請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/31004
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 孫岩章 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yen-Yu Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳彥宇 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T02:24:54Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2008-02-02 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2007-02-02 | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2007-01-29 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. 王亞男、姜家華、孫岩章、李鎮宇、余金益. (1997).木本樹種淨化臭氧與二氧化氮能力之評估(一).台大實驗林研究報告11(2):55-72.
2. 呂宜玲. (1997).植物對過氧硝酸乙烯酯的吸收及其反應.國立台灣大學植物病蟲害研究所論文. 3. 宋炯輝、王亞男、孫岩章、賀立行. (1998). 木本樹種淨化臭氧與二氧化氮能力之評估(三).台大實驗林研究報告12(4):269-288. 4. 李鎮宇、余金益、王亞男、姜家華、孫岩章、宋炯輝. (1997). 木本樹種淨化臭氧與二氧化氮能力之評估(二).台大實驗林研究報告11(4):31-47. 5. 陳彥志. (1995). 觀賞苗木對臭氧的吸收及其耐抗性研究. 國立台灣大學植物病蟲害研究所論文. 6. 陳彥志、孫岩章.(1999). 常見行道樹對臭氧之反應及抗耐性比較. 中國園藝學會九十一年論文摘要. 中國園藝 48(4):434-435 7. 陳勤仁. (1997).合板游離甲醛之研究.台北醫學院藥學研究所論文. 8. 曹慧嫻. (2001). 常見室內植物對甲醛之吸收及其反應. 國立台灣大學植物病理學研究所論文. 9. 孫岩章. (1984).空氣污染公害之鑑定技術及圖鑑. 行政院衛生署環境保護局編委會. 10. 孫岩章. (1993).綠色植物淨化空氣的機能.科學農業. 41(7,8):163-176 11. 孫岩章.(1999).利用空氣清淨生態系統裝置改善室內空氣品質的一種設計. 中華民國環境保護學會會誌22:131-141 12. 孫岩章. (2001).環境污染與公害鑑定. 科技圖書 13. 孫岩章. (2004).樹木淨化生物源揮發性有機物等空氣污染物評估計畫期末報告.行政院環保署科技計畫. 14. 孫岩章.(2005).常用樹木對淨化揮發性有機物等空氣污染物之評估計畫期末報告.行政院環境保護署. 15. 孫岩章.(2006).空氣品質淨化區主要六種樹種全年淨化空氣污染物總量評估計畫其中報告.行政院環保署科技計畫. 16. Abbritti, M. C. and Muzi, G. (1995). Indoor air quality and health effects in office buildings. In: Proceedings of Healthy Buildings `95, An International Conference on Healthy Buildings in a Mild Climate. (Maroni, M., Ed.). University of Milano and International Centre for Pesticide Safety, Milan, Italy, Vol. 1, 185-95. 17. ACGIH. (1995). Threshold limit values for chemical substance and physical agents and biological exposure indices. Cincinnati: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. 18. Agrawal M. and Deepak, S.S. (2003) Physiological and biochemical responses of two cultivars of wheat to elevated levels of CO2 and SO2, singly and in combination. Environ. Pollut. 121:189-197 19. Alderson, T. (1967). Induction of genetically recombinant chromosomes in the absence of induced mutation. Nature. 215:1281-1283 20. American Lung Association (2001). When you can't breathe, nothing else matters. Air Quality. www.lungusa.org/air/. 21. Amiro, B.D., Gillespie, T.J., and Thurtell, G.W. (1984). Injury response of Phaseolus vulgaris to ozone flux density. Atmosph. Environ. 18:1207-1215. 22. Anderson, I., Lundqvist, G. R., and Molhave, L. (1975). Indoor air pollution due to chipboard used as a construction material. Atmosph. Environ. 9:1121-1127 23. Apte M.G., Fisk W.J., Daisey J.M. (2000). Associations between indoor CO2 concentrations and sick building syndrome symptoms in U.S. office buildings: an analysis of the 1994-1996 BASE study data. Indoor Air. 10(4):246-257 24. ASHRAE. (1999). Ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality. Atlanta , GA, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE Standard 62-1999) 25. Atkinson, C.J., Winner, W.E., and Mooney, H.A. (1988). Gas exchange and sulfur dioxide fumigation studies with irrigated and unirrigated field grown Diplacus aurantiacus and Heteromeles arbutifolia. Oecologia (Berl). 75:386-393. 26. Bennett, J.H. and Hill, A.C. (1973). A model for gaseous pollutant sorption by leaves. J. Air Pollut. Contr. Assoc. 23:957-962 27. Black, V.J. and Unsworth, M.H. (1979). Resistance analysis of sulfur dioxide fluxes to Vicia faba. Nature. 282:68-69. 