgment Task – By-Subject Analyses ….…. 38 3.3.3 Results of Picture Selection Task ……………………………….….. 41 Chapter 4 Experiment 2 – Novel Category ………………….…………. 44 4.1 Methodology …………………………………………………………….. 44 4.1.1 Participants …………………………………………………………. 44 4.1.2 Materials ………………………………………………………….. 44 4.1.3 Procedure ……………………………………………………………46 4.2 Results …………………………………………………………………….48 4.2.1 Results of Truth Value Judgment Task – By-Item Analyses ………...48 4.2.2 Results of Truth Value Judgment Task – By-Subject Analyses ……..53 4.2.3 Results of Picture Selection Task ……………………………………56 Chapter 5 Comparison between Experiment 1 and Experiment 2 …..59 5.1 Comparison of Truth Value Judgment Tasks ……………………………..59 5.1.1 Same/Different Category Judgment ………………………………...59 5.1.2 Category Membership Judgment …………………………………....60 5.1.3 By-Subject Analyses ………………………………………………...62 5.2 Comparison of Picture Selection Tasks …………………………………...65 5.2.1 Response Types in Picture Selection Tasks ………………………….65 5.2.2 Response Types Used Consistently ………………………………….66 5.3 Relation between Truth Value Judgment and Picture Selection Task …….68 5.3.1 Performance in Truth Value Judgment Task by Children Using Consistent Response Type ………………………………………….68 5.3.2 Phonological Type of Response and Truth Value Judgment – Experiment 1 ……………………………………………………….70 5.3.3 Phonological Type of Response and Truth Value Judgment – Experiment 2 ………………………………………………………..73 Chapter 6 Discussion and Conclusion ………………………………….76 6.1 Summary ………………………………………………………………….76 6.2 Phonological Effects …………………………………………………….79 6.3 Semantic/ Contextual Information …...…………………………………...81 6.4 Compound Learning and Category Formation ……………………………82 6.5 Conclusion ………………………………………………………………. .83 References …………………………………………………………………………..85 Appendices ………………………………………………………………………….90 Appendix 1 Sets of Items Selected ………………………………………....90 Appendix 2 Children’s answers to TVJ questions ….……………………….91 Appendix 3 Stories and Instruction in Experiment 2 ………………………..92 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 同音詞素在詞彙分類的作用 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Effect of Homophones on Mandarin-speaking Children's Lexical Organization | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 94-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 曹峰銘,陳修元 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 同音詞,複合詞,詞彙分類,語言發展, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | homophone,compound,lexical organization,language development, | en |
dc.relation.page | 93 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2006-09-07 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 語言學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 語言學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-95-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 727.3 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。