請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/29980完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 杜榮瑞 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chun-Ting Hu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 胡鈞婷 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T01:28:39Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2007-07-30 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2007-07-30 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2007-07-13 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Anderson, R.C., and J.M. Bizjak. 2003. An empirical examination of the role of the CEO and the compensation committee in structuring executive pay. Journal of Banking and Finance 27: 1323-1348.
Baysinger, B.D., and H.N. Butler. 1985 Corporate governance and the board of directors: Performance effects of changes in board composition. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 1 (1): 101-25. Benson, G..J. 1985. The self-serving management hypothesis:Some evidence. Journal of Accounting and economics 7: 67-84. Berle, A.A., and G.C. Means. 1932. The modern corporation and private property. New York Macmillan. Boyd, B.K. 1994. Board control and CEO compensation. Strategic Management Journal 15: 335-344. Bushman, R.M., and A.J. Smith. 2001. Financial accounting information and corporate governance. Journal of Accounting and Economics 32: 237-333. Conyon, M.J., and S.I. Peck. 1998. Board control, remuneration committees, and top management compensation. Academy of Management Journal 41 (2): 146-157. Core, J.E., R.W. Holthausen, and D.F. Larcker. 1999. Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics 51: 371-406. Coughlan, A.T., and R.M. Schmidt. 1985. Executive compensation, management turnover, and firm performance:An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting and economics 7: 43-66. Daily, C.M., J.L. Johnson , A.E. Ellstrand, and D.R. Dalton. 1998. Compensation committee composition as a determinant of CEO compensation. Academy of Management Journal 41 (2): 209-220. DeAngelo, L.E. 1986. Accounting numbers as market valuation substitutes:A study of management buyout of public stockholders. Accounting Review 61 (3): 400-420. Eisenhardt, K.M. 1989. Agency theory:An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review 14 (1): 57-74. Fama, E.F., and M.C. Jensen. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics 26: 301-325. Finkelstein, S., and D.C. Hambrick. 1988. Chief executive compensation:A synthesis and reconciliation. Strategic Management Journal 9: 543-588. Finkelstein, S., and D.C. Hambrick. 1989. Chief executive compensation:A study of the intersection of markets and political processes. Strategic Management Journal 10: 121-134. Jensen, M.C., and W.H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm, managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305-360. Kerr, J., and R.A. Bettis. 1987. Boards of directors, top management compensation, and shareholder returns. Academy of Management Journal 30 (4): 645-664. Kerr, J.L., and L. Kern. 1992. Effect of relative decision monitoring on chief executive compensation. Academy of Management Journal 35 (2): 370-397. Lambert, R.A., D.F. Larcker, and K. Weigelt. 1993. The structure of organizational incentives. Administrative Science Quarterly 38 (3): 438-461. La Porta,R.F., F. Lopez-de-Silanes., and A. Shleifer. 1999. Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance 54: 471-571. Lewellen, W.G., and B. Huntsman. 1970. Managerial pay and corporate performance. The American Economic Review 60 (4): 710-720. Murphy, K.J. 1985. Corporate performance and managerial remuneration:An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and economics 7: 11-42. Newman, H.A., and H.A. Mozes. 1999. Does the composition of the compensation committee influence CEO compensation practices. Financial Management 28 (3): 41-53. Tosi, H.L., and L.R.Gomez-Mejia. 1994. CE0 compensation monitoring and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal 37 (4): 1002-1016. Oviatt, B.M. 1988. Agency and transaction cost perspectives on the manager-shareholder relationship:Incentive for congruent interests. Academy of Management Review 13 (2): 214-225. Weisbach, M.S. 1988. Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 431-460. Williamson, O.E. 1983. Organization form, residual claimants, and corporate control. Journal of Law and Economics 26: 351-266. 蕭弘毅(1993)高階管理者薪酬計畫與企業營運績效關係之研究,東吳大學管理科學研究所論文 孫秀蘭(1996)董事會制度與企業經營績效之研究,國立台灣大學財務金融研究所論文 辜秋屏(1997)高階主管酬勞與公司經營績效之實證研究,國立台灣大學會計學研究所論文 陳文河(1999)上市公司外部董事及監察人行使職權成效之研究,證交資料,第456期,1-14 曾玉潔(2000)我國高階主管薪酬決定因素之實證研究,國立中正大學會計學研究所論文 何幸芳(2003)獨立董監事對公司價值與盈餘資訊內涵影響之研究,輔仁大學金融研究所論文 呂春綢(2004)我國獨立董監制度與公司績效關係研究,國立台北大學會計學研究所論文 謝依霖(2004)以賽局模型分析獨立董事於公司治理之實質效能,國立台灣大學國際企業研究所論文 廖一成(2004)機構投資人與外部董事對高階管理者薪酬影響之研究,國立東華大學企業管理研究所論文 蕭瓊枝(2005)我國獨立董監制度及董監酬勞對公司經營績效影響之研究,輔仁大學會計學研究所論文 宋致皓(2006)董監酬勞與公司治理關聯性之研究,國立政治大學會計學研究所論文 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/29980 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 摘要