28. Chanet, R., Izard, C., and Moustacchi, E. (1975). Genetic effects of formaldehyde in yeast. I. Influence of the growth stages on killing and recombination. Mutation Research. 33:179-186 29. Colbeck, I., and Mackenzie, A.R. (1994). Air pollution by photochemical oxidants. Air quality monographs. Vol. 1. Elsevier . Amsterdam-London-New york-Tokyo 30. Cooper, P. (1979). Genetic effects of formaldehyde. Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 17(3):300-301 31. Cope, D.M. and Spedding, D.J. (1982). Hydrogen sulfide uptake by vegetation. Atmosph. Environ. 16:349-353 32. Dally, K.A., Hanrahan, L.P., Woodbury, M.A., and Kanarek, M.S. (1981). Formaldehyde exposure in nonoccupational environments. Arch. Environ. Health. 36(6):277-284 33. Deepak, S.S. and Agrawal M. (1999) Growth and yield responses of wheat plants to elevated levels of CO2 and SO2, singly and in combination. Environ. Pollut. 104:411-419 34. Dingle, P., Tapsell, P., and Hu, S. 2000. Reducing formaldehyde exposure in office environments using plants. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 64:302-308. 35. Elkiey, T., and Ormrod, D.P. (1980). Sorption of ozone and sulfur dioxide by Petunia leaves. Environ. Exper. Bot. 21:63-70 36. Elkiey, T. Ormrod, D.P., and Marie, B. (1982). Foliar sorption of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, and ozone by ornamental woody plants. HortScience. 17:358-360 37. Englesberg, E. (1951). The mutagenic action of formaldehyde in bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 63: 1-11 38. Farquhar, G. D., and Wong. S. C. (1984). An empirical model of stomatal conductance. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 11, 191-210 39. Fischman, M.L., 1997. Building-associated illnesses. In: LaDou, J. (Ed.), Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 2nd Edition. Appleton & Lange, Stanford, CA, pp. 726–732. 40. Fuentes, J.D. and Gillespie, T.J. (1992). A gas exchange system to study the effects of leaf surface wetness on the deposition of ozone. Atmosph. Environ. 26.1165-1173 41. Garsed, S.G. and Read, D.J. (1977). The uptake and metabolism of 35SO2 in plants of differing sensitivity to sulfur dioxide. Environ. Pollut. 13:173-186 42. Godish, T. and Rouch, J. (1986). Mitigation of residential formaldehyde contamination by indoor climate control. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 47(12): 792-797 43. Godish, T. and Guindon, C. (1989). An assessment of botanical air purification as a formaldehyde mitigation measure under dynamic laboratory chamber conditions. Environ. Pollut. 61: 13-20 44. Gorton, H.L., Williams, W.E., and Assmann, S.M. Circadian rhythms in stomatal responsiveness to red and blue light. 45. Grantz, D.A. (1990). Plant response to atmospheric humidity. Plant Cell Environ 13: 667-679 46. Health Canada. (1995). Exposure Guidelines for Residential Indoor Air Quality. Ottawa, Ontario, Health Canada. 47. Hill, A.C. (1971). Vegetation: A sink for atmospheric pollutants. J. Air pollut. Control Assoc. 21:341-346. 48. Hong Kong. (1999). Guidance Notes for the Management of Indoor Air Quality in Office and Public Places (Draft), Hong Kong. 49. Hutchinson, G.L.,Millington, R.J.,and Peters, D.B.(1972). Atmospheric ammonia: Absorption by plant leaves. Science. 175:771-772 50. IARC (1995) Formaldehyde: IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to human, wood dust and formaldehyde, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 62: 217–362. 51. Kondo, T., Hasegawa, K., and Uchida, R. (1995). Absorption of formaldehyde by Oleander ( Nerium indicum ). Environ. Sci. Technol. 