請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/30751完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 莊錦農 | |
| dc.contributor.author | I-Ju Maximilian Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳奕儒 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T02:14:28Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2007-07-16 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2007-07-16 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2007-05-10 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Abdelal, R., Y. Herrera, A. Johnston, and R. McDermott. 2005. Identity as a Variable. Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University. http://www.wcfia.harvard.edu/misc/initiative/identity/publications/ID050722.pdf
Adelson, L. 1997. “Migrants’ Literature or German Literature?” In Writing New Iden-tities, ed. G. Brinker-Gabler and S. Smith. Minneapolis: The University of Min-nesota Press, 216-229. Akaha, T. 2002. “Non-traditional Security Issues in Northeast Asia and Prospects for International Cooperation.” Paper presented at the “Thinking Outside the Secu-rity Box: Non-traditional Security in Asia: Governance, Globalization, and the Environment,” United Nations University Seminar, March 15, at United Nations, New York. Allison, G. and Philip Z. 1999. Essence of Decision: Exploring the Cuban Missile Crisis. New York: Addison Wesley Longman. Althusser, L. 1965. For Marx. London: Verso Press. Anderson, B. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Revised ed. London: Verso Press. Anderson, B.著，吳叡人譯，1999，《想像的共同體：民族主義的起源與散布》，臺北：時報文化。譯自Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Revised ed. London: Verso Press. 1991. Assmann, P. 1993. Arbeit am Nationalen Gedächtnis. Eine Kurze Geschichte der Deutschen Beildungsidee. Frankfurt am Main: Campus. Bade, K. 1992. “Politik in der Einwanderungssituation: Migration, Integration, Minderheiten.” In Deutsche im Ausland—Fremde in Deutschland: Migration in Geschichte und Gegenwart, ed. K. Bade. München: C. H. Beck. Bade, K. and M. Weiner. 1997. Migration Past, Migration Future: Germany and the United States. Providence, RH: Berghahn Books. Bahdad, A. 1997. “Nationalism and Immigration to the United States.” Diaspora 6(2): 155-177. Barthes, R. 1975. The Pleasure of the Text. New York: Hill and Wang. Bausinger, H. 2000. Typisch Deutsch: Wie Deutsch sind die Deutschen? München: C. H. Beck. BBC News. 2000. German Racist Killers Jailed. 30 August. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/903185.stm Beck-Gernsheim, E. 1999. Juden, Deutsche und Andere Erinnerungslandschaften. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Berger, P. 1983. “On the Obsolescence of the Concept of Honor.” In Revisions: Changing Perspectives in Moral Philosophy, ed. S. Hauerwas and A. MacIntyre. Notre Dame, IL: University of Notre Dame Press. Berger, P.編，黃樹仁、劉雅靈譯，1986，《社會學導引：人文取向的透視》，臺北：巨流。譯自Invitation to Sociology: A Humanistic Perspective. New York: An-chor. 1963. Berliner Morgenpost. 2006. Gewalt Eskaliert: Berliner Schule unter Polizeischutz. http://www.morgenpost.de/content/2006/03/31/berlin/820327.html Brinker-Gabler, G. 1997. “Exile, Immigrant, Re/Unified: Writing (East) Postunifica-tion Identity in Germany.” In Writing New Identities, ed. G. Brinker-Gabler and S. Smith. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press, 264-292. Brubaker, R., ed. 1989. Immigration and the Politics of Citizenship in Europe and America. Lanham, MD: University Press of America. Brubaker, R. 1990. “Immigration, Citizenship, and the Nation-State in France and Germany: A Comparative Historical Analysis.” International Sociology 5: 379-407. Brubaker, R. 1992. Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Brubaker, R. and F. Cooper. 2000. “Beyond ‘Identity.’” Theory and Society 29(1): 1-47. Buzan, B., O. Wæver and J. de Wilde著，2003，《新安全論》，杭州：浙江人民。譯自Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner. 1997. Campbell, D. 1998. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press. Castles, S. 1985. “The Guests Who Stayed—the Debate on ‘Foreigners Policy’ in the German Federal Republic.” International Migration Review 19(3): 517-34. Chilton, P. and C. Schäffner. 