請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/30746完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 江宜樺 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu-I Lee | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 李豫宜 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T02:14:18Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2007-05-18 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2007-05-18 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2007-05-15 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 一、托克維爾著作
AR：The Old Régime and the French Revolution.《舊制度與大革命》，馮棠譯，香港：牛津大學出版社，1994。 DA：Democracy in America.《論美國的民主》，董果良譯，北京：商務印書館，2002。 JA：Journey to America. Trans. George Lawrence. Ed. J. P. Mayer. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1971. MP：Memoir on Pauperism. Trans. Seymour Dresher. Chicago, IL: Ivan R. Dee, 1997. SL：Selected Letters on Politics and Society. Ed. Roger Boesche; trans. James Toupin and Roger Boesche. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985. The Old Régime and the French Revolution. Trans. Alan S. Kahan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998. Democracy in America. Eds. Harvey C. Mansfield & Delba Winthrop. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2000. 二、中文著作 丘昌泰，1987，〈美國民主的觀察家：托克維爾﹝Alexis de Tocqueville﹞（1805-1859）――評介其對美國自由與平等理念的觀察〉《思與言》25(1): 85-99。 江宜樺，2001，《自由民主的理路》，台北：聯經。 李丁讚等著，2004，《公共領域在台灣：困境與契機》，台北：桂冠圖書。 吳乃德，〈搜尋民主公民——社團參與的理論與實際〉收入《公共領域在台灣：困境與契機》。台北：桂冠圖書，2004年。頁177-214。 錢永祥，2001，《縱欲與虛無之上：現代情境裡的政治倫理》，台北：聯經。 Aron, Raymond著，葛智強等譯，2000，《社會學主要思潮》，北京市：華夏出版社。譯自Main Currents in Sociological Thought. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor Books. Montesquieu著，張雁深譯，1998，《論法的精神》，台北市：台灣商務。 三、英文著作 Allen, Barbara. 2005. Tocqueville, Covenant, and the Democratic Revolution: Harmonizing Earth with Heaven. Lanham: Lexington Books. Aron, Raymond. 1968-1970. Main Currents in Sociological Thought. Trans. Richard Howard and Helen Weaver. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor Books. Baier, Annette C. 1993. “How Can Individualists Share Responsibility?” Political Theory 21(2): 228-48. Barber, Benjamin R. 1984. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press. Bellah, Robert. .. [et al.], eds. 1996. Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley: University of California Press. Berger, Peter L. & Richard John Neuhaus. 1996. To Empower People: from State to Civil Society. Edited by Michael Novak. Washington, D.C.: AEI Press. Berkowitz, Peter. 1996. “The Art of Association.” New Republic 24: 44-49. Berlin, Isaiah. 2002. “Two Concepts of Liberty.” In Liberty, eds. Henry Hardy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bloemraad, Irene. 2005. “The Limits of de Tocqueville: How Government Facilitates Organisational Capacity in Newcomer Communities.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 31(5): 865-887. Bloom, Alan. 1987. The Closing of the American Mind. New York: Simon & Schuster. Boesche, Roger. 1980. “The Prison: Tocqueville’s Model for Despotism.” The Western Political Quarterly 33(4): 550-563. -----. 1983. “Why Could Tocqueville Predict so Well?” Political Theory 11(1): 79-103. -----. 1987. The Strange Liberalism of Alexis de Tocqueville. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. -----. 1996. Theories of Tyranny: from Plato to Arendt. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press. -----. 2005. “The Dark Side of Tocqueville: On War and Emoire.” The Review of Politics 67(4): 737-752. Boyd, Richard. 2004. Uncivil Society: the Perils of Pluralism and the Making of Modern Liberalism. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books. Clinton, W. David. 2003. Tocqueville, Lieber, and Bagehot: Liberalism Confronts the World. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Cohen, Jean L. & Andrew Arato. 1994. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1994. Copp, David, Jean Hampton, and John E. Roemer, eds. 1993. The Idea of Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press. Craiutu, Aurelian. 1999. “Tocqueville and the Political Thought of the French Doctrinaires (Guizot, Royer-Collard, R’emusat).” History of Political Thought 20(2): 456-493. Deneen, Patrick J. 2005. Democratic Faith. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Dionne, E.J., ed. 1998. Community Works: the Revival of Civil Society in America. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. Drescher, Seymour. 