29:2901-2903 52. Kull, O. and Moldau H. (1994). Absorption of ozone on Betula pendula roth leaf surface. Water Air Soil Pollut. 75:79-86. 53. Leuning, R., Neumann, H.N., and Thurtell, G.W. (1979). Ozone up take by corn (Zea mays L.): a general approach. Agricul. Meteor. 20:115-135 54. Lin, J.M. and Yao, Y.H. (1993). Formaldehyde in conventional homes in Taiwan. Environmental International. 19: 561-568 55. Martina, C., Ulrike, B.D., Christian, L., and Henrich, S. (1994). Detoxification of Formaldehyde by the Spider Plant ( Chlorophytum comosum ) and by Soybean ( Clycine max ) Cell-Suspension Cultures. Plant Physiol. 104: 1301-1309 56. Mclaughlin, S.B., and Taylor, G.E. (1981). Relative humidity: Important modifier of pollutant uptake by plants. Science. 211:167-169 57. Meidner H., Mansfield, T.A. (1968). The role of rhythms in stomatal behaviour. In Physiology of Stomata. McGraw-Hill, New York, 102-169 58. Moldau, H., Kull, O.,Sober, J., and Norby, R.J. (1991). Differential response of CO2 uptake parameters of soil and sand-grown Phaseolus vulgaris(L.)Plants to absorb ozone flux. Environ. Pollut. 74:251-261 59. Morison J.I.L. (1987). Intercellular CO2 concentration and stomatal response to CO2. In Zeiger,E., Farquhar, G.D., Cowan, I.R. eds, Stomatal Function. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 229-251 60. Nishioka, H. (1973). Lethal and mutagenic action of formaldehyde in Hcr+ and Hcr- strans of Escherichia Coli. Mutation Research. 17:261-265 61. Okano, K. and Totsuka, T. (1986). Absorption of nitrogen dioxide by sunflower plants grown at various levels of nitrate. New Phytol. 102:551-562 62. Olson, J.H. and Dossing, M. (1982). Formaldehyde induced symptoms in day care centers. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 43:366-370 63. Persily, A.K. (1997). Evaluating building IAQ and ventilation with indoor carbon dioxide. ASHRAE Transactions, 103(2): 193-204 64. Porter, L.K., Viets, F.G., Jr., and Hutchinson, G.L. (1972). Air containing nitrogen-15 ammonia: Foliar absorption by corn seedling. Science. 175:759-761 65. Porter, J.A.H. (1975). Acute respiratory distress following formalin inhalation. Lancent. 27;2(7935):603-604 66. Poverennyi, A.M., Siomin, Y.A. Saenko, A.S., and Sinzinis, B.I. (1975). Possible mechanisms of lethal and mutagenic action of formaldehyde. Mutation Research. 27:123-126 67. Rich, S., Waggoner, P.E., and Tomlinson, H. (1970). Ozone uptake by bean leaves. Science. 169:79-80. 68. Ritchie, I.M. and Lehnen, R.G. (1985). An analysis of formaldehyde concentration in mobile and conventional homes. J. Environ. Health. 47(6):300-305 69. Russell, A.G., McRae, G.J., and Cass, G.R. (1985). The dynamics of nitric acid production and the fate of nitrogen oxides. New Phytol. 103:199-206 70. Schmitz, H., Hilgers, U., and Weidner M. (2000). Assimilation and metabolism of formaldehyde by leaves appear unlikely to be of value for indoor air purification. New Phytol. 147,307-315 71. Schulze E.D., Turner N.C., Gollan T., and Shackel K.A. (1987). Stomatal responses to air humidity and soil drought. In Zeiger, E., Farquhar, G.D., Cowan, I.R. eds, Stomatal Function. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 311-321 72. Seppanen, O.A., Fisk, W.J., and Mendell, M.J. (1999). Association of Ventilation Rates and CO[sub2] Concentrations with Health and Other Responses in Commercial and Institutional Buildings. Indoor Air. 9(4): 226-252 73. Sharkey T.D., Ogawa T. (1987). Stomatal responses to light. In Zeiger, E., Farquhar, G.D., Cowan, I.R. eds, Stomatal Function. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 195-208 74. Spedding, D.J. (1969). Uptake of sulphur dioxide by barley leaves at low sulphur dioxide concentrations. Nature. 224:1229-1230 75. Srivastana, H.S., Jolliffe, P.A. and Runeckles, V.C. (1975). Inhibition of gas exchange in bean leaves by NO2. Can. J. Bot. 53:466-474 76. Standards Australia (1991) The Use of Mechanical Ventilation and Air-conditioning in Buildings, Part 2 Mechanical Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality, Sydney, Standards Australia. 77. Sun, E.J. and Su, H.J. (1985).Fluoride injury to rice plants caused by air pollution emitted from ceramic and brick factories. Environ. Pollut. (A)37: 335-342 78. Sun, E.J. (1990). Sorption of three major air pollutants by bean plants. Journal of the Environmental protection society of the Republic of China. 13(1):39-50 79. Tayler, G.E. and Tingey, D.T. (1983). Sulfur dioxide flux into leaves of Geranium carolinianum L. Plant Physiol. 72:237-244 80. Thomas, M.D. and Hill, G.R. (1935). Absorption of sulphur dioxide by alfalfa and leaf injury. Plant Physiol. 10:291-307 81. Unsworth, M.H., Heagle, A.S., and Heck,W.W. (1984). Gas exchange in open-top field chambers-II. Resistance to ozone uptake by soybeans. Atmosph. Environ. 18:381-385 82. Van Hove, L.W.A., Adema, E.H., Vredenberg, W.J.,and Pieters,G.A. (1989). A study of the adsorption of NH3 and SO2 on leaf surfaces. Atmosph. Environ. 23:1479-1486 83. Van Hove, L.W.A., Vredenberg, W.J., and Adema, E.H. (1990). The effect of wind velocity, air temperature and humidity on NH3 and SO2 transfer into bean leaves (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.). Atmosph. Environ. 24:1263-1270 84. Wesely, M.L. and Hicks, B.B. (1977). Some factors that affect the deposition rates of sulfur dioxide and similar gases on vegetation. J. Air Pollut. Contr. Assoc. 27:1110-1116 85. Whitehead, D.C. and Lockyer D.R. (1987). The influence of the concentration of gaseous ammonia on it’s uptake by leaves of Italian ryegrass, with and without an adequate supply of nitrogen to the roots. J. Exp. Bot. 38:818-827 86. WHO. (1999). Air Quality Guidelines for Europe, Geneva. World Health Organization. 87. Wilkins, R.J. and Macleod, H.D. (1976). Formaldehyde induced DNA-protein crosslinks in Escherichia coli. Mutation Research.36:11-16 88. Wolkoff, P. (1998). Impact of air velocity, temperature, humidity, and air on long-term VOC emissions from building products. Atmosph. Environ. 32:2659-2668 89. Wood, R. A., Orwell, R. L., Tarran, J., Torpy, F., and Burchett, M. 2002. Potted-plant/growth media interactions and capacities for removal of volatiles from indoor air. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology 77 (1): 120-129. 90. Wu, P.C., Li, Y.Y., Lee, C.C., Chiang, C.M., Su, H.J. J. (2003). Risk assessment of formaldehyde in typical office buildings in Taiwan. Indoor Air 13:359-363 91. Zeiger, E.(1990). Light perception in guard cells. Plant Cell Environ. 13:739-747 92. Zhang, J., He, Q.,and Lioy, P.J. (1994). Characteristics of aldehydes: concentrations, sources, and exposures for indoor and outdoor residential microenvironments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 28:146-152 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/31004 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 甲醛及二氧化碳為兩大室內空氣污染物,此研究目的在於篩選出吸收甲醛及二氧化碳能力較佳的植物,並且建立出一套利用室內植物淨化污染之最佳策略。