2002. “Introduction: Themes and principles in the analy-sis of political discourse.” In Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse, ed. P. Chilton and C. Schäffner. Amsterdam: John Benja-mins, 1-41. Cohen, J. 1985. “Strategy or Identity: New Theoretical Paradigms and Contemporary Social Movements.” Social Research 52(4): 663-716. Collins, P. 1990. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Poli-tics of Empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman. Connor, W. 1994. Ethnonationalism: The Quest for Understanding. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. CSU. 2000. Zehn Leitlinien für eine Gesetzliche Regelung zur Zuwanderung. Berlin: CSU. Derrida, J.著，張寧譯，2004，《書寫與差異》，臺北：麥田。譯自L’écriture et la différence. Paris: Editions du Seuil. 1967. Deutsche Welle World. 2004. No Breakthrough Yet on Immigration Law: Multicul-tural Germany, Like It or Not. 9 March. http://www.dw-world.de/popups/popup_printcontent/0,,1135921,00.html Easton, D. 1965. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley. Edmonds, D. and J. Eidinow著，曾佳琦譯，2005，《維根斯坦的撥火棒》，臺北：時報文化。譯自Wittgenstein’s Poker. The Story of a Ten-minute Argument Be-tween Two Great Philosophers. München: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt. 2001. Elster, J. 2000. “Arguing and Bargaining in Two Constituent Assemblies.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 2: 345. Erikson, E. 1963. Childhood and Society. New York: W.W. Norton. Erikson, E. 1968. Identity: Youth and Crisis. New York: W.W. Norton. Ette, A. 2003. “Politische Ideen und Policy-Wandel: die ‘Green Card’.” In IMIS-Beiträge 22: Themenheft: Die Deutsche Green Card. Migration von Hochqualifizierten in Theoretischer und Empirischer Perspektive, ed. U. Hunger and H. Kolb. Osnabrück, Germany: Institut für Migrationsforschung und Interkulturelle Studien der Universität Osnabrück, 39-50. Foucault, M. 1984. “The Order of Discourse.” In Language and Politics, ed. M. Shapiro. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Foucault, M.著，王德威譯，1993，《知識的考掘》，臺北：麥田。譯自L’archéologie du savoir. Paris: Éditions Gallimard. 1969. Geddes, A. 2003. The Politics of Migration and Immigration in Europe. London: Sage. Gellner, E. 1983. Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Giesen, B. 1993. Die Intellektuellen und die Nation: Eine deutsche Achsenzeit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Giesen, B. 1999. Kollektive Identität: Die Intellektuellen und die Nation 2. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Giraud, M. 2000. “Cultural Identity and Migrations.” In Politics of Identity, ed. R. Hudson and F. Réno. London: Macmillan, 61-82. Gleason, P. 1983. “Identifying Identity: A Semantic History.” Journal of American History 69(4): 910-931. Goh, E. 2004. China in the Mekong River Basin: The Regional Security Implications of Resource Development of the Lancang Jiang. Singapore: Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies. Gould, R. 1995. Insurgent Identities: Class, Community and Protest in Paris from 1848 to the Commune. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Green, S. 2000. “Beyond Ethno-culturalism? German Citizenship in the New Millen-nium.” German Politics 9(3): 105-124. Guiraudon, V. 1998. “Citizenship Rights for Non-Citizens: France, Germany and the Netherlands.” In Challenge to the Nation State, ed. C. Joppke. Oxford: Oxford Universtiy Press, 277-318. Habermas, J. 1981. Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns. 2 Vols. Frankfurt am Main: Shurkamp. Habermas, J. 1991. Staatsbürgerschaft und Nationale Identität: Überlegungen zur Europäischen Zukunft. St. Gallen, Switzerland: Erker-Galerie. Habermas, J. 1994. “Struggles for Recognition in the Democratic Constitutional State.” In Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition, ed. A. Gut-man and C. Taylor. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 107-148. Habermas, J. 1995. Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics. Oxford: Polity Press. Habermas, J. 1997a. Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des democratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt am Main: Shurkamp. Habermas, J. 1997b. A Berlin Republic: Writings on Germany. Trans. S. Rendall. Lincoln: The University of Nebraska Press. Habermas, J.著，曹衛東譯，2002，《後民族結構》，上海：人民。譯自Die Postnationale Konstellation: Politische Essays. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. 1998. Hagedorn, H. 2001. “Republicanism and the Politics of Citizenship: in Germany and France: Convergence or Divergence?” German Policy Studies 1(3): 243-272. Hall, S. 1996a. “Introduction: Who Needs ‘Identitiy?’” In Questions of Cultural Iden-titiy, ed. S. Hall and P. du Gay. London: Sage. Hall, S. 1996b. “Ethnicity: Identity and Difference.” In Becoming National, ed. G. Eley and R. Suny. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Halperin, M. and A. Kanter. 1985. “The Bureaucratic Perspective.” In International Politics: Anarchy, Force, Political Economy, and Decision-Making, ed. R. Art and R. Jervis. Boston: Little, Brown and Co. Hammer, T. 1986. “Citizenship: Membership of a Nation and of a State.” Interna-tional Migration 24: 735-747. Hammer, T. 1990. International Migration, Citizenship, and Democracy. Aldershot: Gower. Harré, R. 1984. Personal Being: A Theory for Individual Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Hell, M. 2005. Einwanderungsland Deutschland? Die Zuwanderungsdiskussion 1998-2002. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Hellmann, G. 1996. “Goodbye Bismarck? The Foreign Policy of Contemporary Germany.” Mershon International Studies 40(1): 1-40. Henderson, D. 2006. “German Economic ‘Miracle.’” The Concise Encyclopaedia of Economics. http://www.econlib.org/library/enc/GermanEconomicMiracle.html Herder von, J. 1964. Vom Erkennen und Empfinden der Menschlichen Seele. Berlin: Volksverlag. Hogwood, P. 2000. “Citizenship Controversies in Germany: The Twin Legacy of Völkisch Nationalism and the Alleinvertretungsanspruch.” German Politics 9(3): 125-144. Holzinger, K. 2001a. “Verhandeln statt Argumentieren oder Verhandeln durch Argumentieren? Eine Empirische Analyse auf der Basis der Sprechakttheorie.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 42(3): 414-446. Holzinger, K. 2001b. “Kommunikationsmodi und Handlungstypen in den Internationalen Beziehungen.” Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 8(2): 243-286. Howarth, D. and Y. Stavrakakis. 2000. “Introducing Discourse Theory and Political Analysis.” In Discourse Theory and Political Analysis, ed. D. Howarth, A. Nor-val, and Y. Stavrakakis. New York: Manchester University Press, 1-23. Hudson, R. and F. Réno. 2000. “Introduction: Politics of Identity – Migrants and Mi-norities in Multicultural States.” In Politics of Identity, ed. R. Hudson and F. Réno. London: Macmillan, xv-xvii. Hunger, U. 2001. “Party Competition and Inclusion of Immigrants in Germany.” German Policy Studies 1(3): 302-330. Huntington, S. 1993. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster. Huntington, S. 2004. Who Are We? The Challenges to America’s National Identity. New York: Simon & Schuster. Huysmans, J. 2000. “European Identity and Migration Policies.” In Constructing Europe’s Identity, ed. L. Cederman. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner. Iggers, G. 1983. The German Conception of History: The National Tradition of His-torical Thought from Herder to the Present. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan Univer-sity Press. Isaacs, H. 1975. Idols of the Tribe: Group Identity and Political Change. New York: Harper & Row. Joffe, J. 2000. “How Is My ‘Leitkultur’ Doing?” Die Zeit 45/2000, http://www.zeit.de/archiv/2000/45/200044_josefjoffe_1103.xml?page=all Joppke, C. 1999. “How Immigration Is Changing Citizenship.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 22(4): 629-652. Jordan, G. and C. Weedon. 1995. Cultural Politics: Class, Gender, Race and the Postmodern World. Oxford: Blackwell. Kastoryano, R. 2002. Negotiating Identities: States and Immigrants in France and Germany. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Katzenstein, P., ed. 1997. Tamed Power: Germany in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Klopp, B. 2002. German Multiculturalism: Immigrant Integration and the Transfor-mation of Citizenship. Westport, CT: Praeger. Koopmans, R. and P. Statham, ed. 2000. Challenging Immigration and Ethnic Rela-tions Politics: Comparative European Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Laclau, E. and C. Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso Press. Laclau, E. 1994. “Introduction.” In The Making of Political Identities, ed. E. Laclau. London: Verso Press, 1-8. Laitin, D. 1998. Identity in Formation: The Russian-Speaking Populations in the Near Abroad. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Laitin, D. 2006. Nations and 21st Century States. 國立臺灣大學政治學系網頁，http://politics.soc.ntu.edu.tw/lecture/Laitin-en.pdf Larsen, H. 1997. Foreign Policy and Discourse Analysis: France, Britain and Europe. London: Routledge. Lasswell, H. 1951. “The Policy Orientation.” In The Policy Sciences: Recent Devel-opments in Scope and Method, ed. H. Lasswell and D. Lerner. Stanford: Stan-ford University Press. Lasswell, H. and D. Lerner. 1951. The Policy Sciences: Recent Developments in Scope and Method. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Leicht, R. 2000. “Leitkultur? Absolut! Oder Relativ...” Die Zeit 45/2000, http://www.zeit.de/archiv/2000/45/200045_robertleicht_1103.xml Levi, A. & G. Whyte. 1997. “A Cross-Cultural Exploration of the Reference Depend-ence of Crucial Group Decisions under Risk.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41(6): 792-813. Levy, D. and N. Sznaider. 2001. Erinnerung im Globalen Zeitalter: Der Holocaust. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Lose, L. 1998. “Communicative Action and the Social Construction of Diplomatic Societies: Communication and Behavior in the Real World.” Paper presented at the Femmoller Workshop, 24-28 June. Lummer, H. 1999. Deutschland Soll Deutsch Bleiben. Kein Einwanderungsland, Kein Doppelpaß, Kein Bodenrecht. Tübingen, Germany: Hohenrain. Martin, P. 1994. “Germany: Reluctant Land of Immigration.” In Controlling Immigration: A Global Perspective, ed. W. Conelius et al. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 221-253. Maier, C. 1988. The Unmasterable Past: History, Holocaust, and German National Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Mearsheimer, J. 1995a. “The False Promise of International Institutions.” Interna-tional Security 19(3): 5-49. Mearsheimer, J. 1995b. “A Realist Reply.” International Security 20(1): 82-93. Meier-Braun, K. 2002. Deutschland, Einwanderungsland. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Meimeth, M. and J. Schild. 2002. Die Zukunft von Nationalstaaten in der Europäischen Integration: Deutsche und Französische Perspektiven. Opladen, Germany: Leske+Budrich. Meinecke, F. 1962. Weltbürgertum und Nationalstaat. München: Oldenburg. Melucci, A. 1989. Normads of the Present. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Melucci, A. 1995. “The Process of Collective Identity.” In Social Movement and Cul-ture, ed. H. Johnston and B. Klandermans. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press. Misselwitz, I. 2005. “German Reunification: A Quasi Ethnic Conflict.” Mind and Human Interaction. 13(1): 77-86. Morris, L. 2002. Managing Migration: Civic Stratification and Migrants’ Rights. London: Routledge. Motte, J., R. Ohliger, and A. von Oswald. 1999. 50 Jahre Bundesrepublik, 50 Jahre Einwanderung. Nachkriegsgeschichte als Migrationsgeschichte. Frankfurt am Main: Campus. Nipperdey, T. 1998. Deutsche Geschichte 1800-1918: Arbeitswelt und Bürgergeist, Machtstaat vor der Demokratie. München: C. H. Beck. Norton, A. 1988. Reflections on Political Identity. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press. Park, E. 2003. Citizenship Policy Reform in Germany: Politics of Immigration and Citizenship after Reunification. Master thesis, Graduate School, Seoul National University, Seoul. Pastor, R.編，董更生譯，2000，《二十世紀之旅：七大強權如何塑造二十世紀》，臺北：聯經。