1964. “Tocqueville’s Two Democraties.” Journal of the History of Ideas, 25(2): 201-216. -----. 1964. Tocqueville and England. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. -----. 1968. Dilemmas of Democracy: Tocqueville and Modernization. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. Drolet, Michael. 2003. Tocqueville, Democracy and Social Reform. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Edwards, Bob, Michael W. Foley, & Mario Diani, eds. 2001. Beyond Tocqueville: Civil Society and the Social Capital Debate in Comparative Perspective. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England. Frohnen, Bruce. 1993. Virtue and the Promise of Conservatism: the Legacy of Burke and Tocqueville. Lawrence, Kan.: University Press of Kansas. Fukuyama, Francis. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press. Furet, François. 1981. Interpreting the French Revolution. Trans, E. Forster. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Galston, William. 2000. “Civil Society and the ‘Art of Association’.” Journal of Democracy 11(1): 64-70. Gannett, Robert T. Jr. 2003. Tocqueville Unveiled: the Historian and his Sources for The Old Regime and the Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. -----. 2005. “Tocqueville and Local Government Distinguishing Democracy’s Second Track.” The Review of Politics 67(4): 721-736. Gans, Herbert J. .. [et al.], eds. 1979. On the Making of Americans: Essays in Honor of David Riesman. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Goldberg, Chad A. 2001. “Social Citizenship and a Reconstructed Tocqueville.” American Sociological Review 66: 289-315. Hadari, Saguiv A. 1989. Theory in Practice: Tocqueville's New Science of Politics. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. Hamilton, Alexander, James Madison and John Jay. 1982. The Federalist Papers. New York : Bantam. Hereth, Michael. 1986. Alexis de Tocqueville: Threats to Freedom in Democracy. Translated by George Bogardus. Durham: Duke University Press. Hirschman, Alberto O. 1970. Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Holmes, Stephen. 1993. “Tocqueville and Democracy.” In The Idea of Democracy, eds. David Copp, Jean Hampton, & John E. Roemer. New York: Cambridge University Press, 23-63. Janara, Laura. 2002. Democracy Growing Up: Authority, Autonomy, and Passion in Tocqueville's Democracy in America. Albany: State University of New York Press. Jacobitti, Suzanne D. 1991. “Individualism & Political Community: Arendt & Tocqueville on the Current Debate in Liberalism.” Polity 23(4): 585-604. Jardin, André. 1988. Alexis de Tocqueville: A Biography. Trans. Lydia Davis & Robert Hemenway. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux. Kahan, Alan S. 1985. “Tocqueville’s Two Revolutions.” Journal of the History of Ideas 46(4): 585-596. -----. 1992. Aristocratic Liberalism: the Social Thought of Jacob Burckhardt, John Stuart Mill, and Alexis de Tocqueville. New York: Oxford University Press. Kelly, George Armstrong. 1992. The Humane Comedy: Constant, Tocqueville, and French Liberalism. New York: Cambridge University Press. Klein, H. K. 1999. “Tocqueville in Cyberspace: Using the Internet for Citizen Associations.” The Information Society 15(4): 213-220. LaCapra, Dominick. 2000. History and Reading: Tocqueville, Foucault, French Studies. Toronto; Buffalo: University of Toronto Press. Lamberti, Jean-Claude. 1989. Tocqueville and the Two Democracies. Trans. Arthur Goldhammer. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Lawler, Peter Augustine, ed. 2004. Democracy and its Friendly Critics: Tocqueville and Political Life Today. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books. Ledeen, Michael Arthur. 2000. Tocqueville on American Character: why Tocqueville’s Brilliant Exploration of the American Spirit is as Vital and Important Today as it was Nearly Two Hundred Years Ago. New York: St. Martin's Press. Levy, Jonah D. 1999. Tocqueville’s Revenge: State, Society, and Economy in Contemporary France. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Macfarlane, Alan. 2000. The Riddle of the Modern World: of Liberty, Wealth and Equality. New York: St. Martin's Press. Maguire, Matthew W. 2006. The Conversion of Imagination: from Pascal through Rousseau to Tocqueville. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Manent, Pierre. 1996. Tocqueville and the Nature of Democracy. Trans. John Waggoner. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield. Mayer, J. P. 1966. Alexis de Tocqueville: a Biographical Study in Political Science. Gloucester, Mass.: Peter Smith. McLean, Scott L., David A. Schultz, & Manfred B. Steger, eds. 2002. Social Capital: Critical Perspectives on Community and “Bowling Alone”. New York; London: New York University Press. Mélonio, Francoise. 1998. Tocqueville and the French. Trans. Beth G. Raps. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia. Mitchell, Harvey. 1996. Individual Choice and the Structures of History: Alexis de Tocqueville as Historian Reappraised. N. Y.: Cambridge University Press. -----. 2002. America after Tocqueville: Democracy against Difference. New York: Cambridge University Press. Mitchell, Joshua. 1995. The Fragility of Freedom: Tocqueville on Religion, Democracy, and the American Future. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Nisbet, Robert A. 1976. “Many Tocquevilles.” American Scholar 46: 59-75. -----. 2002. Conservatism: Dream and Reality. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers. Nolla, Eduardo. 1992. Liberty, Equality, Democracy. New York: New York University Press. Offe, Claus. 2005. Reflections on America: Tocoqueville, Weber and Adorno in the United States. Malden, MA: Polity. Ossewaarde, M. R. R. 2004. Tocqueville's Moral and Political Thought: New Liberalism. London; New York: Routledge. Pierson, George Wilson. 1996. Tocqueville in America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Pitts, Jennifer. 2005. A Turn to Empire: the Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Poggi, Gianfranco. 1972. Images of Society: Essays on the Sociological Theories of Tocqueville, Marx, and Durkheim. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. Polanyi, Karl. 1957. The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon. Pope, Whitney. 1986. Alexis de Tocqueville: His Social and Political Theory. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage. Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. -----. 1995. “Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital.” Journal of Democracy 6(1): 65-78. -----. 1995. “Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America.” PS: Political Science and Politics 28(4): 664-683. -----. 2000. Bowling Alone: the Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster. -----. 2003. Better Together: Restoring the American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster. Reinhardt, Mark. 1997. The Art of Being Free: Taking Liberties with Tocqueville, Marx, and Arendt. Ithaca, NY; London: Cornell University Press. Richter, Melvin. 1970. “The Use of Theory: Tocqueville’s Adaptation of Montesquieu.” In Essays in Theory and History: an Approach to the Social Sciences, ed. Melvin Richter. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. -----. 1982. “Toward a Concept of Political Legitimacy.” Political Theory 10: 185-214. -----. 2004. “Tocqueville and French Nineteen-Century Conceptualizations of the Two Bonapartes and Their Empires.” In Dictatorship in History and Theory: Bonapartism, Caesarism, and Totalitarianism, eds. Peter Baehr & Melvin Richter. New York: Cambridge University Press. Rosenblum, Nancy L. & Robert C. Post, eds. 2002. Civil Society and Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Sabl, Andrew. 2002. “Community Organizing as Tocquevillean Politics: The Art, Practices, and Ethos of Association.” American Journal of Political Science 46(1): 1-19. Satz, Debra. 1993. “Tocqueville, commerce, and Democracy,” in David Copp, Jean Hampton, and John E. Roemer, eds., The Idea of Democracy, 64-70 Schleifer, James T. 2000(1980). The Making of Tocqueville’s Democracy in America. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. Shiner, L.E. 1988. The Secret Mirror: Literary form and History in Tocqueville’s Recollections. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Siedentop, Larry. 1994. Tocqueville. New York: Oxford University Press. Skocpol, Theda & Morris P. Fiorina, eds. 1999. Civic Engagement in American Democracy. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: a Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. -----. 1996. “The Tocqueville Problem: Civic Engagement in America Democracy.” Social Science History 21(4): 455-479. Smith, Bruce James. 1985. Politics & Remembrance: Republican Themes in Machiavelli, Burke, and Tocqueville. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Smith, Dennis. 