本研究乃利用一小型密閉式熏氣系統,針對不同室內植物盆栽,測試個別植物種類間對1 ppm甲醛及1000 ppm二氧化碳之吸收能力強弱之差異。研究結果顯示,黃邊短葉虎尾蘭及美鐵芋吸收甲醛之效率最高,沈降速度最高分別可達0.77、0.73mm/s;鐵線蕨、黛粉葉、馬拉巴栗對二氧化碳之吸收率較佳,沈降速度最高約在0.15∼0.17mm/s間。而植物對二氧化碳沈降速度低於對甲醛之沈降速度,其原因推測可能為所使用之二氧化碳濃度過高導致氣孔關閉,使二氧化碳無法繼續經氣孔擴散進入植物體所致。 進一步利用此一熏氣系統,比較各種植物於500、5000 Lux兩種光強度下對甲醛及二氧化碳吸附能力之之差異,於上午、下午及晚間之試驗顯示,強光分別可提升沈降速度42%∼148%、4%~122%、7%∼1098%。植物對二氧化碳之吸收也呈現相同趨勢,於上午、下午及晚間之實驗顯示,強光分別可提升沈降速度至13%∼367%、22%∼686%、20%∼2543%。表示光度越強,植物對甲醛及二氧化碳之吸收越高,且其提升程度依植物種類不同而有不同。 比較植物於上午、下午及晚間對甲醛及二氧化碳吸收之差異顯示,大部分植物對甲醛及二氧化碳之沈降速度由早至晚持續下降,其原因可能由於生物時鐘調控氣孔開關所致。而給予夜間額外光照,似乎可調整部分植物此一生物時鐘調控,提升其吸收力。 綜合本實驗各項結果,證實綠色植物對甲醛及二氧化碳具有吸收能力,其吸收力依植物種類而有差異,且與光照強度呈正相關。因此實際應用植物淨化室內甲醛及二氧化碳時,除需提供額外之光照,並且應留意環境中二氧化碳濃度,以達植物淨污之最高效能。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T02:24:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-R93633022-1.pdf: 1219451 bytes, checksum: b557fd3617088cd6d9ca4616b3778d31 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書………………………………………………………………...… i
誌謝…………………………………………………………………………..……… ii 中文摘要………………………………………………………………….………… iii 英文摘要………………………………………………………………….…………... iv 第一章 緒論(Introduction)…………………………………………………………………………1 第二章 前人研究(Literature Review)………………………………………………3 一、甲醛之特性與來源……………………………………………………………3 二、甲醛對人體之影響……………………………………………………………4 三、二氧化碳之特性與影響…………………………………………………… 5 四、利用植物淨化空氣污染……………………………………………………… 5 第三章 材料與方法(Materials and Methods)………………………………………9 一、供試植物………………………………………………………………………9 (一)供試植物之介紹……………………………………………………………9 (二)供試植物之栽培與管理……………………………………………………13 二、十四種植物吸收甲醛之測試……………………………………………… 14 (一)熏氣系統之設計………………………………………………………… 14 1.熏氣箱設備設計………………………………………………………… 14 2.產氣設備設計…………………………………………………………… 14 3.監測設備………………………………………………………………… 15 (二)量測方法與測試理論…………………………………………………… 15 1.量測方法及流程……………………………………………………… 15 2.測試理論……………………………………………………………… 15 三、十四種植物吸二氧化碳之測試………………………………………… 16 (一)熏氣系統之設計………………………………………………………… 17 1.熏氣箱設備設計………………………………………………………… 17 2.產氣設備設計…………………………………………………………… 17 3.監測設備………………………………………………………………… 17 (二)量測方法與測試理論…………………………………………………… 17 四、不同光度對植物吸收甲醛效率之影響…………………………………… 18 五、不同光度對植物吸收二氧化碳效率之影響……………………………… 18 六、植物吸收甲醛之晝夜變化………………………………………………… 18 七、植物吸收二氧化碳之晝夜變化…………………………………………… 19 第四章 結果(Results)………………………………………………………………23 一、十四種植物吸收甲醛之效率……………………………………………… 23 二、十四種植物吸收二氧化碳之效率………………………………………… 27 三、不同光度對植物吸收甲醛效率之影響…………………………………… 31 四、不同光度對植物吸收二氧化碳效率之影響……………………………… 35 五、植物吸收甲醛之晝夜變化………………………………………………… 39 六、植物吸收二氧化碳之晝夜變化…………………………………………… 47 第五章 討論(Discussion)……………………………………………………… 55 一、十四種植物吸收甲醛之效率……………………………………………… 55 二、十四種植物吸收二氧化碳之效率………………………………………… 56 三、不同光度對植物吸收甲醛效率之影響…………………………………… 57 四、不同光度對植物吸收二氧化碳效率之影響……………………………… 57 五、植物吸收甲醛之晝夜變化………………………………………………… 58 六、植物吸收二氧化碳之晝夜變化…………………………………………… 58 七、利用植物淨化室內甲醛及二氧化碳之策略探討………………………… 59 參考文獻(References)……………………………………………………………… 60 附錄…………………………………………………………………………………… 69 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 常見室內植物對甲醛及二氧化碳之吸收及反應 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Uptake of formaldehyde and carbon dioxide by indoor plants and their response to these pollutants | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 95-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王亞男,葉德銘,詹長權 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 二氧化碳,甲醛,沈降速度,植物淨污, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Carbon dioxide,formaldehyde,deposition velocity,phytoremediation, | en |
dc.relation.page | 78 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2007-01-30 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 植物病理與微生物學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 植物病理與微生物學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-96-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.19 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。