我國上市櫃公司發放董監酬勞已成常態,但長期以來不斷被詬病董監事領取超過合理標準的酬勞,故本研究欲探討影響董監酬勞的因素為何;又近年來政府推行獨立董事制度,希望藉由其獨立的特性,在台灣現今董事會與管理當局高度重疊的經營模式下,獨立董事能發揮其監督的功能,並有效抑止過度發放酬勞,畢竟董監酬勞屬於稅後盈餘的分配,分配比例越高對股東的傷害越大。基於過去文獻與制度設立目的,本研究發展假說如下: 假說一:董事與監察人酬勞與公司經營績效呈正相關。 假說二:董監酬勞發放比例與董事會中獨立董事比例呈負相關。 本研究使用2003至2005年間資料,以台灣上市櫃家數最多,同時是台灣經濟命脈的資訊電子產業為分析對象,各變數資料取自於公司所有公開的資料,範圍包括台灣經濟新報資料庫、公開資訊觀測站與公司網站等。總取得584家公司、1752筆樣本資料。研究結果發現: 假說一:公司績效與董監酬勞有顯著的正向關係。 假說二:董監酬勞發放比例與董事會中獨立董事所佔比例無顯著之關聯。 此外公司營運現金流量、董監事的實際持股比例與公司規模,同為決定董監酬勞金額的影響要素,本研究另發現最終控制者所控制的席次與其持有的股份偏離幅度越大時,董監酬勞發放比例越高,顯示因以不成比例的股份取得董事會的席次,最終控制者可能因此過度浪費公司資源,使酬勞發放的金額增加,而犧牲了小股東的權益;另一方面最終控制者任董事比例與酬勞發放比例呈負相關,顯示控制者與公司利益一致,會配合公司的營運概況,故會制止董監酬勞過度發放。又多數獨立董事兼職情況嚴重時,對公司的影響力降低,將促使公司發放較高比例的董監酬勞。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This thesis examines two research issues. First is the association between compensation for the members of board of directors and supervisors (hereafter “compensation of directors and supervisors”) and company performance. Second is the association between independent directors and percentage of compensation for directors and supervisors to net income (hereafter “percentage of compensation for directors and supervisors”). Percentage of compensation for directors and supervisors is defined as the proportion of compensation for directors and supervisors to net income. Using data obtained from Taiwan Economic Journal, Market Observation Posting System (MOPS), and company websites for the electronics companies listed in Taiwan Stock Exchange and GreTai Securities Market for the period 2003-2005, a total of 584 companies and 1,752 observations for the variables constitute the sample for this study. The empirical results show that compensation of directors and supervisors is positively and significantly associated with company performance. In addition, proportion of independent directors has no significant association with percentage of compensation for directors and supervisors. Using the median of the percentage of compensation for directors and supervisors to split the sample into two sub-samples and conduct the same analyses indicates that when the companies whose percentage of compensation for directors and supervisors is above the median, there is a significant and negative association between proportion of independent directors and percentage of compensation for directors and supervisors. Further, disparity between control right (number of directors) and cash flow right (number of shares owned) of ultimate controllers (owners) is positively correlated with compensation of directors and supervisors. Number of directors coming from ultimate controllers (owners) is negatively correlated with percentage of compensation for directors and supervisors. Finally, independent directors serving on the board for more than three companies tend to be associated with higher percentage of compensation for directors and supervisors. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T01:28:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-R94722031-1.pdf: 2524573 bytes, checksum: 54520c23b31d8759c5395df3050d84ab (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝………………………………………………………………………………… i
中文摘要……………………………………………………………………………. ii 英文摘要…………………………………………………………………………… iii 表目錄……………………………………………………………………………... vii 第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………………...... 1 第一節 研究動機與目的………………………………………………........ 1 第二節 研究問題…………………………………………………………… 2 第三節 本文結構………………………………………………………….... 2 第二章 文獻探討與研究假說…………………………………………………..... 3 第一節 代理問題與薪酬制度…………………………………………….... 3 第二節 獨立董事………………………………………………………….. 14 第三節 研究假說………………………………………………………….. 26 第三章 研究方法………………………………………………………………. 30 第一節 研究模型與變數的衡量…………………………………………… 30 第二節 樣本選取與資料蒐集方式………………………………………… 34 第三節 資料分析方法……………………………………………………… 37 第四章 研究結果與分析………………………………………………………. 39 第一節 敘述統計分析……………………………………………………… 39 第二節 相關性分析………………………………………………………… 46 第三節 假說檢定…………………………………………………………… 50 第四節 敏感性測試………………………………………………………… 57 第五章 結論與建議............................................................................................... 66 第一節 結論…………………………………………………………………. 66 第二節 研究限制………………………………………………………….... 67 第三節 對後續研究建議………………………………………………… 68 參考文獻………………………………………………………………………….. 69 附錄……………………………………………………………………………….. 73 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 公司績效 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 董監酬勞 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 獨立董事 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | independent directors | en |
| dc.subject | compensation | en |
| dc.subject | supervisors | en |
| dc.subject | performance | en |
| dc.title | 獨立董事.公司績效與董監酬勞之關聯 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Relationship among Independent Director, Firm Performance and Director Compensation | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 95-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃?芬,王全三 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 董監酬勞,獨立董事,公司績效, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | independent directors,supervisors,compensation,performance, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 82 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2007-07-17 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 會計學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-96-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.47 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