1990. Capitalist Democracy on Trial: the Transatlantic Debate from Tocqueville to the Present. London; New York: Routledge. Tilton, T. A. 1979. “Alexis de Tocqueville and the Political and the Political Sociology of Liberalism.” Comparative Social Research 2: 263-287. Villa, Dana. 2005. “Hegel, Tocqueville, and Individualism.” The Review of Politics 67(4): 659-686. Weir, Margaret & Marshall Ganz. 1997. “Reconnecting People and Politics.” In The New Majority: toward a Popular Progressive Politics, eds. Stanley B. Greenberg and Theda Skocpol. New Haven: Yale University Press. Welch, Cheryl. 2001. De Tocqueville. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. -----. 2003. “Colonial Violence and the Rhetoric of Evasion: Tocqueville on Algeria.” Political Theory 31(2): 235-264. -----, ed. 2006. The Cambridge Companion to Tocqueville. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. White, James Boyd., ed. 2006. How Should We Talk About Religion? : Perspectives, Contexts, Particularities. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press. Wolin, Sheldon. 1961. Politics and Vision: Continuity and Innovation in Western Political Thought. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd. -----. 2001. Tocqueville between Two Worlds: the Making of a Political and Theoretical Life. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Zetterbaum, Marvin. 1967. Tocqueville and the Problem of Democracy. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. -----. 1964. “Tocqueville: Neutrality and the Use of History.” The American Political Science Review 58(3): 611-621. Zunz, Olivier & Alan S. Kahan, eds. 2002. The Tocqueville Reader: a Life in Letters and Politics. Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/30746 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 國家與個人的關係向來是難解的問題。隨著政府公權力的滲透性越來越強，個人如何在其中保全自由與獨立性？本論文藉由托克維爾的民主理論，嘗試從不同的角度來關照民主的內涵與自由的意義。
本文在緒論中簡略介紹托克維爾的生平與思想背景後，第二章將先藉由托克維爾對於「民主」的理解與敘述，從政治、經濟、文化等各種角度大略描繪出美國民主社會的形象，並藉由它來展示一個新生的民主國家，所具有的優點，與其背後的隱憂，包括極端的個人主義、多數專制、中央集權等概念。第三章開始，本論文將焦點集中在中央集權與民主專制上。美國與法國儘管在歷史記憶、社會風氣都有所不同，卻都可能因為民主制度本身的傾向而走向中央集權。要避免這種傾向，托克維爾認為需從「民情」著手。本文第四章的目標在於分析公民結社與民情之間的關係，特別是公民結社負有改造民情的任務，而在此同時民情卻是公民結社得否活躍的基礎，究竟熟先熟後？美國與法國社會內部與歷史背景的差異，恰巧為這個問題提供了討論空間。結論部分將就此延伸，討論結社活動在現代社會可能遇到的挑戰或轉型的機會，藉由托克維爾理論，尋求建立公民社會、保障民主自由的希望。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T02:14:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-R93322002-1.pdf: 825952 bytes, checksum: 69e648d27f24b43cd6dd75e0d2b6a945 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 ……………………………………………… i
誌謝 ……………………………………………… ii 中文摘要 ……………………………………………… iii 英文摘要 ……………………………………………… iv 第一章 緒論 ……………………………………………… 1 第一節 前言 ……………………………………………… 1 第二節 托克維爾生平 …………………………………… 5 第三節 文獻回顧與研究途徑 ……………………………8 第四節 章節安排 ………………………………………… 14 第二章 站在民主自由與民主專制的十字路口 ………………17 第一節 民主社會的面貌 ………………………………… 19 第二節 民主的變質 ……………………………………… 29 第三節 民主社會中的個人：走向奴役之路？ ………… 40 第三章 中央集權的建立與新專制的誕生 ………………… 45 第一節 法國革命後的民主難題 ………………………… 47 第二節 中央集權：屹立於舊制度的灰燼之上 ………… 50 第三節 民主制度與中央集權 …………………………… 57 第四節 無可避免的中央集權？ ………………………… 64 第四章 自由的維繫：公民結社與民情的形塑 ………………71 第一節 政治自由的內涵 ………………………………… 72 第二節 公民結社：追求自由的技藝 …………………… 80 第三節 結社習慣與民情的養成 ………………………… 89 第五章 走出孤島：現代公民結社的發展 ……………………99 第一節 尋求政府與公民社會的平衡點 ………………… 101 第二節 公民結社的新挑戰 ……………………………… 107 結論 ……………………………………………… 111 參考文獻 ……………………………………………… 115 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 公民社會 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 托克維爾 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 中央集權 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 公民結社 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 民主 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 自由 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Tocqueville | en |
| dc.subject | civil society | en |
| dc.subject | freedom | en |
| dc.subject | democracy | en |
| dc.subject | civil association | en |
| dc.subject | centralization | en |
| dc.title | 托克維爾中央集權與公民結社關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Tocqueville on Centralization and Civil Association | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 95-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王遠義,蕭高彥 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 托克維爾,中央集權,公民結社,民主,自由,公民社會, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Tocqueville,centralization,civil association,democracy,freedom,civil society, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 126 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2007-05-15 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 政治學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-96-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 806.59 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。