請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/29735
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 傅祖壇 | |
dc.contributor.author | Hsin-Chih Pu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 卜心智 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T01:16:46Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-07-27 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2007-07-27 | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2007-07-19 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 江豐富,1990。「文憑主義在台灣勞動市場的重要性-以學歷取才還是以人力資本取才」,『經濟論文』。18卷,2期,129-178。
張春興,1996。『教育心理學』。台北市:台灣東華書局。 曹添旺、賴景昌、張峰嘉,2002。「台灣經濟學術單位在Econlit資料庫的學術表現」, 『經濟論文』。30卷,2期,115-152。 Aigner, D.J., C.A.K Lovell and P. Schmidt, 1977, “Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Model,” Journal of Econometrics. 6: 21-37. Altonji, J.G.,. and T. A . Dunn, 1996.“Using Siblings to Estimate the Effect of School Quality on Wages,” Review of Economics and Statistics. 78:4 . 665-671. Ashenfelter, O., Harmon C., and Oosterbeek H.,1999.“A Review of Estimates of the Schooling/Earnings Relationship, with Tests for Publication Bias ,”Labour Economics. 6(4):453-470. Battese, G.E., and G.S. Corra ,1997. “Estimation of a Production Frontier Model: With Application to the Pastoral Zone of Eastern Australia”, Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics.21:169-179. Battese, G.E., and T.J. Coelli, 1993.“A Stochastic Frontier Production Function Incorporationg a Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects,” Working Papers in Econometrics and Applied Statistics, No.69, Department of Econometrics, University of New England, Armidale. Battese, G.E., and T.J. Coelli, 1995.“A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data,” Empirical Economics.20:325-332. Behrman, J.R., M.R. Rosenzweig, and P. Taubman, 1996. “College Choice and Wages: Estimates Using Data on Female Twins,” Review of Economics and Statistics. 78(4):672-685. Betts, J. R., 1995. “Does School Quality Matter? Evidence from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth,” Review of Economics and Statistics. 77(2): 231-250. Black, D.A. and Smith, J. A., 2005. “College Quality and Wages in the United States,” German Economic Review .6(3), 289-299. Davis, T. M. and Murrell, P. H., 1993. Turning Teaching into Learning:The Role of Student Responsibility in The College Experience, Washington University. Dearden, L., Ferri, J.,and Meghir, C., 2002. The Effect of School Quality on Educational Attainment and Wages,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1): 1-20. Fitzgerald, R., 2000.College Quality and The Earnings of Recent College Graduates. National Center for Education Statistic Research and Development Report no.2000-043, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC. Groot, W. and H. Oosterbeek,1994. “ Stochastic Reservation and Offer Wages,”Labour.1: 383-390. Green, W. H.,1992. LIMDEP Version 6.0:User’s Manual and Reference Guide, Econometric Software Inc., New York. Hanushek, E.A., 1986.“The Economics of Schooling: Production and Efficiency in Public Schools,” Journal of Economics Literature. 24:1141-1177. Hofler, Richard and Solomon Polachek,1982. “Ignorance in the Labour Market A New Approach for Measuring Information Content,” Proceedings of the American Statistical Association.422-425. Hofler, Richard A. and Murphy Kevin J.,1992.“Underpaid and Overworked: Measuring the Effect of Imperfect Information on Wages,”Economic Inquiry. 30(3):511-29. Hofler, R.A., Polachek, S.W., 1985. “ A New Approach for Measuring Wage Ignorance in The Labor Market ,” J. Econ. Bus. 37:267-276. Hirshleifer, J., 1973.“Where Are We in the Theory of Information? ”American Economic Review. 63(2):31-39. James, E., Alsalam, N., Conaty, J., and To, D. 1989. “College Quality and Future Earnings: Where Should You Send Your Child to College?” AEA Pages and Proceedings. 79: 247-252. Kroch, E. A.and Sjoblom, K.1994.“Schooling as Human Capital or a Signal: Some Evidence, ”Journal of Human Resources. 29(1):156-80. Meeusen, W. and J. van den Broeck, 1977. “Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions With Composed Error,” International Economic Review.18:435-444. Mincer, J.,1974. Schooling, experience and earning. NY: McGraw-Hill. Moffitt, R. A., 1996. “Symposium on School Quality and Educational Out-comes: Introduction,” Review of Economics and Statistics.78(4):559-561. Murnanc, R. J., Willctt J. B. Willctt, and Frank Levy, 1995. “The Growing Importance of Cognitive Skills in Wage Determination,” Review of Economics and Statistics.77:2:251-266. Ogloblin, C. and G. Brock, 2005. “Wage Determination in Urban Russia:Undrpayment and the gender differential,” Economic Systems.29:325-343. Richmond, J.,1974. “Estimating the Efficiency of Production,” International Economic Review.15:515-521. Schultz, T.W.,1971. Investment in human capital. NY: The Free Press. Tam, M., 2002. “Impact On Student Growth:A Quality Measure? ,”Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 56(2):379-392. Welh, F., 1966. “Measurement of the Quality of Schooling,” American Economic Review.56(2):379-392. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/29735 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究所關心的主要問題為國內大學經濟相關科系之學校教育與畢業生表現之關係,資料來源為教育部卓越計畫之問卷與統計資料庫之統計資料,研究中選定了畢業生的第一次工作薪水、目前待遇、找工作時間長短等三個指標當作其在勞動市場中的表現依據。另外,再輔以教育心理學所定義之三類價值層面的指標,當作學生主觀面表現之分析依據,此三類指標分別為認知指標、情意指標與技能指標。本研究選定口頭表達能力、書面資料分析、解釋和解決問題能力、主修領域知識的運用、非主修領域知識的運用等五個面向,作加總成為認知指標;人際關係、管理領導能力等兩個面向,作加總成為情意指標;外語能力和電腦應用相關能力,作加總成為技能指標,最後再加總認知、情意、技能指標來建立一綜合能力指標。文中共建立了三個模型:大學畢業生的勞動市場表現模型、能力培養模型與薪資邊界模型。前二者模型分別用以探討畢業生勞動市場表現和質性層面之成長,後者則是由隨機邊界模型發展而來,用以討論勞動市場中可能出現訊息不完全的情況。實證結果有以下五點較重要的發現:(一)學校教育與學生勞動市場表現的關係只有在起薪方面較有影響力,工作一段時間之後,學校教育對薪水的影響力就大幅降低。(二) 學校教育對學生的能力培養有非常大的影響。(三) 決定學生薪資的主要因素是畢業生在勞動市場上的經驗,以及不同學生本身所具備的不同社經環境。(四) 勞動市場中對於工資的給付存在著嚴重的性別歧視,但對學生的自我評價中,卻不會因性別不同而導致評價差異。(五) 非學科性教育在縮短找事時間長短中,扮演了一個比學科性教育更重要的角色。最後,本研究針對實證結果給予國內考生、大學在學生、家長、教育當局一些有建設性的建議作結。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This study concerns mainly about the effect of university education on student job market performance and ability development. The data come mainly from the questionnaires of the exceptional plans of the ministry of education. We choose three measures to represent the aspect of job market performance, which are the first wage, present wage and the time spent on looking for the first job. Moreover, we also find some appropriate measures to contain the other side of the performance of the graduates, say three measures of ability development, which are the growth of cognition, tender regards and skills. The growth of cognition is composed of oral ability, ability of paperwork, ability of solving problems, how well they can make use of their knowledge of major field and non-major field. The growth of tender regards is composed of interpersonal relationship and leadership. The growth of skills is composed of foreign language and computer skills. We construct three models to assess the effect of university education, which are job market performance model, ability development model and wage frontier model. The first two models are used to discuss job market performance and ability development of the graduates respectively. The wage frontier model obtained by the correction of stochastic frontier model concerns about the existence of imperfect information in the labor market. Followings are some empirical findings of this study:
1.The impact of university education on job market is only significant when discussing the first wage. As time goes by, the impact decreases dramatically. 2.There is large impact of university education on ability development. 3.The wage is mainly determined by the labor market experience variables and social-economic variables each graduate has. 4.Other things being equal, Men always get more wage than women, but there is no difference when discussing their ability development. 5.Non-academic training plays a more important role on deciding how long each graduate looks for their first job than academic training. Finally, we give the students who are going to join the university entrance exam and who are studying in university now, parents and educational authorities some useful suggestions from our empirical results. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T01:16:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-R94627005-1.pdf: 435927 bytes, checksum: cf931cb578130e42a8036be793725c60 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
謝 辭 ii 中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 iv 第一章 序論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第三節 研究方法 3 第二章 文獻回顧 5 第一節 學校教育與薪資之關係 5 第二節 學校教育與學生能力發展之關係 12 第三節 引進勞動市場不完全程度之必要 12 第四節 薪資方程式、隨機邊界與薪資邊界模型之介紹 15 第三章 實證研究變數設定與樣本統計量分析 24 第一節 實證研究變數設定 24 第二節 樣本統計量分析 37 第四章 大學畢業生的勞動市場表現模型與實證結果 45 第一節 勞動市場表現模型 45 第二節 勞動市場表現模型實證結果 47 第五章 大學畢業生之能力培養模型與實證結果 53 第一節 能力培養模型 53 第二節 能力培養模型之實證分析 54 第六章 大學畢業生之薪資邊界模型與實證結果 58 第一節 薪資邊界模型 58 第二節 薪資邊界模型實證結果 59 第七章 結論與建議 65 第一節 各模型之實證結論 65 第二節 研究重要發現與建議 70 第三節 研究貢獻與未來研究方向 72 參考文獻 73 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 學校教育對學生職場表現與能力培養之影響
—以台灣地區大學經濟相關科系為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Effect of University Education on Student Job Market Performance and Ability Development:The Case of Recent Economics Graduates in Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 95-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 黃芳玫 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃鏡如,田芳華 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 學校教育,大學品質,教育經驗,學生表現,隨機邊界, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | School Education,School Quality,Educational Experience,Student Performance,Stochastic Frontier, | en |
dc.relation.page | 75 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2007-07-19 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 農業經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 農業經濟學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-96-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 425.71 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。