譯自A Century’s Journey: How the Great Powers Shape the World. New York: Basic Books. Pautz, H. 2005. “The Politics of Identity in Germany: The Leitkultur-Debate.” Race and Class 46(4): 39-52. Phillips, N. and C. Hardy. 2002. Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of social Construction. London: Sage. Piper, N. 2000. “Citizenship and National Identity in Reunified Germany: the Ex-perience of the Turkish Minority.” In Political Thought and German Reunifica-tion, ed. H. Williams, C. Wight and N. Kapferer. London: Macmillan, 96-115. Preston, P. 1997. Political/Cultural Identity: Citizens and Nations in a Global Era. London: Sage. Remmler, K. 1997. “Reclaiming Space: Jewish Women in Germany Today.” In Writ-ing New Identities, ed. G. Brinker-Gabler and S. Smith. Minneapolis: The Uni-versity of Minnesota Press, 171-195. Risse, T. 2000. “‘Let’s Argue!’: Communicative Action in World Politics.” Interna-tional Organization. 54(1): 1-39. Risse, T. 2003a. Deutsche Identität und Außenpolitik. Department of Political and So-cial Sciences, Freie Universität Berlin. http://web.fu-berlin.de/atasp/texte/030113_identitaet_risse.pdf Risse, T. 2003b. Global Governance and Communicative Action. Department of Po-litical and Social Sciences, Freie Universität Berlin. http://web.fu-berlin.de/atasp/texte/031007_risse_governance_arguing%20GO.pdf Randow von, G. “Unter Polizeischutz: Ein Einwanderungsland ist Entsetzt wegen Seiner Probleme: Berlin-Neukölln ist kein Einzelfall. Eine Nachrichtenanalyse” Die Zeit 14/2006, http://www.zeit.de/online/2006/14/ruetlischule Rotte, R. 2000. “Immigration Control in United Germany: Toward a Broader Scope of National Policies.” International Migration Review 34(2): 357-390. Rorty, R. 1989. Contingency, Irony and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sabatier, P. 1988. “An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein.” Policy Sciences 21: 129-168. Sabatier, P. 1993. “Advocacy-Koalitionen, Policy-Wandel und Policy-Lernen. Eine Alternative zur Phasenheuristik.” In Policy-Analyse. Kritik und Neuorientierung, ed. A. Héritier. Opladen, Germany: Leske+Budrich, 116-148. Salmi, H. 1999. Imagined Germany: Richard Wagner’s National Utopia. Berlin: Peter Lang. Saretzki, T. 1996. “Wie Unterscheiden sich Argumentieren und Verhandeln?” In Verhandeln und Argumentieren. Dialog, Interessen und Macht in der Umweltpolitik, ed. V. von Prittwitz. Opladen, Germany: Leske+Budrich, 19-39. Saussure de, F. 1959. Course in General Linguistics. London: Peter Owen. Schild, J. 2003. “Europäisierung Nationaler Politischer Identitäten in Deutschland und Frankreich.” Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte B 3-4/2003: 31-39. Schimmelfennig, F. 2001. “Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Enlargement of the EU.” International Organization 55(1): 47-80. Schmidt, C. 2002. “Sozialstaat und Migration – Empirische Evidenz und wirtschafts- politische Implikationen für Deutschland.” Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung 71(2): 173-186. Schönwälder, K. 2000. “Minority Rights at Home and Abroad: the German Debate.” In Politics of Identity, ed. R. Hudson and F. Réno. London: Macmillan, 115-136. Schwelien, M. 1999. Das Boot ist Voll: Europa zwischen Nächstenliebe und Selbstschutz. Hamburg: Marebuch. Schweigler, G. 1985. Grundlagen der Außenpolitischen Orientierung der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Ramenbedingungen, Motive, Einstellungen. Ba-den-Baden, Germany: Nomos. Simon, A. 2002. East German Identity in 2002. Lecture presented at the Lindau Psy-chotherapeutic Weeks, April. Smith, A. 1996. “National Identity and the Idea of European Unity.” European Jour-nal of International Relations 2(2). Smith, S. and G. Brinkeer-Gabler. 1997. “Introduction: Gender, Nation, and Immigra-tion in the New Europe.” In Writing New Identities, ed. G. Brinker-Gabler and S. Smith. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press, 1-27. Sollors, W. 2005. “Good-bye, Germany!”, TRANSIT: Vol. 1: No. 1, Article 50902. http://repositories.cdlib.org/ucbgerman/transit/vol1/iss1/art50902 Soysal, Y. 1994. Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Soysal, Y. 1998. “Toward a Postnational Model of Membership.” In The Citizenship Debates, ed. G. Shafir. Minnepolis: The University of Minnesota Press. 189-217. Soysal, Y. 2000. “Identity and Transnationalization in German School Textbooks.” In Censoring History: Citizenship and Memory in Japan, Germany, and the United States, ed. L. Hein and M. Selden. Armonk, NY: East Gate, 127-149. Stavrakakis, Y. 2005. “Passions of Identification: Discourse, Enjoyment, and Euro-pean Identity.” In Discourse Theory in European Politics: Identity, Policy and Governance, ed. D. Howarth and J. Torfing. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 68-92. Tagesschau. 2004. Bütikofer Erhält Rückendeckung von der Basis. 5 May 2004. http://www.tagesschau.de/aktuell/meldungen/0,1185,OID3242572_NAVSPM1_REF1,00.html Der Tagesspiegel. 2006. Problemfall Hauptschule: Sozialarbeiter Sollen Helfen. 30 March. http://www.tagesspiegel.de/berlin/archiv/30.03.2006/2442369.asp Taylor, C. 1989. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Tibi, B. 1998. Europa ohne Identität? München: Bertelsmann. Torfing, J. 2005. “Discourse Theory: Achievements, Arguments, and Challenges.” In Discourse Theory in European Politics: Identity, Policy and Governance, ed. D. Howarth and J. Torfing. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1-32. Treitschke, H. 1918. Historische und Politische Aufsätze. Leipzig, Germany: S. Hirzel. Triandafyllidou, A. 2001. Immigrants and National Identity in Europe. London: Routledge. Ulbert, C. and T. Risse. 2001. “Arguing and Persuasion in Multilateral Negotiation: Theoretical Approach and Research Design” Paper presented at the 4th Pan European International Relations Conference, September 7-10, at the University of Kent, Canterbury, U.K. Volkan, V. 1999. Das Versagen der Diplomatie: Zur Psychoanalyse Nationaler, Ethnischer und Religiöser Konflikte. Giessen, Germany: Psychosozial. Wæver, O., B. Buzan, M. Kelstrup, and P. Lemaitre with D. Carlton et al. 1993. Iden-tity, Migration and the New Security Agenda in Europe. London: Pinter. Wæver, O. 2005. “European Integration and Security: Analysing French and German Discourse on State, Nation, and Europe.” In Discourse Theory in European Politics: Identity, Policy and Governance, ed. D. Howarth and J. Torfing. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 33-67 Wallich, H. 1976. Mainsprings of the German Revival. New York: Greenwood Press Reprint. Werbner, R. 1996. “Multiple Identities, Plural Arenas.” In Postcolonial Identities in Africa, ed. R. Werbner, and T. Ranger. London: Zed. Wittgenstein, L.著，尚志英譯，1995，《哲學研究》，臺北：桂冠。譯自Philosophische Untersuchung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. 1982. Wodak, R. 2002. “Fragmented Identities: Redefining and Recontextualizing National Identity.” In Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Dis-course, ed. P. Chilton and C. Schäffner. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 143-169. Zolberg, A. 1987. “‘Wanted but Not Welcome’: Alien Labor in Western Develop-ment.” In Population in an Interacting World, ed. W. Alonso. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 36-73. Zuwanderungskommission. 2001. Zuwanderung Gestalten, Integration Fördern. Berlin: Unabhängige Kommission “Zuwanderung”. 江宜樺，1998，《自由主義、民族主義與國家認同》，臺北：楊智。 李曉儒，2004，《英、法、德三國移民政策之比較》，臺北：東吳大學政治學系碩士論文。 李俊增，2006，〈論哈伯馬斯之憲政愛國主義〉，《歐美研究》，36(1): 29-73。 姚源明，1999，《解嚴後臺灣國族認同論述的分析》，臺北：臺灣大學政治學系碩士論文。 陳珮綺，2003，《德國移民問題之研究》，臺北：淡江大學歐洲研究所碩士論文。 陳思賢，2005，國立臺灣大學政治學系西洋政治思想史講課。 游茜荻，2004，《德國外籍勞工問題之研究》，嘉義：南華大學歐洲研究所碩士論文。 曾慶豹，1998，《哈伯瑪斯》，臺北：生智。 簡桂華，1998，《德國再統一後外國人問題之研究》，臺北：淡江大學歐洲研究所碩士論文。 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/30751 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 當前對德國移民議題的研究甚豐，但往往在深度與廣度上對研究課題設下自我框限，並對「德意志性」存有誤會性的預設。本文將政策制定定義為「政治溝通」之產物，亦即是反應不同社會需求之政策建議間，透過溝通性互動以達成的最終政策產出。藉由比較哈伯瑪斯與傅柯的論述理論，並綜合不同學術領域中討論德意志性的文獻後，本文試圖提出一個研究政策制定過程的框架，以討論政策產出的溝通過程。這個框架一方面處理政策建議的源起，認為政策之建議係反應社會需求，而社會需求起自於受到存在性威脅的社會認同，又不同的社會認同則源自複合的社會論述形構；另一方面，此框架將政治溝通的模式分為「依歸理性的辯論模式」以及「以權力互動的談判模式」。研究者對溝通方式分辨，係以政策建議間是否有相同的論述參考源為判定。透過對「典型德意志」的分析，我們發現德意志社會在處理國家或民族議題時，皆漸漸地在「國家即權力」的論述範疇中找到溝通上的共識。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Despite being abundant in quantity, most recent studies on German immigration issues reveal two blaring restrictions: They are focused too narrowly upon specific policies, and they seem to bear the misassumption of the fixedness of “Deutschtum.” The thesis defines policy-making as an output of phased communicative interactions – political communication – between different policy proposals which reflect social needs. By comparing Habermasian and Foucaultian discourse studies, and by review-ing literatures of various academic fields on Deutschtum, the thesis proposes a framework for studying policy-making with an emphasis on the communicative proc-ess. The framework composes two parts. First, it displays the derivation of policy pro-posals. The policy proposals reflect social needs, which derive from existential threats to different social identities, and these identities stem from the complex of social discursive formations. Secondly, two modes of political communicative action are introduced, including “reason-oriented arguing” and “power-oriented bargaining”. Researchers discriminate between reason-giving and power-manipulating manoeuvres by recognising whether the proposals share the same discursive formation as the ref-erence pool. After analysing “Typish Deutsch”, it is argued that the German society tends to acquire reference from the discursive formation of “State vis-à-vis Power” and gradually reaches a consensus when encountering the issues of state and nation. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T02:14:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-R93322009-1.pdf: 834923 bytes, checksum: 0ded0f2b3b84dc77114f7775e24cc146 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝誌 i
中文摘要 iii Abstract iv 目錄 v 圖表目錄 vii 第一章 德國移民政策研究 1 第一節 在德國的移民 1 第二節 德國移民政策研究文獻與研究困境 3 第三節 公共政策制定之語言運用與政治溝通 7 第四節 研究結構與限制 10 一 結構 10 二 方法與限制 12 第二章 政策與政治溝通 15 第一節 政治溝通的理論基礎：哈伯瑪斯的溝通行動理論 15 第二節 Risse的二種溝通模式與補充 19 第三節 認同與傅柯的社會論述形構 22 一 社會認同的脈絡 22 二 傅柯式論述研究 28 第三章 德意志認同與存在性威脅的出現 35 第一節 德意志民族與國家的發展：浪漫主義與國家主義 35 一 浪漫主義潮流下的民族思維 36 二 國家主義下的權力思考 38 第二節 血緣、傳承、文化 40 一 跨時空的文化與血緣 40 二 對共同記憶的反省加深血緣社群的連結 42 三 兩德統一後的發現 44 第三節 國家、服務、公權力 46 一 國家提供與保障權利 46 二 經濟奇蹟安全感 48 三 公民民主社會與憲政愛國主義 49 四 歐洲整合與歐洲公民權 51 第四節 論述上之他者與移民政策 53 第四章 2000年後德國移民政治的政策討論：民族與國家 59 第一節 德國移民政治制定過程 59 一 政策建議正當性自成格局 59 二 政策溝通中的辯論與協商 60 三 政策產出的共識與折衷 63 第二節 主流文化爭辯與移民政治溝通 64 一 主流文化爭辯 64 二 「主流文化」下的移民政治溝通 67 第三節 移民法制定的兩階段及政治溝通 71 一 第一階段2001─2003 72 二 第一階段的溝通過程 75 三 第二階段2003─2004與溝通過程 77 第五章 後民族時代的公民社群 85 第一節 典型德意志？ 85 第二節 後民族國家 88 第六章 結論 93 第一節 認同論述與政治溝通 93 第二節 後記 97 參考文獻 99 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 談判 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 德國 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 政治溝通 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 論述理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 辯論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 移民政策 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Bargaining | en |
| dc.subject | Germany | en |
| dc.subject | Immigration Policy | en |
| dc.subject | Political Communication | en |
| dc.subject | Discourse Theories | en |
| dc.subject | Arguing | en |
| dc.title | 論德國移民政治溝通（2000─2005） | zh_TW |
| dc.title | On Political Communication of German Immigration Policy (2000─2005) | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 95-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 施正鋒,紀舜傑,謝國斌 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 德國,移民政策,政治溝通,論述理論,辯論,談判, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Germany,Immigration Policy,Political Communication,Discourse Theories,Arguing,Bargaining, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 109 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2007-05-12 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 政治學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-96-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 815.35 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。